`Inter Partes Review ofInter Partes Review of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,581,710: IPR2016-01603U.S. Patent No. 8,581,710: IPR2016-01603
`
`
`Apple Inc. (Petitioner)Apple Inc. (Petitioner)
`
`v. v.
`
`Immersion Corporation (Patent Owner)Immersion Corporation (Patent Owner)
`
`
`Petitioner’s DemonstrativesPetitioner’s Demonstratives
`
`Oral Hearing: November 16, 2017Oral Hearing: November 16, 2017
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 1
`
`
`
`Two Instituted Grounds
`
`
`
`Institution DecisionInstitution Decision
`
`Institution Decision at 39.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 2
`
`
`
`’710 Patent Instituted Claims: 1, 7-10, 12
`
`’710 patent, claim 1 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petition at 12-23; Reply at 4-20.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 3
`
`
`
`“otherwise” Limitation
`
`’710 patent, claim 1 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petition at 12-23; Reply at 4-20.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 4
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at Fig. 8, 15:52-55 (Ex. 1004); see also 13:28-31, 14:17-21.
`
`Petition at 10-11, 17-19; Reply at 8.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 5
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Petition at 11, 17-19; Reply at 8-9.
`
`Martin at Fig. 8, 14:22-28 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 6
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`Martin at Fig. 9 (Ex. 1004); see also 14:28-32.
`
`Petition at 11, 17-19; Reply at 9.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 7
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at Fig. 8, 15:52-55 (Ex. 1004); see also 13:28-31, 14:17-21.
`
`Petition at 19-20; Reply at 9.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 8
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at Fig. 8, 16:3-10 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petition at 22; Reply at 9.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 9
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at Fig. 9, 16:10-14 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petition at 22; Reply at 9.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 10
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`If the user input is
`recognized and
`the command is
`determined
`
`otherwise
`
`Petition at 19-20, 22; Reply at 9-10.
`
`Martin, Fig. 8 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 11
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• PO’s expert confirms that Martin teaches a binary logic structure.
`
`
`
`Dr. VisellDr. Visell
`
`* * * *
`
`Reply at 10-11.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 12
`
`Ex. 1020 at 1426:16-1427:8; see also Ex. 1019 at 46:13-48:2, 41:3-6; 38:7-15.
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• PO incorrectly contends that Function Failure is an alternative path.
`
`Reply at 14-18.
`
`Martin at Fig. 9 (Ex. 1004); see also 17:64-18:16.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 13
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`Function Failure effect is generated if the
`function associated with the user input fails.
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at Fig. 8, 18:11-16 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Reply at 15-16.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 14
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`If the user input is
`recognized and
`the command is
`determined
`
`otherwise
`
`Reply at 15-16, 8-10.
`
`Martin at Fig. 8 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 15
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• PO argues that Function Failure cannot be a first haptic effect.
`• But, the claimed “first haptic effect” is not limited to one effect.
`
`
`
`Claim 1Claim 1
`
`Reply at 17-18.
`
`’710 patent, claim 1 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 16
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• The ’710 patent contemplates different “first haptic effects.”
`• Claim 12 requires that “the first haptic effect” provide information
`associated with the status of the operation.
`
`’710 patent, claim 12 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Reply at 18.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 17
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• The ’710 patent describes haptic effects providing various status
`information.
`
`
`
`’710 Patent’710 Patent
`
`’710 patent at 5:46-54 (Ex. 1001).
`• Multiple haptic effects must be possible to provide these types of status
`information.
`
`Reply at 18.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 18
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• PO’s alleged “multiple alternative paths” rely on irrelevant SEARCH and
`rocker switch embodiments.
`
`MartinMartin
`
`* * * *
`
`* * * *
`
`Martin at 14:43-44, 15:30-34, 15:52-55 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Reply at 12-13.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 19
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• The Petition relied on the “input device 7” embodiment.
`
`
`
`PetitionPetition
`
`Petition at 19.
`
`Reply at 12-13.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 20
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• The SEARCH embodiment is irrelevant.
`
`Reply at 12-13.
`
`Martin at Fig. 9 (Ex. 1004); see also 15:30-34, 15:52-55.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 21
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• Providing no haptic effect when there is no user input is not an alternative
`path.
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2004 at 100:8-18.
`
`Reply at 18-19.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 22
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`If the user input is
`recognized and
`the command is
`determined
`
`otherwise
`
`Reply at 15-16.
`
`Martin, Fig. 8 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 23
`
`
`
`Claim 8
`
`’710 patent, claim 8 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petition at 25-27.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 24
`
`
`
`“haptic effect configured to emulate the command”
`
`
`
`AppleApple
`
`a haptic effect in the form of a short
`vibration should be found to emulate a
`command to display a menu
`
`
`
`ImmersionImmersion
`
`No construction offered.
`
`Petition at 8-9; Reply at 3-4.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 25
`
`
`
`Martin Renders Obvious Claim 8
`
`• Martin likewise discloses generating a pop effect when displaying a menu.
`
`MartinMartin
`
`* * * *
`
`Martin at 16:33-35, 18:33-36 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petition at 26; Reply at 20-21.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 26
`
`
`
`Martin Renders Obvious Claim 8
`
`• Martin also discloses pop effects that emulate the command of selecting a
`menu option.
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at 18:30-37 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petition at 26-27; Reply at 21.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 27
`
`
`
`Claim 12
`
`’710 patent, claim 12 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petition at 28-29; Reply at 22-24.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 28
`
`
`
`Martin Renders Obvious Claim 12
`
`Function Failure effect is generated if the
`function associated with the user input fails.
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at Fig. 8, 18:11-16 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petition at 29; Reply at 22-23.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 29
`
`
`
`Martin Renders Obvious Claim 12
`
`• The ’710 patent likewise describes haptic effects providing status
`information about the failure of an operation.
`
`
`
`’710 Patent’710 Patent
`
`’710 patent at 5:46-54 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petition at 29; Reply at 23.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 30
`
`
`
`Martin Renders Obvious Claim 12
`
`• PO assumes that a haptic effect can indicate the status of an operation only
`after the operation has begun.
`• But, claim 12 does not include such a limitation.
`• And, the ’710 contemplates providing status information before an operation.
`
`
`
`’710 Patent’710 Patent
`
`’710 patent, 5:23-27 (Ex. 1001); see also 5:50-54.
`
`Reply at 23.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 31
`
`
`
`ADDITIONAL SLIDES
`
`ADDITIONAL SLIDES
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 32
`i ioner Apple Inc. — 32
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• Regardless, SEARCH is a function of the device.
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at 15:35-45 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Reply at 13-14.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 33
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`• The rocker switch embodiment is likewise irrelevant.
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at 16:59-62 (Exhibit 1004).
`
`• The rocker switch is not even an input device depicted in Fig. 9.
`
`Reply at 17.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 34
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`MartinMartin
`
`Martin at Fig. 7, 13:50-54 (Ex. 1004).
`
`Petition at 10; Reply at 13-14.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 35
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 3143:16-315:1; see also 319:2-23; 315:9-317:10.
`
`Response to Observation #2.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 36
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 381:20-382:6; see also 379:22-381:19.
`
`Response to Observation #3.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 37
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 328:6-16; see also 325:16-326:5.
`
`Response to Observation #4.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 38
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Response to Observation #5.
`
`Ex. 2010 at 331:4-16.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 39
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 332:2-12.
`
`Response to Observation #5.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 40
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Response to Observation #6.
`
`Ex. 2010 at 350:7-20.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 41
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 232:4-9.
`
`Response to Observation #7-8.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 42
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 397:11-398:2; see also 255:10-25.
`
`Response to Observation #9-13.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 43
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 304:13-17; see also 305:11-21, 306:13-21, 308:9-19
`
`Response to Observation #14.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 44
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Response to Observation #14.
`
`* * * *
`Ex. 2010 at 303:12-25.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 45
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 390:3-12.
`
`Response to Observation #15.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 46
`
`
`
`Martin Discloses the “otherwise” Limitation
`
`
`
`Dr. GivargisDr. Givargis
`
`Ex. 2010 at 370:24:371:8; see also 370:15-23, 371:10-24.
`
`Response to Observation #16.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 47
`
`
`
`“haptic effect configured to emulate the command”
`
`Petition at 8-9; Reply at 3-4.
`
`’710 patent, claims 1, 8 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 48
`
`
`
`“haptic effect configured to emulate the command”
`
`
`
`Immersion Infringement ContentionsImmersion Infringement Contentions
`
`* * * *
`
`Petition at 8-9; Reply at 3-4.
`
`Ex. 1011 at 33-34, 37.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 49
`
`
`
`“haptic effect configured to emulate the command”
`
`
`
`Immersion Infringement ContentionsImmersion Infringement Contentions
`
`* * * *
`
`Ex. 1011 at 39-40.
`
`Petition at 8-9; Reply at 3-4.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 50
`
`
`
`“haptic effect configured to emulate the command”
`
`
`
`’710 Patent’710 Patent
`
`’710 patent at 12:7-19 (Ex. 1001).
`
`Petition at 5.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – 51
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
