throbber
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 92, pp. 11907-11911, December 1995
`Biochemistry
`
`Expression studies of catalytic antibodies
`HELLE D. ULRICH, PHILIP A. PATIEN, PRISCILLAL. YANG, FLOYD E. ROMESBERG, AND PETER G. SCHULTZ*
`Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
`
`Contributed by Peter G. Schultz, August 31, 1995
`
`ABSTRACT We have examined the positive influence of
`human constant regions on the folding and bacterial expres(cid:173)
`sion of active soluble mouse immunoglobulin variable do·
`mains derived from a number of catalytic antibodies. Expres·
`sion yields of eight hybridoma· and myeloma-derived chimeric
`Fab fragments are compared in both shake flasks and high(cid:173)
`density fermentations. In addition the usefulness of this
`system for the generation of in vivo expression libraries is
`examined by constructing and expressing combinations of
`heavy and light chain variable regions that were not selected
`as a pair during an immune response. A mutagenesis study of
`one of the recombinant catalytic Fab fragments reveals that
`single amino acid substitutions can have dramatic effects on
`the expression yield. This system should be generally appli·
`cable to the production ofFab fragments of catalytic and other
`hybridoma-derived antibodies for crystallographic and struc·
`tore-function studies.
`
`Many examples of antibody-catalyzed reactions have been
`reported, ranging from efficient acyl transfer and redox reac(cid:173)
`tions to stereoelectronically disfavored pericyclic and cycliza(cid:173)
`tion reactions (1, 2). In addition to providing a strategy for
`generating catalysts for reactions difficult to achieve by exist(cid:173)
`ing enzymatic or chemical methods, antibody catalysis pro(cid:173)
`vides a tool to gain increased insight into the mechanisms of
`biological catalysis and the evolution of catalytic function.
`These latter aims are facilitated by the availability of three(cid:173)
`dimensional structures of antibody active sites, coupled with
`mutagenesis experiments to confirm hypotheses about reac(cid:173)
`tion mechanisms. Unfortunately, such studies have been ham(cid:173)
`pered by difficulties in expressing many of the antibodies in
`recombinant form in quantities sufficient for mechanistic and
`crystallographic studies. In addition, the ability to express
`antibodies or antibody fragments in a bacterial system in
`soluble form, either periplasmically or cytoplasmically, is a
`prerequisite for attempts to improve their catalytic efficiency
`using random or directed mutagenesis, coupled with in vivo
`selection techniques (3, 4).
`A number of systems for the production of antibody frag(cid:173)
`ments have been described, most of which use bacterial signal
`sequences to direct the immunoglobulin chains to the
`periplasm or culture medium, where correct folding and
`disulfide bond formation are possible (for review, see ref. 5).
`However, reports of expression systems rarely describe their
`general applicability. For example, we have examined a variety
`of published systems by using a number of hybridoma- and
`myeloma-derived antibodies, including Fab and single-chain
`Fv fragments, various promoters [T7, lac, tac, and alkaline
`phosphatase (PhoA)], signal sequences (pelB and stll), fusions
`to maltose binding protein and ThiA ( 6), exchange of the
`constant (C) regions, and expression as a single-chain Fv
`fragment in the yeast Pichia pastoris (7) (ref. 8 and H.D.U. and
`P.G.S., unpublished results). In each case, the majority of the
`protein was found in insoluble aggregates, suggesting that the
`primary structure of the antibody greatly influences its correct
`
`folding in the periplasm and remains the limiting factor for its
`performance in a given expression system. The extensive study
`of the antibody McPC603 by Knappik and Pliickthun (9)
`supports this notion. A number of antibodies have been
`derived from phage display methods that express well and in
`soluble form (10). However, the well-behaved nature of these
`antibodies is likely a consequence of concurrent selection for
`correctly folded proteins and may not apply to hybridoma(cid:173)
`derived antibodies.
`One of the earliest reports of the expression of soluble
`antibody fragments in Escherichia coli was based on a chimeric
`Fab fragment (11). Carter and coworkers (12-14) have ob(cid:173)
`served large increases in expression yields of three humanized
`Fab fragments over the corresponding murine proteins; where
`reported, the murine-human chimeric Fab fragment was
`intermediate (12). Based on these observations, we have
`examined the expression of a panel of catalytic antibodies in a
`system that exploits this beneficial influence of the human
`sequences on the folding of the Fab fragment in the bacterial
`periplasm. Herein we report the expression studies of both
`hybridoma-derived antibodies and artificially constructed
`combinations of heavy and light chains and report the effects
`of point mutations and growth conditions on yields. This
`system appears to be generally applicable for the facile pro(cid:173)
`duction of useful quantities of active soluble mouse-human
`chimeric Fab fragments.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Strains and Plasmids. E. coli JM109 (15) was used for
`cloning, and the strain 25F2 (12), obtained from D. Henner
`(Genentech), was used for expression. Plasmids pMY61,
`pMY60, and pMY55 were gifts from M. Yang and D. Henner
`(Genentech). pMY61 contains an expression cassette for the
`humanized Fab fragment of antibody D1.3 (16), similar to that
`ofpAK19 (12), as anEcoRI-Sph I fragment in pBR322. Minor
`differences exist upstream of the ribosome binding sites.
`pMY60 and pMY55 contain the isolated heavy and light chains
`in the same context.
`Vector Construction and Cloning of Antibody Genes. Prim(cid:173)
`ers H1-H12 and Ll-L9 have been described by Huse et al. (17).
`The antibody 48G7 had been cloned (8). The 2E11 (18) and
`S107 (19) murine Fab fragments were cloned into the same
`vector from their cell lines analogously: total RNA was isolated
`from = 108 cells by standard methods (20), mRNA was purified
`by oligo(dT) affinity chromatography (15) with a kit from
`Pharmacia, eDNA was generated with primers L9 and H12 for
`2E11 or L9.and IgAH3 for S107 (the latter is designed to match
`the 3' end of the IgA heavy chain C region C8 1 sequence:
`5'-GTAATAGGACTAGTAGGAGTAGGACCAGA-3'),
`followed by PCR amplification with primers HZ, H12, L5, and
`L9 for 2E11 and IgAH3, L9, and primers designed to match the
`published variable [ K chain and heavy chain variable region
`(respectively, V K and V 8 )] sequences for S107. The VH and V K
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`Abbreviations: PhoA, alkaline phosphatase; V, variable; C, constant;
`J, joining; H (as subscript), heavy chain; K (as subscript), K chain;
`CDR, complementarity-determining-region.
`*To whom reprint requests should be addressed.
`
`11907
`
`BEQ 1042
`Page 1
`
`

`
`11908 Biochemistry: Ulrich et a/.
`
`Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995)
`
`regions were then moved into pMY60 and pMY55, respec(cid:173)
`tively, by PCR amplification with primers that produced Mlu
`1-BstEII (for 48G7: Mlu 1-Apa I) fragments of VH and
`Eco R V -Kpn I fragments of V K· Heavy and light chains were
`combined in an EcoRI-Sac 1-Mlu I triple ligation; a short
`Sac 1-M/u I fragment of pMY61 provided the intergenic
`region. The plasmid containing the 48G7 sequences was
`designated pDEI434. It was further modified by subcloning
`the entire expression cassette into pGC-1 (8), yielding
`pDEI440, and making the following substitutions by site(cid:173)
`directed mutagenesis (21): A Sac I site in the C" region was
`removed by introduction of a silent mutation. Two Hindlll
`sites upstream of the promoter were deleted by Hindlll
`digestion, blunting with the Klenow fragment of DNA
`polymerase I, and religation. The EcoRV site was replaced
`with a Sac I site, and unique Hindlll, Xho I, and BstEII sites
`were introduced as shown in Fig. 1. The expression cassette
`was then inserted back into pMY61 to yield p4xH. The
`following primers were designed to match the murine joining
`( J) regions and incorporate a Hind III into J" and a BstEII site
`into JH for cloning: JH1, TGAGGAGACGGTGACCGTG(cid:173)
`GTCCCTGCGCCCCA; JH2, TGAGGAGACGGTGACC(cid:173)
`GTGGTGCCTTGGCCCCA; JH3, TGCAGAGACGGTG(cid:173)
`ACCAGAGTCCCTTGGCCCCA; J~, TGAGGAGACGGT(cid:173)
`GACCGAGGTTCCTTGACCCCA; J"1' TTTGATTTCAAG(cid:173)
`CTTGGTGCCTCCACCGAACGT; 1"2, TTTTATTTCAAG(cid:173)
`CTTGGTCCCCCCTCCGAACGT; 1"3, TTTTATTTCAAG(cid:173)
`CTTGGTCCCATCACTGAACGT; JA, TTTTATTTCA(cid:173)
`AGCTTTGTCCCCGAGCCGAACGT; 1"5, TTTCAGCTC(cid:173)
`AAGCTTGGTCCCAGCACCGAACGT. They were used as
`an equimolar mixture (JH1-JH4 or J"1-J"5) during reverse
`transcription and PCR instead of H12 and L9 for cloning the
`VH and V" regions of the hybridomas 18R.136.1 (22), 28B4.2
`(23), AZ-28 (24), and 39,A11.1 (25) from their cell lines
`directly into p4xH. The V regions of 7G12-A10 (26) were
`cloned into p4x (p4xH lacking the Hindiii site) by using
`JH1-JH4 and a set of J" primers that incorporated a Kpn I site
`into the J region. Twenty-five PCR cycles (94°C for 1 min;
`50-55°C or 42°C during the first 5 cycles for VH for 2 min; and
`72°C for 1.5 min) were sufficient to amplify the desired
`sequences. The following primers were found to be optimal:
`primers H6 and L6 for 18R.136.1, H2 and L5 for 28B4.2, H2
`and L3 for AZ-28, H2 and L5 for 39,A11.1, and H7 and L5 for
`7G 12-AlO. Several clones of each chain were sequenced (27)
`to exclude PCR errors. We found that in some cases multiple
`J region primers had served to amplify the same V region,
`making one position in the J region ambiguous. The authentic
`sequence was identified by producing and PCR-amplifying
`eDNA encoding the whole Fab fragment and sequencing
`directly over the J region using a 32P-labeled primer and a Vent
`polymerase PCR sequencing kit (New England Biolabs). The
`combinations ofthe AZ-28, 18R.136.1, 28B4.2, 2Ell, and S107
`
`Mlul
`X hoi
`
`p4xH
`(5677 bp)
`
`FIG. 1. Map of the vector p4xH, indicating the restriction sites used
`for cloning. PphoA, PhoA promoter; stll, bacterial leader sequence;
`bla, 13-lactamase gene; Ori, coiEl origin of replication.
`
`chains with 48G7 were constructed by swapping EcoRI(cid:173)
`BamHI fragments containing the light chain sequences be(cid:173)
`tween pDEI434 and the respective expression vectors. The
`48G7 mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis in
`pDEI440 and were expressed directly in this vector.
`Expression and Purification of Chimeric Fab Fragments.
`For small-scale expression, 25 ml of Mops medium [30 mM
`Mops, pH 7.4/70 mM NaCI/10 mM KCl/1.6 mM MgS04/20
`mM N~Cl/0. 15% glucose/thiamine hydrochloride (1 ,.,_g/
`ml)/ampicillin (100 J.tg/ml)) supplemented with yeast extract
`and Casamino acids (Difco) in baffled shake flasks were
`inoculated with 0.5 ml of an overnight culture of 25F2 freshly
`transformed with the appropriate plasmid and incubated with
`vigorous shaking (300 rpm) at 30°C for 24 h unless otherwise
`noted. Optimal induction was found with yeast extract at 0.15
`g/liter and Casamino acids at 0.55 g/liter. Periplasmic lysates
`were prepared by resuspension of the cells on ice at 200 OD580
`units/ml in lysis buffer [20% (wt/vol) sucrose/30 mM
`Tris·HCl, pH 8.0/1 mM EDTA), transfer to microcentrifuge
`tubes, incubation with lysozyme at 1 mg/ml (added from a
`stock solution at 10 mg/ml in lysis buffer) at room temperature
`for 30 min, and a 3-min centrifugation in a microcentrifuge to
`pellet the spheroplasts. PhoA activity was measured by diluting
`the crude extract into DEA buffer [9.7% (vol/vol) diethanol(cid:173)
`amine, pH 9.8/0.5 mM MgCh/0.02% NaN3] with p(cid:173)
`nitrophenyl phosphate at 1 mg/ml and monitoringA405 • For a
`crude estimation, serial dilutions were set up in microliter
`plates, and the level of induction was judged visually by the
`highest dilution that still produced a signal. Larger cultures
`(1.5 liters) were treated as described above, scaling up all
`volumes accordingly and pelleting the spheroplasts in an SS34
`rotor (12,000 rpm, 15 min). High-density fermentations were
`performed in a 2.5-liter Bioflow III fermentor essentially as
`described by Carteret a/. (12), but with 3.3 mM NaH2P04 and
`6 mM KzHP04. Within 24 h, the cells were fully induced at an
`ODsso of 70-100 units, depending on the clone. Periplasmic
`lysates were prepared in 200-300 ml of lysis buffer with
`incubation for 1 h. The spheroplasts were pelleted (GS3 rotor
`at 8500 rpm for 30 min, if necessary followed by a centrifu(cid:173)
`gation at 16,000 rpm for 10 min in an SS34 rotor) and subjected
`to another incubation in lysis buffer as before. The superna(cid:173)
`tants were either subjected to an ammonium sulfate precipi(cid:173)
`tation (80% saturation) or concentrated to =100 ml in an
`Amicon ultrafiltration cell. Purification on protein G affinity
`columns (Sepharose CL-6B, Pierce) was performed at room
`temperature in 50 mM Mes, pH 5.5/100 mM NaCI. Protein was
`eluted with 100 mM glycine (pH 2.8); and the eluate was
`neutralized immediately with 0.1 vol of 1M Tris·HCl (pH 9.0).
`Characterization of the Recombinant Fab Fragments. Pro(cid:173)
`teins were analyzed by SDS/PAGE followed for purified
`protein by silver staining or for crude lysates by Western blot
`analysis (15) using an anti-human K chain-PhoA conjugate
`(Southern Biotechnology Associates) for detection and nitro
`blue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
`phosphate as substrate. The same antibody with p-nitrophenyl
`phosphate as substrate was used to detect hapten binding by
`ELISA. Wells were coated with bovine serum albumin (5
`J.tg/ml) conjugates of the appropriate haptens (8, 18, 22-26).
`Catalytic actjvity was measured as described (8, 22-24, 26).
`Concentrations of purified antibody were determined by mea(cid:173)
`suring Azso and A260 (28). Extinction coefficients varied be(cid:173)
`tween 61,500 and 74,200 M- 1·cm-t.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`Vector Construction. To investigate the beneficial influence
`of the human sequences on the folding of the Fab fragment in
`the bacterial periplasm, we chose to pursue chimeric constructs
`as opposed to humanized versions .of our catalytic antibodies.
`Humanization is an involved process that almost inevitably
`
`BEQ 1042
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Biochemistry: Ulrich et a/.
`
`Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995)
`
`11909
`
`results in some change in affinity for the hapten (29) that would
`likely be detrimental to catalysis. Due to the independence of
`V and C domains (30), no change in the structure of the V
`domains is observed when the murine C regions are exchanged
`for human versions (31).
`The expression system is based on that described by Carter
`et a/. (12) and this group (8). The vector from which it is
`derived, pMY61, is a pBR322 derivative very similar to pAK19
`(12); it uses the same PhoA promoter, inducible by phosphate
`starvation (32), stll signal sequences for secretion into the
`periplasm (33), and human C regions (34, 35), excluding the
`Cys-Ala-Ala hinge at the C terminus of the CH1 region. The
`V regions of the p-nitrophenyl phosphonate-specific antibody
`48G7 were subcloned into this vector from pDE166 (8). The
`genes of the phosphocholine-specific myeloma S107 (19) and
`those of the hybridoma 2E11 (18) were derived from analogous
`constructs, into which they had been previously cloned from
`the corresponding cell lines (H.D.U., P.A.P., and P.G.S.,
`unpublished results) .. The vector bearing the 48G7 Fab frag(cid:173)
`ment was then modified to allow the use of the V region PCR
`primers H1-H10 and Ll-L7, described by Huse eta/. (17), to
`clone antibody genes of unknown sequences: a Sac I site in the
`CK sequence and a Hindiii site upstream of the promoter were
`removed, Sac I and Xho I sites were incorporated at the N
`terminus of VK and VH, respectively, and Hindiii and BstEII
`sites were introduced into the J region sequences, resulting in
`the vector p4xH (Fig. 1).
`PCR primers incorporating Hindiii and BstEII sites into JK
`and JH, respectively, were designed to complement the V
`region primers. Combinations of these primers were used to
`amplify the V regions of the antibodies 18R.136.1 (22), 28B4.2
`(23), AZ-28 (24), 39,A11.1 (25), and 7G12-A10 (26) from
`eDNA obtained from their respective cell lines. The sequences
`of the light and heavy chain V regions of the cloned hybrido(cid:173)
`mas along with 48G7 and S107 are listed in Fig. 2 according to
`their subgroups as classified by Kabat et al. (36).
`Expression Studies. Small-scale shake-flask expression in
`Mops medium allowed for a quick estimation of relative yields,
`since the antibodies could easily be visualized on Western blots
`and their hapten-binding activity could be confirmed by
`ELISA assays of crude periplasmic fractions. Induction of the
`PhoA promoter was followed by measuring PhoA activity in
`
`the lysate. As shown in Fig. 3, accumulation of the antibody
`lagged 1-2 h behind the induction of PhoA.
`Under optimized expression conditions, the cells reached an
`OD580 of 2.0-2.5 units and remained stably induced for > 36 h
`without detectable lysis. Replacement of the PhoA promoter
`by the lac or tac promoter resulted in significant reductions of
`expression levels in some cases. Yields were more rigorously
`determined after purification of the protein from 1.5-liter
`cultures. As noted by Carter et a/. (12), the chimeric Fab
`fragments can be easily purified by protein G affinity chro(cid:173)
`matography. This method yielded the protein at >95% purity.
`Expression yields are given in Table 1.
`With the exception of the myeloma-derived S107, the yields
`are in the range of 1-3 mg/liter for four antibodies and 0.1-0.3
`mg/liter for the remaining three, which compares well with
`reported values (11). No obvious correlation between se(cid:173)
`quence homology and expression level was observed. The Fab
`fragments retained their hapten-binding and catalytic activity
`where tested (Table 1). Importantly, in all antibodies tested,
`the majority of the protein was produced in soluble form,
`whereas only a small fraction of Fab was soluble in the systems
`that we had examined previously. Even the small amounts of
`S107 Fab fragments were soluble, and only for the 2E11 clone
`was > 10% of total antibody associated with the cytoplasmic
`fraction (data not shown). Large quantities of recombinant
`protein could be produced in high-density (70-100 ODsso
`units) fermentations in a 2.5-liter Bioflow III fermentor by
`using a modification of the protocol described by Carter et a/.
`(12). Again, the antibodies were produced in soluble form,
`associated with the periplasm, and yields (10-150 mg/liter)
`were sufficient for crystallization and extensive kinetic studies
`(Table 1).
`On Western blots of crude periplasmic fractions of AZ-28,
`an additional band below the functional Fab fragment was
`detected. Deleting the heavy chain sequences from the plasmid
`and comparing the pattern of expression indicated that the
`additional band was a disulfide-linked light chain dimer.
`Deletion of the 48G7 heavy chain sequences resulted in light
`chains that migrated as monomers on a nonreducing gel (data
`not shown). The expression levels of these light chains were
`strongly reduced compared to the complete Fab fragment,
`indicating that isolated light chains are fairly unstable in the E.
`
`A
`
`FR4
`FR3
`FRI
`CDR3
`CDR2
`FR2
`CDRI
`1 DIVMTQSPTFLAVTASKKVTISC TASESLYSSKHKVHYLA WYQKKPEQSPKLLIY GASNRYI GVPDRFTGSGSGTDFTLTISSVQVEDLTHYYC AQFYSYPLT FGAGTKVEIK
`2 DIVMTQTPLSLPVSFGDQVSISC RSSQSLANSYGNTYLS WYLIIXPGQSPQLLIY GISNRFS GVPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLKISTVKPEDLGMYYC LQGTRQPPMYT FGGGTKVEIK
`3 ELVMTQTPLSLPVSLGDQASISC RFSQSIVHSNGNTYLE WYLQKSGQSPKLLIY KVSNRFS GVPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLKISRVEAEDLGVYYC FQGSHVPRT FGGGTKLEIK
`4 ELVM'l'QTPLSLPVSLGDQASISC RSSQSLLHSNGNTYLH WYLQKPGQSPKLLIY KVSNRFS GVPDRFSGSGSGTDFTLKISRVEAEDLGVYFC SQVTHVPPT FGGGTKLEIK
`5 DIQMTQSPSSLSASLGERVSLTC
`RASQEINGYLG
`WLQQKPDGTIKRLIY AASTLHS GVPKRFSGSRSGSDYSLTISSLESEDFADYYC LQYASYPRT FGGGTKVEIK
`6 ELVMTQSPSSLSASLGERVSLTC
`RASQDISNYLI
`WVQQKPDGTIKRLIY STSTLDS GVPKRFSGSRSGSDYSLTISSLESEDFADYYC LQYASSPFT FGSGTKLEIK
`7 ELVLTQSPSSMYASLGERVTITC
`KASQDINSYLN
`WFQQKPGKSPKTLIY RTNRLVD GVPSRFSGSGSGQDYSLTISSLEYEDMGIYYC LQYDEFPYT FGSGTKLEIK
`8 ELVMTQTPKFMSTTVGDRVSITC
`KASQNVGTPVA
`WYQQKPGQSPKLLIY SASNRYT GVPDRFTGSGSGTDFTLTISNMQSEDLADYPC QQYSSYPLT FGGGTKVEIK
`B
`
`CDR3
`FRI
`FR3
`CDR2
`FR2
`CDRI
`1 QVQLLESGAEIVRPGASVKLSCKASGYIFT DYWMN WVKQRPGQGLENIG GINPSDSSTNYNQRFKD KVTLTVDTSSNSAYIQLSSLTSEDSAVYFCAT
`SGRFRGGY
`2 QVQLLESGAELVKPGASVKLSCKASGYTFT
`RDMDY
`SYWMII WVKQRPGRGLENIG MIDPNSGG'l'KYNEKFKS KATLTVDKPSNTAYMQLSSLTSEDSAVYYCTR
`3 QVQLLESGAELMKPGASVKISCKATGYTFS SFWIE WVKQRPGHGLENIG EILPGSGG'l'HYNEKFKG KATPTADKSSNTAYMQLSSLTSEDSAVYYCAR GHSYYFYDGDY
`4 QVQLQQSGAELVKPGASVKLSCTASGFNIK DTYMH WVKQRPKQGLBWIG RIDPANVDTKYDPRFQD KATITADTSSKTTYLQLSGLTSEDTAVYYCAS
`YYGIY
`5 QVQLLESGGGLGQPGGSLRLSCATSGFTFT DYYFN WARQPPGKALBWLG FIRNKAKGYTTEYSASVKG RFTISRDNSQGILYLQMNTLRAEDSATYYCAR WGSYAMDY
`6 QVKLLESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCATSGFTFS DFYME WVRQPPGKRLBWIA ASRNKANDYTTEYSASVKG RFIVSRDTSQSILYLQMNALRAEDTAIYYCAR DYYGSSYWYFDV
`7 QVQLLESGPELKKPGETVKISCKASGYTFT NYGMN WVKQAPGKGLKWMG WINTY'I'GEPTYADDFKG RFAFSLETSASTAYLQINNLKNEDTATYFCVQ AERLRRTFDY
`8 QVQLLESGPGIFQPSQTLSLTCSFSGFSLS TDGIGVG WIRQPSGKGLBWLA HI~IVLKS RLTISKDTSNNQVFLKIASVDTADTGTYYCVR
`IRDYYGYAMDY
`
`FR4
`1 WGAGTTVTVSS
`2 WGAGTTVTVSS
`3 WGQGTSVTVSS
`4 WGQGTTLTVSS
`5 WGQGTSVTVSS
`6 WGAGTTVTVSS
`7 WGAGTTVTVSS
`8 WGQGTSVTVSS
`
`FIG. 2. Amino acid sequences of the cloned V regions. Subgroup numbers are indicated in parentheses. (A) Light chains. Sequences: I, Sl07
`(I); 2, 2Ell (II); 3, 2884.2 (II); 4, 39, All.l (II); 5, 48G7 (V); 6, 18R.136.1 (V); 7, AZ-28 (V); 8, 7G12-A10 (V). (B) Heavy chains. Sequences:
`1, 18R.136.1 (IIA); 2, 7G12-A10 (IIA); 3, AZ-28 (liB); 4, 48G7 (II C); 5, 2884.2 (IliA); 6, S107 (IliA); 7, 39,All.l {misc.); 8, 2Ell (misc.). FRl-4,
`framework regions.
`
`BEQ 1042
`Page 3
`
`

`
`11910 Biochemistry: Ulrich et al.
`
`Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995)
`
`time, h
`
`time, h
`
`c
`+P04
`
`3
`
`5
`
`7
`
`9
`
`11
`
`13
`
`24
`
`40
`
`FIG. 3. Time course of antibody expression in shake flasks . .l,
`48G7; e, 18R.136.1. (A) ODsso of the cultures after inoculation at a
`1:200 dilution of an overnight culture. (B) Induction of the PhoA
`promoter, as measured by specific PhoA activity of the periplasmic
`lysates prepared . at the indicated times. The activity [log(OD4os
`units/min)] of a lysate prepared from a culture grown in the presence
`of2.0mM sodium phosphate was -1.64. (C) Western blot of 18R.136.1
`in the periplasmic fractions at the indicated times (20 JLl per lane).
`+ P04, lysate from a culture grown in the presence of 2.0 mM sodium
`phosphate.
`
`coli periplasm. Since the dimers do not bind to the protein G
`affinity column, they do not present a problem for purification.
`Characterization of Chain Combinations. Part of the diver(cid:173)
`sity of the immune response is generated by the random
`combination of heavy and light chains during B-cell develop(cid:173)
`ment. Due to this combinatorial diversity, antibody chains are
`well adapted to associate randomly with each other to form
`stable pairs. The association derives mainly from the interac(cid:173)
`tion between the C regions (37), but the V regions are
`promiscuous enough to allow for random pairings. This prop(cid:173)
`erty is exploited in phage and in vivo expression libraries.
`To test whether the chimeric expression system would
`accommodate pairs of heavy and light chains that were not
`selected to associate with each other during an immunization
`process, chain combinations between 48G7 and the other
`clones were constructed and expressed. In no case was the
`expression of a hybrid clone worse than that of the poor
`partner, indicating that the yield depends to a large degree on
`
`Table 1. Yields and activities of the cloned Fab fragments
`
`Yield, mg/liter
`
`Activity present
`
`Catalysis
`ELISA
`Fermentor
`Shake flask
`Antibody
`+
`+
`2.7 ± 29%
`48G7
`156
`+
`+
`1.6 ± 22%
`54
`AZ-28
`+
`+
`0.34 ± 20%
`20
`18R.136.1
`+
`ND
`0.25 ± 41%
`13
`2Ell
`+
`+
`0.11 ± 17%
`ND
`2884.2
`ND
`ND
`ND
`<0.02
`S107
`+
`+
`7G12-A10*
`56
`1.6
`+
`ND
`39,All.l*
`ND
`1.3
`For shake flasks, the yield after purification is shown, based on four
`cultures grown under identical conditions (mean ± SD as a percentage
`of the mean). For the fermentor, the yield after purification is shown,
`based on one experiment. ND, not determined.
`*Preliminary results based on one culture obtained independently
`(F.E.R., H.D.U., P.G.S., unpublished results).
`
`the expression level of the individual chains and not their
`association. The combinations also revealed which of the
`chains was responsible for the varying expression levels ob(cid:173)
`served. For example, the combination of the AZ-28 heavy
`chain and the 48G7 light chain expressed like AZ-28 itself,
`whereas the reverse combination showed levels comparable to
`48G7, and light chain dimers were no longer observed, indi(cid:173)
`cating that for AZ-28, the heavy chain limits expression. In
`contrast, the poor expression of S107 could not be attributed
`to one of the chains in particular, since neither combination
`with 48G7 resulted in any appreciable increase in expression
`compared to S107 itself. In all other cases, the combinations
`showed expression levels somewhere in between those of the
`two partners. Based on these results, it is likely that the
`chimeric expression system will be suitable for the generation
`of expression libraries by cloning random combinations of V
`regions from the spleen of an immunized mouse without
`significant losses in diversity resulting from insufficient ex(cid:173)
`pression levels.
`Effects of Point Mutations on the Expression Level. Protein
`produced in this system has been used to solve the crystal
`structure of the recombinant Fab fragment of 48G7 to 2.0 A
`(P.A.P. and P.G.S., unpublished results). To better understand
`the mechanism of this antibody a series of amino acid substi(cid:173)
`tutions around the active site was generated. Interestingly,
`although the use of rare codons was avoided in all cases, some
`of the mutations had large effects on the protein yield (Fig. 4 ).
`According to their expression levels, the mutants fell into three
`classes. The Tyr33HHis, His35HAla, His35HGln, and His35HGlu
`mutants, Tyr ~ Phe mutants at positions 99H and 100H, and the
`triple mutation GL48G7H (Asn30LSer /Gly34LSer I
`V K
`HisSSLAsp) all behaved like the wild-type 48G7. The Tyr91LLys,
`Tyr94LAla, Arg96LAla, Arg96LLys, and Tyr100HHis mutants
`showed 2- to 10-fold reductions in expression yields. In contrast
`to the Tyr99HPhe mutant, expression of the other three Tyr99H
`mutants was estimated to be at least 100-fold lower than that of
`wild-type 48G7 and comparable to the level of S107.
`All mutations lie in the complementarity-determining re(cid:173)
`gion (CDR) loops or the {3-strands immediately behind a loop,
`and none of them affect buried residues. Changes from a Tyr
`to a hydrophilic or charged amino acid like His, Arg, or Lys
`occur in all three classes. Most notably, Tyr99H seems to
`accommodate no other change than the conservative replace(cid:173)
`ment with Phe, even though it resides in a highly variable
`solvent-exposed position at the tip of the heavy chain CDR3
`loop. Similar behavior is observed for the Phe and His mutants
`of the adjacent residue, TyriOOH. Tyr91 L, Tyr94L, and Arg96L
`lie in the light chain CDR3 loop, and in the latter case, even
`the conservative change of Arg (which makes a hydrogen bond
`
`... ----
`
`-
`
`FIG. 4. Effects of point mutations on the expression level. Western
`blots were prepared from 25-ml cultures of 48G7 and the indicated
`mutants in pDEI440 (20 JLl per lane) grown in parallel under identical
`conditions. wt, Wild type; GL48G7H = AsnJOLSer/ Gly34LSer/
`His55LAsp.
`
`BEQ 1042
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Biochemistry: Ulrich et a/.
`
`Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995)
`
`11911
`
`to the hapten) to Lys leads to a significant reduction in
`expression level. In contrast, significant changes can be made
`to Tyr-33H and His-3SH in CDRl of the heavy chain without
`significant effects (both residues contact the hapten). One
`possibility is that the E. coli translation machinery might be
`affected by small alterations in the mRNA, as observed by
`Duenas et a/. (38). Alternatively, amino acid substitutions in
`the loops could make the protein thermodynamically unstable,
`thereby rendering it susceptible to proteolytic attack. This
`phenomenon has also been reported by other groups (39, 40).
`Alfthan et al. ( 41) have observed similar correlations of
`expression levels and protease sensitivity with temperature
`stability of Fab fragments that use different murine CHl
`regions. On the other hand, Knappik and Pliickthun (9) found
`positions in the heavy chain loops of the single-chain antibody
`McPC603 that influenced expression efficiency mainly
`through solubility effects without affecting the in vitro stability
`of the protein. The mutations in 48G7 seem to be of a different
`nature, however, since increased amounts of insoluble aggre(cid:173)
`gates, as found by Knappik and Pliickthun (9), were not
`observed in our poorly expressing clones. It is possible that the
`human C regions, which are absent in Pliickthun's system, keep
`even unstable or partly unfolded V regions in solution, thus
`preventing aggregation and allowing proteases to remove the
`unfolded chains. It should be interesting to investigate whether
`the changes in expression titer in our system can indeed be
`correlated with protein stability.
`Conclusion. We have demonstrated that a range of different
`hybridoma-derived antibodies and combinations of heavy and
`light chains not selected as pairs in vivo can be expressed as
`murine-human chimeric Fab fragments in E. coli. This ex(cid:173)
`pression system provides good yields of seven of eight anti(cid:173)
`bodies assayed, and in each case the protein remained in
`soluble form. This chimeric system seems to be a viable
`compromise between the high expression levels of humanized
`antibodies and the low levels observed for murine Fab frag(cid:173)
`ments, while avoiding the risk of losing catalytic activity by
`changing the V regions. Crystallography should be facilitated
`due to the greater homogeneity of the recombinant antibody
`when compared with murine Fab fragments generated by
`papain digestion, and site-directed mutagenesis becomes much
`less complicated, with the caveat of mutation effects on
`expression levels. Most importantly, however, attempts to
`improve the catalytic efficiency of existing antibodies by
`genetic approaches or the selection of catalytic clones from in
`vivo eDNA libraries (3, 4) should now become feasible.
`
`We thank D. Henner, B. Snedecor, M. Yang, and P. Carter
`(Genentech) for valuable discussions. We also thank L. Hsieh and E.
`Driggers for their help with 28B4.2 and AZ-28. P.L.Y. and P.A.P.
`contributed equally to this work. This work was supported by the
`Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy, Ad(cid:173)
`vanced Industrial Concepts Division of the U.S. Department of Energy
`under Contract DE-AC03-76F00098. P.G.S. is a Howard Hughes
`Medical Institute Investigator; H.D.U. is supported by a National
`Science Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship, P.A.P. was supported by
`a Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Cancer Research Fund Fellow(cid:173)
`ship, P.L.Y. is supported by a Howard Hughes Medical Institute
`Predoctoral Fellowship in Biological Sciences, and F.E.R. is supported
`by National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship F32AI09136.
`
`1. Schultz, P. G. & Lerner, R. A. (1993) Ace. Chern. Res. 26,
`391-395.
`2. Lerner, R. A., Benkovic, S. J. & Schultz, P. G. (1991) Science 252,
`659-667.
`3. Smiley, J. A. & Benkovic, S. J. (1994) Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci USA
`91, 8319-8323.
`4. Tang, Y., Hicks, J. B. & Hilvert, D. (1991) Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci.
`USA 88, 8784-8786.
`5. Pliickthun, A. (1991) Bio/Technology 9, 545-551.
`6. La Vallie, E. R., DiBlasio, E. A., Kovacic, S., Grant, K. L., Schen(cid:173)
`del, P. F. & McCoy, J. M. (1993) Bio/Technology 11, 187-193.
`
`7. Buckholz, R. G. & Gleeson, M.A. G. (1991) Bio/Technology 9,
`1067-1072.
`8. Lesley, S. A., Patten, P. A. & Schultz, P. G. (1993) Proc. Nat/.
`Acad. Sci USA 90, 1160-1165.
`9. Knappik, A. & Pliickthun,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket