throbber
J BL,1079-1082,870 Wira 20/10/97 8:17 am Page 1079
`
`Biotechnology Letters, Vol 19, No 11, November 1997, pp. 1079–1082
`
`Novel fed-batch strategy
`for the production of insulin-like
`growth factor 1 (IGF-1)
`N.D. Wangsa-Wirawan, Y.S. Lee, R.J. Falconer, C.J. Mansell, B.K. O’Neill
`and A.P.J. Middelberg*
`Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia;
`*Email: antonm@chemeng.adelaide.edu.au, Fax + 61-8-8303-4373
`
`The production of Long-R3-IGF-1 (an IGF-1 fusion analog) by constant-rate, fed-batch fermentation of Escherichia
`coli yielded 2.6 g fusion protein/L, corresponding to an actual IGF-1 concentration of 2.2 g/L. A novel strategy
`employing three distinct feeding stages was developed which raised product concentration to 4.3 g/L (3.6 g/L of
`IGF-1) while minimising glucose and acetate accumulation. This improved productivity was not accompanied by an
`increase in inclusion body size.
`
`Introduction
`Fed-batch fermentation has been commonly used to
`achieve high-cell-density cultivation. There are several
`feeding strategies that can be applied to achieve
`different goals (Yamane and Shimizu, 1984; Lee, 1996).
`Exponential feeding has been successfully applied for
`the high-cell-density culture of several non-recombinant
`and recombinant E. coli strains (Strandberg and Enfors,
`1991; Yee and Blanch, 1993; Helmulth et al., 1994)
`and leads to less acetate formation.
`
`An analog of insulin-like growth factor 1, termed
`Long-R3-IGF-1 (Francis et al., 1992), is produced as a
`solid inclusion body (IB) when expressed at high levels
`in recombinant E. coli. This protein is produced by
`GroPep Pty Ltd, Adelaide, and sold for use as a
`mammalian cell-culture
`supplement. Demand
`for
`culture media and consequently this protein is expected
`to increase as new biopharmaceutical products approach
`phase III clinical trials. Additionally, the fusion protein
`can be easily cleaved to give pure IGF-1, which has
`several clinical uses. There is consequently a need to
`improve the productivity of the current growth factor
`production process, preferably through process intensi-
`fication. A key unit to be optimised for higher yield is
`the fermenter. The existing strategy uses a constant-rate
`fed-batch system and achieves approximately 20 g cell
`dry weight (CDW)/L. The resulting inclusion body is
`small, with a typical median diameter of 0.3 mm,
`making separation of the inclusion bodies from the
`cellular debris difficult
`following high-pressure
`homogenisation.
`
`This paper details our initial attempts to increase the
`fermenter productivity and inclusion body size through
`improved control and feeding strategies. A series of
`fermentations was conducted where the feeding strategy
`was altered. A novel 3-stage feeding strategy was devel-
`oped. Oxygen transfer was also enhanced through the
`use of oxygen-enriched air feed.
`
`Materials and methods
`Strains and Growth
`E. coli strain JM101 [SupE thiD (lac- proAB) F¢[traD36
`proAB+ lacIq lacMZ M15]] containing the strictly-regu-
`lated plasmid p[Met1]-pGH(1–11)-Val-Asn-[Arg3]-
`IGF-1 (Francis et al., 1992) was grown on a modified
`C1 media agar plate (containing 100 mg Amp/L) and
`incubated at 37(cid:176)C for 24 h.
`
`Shake Flask Culture
`An inoculum for the fermenter was prepared in a shake
`flask containing 20 mL of sterile modified C1 media.
`This shake flask was inoculated with a single colony
`from the plate, then incubated at 37(cid:176)C in a shaker at
`200 rpm for 11 hours.
`
`Fed-batch Fermentation
`Fermentation was conducted in a 20-L fermenter with
`an initial volume of 12 L of modified C1 media (see
`below). A volume of inoculum was added to the
`fermenter and left overnight to give 2.4 g CDW/L at
`9 am on the following day. The pH of the culture was
`maintained at 6.9 using 25% ammonia solution.
`Temperature was 37(cid:176)C and dissolved O2 concentration
`
`© 1997 Chapman & Hall
`
`Biotechnology Letters · Vol 19 · No 11 · 1997
`
`1079
`
`11111
`
`234567891
`
`1234567892
`
`1234567893
`
`1234567894
`
`1234567895
`
`123
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`111
`
`BEQ 1019
`Page 1
`
`

`
`Figure 1 Fed-batch fermentation profiles using constant-
`rate feeding. u, dry cell weight (DCW); r, acetate concen-
`tration; m, glucose concentration. (a) feed rate = 9.7 mL/min;
`(b) feed rate = 11.4 mL/min.
`
`accumulation following induction is also typically
`observed (Figure 1). An inclusion body size of 0.32 mm
`and a fusion-protein concentration of 2.6 g/L, corre-
`sponding to an actual IGF-1 concentration of 2.2 g/L,
`were obtained for the fermentation reported in Figure 1a.
`
`The high acetate and glucose concentrations in Figure
`1 are due to a rapid decrease in specific growth rate
`following induction (Lee and Ramirez, 1992). A feeding
`strategy employing three different stages was therefore
`designed to overcome this problem. In stage 1, a high
`specific growth rate (0.25 h–1) was used to generate a
`high cell density before induction, and hence a large
`cell population for the production of recombinant
`protein. In stage 2, a rapidly-decreasing feedrate that is
`designed to approximate the rapid drop in metabolic
`activity following IPTG induction was employed.
`Finally, the lower and variable metabolic activity
`following induction was approximated with a glucose
`
`J BL,1079-1082,870 Wira 20/10/97 8:17 am Page 1080
`
`N.D. Wangsa-Wirawan et al.
`
`(DOC) was greater than 60% saturation. Aeration was
`switched to oxygen-enriched air (mixture of 25% air
`and 75% oxygen) when the DOC dropped below 60%,
`at an approximate cell concentration of 3 g CDW/L.
`Nutrient feeding commenced when glucose exhaustion
`occurred, at an approximate cell concentration of 13.5 g
`CDW/L. After 4 h of feeding, the culture was induced
`isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopyranoside
`with
`0.2 mM
`(IPTG) and the fermentation was terminated 5 h later.
`Two different
`feeding strategies were employed;
`constant-rate feeding and a novel 3-stage feeding
`strategy. For constant feeding, nutrient feed was
`pumped at a rate of 9.7 mL/min or 11.4 mL/min. 3-
`stage feeding was PLC-controlled. The initial stage
`consisted of exponential feeding for 4 h to give a
`constant specific growth rate of m= 0.25 h–1 prior to
`induction. Immediately following induction, a linearly-
`decreasing feed rate was used for 0.5 h, followed by
`exponential feeding for 4.5 h at a specific growth rate
`of m= 0.1 h–1. OD600, dry cell weight (DCW), glucose
`concentration, and acetate concentration were measured
`throughout the fermentation. Glucose concentration was
`measured using a YSI analyser (2700 SELECT, Yellow
`Springs Instruments, USA). Acetate concentration was
`determined using an enzyme assay kit obtained from
`Boehringer Mannheim (Catalog Number: 148261).
`Inclusion body size was measured using a Joyce Loebl
`Disc Centrifuge (Middelberg et al., 1990). Recombinant
`protein concentration was determined by High Perfor-
`mance Liquid Chromatography (Falconer et al., 1997).
`
`Modified C1 media
`D-Glucose.H2O, 2.96 g/L
`and
`shake flask)
`(for
`40.0 g/L (for fermenter); NH4Cl, 2.58 g/L; KH2PO4,
`2.54 g/L; Na2HPO4, 4.16 g/L; K2SO4, 1.94 g/L;
`MgSO4.7H2O,
`0.67 g/L;
`20 mg/L;
`FeSO4.7H2O,
`MnSO4.H2O, 5.0 mg/L; ZnSO4.7H2O, 8.6 mg/L;
`CuSO4.5H2O, 0.76 mg/L; trisodium citrate, 88 mg/L;
`thiamine, 48 mg/L.
`
`Nutrient feed
`D-Glucose.H2O, 620 g/L; KH2PO4, 5.3 g/L; Na2HPO4,
`79.0 g/L; K2SO4, 45.0 g/L; MgSO4.7H2O, 8.24 g/L. In
`yeast extract-supplemented nutrient feed, nutrient feed
`as above was supplemented with 65 g/L yeast extract.
`
`Results and discussion
`Fermentation profiles for the constant-rate feeding strat-
`egy are presented in Figure 1. Glucose accumulated to
`high concentrations (up to 40 g/L), and relatively low
`cell-densities were obtained. The highest OD600 previ-
`ously achieved using this standard production method
`was approximately 80 (unpublished data). High acetate
`
`1080
`
`Biotechnology Letters · Vol 19 · No 11 · 1997
`
`11111
`
`234567891
`
`1234567892
`
`1234567893
`
`1234567894
`
`1234567895
`
`123
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`111
`
`BEQ 1019
`Page 2
`
`

`
`J BL,1079-1082,870 Wira 20/10/97 8:17 am Page 1081
`
`Novel fed-batch strategy for the production of insulin-like growth factor 1
`
`feed rate designed to support a constant specific growth
`rate of 0.1 h–1. The feed profile is summarised in
`Figure 2. Stages 2 and 3 are an approximation to the
`changes in growth rate observed due to induction shock,
`as described by the shock-recovery model of Lee and
`Ramirez (1992).
`
`The fermentation profiles for 3-stage feeding are pre-
`sented in Figure 3a. An OD600 of 150, corresponding
`to a dry cell weight of 42 g/L, was achieved. This was
`nearly double that obtained using constant-rate feeding.
`Glucose accumulated
`in
`fermentation broth was
`decreased to 6.2 g/L, approximately 15% of the glucose
`level using constant-rate feeding. This method therefore
`overcomes glucose accumulation problems. After induc-
`tion, acetate gradually accumulated and reached a level
`of 44 mM at the end of fermentation. This acetate
`concentration is still excessive, but can be reduced by
`further optimisation of the feed profile. For example,
`the drop in metabolic activity post induction could be
`better approximated using three stages: a linearly
`decreasing stage; a stage with m = 0.1 h–1; and a stage
`with some constant m < 0.1 h–1.
`
`A recombinant protein concentration of 4.3 g/L corre-
`sponding to an actual IGF-1 concentration of 3.6 g/L was
`achieved, with an inclusion body size of 0.33 mm. The
`recombinant protein concentration was much higher
`than that obtained using constant-rate feeding. There
`was, however, no improvement in inclusion body size.
`This suggests the increase in total product is solely due
`to the increased biomass concentration. There are several
`possible reasons why we did not see an increase in the
`specific ratio of product to biomass. Further optimisation
`of the feed profile to restrict acetate below the inhibitory
`concentration may be necessary. Optimisation of other
`key parameters (e.g., IPTG concentration) may also be
`necessary, although previous tests suggest relative insen-
`sitivity (data not shown). We have previously observed
`translational
`limitation
`for this strong promoter
`(Jorgensen et al., 1997), so this is a likely limit to fur-
`ther productivity increases. To test this, a 3-stage fed-
`batch fermentation with yeast-extract-supplemented
`nutrient feed after induction was conducted.
`
`The fermentation profiles for exponential feeding with
`yeast-extract-supplemented nutrient are presented in
`Figure 3b. An OD600 of 163, corresponding to a dry
`cell weight of 56 g/L, was achieved. This was higher
`than that obtained using exponential feeding without
`yeast extract supplementation. Glucose accumulation
`was reduced to a level of 7.3 g/L. After induction,
`acetate gradually accumulated and reached a level of
`
`Biotechnology Letters · Vol 19 · No 11 · 1997
`
`1081
`
`Figure 2
`
`The novel 3-stage feeding strategy.
`
`Figure 3 Fed-batch fermentation profiles using exponen-
`tial feeding. u, dry cell weight (DCW); r, acetate concen-
`tration; m, glucose concentration. (a) without yeast-extract
`supplementation; (b) with yeast-extract supplementation.
`
`11111
`
`234567891
`
`1234567892
`
`1234567893
`
`1234567894
`
`1234567895
`
`123
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`111
`
`BEQ 1019
`Page 3
`
`

`
`J BL,1079-1082,870 Wira 20/10/97 8:17 am Page 1082
`
`N.D. Wangsa-Wirawan et al.
`
`4.4 mM at the end of fermentation. This is much lower
`than for the previous fermentations. A recombinant
`protein concentration of 3.7 g/L, corresponding to an
`IGF-1 concentration of 3.0 g/L, and an inclusion body
`size of 0.32 mm were achieved. Yeast extract supple-
`mentation did not improve inclusion body size. A lower
`recombinant protein level was also obtained. The pres-
`ence of yeast extract may enhance the growth of cells
`and thus reduce the rate of protein expression, or may
`simply alter the amino acid balance. This will influence
`the metabolic flux through amino acid pathways and
`may reduce overall protein expression.
`
`The novel 3-stage feeding procedure reported in this
`paper improved the productivity of IGF-1 fusion protein
`using recombinant E coli JM101. Glucose and, conse-
`quently, acetate accumulation were greatly decreased.
`Recombinant fusion protein concentration was increased
`from 2.6 g/L to 4.3 g/L, corresponding to an actual
`IGF-1 concentration of 3.5 g/L. However, inclusion body
`size was not altered by the novel feeding strategy nor by
`the supplementation of yeast extract. Further investiga-
`tion of factors altering inclusion body size and protein
`expression level, and further optimisation of the feeding
`strategy, has the potential to further increase the already-
`high IGF-1 concentration achieved in this study.
`
`Acknowledgment
`N.D. Wangsa-Wirawan thanks the CRC for Tissue
`Growth and Repair for partial support of this work
`through provision of a supplementary scholarship, and
`the University of Adelaide for support in the form of
`an OPRS award and a University of Adelaide
`Scholarship.
`
`References
`Falconer, RJ, O’Neill, BK and Middelberg, APJ (1997).
`Biotechnol Bioeng, in press.
`Francis, GL, Ross, M, Ballard, FJ, Milner, SJ, Senn, C, McNeil,
`KA, Wallace, JC, King, R and Wells, JRE (1992). J Molec
`Endo 8: 29–41
`Helmuth, K, Korz, DJ, Sanders, EA and Deckwer, W-D (1994).
`J Biotechnol 32: 289–298
`Jorgensen, L, Thomas, CJ, O’Neill, BK and Middelberg, APJ
`(1997). J Micobiol Biotechnol 7: 21–24
`Lee, J and Ramirez, WF (1992). Biotechnol Bioeng 39: 635–646
`Lee, SY (1996). Trends Biotechnol 14: 98–105
`Middelberg, APJ, Bogle, IDL and Snoswell, MA (1990). Biotech
`Prog 6:255–261
`Strandberg, L and Enfors, S-O
`13:609–614
`Yamane, T and Shimizu, S (1984) Fed-batch techniques in micro-
`bial processes. In: Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Bio-
`technology, A Fiechter, ed vol 30 pp 147–194, New York:
`Spinger-Verlag
`Yee, L and Blanch, HW (1993). Biotechnol Bioeng 41: 781–790
`
`(1991). Biotechnol Lett
`
`Received 28 July 1997
`Revisions requested 27 August 1997
`Revisions received 9 September 1997
`Accepted 9 September 1997
`
`1082
`
`Biotechnology Letters · Vol 19 · No 11 · 1997
`
`11111
`
`234567891
`
`1234567892
`
`1234567893
`
`1234567894
`
`1234567895
`
`123
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`0111
`
`111
`
`BEQ 1019
`Page 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket