throbber
Issues
`
`Topics
`
`Awards
`
`Resources
`
`News
`
`Market News
`
`Log In
`
`Register
`
`Tools
`

`Order Reprints or
`Eprints
`
`Download article
`as PDF
`
`Melissa
`Leonhauser
`
`Melissa Leonhauser is
`Senior Manager,
`Marketing
`Communications, at
`IMS Health.
`Email Melissa
`Leonhauser
`
`Author Articles
`The Asthma Market:
`Unique Opportunities
`for Innovation
`
`Overactive Bladder
`Market: Managing the
`Future
`
`Market Watch:
`Managed-care
`Coverage Still at the
`Heart of
`Cardiovascular Market
`
`Overactive Bladder
`Market: Managing the
`Future
`
`Market Watch by Melissa Leonhauser on April 1st, 2012
`
`Because of memorable direct-to-consumer advertising campaigns, including the
`“Gotta Go” Detrol campaign that became part of American pop culture, many
`adults have some familiarity with overactive bladder (OAB) and its treatments.
`Brands that treat OAB face common issues, including patients’ reluctance to
`visit their physician, non-drug treatment options, generic competition, and
`inconsistent efficacy. But even with these challenges, some manufacturers,
`particularly Pfizer and Astellas, have chosen to extend their presence in the
`market.
`
`TREATMENTS
`
`Experts believe that OAB is under-diagnosed, although estimates of prevalence
`vary. Common belief is that patients with OAB, which is characterized by
`sudden, strong urges to urinate, may be embarrassed to see a physician about
`their condition or believe that its symptoms are a natural result of aging. When
`patients do visit their physicians, they’re able to discuss a number of treatment
`options. Prior to prescribing a drug, physicians may first recommend physical or
`behavioral therapy or lifestyle modifications.
`
`There are a number of OAB medications available, most of which are branded.
`Oxybutynin chloride and oxybutynin chloride ER, generic versions of Ditropan
`and Ditropan XL, are the only generics currently competing in the market.
`However, more generics soon will arrive, as Detrol is expected to lose patent
`protection later this year.
`
`In the 12 months ending January 2012, more than 17.8 million prescriptions
`were filled for drugs in the market, accounting for almost $2.1 billion in sales.
`Astellas’ VESIcare, which was promoted jointly with GlaxoSmithKline, led the
`market with 3.8 million prescriptions. Oxybutynin chloride and oxybutynin
`chloride ER followed closely with 3.7 million and 3.6 million prescriptions,
`respectively. Pfizer’s Detrol LA, which previously led the market, ranked fourth
`in total prescriptions with 3.3 million. Warner Chilcott’s Enablex and Pfizer’s
`Toviaz followed with 1.6 million and approximately 712,000 prescriptions,
`
`Previous Article
`
`Next Article
`
`Subscribe to PM360
`
`Like a team of experts in your inbox
`
`Experts on Call
`
`Blake Shewey
`Authentic Patient Voice
`
`E.M. (Mick) Kolassa, PhD
`Pricing and Reimbursement
`
`John Weinman, PhD
`Health Psychology
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1023 - Page 1
`
`

`
`Jay Bolling
`Customer Experience (CX) Marketing
`
`Mark Heinold
`EMR Connections
`
`Erik Dalton
`Customized Physician Education
`
`Marc Sirockman
`Interactive Education
`
`Richard Meyer
`DTC Marketing
`
`Dr. Theodore F. Search, PharmD
`Specialized Online Medical
`Communities
`
`Bud Bilanich
`Common Sense
`
`Jim McDonough
`Multichannel Engagement
`
`Chris Dowd
`Patient Loyalty
`
`respectively.
`
`Market share for VESIcare and the two generics has been increasing and will
`continue to do so because they are the drugs most often prescribed to new-to-
`market patients and those switching treatments. This dynamic market segment,
`which represented 15% of prescriptions in January 2012, is a brand’s greatest
`growth opportunity (figure 1). Among new patient prescriptions, oxybutynin and
`VESIcare led with 27% and 24%, respectively.
`
`PFIZER’S SHIFT
`
`VESIcare, however, hasn’t always been the leading brand. As recently as April
`2011, Detrol LA led the market in total prescriptions (figure 2). Detrol LA has
`dominated the market for years, but the brand’s prescriptions began to decline
`in mid-2009 and continued to decrease thereafter. So what happened in 2009
`that changed Detrol LA’s trajectory? Pfizer launched Toviaz and shifted all
`promotion away from Detrol LA in favor of the new brand. Toviaz, which
`became available in March 2009, isn’t considered a true line extension but is
`structurally similar to Detrol and Detrol LA.
`
`Pfizer’s promotional shift from supporting Detrol LA to Toviaz wasn’t novel. In
`fact, many companies have done the same when launching a line extension. It
`wouldn’t even be worth highlighting had Toviaz grown rapidly and replaced
`much or all of Detrol LA’s original share of the market. But Toviaz’s monthly
`market share has not come close to mimicking Detrol LA’s success. In January
`2012, Toviaz accounted for only 4% of prescriptions in the market.
`
`Although Toviaz’s performance has been questionable, Pfizer hasn’t given up.
`At the end of 2011, Pfizer reported positive top-line results of a recent study
`for Toviaz and continues to promote the drug heavily. In the 12 months ending
`November 2011, over $252 million was spent promoting the brand, accounting
`for 38% of promotional spending in the market (figure 3).
`
`ASTELLAS’ FUTURE
`
`VESIcare is currently the leading OAB brand and isn’t expected to lose patent
`protection until 2018. VESIcare has been supported with significant promotion,
`accounting for 45% of promotional spending in the OAB market during the 12
`months ending November 2011. VESIcare has been promoted by a much larger
`field force than competitors, but that may change as GlaxoSmithKline is no
`longer marketing the brand.
`
`Moving forward, VESIcare might not be the only OAB product offered by
`Astellas. In August 2011, Astellas submitted a New Drug Application to the U.S.
`Food & Drug Administration for mirabegron. If approved, mirabegron will be a
`first in class treatment for OAB—one with a different mode of action than the
`currently available medications.
`
`With two drugs in the same market, Astellas will face a situation similar to what
`Pfizer encountered in 2009, although with some significant differences.
`VESIcare is the current leader among brands, but its dominance is not nearly
`as significant as Detrol LA’s was when Toviaz was introduced. In addition, as
`mirabegron will offer a different mode of action than VESIcare, it will not be
`viewed as a line extension.
`
`Knowing the risk of pulling back promotion, it will be interesting to see how
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1023 - Page 2
`
`

`
`Astellas chooses to handle marketing VESIcare if mirabegron is approved. It
`may choose, as Pfizer did, to pull back promotion for VESIcare completely so
`its field force can concentrate on a strong launch. Or, if it has the resources, it
`may choose to market both. If Astellas does market both, it’ll need to message
`each in a way that doesn’t negatively affect the other, by possibly positioning
`them for different patient segments.
`
`The OAB market’s future with the potential launch of mirabegron, introduction
`of generic Detrol, and Pfizer’s continued investment in Toviaz is sure to be one
`of much fluctuation.
`
`FIGURE 1:
`
`FIGURE 2:
`
`FIGURE 3:
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1023 - Page 3
`
`

`
`0 comments
`
`
`Get Livefyre
`FAQ
`
`Sign in
`
`+ Follow
`Post comment
`
`Newest | Oldest
`
`LifeStyle
`
`Previous Article
`
`Movers & Shakers
`
`Next Article
`
`Subscribe Today
`
`Like a team of experts in your inbox
`
`2015 Awards
`
`Submit work and get tickets
`
`Links
`
`About PM360
`
`Links
`
`Reprints
`
`Editorial Advisory Board
`
`PM360 Media Kit
`
`Contact PM360
`
`Press Releases
`
`PM360 Editorial Calendar
`
`Article Submission Information
`
`Privacy Policy and Terms of Service
`
`Internships
`
`PM
`ma
`ph
`de
`PM
`de
`inf
`ma
`pr
`he
`
`©2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1023 - Page 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket