throbber
INDUSTRIAL
`
`]OURNAL OF
`
`
`
`STOCKTON
`
`VOLUME 16 - NUMBER 3 - MARCH 1996
`
`BEga1g0e0Z
`
`BEQ 1007
`Page 1
`
`

`
`~
`STOCKTON
`
`Journal of Industrial /vlicrobiology
`is published by Stockton
`Press, a division of Macmillan Press Ltd, on behalf of the Society
`for Industrial Microbiology.
`
`lvlicrobiology
`Industrial
`Journal of
`an
`is
`Scope The
`international journal which publi shes original research letters,
`short communications , critical reviews and peer-reviewed letters
`to
`the Editor
`in
`the field of biotechnology , fermentation,
`environmental microbiology, biodegradation , biodeterioration ,
`quality control and other areas of applied microbiology .
`
`This journal is covered by Current Advances in Biochemi stry ,
`Current Advances in Ecological Sciences, Current Advances in
`Genetics
`and Molecular Biology, Current Biotechnology
`Abstracts and Excerpta Medica.
`
`Editorial Submitted manuscripts will be reviewed by at least
`two members of the Journal ' s Editorial Board. Manuscripts which
`are not concise or do not conform to the conventions and
`standards of the Journal will be returned to the authors for
`revision. Submission of an article to the Journal implies that it
`has not been publi shed previously and that it
`is not being
`considered for publication elsewhere.
`
`Manuscripts and all editorial correspondence should be sent to:
`Dr JJ Cooney
`Environmental Science Program
`University of Massachusetts
`I 00 Morrissey Bl vd
`Boston MA 02 125-3393, USA
`Tel: + I 617 287 7446
`Fax : + I 617 287 7474
`
`Advertisements Enquiries concern ing adverti sements should be
`addressed to:
`Michael Rowley
`Hasler House
`High Street
`Great Dunmow
`Essex
`CM6 lAP, UK
`Tel: +44 (0) 1371 874613
`Fax: +44 (0) 137 1 872273
`Publisher All business correspondence, supplement enquiries
`and reprint requests should be addressed to Joumal of Industrial
`Microbiology,
`Stockton Press, Houndmills, Basingstoke,
`Hampshire RG21 6XS , UK. Tel : +44 (0) 1256 29242. Fax: +44
`(0) 1256 810526.
`Publisher: Jayne Marks
`Production Controller: Sharon Clark
`
`Subscriptions - EU/Rest of World Subscription price per
`annum (two volumes, six issues) £491 , rest of the world £491
`(surface), £585 (airmail) or equivalent in any other currency.
`Orders must be accompanied by re mittance. Cheques should be
`to Macmillan Maga zines and sent
`made paya ble
`to: The
`Subscription Department, Macmillan Press Ltd, Houndmills,
`Basingstoke, Hampshire RG2 1 6XS , UK. Where appropriate,
`subscribers may make payments
`into UK Post Office Giro
`Account No. 519 2455 . Full details must accompany the payment.
`Subscribers from EU territories should add sales tax at the local
`rate.
`
`Subscriptions - USA USA subscribers call toll free 1-800-22 1
`2 123 or send check/money order/credit card details to: Stockton
`Press, 345 Park A venue South, lOth Floor, New York, NY I 00 I 0-
`1707. Tel: + I 212 689 9200. Fax: + 1 2 12 689 9711. USA annual
`subscription rates (institutional/corporate): $730 (surface), $930
`(airmail).
`
`Reprints of any article in thi s journal are available from Stockton
`Press, Houndmill s, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG 2 1 6XS , UK. Tel:
`+44 (0) 1256 29242. Fax: +44 (0) 1256 810526.
`
`Copyright © 1996 Society for Industrial Microbiology
`ISS N 0169-4 146
`
`All rights of reproduction are reserved in respect of all papers,
`articles, illustrations, etc., published in this journal in all countries
`of the world.
`
`All material publi shed in thi s journal is protected by copyri ght,
`which covers exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the
`material. No material published in thi s journal may be reproduced
`or stored on microfilm or in electronic, optical or magnetic fo rm
`without the written authorization of the Publisher.
`
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use of
`specific clients, is granted by Stockton Press, for libraries and
`other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC)
`Transaction Reporting Service, provided that the base fee of
`$ 12 .00 per copy is paid directl y to CCC, 2 1 Congress St, Salem,
`MA 01970, USA 0169-4146/96 $ 12.00 + $0.00.
`
`Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or pri vate
`study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyri ght,
`Designs and Patent Act 1988, this publication may be reproduced,
`stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, only with the
`prior permission in writing of the publi shers, or in the case of
`reprographic reproduction ,
`in accordance with
`the
`terms of
`licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
`
`\:Vhilst e very effon is made by the publishers and ed itorial board to see that no inaccurate or mi slead ing data. opinion o r statement appears in thi s Jo urnal , they wish
`to make it clear that the data and opinio ns appenring in the artic les and advertise ments here in are the responsibility of the contributor or advertiser concerned.
`Accordingly. the publi shers, the editorial commit!ee and their respecti ve employees, officers and agents accept no liability whatsoever for the conseq uences of any
`such inaccurate or misleadi ng data, opinio n or statement.
`
`Typeset by Photo-graphi cs, Honiton, Devon, UK
`Printed on acid-free paper, effective with Volume 12, Issue I, 1993
`
`BEQ 1007
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Journal of Industrial Microbiology (1996} 16, 145- !54
`© !996 Society for Industrial Microbiology 0! 69-4!46/96/$! 2.00
`
`I Review: Optimizing inducer and culture conditions for
`1 expression of foreign proteins under the control of the lac
`I promoter
`I RS Donovan 1
`2 CW Robinson 1
`2 and BR Glick2
`•
`•
`'
`I Departments of 1Chemical Engineering; 2 Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
`
`I
`
`1
`
`•
`
`I This review examines factors which influence the expression of foreign proteins in Escherichia coli under the tran(cid:173)
`scri ptional control of the lac and tac promoters, and discusses conditions for maximizing the production of a foreign
`! protein using this system. Specifically, the influence of IPTG (isopropyl-{3-o-thiogalactoside) concentration, tempera(cid:173)
`ture, composition of the growth medium, the point in the growth curve at which cells are induced with either IPTG
`or lactose, and the duration of the induction phase are discussed.
`
`I Keywords: lac promoter; lac promoter; recombinant DNA; protein overexpression; fermentation strategies; IPTG ; lactose
`
`I
`d
`.
`· lntro uctton
`. During the past two decades, research utilizing recombinant
`1 DNA tec hnology has led to the development of a variety
`/ of products for use in fields as di verse as cancer treatment
`and pulp bleaching [29]. The majority of these products
`have been produced using Escherichia coli [ 17,3 1 ,36] since
`\
`, this bacterium has been well characteri zed at the molec ular
`level and the introd ucti on of foreign genes into it is easil y
`accomp lished. In addition, E. coli can be grown rapidly to
`. a high cell density using inex pensive media and readil y
`{available fermentation eq uipment.
`I A wide vari ety of commerciall y important proteins has
`been expressed in recombinant E. coli, including xy lose
`1 i omerase [8], xy lanase [63] T4 DNA ligase [86] , CD4
`[70] , and a ran ge of different human immunomod ulators,
`
`I growth factors, hormones, blood proteins and viral antigens
`
`· for use as vaccines [34]. The expression of these proteins
`\ in E. coli is generall y accomplished by placing the foreign
`I gene in to a multi-copy plasmid vector under the transcrip-
`tional control of either a consti tuti ve or regul atable strong
`I promoter. Constitutive promoter systems provide a simple
`means of overproducing a foreign protein in a bacterial cell
`,, since the target protein is continuall y expressed . Unfortu(cid:173)
`natel y, continuous hi gh level expression often causes a
`J drain or metabolic burden on the cell 's energy resources
`leading
`to a reduction or
`inhibition of cell growth
`1 [12,30,80]. Since the overall yield of the target protein is
`a fun ction of both the cell yield (g of cells L - t) and the yield
`J of product per cell , the reduced cell growth th at generall y
`accompani es constitutive expression leads to lowe r yields
`of the target protein than is possible when using regulatable
`I promoter systems.
`Regulatable promoter systems provide the abi lity to 'turn
`1, on' the expression of a foreign gene by varying an environ(cid:173)
`! mental factor such as temperature [66,86,89], dissolved
`
`I -------------------------------------
`1 Correspondence: BR Glick. Dept of Biology. University of Waterloo.
`IVaterloo. Ontario, Canada N2L 3G I
`( ~cceived II September 1995 ; accepted 6 December 1995
`I
`
`oxygen tension [4 1 ,6 1] or the concentration of a particular
`component in the growth medium [ 18,59]. For exam ple,
`the bacteriophage lambda pL and pR promoters in conjunc(cid:173)
`tion with a temperature sensiti ve cl 857 repressor gene can
`be thermally induced when the temperature of the fermen(cid:173)
`tation broth is raised from the growth-optimum temperature
`of 30-35°C to 42°C [56,86]. The E. coli trp and phoA pro(cid:173)
`moters are induced fo llowing depletion of tryptophan and
`phosphates, respectively, from the medium [ 18,70] , while
`the lac promoter is induced in the presence of lactose or
`isopropy l-{3-o-th iogalactoside (IPTG) [59). The ability to
`induce foreign gene expression at will allows for the separ(cid:173)
`ation of cell growth from the product synthesis or induction
`phase of the fermentation . After obtaining a hi gh concen(cid:173)
`tration of cells in a fermenter during the growth phase, the
`foreign gene can then be induced resulting in higher total
`yields of the recombinant protein than otherwise could be
`achieved using constitutive express ion . In some cases, the
`level of transcription of the foreign gene can be regulated
`by using an appropri ate level of the inducing stimulus. This
`in turn can further improve yie lds by allowing the level of
`expression to be optimi zed during the induction phase. In
`order to take advantage of the flexibility of inducible pro(cid:173)
`moter systems, the optimal point in the fermentation for
`inducing expression as well as the optimal level of inducer
`that needs to be used in the process must be determined.
`The lac promoter from the E. coli lactose operon is one
`of the promoters most commonly used to regu late the
`ex press ion of recombinant genes in bacteria. It is the most
`we ll understood of all bacterial promoter and ha been
`extensively characterized at the molecular level [6,69] ;
`however, only a small number of studies have optimized
`the production of recombinant proteins using this system.
`This article rev iews factors that influence foreign protein
`expression from the lac (or tac) promoter(s) in E. coli, and
`thus provides a starting point for researchers attempting to
`optimize the condi ti ons for expressing a target protein using
`this system.
`
`BEQ 1007
`Page 3
`
`

`
`146
`
`Transcriptional regulation of the lac promoter
`
`Co n ~;!;; Hirjllion or
`Glucose
`Lactose
`
`cA ~W
`
`Inc Promoter-Op..e.r.a1.QL_Rcg inn
`
`Level of
`Tri]nscripllon
`
`Expression of foreign proteins in E. coli
`RS Donovan et at
`
`l
`
`The lactose (lac) operon in wild-type E. coli consists of
`three genes (lacZ, lacY and lacA) which encode proteins
`responsible for metabolism of the sugar lactose. The lacZ
`protein, {3-galactosidase, converts lactose to glucose and
`gal actose ; the lacY gene codes for lactose permease which
`provides the active transport of lactose across the cytoplas(cid:173)
`mic membrane, while the lacA gene product has transace(cid:173)
`tylase activity and may function to detoxify lactose analogs
`which are harmful to the cell [91].
`Transcription from the lac promoter is regulated by the
`lac repressor, the product of the lacl gene [9,69]. In the
`absence of inducer (ie lactose or IPTG), the lac repressor
`inhibits transcription from the lac promoter by binding to
`the operator reg ion of the lac operon. When the repressor
`is bound to the operator, its presence prevents the proper
`binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter region so that
`transcription of the lac genes does not occur. However,
`since a chemical equilibrium exists between bound and
`unbound repressor molecules , the operator site is not con(cid:173)
`tinuously occupied by the lac repressor and thus there is
`generally a low basa l level of transcription of the lac genes.
`When the cell encounters lactose or other ga lactosides,
`transcription of the lac genes may increase up to 1000-
`fold [40]. The increased transcription occurs because, once
`in side the cell , a small portion of the lactose is converted,
`by the basal level of {3-galactosidase, to an intermediate
`compound known as allolactose, which then binds to the
`repressor protein. This binding causes a conformational
`change in the repressor protein reducing its affinity for the
`lac operator. With no repressor bound at the operator
`region, sign ificantly increased transcription of the lac genes
`occurs and express ion is induced.
`Transcription from the lac promoter is also regulated by
`the binding of the catabo lite activator prote in (CAP) to the
`promoter region [9 ,69]. When CAP bi nels to the promoter,
`it increases the affinity of the promoter for RNA poly(cid:173)
`merase, thereby increasi ng transcription of the lac genes.
`The affinity of CAP for the promoter is enhanced by its
`association with cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP).
`Cellular levels of cAMP are highest when the amount of
`glucose in the medium is lowest. Thus , provided that no
`repressor is bound to the operator, hi gh intracellular con(cid:173)
`centrations of cAMP lead to high levels of cAMP-CAP
`complex at the promoter si te and cause a hi gh leve l of tran(cid:173)
`scription of the lac genes . These interaction s are illustrated
`schematicall y in Figure I [I].
`Catabolite repress ion allows E. coli to metaboli ze glu(cid:173)
`cose preferentially prior to lactose (and a variety of other
`sugars) when a mi xture of sugars is present in the growth
`medium. When the cell encounters hi gh concentrations of
`glucose, transport of glucose into the cell reduces the intra(cid:173)
`cellular level of cAMP. Thus , even in the presence of
`indu cer, a hi gh concentration of g lucose leads to a low level
`of transcription from the lac promoter (Figure I). In small
`sca le culture, the effects of catabolite repress ion however,
`may be reduced by adding cAMP to the growth medium
`lac promoter [ 10]. Glucose al so
`when
`inducing
`the
`indirectly modulates express ion from the lac promoter by a
`process known as carbohydrate-mediated inducer exclusion
`
`Low
`
`Low
`
`H igh
`
`low
`
`High
`
`Low
`
`Low
`
`Pro moter
`
`lacZ
`
`Low
`
`High
`
`High
`
`Low
`
`Promoter
`
`O~ c r<lto r
`
`/rtr Z
`
`low
`
`cAM P
`
`Low
`
`:-ligh
`
`High
`
`larZ
`
`High
`
`Figure 1 Effect or glucose and lactose concentrati on in the growth
`medium on the level of transcripti on from the lac promoter in £. coli.
`Adapted from [I].
`
`[65]. Glucose (and certain other sugars , such as fru ctose
`
`and mannitol) are transported across the cytoplasmic mem- !
`port of glucose into the cell results in dephosphorylation of I
`·l
`
`brane via the phosphotransferase sys tem (PTS). The trans(cid:173)
`
`the glucose specific-PTS enzyme liiGJc, which in its non(cid:173)
`phosphorylated form interacts with lactose permease and
`inhibits the transport of lactose, and hence the lac inducer,
`into the cell .
`IPTG is common ly used for inducing expression from
`the lac promoter and offers a number of distinct advan(cid:173)
`tages, espec iall y in sma ll sca le experiments. Unlike lactose
`and other galactosides, IPTG is a metabolic-free, or gratu(cid:173)
`itous inducer, because it is not metaboli zed by the cell. This
`ensures that the level of induction remains constant follow(cid:173)
`ing the addition of IPTG to the growth medium. IPTG is
`transported into the cell by methods other than lac perme(cid:173)
`ase making this compound less susceptible to
`inducer
`exclus ion by glucose and suga rs whose assimilati on is
`mediated by the PTS system.
`A number of variations on the lac promoter have been
`reported. For example, the lacUV5 promoter contains a
`mutation in the consensus region of the lac promoter that
`increases the promoter strength [69], and therefore has been
`used in place of the wild type lac promoter in some high
`express ion plasmid vectors [28,82]. The lac prom oter, a
`tryptophan (flp) and lacUYS promoters
`hybrid of the
`[4,23], is reported to be 5-10 times stronger th an the
`lacUVS promoter [23 ,24] and is induced using IPTG and
`other ga lactosides while not being subject to catabo lite
`repression.
`
`•
`
`Expression of foreign proteins
`
`There are a wide variety of factors which influ ence the
`express ion of foreign proteins in E. coli. As mentioned pre(cid:173)
`viously, the presence of reco mbinant plasmid DNA and the
`expression of a recombinant protein generally im poses a
`metabolic drain on the cells' energy resources [ L3.30]. This
`added metabolic burden often reduces cellular growth rates,
`causes segregationa l and structu ral plasmid in stability and
`causes metabolic, genetic and physiological changes in the
`host cell which, in turn , may substantiall y affect the total
`and fun ctional yi eld s of a target product. While in some
`
`BEQ 1007
`Page 4
`
`

`
`- - - - - - -------
`
`- ----..,
`
`147
`
`cases problems of metabolic burden and low yields of
`recombinant protein have been solved by altering codon
`usage [38] or host cell metaboli sm through genetic manipu(cid:173)
`lation [21 ], functi onal yields ha ve also been improved by
`modifyi ng culture conditions and the level of recombinant
`protein ex press ion during th e induction phase [73 ,86].
`Thus, it is important to understand the influence of con(cid:173)
`dit ions such as temperature, growth medium composition,
`ind ucer concentration as well as the point of induction and
`the duration of the induction phase on the ex pression of the
`target protein in E. coli.
`
`The effect of IPTG concentration
`Despite the popularity of the lac expression system for pro-
`! ducing recombinant products, few studi es in the literature
`have reported optimizi ng the IPTG concentration for
`ind ucing recombinant gene express ion , and in most cases
`the reasons for using a particul ar level of IPTG are rarely
`stated. While a wide range of IPTG concentrati ons, ranging
`from 0.005
`to 5 mmol L - I ,
`have been
`reported
`I (19 ,32,62,82,87], ex pression is commonly induced using
`· I mmol L- 1 IPTG.
`As a result of metabolic burden (so metimes called meta(cid:173)
`bol ic load), th e hi gh concentrations of inducer that are often
`used in an effort to fully induce the lac promoter do not
`necessarily lead to maximal expression of a target protein
`[30]. In many cases. the optimal inducer co ncentration is
`I chosen to bal ance the decreasing yields of recombinant
`1 cells following induction with increasing cellular leve ls of
`target protein [ 12]. For example, in studying the dynamics
`of chlorampheni col-acetyl-transferase (CAT) expression
`· using the tac promoter, Bentley er a/ [ 12] showed that the
`\ increased specific CAT producti vity (g CAT sy nthesized
`I g- 1 biomass), following mid-log phase induction with IPTG
`reduced the specific growth rate of the cell s in batch cui(cid:173)
`lure. Moreover, the severity of the reduction in speci fie
`growth rate increased with increas ing levels of CAT protein
`. expression. At hi gh inducer concentrati ons (3.4 mmol IPTG
`L- 1
`), the reduction in specific growth rate was so severe (ie
`1 80%) that it led to the early onset of the stationary phase
`and cell death, while at slightl y lower levels (2. 1 mmol
`1 L - I), the cells partially recovered from the initial shock fol(cid:173)
`lowing inducti on and es tablished a constant specific growth
`rate that was 60% lower than pre-induction levels. Thus, the
`4 overall level of CAT ex pression in batch culture involved a
`tradeoff between increas ing product ex pression in the cell
`and decreasing cell yields resulting from a lower specific
`growth rate followin g induction with !PTG. As a result, use
`of an intermediate IPTG concentration of approximately
`I 0.8- 1.0 mmol IPTG L - I balanced the opposing phenomena
`. of increasing target protein expression and decreasing cell
`\ Yields to max imi ze the overall expression of the recombi-
`1 nant product [ 12].
`translational
`transcriptional and
`the
`To understand
`t responses to varying levels of induction with IPTG , Wood
`and Peretti [88] used continuous culture to study the steady(cid:173)
`ltate responses of cells to increasing levels of metabolic
`load when producing recombinant {3-galactosidase. The {3-
`lgalactos idase was under the transcriptional control of the
`lac promoter and the metabolic load was modulated by
`I inducing with 0.0 I to 7.5 mmol IPTG L - I. Under these con-
`
`Expression of foreign proteins in E. coli
`RS Donovan et a/
`
`ditions, the syn thesis rate of {3-galactosidase mRNA and
`the steady state activity of this enzyme increased linearl y
`• Further
`with lPTG co ncentration up to I mmol IPTG L - 1
`increases in IPTG concentration did not lead to stoichio(cid:173)
`metric increases in /a cZ transcription. While it was possible
`that most of the lac promoters were full y induced above
`I mmol IPTG L- 1 (due to the complete titration of repressor
`molecul es by IPTG), in thi s case it appears that degradation
`of the {3-galactosidase mRNA played an important role in
`limiting protein expression. The degradati on rate of the {3-
`galactosidase mRNA increased with increasing levels of
`induction such that the 42-fold increase in the {3-galactoside
`mRNA sy nthesis rate when the inducer concentration was
`increased over the range studied led to only a 4-fold
`increase in the steady state level of {3-galactosidase mRNA.
`The fact that rai sing the IPTG concentrati on from I to
`7.5 mmol L- 1 increased the /a cZ transc ription rate by 75 %,
`but increased the steady state levels of {3-galactosidase
`rnRNA and activity by only 32 % and 22%, respectivel y,
`suggested that rnRNA stability rather than transcription
`limited product expression .
`The stud y of Wood and Peretti [88] also suggested ways
`in whi ch the inducti on of recombinant mRNA sy nthesis can
`alter the cellular processes and redirect energy resources.
`At low levels of inducer (< 0.1 mrnol IPTG L- 1
`), increased
`levels of transcription red uced the sy nthesis of ribosomal
`RNA (rRNA). However, when IPTG concentrations greater
`than 0. I mmol L - I were used, the cells responded to induc(cid:173)
`tion by increasing the sy nthesis rate and steady state levels
`of ribosomal RNA. It was theorized that induction of the
`tac promoters with IPTG diverted RNA pol ymerase away
`from ribosome operons, lead ing to the observed decrease
`in rRNA synthesis. At hi gh levels of induction, the
`increased steady state level s of mRNA sy nthesis may have
`severely depleted the pool of free non-translating ribosomes
`in the cell. Under these conditions, the recombinant cells
`may have di verted energy into producing rRNA to increase
`translationa l capaci ty in order to deal with increased trans(cid:173)
`lational demands. Thus, under transient conditions, this
`diversion of energy (metabolic load) to
`increase trans(cid:173)
`lational capacity observed by Wood and Peretti [88], may
`account for at least a temporary reduction in growth rate
`and plasmid stability as the cell attempts to keep pace with
`the added burden of the recombinant gene expression .
`Induction with IPTG also appears to cause a variety of
`stress res ponses in the cell. In non-transform ed strains with
`a single lac promoter on the chromosome, increased syn(cid:173)
`thesis of the heat shock proteins DnaK, GroEL, Gro ES was
`observed 30 min after the addition of 0.5 mmol IPTG L- 1
`[ 45]. A temporary inhibition of H35 protein- normall y pre(cid:173)
`sent onl y during ex ponential growth-following inducti on
`was also encountered, uggest ing that cells must ada pt to
`even low levels of expression induced with IPTG . As well ,
`proteolytic degradati on of abnormal proteins can be influ(cid:173)
`enced by the level of induction with IPTG, with degra(cid:173)
`dation by some pathways increasing or decreasing with
`increasing IPTG levels [44]. High level recombinant pro(cid:173)
`tein ex pression usin g IPTG has also been shown to induce
`the ex pression of a variety of proteases in medi a where the
`concentrations of certain amino acids may be limiting [32].
`The location of the lac repressor as well as the quantity
`
`BEQ 1007
`Page 5
`
`

`
`148
`
`Expression of foreign proteins in E. coli
`RS Donovan et a/
`
`of lac repressor molecules produced in the cell wi ll greatly
`affect the level of IPTG needed to full y induce express ion
`from the lac promoter. For example, in cases with hi gh
`plasmid
`copy number, plasmid-borne
`lac or
`lac
`promoter/operators may partially or completely
`titrate
`repressor molecules expressed from the chromosomal lac!
`gene. As a re ult, fu ll inducti on may be achieved with a ·
`
`little as 0.001 - 0.1 mmol IPTG L- 1, depend ing on plasmid
`copy number during the induction phase [48]. In add ition,
`in those instances in which the region of the plasmid DNA
`that controls the plasmid copy number is just downs tream
`from a lac or lac promoter, and there is no strong transcrip(cid:173)
`tion terminator between these elements, induction of the
`promoter may artificially increase the plasmid copy number
`(ie cause a phenomenon know n as runaway replication).
`Thi s may result in a higher level of gene expression as a
`consequence of the increased gene copy number [84].
`While this strategy mi ght seem to be an attractive way to
`increase the level of forei gn gene ex pression, the potential
`for plasmid instability and other metabolic alterations as a
`consequence is li kely to be problematic especially in large
`scale ferme ntati ons.
`In other cases, where the gene fo r /ad is present on the
`recombinant plasmid to prevent promoter leakiness (ie hi gh
`levels of non-induced background expression), the level of
`lac repressor present wi ll depend on the plasmid copy num(cid:173)
`ber in the cell , and IPTG concentratio ns required for a parti(cid:173)
`cular level of induction wi ll vary accord ingly [88]. Thus,
`the optimal concentration of IPTG appears to be hi ghl y sys(cid:173)
`tem-dependent, and th e types of metabolic changes found
`at the particular IPTG concentrat ions used by Wood and
`Peretti [88] may occur at different concentrations of IPTG
`in other sys tems. Thi s may explain why the optimal induc(cid:173)
`tion of glutathione-S-transferase using the lac promoter in
`the /ad-containing strain DH5a req uired onl y 0.062 mmol
`IPTG L - I [87]. The mutant /ad" gene which produces I 0-
`folcl more repressor than /ad, is often used in recombinant
`strains to provide better repression of recombinant gene
`express ion in the absence of inducer. Thus, the /adq pheno(cid:173)
`type is generall y optimall y induced using greater concen(cid:173)
`trations of IPTG compared to wild type /ad strains.
`Recombinant protein expression
`in strains containing
`either /ad" or plasmid borne lac! may be lower than th at
`of wild-type /ad strains, even when fu ll y induced with high
`levels of IPTG [ 48]. While plas mid-borne /ad genes pro(cid:173)
`vide more complete repression of the lac promoter, the hi gh
`level of repressor protein adds to the metabolic burden of
`recombinant cells and may affect the cells' translational
`capacity [88]. Mathematical models have been developed
`to evaluate the effects of different promoter/repressor con(cid:173)
`fi gurations on recombinant gene ex pression [48,52,53] and
`translational capacity [49] in E. coli . These models, how(cid:173)
`ever, do not account for situati ons such as inclusion body
`formation or for other limitations such as protein fo lding
`and sec retion to the periplasm.
`The characteristics of a particu lar protei n, its desired
`fo rm and the cellular location of the ex pressed protein may
`also signifi cantl y influence the level of IPTG u eel for opti (cid:173)
`mal inducti on. For example, the act ivity of secreted pro(cid:173)
`teins is often enh anced when exp ression is on ly parti all y
`induced. Reducing IPTG co ncentration from I to 0.005
`
`mmol L- 1 greatly enhanced the acti vity of subtilisi n E
`secreted to the peripl asm, vvhile reducing cell lysis [82].
`Replacing the lac promoter with the stronger /acUV5 pro(cid:173)
`moter to increase the ex press ion of secreted Fab fragments,
`provided a 5- to I 0-folcl increase in target protei n yield , but
`gave little to no improvement in the yield of function al Fab
`mo lecul es [76]. Simi larly, a 2- to 10-folcl increase in the
`yield of functional secreted Fab fragments was observed
`when the lac promoter was induced with 0.01 - 0.1 mmol
`IPTG L- 1
`, rather than 1.0 mmol L - I [73]. Effic ient pro(cid:173)
`duction of periplasmic {3-lactamase and human epidermal
`growth factor from the wc promoter also utili zed 0.1 mmol
`IPTG L - I
`[ 19]. In all of these cases, it appears that the
`solubility and the proper foldin g of secreted proteins ben(cid:173)
`efited greatl y from the lower transc ription rates when less
`than the 'standard ' inducer co ncentration of l mmol IPTG
`L - I was used.
`In contrast to the abo ve examples, hi gher levels of tran(cid:173)
`scription have been used to enhance the expression an d/or
`locali zation of some secreted proteins. For example, high
`level ex pres ion from a lac promoter, in overnight cultures,
`was used to improve the ex pression of periplasmic {3-lacta(cid:173)
`mase activity and enhance outer membrane permeabi lity
`so th at 90% of the {3-lactamase activity was released to the
`cul tu re medium [28]. Leakage of the periplasmic proteins,
`however, requ ired hi gh levels of target protein ex pression,
`since leakage of {3-lactamase acti vi ty to the mediu m was
`not observed when a weaker /acll mutant promoter was
`used. This periplasmic leakage, at hi gh levels of {3-lactam(cid:173)
`ase ex pression, may occur because the secretion of the
`forei gn protein interferes with the ex pression of the outer
`membrane proteins and, therefore, weakens the integrity of
`the outer membrane [28].
`Differences in the level of periplasmic expression with
`increasing promoter strength may be clue in part to the nat(cid:173)
`ure of the recombinant product itself. {3-l ac tamase is a
`native E. coli protein with a very effi cient secretion signal
`seq uence. High transcription and secretion rates for this
`protein may, therefore, be possible since evoluti on has
`li ke ly 'optimi zed' its structure for secretion into the per(cid:173)
`iplasm. {3-Iactamase may also fold more efficientl y than
`many forei gn proteins in the periplasm, so that expression
`limitations of acti vity clue to proper fo lding and/or aggre(cid:173)
`gation may be less significant. In the case of antibody frag(cid:173)
`ments, the solubil ity and level of secretion of single chain
`F"s may be significantl y affected by the order in which the
`V H and V L domains are secreted [5]. For Fab and F,. frag(cid:173)
`ments, the individual light and heavy chains must fold and
`associate properly to form functional proteins. Thus, the
`expression of Fnb and F" fragments may become li mited at
`hi gher induction levels by the fo lding of each protein chain
`as we ll as the homocl imeri zation or incorrect chain a soci(cid:173)
`ations leading to aggregation [42]. Since point mutations
`in Fnb and F'" fragments have been found to signi ficantly
`improve their fo lding and soluble ex pression in the per(cid:173)
`iplasm [43]. the amino acid seq uence of a protein can sig(cid:173)
`nificantly influence its soluble and functiona l expression
`when secreted to th e periplasmi c space.
`The level of inducer required for optima l expression
`depends on the strength of th e promoter, the presence or
`absence of repressor genes on a pl asmid , the cellular
`
`BEQ 1007
`Page 6
`
`

`
`location of product express ion, the response of the cell to
`recombin ant prote in express ion, the so lubility of the target
`protein and the characteristics of the prote in itself. For
`inducing the expression of an intercellul ar recombinant pro(cid:173)
`tein , the use of l mmol IPTG L - I is a reasonable starting
`point since max im al induction is pred icted to occ ur for both
`tacT and /acl'~ strai ns at thi s level [48]. For secreted pro-
`1 tein s, however, IPTG concent

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket