throbber
Pauline M. Doran
`
`ACADEMIC PRESS
`
`Harc'0m'1‘ Brace & Company, Publishers
`London SanDiego NewYo1‘k Boston
`Sydney Tokyo Toronto
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 1
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 1
`
`

`
`ACADEMIC PRESS LIMITED
`
`‘ 24~28 Oval Road
`LONDON NW1 7DX
`
`US. Edition Published by
`ACADEMIC PRESS INC.
`San Diego, CA 92101
`
`;P;_‘‘‘‘' ‘‘;;.t.;.‘,I, .;
`j
`....=.:;::%§ W‘
`.>3-: «2
`
`' This book is printed on acid free paper
`
`Copyright © 1995 ACADEMIC PRESS LIMITED P
`
`All rights reserved
`No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying,
`recording, or any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher
`
`A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
`
`ISBN 0—12—220855-2
`
`ISBN 0- 1 2—220856—0 (pbk)
`
`Typeset by Columns Design & Production Services Ltd, Reading
`Printed in Great Britain by The Bath Press, Avon
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 2
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 2
`
`

`
`This material may be proteded by C0pyrigh1|aw(Tfl|e 17 U_s_ Code)F_
`
`III
`
`Homogeneous Reactions
`
`The heart ofa typical bioprocess is the reactor orfermenter. Flan/eed by unit operations which carry outphysical changesfor
`medium preparation and recovery ofproducts, the reactor is where the major chemical and biochemical transformations
`occur. In many bioprocesses, characteristics ofthe reaction determine to a large extent the economicfeasibility oftheproject.
`
`Of most interest in biological systems are catalytic reactions.
`By definition, a catalyst is a substance which affects the rate of
`reaction without altering the reaction equilibrium or under-
`going permanent change itself. Enzymes, enzyme complexes,
`cell organelles and whole cells perform catalytic roles; the latter
`may be viable or non-viable, growing or non-growing.
`Biocatalysts can be of microbial, plant or animal origin. Cell
`growth is an autocatalytic reaction: this means that the catalyst.
`is a product of the reaction. The performance ofcatalytic reac-
`tions is characterised by variables such as the reaction rate and
`yield of product from substrate. These parameters must be
`taken into account when designing and operating reactors.
`In engineering analysis of catalytic reactions, a distinction
`is made between homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions. A
`reaction is homogeneous if the temperature and all concentra-
`tions in the system are uniform. Most fermentations and
`enzyme reactions carried out in mixed vessels fall into this cat-
`egory. In contrast, heterogeneous reactions take place in the
`presence of concentration or temperature gradients. Analysis
`of heterogeneous reactions requires application of mass-
`transfer principles in conjunction with reaction theory.
`Heterogeneous reactions are treated in Chapter 12.
`This chapter covers the basic aspects of reaction theory
`which allow us to quantify the extent and speed of homo-
`geneous reactions and to identify important factors affecting
`reaction rate.
`
`11.1.1 Reaction Thermodynamics
`
`Consider a reversible reaction represented by the following
`equation:
`'
`
`A+ bB x——‘ yY+zZ.
`
`(11.1)
`
`A, B, Y and Z are chemical species; b, yand zare stoichiometric
`coefficients. If the components are left in a closed system for an
`infinite period of time, the reaction proceeds until thermody-
`namic equilibrium is reached. At equilibrium there is no net
`driving force for further change; the reaction has reached the
`limit of its capacity for chemical transformation in a closed
`system. Composition of the equilibrium mixture is deter-
`mined exclusively by the thermodynamic properties of the
`reactants and products; it is independent of the way the reac-
`tion is executed. Equilibrium concentrations are related by the
`equilibrium constant, K For the reaction of Eq. (1 1.1):
`
`CYeyCZCZ
`[(__ I
`
`CAe CBeb
`
`(11.2)
`
`where CAc, CB6, CYC and Cze are equilibrium concentrations
`ofA, B, Y and Z, respectively. The value of Kdepends on tem-
`perature as follows:
`
`11.1 Basic Reaction Theory
`
`Reaction theory has two fundamental parts: reaction thermody-
`namics and reaction /einetics. Reaction thermodynamics is
`concerned with how fizr the reaction can proceed; no matter
`how fast a reaction is, it cannot continue beyond the point of
`chemical equilibrium. On the other hand, reaction kinetics is
`concerned with the rate at which reactions proceed.
`
`lnK=
`
`~AG;.
`RT
`
`(11.3).
`
`where A G ‘gm is the change in standardfree energy per mole ofA
`reacted, R is the ideal gas constant and Tis absolute tempera-
`ture. Values of R are listed in Table 2.5 (p. 20). The
`superscript ° in A G ‘Am indicates standard conditions. Usually,
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 3
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 3
`
`

`
`258
`II Homogeneous Reactions
` _—
`
`the standard condition for a substance is its most stable form at
`
`AG=AH— TAS.
`
`1 atm pressure and 25°C; however, for biochemical reactions
`occurring in solution, other standard conditions may be used
`[1]. AGE,“ is equal to the difference in stzzndardflee energy of
`fbrmzztion, G°, between products and reactants:
`
`AG;’m= yG§+zG%— G1‘,’(— /7 GE.
`~
`
`(111.4)
`
`Therefore, from Eq. (1 1.3):
`
`in K:
`
`-AH:..— +
`RT
`
`A55...
`R
`
`-
`
`(11.5)
`
`(11.6)
`
`Standard free energies offormation are available in handbooks
`such as those listed in Section 2.6.
`
`Free energy G is related to enthalpy H, entropy S and
`absolute temperature Tas follows:
`
`for exothermic reactions with negative AH;m, K
`Thus,
`decreases with increasing temperature. For endothermic reac-
`tions and positive AHgm, K increases with temperature.
`
`Example 11.1 Effect of temperature on glucose isomerisation
`
`Glucose isomerase is used extensively in the USA for production of high—fructose syrup. The reaction is:
`
`8
`
`lucose 4% fructose.
`
`AH;m for this reaction is 5.73 k] gmol”; ASfxn is 0.0176 k] gmol” K_1.
`
`(a) Calculate the equilibrium constants at 50°C and 75°C.
`(b) A company aims to develop a sweeter mixture of sugars, i.e. one with a higher concentration of fructose. Considering
`1 equilibrium only, would it be more desirable to operate the reaction at 50°C or 75°C?
`
`Solution:
`
`(a) Convert temperatures to degrees Kelvin (K) using the formula of Eq. (2.24):
`
`T: 5o°c=323.15 K
`
`T: 75°c=34s.15 K.
`
`From Table 2.5, R: 8.3144Jgmol”1 K-1: 8.3144 x 10-3 k] gmorl K“1. Using Eq. (11.6)
`__
`-1
`
`In K (50°C) :
`
`5.73 k] gmol
`(33144 x 10‘5kJgmol”1K”1)(323.15K)
`
`+
`
`K(50°C) = 0.98.
`
`Similarly for T= 75°C:
`
`0.0176 k]gmol_1K"1
`
`8.3144 X 10'5 k]gmol”1K_1
`
`In K 05°C) :
`
`-1
`_
`5.75 k] gmol
` _..___ +
`(83144 x 10"3 k]gmo1‘1K”1) (348.15K)
`
`0.0176 k] gmol_1 K”
`
`8.3144 X 1073 k] gmol_1 K71
`
`g<(75°c) =1.15.
`
`(b) As Kincreases, the fraction of fructose in the equilibrium mixture increases. Therefore, from an equilibrium point ofview,
`it is more desirable to operate the reactor at 75°C. However, other factors such as enzyme deactivation at high temperatures
`should also be considered.
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 4
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 4
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`A limited number ofcommercially—important enzyme conver-
`sions, such as glucose isomerisation and starch hydrolysis, are
`treated as reversible reactions. In these systems, the reaction
`mixture at equilibrium‘ contains significant amounts of reac-
`tants as well as products. However, for many reactions A Gfxn is
`negative and large in magnitude. As a result, K is also very
`large, the reaction favours the products rather than the reac—
`tants, and the reaction is regarded as irreverriole. Most enzyme
`and cell reactions fall into this category. For example, the equi-
`librium constant for sucrose hydrolysis by invertase is about
`104; for fermentation of glucose to ethanol and carbon diox-
`ide, K is about 1030. The equilibrium ratio of products to
`reactants is so overwhelmingly large for these reactions that
`they are considered to proceed to completion, i.e. the reaction
`stops only when the concentration of one of the reactants falls
`to zero. Equilibrium thermodynamics has therefore only lim-
`ited application to enzyme and cell reactions. Moreover, the
`thermodynamic principles outlined in this section apply only
`to closed systems; true thermodynamic equilibrium does not
`exist in living cells which exchange matter with their sur—
`roundings. Metabolic processes in cells are in a dynamic state;
`products formed are constantly removed or broken down so
`that reactions are driven forward. Most reactions in biological
`systems proceed to completion in a finite period of time at a
`finite rate.
`
`If we know that complete conversion will eventually take
`place, the most useful reaction parameter to know is the rate at
`which the transformation proceeds. Another important char—
`acteristic, especially for systems in which many different
`reactions take place at the same time, is the proportion of reac-
`tant that is converted to the desired products. These properties
`of reactions are discussed in the remainder of this chapter.
`
`1 1.1.2 Reaction Yield
`
`The extent to which reactants are converted to products is
`expressed as the reaction yield Generally speaking, yield is the
`amount of product formed for accumulated per amount of
`reactant provided or consumed. Unfortunately, there is no
`strict definition of yield; several different yield parameters are
`applicable in different situations. The terms used to express
`yield in this text do not necessarily have universal acceptance
`and are defined here for our convenience. Be prepared for
`other books to use different definitions.
`
`Consider the simple enzyme reaction:
`
`L—histidine —> urocanic acid + NH3
`
`catalysed by histidase. According to the reaction stoichiometry,
`1 gmol urocanic acid is produced for each gmol L—histidine
`consumed; the yield of urocanic acid from histidine is there-
`fore 1 gmol gmol‘1. However, let us assume that the histidase
`used in this reaction is contaminated with another enzyme,
`histidine decarboxylase. Histidine decarboxylase catalyses the
`following reaction:
`
`L—histidine —> histamine + CO2.
`1
`
`(1 1.8)
`
`If both enzymes are active, some L—histidine will react with
`histidase according to Eq.
`(11.7), While some will be
`decarboxylated according to Eq. (11.8). After addition of the
`enzymes to the substrate, analysis of the reaction mixture
`shows that 1 gmol urocanic acid and 1 gmol histamine are
`produced for every 2 gmol-histidine consumed. The observed
`or apparent yield of urocanic acid from L—histidine
`is
`1 8m°l/2 gmol = 0.5 gmol gmol”1. The observed yield of
`0.5 gmol gmol"1 is different from the stoic/aiometric, true or
`theoretical yield of 1 gmol gmol‘1 calculated from reaction
`stoichiometry because the reactant was channelled in two
`separate reaction pathways. An analogous situation arises if
`product rather that reactant is consumed in other reactions;
`the observed yield ofproduct would be lower than the theoret~
`ical yield. W/yen reactants orproducts are involved in additional
`reactions, the observedyield may be dzflerentfiom the t/oeoretieal
`yield.
`The above analysis leads to two useful definitions of yield for
`reaction systems:
`
`(true, stoichiometric or) __
`
`theoretical yield
`
`< total mass or moles of)
`product formed
`
`mass or moles of reactant used
`
`-
`
`to form that particular product
`
`(11.9)
`
`and
`
`< observed or
`
`_ t>.
`apparent yield _
`total mass or moles of reactant
`consumed
`
`(11.10)
`
`There is a third type of yield applicable in certain situations.
`For reactions with incomplete conversion of reactant, it may
`be of interest to specify the amount of product formed per
`amount of reactant provided to the reaction rather than actually
`consumed. For example, consider the isomerisation reaction
`catalysed by glucose isomerase:
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 5
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 5
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`g
`
`lucose ,——" fructose.
`
`(11.11)
`
`stoichiometry, formation of 1 gmol fructose requires 1 gmol
`glucose. The observedyieldwould also be 1 gmol gmol‘1 if the
`reaction occurs in isolation. However if the reaction is started
`
`The reaction is carried out in a closed reactor with
`
`ureP
`
`enzyme. At equilibrium the sugar mixture contains 55 mol%
`lucose and 45 mol% fructose. The theoretical
`ield of
`g
`.7
`fructose from lucose is
`1 mol mol‘1 because,
`from
`g
`g
`g
`
`with glucose present only, the equilibrium yield of fructose
`per gmol glucose added to the reactor is 0.45 gmol gm0l”1.
`This type of yield for incomplete reactions may be-denoted
`groxsyield.
`
`Example 11.2 Incomplete enzyme reaction
`
`An enzyme catalyses the reaction:
`
`A # B.
`
`At equilibrium, the reaction mixture contains 63 Wt% A.
`
`(a) What is the equilibrium constant?
`(b) If the reaction starts with A only, What is the equilibrium yield of B from A?
`
`Solution:
`
`(a) From stoichiometry the molecular weights ofA and B must be equal: therefore Wt% = mol%. From Eq. (1 1.2):
`
`K:
`
`CBC
`C
`
`CA
`
`Using a basis ofl gmol 1” 1, CAC is 0.63 gmol l”1 and CB6 is 0.37 gmol lF1. The value ofKtherefore is 057/063 = 0.59.
`(b) From stoichiometry, the true yield of B from A is 1 gmol gmol_1. However the gross yield is 037/10 = 0.37 gmol gmol” 1.
`
`11.1.3 Reaction Rate
`
`Consider the general irreversible reaction:
`
`aA+ B —> yY+zZ.
`
`system, M0 is mass flow rate out of the system, RG is mass rate
`of generation by reaction and RC is mass rate of consumption
`by reaction. Let us apply Eq. (6.5) to compound A, assuming
`that the reaction of Eq. (11.12) is the only reaction taking
`place that involves A. Rate of consumption RC is equal to R ,
`and RC = 0. The mass—balance equation becomes:
`
`(11.12)
`
`The rate ofthis reaction can be represented by the rate ofconver-
`sion of compound A; let us use the symbol RA to denote the rate
`ofreaction with respect toA. RA has units of, for example kg s”1.
`How do we measure reaction rates? For a general reaction
`system, rate of reaction is related to rate of change of mass in
`the system by the unsteady—state mass—balance equation
`derived in Chapter 6:
`
`dM A
`TA=MAi —MA0 “ RA‘
`
`(11.13)
`
`Therefore, rate ofreaction RA can be determined ifwe measure
`the rate of change in mass ofAA, dMA/d1, and the rates of flow of
`A in and out Aof the systern,MAi and MA0. In a dorm’ system
`where MN = MAO = 0, Eq. (11.13) becomes:
`
`In'Eq (6.5), Mis mass, tis time,
`
`is mass flow rate into the
`
`(6-5)
`
`—dM
`dtA
`
`RA 2
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 6.
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 6
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`and reaction rate is measured simply by monitoring the change
`in mass ofA in the system. Most measurements of reaction rate
`are carried out in closed systems so that the data can be analysed
`according to Eq. (11.14). dMA/dt is negative when A is con-
`sumed by reaction; therefore the minus sign in Eq. (11.14) is
`necessary to make RA a positive quantity. Rate of reaction is
`sometimes called reaction velocity. Reaction velocity can also be
`measured in terms ofcomponents B, Y or Z. In a closed system:
`
`—dM
`RB="“B
`
`dM
`’*Y="d7Y
`
`dM
`RZ=TZ
`
`(11.15)
`
`where M , MY and M2 are masses of B, Y and Z, respectively.
`When reporting reaction rate, the reactant being monitored
`should be specified. Because RY and R2 are based on product
`accumulation, these reaction rates are called production rate: or
`productivity.
`Eqs (11.14) and (11.15) define the rate of reaction in a
`closed system. However, reaction rate can be expressed using
`different measurement bases. In bioprocess engineering there
`are three distinct ways of expressing reaction rate which can be
`applied in different situations.
`
`(1)
`
`Total rote. Total reaction rate is defined in Eqs (11.14)
`and (11.15) and is expressed as either mass or moles per
`unit time. Total rate is useful for specifying the output of a
`particular reactor or manufacturing plant. Production
`rates for factories are often expressed as total rates; for
`example: ‘The production rate is 100 000 tonnes per year’.
`If additional reactors are built so that the reaction volume
`
`in the plant is increased, then clearly the total reaction rate
`would increase. Similarly, if the amount of cells or enzyme
`used in each reactor were also increased, then the total pro-
`duction rate would be improved even further.
`Volumetric rote. Because the total mass of reactant con-
`
`verted in a reaction mixture depends on the size of the
`system, it is often convenient to specify reaction rate as
`the rate per unit volume. Units ofvolumetric rate are, e.g.
`kg m_5 s_1. Rate of reaction expressed on a volumetric
`basis is used to account for differences in volume between
`
`reaction systems. Therefore, if the reaction mixture in a
`closed system has Volume I/:
`
`RA _ —1dMA
`Tf
`dt
`V
`
`VA:
`
`(11.16)
`
`(11.17)
`
`where CA is the concentration of A in units of, e.g.
`kg m"3. Volumetric rates are particularly useful for com-
`paring the performance of reactors of different size. A
`common objective in optimising reaction processes is to
`maximise volumetric productivity so that the desired
`total production rate can be ‘achieved with reactors of
`minimum size and therefore minimum cost.
`
`Specific rote. Biological reactions involve enzyme and cell
`catalysts. Because the total rate of conversion depends on
`the amount of catalyst present, it is sometimes useful to
`specify reaction rate as the rate per quantity of enzyme or
`cells involved in the reaction. In a closed system, specific
`reaction rate can be measured as follows:
`
`(11.18)
`
`where rA is the specific rate ofreaction with respect to A, X
`is the quantity of cells, E is the quantity of enzyme and
`‘IMA/dtis the rate of change of mass ofA in the system. As
`quantity of cells is usually expressed as mass, units of spe-
`cific rate for a cell—catalysed reaction would be, e.g. kg
`(kg cells)_1 sil or simply ST1. On the other hand, the
`mass of a particular enzyme added to a reaction is rarely
`known; most commercial enzyme preparations contain
`several components in unknown and variable proportions
`depending on the batch obtained from the manufacturer.
`To overcome these difficulties, enzyme quantity is often
`expressed as units of activity measured under specified
`conditions. One unit of enzyme is usually taken as the
`amount which catalyses conversion of 1 pmol substrate
`per minute at the optimal temperature, pH and substrate
`concentration. Therefore, if E in Eq. (11.18) is expressed
`as units of enzyme activity, the specific rate of reaction
`under process conditions could be reported as, e.g. kg
`(unit enzyme)—1 sil.
`In a closed system where the
`volume of reaction mixture remains constant, an alterna-
`
`tive expression for specific reaction rate is:
`
`1
`
`“A: "<7 7)?!‘
`
`1
`
`CIC
`
`where rA is the volumetric rate of reaction with respect to
`A. When Vis constant, Eq. (11.16) can be written:
`
`where x is cell concentration and e is enzyme concentration.
`
`(11.19)
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 7
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 7
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`Volumetric and total rates are not a direct reflection of cata-
`
`this is represented by the specific rate.
`lyst performance;
`Specific rates are employed when comparing different cells or
`enzymes. Specific rate is the rate achieved per unit catalyst and,
`under usual circumstances, is not dependent on the size of the
`system or the amount ofcatalyst present. Some care is necessary
`when interpreting results for reaction rate. For example, if two
`_ fermentations are carried out with different cell lines and the
`volumetric rate of reaction is greater in the first fermentation
`than in the second, you should notjump to the conclusion that
`the cell line in the first experiment is ‘better’, or capable of
`greater metabolic activity. It could be that the faster Volumetric
`rate is due to the first fermenter being operated at a higher cell
`density than the second, leading to measurement of a more
`rapid rate per unit volume. Different strains of organism
`should be compared in terms ofspecific reaction rates.
`Total, volumetric and specific productivities are inter-
`related concepts in process design. For example, high total
`productivity could be achieved with a catalyst of low specific
`activity if the reactor is loaded with a high catalyst concentra-
`tion. If this is not possible, the volumetric productivity will be
`relatively low and a larger reactor is required to achieve the
`desired total productivity. In this book, the symbol RA will be
`used to denote total reaction rate with respect to component
`A; rA represents either volumetric or specific rate.
`
`influence reaction rate, such as temperature. When the kinetic
`equation has the form of Eq. (11.20), the reaction is said to be
`of oroierawith respect to component A and order [7 with respect
`to B. The order of the overall reaction is (a+ 12). It is not usually
`possible to predict the order of reactions from stoichiometry.
`The mechanism of single reactions and the functional form of
`the kinetic expression must be determined by experiment. The
`dimensions and units of /edepend on the order of the reaction.
`
`11.1.5 Effect of Temperature on Reaction
`Rate
`
`Temperature has a significant kinetic effect on reactions.
`Variation of the rate constant kwith temperature is described
`by the Arrhenius equation:
`
`k=Ae—E/RT
`
`(11.21)
`
`where k is the rate constant, A is the Arr/aenins constant or fre-
`qnencyfizctor, Eis the activation energy for the reaction, R is the
`ideal gas constant, and Tis absolute temperature. Values of R
`are listed in Table 2.5 (p. 20). According to the Arrhenius
`equation, as Tincreases, kincreases exponentially. Taking the
`natural logarithm of both sides of Eq. (1 1.21):
`
`11.1.4 Reaction Kinetics
`
`lnk=ln/1 —
`
`RT
`
`As reactions proceed, the concentrations of reactants decrease.
`In general, rate of reaction depends on reactant concentration
`so that the specific rate of conversion decreases simultaneous:
`ly. Reaction rate also varies with temperature; most reactions
`speed up considerably as the temperature rises. Reaction
`/einetics refers to the relationship between rate of reaction and
`conditions which affect reaction velocity, such as reactant
`concentration and temperature. These relationships are con-
`veniently described using /einetic ‘expressions or kinetic
`eqnationx.
`irreversible reaction of Eq.
`Consider again the general
`(1 1.12). Often but not always, the volumetric rate of this reac-
`tion can be expressed as a function of reactant concentrations
`using the following mathematical form:
`
`rA= k C; C;
`
`(11.20)
`
`where /eis the rate constant or rate coefiicient for the reaction. By
`definition, the rate constant is independent of the concentra-
`tion of reacting species but is dependent on other variables that
`
`(11.22)
`
`Thus, a plot of ln /e versus 1/Tgives a straight line with slope
`-5/R. For many reactions the value of E is positive and large,
`indicating a rapid increase in reaction rate with temperature.
`
`1 1.2 Calculation of Reaction Rates From
`Experimental Data
`
`As outlined in Section 11.1.3, the volumetric rate of reaction
`
`in a closed system can be found by measuring the rate of
`change in the mass of reactant present, provided the reactant is
`involved in only one reaction. Most kinetic studies of biolog-
`ical reactions are carried out in closed systems with a constant
`volume of reaction mixture; therefore, Eq. (1 1.17) can be used
`to evaluate the volumetric reaction rate. The concentration of
`
`a particular reactant or product is measured as a function of
`time. For a reactant such as A in Eq. (11.12), the results will be
`similar to those shown in Figure 11.1(a); the concentration
`will decrease with time. The vo_lumetric rate of reaction is
`equal to dc/\/dt, which can be evaluated as the slope of a
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 8
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 8
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`(a) Change in reactant concentration with time during reaction. (b) Graphical differentiation ofconcentration
`Figure 11.1
`data by drawing a tangent.
`
`Slope of tangent:
`reaction rate at I,
`
`smooth curve drawn through the data points. The slope of the
`curve in Figure 11.1(a) changes with time; the reaction' rate is
`greater at the beginning of the experiment than at the end.
`One obvious way to determine reaction rate is to draw tan-
`gents to the curve ofFigure 1 1.1(a) at Various times and evaiuate
`the slopes of the tangents; this is shown in Figure 1 1.1 Ifyou
`have ever attempted this you will know that it can be extremely
`difficult, even though correct in principle. Drawing tangents to
`curves is a highly subjective procedure prone to great inaccur— .
`acy, even with special drawing devices designed for the purpose.
`The results depend strongly on‘ the way the data are smoothed
`and the appearance of the curve at the points chosen. More reli-
`able techniques are available for grap/aieai cliflerentiation of rate
`data. Graphical differentiation is valid only if the data can be
`presumed to differentiate smoothly.
`
`Table 11.1 Graphical differentiation using the average
`rate—equal area construction
`
`Time
`
`(1: min)
`
`Oxygen
`concentration
`
`ACA
`
`At
`
`ACA/At
`
`dCA/dt
`
`(CA, ppm)
`8.00
`7.55
`7.22
`6.96
`6.76
`6.61
`6.49
`6.33
`6.25
`
`0.0
`1.0
`2.0
`3.0
`4.0
`5.0
`6.0
`8.0
`10.0
`
`-0.45
`-0.33
`-0.26
`-0.20
`-0.15
`-0.12
`--0.16
`-0.08
`
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`2.0
`2.0
`
`-0.45
`-0.33
`-0.26
`-0.20
`-0.15
`-0.12
`-0.08
`-0.04
`
`-0.59
`-0.38
`-0.29
`-0.23
`-0.18
`-0.14
`-0.11
`-0.06
`-0.02
`
`11.2.1 Average Rate—Equal Area Method
`
`This technique for determining rates is based on the average
`rate—equal area construction, and will be illustrated using data
`for oxygen uptake by immobilised cells. Results from measure-
`ment of oxygen concentration in a closed system as a function
`of time are listed in the first two columns ofTable 11.1.
`
`(i) Tabulate values of ACA and At for each time interval as
`shown in Table 1 1.1. A CA values are negative because CA
`decreases over each interval.
`
`(ii) Calculate average oxygen uptake rates, AC!‘/A, for each
`time interval.
`
`(iii)
`Plot ACA/At on linear graph paper. Over each time inter-
`V val a horizontal line is drawn to represent ACA/Atfor that.
`interval; this is shown in Figure 1 1.2.
`V
`Draw a smooth curve to cut the horizontal lines in such a
`manner that the shaded areas above and below the curve
`
`(iv)
`
`are equal for each time interval. The curve thus developed
`gives values of ‘ICA/dt for all points in time. Results for
`dc!‘/dt at the times of sampling can be read from the curve
`and are tabulated in Table 1 1.1.
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 9
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 9
`
`

`
`11. Homogeneous Reactions
`
`Figure 11.2 Graphical differentiation using the average
`rate—equal area construction.
`
`Figure 11.3 Average rate—equal area method for data with
`experimental error.
`
`:7 II
`0-0:
`012345678910
`
`I
`I
`012345678910
`
`Time (min)
`
`Time (min)
`
`A disadvantage of the average rate—equal area method is that it
`is not easily applied if the data show scatter. if the concentra—
`tion measurements are not very accurate, the horizontal lines
`representing ACA/Atmay be located as shown in Figure 11.3.
`Ifwe were to draw a curve equalising areas at each ACA/Arline,
`the rate curve would show complex behaviour oscillating up
`and down as indicated by the dashed line in Figure 11.3.
`Experience suggests that this is not a realistic representation of
`reaction rate. Because of the inaccuracies in measured data, we
`
`need several concentration measurements to define a change
`in rate. The data of Figure 11.3 are better represented using a
`smooth curve to_equalise as far as possible the areas above and
`below adjacent groups of horizontal lines. For data showing
`even greater scatter, it may be necessary to average consecutive
`pairs ofACA/Atvalues to simplify graphical analysis.
`
`A second graphical differentiation technique for evaluating
`dCA/dr is described below.
`
`11.2.2 Mid—Point Slope Method
`
`In this method, the raw data are smoothed and values tabulat—
`
`ed at intervals. The mid—point slope method is illustrated
`using the data of Table 1 1.1.
`
`(i)
`
`Plot the raw data and smooth by hand. This is shown in
`Figure 11.4.
`(ii) Mark off the smoothed curve at time intervals of 8. 8
`should be chosen so that the number of inteivals is less
`
`the less
`than the number of data points measured;
`accurate the data the fewer should be the intervals. In this
`example, sis taken as 1.0 min until t: 6 min; thereafter 8
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 10
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 10
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`Figure 11.4 Graphical differentiation using the mid—point
`slope method.
`
`smoothed curve. When t= 6 min, 8= 1.0; concentrations
`for the difference calculation are read from the curve at
`t - E = 5 min and t+ 8= 7 min. For the last rate deter-
`mination at 1f: 8 min, S= 2.0 and the concentrations are
`read from the curve at t -* 8= 6 min and t+ £= 10 min.
`
`(iv) The slope or rate is determined using the central—differ—
`ence formula:
`
`[(CA)t+e“ (CA)t—e1
`
`RCA) t+8 T (CA) t—s]
`2 8
`
`'
`
`Time (min)
`
`Table 11.2 Graphical differentiation using the mid—point
`slope method
`
`Time
`
`(t, min)
`
`Oxygen
`concentration
`
`[(CA)t+8_ A)r~e]
`
`dCA/dt
`
`0.0
`1.0
`2.0
`3.0
`4.0
`5.0
`6.0
`8.0
`10.0
`
`(Cm PPH1)
`8.00
`7.55
`7.22
`6.96
`6.76
`6.61
`6.49
`6.33
`6.25
`
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`2.0
`2.0
`
`= 2.0 min. The intervals are marked in Figure 11.4 as
`dashed lines. Values of 8 are entered in Table 1 1.2.
`
`In the mid—point slope method, rates are calculated mid-
`way between two adjacent intervals of size 6. Therefore,
`the first rate determination is made for
`t = 1 min.
`
`from
`[(CA) H8 — (CA) t_ 8]
`Calculate the differences
`Figure 11.4, where (CA) “S denotes the concentration of
`A at time t+ 8, and (CA) t“ 8 denotes the concentration at
`time t— 8. A difference calculation is illustrated in Figure
`11.4 for t== 3 min. Note that the concentrations are not
`
`taken from the list of original data but are read from the
`
`(11.23)
`
`These results are listed in Table 11.2.
`
`Values of dCA/dt calculated using the two differentiation
`methods compare favourably. Application of both methods
`allows checking of the results.
`
`1 1.3 General Reaction Kinetics For
`Biological Systems
`
`The kinetics ofmany biological reactions are either zero—order,
`first—order or a combination of these called Michaelis—Menten
`
`kinetics. Kinetic expressions for biological systems are exam-
`ined in this section.
`
`11.3.1 Zero—Order Kinetics
`
`If a reaction obeys zero—order kinetics, the reaction rate is inde-
`pendent of reactant concentration. The kinetic expression is:
`
`“A: /30
`
`(11.24)
`
`where VA is the volumetric rate ofreaction with respect to A and
`k0 is the zero—order rate constant. ko as defined in Eq. (1 1.24) is a
`volumetric rate constant with units of, e.g. kgmol m_3 s_1.
`Because the volumetric rate of a catalytic reaction depends on
`the amount ofcatalyst present, when Eq. (1 1.24) is used to rep-
`resent the rate of a cell or enzyme reaction, the value of /co
`includes the effect of catalyst concentration as well as the
`specific rate of reaction. We could write:
`
`/e0=k6e or k0=k6'x
`
`>
`
`(11.25)
`
`where 1% is the specific zero—order rate constant for enzyme
`reaction and e is
`the concentration of enzyme. Corres-
`pondingly, for cell reaction, k8 is the specific zero—order rate
`constant and xis cell concentration.
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 11
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 11
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`Let us assume we have collected concentration data for a
`
`particular reaction, and wish to determine the appropriate
`kinetic constant. If the reaction takes place in a closed, con—
`stant—volume system, rate of reaction can be evaluated directly
`as the rate of change in reactant concentration using the meth-
`ods for graphical differentiation described in Section 11.2.
`From Eq. (11.24), if the reaction is zero—order the rate will be
`constant and equal to ko at all times during the reaction.
`Because the kinetic expression for zero—order reactions is rela-
`tively simple, rather than differentiate the concentration data
`it is easier to integrate Eq. (11.24) with rA = ”dCA/dt to obtain
`
`Example 11.3 Kinetics of oxygen uptake
`
`an equation for CA as a function of time. The experimental
`data can then be checked directly against the integrated equa-
`tion. Integrating Eq. (11.24) with initial condition CA = CA0
`at t“: 0 gives:
`
`CA= i—rAdt = CA0 — /eot.
`
`(11.26)
`
`Therefore, when‘ the reaction is zero order, a plot of CA versus
`time gives a straight line with slope — k0. Application of Eq.
`(1 1.26) is illustrated in Example 1 1.3.
`
`Serrntizz marcescens is cultured in minimal medium in a small stirred fermenter. Oxygen consumption is measured at a cell con—
`centration of22.7 g 1-1 dry weight.
`
`Time
`
`(min)
`
`0
`2
`5
`8
`10
`12
`15
`
`Oxygen concentration
`(mmol 1- 1)
`
`0.25
`0.23
`0.21
`0.20
`0.18
`0.16
`0.15
`
`(a) Determine the rate constant for oxygen uptake.
`(b) Ifthe cell concentration is reduced to 12 g 1“ 1, what is the value of the rate constant?
`
`Solution:
`
`(a) As indicated in Section 9.5.1, microbial oxygen consumption is a zero—order reaction over a wide range of oxygen concen-
`trations above Ccfit. To test if the measured data can be fitted using the zero—order model of Eq. (11.26), plot oxygen
`concentration as a function of time as shown in Figure 11133.1.
`
`Figure 11133.1 Kinetic analysis of oxygen uptake.
`
`
`
`
`
`Oxygenconcentration(mol1'‘)
`
`.9NJ
`
`.0
`
`10
`
`Time (min)
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 12
`
`BEQ 1031
`Page 12
`
`

`
`II Homogeneous Reactions
`
`(b) For cells of the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket