throbber
a 5-year survival of 80 to 90% for low-grade lesions. More in-
`W1 we or histologically poorly differentiated tumors are more likely
`vflieaur locally and metastasize. Metastatic disease is treated with the
`loemotherapy used it: bladder cancer, and the outcome is similar to
`[lit of metastatic transitional cell cancer of bladder origin.
`
`fumes moms
`VANCED BLADDER CANCER META—ANALYSIS COLLABORATION: Neoad-
`AD
`J-uvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and
`meta-analysis. Lancet 36111927, 2003
`
`61 Hyperplastic and Malignant Diseases of the Prostate
`
`543
`
`BORDEN LS JR et al: Bladder cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 15:227. ZOG3
`LINEBAN WM et al: The genetic basis of cancer of the kidney. J Urol 170:
`2163, 2003
`
`MEJEAN A et al: Prognostic factors of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1692821,
`2003
`7
`
`WHANG YE, GODLEY PA: Renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol 152213
`2003
`
`WINQUIST E et al: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for transitional cell carcinoma
`of the bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol
`l71:56l,
`2004
`
`IT'S
`S Pm,
`-ntents
`I hilar
`'.l‘O\Ig]-\
`II dis.
`)ass is
`tumor
`[10 de‘
`atiemg
`
`in
`
`HYPERPLASTIC AND it‘lALl5%iA?iT D¥SEASES OF TEE PROSTATE
`
`Howard I. Scher
`
`The frequency of both benign and malignant changes in the prostate
`increase with age. Autopsies of men
`the eighth decade of life show
`hyperplastic changes in >90% and malignant changes in >70% of
`individuals. The high prevalence of these diseases in an elderly pop-
`ulation with competing causes of morbidity and mortality mandates a
`risk-adapted approach to diagnosis and treatment. This can be achieved
`by considering these diseases as a series of states. Each state represents
`a distinct clinical milestone for which intervention(s) may be recom-
`mended based on the presence or risk of developing symptoms or death
`from disease in a given time frame (Fig. 81-1). For benign proliferative
`disorders, symptoms of urinary frequency, infection, and potential for
`obstruction are weighed against the side effects and complications of
`medical or surgical therapy. For prostate malignancies, the risk of de-
`veloping the disease, symptoms, or death from cancer are balanced
`against the morbidities of interventions recommended and preexisting
`comorbid conditions.
`
`In 2004, around 230,000 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed, of
`whom 29,900 succumbed. The absolute number of prostate cancer
`deaths has decreased in the past 5 years; this has been attributed by
`some to the widespread use of detection strategies based on monitoring
`prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, screening has not been
`proven to improve survival in prospective randomized trials. The
`adox management is that although the disease remains the second
`leading cause of cancer deaths in men, the almost 8:] ratio in incidence
`to prostate cancer—specific mortality shows that the majority of nten
`do not die of their disease.
`
`ANATOMY AND PATHOLOGY
`The prostate is located in the pelvis and is surrounded by the rectum,
`the bladder, the periprostatic and dorsal vein complexes that are re-
`Sponsible for erectile function, and the urinary sphincter that is re-
`sponsible for passive urinary control. The prostate is composed of
`branching tubuloalveolar glands arranged in lobules and surrounded
`by a stroma. The acinal unit includes an epithelial compartment made
`“P 0f epithelial, basal, and neuroendocrine cells and a stromal com-
`partment that includes fibroblasts and smooth-muscle cells. The com-
`partments are separated by a easement membrane. PSA and acid phos-
`Phatase (ACP) are produced in the epithelial cells. Both cell types
`express androgen receptors and depend on androgens for growth. Tes-
`‘°31er0ne, the major circulating androgen, is converted by the enzyme
`fa Teductase to dihydrotestosterone in the gland. Changes in prostate
`s'ze'0CCur during puberty and after the age of 55 in the periurethral
`P0171011 of the gland. Most cancers develop in the peripheral zone,
`Much Can often be palpated by a digital rectal examination (DRE).
`
`Nonmalignant growth occurs predominantly in the transition zone
`around the urethra.
`
`EPIDEMIOLOGY
`
`The development of a prostate cancer involves a multistep process.
`Hyperrnethylatien of the GSTPI gene promoter, leading to a loss of
`function of a gene that detoxifies carcinogens, is one early change.
`Epidemiologic studies show that the risk of being diagnosed with pros-
`tate cancer increases by a factor of 2 if one first-degree relative is
`affected and by 4 if two or more are affected. Current estimates are
`that 40% of early-onset and 5 to 10% of all cancers are hereditary and
`follow a Mendelian inheritance pattern. Prostate cancer affects ethnic
`groups differently. Matched for age, the prostates of African-American
`males have both a greater number of precursor prostatic intraepithelial
`neoplasia (PIN) lesions and larger tumors than white males, possibly
`related to the higher levels of testosterone seen in African-American
`males. These lesions are highly unstable, and typically multifocal.
`Polymorphic variants of the androgen receptor gene, the cytochrome
`P450 C17 gene, and the steroid Sat-reductase type II (SRDSAZ) gene
`have also been implicated in the variations in incidence. The incidence
`of autopsy-detected cancers is similar around the world, while the
`incidence of the clinical disease varies. Thus, environmental factors
`may play a role. High consumption of dietary fats, such as ct-linoleic
`acid, or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that form when red meats
`are cooked is believed to increase risk. Similar to breast cancer in
`Asian women, the risk of prostate cancer in Asian males increases
`when they move to western environments. Protective factors include
`the isoflavinoid genistein (which inhibits 5a-reductase), cruciferous
`vegetables that contain isothiocyanate sulfuraphane, retinoids such as
`lycopene (in pizza and tomatoes), and inhibitors of cholesterol bio-
`synthesis. The antioxidant or-tocopherol (vitamin E) and selenium may
`also reduce risk.
`
`DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT BY CLINICAL STATE
`
`The clinical states framework considers the risk of morbidity from an
`enlarging but nonmalignant gland; the probability that a clinically sig-
`nificant cancer is present in an individual with or without urinary
`symptoms: or, for those with a prostate cancer diagnosis; the proba-
`bility of developing symptoms or dying from disease. At any point in
`time, a patient resides in one state and remains there until the disease
`has progressed to the next state. Applying this paradigm, a patient with
`localized prostate cancer who has had all cancer removed surgically
`remains in the state of localized disease as long as the PSA remains
`undetectable. The time within a state becomes a measure of the impact
`of an intervention on the natural history of disease, be it benign or
`malignant in etiology, recognizing that the impact may not be assess-
`able for years. It also allows a distinction between cure—the elimi-
`nation of all cancer cells, the primary therapeutic objective when treat-
`ing most cancers—and cancer control, in which the tempo of the
`illness is modulated and symptoms controlled until the patient dies of
`other causes. It is the concept of cancer control that makes the man-
`
`
`
`enmcany
`
`localized
`disease
`
`
`Fl
`GUM 31-I
`Clinical states of prostate cancer. PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
`
`Clinical
`metastases:
`Noncaetrate
`
`V Clinical
`metastases.
`Caetrate
`
`
`WCK1009
`Page 1
`
`
`
`
`
`WCK1009
`Page 1
`
`

`
`544
`
`Part V Oncology and Hematology
`
`agement of prostate cancer unique. Ever; when a recurrence is docu-
`mented, immediate therapy is not always necessary. Rather, as at the
`time of diagnosis, the need for intervention is based on the tempo of
`the illness
`it unfolds in the individual, relative to the risk:reward
`ratio of the therapy being considered.
`
`NO CANCER DIAGNOSIS E’ Symptoms The need to pursue a diagnosis of
`prostate cancer is based on symptoms, an abnormal DRE, or an ele-
`vated serum PSA. The urologic history should focus on symptoms of
`outlet obstruction, continence, potency, or a change in ejaculatory pat-
`tern. Benign proliferative disease may produce hesitancy, intermittent
`voiding, a diminished stream,
`incomplete emptying, and postvoid
`leakage. The severity of these symptoms can be quantitated with the
`self-administered American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom
`Index (Table 81-1) recognizing that the degree of symptoms does not
`always relate to gland size. Resistance to urine flow reduces bladder
`compliance, leading to nocturia, urgency, and, ultimately, to retention.
`Infection. tranquilizing drugs, antihistamines, or alcohol can precipi-
`tate urinary retention. Prostatitis often produces pain or induration.
`Symptoms of metastatic disease include pain secondary to osseous
`metastases, although many are asymptomatic despite extensive spread.
`Less common are symptoms related to marrow compromise (mye—
`lophthisis), a coagulopathy, or spinal cord compression.
`
`Physical Exarfiination The DEE focuses on the size, consistency, and
`abnormalities within or beyond the gland. Many cancers occur in the
`peripheral zone and can be palpated on DRE. Carcinomas are char-
`acteristically hard, nodular, and irregular, while induration may be due
`to benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) er to calculi or tumor. Overall,
`20 to 25% of men with an abnormal DRE have cancer.
`
`PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTlGEN
`
`PSA is a kallii:rein-like serine protease that causes liquefaction of sem-
`inal coagulum. It is produced by both nonmalignant and malignant
`epithelial cells. PSA is prostate specific, not prostate cancer specific,
`and increases may occur from prostatitis, nonmalignant enlargement
`of the gland (BPH), prostate cancer, and prostate biopsies. The level
`is not affected by the performance of a DRE. It circulates in the blood
`as an inactive complex with the protease inhibitors a-,-antichymo-
`trypsin and Bymacroglobulin and has an estimated half-life in the
`serum of 2 to 3 days. Levels should be undetectable if the prostate has
`been removed. PSA immunostaining is used to establish a prostate
`cancer diagnosis.
`PSA testing was approved for early detection in 1994. It is rec-
`ommend on an annual basis along with a DRE for men over age 50
`
`(with an anticipated survival of >10 years; this includes men up to
`age 76 years). For African Americans and men with a family history,
`testing is advised to begin at age 40. The normal range of PSA is
`[0
`4 ng/mL. For values >4, the sensitivity for prostate cancer detection
`is 57 to 79%, the specificity is 59 to 68%, and the positive predictive
`value is 40 to 49%.
`
`The PSA-based criteria used to recommend a diagnostic prostate
`biopsy have evolved over time. PSA values may fluctuate for no ap_
`parent reason; thus, an isolated abnormal value should be confirmed
`before proceeding with further testing. Taese evolving criteria aim to
`increase the sensitivity of the test for younger men more likely to die
`of the disease and to reduce the frequency of detecting cancers of low
`malignant potential in elderly men more likely to die of other causes.
`Age-specific reference ranges apply a lower “upper” limit of normal
`for younger males and higher “upper” limit for older individuals. Dif_
`ferent thresholds alter sensitivity and specificity of detection. The
`threshold for performance of a biopsy is now 2.6 ng/mL for men under
`age 60. Prostate—specific antigen density (PSAD) measurements were
`developed to correct for the contribution of BPH to the total PSA level_
`PSAD is calculated by dividing the serum PSA by the estimated pmS_
`tate weight calculated by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Values <0_10
`are consistent with BPH, while those >O.15 suggest cancer. PSA ve_
`locizy is the rate of change in PSA levels over time. It is particularly
`useful for men with values that are rising in the seemingly “normal”
`range. Rates of rise >O.75 ng/mL per year suggest cancer. As an ex.
`ample, an increase from 2.5 to 3.9 in a 1-year period would warram
`further testing. Free and complexed PSA measurements are used when
`levels are between 4 and 10 ng/mL to decide who needs a biopsy. In
`cancer, the level of free PSA is lower. The ratios of free to total,
`complexed to total, and free to complexed PSA have also been used,
`In one series, specificity improved by 20% using a normal range of
`free/total >0.15; complexed/total <0.70; and free/complexed >0_25_
`A diagnostic algorithm based on the DRE and PSA findings is illus-
`trated in Fig. 81-2. In general, a biopsy is recommended if the DRE
`or PSA are abnormal.
`
`Prostate Biopsy A diagnosis of cancer is established by a TRUS-guided
`needle biopsy. Direct visualization assures that all areas of gland are
`sampled. A minimum of six separate cores, three from the right and
`three from the left, are advised, as is a separate biopsy of the transition
`zone, if clinically indicated. Performance of a biopsy is not advised in
`a patient with prostatitis until a course of antibiotics has been admin-
`istered. The positive predictive value of an abnormal DRE is 21%,
`while 25% of men with a PSA > 4
`and an abnormal DRE, and
`17% of men with a PSA of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL and normal DRE, leave
`cancer. Those with an abnormal PSA and negative biopsy are advised
`to undergo a repeat biopsy.
`
`nuns 31-1
`
`AUA System Index
`
`Questions to 5e Answered
`
`Over the past month, how ofeen you have had a sensation of not
`emptying your bladder coittpletely after you finislicd urinating‘!
`Over the past month, now often have you had to urinate again less than
`2 h after you linislied urinating?
`Over the past month, how often have you found you stopped and started
`again several times when you uriiiated?
`Over the past month, how often have you found it difficult to postpone
`urination?
`
`Over the past month. how often have you had a weak urinary stream?
`Over the past month, now often have you éiazl to pusl: c-r strain to begin
`urination‘?
`Over the past month. how many times did you most typically get up to
`urinate from the time you went to bet! at niglit until the time you got
`up in the ittoming?
`Sum of 7 circled numbers (AUA Symptom Score):
`
`AUA Symptom Score -fdircle .1 Number on Each line)
`less than 1
`Less than
`About Half
`More than
`Time in 5
`Half the Time
`the Time
`Half the time
`
`Almost
`Alwtlyf _,
`
`Not at All
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`D
`
`0
`0
`
`l
`
`E
`
`I
`
`l
`
`l
`l
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`2
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`3
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`4
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`5
`
`(None)
`
`(1 time)
`
`(2 times)
`
`(3 times)
`
`(4 times)
`
`(5 tim65)
`
`Nate: AUA. American Urological Association.
`
`Source: Barry M] et al: J Urol l48:l549. 1992. Used with permission.
`
`_
`
`._
`
`_
`
`WCK1009
`Pa e 2
`
`WCK1009
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Men >50 orAfrican Americans >45 or
`
`+ Family history
`
`
`
`
`
`DRE normal
`
`Abnormal PSA Normal
`Positive
`Borderline
`
`
`
`i
`' DHE
`
`.
`and PSA
`
`
`
`Total <4
`PSA velocity <0.75
`
`
`
`
`
`PSA 4-10
`
`+5
`
`Staging
`
`
`
`TRUS guided [ -TT
`(a—--{ Check % free PSA in 5-12 months ]
`...:.-a
`
`l
`
`__.,__"/°F'°*:E_S_'.*._lj271i—' B_i°e~°~ I-*9"-‘"'* .$:'=&9i."9_ I
`
`EUS guided biopsy
`
`t’4:*}—- Staging I
`
`
`
`Consider repeat
`
`TRUS guided biopsy W—_...._.:
`
`_"—'j‘-_:—’i
`.
`
`C-)r—- Repeat annuall
`
`
`
`Total <4
`PSA velocity >0.75
`
`
`
`FIGURE 81-2
`
`Algorithm for diagnostic evaluation of men based on digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen levels.
`
`Faiholofiu The noninvasive proliferation of epithelial cells within
`ducts is termed prostzztic imraepitiielial neaplasia. PIN is a precursor
`of cancer, but not all PIN lesions develop into invasive cancers. Of
`the cancers identified, >95% are adenocarcinomas; the remaining are
`squamous, transitional cell tumors, and rarely, carcinosarcomas. Me-
`tastases to the prostate are rare, but in some cases, transitional cell
`tumors of the bladder or colon cancers invade the gland by direct
`extension. Each core of the biopsy is examined for the presence of
`cancer, and the amount of cancer present is quantified. A measure of
`histologic aggressiveness is also assigned using the Gleason grading
`System, in which the dominant and secondary glandular histologic pat-
`terns are scored from 1 (well differentiated) to 5 (undifferentiated) and
`Sllmmed to give a total score of 2 to 10 for each tumor. The most
`P00Tly differentiated area of tumor (i.e., the area with the highest his-
`‘°l08iC grade) often determines biologic behavior. The presence or
`absence of perineural invasion and extracapsular spread are also re-
`corded.
`
`PSA-based detectéon strategies have changed the clinical spectrum
`Pfthe disease. Now, 95 to 99% of newly diagnosed cancers are clin-
`‘Cally localized, 40% are not palpable, and, of these, 70% are patho-
`tielftlically organ-confined. The downside of widespread use is the de-
`thatilfll and treatment of cancers with such a low malignant potential
`um] 9}’ Would not have shortened survival or produced symptoms
`impmge the patient’s lifetime. The side effects of treatment, including
`ese nce, incontinence, and bowel dysfunction, are unacceptable for
`mostafases. Formal clinical trials to assess the value of screening on
`of these Cancer morbidity and mortality areongoing. Until the results
`decisioe Studies are available, men are. advised to make an informed
`1'1 about whether to undergo testing.
`9:
`dgjgpon
`It is difficult to identify individuals who are at risk for
`Vegplng a cancer that is clinically significant. The l’rostate Cancer
`signed :10? Thai IS a double-blinded, randomized multicenter trial. de-
`:0 rev 0 investigate the ability of finasteride, a Sat-reductase inhibitor,
`ml the development of prostate cancer in men age 255 years.
`
`The prostate cancer detection rate was 18.4% (803 of 4364) for finas-
`teride and 24.4% (1 147 of 4692) for placebo-treated men. However,
`more of the cancers detected in the finasteride group were high-grade
`[37% (280 of 757) vs. 22% (237 of 1068 cancers) for the placebo].
`No effect on survival was detected. Vitamin E and selenium (the SE-
`LECT study) are also being tested as preventive agents.
`
`Treatment of Benign Disease Asymptomatic patients do not require treat-
`ment regardless of the size of the gland, while those with an inability
`to urinate, gross hematuria, recurrent infection, or bladder stories may
`require surgery. Typically, obstruction does not occur and the symp-
`toms iemain stable over time. In these cases, uroflowmetry can identify
`patients with normal flow rates who are unlikely to benefit from treat-
`ment and those with high postvoid residuals who may need other in-
`terventions. Psessure—flow studies detect primary bladder dysfunction.
`Cystoscopy is recommended if hematuria is do-Jumerited and to assess
`the urinary outflow tract before surgery. Imaging of the upper tracts is
`advised for patients with hematuria, a history of calculi, or prior uri-
`nary tract problems. Therapies such as finasteride, which blocks the
`conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. have been shown to
`decrease prostate size, increase urine flow rates, and improve symp-
`toms. They will also lower baseline PSA levels by 50%, an important
`consideration when using PSA to guide biopsy recommendations.
`a-Adrenergic blockers such as terazosin act by relaxing the smooth
`muscle of the bladder neck and increasing peak urinary flow rates. No
`data show that these agents influence the progression of the disease.
`Surgical approaches include a transurethral resection of the prostate
`(TURP), transurethral incision, or removal of the gland via a retro-
`pubic, suprapubic or perineal approach. TULIP (transurethral ultra-
`sound-guided laser-induced prostatectomy), coils, stents, and hyper-
`thermia are also utilized.
`
`PROSTATE CANCER STAGING The TNM staging system includes catego-
`ries for cancers that are palpable on DRE, those identified solely on
`the basis of an abnormal PSA (Tlc), those that are palpable but clin-
`
`WCK1009
`
`
`
`rant
`
`ital
`sed.
`e of
`>25.
`.lus-
`)RE
`
`ided
`l are
`and
`ition
`:d in
`min-
`ll %.
`and
`have
`rised
`
`r5t
`lys
`
`Repeat
`annually
`
`
`
`
`W]--' Repeat biopsy
`in 3-6 months
`
`WCK1009
`Page 3
`
`

`
`546
`
`Part V 0nco¥ugy and Hematology
`
`ically confined to the gland (T2), and those that have extended outside
`of the gland (T3 and T4) (Table 81-2). The assessment of disease
`extent based on DRE alone is inaccurate with respect to the extent of
`the disease within the gland, the presence or absence of capsular in-
`vasion, involvement of seminal vesicles, and extension of disease to
`lymph nodes. This led to a modification of the staging system to in-
`clude the results of imaging studies on the assignment of T stage.
`Unfortunately, no single test has proven to predict the pathologic stage
`accurately, be it the presence of organ-confined disease, se eeinal ves-
`ical involvement, or lymph node spread.
`TRUS is most frequently used to assess the primary tumor. but no
`consistent finding predicts cancer with certainty. TRUS is used pri-
`marily to direct prostate biopsies. Computed tomography (CT) scans
`lack sensitivity and specificity to detect extraprostatic extension and
`are inferior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in visualization of
`lymph nodes. Mi<I specificity is improved with an endorectal coil and
`aids in planning radiation therapy. T1-weighted images demonstrate
`the periprostatic fat, periprostatic venous plexus, perivesicular tissues,
`lymph nodes, and bone marrow. T2-weighted images demonstate the
`internal architecture of the prostate and seminal vesicles. Most cancers
`have a low signal, while the normal peripheral zone has a high signal,
`although the technique lacks sensitivity and specificity.
`Radionuclide bone scans are used to evaluate spread to osseous
`sites. This test is sensitive but relatively nonspecific because areas of
`increased uptake are not always related to metastatic disease. Healing
`fractures, arthritis, Paget’s disease, and other conditions will also show
`abnormal uptake. True-positive bone scan results are rare if the PSA
`<8 ng/mL and uncommon when the PSA < 10 ng/mL unless the
`tumor is high grade. When the PSA <10 ng/mL, a positive bone scan
`is usually falsely positive, which in turn, leads to additional low-yield
`testing.
`
`CLINICALLY LDCALIZED DlSEA§E Localized prostate cancers are clinically
`confined to the prostate. Patients with localized disease are managed
`by radical surgery, radiation therapy, or watchful waiting. Data from
`the literature do not provide clear evidence for the superiority of any
`one treatment. Choice of therapy needs consideration of several fac-
`
`l'ABl.E 81-2 Comparison of Ellnlral 5tage—by the TNM Classification
`System and the Whltmore-Jewett Staging System
`TNM
`Whitmore-Jeweit
`Stage Description
`Stage
`
`Description
`
`Tla Nonpalpable, with 5% or
`less of resccted tissue
`with cancer
`Tlb Nonpajpable. with >5%
`of resected tissue with
`cancer
`
`Tl:
`
`T2a
`
`T2b
`
`T2c
`
`Tia
`
`Nonpalpable, detected
`due to elevated serum
`PSA
`
`Palpable. half of one
`lobe or less
`
`half of one
`Pajpable,
`lobe but not both lohcs
`Falpable. involves both
`lobes
`Palpalele, unilateral
`extracaesulnr extension
`
`A1
`
`A2
`
`BIN
`
`Bl
`
`B2
`
`CI
`
`Well dit”l‘e.renti-ated
`tumor on few chips
`1“ I
`l ‘robe
`Involvement more
`diffuse
`
`Palpirhle, < one
`lobe, stlrrounded
`by normal tissue
`Ffalpnble. 4: one lobe
`
`Fatpablet one entire
`lnhe or both lobes
`Falpable, outside
`capsule, not into
`seminal vesicles
`
`'l'3b
`
`T3c
`
`C2
`
`Palpable, bilateral
`extracapsular extension
`Palpable, seminal
`Tumor invades seminal
`vesicle it'l\ olved
`vesiclets)
`
`Distant meta tases DMl Metastatic disease
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: Adapted from FF Schroder et al: TNM classification of prostate cancer. Prostate
`(Suppl; 4:129, i992; and American Joint Committee on Cancer, 1992.
`
`
`
`tors: the presence of symptoms, the probability that the untreated tu
`mor will adversely affect the patient during his lifetime and um‘
`require treatment, and whether the tumor can be cured by single-m S
`dality therapy directed at the prostate or requires both local and Sys:
`temic therapy to achieve cure. As most of the tumors detected are
`deemed clinically significant, most men undergo treatment.
`Comparing the outcomes of various forms of therapy is limited h
`the lack of prospective trials, referral bias, and differences in the out‘
`comes used. The primary outcomes are cancer control and treatment_
`related morbidities. These benchmarks of success or failure vary h
`modality. Often, PSA relapse-—free survival is used because an effect
`on metastatic progression or survival may not be apparent for years
`Based on a half-life in the blood of 3 days, PSA should be undetectablé
`in the blood 4 weeks after all prostate tissue has been removed by
`radical surgery. If PSA remains detectable, the patient is considered
`to have persistent disease. In contrast, the PSA does not become un‘
`detectable after radiation therapy because the remaining nonmalignant
`elements of the gland continue to produce PSA even if all cancer cells
`have been eliminated. Similarly, there is no adequate cancer C0ntro1
`definition for a patient treated with watchful waiting because PSA
`levels will continue to rise in the absence of therapy. Other outcomes
`are the time to objective progression (local or systemic) and cancer_
`specific and overall survival; however, these outcomes may take years
`to define.
`
`The more advanced the disease, the lower the probability of local
`control and the higher the probability of systemic relapse. More im-
`poitant is that within the categories of T1, T2, and T3 disease are
`tumors with a range of prognoses. Some T3 tumors are curable with
`therapy directed solely at the prostate, and some Tl lesions have a
`high probability of systemic relapse that requires the integration of
`local and systemic therapy to achieve cure. Tlc tumors particularly
`require the use of other factors to predict outcomes and select treat-
`ment. Many groups have developed prognostic models based on a
`combination of the initial T stage, Gleason score, and baseline PSA.
`Some are based on discrete cut points (PSA <10 or 2 10; Gleason
`score of S6, 7, or 28). Others are nomograms that use PSA and
`Gleason score as continuous variables. These algorithms are used to
`predict disease extent: organ confined vs. nonorgart confined, node
`negative or positive, and the probability of success using a PSA-based
`definition of failure specific to the local therapy under consideration.
`lzxactly what cut-off value would lead a patient to accept one form of
`therapy vs. another is an area of active debate. One nomogram to
`predict PSA relapse—free survival following radical surgery is illus-
`trated in Fig. 81-2. Specific nomograms have been developed for rad-
`ical prostatectomy, extemal—beam radiation therapy, and brachyther-
`apy (seed implantation). These are being refined continually t0
`incorporate other clinical parameters and biologic determinants. Sur-
`gical technique, radiation therapy delivery, and criteria for watchful
`waiting continue to be refined and improved; the year treatment was
`given affects outcomes independent of other factors. The improve-
`ments make treatment decisions a dynamic process.
`The frequency of adverse events for the different modalities i5
`highly variable. Of greatest concern to patients are the effects on COR‘
`tinence, sexual potency. and bowel function. Part of the variability
`relates to the definition used for a specific complication and whethef
`the patient or physician is reporting the event. Incontinence figures
`range from 2% to 47% and impotence rates range from 25% to 89%
`following radical prostatectomy. The time of the assessment is 3150
`important. After surgery, impotence is immediate but may reverse 0V6’
`time, while with radiation therapy, impotence is not immediate but
`may develop over time.
`
`Radical Retropuhic Prostatectorag (RR?) The goal of radical prostateC'
`tomy is to excise the cancer completely with a clear margin, to main’
`tain continence by preserving the external sphincter, and to preser‘/5
`potency by sparing the autonomic nerves in the neurovascular bundle-
`RRP is advised for patients with a life expectancy of >10 years and
`is performed using a retropubic, perineal, or laparoscopic approach-
`
`WCK1009
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`WCK1009
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Outcomes can be predicted using postoperative nomograms that con-
`ider pretreatment factors and the pathologic findings at surgery. PSA
`imlure is defined as a detectable value of 0.2 or 0.4 ng/mL, although
`the exact definition varies among series. The techniques continue to
`improve as the 30111!)/' to localize the tumor within or beyond the pros-
`we are refined with different biopsy algorithms-and with imaging. The
`resuu is better case selection and surgical planning, which in turn have
`led to more rapid recovery and higher rates of continence and potency.
`Factors associated with incontinence include older age, shorter urethra
`length, surgical technique, preservation of neurovascular bundles, and
`development of an anastomotic stricture. Surgical experience is also a
`factor. In one series, 6% of patients had mild stress urinary inconti-
`Hence (SUI) (requiring 1 pad/day), 2% moderate SUI (>1 pad/day),
`and 0.3% severe SUI (requiring an artificial urinary sphincter). At 1
`Year, 92% were completely continent. In contrast, the results in a Med-
`icare population treated at multiple centers showed that at 3, 12, and
`24 months following surgery, 58, 35, and 42% wore pads in their
`underwear, and 24, 11, and 15% reported “a lot” of urine leakage.
`Factors associated with recovery of erectile function include younger
`age, quality erections before surgery, and the absence of damage to
`the neurovascular bundles. Erectile function returns in a median of 4
`to 6 months if both bundles are preserved. Potency is reduced by half
`if at least one nerve bundle is sacrificed. In cases where cancer control
`requires the removal of both bundles, sural nerve grafts are being ex-
`plored. Overall, with the availability of drugs such as sildenafil, in-
`traurethral inserts of alprostadil, and intracavernosal injections of va-
`sodilators, many patients recover satisfactory sexual function.
`High—risk patients are those with a predicted high probability of
`failure with surgery alone based on pretreatment factors. In these sit-
`uations, nomograms and predictive models can only go so far. Exactly
`what probability of success or failure would lead a physiciah to rec-
`ommend and a patient to seek alternative approaches is controversial.
`For example, it may be appropriate to recommend radical surgery for
`a younger patient with a low probability of cure. To improve the out-
`comes of surgery for high-risk patiehts, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy
`has been explored. The results of several large trials testing 3 or 8
`months of androgen ablation before surgery showed that serum PSA
`levels decreased by 96%, prostate volumes reduced by 34%, and mar-
`gin positivity rates declined from 41 to 17%. Unfortunately, hormones
`did not produce an improvement in PSA relapse—free survival. Thus,
`neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is not recommended.
`
`Radiation Therapy Radiation therapy is given by external beam, the
`implantation of radioactive sources into the gland, or a combination
`Of both. Contemporary external beam radiation techniques now use
`three—dimensional conformal treatment plans to maximize the admin-
`istered dose to the tumor and to minimize the exposure of the sur-
`rounding normal structures. The addition of intensity modulation
`(IMRT) has allowed further shaping of the isodose curves and the
`delivery of higher doses to the tumor and a further reduction in normal
`Ilssue exposure. These advances have allowed the safe administration
`Of doses >80 Gy, higher local control rates, and fewer side effects.
`Overall, radiation therapy is associated with a higher frequency of
`b0Wel complications (mainly diarrhea) than surgery. Measures of can-
`Cel‘ control include the proportion of patients who show a decline in
`PSA t0 <0.5 or 1 ng/mL, the proportion with “nonrising” PSA values,
`“H116 proportion with a negative biopsy of the prostate 2 years after
`°_°f11pletion of treatment. PSA relapse is defined as three consecutive
`“W13 PSA values from the nadir value, with the time to failure as the
`mldpoint between the nadir and first rising value.
`Radiation dose is important. A PSA nadir of <1.0 ng/mL was
`gbsefvecl in 90% of patients receiving 75.6 or 81.0 Gy vs. 76 and 56%
`‘_’Y those receiving 70.2 Gy and 64.8 Gy, respectively. The positive
`‘°PSy rates at 2.5 years were 4% for those treated with 81 Gy, vs. 36
`and 27% for those receiving 70.2 or 75.6 Gy. The frequency of rectal
`fomlflications relates directly to the volume of the anterior rectal wall
`56°31‘/ing full-dose treatment. Grade 3 rectal or urinary toxicities were
`een in 2.1% of cases at a median dose of 75.6 Gy. Grade 3 urethral
`
`81 Hyperplastit and Malignant Diseases of the Prostate
`
`547
`
`strictures requiring dilatation developed in 1% of cases, all of who

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket