throbber
BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS
`Volume 16 No.9 (Sept.J994) p.89J-896
`Received as revised 7th July
`
`A STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF SPECIFIC GROWTH RATE AND
`ACETATE ON RECOMBINANT PROTEIN PRODUCTION OF
`ESCHERICHIA COLI JM107
`
`Claire Tumerl *;Malcolm E. Gregory2 and Michael K. Tumerl
`
`1 Advanced Centre for Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place,
`London WCIE 7JE; and 2Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College of
`Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7.
`
`ABSTRACT
`The growth of Escherichia coli in fed-batch and continuous culture is examined and results
`show that a-amylase production is strongly dependent on specific growth rate (dilution rate) of
`the culture and production is greatest at an intermediate rate. Using continuous culture, it has
`also been found that the presence of acetate above a certain concentration reduces both ~max•
`and the production of recombinant protein.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Culture pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen are among the variables which affect growth
`and recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli; each is routinely measured and
`controlled to optimum values. Now that monitoring techniques are more advanced, other
`variables such as specific growth rate, and the concentrations of nutrient sugars and excreted
`metabolites can also be controlled. However, before implementing any control strategy, it is
`important to know what effects these variables might have on a fermentation system.
`
`E. coli cells excrete acetate when they grow rapidly or when the medium contains an excess of
`sugar. Holms (1986) suggested that the production of acetate enables the cells to grow faster,
`by partially uncoupling glycolysis and the TCA cycle. Whatever the reason, acetate is an
`undesirable fermentation product. It disrupts the proton motive force, and inhibits the growth
`of the cells and their ability to produce recombinant protein (Sun et al. 1993; Luli et al. 1990;
`Yang 1992; Pan et al. 1987; George et a/.1992). Furthermore, the effect of acetate on the
`growth of recombinant cells is more marked than on that of host cells (Koh et al. 1992). It is
`therefore important to devise a suitable control strategy, by limiting carbon source feeding, to
`keep acetate concentrations within acceptable limits.
`
`Although the rate of growth and sugar concentration in the medium affect acetate production,
`they also have an effect on recombinant protein production which may be independent of the
`acetate concentration. Thus all the factors need to be examined together. A number of
`researchers have worked on the effect of specific growth rate (dilution rate) in continuous
`culture on the production of recombinant protein (Fu et al. 1993; Nancib et al. 1992; Brown et
`al. 1985; Park et al. 1990) and their results show that product yields were generally higher at
`
`891
`
`BEQ 1038
`Page 1
`
`

`
`low dilution rates. In contrast, little has been reported on the control of specific growth rate in
`fed-batch culture.
`
`This paper examines the role of specific growth rate and acetate concentration on the production
`of recombinant protein in E. coli fermentations, and demonstrates that the effect of these two
`variables is independent. The effect of acetate concentration on the maximum specific growth
`rate of the organism is also discussed.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Organism:
`The organism used in this study was a recombinant Escherichia coli JMI07 carrying the high copy number
`plasmid pQR126 (Bahri and Ward, 1991). The latter contains the genes for a-amylase, which is secreted into
`the periplasm, and for resistance to kanamycin A, which was used for plasmid selection. The lac promoter
`which controls the a-amylase gene is subject to catabolite repression by glucose. For this reason, we used
`galactose as the carbon source in all fermentations.
`Growth media
`The basic medium used for all fermentations contained (g.L-1 ):
`(NH4)zS04, 10; Na2HP04, 2.16; KH2P04, 0.64; NaCI, 5; citnc acid, 0.2; FeS04.1H20, 0.2;
`MgS04.1H20, 0.2; kanamycin, 0.01; thiamine, 0.1; trace element solution, 1mL.L-1.
`The medium also contained the following trace elements (g.L -I):
`CaCI2, 0.001; H3B03, 0.004; MnCI2AH20, 0.002; ZnS04.1H20, 0.002; CuS04.5H20, 0.0004;
`CoCI2.6H20, 0.0004; NaMo04.2H20, 0.0002.
`Galactose was added as described in the text.
`All chemicals were obtained from the Sigma Chemical Company Ltd. The kanamycin A potency was a
`minimum of 750 J.lg.mg-1. Thiamine was present as the hydrochloride.
`
`Fermentation
`Inoculum
`An inoculum of 6.25% by volume, grown from plate colonies for 12 hours at 37°C, 200 rpm in an orbital
`incubator, was added to the fed-batch fermentations.
`Fed-batch
`Fed-batch fermentations were performed in a Chemap 14 L fermenter, with the monitoring and control of
`standard fermentation variables including pH to 7 using 3 M sodium hydroxide and temperature to 37°C. The
`culture was grown aerobically with dissolved oxygen tension (DOT) always greater than 20 %. Galactose (500
`g.L -I) was fed according to algorithms in a process control system described elsewhere (Gregory et al. 1993a,
`1994).
`Continuous culture
`The continuous fermentation was performed in an LH 2000 series 2 litre fermenter. The fermentation medium
`used was that described above, supplemented with galactose (5 g.L-1 ). The dilution rate was varied to set a
`number of different steady states allowing a minimum of 3-5 pot volumes before each steady state was sampled.
`At least three samples were taken at each steady state, and each sample was separated by at least half a pot
`volume ie. 750 mL diluent. In the experiment in which the effect of acetate on specific growth rate was
`determined, acetate was added as sodium acetate in concentrations 2, 5 and 8 g.L-1 to the medium. In the
`experiment in which the effect of acetate on amylase production was determined, acetate was added as a single
`pulse of 7.4 g.L-1 sodium acetate in 15 mL water.
`
`Assay methods
`Determination of maximum specific growth rate (J.lmax)
`The dilution rate (D) was increased to approximately twice the expected value of J.lmax• and the absorbance of the
`fermentation broth was measured at 600 nm every 15 minutes. If the natural logarithm of the optical density is
`plotted against time, the slope (m) is related to J.lmax according to equation I
`J.lmax = D + m (I)
`
`Off-line monitoring and HPLC
`Fermentations were sampled at intervals for measurement of their absorbance at 600 nm, their dry weight and
`their a-amylase activities. Galactose and acetate concentrations were measured in the samples after their
`separation on an HPLC system supplied by LDC and fitted with a refractive index detector. The analytes were
`eluted isocratically from a Biorad Aminex HPX-87H column with a mobile phase comprising 4mM H2S04 at a
`flow rate of 0.65 mL.min-1 at 50°C. The peak areas of acetic acid and galactose were compared to those from
`standard solutions.
`
`892
`
`BEQ 1038
`Page 2
`
`

`
`On-line monitoring and control
`Galactose and acetate were also measured automatically in the fed-batch fermentations using an on-line HPLC
`system which aseptically removes and centrifuges a sample before injecting it onto an HPLC column (Turner et
`al. 1993). The monitoring system was serially linked to a computer running LabView. This is a process
`control system which can program a feeding strategy and alter it in response to the on-line HPLC results
`(Gregory et al. l993b). The system was programmed to feed galactose to cells during fed-batch fermentations at
`exponential rates to give constant specific growth rates of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 h-1. Such rates can be obtained
`provided the cells are not overfed, the galactose input does not exceed the oxidative capacity of the cells, and the
`feed-pump is accurately calibrated and the initial biomass known. Galactose and acetate were monitored on-line
`throughout the. experiments to ensure that the cells were not overfed. If either was detected then the algorithm
`was revised with a new lower estimate of biomass, thus reducing the galactose feed rate.
`a-amylase assay
`The assay for a-amylase was based on the decolourisation of starch-iodine complex. A sample (1 mL) of
`fermentation broth was centrifuged; the supernatant was assayed directly for any extracellular leakage of a(cid:173)
`amylase, and the pellet, after treatment, was assayed for the bound periplasmic enzyme. The latter was released
`with 0.2 mL lysozyme buffer (sucrose 20% w/v, lmM EDTA, 0.2 M tris buffer adjusted to pH7.5 and 0.5
`mg.mL-1 chicken egg white lysozyme obtained from Sigma) in which the pellet was resuspended at 22°C.
`After 10 minutes, 0.2 mL distilled water was added, and finally, after a further 10 minutes, the sample was
`centrifuged. The assays should be performed within 2 hours.
`The a-amylase assay was adapted by Dr Carol French in the department of Biochemistry at UCL from the
`method described by Blanchin-Roland and Massen (1989). Samples of the supernatants were diluted to 0.5 mL
`with 15 mM.sodium phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 5.8, and were mixed with 0.5 mL of the same buffer
`containing 0.5 % soluble starch (obtained from Sigma). The experimental samples were incubated at 500C.
`Portions (50 j.JL) were removed at timed intervals between 0.5 and 15 minutes and were mixed with l mL of a
`solution of iodine in potassium iodide (100 mL 2 % Kl mixed with 0.2 mL 4.4% Kl containing 2 2% 12).
`The absorbances of the resulting mixtures were read at 620 nm.
`A plot of A620 versus time will be linear if the correct sample dilution is used. Typical slopes range from 0.0 l
`to 0.035 absorbance units per minute. One unit of a-amylase activity corresponds to a decrease in absorbance of
`l unit per minute.
`
`RESULTS
`
`The effect of specific erowth rate on a-amylase production
`
`Continuous culture
`The rate at which recombinant E. coli cells produce a-amylase is dependent on the growth rate
`of the organism, which, in continuous culture, is equal to the dilution rate. The fastest
`production rate occurs at about 0.29 h-1 (figure 1) which is intermediate amongst the dilution
`rates tested. It is also well below the maximum specific growth rate (Jl
`) above which
`max
`washout occurs (0.53 h-1). Indeed this latter value is increased to about 0.65 h-1 if the cells are
`grown at a higher dilution rate just below washout for an extended period.
`
`Experiments at increasing dilution rates also show how fast the cells can grow without
`exceeding their oxidative capacity. As the rates are increased, this limit is characterised by their
`excretion of acetate when all the galactose fed to the culture is still consumed. When J.lmax is
`0.53 h-1 this limit is reached at a growth rate of about 0.5 h-1.
`
`Fed-batch culture
`The galactose feed system was programmed with a control algorithm set to achieve specific
`growth rates ofO.l, 0.2 and 0.4 h-1 (see Methods). The actual specific growth rates estimated
`from optical density or dried biomass data, were held between 0.1 and 0.4 h-t (table 1). The
`rate of production of amylase was greatest when the specific growth rate was controlled at 0.2
`
`893
`
`BEQ 1038
`Page 3
`
`

`
`h-1 (table l) and this high level of amylase production was maintained throughout the
`fermentation (figure 2).
`
`It is difficult to compare rates of production in the fed-batch fermentations in which the cell
`concentration changes, with those in continuous culture where the concentration is fixed.
`However, at a biomass concentration in the fed-batch culture of about 2.5 g.L-1, which is
`comparable with that in the continuous culture when it is fed with nutrients containing 5 g.L-1
`galactose, the maximum rates of amylase production appear to be similar in the two
`fermentations (compare figure l and table 1), although the precise specific growth rate at which
`the maximum occurs may be lower in the fed-batch fermentation.
`
`The effect of acetate on cell arowth
`
`When a continuous culture of E. coli JM107 is diluted with feed at a rate sufficient to wash out
`• When these
`the cells, the presence of acetate in the feed medium reduces the measured J.L
`max
`experiments are conducted with normal medium, J.L
`is about 0.65 h-1 (table 2). However, if
`max
`the dilution medium contains 5 g.L-1 acetate J.L
`is reduced by about 12% while at 8 g.L-1,
`max
`the reduction is over 50%. A similar amount of sodium as sodium chloride had no effect,
`implying that the effects were due to the acetate alone.
`
`The effect of acetate on a-amylase production
`
`Acetate in high concentrations is known to reduce the production of recombinant proteins in E.
`coli. Since it is a metabolite which the organism tends to excrete at high growth rates it seemed
`that its effect might not be direct, but linked to growth. When some fed-batch fermentations of
`E. coli JM 107 were fed an excess of galactose, the concentration of acetate rose as high as 7.4
`g.L-1. When this concentration was added as a single pulse to a continuous culture whose
`dilution rate was 0.3 h-1, it unexpectedly caused an increase in the rate of cell growth, and after
`some 40 minutes, a low level of galactose {up to 0.1 g.L- 1) appeared in the medium (figure 3).
`The transitory fall in the growth rate which apparently occurs immediately after adding the
`acetate is probably due to the shock to the cells. It seems that then the cells temporarily used
`the acetate as a source of carbon for growth. After 5 hours, the acetate was either consumed or
`was diluted from the medium and the growth rate returned to its preset value (figure 3).
`
`In contrast to its effect on growth, the added acetate almost completely inhibited the production
`of a-amylase; the amount of enzyme fell almost as rapidly as the theoretical rate of decline due
`to dilution of the culture (figure 4). Although the increase in growth rate to about 0.45 h- 1
`would decrease the rate of synthesis of the recombinant protein, it would still be some 35 % of
`synthesis at a growth rate of 0.3 h-1 (figure I) and it might be more if the effect were only
`transient. Moreover, the production of a-amylase continues as before once the acetate
`concentration has fallen below about 1 g. L-1 even though the growth rate remains above 0.4
`h-1 (figures 3 and 4). We believe that this demonstrates a direct effect of acetate on a-amylase
`production which is not mediated through its effect on the rate of cell growth.
`
`894
`
`BEQ 1038
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Actual specific growth rate (optical density)
`Actual specific growth rate {dry cell weight)
`Specific production rate of ex-amylase
`(units.mL-l.min-1 .(gDCW.L-lyl.h-1)
`
`Controlled specific growth rate h-1
`0.1
`0.2
`0.4
`0.09
`0.18
`0.41
`0.1
`0.2
`0.33
`0.09
`3.4
`1.2
`
`Table 1. Specific growth rates set and those obtained based on dry biomass and optical density data in controlled
`fed-batch fermentations. Specific ex-amylase production rates are given for each growth rate.
`
`ACETATE
`CONCENTRATION (g.L -I)
`0
`2
`5
`8
`
`llmax (h-I)
`
`0.655
`0.67
`0.58
`0.303
`
`%REDUCTION
`IN Jlmax
`0
`0
`11.6
`52.6
`
`Table 2. Summary of experiment in which different concentrations of acetate (as sodium acetate) were added to
`the feed medium in washout experiments in continuous culture. In each case, cells were growing at IJ.max when
`the medium was supplemented with acetate.
`
`. ~·
`
`; -7 2.5
`~ s::.
`g.,.· 20
`~-7 0
`"8~ as 1.5
`., -
`.. c:
`>- E 10
`~-;· 0
`.g-g
`&l ~ 0.5
`a.c:
`"'2.
`
`0.0
`
`0.,
`
`0.3
`0.2
`0.~
`dilution rate (h'1 )
`
`0.5
`
`Figure l. Specific amylase production rates of
`E. coli JMI07 at different dilution rates for a
`continuous culture.
`
`0
`
`2
`
`8
`6
`4
`dry Cell weight (g.l ' 1
`)
`
`10
`
`12
`
`Figure 2. Amylase activity versus dry cell weight
`of samples taken during three fed-batch cultures.
`J1S were controlled at 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 b'1
`•
`
`.r s.
`if
`.. 1
`
`_..J... _
`
`_..J... _
`
`_..J... _ _,_ _ _,f-1--.i
`
`.... i
`
`0.21-_
`•
`
`~ 0
`....
`.:-
`.9'
`0 ~6
`
`-5
`
`5
`0
`time after acetate addition (hours)
`
`20
`
`Figure 3. Acetate and galactose profiles of continuous
`culture after addition of acetate dose (7.4 g.L-1
`).
`Plotted specific growth rate was calculated from the
`optical density increase and the known dilution rate
`of the culture.
`
`20
`5
`0
`-5
`time alter acetate addition (hours)
`
`Figure 4. Amylase profile of a continuous culture
`
`after a dose of acetate (7.4 g.L-1) had been added
`to the fermenter. Also plotted on graph is the amylase
`profile that would result due to dilution effects alone
`if no further amylase had been produced by the cells
`after the acetate addition.
`
`895
`
`BEQ 1038
`Page 5
`
`

`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`The authors would like to thank Dr John Ward and Dr. Carol French for providing the E. coli
`strain, the method for cell fractionation, the adapted a-amylase assay and useful discussions.
`This project was supported jointly by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
`Council and the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council through the IRC in
`Biochemical Engineering at University College and the IRC in Process Systems Engineering,
`Imperial College London. The support of both centres is gratefully acknowledged.
`
`REFERENCES
`Bahri SM, Ward 1M (1990) Cloning and expression of a-amylase gene from Streptomyces thermoviolaceus
`CUB74 in Escherichia coli JMI07 and S. lividans TK24. J Gen Microbioll36: 811-818.
`Blanchin-Roland, S. and Masson, J-M. (1985) Protein secretion controlled by a synthetic gene in Escherichia
`coli.. Protein Eng. 2:473-480.
`Brown SW, Meyer H-P, Fiechter A (1985) Continuous production of human leucocyte interferon with
`Escherichia coli and continuous cell lysis in a two stage chemostat. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 23: 5-9.
`Fu J, Wilson DB, Shuler ML (1993) Continuous high level production and excretion of a plasmid encoded
`protein by Escherichia coli in a two stage chemostat. Biotech Bioeng 4: 937-946.
`George HA, Powell AL, Dahlgren ME, Herber WK, Maigetter RZ, Burgess BW, Stirdivant SM, Greasham R
`( 1992) Physiological effects of TGFa-PE40 expression in recombinant Escherichia coli JMl 07. Biotech Bioeng
`40:437-445.
`Gregory ME, Turner C (1993a) Open-loop control of specific growth rate in fed-batch cultures of recombinant
`Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Tech 7 (12):889-894.
`Gregory ME, Turner C (1993b) Use of on-line HPLC analysis in the control of fed-batch cultures of E. coli
`producing recombinant protein. Proceedings of the 6th. European Conference on Biotechnology. Florence. June
`1993.Vol.2, ppTUl46.
`Gregory ME, Keay PJ, Dean P, Bulmer M, Thornhill, N (1994) A visual programming environment for
`bioprocess control. J Biotechnol 33(2):233-241.
`Holms WH (1986) The central metabolic pathways of Escherichia coli: relationship between flux and control at
`a branch point, efficiency of conversion to biomass and excretion of acetate. Current Topics in Cellular
`Regulation 28:69-105.
`Koh BT, Nakashimada U, Pfeiffer M, Yap MGS (1992) Comparison of acetate inhibition on growth of host and
`recombinant E. coli Kl2 strains. Biotechnol Letts 14 (12): 1115-1118.
`Luli GW and Strohl WR (1990) Comparison of growth, acetate production and acetate inhibition of Escherichia
`coli strains in batch and fed-batch fermentations. Appl Env Microbiol 56 (4): 1004-1011.
`Nancib N, Boudrant J (1992) Effect of growth rate on stability and gene expression of a recombinant plasmid
`during continuous culture of Escherichia coli in a non-selective medium. Biotechnol Letts 14 (8): 643-648.
`Pan JG, Rhee JS, Lebeault JM (1987) Physiological constraints in increasing biomass concentration of
`Escherichia coli B in fed-batch culture. Biotechnol Letts 9 (2): 89-94.
`Park, S. and Ryu, D.D.Y. (1990) Effect of operating parameters on specific production rate of a cloned gene
`product and performance of recombinant fermentation process. Biotech Bioeng 35: 287-295.
`Sun W-J, Lee C, George HA, Powell AL, Dahlgren ME, Greasham R, Park C-H (1993) Acetate inhibition on
`growth of recombinant E. coli and expression of fusion protein TGFa-PE40. Biotechnol Letts 15 (8): 809-814.
`Turner C, Thornhill NF, Fish NM (1993) A novel method for the on-line analysis of fermentation broth using a
`sampling device, microcentrifuge and HPLC. Biotechnol Tech 7 (1): 19-24.
`Yang X-M (1992) Optimisation of a cultivation process for recombinant protein production by Escherichia coli.
`J Biotechnol 23: 271-389.
`
`896
`
`BEQ 1038
`Page 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket