throbber
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`Volume646
`
`RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY I
`
`I (
`
`Edited by Ales Prokop and Rakesh K Bajpai
`
`The New York Academy of Sciences
`New York, New York
`1991
`
`/
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 1
`
`

`
`. ·.
`
`:
`
`-··
`
`Copyright c 1991l!y the New YorlcAcad~my of SCiences. All rights reserv~d. Under the proviswns of the United
`States Copynglil Act of 1976, individual readers .of the A,n.nals are peimitted to make fair use of the material in
`them for teaching and researi:h. Permiiswn is granJed to quote from _the_ Annals provided that the customary
`acknowledgment is made of the sourci. Materiol in the Annals may be republished only by permission of the
`Academy. Address inq~iries to the &ecutive Editor at the New York Academy of Scipu;es.
`Copying cee8: For eill:h copy_ ofan article made /;Jeyo!la t}Je free copyjng pdrmitted under Section 107 or 108 of
`the 1976 CofJY!ight Act, a fee should be paid through the Copyright Clearance Center Inc.~ _27 Coligrqs SL, Salem,
`MA 01970. For articles of mare than 3 page,s; the copying fee is·$1. 75.
`.
`.
`
`@ The paper used in this pubiication m«ts the minimum reJJ¢n!lll!!rUS of American N(Jtional SUJ11Jiard for
`Infortn_ation Sciences....:...Permanence of Paper for .Prilued Libr9ry 1,1aterjals, ANSI Z39.48-19IJ.!I.
`. ~
`.
`' .
`·.
`.
`
`.
`.
`library or Congress Cala'l_ogiog·itr·Publication l)ata
`..
`.
`.
`. .
`.
`. .
`Reco~bjnant bNA.t~.cbnology I / edited py Ale5 Prokol? and· Rakesh K..
`· BaJpat.
`.
`.
`.
`· · ,

`.

`:p , . em. --:--(Annal~ o( the New York Aeademy of Sciences, ISSN
`0077-8923; v. 646).
`. . .
`.
`.
`.
`. .ISBN 0-8976~-~73-9 (cloth: a1k.: paper).- ISBN.0-89766-674-7
`{pbk;.:'_alk. paper)
`.·
`.
`.
`· .
`. . .

`:
`· · · . - ·1: Genetic engineering. 2. RccombioantD~A. 1: Prokep, f\.le~.
`II. Bajpai, Rakesh K. III. Title: Reco~bin~t PJ:'lA tec~nology I. .
`·IY.' Title: R C}conibinant DNAtecb~ology one.: · V. Series. . ·
`·[DNLM: 1. BiotecQ.nol<>g}'--.;..congresses. 2. -pNA, Recbmbinant-
`-3. Genetic Engineering-congresses-; W l AN626YL v:
`·. oopgre.sSes.
`646 ! QU 58 R3124Pl
`.
`.
`Qll.NS' vol. 646 ·
`[TP248.6] ...
`500 5--'-dc20
`· r 600'_.6sf :
`·. · .·
`bNLMt:QLC
`for. Li!>raiy-of Congr~ss
`. .
`:
`...
`... (
`.. '
`
`. ·
`...
`
`..
`
`'
`
`.
`...
`. · . . . . ..
`
`. . _ .
`
`-- . ·.
`
`'
`
`..
`. ..
`
`. . ...
`
`·.
`
`. : ,. ..
`
`.. . .. - ~
`
`.
`
`..
`
`. ,,
`..... .
`
`..-.
`
`,. -
`
`·. : . .... . . , : .. : .
`. . ·.··
`..
`
`.
`·sp
`. .
`, ...
`'Printed in the Uiz.iied States. of ~tka . · · . . . ·
`·isBN ~66;-673.9 ( clo.tli). ·. . · · .. ::_·. ,:
`: ·:
`·· ·. . : I~BN o;s97664J7-a.? (gaper): :·
`.
`.
`ISSN.4"rZ7 ~89~ ·::
`. ·. ··
`
`.·· ... · .
`
`. .. .
`
`• • • ..
`
`.
`
`4.
`
`.·
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 2
`
`

`
`High Cell Density Fermentation of
`Recombinant Escherichia coli with
`Computer-Controlled Optimal
`Growth Rate
`
`W. A. KNORRE,0 W.-D. DECKWER,b D. KORZ,b
`H.-D. POHL,0 D. RIESENBERG,0 A. ROSS,b E. SANDERS,b
`AND V. SCHULZ0
`0 Zentralinstitut for Mikrobiologie und experimentelle 1herapie (ZIMET)
`0 6900 lena, 1huringen, Germany
`hGesellschaft fiir Biotechnologische Forschung mbH (GBF)
`W 3300 Braunschweig Niedersachsen, Germany
`
`In recent years interest in the production of recombinant DNA products, such as
`enzymes and pharmaceuticals, has been growing. High cell density cultivation has
`been one of the most effective ways to increase cell as well as product yield. Basic
`work in this field was carried out by Bauer and coworkers (1974-1981) with
`nonrecombinant strains of Escherichia coli. 1
`2
`•
`A variety of process strategies have been developed in fed-batch fermentation of
`E. coli. 3 Common goals are to control the oxygen demand within the oxygen transfer
`capabilities of the fermentor and to avoid the accumulation of acetate and ethanol.4
`These goals can be met by feeding the carbon source to achieve C-limited growth,
`reducing temperature to decrease the growth rate, or increasing the oxygen transfer
`capability of the fermentor using oxygen as the sparging gas. Cell densities of about
`110 g/L have been reported for a process-controlled fed-batch plus oxygen mode for
`cultivating nonrecombinant E. coli in a 2.5-L fermentor.5 An impressive application
`of rDNA products is the production of alpha-consensus interferon by recombinant
`E. coli. Fieschko and Ritch6 reported product concentrations of 5.5 g/L from 65 g/L
`cell dry mass.
`
`ADVANTAGES OF HIGH CELL DENSI1Y FERMENTATION
`
`In general, the main advantages of high-density cultivation are: reduced fermen(cid:173)
`tor and closed system volume, improved space time yield (volumetric productivity),
`reduced medium costs, reduced volume in primary downstream processing, frequent
`omission of concentration steps, and reduced plant and operating costs.
`
`HOST STRAIN E. COU
`
`For decades, E. coli has played an important role in molecular biological work,
`which explains its use as the host strain for the majority of protein productions from
`rDNA. For example, insulin, hGH, alpha2-interferon, alph~-interferon, and rennin
`300
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 1
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 3
`
`

`
`KNORRE et al.: IDGH CELL DENSI1Y FERMENTATION
`
`301
`
`are available from cultivations of recombinant E. coli. For none of them has a high
`cell density process been used.
`Of great interest is the control of growth rate because it strongly influences the
`formation of both products and inhibitory metabolites. Acetate formation is re(cid:173)
`ported to increase drastically when the growth rate exceeds 0.35 h- 1 (defined
`medium) and 0.2 h- 1 (complex medium). 7
`Seo and Bailey8 showed the existence of an optimum dilution rate (growth rate)
`for 13-lactamase production in continuous cultivation. This finding was not confirmed
`in batch experiments when growth rate control was changed by altering growth
`medium. Despite this, Riesenberg et a/. 9 reported an optimum growth rate in batch
`production of alpha,-interferon.9
`
`I SPECIFIC
`I GROWTH
`RATE
`
`ITU£
`I
`I
`
`I I
`I I
`I I
`I I,
`1 I
`I I
`I I
`I
`
`STIRRER SPEED
`
`0
`
`FIGURE 1. Scheme of the ZIMET HDF 30/450: t, = end of lag-phase; t2 = start of p02-control
`via stirrer speed; t3 = exhaustion of glycerol; t4 = start of glucose feeding; t5 = start of
`exponential shift in stirrer speed; and t6 = end of exponential shift in stirrer speed.
`
`ZIMET IDGH CELL DENSI'IY FERMENTATION 30/450
`
`In the ZIMET a high cell density fermentation (HDF) process for a glucose/
`mineral salt medium allows growth of a recombinant E. coli strain (TG 1, pBB 210)
`up to a cell density of 60 g/L in a 30- and 450-L Chemap fermentor. 9 Except for the
`feeding of glucose as a carbon source and of aqueous ammonia for pH control, there
`was no need for the feeding of other nutrients and for the supply of oxygen-enriched
`air. FIGURE 1 schematically illustrates this process with a batch phase with glucose
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 2
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 4
`
`

`
`302
`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`
`consumption and a feed-batch phase with glucose feeding. In the fed-batch phase the
`p02 was kept at 20% of saturation via closed-loop controls with two variables,
`namely, stirrer speed and feeding rate of glucose. The fed-batch mode prevented
`significant accumulation of acetate and other metabolic byproducts. The recombi(cid:173)
`nant E. coli expressed alpha1-interferon constitutively with a higher efficiency at a
`lower specific growth rate(~,= 0.17 h- 1
`) than at the maximal specific growth rate
`(ltmu = 0.45 h-') (FIG. 2). Therefore, after reaching a suitable cell density with
`growth at ltmu• the culture was forced to grow at the optimal specific growth rate, It .,
`by open-loop control for agitation directing the input of oxygen and hence the sup.Pfy
`of glucose. The stirrer speed was increased according to an e-function profile.
`
`ZIMET/GBF-HIGH CELL DENSITY FERMENTATION 70/1500
`
`To overcome the well-known disadvantages of high density processes, GBF and
`ZIMET in 1989 developed a special HDF process for E. coli that produces more than
`
`CH£HAP 30
`
`lUll
`toto
`
`INTERfERON ALPHA 1
`
`100
`
`x.s
`
`g/l
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`so
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`0
`
`4
`
`8
`
`12
`
`16
`
`20
`
`24 h
`
`FERIEHTATI<Jf Til£
`
`FIGURE 2. ZIMET HDF 30 process: Kinetics of glucose, biomass, and alpha1-interferon.
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 3
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 5
`
`

`
`KNORRE et aL: HIGH CELL DENSI1Y FERMENTATION
`
`303
`
`BATCH
`
`FED-BATCH
`PHASE 1
`
`PHASE 2
`
`log BI<J4ASS X..x
`
`116 g/1
`
`100
`~
`p02
`
`50
`
`0
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`fEIMNT A TI lW TI 1£
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30 h
`
`FIGURE J. ZIMET /GBF HDF process. Kinetics of biomass, glucose, and p02 in the 70-L pilot
`fermentor.
`
`100 g/L cell dry mass. The special cultivation strategy prevents oxygen limitation and
`hence the accumulation of inhibitory metabolites such as acetate and ethanol. (See
`FIG. 5 for acetate kinetics.)
`FIGURE 3 shows a typical time course of the HDF process with two exponential
`growth phases. The first is characterized as a batch phase under maximum growth
`rate corresponding to the media and process parameter, that is, temperature and pH.
`The subsequent fed-batch operation can be subdivided into IJ.-controlled phase 1,
`implemented as a dissolved oxygen control loop via nutrient feed and a J.L control
`loop via agitation rate, and a second period (phase 2) with decreasing growth rate at
`the maximum attainable oxygen transfer rate.
`In the example shown, growth rate was switched from IJ.max .,. 0.45 h- 1 after 12
`hours to a lower constant value of IJ. .,. 0.11 h-', which corresponded to an optimal
`growth rate for rONA product formation. Over more than 18 hours, respectively, of
`three doublings of biomass (12-95 g/L), growth rate was kept constant (FIG. 4).
`The special advantages of the ZIMET/GBF HDF process (FIG. 5) include:
`defined nutrient medium without turbidity; the simple composition of the one-feed
`medium; a lowered risk of contamination; aeration with air instead of oxygen; if
`desired, N, P or other limitations are possible; a controlled growth rate over a long
`period of time; a low concentration of inhibitory metabolites; and no pep tides from
`medium components in downstream processing.
`In contrast to the work of Seo and Bailey,8 it is possible to study product
`formation and plasmid content of the cells at different growth rates without changing
`the medium. This enables the researchers to determine the optimum growth rate in
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 4
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 6
`
`

`
`304
`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`
`0
`N
`
`-N
`.., -~
`~
`~
`<
`"'
`s
`
`'N
`0
`
`~
`
`.r:::
`
`~ :::: en
`
`~ .... ...
`~
`.....
`l:f ,_
`~
`"'
`
`•
`
`t!!
`~
`""
`::1:
`~~ <:>
`•
`~ ........
`~"'
`
`(J
`
`N -
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30 h
`
`f"ERKNTATION Til£
`
`FIGURE 4. ZIMET /GBF HDF process. Kinetics of oxygen uptake and concentration in the
`exhaust gas. Time course of the specific growth rate.
`
`batch experiments instead of the chemostat operation which may lead to conclusions
`that are not always easily applicable to subsequent batch cultivations.
`
`SCALE-UP
`
`Process development was carried out in a three-stage bioreactor cascade of 70,
`300, and 1,500 L. The reactors are equipped with multichannel control microcomput(cid:173)
`ers (MICON P200) that act as standard controllers for basic parameters such as
`temperature, pH, gas flow, and pressure. Furthermore, a second P200 calculates the
`actual growth rate from exhaust gas analysis and controls it by appropriate alteration
`of the oxygen transfer to the culture.
`Any operation of the user such as input of setpoints and switching between
`cultivation phases and therefore different modes of the controllers can be performed
`at a terminal connected to a process computer, which provides for data transfer
`between P200 microcomputers, exhaust gas analysis, and host computer link.
`With data from the 70-L cultivation experiments it was no problem to scale-up
`the process to 1,500 L. The only critical problem that arose with increasing scale was
`the removal of heat.
`
`SCALE-DOWN
`
`Further investigations on HDF and its applications on rONA protein production
`are under way. Actually, variations of HDF are being analyzed and appropriate
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 5
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 7
`
`

`
`KNORRE et al.: HIGH CELL DENSflY FERMENTATION
`
`305
`
`host/vector systems are being prepared. This work can be carried out in laboratory
`scale fermentors, so that scale-down to 5-L working volume was performed in an
`early phase of process development. The major difference from the original scale
`( ~ 70 L) HDF is operation at atmospheric pressure with the use of glass fermentors.
`In this case the only way to ensure sufficient oxygen transfer into the broth is to
`aerate with oxygen-enriched air.
`In 5-L scale a slightly modified HDF process was successfully applied to produc(cid:173)
`tion of recombinant ~-galactosidase using a chemically inducible system. Specific
`activities (U I g) obtained in standard cultivations were also achieved under dense
`cultivation conditions at a cell mass 10-50 times higher, that is, up to 50 times higher
`volumetric activity.
`
`FUTURE PROSPECTS
`
`In the last decade, most scientific attention has focused on genetics-based
`solutions to productivity issues, and progress has been impressive. Ultimately, the
`returns from a purely genetics approach will diminish, and further optimization will
`depend on understanding the relationship between the microbial environment and
`synthesis of the desired protein. More recently, Pliickthun 10 reported an expression
`system with which fully functional antibody F. or F.b fragments can be expressed in E.
`coli. Both chains are co-expressed and co-secreted into the periplasm of E. coli with
`correct signal processing, disulfide formation, and chain association. Such expression
`systems should also be suitable for other similar proteins. Therefore, it is necessary
`
`x.nax = 116 g/1
`
`0
`
`"' 0
`
`""'
`.....
`< .....
`~
`
`0 ....,
`
`~
`
`iii
`
`o,
`
`0
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30h
`
`FERMENTATION TIME
`
`FIGURE 5. ZIMET /GBF HDF process. Typical time course of biomass and acetate.
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 6
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 8
`
`

`
`306
`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`
`to develop HDF processes for E. coli with such an expression system and to optimize
`the accumulated periplasmatic proteins.
`The research and commercial forces that are guiding the development of
`recombinant DNA technology will certainly motivate the growing effort in HDF
`process research devoted to recombinant microorganisms, especially as products
`move from research into development.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`In recent years recombinant DNA technology has enabled us to produce various
`proteins of therapeutic importance with microorganisms. As an appropriate host
`organism, E. coli plays a dominant role. Yields of E. coli dry cell mass in shaker flask
`culture range from 1-2 g/L, whereas in fermentors up to 10 g dry cells/L can be
`achieved. ZIMET and GBF have developed a high cell density fermentation process
`that produces E. coli (on a glucose/mineral salt medium) up to more than 100 g dry
`cells/L in a special fed-batch mode. This cultivation strategy prevents oxygen
`limitation and hence the accumulation of acetate and other metabolic byproducts.
`The specific growth rate can be adjusted so that product formation reaches its
`optimum value. An example of the production of alpha1- interferon is presented. The
`high cell density fermentations were realized in 30- and 450-L Chemap fermentors
`(ZIMET) and in a three-stage bioreactor scale-up system (72, 300, and 1,500 L)
`developed in cooperation with GBF and B. Braun Melsungen AG. Multiloop
`controllers were used to control the process variables.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. BAUER, S. & J. SHILOACH. 1974. Maximal exponential growth rate and yield of E. coli
`obtainable in a bench-scale fermentor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 16:933-941.
`2. GLEISER, I. E. & S. BAUER. 1981. Growth of E. coli W to high cell concentration by oxygen
`level linked control of carbon source concentration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23: 1015-1021.
`3. ZABRISKIE, D. W. & E. J. ARCURI. 1986. Factors influencing productivity of fermentations
`employing recombinant microorganisms. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 8: 706-717.
`4. PAN, J. G., J. S. RHEE & J. M. LEBEAULT. 1984. Physiological constraints in increasing
`biomass concentration of E. coli B in fed batch culture. Biotechnol. Lett. 9: 89-94.
`5. EPPSTEIN, L., J. SHEVf1Z, X.-M. YANG & S. WEISS. 1989. Increased biomass production in
`a benchtop fermentor. Bio/Technology 7: 1178-1181.
`6. FIESCHKO, J. & T. RITCH. 1986. Production of human alpha consensus interferon in
`recombinant E. coli. Chern. Eng. Commun. 4S: 229-240.
`7. MEYER, H.-P., C. LEIST & A. FIECHTER. 1984. Acetate formation in continuous culture of
`E. coli Kl2 D1 on defined and complex media. J. Biotechnol. 1: 355-358.
`8. SEo, J.-H. & J. E. BAILEY. 1986. Continuous cultivation of recombinant E. coli: Existence
`of an optimum dilution rate for maximum plasmid and gene product concentration.
`Biotechnol. Bioeng. 28: 1590-1594.
`9. RIESENBERG, D., K MENZEL, V. SCHULZ, K. SCHUMANN, G. VEITH, G. ZUBER & W. A.
`KNoRRE. 1991. High-cell-density-fermentation of recombinant E. coli expressing hu(cid:173)
`man interferon alpha-1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34:77--82.
`10. PLiJC.tCTHUN, A. 1990. Recombinant antigen binding fragment of an antibody expressed in
`E. coli: folding in vivo, properties and catalytic activity. E ngineering Foundation
`Conference: Progress in Recombinant DNA Technology and Application. June 3-8,
`Potosi, Missouri.
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 7
`
`BEQ 1005
`Page 9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket