throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on May 30, 2016 by guest
`
`APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Apr. 1990, p. 1004-1011
`0099-2240/90/041004-08$02.00/0
`Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology
`
`Vol. 56, No. 4
`
`Comparison of Growth, Acetate Production, and Acetate Inhibition
`of Escherichia coli Strains in Batch and Fed-Batch Fermentations
`GREGORY W. LULit AND WILLIAM R. STROHL*
`Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, 484 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210
`
`Received 18 October 1989/Accepted 11 January 1990
`
`The growth characteristics and acetate production of several Escherichia coli strains were compared by using
`shake Oasks, batch fermentations, and glucose-feedback-controlled fed-batch fermentations to assess the
`potential of each strain to grow at high cell densities. Of the E. coli strains tested, including JMIOS, B, W3110,
`W3100, HBIOI, DHI, CSHSO, MC1060, JRG1046, and JRG1061, strains JMIOS and B were found to have the
`greatest relative biomass accumulation, strain MC1060 accumulated the highest concentrations of acetic acid,
`and strain B had the highest growth rates under the conditions tested. In glucose-feedback-controlled fed-batch
`fermentations, strains B and JMIOS produced only 2 g of acetate· liter- 1 while accumulating up to 30 g of
`biomass. liter- 1 • Under identical conditions, strains HBIOI and MC1060 accumulated less than 10 g of
`biomass -liter- 1 and strain MC1060 produced 8 g of acetate -liter- 1 • The addition of various concentrations
`of sodium acetate to the growth medium resulted in a logarithmic decrease, with respect to acetate
`concentration, in the growth rates of E. coli JMIOS, JM105(p0S4201), and JRG1061. These data indicated th~t
`the growth of the E. coli strains was likely to be inhibited by the acetate they produced when grown on media
`containing glucose. A model for the inhibition of growth of E. coli by acetate was derived from these
`experiments to explain the inhibition of acetate on E. coli strains at neutral pH.
`
`Media used for the high-density growth of Escherichia coli
`(20, 22), as well as for the production of recombinant DNA
`products by E. coli strains (4, 25), typically include substan(cid:173)
`tial concentrations of glucose, since this is an inexpensive
`and readily utilizable carbon and energy source. Growth of
`E. coli on excess glucose under aerobic conditions, how(cid:173)
`ever, causes the formation of acidic by-products, of which
`acetate is the most predominant (1, 4, 9, 17, 20, 23, 25). This
`glucose-mediated aerobic acidogenesis, known as aerobic
`fermentation (4, 11, 16) or the bacterial Crabtree effect (10,
`25), is most readily observed when E. coli is grown at high
`growth rates in the presence of high glucose concentrations
`(10, 11, 16). These conditions are prevalent in fed-batch
`cultures in which glucose is fed in a nonlimiting manner to
`aerobic fermentation cultures to obtain high cell densities
`(17, 20, 22). The production of acidic by-products, especially
`acetate, is a major factor in the limitation of high-cell-density
`growth (1, 4, 17, 20, 26). Moreover, the accumulation of
`acetate during recombinant E. coli fermentations has been
`correlated with a reduced production of recombinant protein
`(8, 19), demonstrating the importance of choosing host
`strains and growth conditions which minimize acetate accu(cid:173)
`mulation. Although several studies have been carried out to
`determine the effect of fermentation conditions on the accu(cid:173)
`mulation of acetate and other by-products (1, 4, 8, 10, 12, 17,
`19, 20, 23, 25-27), no previous studies have compared the
`sensitivity of various E. coli strains to the bacterial Crabtree
`effect. In this study we compare several commonly used
`strains of E. coli with respect to growth rate, biomass yield,
`and acetate formation, with the goal of determining the
`strains most (or least) likely to yield good productivity in
`initial scale-up conditions. Such data should be helpful in
`choosing strains for rDNA fermentations.
`
`* Corresponding author.
`t Present address: Microlife Technics, Sarasota, FL 34230.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Strains and medium composition. E. coli strains and plas(cid:173)
`mids used in this study are listed in Table 1. For mainte(cid:173)
`nance, cultures were grown for 24 to 48 h on plates contain(cid:173)
`ing solidified (1.5% agar) SD-7 medium (see below) at 37oC
`and then stored at 4oc for about 2 weeks before subculture to
`fresh media. A glucose-yeast extract medium (SD-7 medium
`[Table 2]), based on mass balance with respect to cell
`composition (31) and biomass yields from major elements
`(23), was developed for the growth of the E. coli strains.
`SD-7 medium was titrated to pH 7.0 with 5 M NH40H before
`autoclaving, and the glucose and MgS04 were autoclaved
`separately from the remaining components and added after
`cooling. The trace-element solution contained the following
`(in grams per liter of 5 M HCI): FeS04 • 7H20, 40.0;
`MnS04 • H 20, 10.0; Al2(S04h, 28.3; CoCl · 6H20, 4.0;
`ZnS04 · 7H20, 2.0; Na2Mo04 • 2H20, 2.0; CuC12 · 2H20,
`1.0; and H3B04 , 0.5.
`For fermentation experiments, SD-7 medium was modi(cid:173)
`fied by reducing the ammonium and magnesium content to
`prevent precipitation (SD-8 base medium [Table 2]). SD-8
`medium was used for batch fermentations and as the initial
`medium for fed-batch fermentations. The remaining nutri(cid:173)
`ents added in the fed-batch fermentations were supplied in
`the various feed solutions by a computer-controlled scheme
`(described below).
`Shake Oask experiments. Growth characteristics and the
`effects of varying the acetate concentrations on these char(cid:173)
`acteristics were evaluated by using a final volume of 27 ml in
`300-ml flasks. The flasks were autoclaved empty and dried
`overnight at 85°C. Before the experiment, 25 ml of sterile
`SD-7 medium (containing 2 to 5 g of glucose · liter- 1 as
`designated) were pipetted into each of the shake flasks,
`which were equilibrated to 37oc by shaking in an orbital
`shaker (250 rpm) for 2 h. A seed flask containing 25 ml of
`SD-7 medium (with 2 g of glucose . liter- 1) was inoculated
`with 1.0 ml of an overnight culture which had been grown in
`5 ml of tryptic soy broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit,
`
`1004
`
`BEQ 1011
`Page 1
`
`

`
`VOL. 56, 1990
`
`E. COLI FERMENTATIONS
`
`1005
`
`TABLE 1. E. coli strains and plasmid used in this study
`
`Strain or
`plasmid
`
`Genotype
`
`Source"
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on May 30, 2016 by guest
`
`Once the flasks were equilibrated and the initial amounts
`of acetate were added, the turbidity was measured in a
`Klett-Summerson photometer to determine the background
`values (with a distilled water blank). Each flask was then
`inoculated, the contents were mixed, and 1.0 ml was re(cid:173)
`moved for later analysis of initial conditions. A turbidity
`measurement was taken to begin the experiment. Growth of
`the strains in these shake flask experiments was monitored
`every 30 min until early stationary phase. Another 1.0-ml
`sample was taken to determine final conditions, and the
`remainder of the culture was harvested for final dry-weight
`determinations. Samples were either stored on ice and
`assayed the same day or frozen at - 20°C and assayed the
`next day.
`Fermentations. Seed cultures for fermentations were
`started by picking an isolated colony from a plate and
`transferring by loop to a 1-liter flask containing 500 ml of
`SD-7 medium with 2 g of glucose · liter- 1 • Flasks were
`incubated overnight at 37°C at 200 rpm on an orbital shaker.
`The entire contents of the flask were used to inoculate the
`fermentor, which for batch culture conditions contained
`SD-8 base medium.
`The fermentation hardware has been extensively de(cid:173)
`scribed elsewhere (18, 28). Fermentors (MF-214; New Brun(cid:173)
`swick Scientific Co., Inc., Edison, N.J.) equipped with
`14-liter vessels (working volume, 10 liters) were used
`throughout this study. Control units (MRR-1; B. Braun
`Biotech, Bethlehem, Pa.) were used to monitor dissolved
`oxygen and pH in the fermentations with polarographic
`dissolved-oxygen probes (model 40180-02; Ingold Elec(cid:173)
`trodes, Inc., Andover, Mass.) and autoclavable pH probes
`(model 465; Ingold), respectively. All fermentations were
`carried out under the following growth conditions: temper(cid:173)
`ature, 37°C; pH, direct-digital controlled at 7 .0; dissolved
`oxygen, controlled by using the increase in agitation from
`300 to 600 rpm, followed by addition of mixtures of air and
`pure oxygen to 1 voUvoUmin (total flow) to maintain relative
`dissolved oxygen above 20% of saturation (18, 28).
`Glucose-feedback-controUed fed-batch fermentations. A
`computer-assisted on-line glucose analyzer was developed
`for the combined model-based and glucose feedback control
`offed-batch fermentations, as described previously (18). The
`system consisted of the prototype model 2000 glucose ana(cid:173)
`lyzer (Yellow Springs Instruments, Inc., Yellow Springs,
`Ohio), a filtration system (Megaftow TM-10; New Brun(cid:173)
`swick) containing a 10-in2 , 0.2-~J.m-pore-size filter, and high(cid:173)
`speed circulation pump (model7520-25; Cole-Parmer Instru(cid:173)
`ment Co., Chicago, Ill.). Modifications to the previously
`described system for this study included a higher sampling
`rate (2 min) and a 0.2-(.l.m-pore-size filter (Gelman Sciences,
`Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.) between the glass tee union and the
`two-way acrylic valve. The setpoint for glucose control in
`the fed-batch fermentations described herein was 1.0 ± 0.2
`g · liter- 1 • When the glucose concentration remained within
`this window, the pump rate remained the same.
`For fed-batch fermentations, three feed solutions were
`used. (i) Feed no. 1 contained the following (in grams per
`liter): glucose, 200; MgS04 • 7H20, 0.85; (ii) feed no. 2
`contained the following (in grams per liter): glucose, 780;
`MgS04 • 7H20, 8.58; and (iii) feed no. 3 contained the
`following (in grams per liter): NH4Cl, 280; yeast extract, 150;
`it also contained 32 ml of the trace-element solution. All
`components of the feed solutions dissolved during autoclav(cid:173)
`ing and remained in solution upon cooling. A feeding strat(cid:173)
`egy was devised which began with SD-8 base medium in the
`vessel, with the exception that the initial glucose concentra-
`
`Strains
`B
`CSH50
`DH1
`
`HB101
`
`Wild type
`F- il.(lac proAB) strA thi ara
`F- recAJ endAJ gyrA96 thi-1
`hsdR17 supE44 A-
`F- hsd-20 recA13 ara-14 proAl lac-
`41 galK2 Str xyl-5 mtl-1 supE44
`A-
`F- il.(lac proAB) lacJ'I thi repsL
`endAJ slcB15 hadR4 traD36
`proABil.(ZM15)
`JRG1046 F- pta-39 trpR80 iclR17 A-
`JRG1061 F- ack-11 trpA9761 trpR72 iclR7
`gal-25 A-
`MC1060 F- il.(lacl-lacY)74 galEJ5 galK16
`relAJ rpsL150 spoTJ hsdR2 A-
`F- gal Ahft
`F- [r- m-]
`
`JM105
`
`W3100
`W3110
`
`osu 333
`C. J. Daniels
`J. S. Lampe!
`
`J. S. Lampe!
`
`Pharmacia
`
`CGSC 5992
`CGSC 5993
`
`CGSC 6648
`osu 395
`osu 389
`
`Plasmid
`p0S4201 pKK223-3 with denC at Smal siteh
`
`D. H. Dean
`
`a Abbreviations: OSU, The Ohio State University culture collection;
`CGSC, E. coli Genetic Stock Center (B. J. Bachmann).
`b The denC gene encodes delta endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis.
`
`Mich.). The culture in the seed flask was grown to mid(cid:173)
`exponential phase (Klett values of 50 to 100), and then 1.0 ml
`of this seed culture was used to inoculate each experimental
`flask.
`Acetate stock solutions were prepared in concentrated
`form so that 0.1 to 1.0 ml of the stock solution could be
`added to the experimental shake flask to give the desired
`final concentration. The acetate stock solution contained
`380.0 g of sodium acetate . liter- 1 (270.2 g of acetate
`ion · liter- 1) so that 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 ml yielded final
`concentrations of 1, 2, 5, or 10 g of acetate anion. liter- 1 ,
`respectively, in 27-ml (final volume) cultures. The volumes
`were equalized to 27 ml by addition of sterile water. In
`experiments in which the acetate was added at mid-loga(cid:173)
`rithmic phase, both the acetate additions and the water
`blanks were added after the experimental cultures had been
`grown to mid-exponential phase.
`
`TABLE 2. Components of media used to grow E. coli in batch
`and fed-batch fermentations
`
`Amt component (g/liter) added to medium listed
`for purpose mentioned
`
`Component
`
`NH4Cl
`KH2P04
`Na2HP04
`K 2S04
`MgS04 • 7H20
`Trace elements•
`Yeast extract
`Glucose
`Batch
`Fed-batch
`
`SD-7
`medium
`
`7.0
`1.5
`1.5
`0.35
`0.17
`0.8
`5.0
`
`1.0-5.0
`
`SD-8 medium
`
`Base and
`initial
`medium
`
`Components
`added in feed
`solutions
`
`7.0
`7.5
`7.5
`0.85
`0.17
`0.8
`10.0
`
`20.0
`1.0
`
`28.0
`0.0
`0.0
`0.0
`0.86
`3.2
`15.0
`
`99.0
`
`a Milliliters of trace elements solution, prepared as described in Materials
`and Methods, added per liter of medium or feed solution.
`
`BEQ 1011
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on May 30, 2016 by guest
`
`1006
`
`LULl AND STROHL
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`tion was 1.0 g. liter-1 (Table 2), and feed no. 1 was added
`based on glucose feedback control set at 1.0 g · liter-1 until
`the culture reached about 9 g of dry cell weight
`(DCW). liter-1. At that point, feeds no. 2 and 3 were added
`in place offeed no. 1 to keep up with the requirements of the
`high-density fermentations. In all cases, the glucose solu(cid:173)
`tions were fed at a rate based on glucose requirements
`calculated from previously run fermentations. Glucose feed(cid:173)
`back control was based on the on-line glucose concentration
`measurements as previously described (18).
`Analytical procedures. Cell growth was monitored by
`measuring culture turbidity with a Klett-Summerson color(cid:173)
`imeter using a red filter and by dry weight of biomass,
`determined as described previously (28). Off-line glucose
`analysis was carried out by using an analyzer (model 27;
`Yellow Springs Instruments) calibrated with either 2.0 or 5.0
`g of glucose standards. liter-1. Samples were clarified by
`centrifugation in a microcentrifuge and diluted in distilled
`water if necessary.
`Fermentation broth samples were prepared for acetic acid
`analysis by precipitation of macromolecules at pH 2.0 by the
`addition of 50 fLl of 70 mM H2S04 per 1.0 ml of sample at
`room temperature. The precipitate was pelleted for 2 min in
`a microcentrifuge, and the supernatants were filtered
`through a 0.2-fLm-pore-size, 13-mm-diameter filter (Gelman).
`The acetic acid produced in fermentation and shake flask
`experiments was quantitated by high-pressure liquid chro(cid:173)
`matography. The system consisted of Beckman/ Altex model
`100A pumps, model 420 pump controller, and model 400
`solvent mixer; an injector with a 20-fLl loop (model 7125;
`Rheodyne Inc., Cotati, Calif.); and Teflon tubing (inner
`diameter, 0.18 mm; Alltech Associates Inc., Deerfield, Ill.)
`was used throughout the system. An organic acid analysis
`Aminex ion-exchange column (7 .8 by 300 mm; model HPX-
`87H; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) was used,
`and organic acids were separated by using 3.5 mM H2S04 at
`pH 2.0 at a flow rate of0.7 ml. min- 1 at room temperature.
`The elution was monitored with a Hitachi model 160-40
`variable-wavelength spectrophotometer set at 210 nm, and
`A210 peaks were recorded and integrated with either a model
`3390A or model3396 integrator (Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo
`Alto, Calif.). Organic acid standards were prepared from
`reagent-grade chemicals dissolved in high-pressure liquid
`chromatography-grade water. Standards were injected under
`the same conditions as the fermentation samples, and the
`retention times were compared. The identification of acetate
`in samples of fermentation broth was confirmed by cochro(cid:173)
`matography.
`
`RESULTS
`Shake flask experiments. The growth rate, yield, final
`biomass, and acetate production by eight E. coli strains were
`compared after growth of the strains under identical condi(cid:173)
`tions in shake flasks containing SD-7 medium plus 5 g of
`glucose . liter- 1 (Table 3). Under the conditions tested, the
`growth rates of the strains ranged from 0.85 h-1 (generation
`time, 49 min) to 1.42 h- 1 (generation time, 29 min), the final
`dry cell weights ranged from 1.16 to 1.87 g · liter-1, the
`yields (grams of biomass per gram of glucose utilized) ranged
`from 0.54 to 0.77, and 0.30 to 0.92 g of acetate · liter- 1 was
`produced (Table 3). The strains could be divided into two
`categories based on their growth rates in SD-7 medium:
`fast-growing strains (strains B, W3110, W3100, and CSH50)
`and slow-growing strains (strains JM105, DH1, MC1060, and
`HB101). The faster-growing strains generally produced more
`
`TABLE 3. Comparison of the growth parameters of several
`E. coli strains grown in shake flasks containing SD-7 medium•
`
`Strain
`
`B
`W3110
`W3100
`CSH50
`JM105
`DH1
`MC1060
`HB101
`
`Initial specific
`growth rate
`(h-1)
`
`DCW
`(g/liter)
`
`Yield (g of cells/
`g of glucose
`consumed)
`
`Amt of acetate
`produced
`(g/liter)
`
`1.42
`1.29
`1.13
`1.00
`0.93
`0.91
`0.90
`0.85
`
`1.76
`1.34
`1.61
`1.45
`1.69
`1.16
`1.42
`1.87
`
`0.63
`0.57
`0.54
`0.60
`0.71
`0.64
`0.60
`0.77
`
`0.79
`0.50
`0.79
`0.62
`0.35
`0.51
`0.92
`0.30
`
`• SD-7 medium in these experiments contained 5 g of glucose · liter 1
`(autoclaved separately and added after cooling). The data represent the
`average of three separate experiments, and in no case was the standard error
`above 5%.
`
`acetate and had lower biomass yields from glucose than did
`the slower-growing strains. The major exceptions to these
`generalized relationships were found with strain MC1060,
`which, although slow-growing, produced the largest amount
`of acetate of any strain tested, and strain B, which main(cid:173)
`tained both high growth yields and high growth rates (Table
`3).
`Effect of acetate additions to shake flask cultures. The
`addition of sodium acetate to shake flask cultures of the
`acetate kinase mutant, strain JRG1061, the low-acetate(cid:173)
`producing strain, JM105, and a recombinant strain, JM10?
`(p0S4201), in SD-7 medium (containing 2 g of glucose · h(cid:173)
`ter-1) reduced the growth rates of the organisms logarithmi(cid:173)
`cally (Fig. 1). The ack (acetate kinase minus) mutant strain,
`JRG1061, which should have a reduced ability to assimilate
`acetate (9), was inhibited by acetate to the same extent as
`was strain JM105. Therefore, the ability with which a strain
`
`2 .0 1 r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
`•
`
`.c
`i 0.2
`
`2 "
`
`0jL-~--*2--i3--~4--~5~~6~~7~~8~~9~~~
`Na-Acetate lg/LI
`
`57
`
`45.6
`34.2
`22.8
`11.4
`lmg/L; pH7.01
`ICH3COOHI
`FIG. 1. Effect of exogenously added acetate concentration in
`SD-7 medium (containing 2 g of glucose. liter- 1 [pH 7.0]) on the
`growth rates of E. coli strains. The acetate was added just before
`inoculation. Symbols: •· JM105; A, strain JM105(p0S4201); e,
`strain JRG1061; 0, data showing the same effect on strain JM105 of
`acetate added at mid-logarithmic growth phase. Each datum point
`represents triplicate values with less than 2% error. The line was
`drawn by calculated linear regression for data from strain JM105 (r
`= 0.9997). The concentration of the protonated form of acetate at
`pH 7.0 was calculated by using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equa(cid:173)
`tion.
`
`BEQ 1011
`Page 3
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on May 30, 2016 by guest
`
`VoL. 56, 1990
`
`E. COLI FERMENTATIONS
`
`1007
`
`TABLE 4. Comparison of the growth characteristics of several
`E. coli strains grown in batch cultures of SD-8 medium
`in 10-liter stirred-tank fermentors
`
`Strain
`
`Specific Glucose
`growth
`consump-
`rate
`tion rate
`(h-')
`(h-')"
`
`Yield
`(g of cells/
`g of glu-
`cose con-
`sumed)
`
`Final
`DCW
`(g/liter)
`
`Acetate
`production
`
`Initial
`rate
`(h-')"
`
`Final
`concn
`(g/liter)
`
`B
`JRG1046
`JRG1061
`JM105
`MC1060
`JB101
`
`1.14
`1.02
`0.89
`0.79
`0.77
`0.64
`
`1.09
`1.38
`0.56
`0.44
`0.89
`0.85
`
`1.02
`0.61
`0.33
`0.64
`0.56
`0.73
`
`9.3
`9.6
`8.3
`10.8
`8.0
`5.4
`
`0.50
`0.71
`0.39
`0.62
`0.78
`0.57
`
`1.75
`1.60
`3.03
`1.20
`5.12
`0.88
`
`a Calculated as slope= log [(grams of acetate per liter at time point T2 -
`grams of acetate per liter at time point T1)/(time point T2 -
`time point T1)],
`which yields h- 1•
`
`metabolized acetate did not apparently influence the inhibi(cid:173)
`tory effect of acetate on that strain. Similarly, the growth
`rate of the recombinant strain, JM105(p0S4201), was inhib(cid:173)
`ited to the same extent by the added acetate, indicating that
`the presence of the plasmid did not alter the level of toxicity
`of acetate to strain JM105 (Fig. 1). Moreover, the inhibition
`of growth of E. coli by acetate was independent of the age of
`the culture (Fig. 1). When sodium acetate was added at
`mid-exponential phase to make 10 g. liter-1 (final concen(cid:173)
`tration), both the growth rate and yield (grams of DCW per
`gram of glucose utilized) of strain JM105 were reduced by
`more than 50%, compared with control cultures in which
`only buffer was added at the same time (data not shown).
`Batch fermentations. Four strains were further compared
`in 10-liter batch fermentations with SD-8 medium: (i) a slow(cid:173)
`growing, high-acetate producer (strain MC1060); (ii) a slow(cid:173)
`growing, low-acetate producer (strain HB101); (iii) a fast(cid:173)
`growing, high-acetate producer (strain B); and (iv) a fast(cid:173)
`growing, relatively low-acetate producer (strain JM105). In
`addition to these four strains, two E. coli mutant strains
`defective in acetate metabolism, JRG1046 and JRG1061 (15),
`were included in these batch fermentation experiments.
`With the six strains of E. coli that were grown in SD-8 base
`medium in batch fermentations, wide ranges of growth rates
`(0.79 to 1.14 h-1), glucose consumption rates (0.44 to 1.09
`h-1), acetate production rates (0.39 to 0.78 h-1), biomass
`yield on glucose (0.33 to 1.02 g . g-1), and amount of acetate
`produced (0.88 to 5.12 g. liter-1) were observed. The
`growth rates of the six strains grown in SD-8 base medium in
`batch fermentation (Table 4) were 15 to 25% lower than the
`growth rates for the same strains grown in SD-7 medium in
`shake flasks (Table 3). There was generally an inverse
`relationship between the growth rates and the yields from
`glucose, which was similar to the shake flask data (Table 3)
`and data obtained in other investigations (10). One exception
`to these trends was that strain B maintained a high biomass
`yield from glucose during rapid growth. Unexpectedly,
`strains MC1060 and JRG1061 produced large amounts of
`acetate while growing relatively slowly.
`Fed-batch fermentations. The growth parameters and ace(cid:173)
`tate production of four strains were evaluated under glucose
`feedback-controlled conditions in which the glucose setpoint
`was 1.0 ± 0.2 g. liter-1. The actual glucose control was not
`quite as tight as that set by the computer and was usually
`within 1.0 ± 0.5 g. liter-1; this was due to the changes in
`growth rates by the strains used during the fermentations.
`Under these glucose-controlled conditions, strain JM105
`
`grew to 31 g · liter of DCW liter-1 (Fig. 2A) with a biomass
`yield of 0.42 g of DCW · g of glucose consumed-1 and a
`productivity of 3.47 g of DCW. liter-1 . h- 1. The initial
`growth rate was 0.69 h-1 for the first 5 h; however, the
`growth rate continually declined for the last 4 h of the
`experiment. Acetate was accumulated by JM105 to a final
`concentration of about 2 g . liter-1.
`In fed-batch cultures, strain B grew at a rate of 1.03 h- 1
`during the initial growth phase, and growth continued to
`about 30 g of DCW · liter-1 (Fig. 2B). Because of the rapid
`growth, the proportional control of the feed pumps could not
`maintain the feed rate to meet the glucose demand of the
`culture, and therefore the culture became glucose limited by
`3.5 h. Biomass productivity was 3.75 g of DCW . li(cid:173)
`ter-1 · h-1, and about 2 g of acetate · liter-1 was accumu(cid:173)
`lated. However, during the period of glucose limitation, the
`acetate produced at the beginning of the experiment was
`consumed. Once relieved from glucose limitation, after
`about 6 h of growth, acetate again began to accumulate.
`Only 9.1 g (DCW) of strain HB101 · liter-1 was produced
`under fed-batch culture conditions similar to those described
`for strains JM015 and B (Fig. 2C). Glucose concentration
`was well controlled near the setpoint, and, similarly to
`strains JM105 and B, only about 2.0 g of acetate · liter-1 was
`produced. The accumulation of acetate continued through(cid:173)
`out the experiment at a nearly constant rate of 0. 2 h - 1.
`Strain MC1060 grew to about 10 g of DCW . liter-1 in 9 h
`(Fig. 2D). Even though good control of glucose concentra(cid:173)
`tion was achieved, 8 g of acetate · liter-1 was accumulated.
`The rate of acetate accumulation by strain MC1060 in
`fed-batch cultures was similar to that of batch fermentations
`(Table 4), but because of the longer period of growth in
`fed-batch cultures, more acetate was accumulated.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Growth of E. coli strains in batch and fed-batch fermenta(cid:173)
`tions. Of the six strains of E. coli grown in batch fermenta(cid:173)
`tions, strain JM105 had the lowest glucose consumption rate
`and a relatively low growth rate, and it produced the second
`smallest amount of acetate of all strains tested, which may
`explain why cell densities of JM105 were higher than those
`of the other K-12 derivatives tested. Strain JM105 was
`unique in that a biphasic growth curve was measured during
`batch fermentations, while the glucose consumption rate
`remained constant (18). A similar biphasic growth curve was
`observed previously in the high-cell-density growth of other
`E. coli strains (1).
`Strain B grew at the highest rate and had the highest
`biomass productivity of all strains tested. Strain B has been
`used to produce the highest recorded cell densities of E. coli
`in fed-batch fermentations (125 g . liter-1 [20]; 90 g . liter-1
`[22]), whereas there is only one report of an E. coli K-12
`derivative grown as dense as 78 g · liter-1 in fed-batch
`fermentations (1). On the other hand, in a comparison of the
`high-density growth of a few E. coli strains, Bauer and Ziv
`(7) found that E. coli W, a strain unrelated to E. coli K-12 (5),
`achieved both higher biomasses and higher growth rates than
`E. coli B grown at 30°C under identical high-cell-density
`fed-batch growth conditions.
`Strains HB101 and MC1060 did not grow to densities
`greater than 10 g of DCW . liter-1 under fed-batch condi(cid:173)
`tions similar to those which supported 30 g of strains JM105
`and B . liter-1 (Fig. 2). Since the fed-batch cultures of
`HB101, JM105, and B produced approximately the same
`amount of acetate, other genetic factors probably were
`
`BEQ 1011
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on May 30, 2016 by guest
`
`1008
`
`LULl AND STROHL
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`10
`
`B
`
`•
`
`.. u ...
`
`0
`
`3~
`~
`
`-~ •
`
`2J
`
`•
`•
`
`10
`
`Time [hl
`
`1 ..
`
`i
`
`o.:i
`12
`
`c
`
`D
`
`10
`
`4
`cj
`.:1
`
`•
`
`2
`
`0
`
`•
`
`8
`
`FIG. 2. Growth of E. coli strains in SD-8 medium in glucose feedback-controlled fed-batch fermentations. In all cases, the soluble glucose
`setpoint was controlled at 1.0 g. liter- 1 (horizontal line). Symbols: e, DCW (grams per liter); •· soluble glucose concentration (grams per
`liter); •. soluble acetate concentration (grams per liter). (A) Strain JM105; (B) strain B; (C) strain HBIOI; (D) strain MC1060.
`
`involved in the limitation of the growth of HB101. On the
`other hand, the fed-batch culture of strain MC1060 accumu(cid:173)
`lated large amounts of acetate, even though glucose concen(cid:173)
`trations were maintained at low levels. In previous studies
`with other E. coli strains, the production of acetate was
`limited by controlling glucose at concentrations slightly
`higher than the levels maintained in this work (1). The
`acetate production rate exhibited by strain MC1060, how(cid:173)
`ever, was only slightly higher than that of other strains which
`did not accumulate as much acetate (Table 4). In batch
`culture fermentations of strain MC1060, the level of acetate
`
`did not decrease once the glucose was completely consumed
`(data not shown), indicating that the accumulation of acetate
`to higher concentrations in MC1060 cultures may be due to
`reduced enzyme activity in the acetate reassimilation path(cid:173)
`way. Once glucose has been consumed, most E. coli cultures
`reutilize acetate (1, 4, 9, 12) by an activated tricarboxylic
`acid cycle (2, 10).
`Acetate production by acetate metabolism mutants. The ack
`(acetate kinase-minus) strain, JRG1061 (15), accumulated
`substantial amounts of acetate, which was expected since
`ack mutants were previously shown to accumulate at least as
`
`BEQ 1011
`Page 5
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on May 30, 2016 by guest
`
`VoL. 56, 1990
`
`E. COLI FERMENTATIONS
`
`1009
`
`much acetate as wild-type strains did (9). The production of
`acetate by an ack strain was probably due to the spontane(cid:173)
`ous hydrolysis of acetyl phosphate, which occurs at rela(cid:173)
`tively high rates at 37°C under physiological conditions (9).
`Similarly, the absence of acetate kinase would possibly slow
`the reassimilation of acetate by strain JRG1061. Even though
`acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) synthetase is considered to
`be the primary route for acetate assimilation (21), the max(cid:173)
`imal velocity of acetyl-CoA formation by this enzyme is too
`low to support the growth of E. coli (9). Moreover, acetyl(cid:173)
`CoA synthetase is inhibited by glucose (9), suggesting that
`the acetate kinase-phosphotransacetylase route may be im(cid:173)
`portant in the reassimilation of acetate, albeit with low
`affinity (9).
`The production of 1.6 g of acetate · liter- 1 by the pta
`(phosphotransacetylase-minus) mutant strain, JRG1049, was
`unexpected since Brown et al. (9) differentiated pta and ack
`mutants based on the inability of the former to produce
`acetate. It is possible that reversal of the acetyl-CoA syn(cid:173)
`thetase reaction is responsible for this acetate production;
`however, since acetyl-CoA synthetase is repressed by glu(cid:173)
`cose (9), it should not have been active under the growth
`conditions used. Acetyl-CoA synthetase mutants have not
`yet been isolated (21), so the acetate production by a
`combined pta and acetyl-CoA synthetase mutant cannot be
`measured as yet.
`Inhibition of growth by acetate. It is well established that
`E. coli cultures growing aerobically in the presence of excess
`glucose produce acidic by-products, particularly acetate (1,
`3, 4, 8-11, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27). This glucose-mediated
`aerobic acidogenesis is known as the bacterial Crabtree
`effect (10, 25). The formation of acetate has been suggested
`to be caused by an imbalance between glucose metabolism
`and respiration (3, 13), a condition in which influx of carbon
`into the cell exceeds demands for biosynthesis (12), the
`presence of excess NADH (10), the repression of tricarbox(cid:173)
`ylic acid cycle enzymes (2, 14, 25), or uncoupled metabolism
`(26). It is likely that all of these interrelated causes are
`involved.
`The acetate produced by E. coli cultures growing on
`excess glucose has been suggested to cause an increased
`uncoupling in metabolism (26, 27). Because of its weak
`lipophilic nature, the protonated form of acetate is able to
`cross the cell membrane (6, 24) and act as an uncoupler of
`the proton motive force (specifically dpH) (24, 26, 27). This
`toxic effect has been clearly demonstrated at pH values at or
`below the pKa of the acid (24, 29); however, evidence now
`suggests that acetate is toxic to cell growth at neutral pH
`when sufficient amounts accumulate in the medium (1, 4, 17,
`20, 22, 26). Acetate exists at neutral pH in both the ionized
`(CH3Coo-) and protonated (CH3COOH) states. The more
`lipophilic protonated form can pass through the lipid mem(cid:173)
`brane to the interior of the cell, where it dissociates at the
`higher internal pH (ca. 7 .5) to CH3Coo- and H+, thereby
`decreasing the intracellular pH (24, 27). When the proto(cid:173)
`nated acid moves across the membrane into the cells,
`additional protonated acid is formed in the medium by the
`equilibrium, causing a net electroneutral hydrogen ion influx
`(24). The overall external pH would not change drastically,
`because of the large volume of buffered medium, so the
`decrease in intracellular pH would cause an uncoupling
`effect. The homeostatic mechanisms of E. coli require en(cid:173)
`ergy to adjust to this decrease in intracellular pH, even in the
`absence of an overall change in proton motive force (27).
`Thus for rapid

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket