throbber
VOLUME 28
`
`· NUMBER 9
`
`· MARCH 20 2010
`
`JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`Phase II Multicenter Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus
`Prednisone Therapy in Patients With Docetaxel-Treated
`Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
`Daniel C Danila, Michael]. Morris, JohannS. de Bono, Charles f. Ryan, Samuel R. Den meade,
`Matthew R. Smith, Mmy-Ellen Taplin, Glenn f. Bubley, Thian Kheoh, Christopher Haqq, Arturo Molina,
`Aseem
`Michael Koswiszka, Steve M. Larson, Lawrence H.
`Martin Fleisher,
`and Howard I. Selzer
`
`See accompanying editorial on page 1447 and articles on pages 1481 and 1489
`
`A B S T R A C T
`
`Purpose
`Persistence of ligand-mediated androgen receptor signaling has been documented in castration(cid:173)
`resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs). Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a potent and selective inhibitor of
`CYP17, which is required for androgen biosynthesis in the testes, adrenal glands, and prostate
`tissue. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of AA in combination with prednisone to reduce
`the symptoms of secondary hyperaldosteronism that can occur with AA monotherapy.
`
`Patients and Methods
`treatment failure with
`Fifty-eight men with progressive metastatic CRPC who
`docetaxel-based chemotherapy received AA (1 ,000 mg daily) with prednisone (5 mg twice
`daily). Twenty-seven (47%) patients had received prior ketoconazole. The primary outcome
`was 2: 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, with objective response by Response
`criteria, and changes in Eastern Cooperative Oncology
`Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
`Group
`performance status (PS) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) numbers. Safety was
`also evaluated.
`
`Results
`A 2: 50% decline in PSA was confirmed. in 22 (36%) patients, including 14 (45%) of 31
`ketoconazo!e-naTve and seven (26%) of 27 ketoconazole-pretreated patients. Partial responses
`were seen in four (18%) of 22 patients with RECIST-evaluable target lesions. Improved ECOG PS
`was seen in 28% of patients. Median time to PSA progression was 169 days (95% Cl, 82 to 200
`days). CTC conversions with treatment from 2: 5 to< 5 were noted in 10 (34%) of 29 patients.
`The majority of AA-related adverse events were grade 1 to 2, and no AA-related grade 4 events
`were seen.
`
`Conclusion
`AA plus prednisone was well tolerated, with encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated
`CRPC patients. The incidence of mineralocorticoid-related toxicities (hypertension or hypokalemia)
`was reduced by adding low-dose prednisone. The combination of AA plus prednisone is
`recommended for phase ill investigations.
`
`J Clin Oneal 28:1496-1507. © 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`Prostate cancer progression despite castrate levels
`of testosterone is associated with a rising prostate(cid:173)
`specific antigen (PSA) level and represents a tran(cid:173)
`sition to the lethal phenotype of the disease to
`which most patients eventually succumb. The rise
`in PSA, an indication that androgen receptor
`(AR) signaling has been reactivated, is the result of
`se,lective and/or adaptive changes in the AR itself
`
`that are oncogenic for growth, of which AR over(cid:173)
`expression is the most common. 1 Tumor levels of
`ligand have received less attention. In 1984, Geller
`et af documented elevated levels of androgens in
`tissue homogenates of the prostates of men who
`were progressing on medical or surgical castra(cid:173)
`tion. Adrenal androgen synthesis was the postu(cid:173)
`lated source, although a failure to completely
`suppress intratumoral androgens could not be
`excluded. The finding of mcreased intratumoral
`
`From the Department of Medicine, Joan
`and Sanford E. Weill College of Medicine
`of Cornell University, Ithaca: Clinical
`Laboratories, Department of Radiology,
`and Sidney Kimmel Center ior Prostate
`and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan(cid:173)
`Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY;
`Cancer Research United Kingdom Centre
`for Cancer Therapeutics, Institute of
`Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospi(cid:173)
`tal. London, United Kingdom; University
`oi California-San Francisco Comprehen(cid:173)
`sive Cancer Center, San Francisco;
`Department of Clinical Resear;:;h and
`Development. Cougar Biotechnology, Los
`Angeles, CA; Chemical Therapeutics
`Program, The Sidney Kimmel Compre(cid:173)
`hensive Cancer Center, The Johns
`Hopkins University School of Medicine,
`Baltimore, MD; Division of Hematology(cid:173)
`Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospi(cid:173)
`tal; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard
`Medical School, and Beth Israel Deacon(cid:173)
`ess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
`
`Submitted August 31, 2009; accepted
`November 16, 2009; published online
`ahead of print at www.jco.org on
`February 16, 2010.
`
`Supported by Cougar Biotechnology,
`the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
`Center Specialized Program of
`Research Excellence (SPORE) Grant in
`Prostate Cancer (P50 CA92629), the
`Department of Defense Prostate
`Cancer Research Program IPC051382l
`and the Prostate Cancer Foundation.
`
`Presented in part at the 45th Annual
`Meeting of the American Society of Clini(cid:173)
`cal Oncology lASCO), May 29-June 2,
`2009, Orlando, FL. and the 44th Annual
`Meeting of ASCO, May 30.June 3, 2008,
`Chicago, IL
`
`Authors' disclosures of potential con(cid:173)
`flicts of interest and author contribu(cid:173)
`tions are found at the end of this
`article.
`
`Corresponding author: Howard L Scher,
`MD, Genitourinary Oncology Service,
`Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel
`Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers,
`Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
`1275 York Ave, New York, NY 1 0065;
`e-mail: Scherh@mskcc.org.
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical
`Oncology
`
`0732-1 B3X/1 0/2809-1496/$20.00
`
`DOl: 1 0.1200/JC0.2009.25.9259
`
`1496 © 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`WCK1024
`Page 1
`
`

`
`Phase II Study of Abiraterone Acetate in CRPC
`
`androgens was subsequently confirmed in microdissected lo(cid:173)
`cally recurrent and castration-resistant primary and metastatic
`lesions.3-6 In 2004, Holzbeierlein et al' first
`a microarray
`analysis of newly diagnosed primary and metastatic and separately
`posthormone-treated primary and progressive castration-resistant
`prostate cancers (CRPCs) that showed an up to five-fold induction
`of several enzymes involved in steroid hormone production. The
`9 suggested the pos(cid:173)
`finding, subsequently confirmed by others,8
`'
`sibility of intracrine
`as an additional mechanism of
`AR reactivation.
`Abiraterone (CB7630, Cougar Biotechnology, Los Angeles, CA)
`is a novel, selective, irreversible, and potent inhibitor of 17-[alpha](cid:173)
`hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17) enzymatic activity that has re(cid:173)
`cently been demonstrated to further reduce testosterone levels in the
`blood to undetectable range ( < 1 ng/dL), 10
`11 and is
`to
`'
`reduce de novo intratumor androgen synthesis.12 Significant antitu(cid:173)
`mor effects were seen in patients with progressive CRPC who had not
`received prior chemotherapy, where
`hormonal therapies
`are traditionally used.ll,l3 Ketoconazole, a weak inhibitor of adrenal
`steroid synthesis that suppresses many cytochrome P450 enzymes and
`other enzymes involved in the conversion of cholesterol to preg(cid:173)
`nenolone, has also shown activity in the same clinical context14
`15 but
`•
`18
`is associated with significant tox:icities. 16
`-
`Recognizing that PSA levels also rise in patients who are
`progressing after treatment with cytotoxic agents, we postulated
`that these tumors might also be sensitive to a potent AR signaling
`inhibitor. In a separate trial, we showed significant antitumor
`effects of abiraterone acetate (AA) monotherapy in this patient
`group, emphasizing further how considering these tumors as
`hormone-refractory can deny patients effective therapies. 19 The
`adverse events seen with AA monotherapy were
`those asso-
`ciated with secondary hyperaldosteronism,
`hypokale-
`mia, fluid retention, and hypertension that required treatment
`with the selective aldosterone inhibitor eplerenone or low-dose
`steroids to suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
`blunting the feedback rise in adrenocorticotropic hormone to re(cid:173)
`duce production of adrenal steroids with mineralocorticoid activ-
`11'20 Anticipating phase III development, we designed this study
`to confirm the antitumor activity of AA in patients with CRPC after
`failure of docetaxel-based chemotherapy using the proposed reg(cid:173)
`istration
`of AA at 1,000 mg daily in combination with
`prednisone at 5 mg twice daily, and separately, to begin to address
`the influence on outcome of the number and type of prior hor(cid:173)
`mone treatments, particularly ketoconazole.21 Importantly, the
`evaluation of this steroid combination was further supported by
`our work indicating that low-dose steroids can reverse clinical AA
`resistance and decrease steroid precursors upstream ofCYP17 that
`can activate AR signaling. Recognizing that PSA changes may not
`be a reliable indicator of the antitumor effects of an AR signaling(cid:173)
`directed therapy and that more informative indicators of clinical
`benefit represent a critical unmet need for the management of
`we also evaluated pre- and post~therapy circulating tumor
`cell ( CTC) number using an analytically valid assay that is cleared
`by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as an aid to
`monitoring treatment and prognosis in patients with breast,22
`colorectal,23 and prostate cancer.24
`
`Patients
`Castrate men (serum testosterone <50 ngfdL [< 2.0 nmol/L]) with
`metastatic prostate cancer who had experienced treatment failure >vith andro(cid:173)
`gen deprivation therapy and docetaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible.
`Disease progression was defined as documented PSA progression according to
`Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group 1 criteria25 and a PSA >
`or
`nn11Prf1VP progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
`(RECIST) criteria26 for patient~ \vith measurable disease. Patients had to
`have received prior chemotherapy 'vith docetaxel, and treatment ;v:ith up
`to two prior chemotherapy regimens was permitted. Prior treatment with
`ketoconazole was allowed and was recorded separately. Eligibility criteria
`also included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance
`status (PS) of :5: 2, (Kamofsky PS :2: 50%), normal serum potassium, and
`adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. With the exception of
`luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists, a minimum of 4 weeks
`must have elapsed from discontinuation of prior prostate cancer therapies and
`a minimum of 6 weeks for antiandrogen therapy, Patients were excluded if
`they had brain metastases or spinal cord compression, active autoimmune
`disease requiring corticosteroid therapy, uncontrolled hypertension, a de(cid:173)
`pressed cardiac ejection fraction or history of cardiac failure (New York Heart
`Association class III or IV), or a serious concurrent medical illness. The trial
`protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each site and
`was conducted in accordance with the Declaration
`current US
`
`Characteristic
`
`Age. years
`Median
`Range
`ECOG performance status
`0
`
`.2
`Unknown
`Gleason score
`Median
`Range
`Baseline PSA, ng/mL
`Median
`Range
`Involved metastatic sites
`Visceral (with or without bone or soft tissue)
`Bone only
`Soft tissue only
`Bone and soft tissue only
`Prior hormonal therapies
`LHRH agonists
`Orchiectomy
`Antiandrogens
`Diethylstilbestrol
`Steroids
`Dexamethasone
`Other
`Ketoconazole
`Prior lines of chemotherapy
`1
`> 1
`
`No. of
`Patients
`
`69.5
`44-86
`
`24
`31
`2
`
`7
`5-10
`
`189.6
`10.1-3,846
`
`13
`11
`8
`26
`
`57
`3
`53
`8
`21
`5
`20
`27
`
`44
`14
`
`%
`
`41
`53
`3
`2
`
`22
`19
`14
`45
`
`98
`5
`91
`14
`36
`9
`34
`47
`
`76
`24
`
`Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PSA, prostate(cid:173)
`specific antigen; LHRH, luteinizing hormone--releasing hormone.
`
`lVlvw.jco,org
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`1497
`
`WCK1024
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Danila et al
`
`Food and Drug Administration Good Clinical Practices, and local ethical
`and legal requirements.
`Study Design
`After written informed consent was obtained, eligible patients in this
`multicenter phase II clinical trial receivedM at 1,000 mg (four 250-mgtablets
`daily in the morning after an overnight fast) concurrently with prednisone at 5
`mg twice daily. Treatment was administered in 28-day cycles, and up to 12
`cycles of therapy were permitted; continuation beyond 12 cycles was allowed
`on approval by the investigators and sponsor.
`Patient Evaluation
`while
`Patients were seen and examined at the beginning of every
`receiving treatment, and adverse events were recorded using the National
`Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0. Potential attributions
`toM and prednisone were recorded separately. A CBC, chemistry panel, PSA,
`and
`levels were evaluated monthly.
`Antitumor Outcomes
`The primary study objective was determination of the proportion of
`patients achieving adecline in PSA ~ 50% according to Prostate Specific
`Antigen Working Group 1 criteria (PSAresponse). The maximal and 12-week
`post-therapy declines in PSA were recorded using waterfall plots. The maximal
`decline had to be confirmed by a second value obtained~ 4 weeks later.25
`Patients who had metastatic disease evident on baseline
`(computed
`tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, or bone scan) had follow-up
`studies at 3-month intervals. Measurable disease response rate was reported
`using the RECIST criteria, while post -treatment changes on radionuclide bone
`scan were reported as stable or progression
`assessment.
`Time to PSA progression was calculated for
`with PSA decline
`~ 50% from baseline at the time the PSA increased to 50% above the nadir and
`was > 5 ng/rnL. For those not meeting the PSA decline criteria, time to PSA
`progression was the time when PSA increased by 25% from baseline.
`Other end points recorded were changes in ECOG PS, and
`post-therapy CTC counts (number ofcells/7.5 rnL ofblood) wer.e enumer-
`
`ated separately using the CellTracks system (Veridex, Raritan, NJ), as
`28
`described previously.27•
`
`Statistical Analysis
`The primary end point of the trial was the proportion of patients who
`achieved a PSA decline of~ 50% from baseline that was confirmed by a second
`value following treatment 1Nith AA plus prednisone. The combination would
`be considered worthy of further study if~ 30% of patients met the end point
`and not worthy of further study if fewer than 15% achieved the end point.
`With a population of 50 patients, the null hypothesis would be rejected and
`further study of the combination would be warranted if> 25% of eligible and
`treated patients had a~ SOo/o decline in PSA (alpha of 6% with 86% power).
`
`Patients
`Between June 2007 and November 2007, 58 men with CRPC
`were enrolled across seven study centers: six in the United States and
`one in the United Kingdom. Patient demographics and baseline char(cid:173)
`acteristics are listed in Table 1. All were heavily pretreated with a
`number ofhormonal therapies that included a median of four (range,
`one to eight) prior antiandrogens in 52 (91 %) and estrogens in nine
`(16%), while 27 (47%) had prior ketoconazole. While all had been
`treated with prior docetaxel, 24% had also received a second chemo(cid:173)
`therapy regimen. Consistent with the advanced state of the popula(cid:173)
`tion, only 11 (19%) had disease limited to bone, while 13 (22%) had
`visceral spread, and 34 patients (59%) had soft tissue disease with or
`without osseous spread. The median PSA
`at baseline was 190
`ng!ml (range, 10 to 3,846 ng!ml). The median testosterone level was
`4.8 ng!dL (range, below limit of detection [0.05] to 30.5 ng!dL).
`
`A
`;:;'2.
`
`<(
`UJ
`CL
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`B
`;:;'2.
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`<(
`UJ
`CL
`N
`
`~
`~ -100
`$
`
`50% PSA decline, 8/27 (29.6%)
`
`50% PSA decline, 7/31 (54.8%)
`
`Fig 1. Changes in prostate-specific anti(cid:173)
`gen (PSA) levels with abiraterone acetate
`plus prednisone. Waterfall plots of (A)
`maximum PSA change and (BJ change at
`week 12. Patients with prior ketoconazole
`exposure appear on the left side of the
`panel in blue and those without prior ke(cid:173)
`toconazole exposure appear on the right
`side of the panel in gold.
`
`50% PSA decline, 7/27 (25.9%}
`
`50% PSA decline, 14/31 (45.1%)
`
`!lij\@i%$ Prior ketoconazole exposure (n = 27)
`
`Reference lines:
`
`-
`
`-90%
`
`No prior ketoconazole exposure (n = 31)
`
`@ PSA value clipped
`
`---50%
`
`---30%
`
`1498 © 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`JOURNAL OF CL!NlCAL ONCOLOGY
`
`WCK1024
`Page 3
`
`

`
`Phase II Study of Abiraterone Acetate in CRPC
`

`
`Table 2. ECOG Performance Score
`
`=58)
`
`Postbaseline ECOG Performance Score
`
`0
`
`2
`
`No. of
`No. of
`No. of
`No. of
`Patients Patients % Patients % Patients %
`
`24
`31
`2
`
`22
`14
`1
`37
`
`64
`
`2
`15
`1
`18
`
`2
`
`2
`
`3
`
`31
`
`Baseline ECOG
`Performance
`Score
`
`0
`
`2
`Total·
`
`Abbreviation: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
`•one patient did not have baseline ECOG recorded.
`
`Antitumor Effects
`PSk A waterfall plot of the maximal PSA decline and 12-week
`post-therapy PSA changes is shown in Figure 1. Overall, the propor(cid:173)
`tion ofpatients achieving a 50% or greater maximal decline in PSA was
`of 58; 95% CI, 30% to
`including 30% (8
`95%
`43%
`13% to 47%) of those who had received previous ketoconazole and
`of3 i; 95% CI, 3 7% to 73%) of those who were ketoconazole(cid:173)
`55%
`nai:ve. At the 12-week assessment, the overall proportion of patients
`achieving a 2: 50% decline in PSA was 36% (21 of 58; 95% CI, 24% to
`95% CI, 9% to 435%) of those who had
`48%), including26% (7
`received previous ketoconazole and 45% (14
`95% CI, 27% to
`63%) of those who were ketoconazole-naive. The differences in the
`proportion showing declines in PSA were not statistically significant.
`Overall, confirmed PSA responses of 2: 30%, 2: 50%, and 2: 90%
`decline were observed in 47o/o, 36%, and 16% of patients, respectively.
`In the prior ketoconazole versus ketoconazole-nai:ve patients, the con(cid:173)
`firmed PSA decline of;::: 30%, :2':: 50%, and 2 90o/o were, respectively,
`nine (33%) versus 18 (58%), seven (26%) versus 14 (45%), and zero
`(Oo/o) versus nine (29o/o) patients.
`
`Soft tissue. Twenty-two of 28 patients with baseline scans had
`lesions assessed by computed tomography in1aging; of these 22
`patients, partial responses were seen in four (18%), stable disease
`lasting more than 3 months in 13 (59%), and disease progression in
`five (23o/o).
`Osseous disease. Bone scans provided objective radiologic re(cid:173)
`sponse information for 27 evaluable patients of the 34 patients with
`baseline scans. By investigator assessment, 16 (59%) patients had
`stable disease and 11 ( 41 o/o) patients experienced disease progression.
`Clinical benefit and PS. Changes in ECOG PS from baseline were
`Overall, 16
`evaluated as an indication of clinical benefit
`patients (28o/o) had an improvement in ECOG PS, with 14 patients
`improving from PS 1 to PS 0, and one patient each improving from PS
`2 toPS l or PS 0. Four patients (7%) had a worsening PS, with tv.;ro
`patients each changing from baseline PS 0 to PS 1 or PS 1 to PS 2. PS
`remained stable among the remaining 3 7 { 64%) patients.
`Time to progression The overall median time to PSA progres(cid:173)
`sion was 169 days (95% CI, 86 to 200 days); based on prior exposure to
`ketoconazole, the median time to PSA progression was 198 days (95%
`82 to 393 days) among ketoconazole-nai:ve patients and 99 days
`(95% CI, 57 to 169 days) amongketoconazole-treated patient~ (Fig2).
`CTCs. Cell counts were available for all38 patients treated at the
`Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and four patients treated at
`the Royal Marsden
`Overall, 29 ( 69%)
`had unfavor(cid:173)
`able baseline counts (:2:: 5 cells/7.5 mL blood), of which 10 (34%)
`converted to a favorable count after treatment (Table 3).
`
`Safety and Tolerability
`The combination of AA and prednisone was well tolerated in this
`heavily pretreated population. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred
`No significant hypertension or hypokalemia
`infrequently (Table
`were noted as clinical signs of mineralocorticoid.excess with the pro(cid:173)
`sne'cti1Te addition of prednisone. No patients required treatment with
`mineralocorticoid antagonist eplerenone on this trial. Spinal cord
`
`1.00
`
`0.75
`
`0.50
`
`0.25
`
`- - Keto: median, 99 days (95% Cl, 57 to 169 days)
`~ No Keto: median, 198 days (95% Cl, 82 to 393 days)
`I
`Censored
`
`Fig 2. Time to prostate-specific antigen
`(PSA) progression with abiraterone acetate
`and prednisone in patients with and without
`prior ketoconazole (Keto) exposure.
`
`0
`
`40
`
`80
`
`120
`
`160
`
`200
`
`240
`280
`320
`Study Day
`
`360
`
`400
`
`440
`
`480
`
`520
`
`560
`
`www.jco.o.g
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`1499
`
`WCK1024
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Danila et al
`
`Table 3. Patients With High CTC Counts at Baseline Stayed on Treatment
`for a Shorter
`Unless Counts
`With Treatment
`
`CTC/7.5 ml of Blood
`Baseline < 5 CTC (n
`13)
`Post-treatment CTC 2 5 (n
`Post-treatment CTC < 5 (n
`Baseline 2 5 CTC (n = 29)
`Post-treatment CTC 2 5 (n = 19)
`Post-treatment CTC < 5 (n = 10)
`
`4)
`9)
`
`Abbreviation: CTC, circulating tumor cell.
`
`Time on Protocol (weeks)
`
`,;:; 12
`
`12-24
`
`> 24
`
`9
`
`4
`
`7
`3
`
`2
`4
`
`3
`6
`
`compressions were seen in two (3%) patients, which were deemed
`related to disease progression.
`
`This study is the second trial showing the activity of AA in patients
`with castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed on
`chemotherapy, and the first to explore the
`regimen
`currently under evaluation in two prospective
`phase
`III, placebo-controlled registration trials with primary end points
`of survival and progression-free survival (WW>v.dinicaltrials.gov,
`30 Antitumor activity was
`NCT00638690, and NCT00887l98)?9
`'
`demonstrated on the basis of post-therapy PSA declines, changes in
`soft tissue disease by RECIST, the lack of progression :in bone, and
`unfavorable to favorable changes in CTCs assessed ·with an analyt(cid:173)
`ically valid assay cleared by the US Food and Drug Admiristration
`for monitoring treatment effects in CRPC. The results show that the
`decision to treat a patient with progressive castration-resistant disease
`with chemotherapy does not necessarily mean that the tumor is resis(cid:173)
`tant to further hormone treatments.
`Noteworthy in this trial was the lower incidence ofhypokalernia,
`hypertension, and fluid retention (5%, < 5%, and < 10%, respec(cid:173)
`tively) compared with 55%, 17%, and 15%, respectively, relative to
`our separate study of AA ·without prednisone. 19 The hyperaldoste(cid:173)
`ronism syndrome developed in the absence of concomitant use of
`low-dose steroids frequently required treatment w:ith either a miner-
`
`Table 4. Incidence of Most Frequent (;,: 5%) Treatment-Related Adverse
`Events (N = 58)
`
`Grade 1
`
`Grade 2
`
`Grade 3
`
`Adverse Event
`
`No.
`
`Nausea
`Vomiting
`Diarrhea
`Constipation
`Fatigue
`Edema peripheral
`AST
`ALT
`Hypokalemia
`Dyspnea
`
`8
`5
`5
`3
`9
`4
`3
`2
`3
`2
`
`%
`
`14
`9
`9
`5
`16
`7
`5
`3
`5
`3
`
`No.
`
`%
`
`No.
`
`o/o
`
`0
`2
`0
`0
`9
`1
`3
`1
`0
`4
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`3
`
`16
`2
`5
`2
`
`7
`
`2
`
`Grade 4
`No.
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`NOTE: Two patients experienced hypertension, one each of grade 1 and
`grade 2.
`
`alocorticoid antagonist (eplerenone) or low-dose glucocorticoids.
`These data, coupled with the high frequency of comorbid conditions
`in this group and the risk of adrenal insufficiency in patients receiving
`glucocorticoids with prior docetaxel treatments, provided strong sup(cid:173)
`port for the combination of AA plus prednisone as the preferred
`regimen for further development
`This trial is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to address the
`effect of prior ketoconazole exposure on outcome, although .the time
`interval between prior ketoconazole therapy and protocol entry was
`highly variable, given that all of the patients were treated with chem(cid:173)
`otherapy in this interval. Patients with prior exposure to treatment
`and possible therapy-related selection pressure with ketoconazole h.ad
`an inferior percentage of PSA decline by 2: 50% compared WJth
`patients without prior ketoconazole exposure. The time to PSA pro(cid:173)
`gression tended to be shorter in patients with prior ketoconazole
`exposure compared with ketoconazole-naive patients. Although th:is
`difference did not reach statistical significance, these findings were
`considered in the design of the exclusion criteria for this phase III trial
`of AA and prednisone in patients with castrate metastatic prostate
`cancer postdocetaxel treatment failure. Unfortunately, the response to
`prior treatment with ketoconazole was not known, so the question of
`cross-resistance could not be fully addressed. These important find-
`will be addressed in the future in a dedicated trial. 13
`Given the modest association with changes in PSA and the limi(cid:173)
`tations of imaging distant metastases, there is an unmet medical need
`to develop tumor-specific markers to aid the selection of tar:;;etE~d
`therapies and to assess clinical outcome, Using a US Food and Drug
`Administration-cleared, analytically valid assay for CTC enumeration
`run in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified
`laboratory, we have shown that CTC counts are prognostic pretherapy
`33
`and the change in CI'Cnumberpost-therapyispredictive ofsurvival31
`-
`The CTC conversion rate after treatment with AA was also asso(cid:173)
`ciated with an extended time on treatment. The number. of patients
`treated in f4is study was too small to further explore associations •vith
`clinical outcome.
`In conclusion, this study showed biochemical, CTC, and radio(cid:173)
`logic evidence to support the evaluation of tllis AA and prednisone
`schedule in patients with progressive CRPC in a randomized study in
`the postchemotherapy
`with the primary end point of overall
`survival. Importantly, the trial also includes an evaluation of ere num(cid:173)
`ber as an
`response biomarker in the phase III trial of AA plus
`prednisone versus placebo. Moreover, these data indicate that the discov(cid:173)
`ery and development of drugs targeting steroid receptor signaling
`remain critically important for improving outcomes of this disease.
`
`Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following
`autlwr(s) indicated a financial or other interest that is relevant to the subject
`matter under consideration in this article. Certain relationships marked
`with a "U" are those for which no compensation was received; those
`relationships marked with a "C" were compensated. For a detailed
`description of the disclosure categories, or for more informatiou about
`AS CO's ca~zflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure
`Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in
`.
`Informatioll for Contributors.
`Employment or Leadership Position: Thian Kheoh, Cougar Biotechnology
`(C); Christopher Haqq, Cougar Biotechnology (C); Arturo Molina, Ortho
`
`15011 © 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`WCK1024
`Page 5
`
`

`
`Phase II Study of Abiraterone Acetate in CRPC
`
`Biotech/Cougar Biotechnology (C) Consultant or Advisory Role: Daniel
`C. Danila, Cougar Biotechnology (U); JohannS. de Bono, Cougar
`Biotechnology (U); Matthew R. Smith, Cougar Biotechnology (U); Steve M.
`Larson, Cougar Biotechnology (C); Howard I. Scher, Cougar Biotechnology
`(C), Veridex (U) Stock Ownership: Thian Kheoh, Cougar Biotechnology
`Honoraria: None Research Fnnding: Mary-Ellen Taplin, Cougar
`Biotechnology; Howard I. Scher, Cougar Biotechnology, Vecidex Expert
`Testimony: None Other Remuneration: None
`
`Conception and design: Daniel C. Danila, JohannS. de Bono,
`Christopher Haqq, Howard I. Scher
`Financial support: Christopher Haqq, Arturo Molina
`Administrative support: Christopher Haqq, Arturo Molina,
`Howard I. Scher
`
`Provision of study materials or patients: Daniel C. Danila, Michael J.
`Morris, I ohann S. de Bono, Charles J, Ryan, Matthew R. Smith,
`Mary-Ellen Taplin, Glenn J. Bubley, Christopher
`Howard I. Scher
`Collection and assembly of data: Daniel C. Danila, JohannS. de Bono,
`Charles J. Ryan,
`Thian Kheoh,
`Haqq,
`Arturo Molina, Aseem Anand, Michael Koscuiszka, Howard I. Scher
`Data analysis and interpretation: Daniel C. Danila, Michael J. Morris,
`Samuel R. Denmeade, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Glenn J. Bubley, Thian Kheoh,
`Christopher Haqq, Arturo Molina, Aseem Anand, Michael Koscuiszka, Steve
`M. Larson, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Martin Fleisher, Howard I. Scher
`Manuscript writing: Daniel C. Danila, JohannS. de Bono, Samuel R.
`Denmeade, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Glenn J. Bubley, Thian Kheoh,
`Christopher Haqq, Arturo Molina, Howard I. Scher
`Final approval of manuscript: Daniel C. Danila, Michael J. Morris,
`JohannS. de Bono, Charles J. Ryan, Samuel R. Denmeade, Matthew R.
`Smitb, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Glenn J. Bubley, Thian Kheoh, Christopher
`Haqq, Arturo Molina, Aseem Anand, Michael Koscuiszka, Steve M.
`Larson, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Martin Fleisher, Howard I. Scher
`
`1. Scher HI, Sawyers CL: Biology of progressive,
`castration-resistant prostate cancer: Directed thera(cid:173)
`pies targeting the androgen-receptor signaling axis.
`J Clin Oncol 23:8253-8261, 2005
`2. Geller J, Albert JD, Nochstein DA. et al: Com(cid:173)
`parison of prostatic cancer tissue dehydrotestosterone
`levels at the time of relapse following orchiectomy or
`estrogen therapy. J Ural 132:693.{396, 1984
`3. Suzuki K, Nishiyama T. Hara N, et al: Impor(cid:173)
`tance of the intracrine metabolism of adrenal
`androgens in androgen-dependent prostate cancer.
`Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:301-306, 2007
`4. Titus MA, Schell MJ, Lih FB. et al: Testosterone
`and dihydrotestosterone tissue levels in recurrent
`prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:4653-4657. 2005
`5. Nelson PS, Han D, Rochon Y, et al: Comprehen(cid:173)
`sive analyses of prostate gene expression: Conver(cid:173)
`gence of expressed sequence tag databases, transcript
`profiling and proteomics. Electrophoresis 21:11-23, 2000
`6. Montgomery RB, Mostaghel EA, Vessella R, et
`al: Maintenance of intratumoral androgens in meta(cid:173)
`static prostate cancer: A mechanism for castration(cid:173)
`resistant tumor growth. Cancer Res 68:4447-4454, 2008
`7. Holzbeierlein J, La I P, LaTulippe E. et al: Gene
`expression analysis of human prostate carcinoma
`during hormonal
`therapy
`identifies androgen(cid:173)
`responsive genes and mechanisms of therapy resis(cid:173)
`tance. Am J Pathol 164:217-227, 2004
`8. Stanbrough M, Bubley GJ, Ross K, et al:
`Increased expression of genes converting adrenal
`androgens to testosterone in androgen-independent
`prostate cancer. Cancer Res 66:2815-2825, 2006
`9. Mostaghel EA, Page ST, Lin OW, et al: Intra(cid:173)
`prostatic androgens and androgen-regulated gene
`expression persist after testosterone suppression:
`Therapeutic
`implications
`for castration-resistant
`prostate cancer. Cancer Res 67:5033-5041. 2007
`10. Yap T A, Carden CP, Attard G, et al: Targeting
`CYP17: Established and novel approaches in pros(cid:173)
`tate cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacal 8:449-457, 2008
`11. Attard G, Reid AH, Yap TA, et al: Phase I
`clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of CYP17, abi(cid:173)
`raterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant
`prostate cancer commonly remains hormone driven.
`J Clin Oncol 26:4563-4571, 2008
`
`12. Montgomery B, Mostaghel E, Nelson P, et al:
`Abiraterone suppresses castration resistant human
`prostate cancer growth in the absence of testicular
`and adrenal androgens. Am Assoc Cancer Res Spe(cid:173)
`cial Conference: Advances in Prostate Cancer Re(cid:173)
`search, San Diego, CA, January 21-24, 2009
`13. Ryan C, Efstathiou E, Smith M, eta!: Phase II
`multicenter study of chemotherapy (chemo)-naive
`castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) not ex(cid:173)
`posed to ketoconazole (keto), treated with abi(cid:173)
`raterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone. J Clin Oncol
`27:245s, 2009 {suppl; abstr 5046)
`14. Figg WD, Liu Y, Arlen P, et al: A randomized,
`phase II trial of ketoconazole plus alendronate ver(cid:173)
`sus ketoconazole alone in patients with androgen
`indE]pendent prostate cancer and bone metastases.
`J Urol 173:790-796, 2005
`15. Harris KA, Weinberg V. Bok RA. et al: Low dose
`ketoconazole with replacement doses of hydrocorti(cid:173)
`sone in patients with progressive androgen indepen(cid:173)
`dent prostate cancer. J Ural 168:542-545, 2002
`16. Trump DL, Havlin KH, Messing EM, et al:

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket