throbber
Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` by guest on August 6, 2012
`
`0090-9556/98/2604-0289–293$02.00/0
`DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
`Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`
`Vol. 26, No. 4
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`TOLTERODINE, A NEW MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST, IS METABOLIZED BY
`CYTOCHROMES P450 2D6 AND 3A IN HUMAN LIVER MICROSOMES
`
`HANS POSTLIND, ÅSA DANIELSON, ANDERS LINDGREN, AND STIG H. G. ANDERSSON
`
`Department of Drug Metabolism, Pharmacia & Upjohn AB
`
`(Received February 11, 1997; accepted January 9, 1998)
`
`This paper is available online at http://www.dmd.org
`
`ABSTRACT:
`
`Tolterodine, a new muscarinic receptor antagonist, is metabolized
`via two pathways: oxidation of the 5-methyl group and dealkylation
`of the nitrogen. In an attempt to identify the specific cytochrome
`P450 enzymes involved in the metabolic pathway, tolterodine was
`incubated with microsomes from 10 different human liver samples
`where various cytochrome P450 activities had been rank ordered.
`Strong correlation was found between the formation of the 5-hy-
`droxymethyl metabolite of tolterodine (5-HM) and CYP2D6 activity
`(r2, 0.87), as well as between the formation of N-dealkylated
`tolterodine and CYP3A activity (r2, 0.97). When tolterodine was
`incubated with human liver microsomes in the presence of com-
`pounds known to interact with different P450 isoforms, quinidine
`was found to be the strongest inhibitor of the formation of 5-HM.
`
`Ketoconazole and troleandomycin were found to be the strongest
`inhibitors of the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine. A weak
`inhibitory effect on the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine was
`found with sulfaphenazole, whereas tranylcypromine did not inhibit
`the formation of this metabolite. Microsomes from cells overex-
`pressing CYP2D6 formed 5-HM, whereas N-dealkylated tolterod-
`ine was formed by microsomes expressing CYP2C9, -2C19, and
`-3A4. The Km for formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine by CYP3A4
`was similar to that obtained in human liver microsomes and higher
`for CYP2C9 and -2C19. We conclude from these studies that the
`formation of 5-HM is catalyzed by CYP2D6 and that the formation
`of N-dealkylated tolterodine is predominantly catalyzed by CYP3A
`isoenzymes in human liver microsomes.
`
`[(R)-N,N-diisopropyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-
`Tolterodine
`phenylpropanamine] is a new muscarinic receptor antagonist specif-
`ically developed for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence and
`other symptoms associated with overactive bladder (Nilvebrant et al.,
`1997). Following oral administration, tolterodine is rapidly absorbed
`from the gastrointestinal tract and exhibits extensive first-pass metab-
`olism. Metabolites are formed via two pathways: oxidation of the
`5-methyl group to a 5-hydroxymethyl derivative (5-HM1) (PNU-
`200577; labcode DD 01) and dealkylation of the nitrogen (fig. 1). In
`humans, about 80% of an administered oral dose of tolterodine is
`excreted in the urine, the main metabolites being the 5-carboxylic
`acids of tolterodine, N-dealkylated tolterodine, and their glucuronide
`conjugates. Less than 1% of the parent compound is excreted un-
`changed (Brynne et al., 1997).
`In a previous study in healthy volunteers, one subject showed
`notably lower systemic clearance than the overall average. This dis-
`similarity was probably due to differences in metabolic capacity
`(Brynne et al., 1997). However, the specific P450 enzymes involved
`in the metabolism of tolterodine have not been identified. Such
`knowledge is of great importance to predict potential drug interactions
`and genetic variations in drug metabolism. In this study, we per-
`formed experiments in which the formation of metabolites of toltero-
`dine was correlated with marker P450 activities in human liver mi-
`
`FIG. 1.Main metabolic pathways of tolterodine in human liver microsomes.
`
`crosomes. We also used inhibitors and isoenzymes expressed using
`recombinant
`technology to determine the individual enzymes in-
`volved in the metabolism of tolterodine.
`
`1 Abbreviations used are: P450, cytochrome P450; 5-HM, 5-hydroxymethyl
`metabolite of tolterodine; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; Cli, intrin-
`sic clearance (Vmax/Km); V, rate of metabolite formation.
`
`Send reprint requests to: Dr. Hans Postlind, Department of Drug Metabolism,
`Pharmacia & Upjohn AB, S-751 82 Uppsala, Sweden.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Chemicals. [14C]Tolterodine 4.2 and 0.85 MBq/mg, 5-HM [(R)-N,N-diiso-
`propyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethylphenyl)-phenylpropanamine], N-deal-
`kylated tolterodine, and N-dealkylated 5-HM were synthesized at Pharmacia &
`Upjohn AB (Uppsala, Sweden). b-NADPH was obtained from Merck KGaA
`(Darmstadt, Germany), whereas a-naphthoflavone, quinidine, sulfaphenazole,
`289
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1010 - Page 1
`
`

`
`290
`
`POSTLIND ET AL.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` by guest on August 6, 2012
`
`FIG. 2.A representative radiochromatogram from incubation of tolterodine with
`human liver microsomes.
`
`nonlinear regression and correlation coefficients using linear regression and
`GraphPad Prism software.
`
`Results
`Metabolite Identification. Human liver microsomes converted
`[14C]tolterodine into several products in the presence of b-NADPH.
`Fig. 2 shows a representative radiochromatogram containing four
`major peaks at retention times of 11.5, 14, 23, and 26 min. The
`identity of the metabolites was confirmed by comparison with the
`retention times and product-ion mass spectra, obtained by collision-
`induced dissociation of protonated molecular ions ([M1H]1), of
`synthesized reference standards (data not shown). N-Dealkylated
`5-HM (retention time, 11.5 min) had a [M1H]1 ion at m/z 300, 5-HM
`(retention time, 14 min) at m/z 342, and N-dealkylated tolterodine
`(retention time, 23 min) at m/z 284. The peak at 26 min corresponded
`to intact [14C]tolterodine.
`Enzyme Kinetics. Pooled human liver microsomes were used to
`calculate the apparent Km, Vmax, and Cli values, which are shown in
`table 1. Fig. 3 shows Eadie-Hofstee plots for the formation of 5-HM
`and N-dealkylated tolterodine. Plots for both metabolites were linear,
`indicating the involvement of single P450 isoforms in the reactions.
`Correlation Experiment. Tolterodine was incubated with ten dif-
`ferent human liver microsomal samples, where different P450 activ-
`ities had been rank ordered (HepatoScreen test kit). The rate of
`formation of 5-HM and N-dealkylated tolterodine (fig. 1) varied
`approximately 6- and 7-fold, respectively, among the samples (fig. 4).
`Correlations between the rate of formation of tolterodine metabolites
`and different P450 marker activities are shown in table 2. The for-
`mation of 5-HM correlated strongly with dextromethorphan O-dem-
`ethylation (r2, 0.87), a marker for CYP2D6 activity (Schmid et al.,
`1985), whereas no correlation was obtained for other P450 activities.
`Testosterone 6b-hydroxylation, a marker for CYP3A activity (Wax-
`man et al., 1988), showed a strong correlation with the formation of
`N-dealkylated tolterodine (r2, 0.97). A relatively strong correlation
`was also obtained toward total P450 content and the formation of this
`metabolite (r2, 0.76).
`Chemical Inhibition Experiments. The effect of various sub-
`stances, at different concentrations, on the formation of metabolites in
`pooled human liver samples is shown in fig. 5. a-Naphthoflavone, an
`inhibitor of CYP1A isoenzymes (Guengerich, 1992; Tassaneeyakul et
`
`tranylcypromine, and troleandomycin were obtained from Sigma. Ketocon-
`azole was kindly provided by the Janssen Research Foundation (Beerse,
`Belgium). All other chemicals were of high purity and were obtained from
`usual commercial sources.
`Human Liver Microsomes. A HepatoScreen test kit with 10 different
`human liver microsomal samples was obtained from Human Biologics, Inc.
`(Phoenix, AZ) and used in correlation experiments. Four of the samples were
`from males. The microsomes had been characterized with respect to the
`following enzyme activities: 7-ethoxyresorufin O-dealkylation (CYP1A), caf-
`feine 3-demethylation (CYP1A2), coumarin 7-hydroxylation (CYP2A6), tol-
`butamide methyl-hydroxylation (CYP2C9), S-mephenytoin 4-hydroxylation
`(CYP2C19), dextromethorphan O-demethylation (CYP2D6), chlorzoxazone
`6-hydroxylation (CYP2E1), testosterone 6b-hydroxylation (CYP3A), lauric
`acid 11-hydroxylation (CYP2E1) and lauric acid 12-hydroxylation (CYP4A),
`benzphetamine N-demethylation (unknown), and total P450 content. Pooled
`human liver microsomes were obtained from XenoTech LLC (Kansas City,
`KS) and used in enzyme kinetic and inhibition experiments.
`Overexpressed P450 Isoenzymes. Microsomes containing expressed P450
`isoforms from human lymphoblast cells (CYP1A1 and -1A2) or insect cells
`(CYP2C8, -2C9-Arg, -2C19, -2D6, and -3A4) and nontransfected cells were
`purchased from Gentest (Woburn, MA).
`Incubation Conditions. All incubations with liver microsomes were car-
`ried out at a protein concentration corresponding to 1 mg/ml in 100 mM
`potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1 mM b-NADPH at 37°C. In the
`experiments measuring the enzyme kinetics, 5–200 mM tolterodine was incu-
`bated in a final volume of 250 ml for 15 min. In correlation experiments, the
`HepatoScreen test kit was incubated at 150 mM concentration in a final volume
`of 1 ml for 30 min. Inhibition experiments were carried out at tolterodine
`concentrations equal to the apparent Km for formation of 5-HM and N-
`dealkylated tolterodine (7 and 50 mM, respectively) in a final volume of 1 ml
`for 15 min. The different inhibitors were dissolved in methanol and then added
`in 10 ml (1% v/v final concentration) to the microsomes (10 ml of methanol
`was used in control experiments). a-Naphthoflavone, sulfaphenazole, tranyl-
`cypromine, and troleandomycin were added at a final concentration of 1, 10,
`and 50 mM, quinidine at 0.1, 1, and 10 mM (5-HM) or at 1, 10, and 50 mM
`(N-dealkylated tolterodine), and ketoconazole at 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mM. Incuba-
`tions containing troleandomycin were preincubated with microsomes and 1
`mM b-NADPH for 15 min before addition of tolterodine. All other substances
`tested for inhibition were added just before tolterodine.
`Microsomes containing expressed P450 isoforms from human lymphoblast
`cells or insect cells (20 pmol, respectively) were incubated with 10 mM
`tolterodine, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1 mM
`b-NADPH in a final volume of 250 ml at 37°C for 20 min. Microsomes from
`nontransfected cells were used as controls. In enzyme kinetic experiments,
`incubations were performed as described above with 10 –200 mM tolterodine.
`Under the conditions used, the formation of tolterodine metabolites was
`linear with respect to incubation time and protein concentrations.
`The reactions were terminated by addition of acetone (1:1 v/v) and stored at
`220°C. Before analysis, the microsomal protein was precipitated by centrif-
`ugation at 3200 rpm, and the acetone in the collected supernatant evaporated
`with a stream of nitrogen. A 100 –200-ml aliquot of the remaining supernatant
`was used for HPLC analysis.
`HPLC Analysis. The incubations were analyzed for the parent drug and its
`metabolites by HPLC using two LKB 2150 pumps, an LKB 2152 LC control-
`ler, Pharmacia UV-M monitor set at 280 nm, Beckman 171 radioisotope
`detector, a Supelco PKB 100 (2 cm) precolumn, and a Supelco PKB 100
`(150 3 4.5 mm) column. The mobile phase was 20 mM ammonium acetate in
`methanol (pH 4.5). The solvent flow rate was 1 ml/min, and a gradient of
`decreasing polarity [time (min)/% methanol: 0/10, 5/20, 35/45, 40/100, 50/
`100) was used.
`Calculations. The amount of each metabolite was calculated from the
`radiochromatogram as the (% area of the metabolite)/(% area of all metabolites
`1 parent compound), and the results are expressed as in relation to milligram
`of microsomal protein or picomole of P450 per minute. The retention times of
`formed metabolites were compared with the retention times of synthesized
`reference standards, and their identity was further confirmed by electrospray
`ionization mass spectrometry. The enzymatic constants were calculated using
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1010 - Page 2
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` by guest on August 6, 2012
`
`TOLTERODINE METABOLISM BY HUMAN LIVER MICROSOMES
`
`291
`
`Enzyme kinetics for the formation of the 5-hydroxymethyl and N-dealkylated
`metabolites of tolterodine in pooled human liver microsomes
`
`Correlation between the rate of formation of tolterodine metabolites and total
`P450 content and different P450 marker activities in human liver samples
`
`TABLE 1
`
`TABLE 2
`
`Parameter
`
`Metabolite
`
`5-HM
`
`N-Dealkylated Tolterodine
`
`Vmax (pmol/mg protein 3 min)
`Km (mM)
`CIi (ml/min 3 mg protein)
`
`317
`7
`47
`
`687
`52
`13
`
`Metabolism
`
`P450 Isoenzyme
`
`Total P450 content
`7-Ethoxyresorufin O-dealkylation
`Caffeine 3-demethylation
`Coumarin 7-hydroxylation
`Tolbutamide methyl-hydroxylation
`S-Mephenytoin 4-hydroxylation
`Dextromethorphan O-demethylation
`Chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation
`Testosterone 6b-hydroxylation
`Lauric acid 11-hydroxylation
`Lauric acid 12-hydroxylation
`Benzphetamine N-demethylation
`
`1A
`1A2
`2A6
`2C9
`2C19
`2D6
`2E1
`3A
`2E1
`4A
`Unknown
`
`Correlation (r2)
`
`5-HM
`
`N-Dealkylated
`Tolterodine
`
`—a
`—a
`—a
`—a
`—a
`—a
`0.87b
`—a
`—a
`—a
`—a
`—a
`
`0.76c
`—a
`—a
`—a
`0.64d
`—a
`—a
`0.22
`0.97b
`0.29
`0.43
`0.27
`
`a p . 0.2.
`b p , 0.0001.
`c p , 0.001.
`d p , 0.01.
`
`FIG. 3.Eadie-Hofstee plots for the formation of the 5-HM and N-dealkylated
`tolterodine in human liver microsomes ([S], substrate concentration).
`
`FIG. 4.Rate of formation of the 5-HM and N-dealkylated tolterodine in human
`liver microsomes from different individuals.
`
`al., 1993), did not significantly inhibit the metabolism of tolterodine
`at concentrations used in this study. Quinidine, which is regarded as
`a specific inhibitor of CYP2D6 (Inaba et al., 1985), almost completely
`inhibited the formation of 5-HM at 10 mM. High concentrations of
`quinidine also produced slight inhibition of the formation of N-
`dealkylated tolterodine. The strongest inhibition of the formation of
`N-dealkylated tolterodine was observed with ketoconazole, which
`inhibited formation of this metabolite by .70% at a concentration of
`1 mM but did not affect the formation of 5-HM. A strong inhibition
`was also observed for the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine with
`troleandomycin, which is known to specifically interact with CYP3A
`isoenzymes (Guengerich and Shimada, 1991). Troleandomycin had
`
`FIG. 5.Effect of various cytochrome P450 inhibitors on the rate of formation of
`the 5-HM (A) and N-dealkylated tolterodine (B) at a 7 and 50 mM concentration
`of tolterodine, respectively, in human liver microsomes.
`
`no effect on the formation of 5-HM. Sulfaphenazole, a competitive
`inhibitor of CYP2C9 (Baldwin et al., 1995), was found to have a weak
`inhibitory effect on the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine at a
`concentration of 50 mM (,30%), whereas tranylcypromine, an inhib-
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1010 - Page 3
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` by guest on August 6, 2012
`
`292
`
`POSTLIND ET AL.
`
`TABLE 3
`
`TABLE 4
`
`Metabolism of tolterodine by microsomes from cells overexpressing P450
`isoenzymes
`
`Enzyme kinetics for the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine in microsomes
`from cells overexpressing P450 2C9-Arg, -2C19, and -3A4
`
`P450 Isoenzyme
`
`1A1
`1A2
`2C8
`2C9-Arg
`2C19
`2D6
`3A4
`
`Rate of Formation (pmol/pmol P450 3 min)
`
`5-HM
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`5.0 6 0.35
`ND
`
`N-Dealkylated Tolterodine
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`0.25 6 0.05
`1.51 6 0.06
`ND
`0.23 6 0.03
`
`Data are mean 6 SD of two experiments. ND, not detectable.
`
`itor of CYP2C19 (Inaba et al., 1985; Wienkers et al., 1996), did not
`affect the formation of this metabolite at concentrations used in this
`study.
`Metabolism by Overexpressed P450 Isoenzymes. Microsomes
`from cells overexpressing CYP1A1, -1A2, -2C8, -2C9-Arg, -2C19,
`-2D6, or -3A4, together with microsomes from nontransfected cells,
`were incubated with 10 mM tolterodine in the presence of b-NADPH.
`Microsomes from cells overexpressing CYP2D6 catalyzed the forma-
`tion of 5-HM, whereas N-dealkylated tolterodine was formed in
`microsomes overexpressing CYP2C9-Arg, -2C19, and -3A4 (table 3).
`The enzyme kinetic constants for the formation of N-dealkylated
`tolterodine by microsomes are shown in table 4. No metabolites were
`formed in incubations with microsomes from nontransfected cells
`(data not shown).
`
`Discussion
`The results presented in this study provide evidence for the involve-
`ment of CYP2D6 in the formation of 5-HM and CYP3A as the major
`enzyme involved in the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine. The
`formation of 5-HM is dependent on CYP2D6, based on a high
`correlation with dextromethorphan O-demethylation, inhibition by
`quinidine, and formation of the metabolite only in cell microsomes
`overexpressing CYP2D6. The formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine
`correlated strongly with testosterone 6b-hydroxylation. A relatively
`strong correlation was also obtained toward total P450 content. This
`is in accordance with immunochemical and inhibition studies indicat-
`ing that as much as 60% of the total P450 content in human liver may
`be CYP3A isoenzymes (Guengerich, 1990).
`According to the results from the HepatoScreen test kit, the in-
`volvement of CYP2C9 in the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine
`could be substantial. This was, however, not confirmed by experi-
`ments with sulfaphenazole, an inhibitor described as specific for this
`P450 isoenzyme (Baldwin et al., 1995). Only high concentrations (50
`mM) showed a weak inhibitory effect (,30%) on the formation of
`N-dealkylated tolterodine. Furthermore, the activities of CYP2C9 and
`-3A in the test kit were found to correlate with each other (r2, 0.60).
`Tranylcypromine, which has been described as an inhibitor of S-
`mephenytoin 4-hydroxylation (CYP2C19) (Inaba et al., 1985; Wien-
`kers et al., 1996), did not inhibit the formation of N-dealkylated
`tolterodine at concentrations used in this study. Ketoconazole and
`troleandomycin, both known to interact with CYP3A (Guengerich and
`Shimada, 1991; Maurice et al., 1992), were found to be the strongest
`inhibitors of the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine. A marginal
`inhibitory effect on the formation of this metabolite was also observed
`at high concentrations of quinidine. This is probably not an effect on
`CYP2D6 but rather a result of nonspecific inhibition of CYP3A, as
`quinidine is a known substrate for this P450 isoenzyme (Guengerich
`et al., 1986). The formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine was detected
`
`Parameter
`
`Vmax (pmol/pmol P450 3 min)
`Km (mM)
`CIi (ml/min 3 pmol P450)
`
`P450 Isoenzyme
`
`2C9-Arg
`
`1.86
`74
`0.025
`
`2C19
`
`12.3
`70
`0.176
`
`3A4
`
`1.48
`47
`0.031
`
`in microsomes overexpressing not only CYP3A4 but also CYP2C9
`and -2C19. The Km for formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine with
`CYP3A4 was 47 mM, similar to that obtained in human liver micro-
`somes (52 mM), whereas Km values for CYP2C9 and -2C19 was about
`70 mM. Estimates of the relative Cli values per picomole of P450
`using these overexpressed enzymes indicated that formation of N-
`dealkylated tolterodine was about 6- and 7-fold higher for CYP2C19,
`respectively, compared with CYP3A4 and -2C9. However, human
`liver does not contain equimolar concentrations of the different P450
`isoforms, and the levels of b-NADPH-P450 reductase may vary
`considerably among different cDNA-expressed preparations and also
`differ from that found in human liver. Consequently, enzyme turnover
`numbers may vary substantially not only between the different prep-
`arations but also in comparison to human liver. Thus, there is no firm
`basis for extrapolation of relative Cli values obtained with cDNA-
`expressed enzymes to human liver. CYP3A4 had the lowest Km
`compared with CYP2C9 and -2C19. As CYP3A4 is also the major
`P450 isoenzyme expressed in human liver, it is reasonable to assume
`that the Vmax in human liver microsomes is higher for CYP3A4 than
`for CYP2C9 and -2C19. If this is the case, then the contribution of
`lower Vmax, higher Km enzymes, i.e. CYP2C9 and 2C19, will be
`completely obscured. Taken together, the results of the present study
`indicate that the formation of N-dealkylated tolterodine is predomi-
`nantly catalyzed by CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes. Estimates
`of the Cli values from data obtained in pooled human liver micro-
`somes also showed good agreement with the results of a study in
`healthy volunteers that reported that about 80% of tolterodine is
`predominantly metabolized via formation of 5-HM (Brynne et al.,
`1997).
`Clinical studies have demonstrated that individuals with reduced
`CYP2D6-mediated metabolism represent a high-risk group in the
`population with a propensity to develop adverse drug effects (Smith,
`1986). The number of drugs identified as being affected by CYP2D6
`polymorphism has increased steadily over the years and includes
`diverse classes such as b-adrenoreceptor antagonists, tricyclic antide-
`pressants, neuroleptics, and other miscellaneous drugs like dextro-
`methorphan and codeine (Daly et al., 1993; Murray, 1992). CYP3A is
`the major P450 subfamily in human liver and is involved in the
`metabolism of .50% of pharmaceutical drugs on the market. In
`addition, CYP3A enzymes have been reported to be involved in
`interactions with several drugs such as macrolides, ketoconazole,
`cyclosporin, and others (Honig et al., 1993; Periti et al., 1992; Pichard
`et al., 1990; Wrighton and Stevens, 1992). The possibility of clinical
`drug interaction at the enzyme level thus exists, especially if toltero-
`dine is administered at the same time as a compound that is prefer-
`entially metabolized by CYP2D6 or to individuals associated with the
`CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype. However, the large amount of
`CYP3A in the liver and the fact that tolterodine is predominantly
`eliminated via oxidation by CYP2D6 makes it less likely that clini-
`cally significant drug-drug interactions would occur with CYP3A
`substrates in individuals with the CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer
`phenotype.
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1010 - Page 4
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` by guest on August 6, 2012
`
`TOLTERODINE METABOLISM BY HUMAN LIVER MICROSOMES
`
`293
`
`References
`
`Baldwin SJ, Bloomer JC, Smith GJ, Ayrton AD, Clarke SE and Chenery RJ (1995) Ketoconazole
`and sulphaphenazole as the respective inhibitors of P4503A and 2C9. Xenobiotica 25:261–
`270.
`Brynne N, Stahl MMS, Halle´n B, Edlund PO, Palme´r L, Ho¨glund P and Gabrielsson J (1997)
`Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tolterodine in man: A new drug for the treatment
`of urinary bladder overactivity. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 35:287–295.
`Daly AK, Cholerton S, Gregory W and Idle JR (1993) Metabolic polymorphisms. Pharmacol
`Ther 57:129 –160.
`Guengerich FP (1990) Mechanism-based inactivation of human liver microsomal cytochrome
`P-450 IIIA4 by gestodene. Chem Res Toxicol 3:363–371.
`Guengerich FP (1992) Characterization of human cytochrome P450 enzymes. FASEB J 6:745–
`748.
`Guengerich FP and Shimada T (1991) Oxidation of toxic and cancerogenic chemicals by human
`cytochrome P450 enzymes. Chem Res Toxicol 4:391– 407.
`Guengerich FP, Mu¨ller-Enoch D and Blair IA (1986) Oxidation of quinidine by human liver
`cytochrome P-450. Mol Pharmacol 30:287–295.
`Honig PK, Wortham DC, Zamani K, Conner DP, Mullin JC and Cantilena LR (1993) Terfena-
`dine-ketoconazole interaction. Pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic consequences.
`JAMA 269:1513–1518.
`Inaba T, Jurima M, Mahon WA and Kalow W (1985) In vitro inhibition studies of two isozymes
`of human liver cytochrome P-450: Mephenytoin p-hydroxylase and sparteine monooxygenase.
`Drug Metab Dispos 13: 443– 448.
`Maurice M, Pichard L, Daujat M, Fabre I, Joyeux H, Domergue J and Maurel P (1992) Effects
`of imidazole derivatives on cytochrome P450 from human hepatocytes in primary culture.
`FASEB J 6:752–758.
`
`Murray M (1992) P450 enzymes: in inhibition mechanisms, genetic regulation and effects of
`liver disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 23:132–146.
`Nilvebrant L, Halle´n B and Larsson G (1997) Tolterodine - a new bladder selective muscarinic
`receptor antagonist: Preclinical pharmacological and clinical data. Life Sci 60:1129 –1136.
`Periti P, Mazzei T, Mini E and Novelli A (1992) Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of macroli-
`des. Clin Pharmacokinet 23:106 –131.
`Pichard L, Fabre I, Fabre G, Domergue J, Saint Aubert B, Mourad G and Maurel P (1990)
`Cyclosporin A drug interaction. Screening for inducers and inhibitors of cytochrome P450
`(cyclosporin A oxidase) in primary cultures of human hepatocytes and in liver microsomes.
`Drug Metab Dispos 18:595– 606.
`Schmid B, Bircher J, Preisig R and Kupfer A (1985) Polymorphic dextromethorphan metabo-
`lism: Co-segregation of oxidation of O-demethylation with debrisoquine hydroxylation. Clin
`Pharmacol Ther 38:618 – 624.
`Smith RL (1986) Polymorphism in drug metabolism-implications for drug toxicity. Arch Toxicol
`9 (suppl):138 –146.
`Tassaneeyakul W, Brikett DJ, Veronese ME, McManus ME, Tukey RH, Quattrochi LC, Gelboin
`HV and Miners JO (1993) Specificity of substrate and inhibitor probes for human cytochromes
`P450 1A1 and 1A2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 265:401– 407.
`Waxman DJ, Attisano C, Guengerich FP and Lapenson DP (1988) Human liver microsomal
`steroid metabolism: Identification of the major microsomal steroid hormone 6b-hydroxylase
`cytochrome P-450 enzyme. Arch Biochem Biophys 263:424 – 436.
`Wienkers LC, Wurden CJ, Storch E, Kunze KL, Rettie AE and Trager WF (1996) Formation of
`(R)-8-hydroxywarfarin in human liver microsomes: a new metabolic marker of (S)-
`mephenytoin hydroxylase, P4502C19. Drug Metab Dispos 24:610 – 614.
`Wrighton SA and Stevens JC (1992) The human hepatic cytochrome P450 involved in drug
`metabolism. Crit Rev Toxicol 22:1–21.
`
`Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1010 - Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket