throbber
0 Pharmacology & Toxicology 1997, 81, 169-172
`Printed in Denmark . AN rights reserved
`
`Copyright 0
`
`ISSN 0901-9928
`
`Antimuscarinic Potency and Bladder Selectivity of
`PNU-200577, a Major Metabolite of Tolterodine
`
`Lisbeth Nilvebrant’, Per-Goran Gillberg’ and Bengt Spa&
`‘Medical Department Urology and *Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacia & Upjohn AB, Uppsala, Sweden
`(Received December 4, 1996; Accepted April 24, 1997)
`
`Abstract: PNU-200577 (labcode DD 01 [(R)-N,N-diisopropyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethylphenyl)-3-phenylpropanami-
`ne) is a major pharmacologically active metabolite of tolterodine, a new muscarinic receptor antagonist intended for the
`treatment of an overactive bladder. In virro, PNU-200577 produced a competitive and concentration-dependent inhibition
`of carbachol-induced contraction of guinea-pig isolated urinary bladder strips (KB=0.84 nM; pAz=9. 14). In vivo, PNU-
`200577 was significantly more potent at inhibiting acetylcholine-induced urinary bladder contraction than electrically
`induced salivation in the anaesthetised cat (IDSo 15 and 40 nmol . kg-l, respectively; P<O.Ol). In radioligand binding
`studies carried out in homogenates of guinea-pig tissues and Chinese hamster ovary cell lines expressing human muscarinic
`ml-m5 receptors, PNU-200577 was not selective for any muscarinic receptor subtype. Thus, PNU-200577 is similar to
`tolterodine in terms of antimuscarinic potency, functional selectivity for the urinary bladder in vivo and absence of selec-
`tivity for muscarinic receptor subtypes in vitro. The results of this study clearly indicate that PNU-200577 contributes to
`the therapeutic action of tolterodine, in view of its high antimuscarinlc potency, similar serum concentration and lower
`degree of protein binding.
`
`Contraction of the human urinary bladder is known to be
`mediated predominantly through stimulation of muscarinic
`receptors (Anderson 1993) and, thus, the pharmacological
`treatment of urinary urge incontinence is based on muscar-
`inic receptor antagonists (Anderson 1988; Wein et al.
`1994). Tolterodine is a new, potent competitive muscarinic
`receptor antagonist that has been developed for the treat-
`ment of urinary urge incontinence and other symptoms re-
`lated to an overactive bladder. In vitro, tolterodine exhibits
`a high affinity and specificity for muscarinic receptors (Nil-
`vebrant et al. 1994 & 1996). In human isolated urinary
`bladder preparations tolterodine potently antagonises con-
`tractions induced by either carbachol or electrical stimula-
`tion (Naerger et al. 1995; Nilvebrant et al. 1995). In vivo, a
`selectivity of tolterodine for the urinary bladder over sali-
`vary glands has been demonstrated in the anaesthetised cat
`(Gillberg et al. 1994; Nilvebrant et al. 1996). At least 5 genes
`encoding for molecularly distinct subtypes of muscarinic re-
`ceptors (ml-m5) have been cloned and expressed in cell
`lines and 3 of these subtypes can be distinguished pharma-
`cologically (M,-M3) (Caulfield 1993; Hulme et al. 1990).
`However, the selectivity profile of tolterodine in vivo cannot
`be explained in terms of selectivity for one of these muscar-
`inic receptor subtypes (Nilvebrant et al. 1996).
`Metabolism studies in humans have revealed that toltero-
`dine undergoes oxidation via cytochrome P450 2D6 to a 5-
`hydroxymethyl derivative, PNU-200577 (labcode DD 01
`[(R)-N,N-diisopropyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethylphen-
`
`Author for correspondence: Lisbeth Nilvebrant, Medical Depart-
`ment Urology, Pharmacia & Upjohn AB, s-752 81 Uppsala,
`Sweden (fax +46 18 166464).
`
`yl)-3-phenylpropanamine) (Anderson et al. 1995; Postlind
`et al. 1996). PNU-200577 has been synthesised and found
`to be pharmacologically active in preliminary experiments.
`While serum levels of the metabolite in humans are gener-
`ally comparable to those of tolterodine following oral ad-
`ministration of the parent compound (unpublished obser-
`vations), tolterodine and PNU-200577 differ in terms of the
`extent of protein binding. In human and cat serum, PNU-
`200577 exists as >30% unbound drug while tolterodine is
`>95% protein bound (unpublished observations). Taken to-
`gether, these data suggest that PNU-200577 contributes to
`the therapeutic action of tolterodine. Thus, the aim of this
`study was to determine the pharmacological profile of
`PNU-200577 both in vitro and in vivo. For comparative pur-
`poses, previously published data on tolterodine (Nilvebrant
`et al. 1994 & 1996) are included.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Functional in vitro studies. Male guinea-pigs (Dunkin Hartley
`strain) weighing 300-500 g were used in all experiments. Antimus-
`carinic potency of PNU-200577 was determined in guinea-pig iso-
`lated urinary bladder strips, as previously described (Nilvebrant et
`al. 1996). Following equilibration, the urinary bladder preparations
`were repeatedly exposed to a standard concentration of the muscar-
`inic receptor agonist carbachol (3 pM; ECso). A reproducible con-
`trol response was established before the effects of PNU-200577 were
`determined. Following the generation of a cumulative concen-
`tration-response curve to carbachol (control), PNU-200577 was
`added to the tissue bath for 60 min. (Nilvebrant 1986) and a second
`cumulative concentration-response curve to carbachol generated in
`the presence of PNU-200577. The effect of PNU-200577 was
`studied at 4 5 different concentrations using separate tissue prep-
`arations. Responses were expressed as a percentage of the maximal
`contractile response elicited by carbachol in the control curve.
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1015 - Page 1
`
`

`
`170
`
`LISBETH NILVEBRANT ET AL.
`
`Radioligand binding studies. The affinity of PNU-200577 for mus-
`carinic receptors was determined by radioligand binding studies in
`homogenates of guinea-pig tissues (urinary bladder, parotid gland,
`heart and cerebral cortex) and in Chinese hamster ovary cells ex-
`pressing the human muscarinic receptor subtypes (ml-m5). Briefly,
`tissue homogenates were incubated at 25" with the radioligand 1-
`quinuclidinyl [phenyl-4
`benzilate [( -)3H-QNB] and different
`concentrations of unlabelled antagonist under conditions of equilib-
`rium: urinary bladder, 60 min. (Nilvebrant & Sparf 1983a); parotid
`gland, 210 min. (Nilvebrant & Sparf 1982); and heart and cerebral
`cortex, 80 min. (Nilvebrant & Sparf 1986). Incubations were ter-
`minated by centrifugation. The pellets were washed three times with
`buffer before radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation
`spectrometry as previously described (Nilvebrant & Sparf 1983a).
`Radioligand binding studies in Chinese hamster ovary cells were
`carried out in culture plates. Briefly, cell homogenates were incu-
`bated with (-)3H-QNB and different concentrations of unlabelled
`antagonist under conditions of equilibrium (37" for 300 rnin.). In-
`cubations were terminated by rapid filtration and the amount of
`radioactivity determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Total
`binding of (-)3H-QNB was determined in the absence of any com-
`peting ligand, while non-specific binding was determined in the
`presence of unlabelled atropine (10 pM). Receptor-specific binding
`in each experiment was defined as total non-specific binding.
`
`In vivo studies. The antimuscarinic effects of PNU-200577 in vivo
`were studied in the anaesthetised cat, as previously described (Nil-
`vebrant e/ a/. 1996). Ten female European short-haired cats (2.2-
`3.1 kg, 8-10 months of age) were used in the experiments (PNU-
`200577, n=5; control, n=5). Briefly, bladder contractions were
`elicited by intraarterial administration of a submaximal dose of ace-
`tylcholine (1-2 pg . kg-'), while salivation was induced by supra-
`maximal electrical stimulation (6 V, 2 msec, 5 Hz) of the parasym-
`pathetic chorda-lingual nerve over 2 min. Acetylcholine was ad-
`ministered before and approximately 9 and 16 min. after each dose
`of PNU-200577 (2-203 nmol . kg-' [0.001-0.1 mg . kg-'1) or saline,
`which was administered by intravenous infusion in the right femoral
`vein at a rate of 1 ml . min.-' . kg-'. Electrical stimulation of the
`chorda-lingual nerve was performed before and approximately 7
`min. after each dose of PNU-200577 or saline.
`
`Data analysis. The concentration of carbachol that produced 50%
`of the maximal contractile response (ECSo) in guinea-pig isolated
`urinary bladder strips was determined in the absence and presence
`of different concentrations of PNU-200577, respectively. The affin-
`ity of PNU-200577 was calculated as the dissociation constant KB
`(Schild 1949). In the radioligand binding experiments, the concen-
`tration of PNU-200577 that inhibited (-)3H-QNB binding by 50%
`was determined from the experimental concentration-inhi-
`bition curves. Dissociation constants (Ki) were calculated by cor-
`recting the ICSo values for the radioligand-induced parallel shift and
`the differences in receptor density, using the method described by
`Jacobs et al. (1975); see also Nilvebrant & Sparf (1982 & 1983b) for
`details. Differences between the inhibitory effect exerted by PNU-
`
`200577 on urinary bladder contraction and on salivary secretion in
`the anaesthetised cat were analysed for each dose using a paired
`Student's t-test. Differences between the doses of antagonist causing
`a 50% inhibition of these responses (ID5,,) were also analysed. All
`data are expressed as mean2S.E.M. P values cO.05 were considered
`statistically significant.
`
`Drugs and chemicals. The following drugs and chemicals were used:
`PNU-200577 [(R)-N,N-diisopropyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethyl-
`phenyl)-3-phenylpropanamine, as the mandelate salt (batch nos. CA
`007 075:l and CA 007 075:3); Pharmacia & Upjohn AB, Sweden];
`atropine sulphate, carbachol (carbamylcholine chloride), acetylcho-
`line chloride and phenyl methyl sulphonyl fluoride (Sigma Chemical
`Company, U.S.A.); (-)3H-QNB (specific radioactivity 38.845.4
`Ci . mmol-'
`(1.43-1.63 Tbq . mmol-'); Du Pont NEN Research
`Products, U.S.A.); Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and HAM'S
`F12 medium (National Veterinary Institute, Sweden); foetal bovine
`serum albumin (HyClone Lab, U.S.A.); L-glutamine and penicillin/
`streptomycin (ICN Biomedicals, U.S.A.). Other chemicals used
`(analytical grade) were purchased from general commercial sources.
`(-)3H-QNB was diluted in absolute ethanol. Fresh solutions of
`PNU-200577, carbachol, atropine and acetylcholine were prepared
`for each experiment; for functional in vilro studies dilutions were
`made in double distilled water, while for in vivo studies solutions
`were diluted in saline.
`
`Results
`Functional in vitro studies.
`PNU-200577 produced a concentration-dependent. parallel,
`rightward shift in the concentration-response curve to car-
`bachol in guinea-pig urinary bladder strips. The maximum
`response to carbachol was not depressed. The mean KB
`value for PNU-200577 was 0.84+0.09 nM (n=20). Schild
`plot analysis for PNU-200577 determined a pA2 value of
`9.14 and a slope that was close to unity (0.99). This indi-
`cates that PNU-200577 is a competitive antagonist at the
`muscarinic receptors in the guinea-pig urinary bladder.
`
`Radioligand binding studies.
`PNU-200577 caused a concentration-dependent inhibition
`of ( -)3H-QNB binding in homogenates of guinea-pig uri-
`nary bladder, parotid gland, heart and cerebral cortex
`(table 1). The PNU-200577 concentration-inhibition curves
`of (-)3H-QNB binding were parallel and had Hill coef-
`ficients ( ~ t ~ )
`close to unity (table l), indicating that PNU-
`200577 binds to a single population of muscarinic binding
`sites in each tissue.
`
`Table 1.
`Dissociation constants (K,) and Hill coefficients (nH) for PNU-200577 and tolterodine, as determined by competitive radioligand binding
`studies in homogenates of guinea-pig tissues.
`
`Tissue
`Urinary bladder
`Parotid gland
`Heart
`Cerebral cortex
`a Data from Nilvebrant et al. (1996).
`Results are mean2S.E.M. of n separate experiments.
`
`PNU-200577
`K, (nM)
`2.920.3
`5.220.3
`1.1 20.1
`0.6020.04
`
`nH
`0.9820.07
`1.0620.07
`1.04+0.04
`0.9320.04
`
`Tolterodine"
`K, (nM)
`2.720.2
`4.820.3
`1.620.04
`0.7520.01
`
`nH
`1.02?0.03
`1.0420.03
`1.04?0.06
`1.0520.03
`
`n
`6
`5
`5
`5
`
`n
`8
`7
`6
`7
`
`~
`
`~
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1015 - Page 2
`
`

`
`ANTIMUSCARINIC POTENCY/BLADDER SELECTIVITY O F A TOLTERODINE METABOLITE
`
`171
`
`Table 2.
`Dissociation constants (K,) and Hill coefficients (nH) for PNU-
`200577 and tolterodine at human muscarinic receptors expressed in
`Chinese hamster ovary cells.
`PNU-200577
`Receptor
`K, (nM)
`subtype
`nH
`2.350.2
`1.0220.03
`ml
`2.020.5 0.9220.03
`m2
`2.520.5 0.9320.04
`m3
`2.820.2 0.9720.04
`m4
`2.950.4
`I.Ollr0.04
`m5
`Data from Nilvebrant rt al. (1996).
`Results are expressed as mean2S.E.M. of 4 6 separate experiments.
`
`To1 terodined
`nH
`Ki (nM)
`3.050.2
`1.03?0.04
`3.820.7 1.0020.04
`3.420.8 1.06-tO.03
`5.0?0.8
`1.05+-0.07
`3.420.8 1.00+-0.05
`
`PNU-200577 was a potent inhibitor of ( -)3H-QNB bind-
`ing in homogenates of Chinese hamster ovary cells express-
`ing human muscarinic ml-m5 receptors (table 2). Overall,
`Ki values for PNU-200577 were similar at the respective
`muscarinic receptor subtypes.
`
`In vivo studies.
`intraarterially) produced
`Acetylcholine (0.5-8 (g * kg-'
`dose-dependent contraction of the urinary bladder in the
`anaesthetised cat, with a dose of 1-2 pg . kg-' intraarteri-
`ally producing a reproducible submaximal response (data
`not shown). PNU-200577 produced dose-dependent inhi-
`bition of acetylcholine-induced urinary bladder contraction
`(fig. I), with a mean IDSo of 1554 nmol * kg-' (n=5). The
`threshold dose (ID30) for inhibition of acetylcholine-in-
`duced urinary bladder contraction was 7 2 3 nmol . kg-I.
`Electrical stimulation of the chorda-lingual nerve in-
`duced a mean salivary secretion of 321231 p l . 2 min.-'.
`PNU-200577 produced dose-dependent inhibition of elec-
`trically stimulated salivation (fig. I ) with an ID30 and IDSO
`of 21 t 2 and 4022 nmol * kg-I, respectively (P<0.05 and
`
`U Bladder contraction
`-C Salivation
`
`75
`
`-50 1
`
`r
`1
`
`8
`
`~
`
`"
`
`-
`
`
`
`~ Q I
`10
`
`r ~
`
`~
`
`100
`
`1 ~
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`~
`1000
`
`r
`
`l
`
`-
`
`Dose (nrnol*kg-')
` Effect of PNU-200577 on acetylcholine-induced urinary
`Fig. I ,
`bladder contraction and electrically stimulated salivary secretion in
`the anaesthetised cat. Results are expressed as percentage inhibition
`of the maximum response in each experiment, and are the mean
`(S.E.M. of 5 separate experiments. *=P<0.05 versus inhibition of
`salivary secretion (paired Student's t-test).
`
`P<O.Ol versus inhibition of bladder contraction). This indi-
`cates that PNU-200577 is three times more potent at the
`urinary bladder compared to the salivary gland.
`In control animals the administration of saline had only
`minor effects on the basal response to bladder contraction
`and salivation. Neither PNU-200577 nor saline had a sig-
`nificant effect on heart rate (data not shown).
`
`Discussion
`In the anaesthetised cat, PNU-200577 produced a dose-de-
`pendent inhibition of acetylcholine-induced urinary bladder
`contraction and electrically stimulated salivation, and was
`almost three times more potent for inhibition of urinary
`bladder contractions compared with salivation (ID50 15 and
`40 nmol . kg-', respectively). It may be argued that it would
`have been preferable to induce bladder contractions and
`salivation using an identical means of stimulation, i.e. either
`electrically or chemically with a muscarinic agonist given
`intravenously. However, both methods have practical limi-
`tations. For example, bladder contractions induced by elec-
`trical stimulation of the pelvic nerve are partly resistant to
`blockade by atropine and other muscarinic receptor antag-
`onists; indeed, the cholinergic component constitutes only
`about 30% of the response (unpublished observations),
`while the remainder is non-cholinergic non-adrenergic med-
`iated. This is well known to be the case in animal bladders,
`as shown in numerous in vitro and in vivo studies (Anders-
`son 1988 & 1993; Wein et al. 1994). However, since it is
`generally accepted that contractions of the human bladder
`are mediated mainly by muscarinic receptors (Andersson
`1993; Wein et al. 1994), we found it more relevant to study
`only the cholinergic component of the bladder response in
`the cat. Acetylcholine must be administered close to the tar-
`get organ in order to avoid degradation. We therefore used
`intraarterial injections because it is not possible to simul-
`taneously stimulate both the bladder and the salivary
`glands by intravenous administration of acetylcholine with-
`out using doses high enough to kill the animals. We also
`tried to administer stable analogues of acetylcholine (e.g.
`carbachol, methacholine) by intravenous injection. In gen-
`eral, however, this method resulted in an unstable baseline
`bladder response over time, together with low and variable
`stimulation of salivation. The inhibition exerted by muscar-
`inic antagonists could therefore not be reliably determined
`and reproduced between animals (data not shown). In the
`present study, chemical stimulation of the bladder with i.a.
`acetylcholine and electrical stimulation of the salivary
`glands were therefore the methods of choice in terms of
`reliable and consistent responses. Both responses were
`q
`
`~
`elicited by the natural transmitter, acetylcholine, but the
`concentration of acetylcholine at the muscarinic receptors
`in the bladder and salivary gland is obviously unknown, as
`always in in vivo experiments. Thus, it cannot be excluded
`that a difference in end-organ activation to some extent can
`explain the bladder selectivity of PNU-200577. However, in
`this context, it should be noted that the corresponding in
`
`I
`
`
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1015 - Page 3
`
`

`
`172
`
`LISBETH NILVEBRANT ET AL.
`
`vivo data on atropine and oxybutynin in previous studies
`were clearly in line with the general clinical experience with
`these drugs (Gillberg et al. 1994; Nilvebrant et al. 1996).
`The selectivity profile of PNU-200577 observed in this
`study is identical to that of tolterodine (Nilvebrant et al.
`1996), although PNU-200577 is more potent than the par-
`cnt compound in vivo. ID50 values for tolterodine were 101
`and 257 nmol * kg-I, respectively, for the inhibition of uri-
`nary bladder contraction and salivation (Nilvebrant et ul.
`1996). A likely explanation for the higher potency of PNU-
`200577 in vivo is that a very low percentage (<5%) of tolter-
`odine is unbound in serum, whereas >30% of PNU-200577
`exists as the unbound drug (unpublished observations).
`Since the total serum drug concentrations of tolterodine
`and PNU-200577 are similar following oral administration
`of the parent compound (unpublished observations), the re-
`sponse observed in vivo following oral administration of tol-
`terodine is likely to be, in part, the result of the activity of
`unbound PNU-200577.
`The findings of this study indicate that the pharmaco-
`logical profile of PNU-200577 in vitro is also essentially
`identical to that of tolterodine (Nilvebrant et al. 1996). In-
`deed, PNU-200577 was a potent and competitive antagonist
`at muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig isolated urinary blad-
`der strips and exhibited a high affinity for muscarinic recep-
`tors in the urinary bladder, parotid gland, heart and cer-
`ebral cortex. In addition, PNU-200577 had similar affinity
`for all five muscarinic receptor subtypes expressed in Chi-
`nese hamster ovary cells (K, 2.0-2.9 nM), as previously
`shown for tolterodine (K, 3 .O-5.0 nM) (Nilvebrant et al.
`1996). Thus, as for tolterodine, the selectivity profile of
`PNU-200577 in vivo cannot be attributed to selectivity for
`a single muscarinic receptor subtype (Nilvebrant et al.
`1996). It is interestingly to note that oxybutynin, a muscar-
`inic antagonist that exhibits a ten-fold higher selectivity for
`m3 over m2 receptors in vitro, displays the reverse selectivity
`profile to PNU-200577 and tolterodine in the anaesthetised
`cat, i.e. oxybutynin inhibits salivation by 80% at doses re-
`quired for 50% inhibition of the urinary bladder response
`(Nilvebrant et ul. 1996). Thus, the reverse selectivity pattern
`observed for oxybutynin compared with PNU-200577 and
`tolterodine may be related to the difference in relative affin-
`ity for M3/ni3 and M2/m2 receptors. Other compounds with
`selectivity for M3/m3 over M2/m2 receptors in vitro, such as
`darifenacin and UH-AH 37, exhibit an identical selectivity
`profile to oxybutynin in the anaesthetised cat (Nilvebrant et
`ti/. 1996). In contrast, the M2/m2 selective compound AQ-
`RA 741 was found to exhibit a bladder selectivity in vivo,
`which was similar to that demonstrated for tolterodine (Nil-
`vebrant et al. 1996). The data on AQ-RA 741 may suggest
`a functional role for M2/m2 receptors in bladder contrac-
`tion and, thus, in the selectivity for bladder over salivary
`glands demonstrated for PNU-200577 in vivo.
`In summary, the pharmacological in vitro and in vivo pro-
`files of PNU-200577 are almost identical to those of toltero-
`dine, the parent compound. In view of its high antimuscar-
`
`inic potency, lower degree of protein binding and similar
`serum concentration in humans after oral administration of
`the parent compound, PNU-200577 may contribute to the
`therapeutic action of tolterodine.
`
`References
`Andersson, K.-E.: Current concepts in the treatment of disorders
`of micturition. Drugs 1988, 35, 477494.
`Andersson, K.-E.: The pharmacology of lower urinary tract smooth
`muscles and penile erectile tissues. Pharmacol. Rev. 1993, 45,
`253-308.
`Andersson. S. H. G., A. Lindgren & P-0. Edlund: Metabolism q/’
`tolterodine in rat, mouse, dog und man. 4th International Society
`Study of Xenobiotics Meeting. Seattle, August 27-31, 1995.
`Caulfield, M. P: Muscarinic receptor-characterization, coupling
`and function. Pharmacol. Therap. 1993. 58, 3 19-379.
`Gillberg, P-G., A-.R. Modiri & B. Sparf: Tolterodine - a new agent
`with tissue effect selectivity for urinary bladder. Neurotrrol. Uro-
`dyn. 1994, 13, 435436.
`Hulme, E. C., N. J. M. Birdsall & N. J. Buckley: Muscarinic recep-
`tor subtypes. Annu. Rev. Pharmucol. Toxicol. 1990,30, 633-673.
`Jacobs, S., K.-J. Chang & P Cuatrecasas: Estimation of hormone
`receptor affinity by competitive displacement of labelled ligand.
`Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1975. 66, 687-692.
`Naerger, H., C. H. Fry & L. Nilvebrant: Effect of tolterodine on
`electrically induced contractions of isolated human detrusor
`muscle from stable and unstable bladders. Neurourol. Urodyn.
`1995, 14, 524-526.
`Nilvebrant, L.: On the muscarinic receptors in the urinary bladder
`and the putative subclassification of muscarinic receptors. ACIN
`pharmacol. et toxicol. 1986, 59 (Suppl. I), 1-45.
`Nilvebrant, L. & B. Sparf: Muscarinic receptor binding in the
`guinea pig parotid gland. Different affinities of some anticholin-
`ergic drugs between the parotid gland and ileum. Scand. J.
`Gastroenterol. 1982, 17 (Suppl. 72), 69-77.
`Nilvebrant, L. & B. Sparf: Differences between binding affinities of
`some antimuscarinic drugs in the parotid gland and those in the
`urinary bladder and ileum. Actapharmacol. et rovicol. 1983a. 53.
`304313.
`Nilvebrant, L. & B. Sparf: Muscarinic receptor binding in the
`guinea pig urinary bladder. Actapharmacol. et toxicol. 1983b, 52,
`30-38.
`Nilvebrant, L. & B. Sparf: Dicyclomine, benzhexol and oxybutynin
`distinguish between subclasses of muscarinic binding sites. Eur.
`J. Phurmncol. 1986, 123, 133-143.
`Nilvebrant, L., G. Glas, A. Jonsson & B. Sparf: The in vitro pharma-
`cological profile of tolterodine - a new agent for the treatment of
`urinary urge incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn. 1994,13.433435.
`Nilvebrant, L., M. Stahl& K.-E. Andersson: Interaction of toltero-
`dine with cholinergic muscarinic receptors in human detrusor.
`Neurourol. Urodyn. 1995, 14, 523-524.
`Nilvebrant, L., S. Sundquist & P-G. Gillberg: Tolterodine is not
`subtype (ml-m5) selective but exhibits functional bladder selec-
`tivity in viva Neurourol. Urodyn. 1996, 15, 310-31 1.
`Postlind, H., A. Lindgren & S. H. G. Andersson: Characterization
`of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the in vitro metrrb-
`olism of tolterodine. XIth International Symposium on Micro-
`sornes and Drug Oxidation. Los Angeles Jul 21-24, 1996.
`Schild, H. I.: pAx and competitive drug antagonism. Brit. J. Phurm-
`acol. Chemotherap. 1949,4, 277-280.
`Wein, A. J., P. A. Longhurst & R. M. Levin: Pharmacologic treat-
`ment of voiding dysfunction. In: Urodynamics: principles. pruc-
`rice and application (2nd ed). Eds.: R. A. Munday, T. P Stephen-
`son and A. J. Wein. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1994, pp.
`43-70.
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1015 - Page 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket