throbber
[J. Ferment. Techno!., Vol. 66, No. 2, 187-191. 1988]
`
`Fed-Batch Cultures of Recombinant Escherichia coli with
`Inhibitory Substance Concentration Monitoring
`
`NO RIO SHIMIZU*, SHINICHI FuKuzoNo, KIYOSHI FuJIMORI,
`NOBUKO NISHIMURA, and YOJI 0DAWARA
`
`Advanced Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd., 280, Higashikoigakubo 1-chome,
`Kokubunji-shi, Tokyo 185, Japan
`
`Fed-batch cultures of recombinant Escherichia coli HBIOl were investigated to obtain
`high cell density and large amounts of p-galactosidase (P-gal). E. coli HBIOl was
`transformed with a hybrid plasmid pTREZl, which contained a P-gal gene controlled
`by the trp promoter.
`In fed-batch cultures of recombinant E. coli, when the cell con(cid:173)
`centration reached around 13 g/1, the cell growth stopped and large amounts of inhibitory
`substances have accumulated in the broth. These inhibitory substances were isolated
`and identified. Acetate produced by the cells was evidently the main inhibitor of cell
`growth and p-gal production. Since the cells proved to assimilate acetate, the feed rate
`was controlled with acetate concentration monitoring in the fed-batch culture. As
`a result, the acetate concentration was maintained at a low level and cells grew smoothly
`without acetate-induced inhibition. Cell concentration and p-gal quantity reached
`high values of28 g/1 and 64 U/ml, respectively.
`
`technology allows
`Recombinant DNA
`large-scale production of valuable materials
`which otherwise might only be obtained in
`minute quantities
`from natural sources.
`And studies on highly-concentrated cell
`cultivation and high levels of expression for
`cloned genes are very important to obtain
`large amounts of valuable materials using
`host cells harboring hybrid plasmids.
`Highly-concentrated cultivation of recom(cid:173)
`binant Escherichia coli by fed-batch cultures
`was investigated to achieve overproduction
`of heterologous proteins. Fed-batch cultures 1>
`and dialysis cultures 2> for E. coli B have
`already yielded high cell densities of 125 gfl
`and 144 gjl, respectively.
`In
`this study,
`E. coli HBlOl harboring the hybrid plasmid
`pTREZl, which contained a p-galactosidase
`(p-gal) gene controlled by the trp promoter,
`was used as a
`recombinant. Fed-batch
`cultures were used to obtain high cell density
`and large amounts of p-gal.
`
`* Corresponding author
`
`This study deals with inhibitory substances
`produced by recombinant E. coli and fed(cid:173)
`batch cultures with acetate concentration
`monitoring
`for overproduction of gene
`products.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Bacterial strains and plasmid DNA
`E. coli
`HBlOl was used as a carrier for the recombinant
`plasmid pTREZJ.Sl pTREZl carries
`the coding
`sequence for a large part of P-gal, joined to the sequence
`for eight N-terminal amino acids of the trp E poly(cid:173)
`peptide.
`The E. coli strain harboring plasmid
`Cultivation
`pTREZ1 was cultivated in M9 medium containing
`2.5 gfl casamino acids, 5 g/l glucose, 1.5 gfl yeast
`extract, 0.1 g/l proline, 0.1 gfl thiamine HCl, 20 mgtl
`tryptophan, and 50 mg/l ampicillin. Cultures were
`placed in 0.5-l shake flasks closed with cotton plugs
`(working volume 0.05/). They were shaken on
`a
`reciprocal shaker at 115 oscillations/min with
`a 7-cm stroke at 37°C, Fed-batch cultures were grown
`in a 5-l jar fermentor with a 2-1 initial working volume,
`including a 200-ml overnight seed culture, and 0.2 m1
`of antifoam
`(1705-W, Lion Co. Ltd.). pH was
`
`BEQ 1028
`Page 1
`
`

`
`188
`
`SHIMIZU et a[.
`
`[J. Ferment. Technol.,
`
`c
`
`l6
`
`; ~~~\\\\\\\\1\\\\\\\\\~
`14 12
`' m ~4
`u
`
`maintained at 7, temperature at 37°C, gas flow rate at
`2 l(min, and agitation speed at 400--1000 rpm. Aque(cid:173)
`ous ammonia (6 N) was used to adjust pH. The
`dissolved oxygen (DO) level was manually controlled
`at 1-3 ppm by changing the agitation speed. When
`the agitation speed reached the maximum of 1000 rpm,
`50% oxygen gas was supplied to the fermentor instead
`of air. The feeding medium consisted of 200 gfl
`glucose, 100 g/l casamino acids, 60 gfl yeast extract,
`0.4 gfl tryptophan, and 0.1 gfl ampicillin, at pH 7.0.
`Analysis
`fl-Gal activity, glucose concentration,
`and cell concentration were assayed as described
`previously. 3 > Acetate concentration was measured
`with an isotachophoretic analyzer (Model IP-2A,
`Shimadzu, Ltd.) and a gas chromatograph (Model
`663, Hitachi, Ltd.).
`In isotachophoresis, the leading
`electrolyte was 10 mM HCl·fl-alanine at a pH of 3.1.
`The terminating electrolyte was 10 mM n-caproic acid.
`The electric current was 100 pA at 20°C. The gas
`chromatograph was used with a 2-m glass column
`packed with PEG 6000 10% Flusin P 30/60 (Gasukuro
`Kogyo, Inc.). Temperatures at the injection port,
`the column, and the FID detector were 150°C, 130°C,
`and 140°C respectively. The pH of culture super(cid:173)
`natant was adjusted to below 3 with 6 N HCJ before
`injection.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Inhibition of cell growth
`Highly-
`concentrated cell cultivation of E. coli
`harboring plasmid pTREZl by fed-batch
`culture was
`investigated. The DO con(cid:173)
`centration was used as a control indicator
`for medium feed, since the DO concentration
`increased when glucose in the broth was
`consumed.
`The results of cultivating the recombinant
`E. coli in the 5-l jar fermentor are shown in
`Fig. 1. When the cell concentration reached
`around 13 g/l, cell growth stopped despite
`medium feed. The cell concentration was
`gradually decreased by dilution with the
`broth by medium feed. Furthermore, /1-gal
`production could not be induced, though an
`inducer, 3-/1-indolylacrylic acid (IA) was
`added together with casamino acids after
`32 h of cultivation. Mori and colleagues 1>
`have reported a high cell concentration of
`125 gfl in a fed-batch culture of E. coli B.
`However, since Sinclair and Stokes 4 > and
`Landwall and Holme 2 > have described the
`
`c:'
`u
`c
`0 "8
`u
`
`0
`0
`
`.~- ~114~
`
`~- ~ 12-6:::::
`a ~ E
`o.'-
`.
`4 0 ~
`<.:>
`,---co~~-~-~-;,, 0
`I
`46 <n
`15
`20
`25
`30
`Time (h)
`
`Fig. I. Highly-concentrated cell cultivation of re(cid:173)
`combinant E. coli by fed-batch culture.
`tryptophan concentration was 10 mgfl.
`Initial
`the addition of 15 mgfl 3-fl(cid:173)
`Arrow indicates
`(lA) and 2.5 gfl casamino
`indolylacrylic acid
`acids.
`
`in
`accumulation of inhibitory substances
`E. coli B cultivation, these results seem to
`indicate that inhibitory substances accumu(cid:173)
`lating in the broth stopped cell growth.
`the
`The inhibition of cell growth by
`supernatant was investigated. Feeding medi(cid:173)
`um and fresh cells were added to a shake
`flask with the supernatant after 12 h of
`cultivation, when cell growth still continued.
`They were also added to a shake flask with
`the supernatant after 19 h of cultivation,
`when cell growth had stopped. The cells
`did not grow at all in the flask. Figure 2
`
`3
`
`......,
`.......
`0>
`
`c u
`
`c
`0
`u
`a;
`u
`
`Time
`Inhibition of cell growth by supernatant.
`Fig. 2.
`One and a quarter ml offeeding medium and 5 ml
`of fresh cells were added to shake flasks containing
`43.75 ml of the supernatant. A control flask
`contained M9 salt medium instead of the super(cid:173)
`natant. 0, control; ~c,., supernatant at 12 h of
`cultivation; 0, supernatant at 19 h of cultivation.
`
`BEQ 1028
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Vol. 66, 1988]
`
`Fed-Batch Cultures of Recombinant Escherichia coli
`
`189
`
`shows these results. For the supernatant at
`12 h of cultivation,
`the specific growth
`rate of cells was about half that measured for
`a control without adding supernatant. For
`comparison, the frozen and stored cells were
`inoculated into fresh medium to examine
`growth. The specific growth rates of the
`cells at 12 h of cultivation, the cells at 19 h of
`cultivation, and fresh cells were 0.36, 0.32,
`and 0.45 1/h, respectively. The growth of
`the cells was not lowered as much. Further(cid:173)
`more, adding lA induced fJ-gal production.
`These results show that inhibitory substances
`accumulated in
`the broth as cultivation
`proceeded.
`identification of in(cid:173)
`Isolation and
`hibitory substances
`The supernatant
`at 19 h of cultivation, when cell growth had
`stopped, was used to isolate and identify
`inhibitory substances in the broth. Liquid
`fractions were obtained by fractionating the
`supernatant by molecular weight. The frac(cid:173)
`tion of molecular weight of 1000 or less
`inhibited cell growth. Next, anionic sub(cid:173)
`stances obtained from
`the fraction using
`ion-exchange regins inhibited cell growth.
`This
`indicates
`that substances
`inhibiting
`cell growth are low-molecular anionic sub(cid:173)
`stances such as organic acids, which E. coli
`cells are known to produce. 5>
`low-molecular
`The solution containing
`anionic substances (solution L) was analyzed
`
`A
`
`300
`
`> §
`
`~ 200
`
`~
`~ .e
`
`0
`(L
`
`100
`
`0 3o
`
`34 35 38
`32
`Time (min)
`
`40
`
`44
`42
`Time (min)
`
`46
`
`48 49
`
`for organic acids with an isotachophoretic
`analyzer. The isotachopherograms of the
`solution L and of authentic organic acids are
`shown in Fig. 3.
`It was found that com(cid:173)
`ponent A had accumulated in the solution L
`by comparison with the isotachopherogram
`of the feeding medium components (data not
`shown). The isotachopherogram of
`the
`authentic organic acids indicates that com(cid:173)
`ponent A
`is acetic acid. The isotacho(cid:173)
`pherogram of the solution L to which authen(cid:173)
`tic acetic acid was added supported this
`indication (data not shown). Acetic acid
`concentration in the supernatant at 19 h of
`cultivation was measured at a high value of
`0.55 M. Gaschromatograph analysis of the
`supernatant in the broth further confirmed
`acetic acid accumulation.
`Various amounts of ammonium acetate
`were added to a medium to investigate the
`influence of acetate on cell growth and fJ-gal
`production. Results are shown in Fig. 4.
`Both
`the specific growth rate and fJ-gal
`production decreased when the acetate con(cid:173)
`centration was 0.17 M and more.
`It can be
`concluded that acetate accumulated in the
`broth was the primary inhibitor of cell growth
`and fJ-gal production.
`Acetate production by recombinant E. coli
`is shown in Fig. 5.
`In the fed-batch culture
`with DO concentration monitoring, cell
`growth stopped at 14 h of cultivation, when
`acetate concentration reached 0.23 M. The
`cell concentration was 11.6 gfl. The growth
`yield was 0.26 g-cells producedfg-glucose
`
`~ 0.4
`16 :::
`c
`E
`'
`~
`~2
`~
`"0
`"'
`.c
`3 0.2
`8 ~
`e c.
`~
`4 0
`~ 0.1
`·u
`<.9
`I
`"'
`~ 0o!-----:'O'"-.I-~0.2_.::...:0::.:.3-.~0~.4--0.~5-~0.6-..J0.7° "'-
`Acetate concn. (M)
`
`Isotachopherograms of low-molecular anionic
`Fig. 3.
`solution and authentic organic acids.
`The low-molecular anionic solution was diluted
`ten times with distilled water. A mixture of
`0.02 M authentic organic acids solution was used.
`
`Inhibition of cell growth and fl-gal production
`Fig. 4.
`by acetate.
`Fifteen mgf/ lA and 2.5 gfl casamino acids were
`added after 15 h of cultivation.
`fl-Gal production
`was assayed after 24 h of cultivation.
`
`BEQ 1028
`Page 3
`
`

`
`190
`
`SHIMIZU et a/.
`
`[J. Ferment. Technol.,
`
`10
`
`c
`u
`c
`o~ u-.._,
`Cl>'-5
`If) 0>
`o -
`u
`:::J
`<:5
`
`0
`
`6 0.6
`c u
`c
`0 u
`Cl> 0.2
`+-
`0
`+-
`Cl> u
`<[
`
`0.4
`
`0
`
`12
`
`8
`
`4
`
`"
`" E'
`c
`u
`c
`0
`u
`
`Cl>
`u
`
`Time (h)
`
`Fig. 5. Acetate production by recombinant E. coli.
`
`consumed. Acetate production causes this
`very low growth yield. The cells continued
`to produce acetate after 14 h of cultivation.
`Smirnova6 > has reported that cell growth
`stopped at an average acetate concentration
`of 0.15 M in fed-batch cultures of E. coli
`Kl2. Furthermore, Yano and colleagues 7>
`have described that the cell growth of E. coli
`B was completely inhibited at 0.18 M of
`acetate. The variant
`inhibition of cell
`growth by acetate concentration seems to be
`due to differences in E. coli strains.
`These results show that acetate produced
`by E. coli was the main inhibitory substance.
`Recombinant E. coli cultivation with
`acetate concentration monitoring Re(cid:173)
`combinant E. coli produced acetate in the
`broth. This acetate inhibited cell growth.
`Therefore, acetate production by cells must
`be prevented to attain highly-concentrated
`cell cultivation. Since a high glucose con(cid:173)
`centration in the broth was considered to
`accelerate acetate production by expression
`of the Crabtree effect, 8> the feeding medium
`was fed continuously to the fermentor to
`maintain glucose concentration in the broth
`
`12
`
`E
`c
`0
`Lf)
`Lf)
`+-
`0
`0
`0
`
`~
`.§ 150
`c u
`
`100
`
`c
`0
`u
`Cl>
`+-
`0
`"t 50
`u
`<[
`
`2
`
`6
`4
`Time (h)
`
`8
`
`10
`
`Fig. 6. Acetate assimilation by cells.
`Ammonium acetate concentration: O, no addition
`(control); e, 17 mM; 0, 83 mM; •· 167 mM.
`
`under 1 gfl. However, cells produced a
`great deal of acetate in a manner similar to
`that indicated by Fig. 5.
`The assimilation of acetate by cells was
`investigated to decrease acetate concentration
`in the broth, as shown in Fig. 6. Ammonium
`acetate was added to M9 medium in amounts
`of 17, 83, and 167 mM. Glucose concen(cid:173)
`tration in the M9 medium was 1 gfl. Acetate
`concentration in the broth increased for
`glucose catabolism at
`the beginning of
`cultivation. After 2 h of cultivation, acetate
`concentration gradually decreased
`in all
`cases and cell concentration increased. This
`shows
`that cells assimilated acetate and
`converted it into cell mass.
`In fed-batch culture, the feed rate was
`controlled and acetate concentration was
`monitored. Medium feed was stopped or
`the feed rate was decreased when acetate
`accumulated in the broth. This allows cells
`to assimilate acetate. Medium feed was
`resumed or the feed rate was increased when
`the acetate concentration
`in
`the broth
`decreased. The results of fed-batch culture
`with acetate concentration monitoring are
`shown in Fig. 7. Acetate concentration in
`the broth was predetermined under 33 mM
`
`BEQ 1028
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Vol. 66, 1988]
`
`Fed-Batch Cultures of Recombinant Escherichia coli
`
`191
`
`.!: ~ 1.5
`
`is J rl ' /].r1oCl D nOD~~. ::::
`i;::l~,oo~
`
`50 ~
`:::::: ~ 10
`~
`~
`0 &
`~ 0
`~~40~ 6.
`c 20
`0
`~ u
`~ 8 °o
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`Time (h)
`Fig. 7. Fed-batch culture with acetate concentration
`monitoring.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`and measured with the gas chromatograph
`every 30 min. Medium feed was stopped
`when acetate accumulated in the broth.
`As a result, the acetate concentration level
`was kept
`low and cells grew smoothly
`without acetate-induced inhibition. At 26 h
`of cultivation, the cell concentration reached
`a high value of 28.1 gfl. Growth yield
`reached a high value of 0.53 gfg. Since the
`feeding medium used contained 0.4 gfl
`tryptophan, ,8-gal production was repressed.
`However, ,8-gal was produced by derepression
`of the trp promoter at the end of cultivation,
`since tryptophan in the broth was consumed
`as nutrient upon stoppage of the medium
`feed. These results indicate that high cell
`density could be obtained by using feed rate
`control with acetate concentration monitor(cid:173)
`ing.
`,8-Gal was produced using fed-batch culture
`,8-
`with acetate concentration monitoring.
`Gal production was induced by exchanging
`a feeding medium containing tryptophan
`for one containing no tryptophan, rather
`than by adding lA and casamino acids
`during cultivation.
`Iijima and colleagues 9>
`have reported that tryptophan in the broth
`was removed by the cross-flow filtration and
`,8-gal gene was expressed.
`In this work,
`tryptophan was consumed by cells.
`,8-Gal
`production results of feeding-medium ex(cid:173)
`change are shown in Fig. 8.
`,8-Gal pro(cid:173)
`duction started as soon as the feeding medium
`was exchanged at 12 h of cultivation. At
`the end of cultivation, 64 U /ml of ,8-gal were
`
`15
`
`10
`~""
`
`5
`
`-o
`c
`so B
`'-' c:-o , u,
`::J
`-o
`::' E
`40 0. ~
`a>-u
`0
`l!l
`0 ~
`~ 0
`"',540~
`t; c 20
`+- u
`~ §
`0o
`~ u
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20 22
`
`Time (h)
`
`Fig. 8, P-Gal production by feeding-medium ex(cid:173)
`change.
`Arrow indicates when a feeding medium con(cid:173)
`taining tryptophan was exchanged for one con(cid:173)
`taining no tryptophan.
`
`produced, and the cell concentration was
`18.8 gfl. The glucose concentration in the
`broth ranged from 0.09 to 0.98 gfl. The
`growth yield was 0.49 gfg.
`,8-Gal per cell
`mass was 3.4 U/mg. This is a very large
`amount of ,8-gal compared with that previ(cid:173)
`ously reported.s>
`These results show that fed-batch culture
`with acetate concentration monitoring yielded
`high cell density and high ,8-gal production.
`
`References
`
`I) Mori, H., Yano, T., Kobayashi, T., Shimizu, S.:
`J. Chern. Eng. Jpn., 12, 313 (1979).
`2) Land wall, P., Holme, T.: J. Gen. Microbial.,
`103, 345 (1977).
`3) Shimizu, N., Fukuzono, S., Nishimura, N.,
`Odawara, Y., Fujiwara, K.: J. Ferment. Techno!.,
`65, 7 (1987).
`4) Sinclair, N. A., Stokes, J. L.: J. Bacteriol., 83,
`1147 (1962).
`5) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 1,
`420, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore/London
`(1984).
`6) Smirnova, G. V., Oktyabr'skii, 0. N.: Mikro(cid:173)
`biologiya, 54, 252 ( 1985).
`7) Yano, T., Mori, H., Kobayashi, T., Shimizu, S.:
`J. Ferment, Techno!., 58, 259 (1980).
`8) Crabtree, H. G.: Biochem. J., 23, 536 (1929).
`9) Iijima, S., Kawai, S., Mizutani, S., Taniguchi,
`M., Kobayashi, T.: Appl. Microbial. Biotechnol.,
`26, 542 (1987).
`
`(Received September 28, 1987)
`
`BEQ 1028
`Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket