throbber
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 69, No. 10, pp. 2904-2909, October 1972
`
`Biochemical Method for Inserting New Genetic Information into DNA of
`Simian Virus 40: Circular SV40 DNA Molecules Containing Lambda
`Phage Genes and the Galactose Operon of Escherichia coli
`(molecular hybrids/DNA joining/viral transformation/genetic transfer)
`
`DAVID A. JACKSON*, ROBERT H. SYMONSt, AND PAUL BERG
`
`Department of Biochemistry, Stsnfor!l University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305
`
`Contributed by Paul Berg, July 31, 197S
`
`ABSTRACT We have developed methods for covalently
`joining duplex DNA molecules to one another and have
`used these techniques to construct circular dimers of
`SV40 DNA and to insert a DNA segment containing lambda
`phage genes and the galactose operon of E. coli into SV40
`DNA. The method involves: (a) converting circular
`SV40 DNA to a linear form, (b) adding single-stranded
`homodeoxypolymeric extensions of defined oomposition
`and length to the 3' ends of one of the DNA strands with
`the enzyme terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (c)
`adding complementary homodeoxypolymeric extensions
`to the other DNA strand, (d) annealing the two DNA mole(cid:173)
`cules to form a circular duplex structure, and (e) filling
`the gaps and sealing nicks in this structure with E. coli
`DNA polymerase and DNA ligase to form a covalently
`closed-circular DNA molecule.
`
`Our goal is to develop a method by which new, functionally
`defined segments of genetic information can be introduced into
`mammalian cells. It is known that the DNA of the trans(cid:173)
`forming virus SV40 can enter into a stable, heritable, and
`presumably covalent association with the genomes of various
`mammalian cells (1, 2). Since purified SV40 DNA can also
`transform cells (although with reduced efficiency), it seemed
`possible that SV40 DNA molecules, into which a segment of
`functionally defined, nonviral DNA had been covalently
`integrated, could serve as vectors to transport and stabilize
`these nonviral DNA sequences in the cell genome. Ac(cid:173)
`cordingly, we have developed biochemical techniques that are
`generally applicable for joining covalently any two DNA
`molecules.f Using these techniques, we have constructed
`circular dimers of SV40 DNA; moreover, a DNA segment
`containing X phage genes and the galactose operon of Esche(cid:173)
`richia coli has been covalently integrated into the circular
`SV40 DNA molecule. Such hybrid DNA molectJles and others
`like them can be tested for their capacity to transduce foreign
`DNA sequences into mammalian cells, and can be used to
`determine whether these new nonviral genes can be expressed
`in a novel environment.
`
`• Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of
`Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich. 4&104.
`t Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University of
`Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001 Australia.
`t Drs. Peter Lobban and A. D. Kaiser of this department have
`performed experiments similar to ours and have obtained similar
`results using bacteriophage P22 DNA (Lobban, P. and Kaiser,
`A. D., in preparation).

`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`DNA. (a) Covalently closed-circular duplex SV40 DNA
`· [SV 40(I) 1 (labeled with [8H 1dT, 5 X 1 0• cpm/ ~g), free from
`SV 40 linear or oligomeric molecules [but containing 3-5%
`of nicked double-stranded circles-SV 40(II) 1 was purified
`from SV40-infected CV-1 cells (Jackson, D., & Berg, P., in
`preparation). (b) Closed-circular duplex Xdvgal DNA labeled
`with [8H1dT (2.5 X 104 cpm/~g), was isolated from an E. coli
`strain containing this DNA as an autonomously replicating
`plasmid (see ref. 3) by equilibrium sedimentation in CsCl(cid:173)
`ethidium bromide gradients (4) after lysis of the cells with de(cid:173)
`tergent. A more detailed characteri.?;ation of this DNA will
`be published later. Present information ·indicates that the
`Xdvgal (Xdv-120) DNA is a circular dimer containing tandem
`duplications of a sequence of several X phage genes (including
`C1, 0, and P) joined to the entire galactose operon of E. coli
`(Berg, D., Mertz, J., & Jackson, D., in preparation). DNA con(cid:173)
`centrations are given as molecular concentrations.
`Enzymes. The circular SV40 and Xdvgal DNA molecules
`were cleaved with the bacterial restriction endonuclease· RI
`(Yoshimori and Boyer, unpublished; the enzyme was gen(cid:173)
`erously made available to us by these workers). Phage
`X-exonuclease (given to us by Peter Lobban) was prepared
`according to Little et al. (5), calf-thymus deoxynucleotidyl
`terminal transferase (terminal transferase), prepared ac(cid:173)
`cording to Kato et al. (6), was generously sent to us by F. N.
`Hayes; E. coli DNA polymerase I Fraction VII (7) was a gift
`of Douglas Brutlag; and E. coli DNA ligase (8) and exo(cid:173)
`nuclease III (9) were kindly supplied by Paul Modrich.
`Substrates. [a-32P1deoxynucleoside triphosphates (specific
`activities 5-10 Ci/~mol) were synthesized by the method of
`Symons (10). All other reagents were obtained from com(cid:173)
`mercial sources.
`Centrifugations. Alkaline sucrose gradients were formed by
`diffusion from equal volumes of 5, 10, 15, and 20% su!)rose
`solutions with 2 mM EDTA containing, respectively, 0.2,
`0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 M NaOH, and 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2 M NaCI.
`100-~l samples were run on 3.8-ml gradients in a Beckman
`SW56 Ti rotor in a Beckman L2-65B ultracentrifuge at 4°
`and 55,000 rpm for the indicated times. 2- to 10-drop fractions
`were collected onto 2.5-cm diameter Whatman 3MM discs,
`dried without washing, and counted in PPO-dimethyl
`POPOP-toluene scintillator in a Nuclear Chicago Mark II
`
`2904
`
`BEQ 1006
`Page 1
`
`

`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69 (197~)
`
`Insertion of the Galactose Operon into SV40 DNA
`
`2905
`
`scintillation spectrometer. An overlap of 0.4% of 32P into
`the 3H channel was not corrected for.
`CsCl-ethidium bromide equilibrium centrifugation was per(cid:173)
`formed in a Beckman Type 50 rotor at 4° and 37,000 rpm for
`48 hr. SV40 DNA in 10 mM Tris·HCl ~pH 8.1)-1 mM Na
`EDTA-10 mM NaCl was adjusted to 1.566 g/ml of CsCl
`and 350 pg/ml of ethidium bromide. 30-Drop fractions were
`collected and aliquots were precipitated on Whatman GF /C
`filters with cold 2 N HCl; the filters were washed and counted.
`
`Electron Microscopy. DNA was spread for .electron micros(cid:173)
`copy by the aqueous method of Davis et al. (:11) and photo(cid:173)
`graphed in a Phillips EM 300. Projections of the molecules
`were traced on paper and measured with a Keuffel and Esser
`map measurer. Plaque-purified SV40(II) DNA was used as
`an internal length standard.
`
`C01Wersion of SV 40(!) DNA to Unit Length Linear DNA
`[SV40(LR1 )] with R 1 Endonuclease. [3H]SV40(I) DNA (18.7
`nM) in 100 mM Tris·HCl buffer (pH 7.5)-10 mM MgCl2-2
`mM 2-mercaptoethanol was incubated for 30 min at 37°
`with an amount of Rr previously determined to convert 1.5 ·
`times this amount of SV 40(I) to linear molecules [SV 40(LRr)];
`N a EDTA (30 mM) was added to stop the reaction, and the
`DNA was precipitated in 67% ethanol.
`
`Removal of 5'-Terminal Regions from SV40(LRI) with ;\
`Exonuclease. [3H]SV40(LRr) (15 nM) in 67 mM K-glycinate
`(pH 9.5), 4 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA was incubated at 0°
`with ;\-exonuclease (20 pg/ml) to yield [3H]SV40(LRrexo)
`DNA. Release of [3H]dTMP was measured by chromato(cid:173)
`graphing aliquots of the reaction on polyethyleneimine thin(cid:173)
`layer sheets (Brinkmann) in 0.6 M NH4HC03 and counting
`the dTMP spot and the origin (undegraded DNA).
`Addition of Homopolymeric Extensions to SV40(LRiexo)
`with Terminal Transferase. (3H]SV40(LRrexo) (50 nM) in 100
`mM K-cacodylate (pH 7.0), 8 mM MgCl2, 2 mM 2-mercapto(cid:173)
`ethanol, 150 pg/ml of bovine serum albumin, [a-32P]dNTP
`(0.2. mM for dATP, 0.4 mM for dTTP) was incubated with
`terminal transferase (3Q-60 pg/ml) at 37°. Addition of
`[ 32P]dNMP residues to SV40 DNA was measured by spotting
`aliquots of the reaction mixture on DEAE-paper discs
`(Whatman DE-81), washing each disc by suction with 50 ml
`(each) of 0.3 M NH4-formate (pH 7.8) and 0.25 M NH4HC03,
`and then with 20 mi of ethanol. To determine the proportion
`of SV40 linear DNA molecules that had acquired at least one
`"functional" (dA)n tail, we measured the amount of SV40
`DNA (3H counts) that could be bound to a Whatman GF/C
`filter (2.4-cm diameter) to which 150 pg of polyuridylic acid
`had been fixed (13). 15-pl Aliquots of the reaction mixture
`were mixed with 5 ml of 0.70 M NaCl-Q.07 M Na citrate
`(pH 7.0)-2% Sarkosyl, and filtered at rooin temperature
`through the poly(U) filters, at a flow rate of 3-5 ml/min.
`Each filter was washed by rapid suction with 50 ml of the same
`buffer at 0°, dried, and counted. Control experiments showed
`that 98-100% of [3H]oligo(dA)l25 bound to the filters under
`these conditions. When the ratio of [32P]dNMP to [3H]DNA
`reached the value equivalent to the desired length of the
`extension, the reaction was stopped with EDTA (30 mM) and
`2% Sarkosyl. The [3H]SV40(LRrexo)-[ 32P]dA or -dT DNA
`was purified by neutral sucrose gradient zone sedimentation
`to remove unincorporated dNTP, as well as any traces of
`SV40(I) orSV40(II) DNA.
`
`Formation of Hydrogen-Bonded Circular DNA Molecules.
`[32P]dA and -dT DNAs were mixed at concentrations of 0.15
`nM each in 0.1 M NaCl-10 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.1)-1 mM
`EDTA. The mixture was kept at 51° for 30 min, then cooled
`slowly to room temperature.
`
`Formation of Covalently Closed-Circular DNA Molecules.
`After annealing of the DNA, a mixture of the enzymes, sub(cid:173)
`strates, and cofactors needed for closure was added to the
`DNA solution and the mixture was incubated at 20° for 3-5
`hr. The final concentrations in the reaction mixture were:
`20 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.1), 1 mM EDTA, 6 mM MgCl2,
`50 pg/ml bovine-serum albumin, lOmM NH4Cl, 80 mM NaCl,
`0.052 mM DPN, 0.08 mM (each), dATP, dGTP, dCTP,
`and dTTP, (0.4 pg/ml) E. coli DNA polymerase I, (15 units/
`ml) E. coli ligase, and (0.4 unit/ml) E. coli exonuclease III.
`
`RESULTS
`
`General approach
`Fig. 1 outlines the general approach used to generate circular,
`covalently-closed DNA molecules from two separate DNAs.
`Since, in the present case, the units to be joined are them(cid:173)
`selves circular, the first step requires conversion of the circular
`structures to linear duplexes. This could be achieved by a
`double-strand scission at random locations (see Discussion)
`or, as we describe in this paper, at a unique site with Rr re(cid:173)
`striction endonuclease. Relatively short (5Q-100 nucleotides)
`poly(dA) or poly(dT) extensions are added on the 3'-hydroxyl
`termini of the linear duplexes with terminal transferase; prior
`
`5'PO --...::...-------01-1 3'
`3'HO
`OP5'
`
`D ;>. Exonucleo~
`D Terminal transfer~
`
`dATP or dTTP
`
`o'''IP~O=======~~ OH3'
`3'HO~
`OP5'
`or
`~ OH3'
`~'PO
`3'HO ~~=======co~P5'
`
`dT
`
`dA
`
`dT
`Fm. 1. General protocol for producing covalently closed
`SV40 dimer circles from SV40(I) DNA.
`*The four deoxynucleoside triphosphates and DPN are also
`present for the DNA polymerase and ligase reactions, respec(cid:173)
`tively.
`
`BEQ 1006
`Page 2
`
`

`
`2906
`
`Biochemistry: Jackson et al.
`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69 (1972)
`
`either dATP or dTTP resulted in appreciable addition of
`mononucleotidyl units to the DNA. But, for example, after
`addition of 100 residues of dA per end, only a small propor(cid:173)
`tion of the modified SV40 DNA would bind to filter discs
`containing poly(U) (13). This result indicated that initiation
`of
`terminal nucleotidyl addition was
`infrequent with
`SV40(La,1), but that once initiated those termini served as
`preferential primers for extensive homopolymer synthesis.
`Lobban and Kaiser (unpublished) found that P22 phage
`DNA became a better primer for homopolymer synthesis
`after incubation of the DNA with~ exonuclease. This enzyme
`removes, successively, deoxymononucleotides from 5'-phos(cid:173)
`phoryl termini of double-stranded DNA (15), thereby render(cid:173)
`ing the 3'-hydroxyl termini single-stranded. We confirmed
`their finding with SV40(La,x) DNA; after removal of 3Q-50
`
`4.1
`
`2.8
`
`+ +
`
`-8
`3
`25 ~
`I ..
`l5
`
`20
`
`160
`
`140-
`
`r,20
`fro
`8.00
`~
`;F60
`
`40
`
`700
`
`6001
`
`1::
`500-u
`~
`400~
`
`300~
`200
`
`100
`
`Fm. 2. Alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation of [3JIJSV40-
`(LRrexo)-[31P] (dA)so DNA. 0.16 p.g of DNA was centrifuged for
`6.0hr.
`
`removal of a short sequence (3Q-50 nucleotides) from the
`5'-phosphoryl termini by digestion with~ exonuclease facili(cid:173)
`tates the terminal transferase reaction. Linear duplexes con(cid:173)
`taining
`(dA),. extensions are annealed to the DNA to be
`joined containing (dT),. extensions at relatively low concen(cid:173)
`trations. The circular structure formed contains the two
`DNAs, held together by two hydrogen-bonded homopolymeric
`regions (Fig. 1). Repair of the four gaps is mediated by E.
`coli DNA polymerase with the four deoxynucleosidetriphos(cid:173)
`phates, and covalent closure of the ring structure is effected
`by E. coli DNA ligase; E. coli exonuclease III removes 3'(cid:173)
`phosphoryl residues at any nicks inadvertently introduced
`during the manipulations (nicks with 3'-phosphoryl ends
`cannot be sealed by ligase).
`
`Principal steps in the procedure
`
`Circular SV 40 DNA Can Be Opened to Linear Duplexes by
`Rr Endonuclease. Digestion of SV40(I) DNA with excess R1
`endonuclease yields a product that sediments at 14.5 S in
`neutral sucrose gradients and appears as a linear duplex with
`the same contour length as SV40(II) DNA when examined by
`electron microscopy [ (18); Jackson and Berg, in prepara(cid:173)
`tion; see Table 1]. The point of cleavage is at a unique site
`on the SV40 DNA, and few if any single-strand breaks are
`introduced elsewhere in the molecule (18); moreover, the
`termini at each end are 5'-phosphoryl, 3'-hydroxyl (Mertz,
`J., Davis, R., in preparation). Digestion of plaque-purified
`SV40 DNA under our conditions yields about 87% linear
`molecules, 10% nicked circles, and 3% residual supercoiled
`circles.
`
`Addition of Oligo(dA) or -(dT) Extensions to the 3'-Hydroxyl
`Termini of SV40 (LRr). Terminal transferase has been used
`to generate deoxyhomopolymeric extensions on the 3'(cid:173)
`hydroxyl termini of DNA (7); once the chain is initiated,
`chain propagation is statistical in that each chain grows at
`about the same rate (12). Although the length of the exten(cid:173)
`sions can be controlled by variation of either the time of in(cid:173)
`cubation or the amount of substrate, we have varied the time
`of incubation to minimize spurious nicking of the DNA by
`trace amounts of endonuclease activity in the enzyme prep(cid:173)
`aration; we have so far been unable to remove or selectively
`inhibit these nucleases (Jackson and Berg, in preparation).
`Incubation of SV40(La,1) with terminal transferase and
`
`bottom
`
`5
`
`25
`
`A 6 C 0
`
`20
`115
`10
`Fraction number
`FIG. 3. Alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation of [1H](cid:173)
`SV40(LRrexo)-[11P](dA)so and -(dT)so DNA incubated 4 hr
`with and without addition of E. coli DNA polymerase I (P),
`·ligase (L ), and exonuclease III (Ill). Conditions are described in
`Methods. 8-Drop fractions were collected. Samples A, C, and D
`'were centrifuged for 60 min, sample B for 90 min. Line A, dA(cid:173)
`ended, plus dT-ended SV40 linears, plus (P+L+III) (31P,
`e; 3JI, O); line B, dT-ended, SV40 omitted, plus (P+L+III)
`( 11P, "'); line C, dA-ended SV40 omitted, plus (P+L+III)
`(11P, •); lineD, dA-ended plus dT-ended SV40 linears, without
`(P+L+III) (11P, .&). 3H profiles are not shown for lines B, C, and
`D, but all show that the SV40 DNA sediments in its normal
`monomeric position. The np and 3H profiles in line A are shifted
`to a faster-sedimenting position with respect to the up profile
`in line D because SV40 strands are covalently linked to one
`another through (dA)so or (dT)so bridges in most of the molecules,
`whether or not covalently closed-circles are formed. Very little
`31P remains associated with the SV40 DNA in lines Band C be(cid:173)
`cause tails that remain single-stranded are degraded to 5'-mono(cid:173)
`nucleotides by the 3'- to 5'-exonuclease activity of E. coli DNA
`polymerase I (7 ).
`The arrows indicate the position in the gradient of different size
`supercoiled marker DNAs; the number is the multiple of SV40
`DNA molecular size (1.0).
`
`BEQ 1006
`Page 3
`
`

`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69 (1972)
`
`Insertion of the Galactose Operon into SV40 DNA
`
`2907
`
`nucleotides per 5'-end (see Methods), the number of SV40(Lai)
`molecules that could be bound to poly(U) filters after incuba(cid:173)
`tion with terminal transferase and dATP increased 5- to 6-
`fold. Even after separation of the strands of the SV 40(LRiexo)(cid:173)
`dA, a substantial proportion of the 3H-label in the DNA was
`still bound by the poly(U) filter, indicating that both 3'(cid:173)
`hydroxy termini in the duplex DNA can serve as primers.
`The weight-average length of the homopolymer extensions
`was 50-100 residues per end. Zone sedimentation of [3H](cid:173)
`SV40(LR1exo)-[32P](dA)80 (this particular preparation, which
`is described in Methods, had on the average, 80 dA residues
`per end) in an alkaline sucrose gradient showed that (i) 60--
`70% of the SV40 DNA strands are intact, (ii) the [32P](dA)so
`is covalently attached to the [3H]SV40 DNA, and (iii) the
`distribution of oligo(dA) chain lengths attached to the SV40
`DNA is narrow, indicating that the deviation from the cal(cid:173)
`culated mean length of 80 is small (Fig. 2). SV40(LR1exo),
`having (dT)80 extensions, was prepared with [32P]dTTP and
`gave essentially the same results when analyzed as described
`above.
`
`Hydrogen-Bonded Circular Molecules Are Formed by An(cid:173)
`nealing SV.~O(LRrexo)-(dA)so and SV 40(LRrexo)-(dT)so To(cid:173)
`gether. When SV40(LRiexo)-(dA)so and SV40(LRiexo)-(dT)so
`were annealed together, 3Q-60% of the molecules seen by
`electron microscopy were circular dimers; linear monomers,
`linear dimers, and more complex branched forms were also
`seen. If SV40(LRiexo)-(dA)so or -(dT)so alone was annealed,
`no circles were found. Centrifugation of annealed prepara(cid:173)
`tions in neutral sucrose gradients showed that the bulk of the
`SV40 DNA sedimented faster than modified unit-length
`linears (as would be expected for circular and linear dimers,
`as well as for higher oligomers). Sedimentation in alkaline
`gradients, however, showed only unit-length single strands
`containing the oligonucleotide tails (as seen in Fig. 2).
`
`Covalently Closed-Circular DNA Molecules Are Formed by
`Incubation of Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes with DNA Poly(cid:173)
`merase, Ligase, and Exonuclease III. The hydrogen-bonded
`complexes described above can be sealed by incubation with
`the E. coli enzymes DNA polymerase I, ligase, and exonuclease
`III, plus their substrates and cofactors. Zone sedimentation
`in alkaline sucrose gradients (Fig. 3) shows that 20% of the
`
`14
`
`14
`
`12
`
`• 12
`•
`b10
`-
`10
`~ 8
`fr
`a.6
`Ill
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`4
`
`I>
`
`-1 1
`
`2
`
`2 A
`
`J
`0
`0
`A ~~2~-4~~6~~8~~10~~12~~14~~~~~~~~~ A
`bottom
`Fraction number
`
`FIG. 4. CsCl-ethidium bromide equilibrium centrifugation
`of the products analyzed in Fig. 4. Line A, dA-ended, plus dT(cid:173)
`ended SV40 linears, plus (P+L+III) (32P, e; 3H, O); line B, the
`same mixture without (P+L+III) (32P, A; aH, t.).
`
`TABLE 1. Relative lengths of SV40 and "Advgal-120
`DNA molecules
`
`DNA species
`
`SV40(II)
`SV40(LRI)t
`(SV40-dA dT).
`>..dvgal-120(1)
`Xdvgal-120(LRI)
`Xdvgal-SV 40
`Xdv-1
`
`Length ± standard
`deviation in
`SV40 units*
`
`Number of
`molecules in
`sample
`
`1.00
`1.00 ± 0.03
`2.06 ± 0.19
`4.09 ± 0.14
`2.00 ± 0.04
`2.95 ± 0.04
`2.78 ± 0.05
`
`224
`108
`23
`65
`163
`76
`13
`
`*The contour length of plaque-purified SV40(Il) DNA is
`defined as 1.00 unit.
`t Data supplied by J. Morrow.
`
`input 32P label derived from the oligo(dA) and -(dT) tails
`sediments with the 3H label present in the SV40 DNA, in the
`position expected of a covalently closed-circular SV 40 dimer
`(7Q-75 S). About the same amount of labeled DNA bands
`in a CsCl-ethidium bromide gradient at a buoyant density
`characteristic of covalently closed-circular DNA (Fig. 4).
`DNA isolated from the heavy band of the CsCl-ethidium
`bromide gradient contains primarily circular molecules, with
`a contour length twice that of SV40(II) DNA (Table 1) when
`viewed by electron microscopy. No covalently closed DNA is
`formed if either one of the linear precursors is omitted from
`the annealing step or if the enzymes are left out of the closure
`reaction. We conclude, therefore, that two unit-length linear
`SV40 molecules have been joined to form a covalently closed(cid:173)
`circular dimer.
`Covalent closure of the hydrogen-bonded SV40 DNA di(cid:173)
`mers is dependent on Mg2+, all four deoxynucleoside triphos(cid:173)
`phates, E. coli DNA polymerase I, and ligase, and is inhibited
`by 98% if exonuclease III is omitted (Lobban and Kaiser
`first observed the need for exonuclease III in the joining of
`P22 molecules; we confirmed their finding with this system).
`Exonuclease III is probably needed to remove 3'-phosphate
`groups from 3'-phosphoryl, 5'-hydroxyl nicks introduced by
`the endonuclease contaminating the terminal transferase
`preparation. 3'-phosphoryl groups are potent inhibitors of
`E. coli DNA polymerase I (14) and termini having 5'-hydroxyl
`groups cannot be sealed by E. coli ligase (8). The 5'-hydroxyl
`group can be removed and replaced by a 5'-phosphoryl group
`by the 5'- to 3'-exonuclease activity of E. coli DNA poly(cid:173)
`merase I (7).
`
`Preparation of the Galactose Operon for Insertion into SV 40
`DNA. The galactose operon of E. coli was obtained from a
`"Advgal DNA; "Advgal is a covalently closed, supercoiled DNA
`molecule four times as long as SV40(II) DNA (Table 1). After
`complete digestion of "Advgal DNA with the R1 endonuclease,
`linear molecules two times the length of SV40(II) DNA are
`virtually the exclusive product (Table 1). This population has
`a unimodal length distribution by electron microscopy and ap(cid:173)
`pears to be homogeneous by ultracentrifugal criteria (Jackson
`and Berg, in preparation). The R1 endonuclease seems, there(cid:173)
`fore, to cut "Advgal circular DNA into two equal length linear
`molecules. Since one Rr endonuclease cleavage per "Adv mono(cid:173)
`meric unit occurs in the closely related "Adv-204 (Jackson and
`Berg, in preparation), it is likely that "Advgal is cleaved at the
`
`BEQ 1006
`Page 4
`
`

`
`2908
`
`Biochemistry: Jackson et al.
`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69 (197e)
`
`8
`
`7
`
`!I
`
`..
`
`20
`
`18
`
`16
`
`70 , ..
`
`~
`12 u
`-8
`3
`tO"
`~ ..
`
`8
`
`60
`
`!10
`
`..0
`
`30
`
`tO
`
`6
`
`..
`
`0
`
`~ .................. ~
`
`25
`
`A 6 C
`
`!I
`iO
`20
`1!1
`F"raction numlo4r
`bottom
`FIG. 5. Alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation of annealed
`(3H]SV40(LRrexo)-[ 81P] (dA)so and [8H]Advgal-1110) (LRrexo)(cid:173)
`[32P] (dT)80 incubated for 3 hr with and without (P+L+III).
`Centrifugation was for 60 min. Line A, dA-ended SV40, plus
`dT-ended Advgal-1110 linea.rs, plus (P+L+III)(IIP, e; 8H, O);
`line B, dT-ended >.dvgal-1110 linears, plus dT-ended SV40 linea.rs,
`plus (P+L+III) (32P, &); line C,dA-ended SV40 linears, plus
`dT-ended Advgal-1110 linears, without (P+L+III) (31P, •).
`The arrows indicate the position in the gradient of supercoiled
`marker DNAs having the indicated multiple of SV40 DNA mo(cid:173)
`lecular size.
`
`same sites and, therefore, that each linear piece contains an
`intact galactose operon.
`The purified Xdvgal (La1) DNA was prepared for joining
`to SV40 DNA by treatment with A-exonuclease, followed by
`terminal transferase and [32P]dTTP, as described for SV40-
`(Lax).
`
`Formation of fJovalenay Closed-Circular DNA Molecules
`Containing both SV40 and Xdvgal DNA. Annealing of [3H](cid:173)
`[1H]Xdvgal(La1exo)-[32P](cid:173)
`SV40(Laiexo)-[12P](dA)so with
`(dT)so, followed by incubation with the enzymes, substrates,
`and cofactors needed for closure, produced a species of DNA
`(in about 15% yield) that sedimented rapidly in alkaline
`sucrose gradients (Fig. 5) and that formed a band in a CsCl(cid:173)
`ethidium. bromide gradient at the position expected for co(cid:173)
`valently closed DNA (Fig. 6). The putative Xdvgal-8V40
`circular DNA sediments just ahead of Adv-1, a supercoiled
`circular DNA marker [2.8 times the length of SV40(II)DNA],
`and behind Xdvgal supercoiled circles [4.1 times SV40(II)DNA]
`in the alkaline sucrose gradient. Electron microscopic measure(cid:173)
`ments of the DNA recovered from the dense band of the CsCl(cid:173)
`ethidium bromide gradient showed a mean contour length
`for the xnajor species of 2.95 ± 0.04 times that of SV40(II)
`DNA (Table 1). Each of these measurements supports the
`conclusion that the newly formed, covalently closed-circular
`DNA contains one SV40 DNA segment and one Xdvgal DNA
`monomeric segment.
`
`Omission of the enzymes from the reaction mixture pre(cid:173)
`vents Xdvgal-8V40 DNA forxnation (Figs. 5 and 6). No co(cid:173)
`valently closed product is detectable (Fig. 5) if Xdvgal and
`SV40 linear molecules with identical, rather than comple(cid:173)
`mentary, tails are annealed and incubated with the enzymes.
`This result demonstrates directly that the formation of co(cid:173)
`valently closed DNA depends on complementarity of the
`homopolymeric tails.
`We conclude from the experiments described above that
`Xdvgal DNA containing the intact galactose operon from E.
`coli, together with some phage X genes, has been covalently
`inserted into an SV 40 genome. These molecules should be
`useful for testing whether these bacterial genes can be intro(cid:173)
`duced into a xnamxnalian cell genome and whether they can
`be expressed there.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The methods described in this report for the covalent join(cid:173)
`ing of two SV40 molecules and for the insertion of a segment
`of DNA containing the galactose operon of E. coli into SV40
`are general and offer an approach for covalently joining any
`two DNA molecules together. With the exception of the for(cid:173)
`tuitous property of the R1 endonuclease, which creates con(cid:173)
`venient linear DNA precursors, none of the techniques used
`depends upon any unique property of SV40 and/or the Advgal
`DNA. By the use of known enzymes and only minor modi(cid:173)
`fications of the methods described here, it should be possible
`to join DNA molecules even if they have the wrong combina(cid:173)
`tion of hydroxyl and phosphoryl groups at their termini. By
`judicious use of generally available enzymes, even DNA
`duplexes with protruding 5'- or 3'-ends can be modified to
`become suitable substrates for the joining reaction.
`One important feature of this method, which is different
`from some other techniques that can be used to join unrelated
`DNA molecules to one another (16, 19), is that here the join(cid:173)
`ing is directed by the homopolymeric tails on the DNA. In
`our protocol, molecule A and molecule B can only be joined
`to each other; all AA and BB intermolecular joinings and all
`A and B intramolecular joinings (circularizations) are pre(cid:173)
`vented. The yield of the desired product is thus increased,
`and subsequent purification problems are greatly reduced.
`
`16
`16
`
`14
`
`12
`
`14
`
`12
`
`4
`"10
`b
`";;a
`§.
`"6
`~ 6
`4
`
`8
`
`2
`
`4
`
`2
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`I>
`5 0
`r:
`4{)
`3
`3~
`~
`
`2
`
`1
`
`FIG. 6. CsCl-ethidium bromide equilibrium centrifugations of
`joined [8H]SV40(LRrexo)-[ 31P](dA)8o and [3H]Advgal-1110(LRr(cid:173)
`exo)-[81P] (dT)so DNA. The samples were those referred to in
`Fig. 5. Line A, dA-ended SV40 linears, plus dT-ended Advgal-1110
`linears, plus (P+L+III) (11P, e; 3H, O); lineB, the same mixture
`without (P+L+III) (81P, &; 3H, .t.).
`
`BEQ 1006
`Page 5
`
`

`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69 (1972)
`
`Insertion of the Galactose Operon into SV40 DNA
`
`2909
`
`For some purposes, however, it may be desirable to insert
`Xdvgal or other DNA molecules at other specific, or even ran(cid:173)
`dom, locations in the SV40 genome. Other specific placements
`could be accomplished if other endonucleases could be found
`that cleave the SV40 circular DNA specifically. Since pan(cid:173)
`creatic DNase in the presence of Mn2+ produces randomly
`located, double-strand scissions (17) of SV40 circular DNA
`(Jackson and Berg, in preparation), it should be possible to
`insert a DNA segment at a large number of positions in the
`SV40 genome.
`Although the Xdvgal DNA segment is integrated at the same
`location in each SV40 DNA molecule, it should be emphasized
`that the orientation of the two DNA segments to each other
`is probably not identical. This follows from the fact that each
`of the two strands of a duplex can be joined to either of the two
`W,....W W,....C)§
`strands of the other duplex e.g., C._..C or C._..W
`. What
`(
`possible consequences this fact has on the genetic expression
`of these segments remains to be seen.
`We have no information concerning the biological activities
`of the SV40 dimer or the Xdvgal-SV40 DNAs, but appropri(cid:173)
`ate experiments are in progress. It is clear, however, that the
`location of the Rr break in the SV40 genome will be crucial
`in determining the biological potential of these molecules;
`preliminary evidence suggests that the break occurs in the
`late genes of SV40 (Morrow, Kelly, Berg, and Lewis, in prep(cid:173)
`aration.
`A further feature of these molecules that may bear on their
`usefulness is the (dA·dT)n tracts that join the two DNA seg(cid:173)
`ments. They could be helpful (as a physical or genetic marker)
`or a hindrance (by making the molecule more sensitive to
`degradation) for their potential use as a transducer.
`The Xdvgal-SV40 DNA produced in these experiments is,
`in effect, a trivalent biological reagent. It contains the genetic
`information to code for most of the functions of SV40, all of
`the functions of the E. coli galactose operon, and those func(cid:173)
`tions of the X bacteriophage required for autonomous repli(cid:173)
`cation of circular DNA molecules in E. coli. Each of these
`
`§ The symbols W and C refer to one or the other complementary
`strands of a DNA duplex, and the" connectors" indicate how the
`strands can be joined in the closed-circular duplex.
`
`sets of functions has a wide range of potential uses in studying
`the molecular biology of SV 40 and the mammalian cells with
`which this virus interacts.
`
`We are grateful to Peter Lobban for many helpful discussions.
`D. A. J. was a Basic Science Fellow of the National Cystic
`Fibrosis Research Foundation; R. H. S. was on study leave from
`the Department of Biochemistry, University of Adelaide, Aus(cid:173)
`tralia and was supported in part by a grant from the USPHS.
`This research was supported by Grant GM-13235 from the
`USPHS and Grant VC-23A from the American Cancer Society.
`
`7.
`
`I. Sambrook, J., Westphal, H., Srinivasan, P. R. & Dulbecco,
`R. (1968) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 60, 1288-1295.
`2. Dulbecco, R. (1969) Science 166, 962-968.
`3. Matsubara, K., & Kaiser, A. D. (1968) Cold Spring Harbor
`Symp. Quant. Biol. 33, 27-34.
`4. Radloff, R., Bauer, W., Vinograd, J. (1967) Proc. Nat. Acad.
`Sci. USA 57, 1514-1521.
`.5. Little, J. W., Lehman, I. R. & Kaiser, A. D. (1967) J. Biol.
`Chem. 242, 672-678.
`6. Kato, K., Goncalves, J. M., Houts, G. E., & Bollum, F. J.
`(1967) J. Biol. Chem. 242, 2780-2789.
`Jovin, T. M., Englund, P. T. & Kornberg, A. (1969) J. Bicl.
`Chem. 244, 2996-3008.
`8. Olivera, B. M., Hall, Z. W., Anraku, Y., Chien, J. R. &
`Lehman, I. R. (1968) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant.
`Biol. 33, 27-34.
`9. Richardson, C. C., Lehman, I. R. & Kornberg, A. {1964)
`J. Biol Chem. 239, 2.51-258.
`10. Symons, R. H. (1969) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 190, 548-
`.5.50.
`11. Davis, R., Simon, M. & Davidson, N. (1971) in Methods in
`Enzymology, eds. Grossman, L. & Moldave, K. (Academic
`Press, New York); Vol. 21, pp. 413-428.
`12. Chang, L. M. S. & Bollum, F. J. (1971) Biochemistry 10,
`.536-542.
`13. Sheldon, R., Jurale, C. & Kates, J. (1972) Proc. Nat. Acad.
`Sci. USA 69, 417-421.
`14. Richardson, C. C., Schildkraut, C. L. & Kornberg, A.
`(1963) ColdSpring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 28,9-19.
`15. Little, J. W. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. 242,679-686.
`16. Sgaramella, V., van de Sande, J. H. & Khorana, H. G.
`(1970) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 67, 1468-14.7.5.
`17. Melgar, E. & Goldthwait, D. A. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243,
`44.09-4416.
`18. Morrow, J. F. & Berg, P. (1972) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
`69, in press.
`19. Sgaramella, V. & Lobban, P. (1972) Nature, in press.
`
`BEQ 1006
`Page 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket