throbber

`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2022
`
`Wockhardt v. Janssen lPR2016-01582
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2022
`Wockhardt v. Janssen IPR2016-01582
`
`

`

`
`
`396
`
`397
`
`EFFECTIVE SUSTAINED ANDROGENIC SUPPRESSION WITH
`(D—Nal(2)6), NAFARELIN ACETATE: A NEW INTRANASAL FORQA
`OF LHRH AGONIST.
`Sulpyl Kalash and Mario Eisenberger ,
`Baltimore, MD; Milan Henzl
`and Philip Hoffman , Palo Alto, CA
`(Presentation to be made by Dr. Kalash)
`122
`To test
`the efficacy of an intranasal LHRH agonist,
`patients with previously untreated stage D2 prostate CA were
`randomized on to an ongoing trial comparing (D-Nal(2)6)—LHRH
`(nafarelin acetate, Syntex Research) at a dose of 0.3 mg by
`intranasal spray BID, to DES,
`1 mg p.o. TlD. Effective long term
`testosterone ('1') suppression to limits of detectability was achieved
`with nafarelin. Mean (T) values:—baseline-IJ.8 ng/ml; first week -
`
`6.7ng/ml; week lI-O.3 ng ml and 6 mos-0.2 ng/ml. Mean values with
`DES were:—baseline 4.3 ng/ml; first week-1.5 ng/ml; week 4 — 0.4
`ng/ml and 6 mos - 0.3 ng/ml.
`in patients receiving treatment for
`long periods of time (median follow—up 219 days), no (T) elevations
`were observed after morning nafarelin doses. The major cardio-
`vascular complications (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus,
`acute thrombo-phlebitis, deep vein thrombosis, and congestive
`heart failure) requiring early discontinuation of treatment occured
`only on the DES arm. One patient on nafarelin developed mild
`transient epistaxis which did not require treatment modification
`and another was switched to subcutaneous nafarelin due to com-
`pliance problems. Fifty-eight patients have been randomized to
`nafarelin and 64 to DES.
`Similar objective/subjective response
`rates were seen in both arms. With a median F/U of 6 mos (1—14
`mos), 82% and 76% of the nafarelin and DES patients respectively
`continue on treatment without evidence of disease progression.
`Nafarelin has a low incidence of
`toxicity and no major
`compliance problems. Contrary to previous reports on another
`intranasal LHRH agonist, nafarelin produces sustained suppression
`of (T)
`to the limits of detectability. Clinical benefits thus far
`seem comparable to DES and other forms of parenteral LHRH
`analogs.
`lntranasal administration of such compounds should
`enhance their attractiveness for clinical use by circumventing the
`need for daily subcutaneous administration.
`Further patient
`accrual and long term follow-up are needed to determine effect on
`disease free and overall survival.
`
`IN THE MANAGEMENT OF
`(H.D.)
`DOSE
`HIGH
`KETOCONAZOLE
`METASTATIC PROSTATIC CARCINOMA. Frans M.J. Debruyne, Fred
`J. witjes‘
`and
`the members of
`the Dutch
`South—East
`Cooperative Studygroup.
`(Presentation to be mady by Dr.
`Debruyne)
`inhibits testosterone production in
`Ketoconazole H.D.
`both the
`testes
`and adrenals
`and has
`therefore been
`recently advocated for
`the treatment of prostate cancer.
`79 patients
`(pts) with histologically proven metastatic
`carcinoma of
`the prostate were treated with Ketoconazole
`H.D..
`40 pts were untreated,
`18 pts had one hormonal
`treatment and 21 pts had several hormonal therapies before
`starting ketoconazole
`ILD.
`Two
`treatment
`regimes were
`compared: 3 x daily 400 mgr
`(48 pts) and 2x daily 600 mg:
`(31 pts) of a Ketoconazole suspension. RESULTS: Pretreated
`group: Objective response:
`(EORTC criteria) in 60% of the
`pts stable disease and in 40% progression at
`6 months.
`Subjective response (WHO criteria) was seen in 543 of the
`symptomatic patients (36 pts). Untreated group: objective
`response: CR, PR and SD was seen in 29 pts (73%) at
`6
`months
`and
`progression
`in
`11
`pts
`(27‘). Subjective
`improvement occured
`in
`82% of
`the
`symptomatic pts.
`Castration level of
`testosterone was obtained in all
`patients within 2 days. Endocrinologicall
`a
`further
`decrease in testosterone from 35 ng/dl
`(mean +SD)
`to 20
`ng/dl
`(mean + SD) within 2 days was seen in both therapy
`arms.
`(castration level
`30 ngr/dl) Side effects: No
`adrenal
`insufficiency or hepatic toxicity was observed.
`Major
`toxicity signs were gastro—intestinal disturbances
`(nausea—vomiting) which occured in 35% of
`the pretreated
`patients and 26% of the non-pretreated group.
`Conclusion: Ketoconazole E.D.
`is effective
`in
`the
`treatment of patients with prostatic cancer.
`In addition,
`it had a marked subjective effect in hormonally pretreated
`patients.
`
`398
`IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER.
`FLUTAMIDE
`Michael A. Keating*, Pamela P. Griffin*, Stephen F. Schiff*
`Boston, MA.(Presentation to be made by Dr. Keating)
`A twelve year experience with the oral non-steroidal
`anti—androgen Flutamide (750 mg qd) allows an assessment of
`its efficacy as therapy for advanced prostatic carcinoma.
`0f 80 patients entered in an open study, 69 were evaluable.
`Of these, 53% (37) achieved complete remission (CR)
`demonstrating total subjective response, normal serum acid
`phosphatase (SAP), cessation of hydronephrosis and improved
`or stable bone surveys. Partial remission (PR) showing
`subjective responses without normalized objective parameters
`occurred in 232 (16) patients. Failure of therapy was seen
`in another 16 patients.
`The average duration of response
`until progression of disease was 28.9 mos. for CR and 12.8
`mos. for PR. Correlation of treatment and tumor grade
`showed CR in 43% (19/44) poorly differentiated, 68% (13/19)
`moderately differentiated and 100% (5/5) well differentiated
`primaries.
`Tumor burden (as a function of T stage, SAP, and
`bone surveys) also correlated with response showing CR in
`222 (7/31) of severely, 687. (17/25) moderately and 100%
`(13/13) mildly afflicted patients. Flutamide was used as an
`alternative to diethylstilbesterol (DES)
`in 10 patients
`actively responding to DES but unable to tolerate its side
`effects.
`A continuation of CR (avg. 33.6 mos.) was seen in
`all 10 cases.
`of another 7 patients failing DES, only I
`achieved CR. Significantly, libido was preserved in 80%
`(29/36) of instances. Other side effects noted were
`gynecomastia 68% (47), altered liver function (3),
`methemoglobulinemia (2) and emesis (2). One death from
`hepatic failure occurred. These findings suggest Flutamide
`may be an effective alternative to conventional hormonal
`therapy in the primary treatment of advanced prostatic
`carcinoma and has encouraged a randomized, prospective
`study presently underway.
`
`399
`
`COMBINED TREATMENT WITH FLU‘l‘AMIDE IN ASSOCIATION
`WITH MEDICAL 0R SURGICAL CASTRATION.
`F. Labrie,
`A. Dupont, Y. Lacourciere, M. Giguere,
`A. Belanger, G. Monfette and J. Emond
`One hundred and nineteen previously untreated patients
`having clinical stage D prostate cancer received the can-
`bined treatment with the non-steroidal antiandrogen Fluta—
`mide in association with orchiectomy (13 patients) or the
`LHRH agonist
`(D-Trp6) LHRH ethylamide (106 patients). The
`duration of treatment is 515 days (100 to 1156 days). A
`positive objective response assess according to the cri—
`teria of the US National Prostatic Cancer Project has been
`observed in 115 out of 119 patients (96.6%) . Pain was
`initially present in 64% of patients and disappeared in all
`of them during the first month of treatment.
`Serum pro-
`static acid phosphatase was elevated in 85% of cases and
`returned to normal in 95% of cases. Complete, partial and
`stable responses have been obtained in 29 (24%) , 45 (37.8%)
`and 41 (34.5%) of patients, respectively. Of the 15
`(5%)
`deaths, 9 (7.6%) were due to prostate cancer while 6
`resulted frcm other causes. The probability of positive
`response after two years of treatment (according to
`Kaplan and Meier)
`is 60% while the probability of survival
`at the same time interval is 8895. This probability of
`survival should be compared to the rate of 40 to 60% ob-
`served with treat'ments limited to inhibition of testicular
`androgen secretion or action (by surgical or medical
`castration). The present data show that the canbined
`treatment in stage D2 prostate cancer shows advantages as
`compared to previous therapies.
`In terms of percentage of
`positive objective response at the start of treatment,
`duration of remission, survival and quality of life. The
`death rate is in fact decreased by 300% during the first
`two years of treatment while the side effects are limited
`to hot flashes and a decrease or loss of libido.
`It is
`most important to start the administration of the antian-
`drogen at the same time as surgical or medical castration.
`
`203A
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket