throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/
`
` by guest on November 14, 2016
`
`Letters to the Editor
`
`Is Dexamethasone a Better Partner for
`
`Abiraterone Than Prednisolone?
`
`I read with great interest the article by Auchus et al. [1] in which
`they comprehensively reviewed the use of prednisone with
`abiraterone acetate in the treatment of metastatic castration-
`resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Although prednisolone is the
`most commonly used corticosteroid with abiraterone in clinical
`trials and is the standard of care as recommended by current
`guidelines, two recent trials have shown better response rates
`and progression-free survival with dexamethasone compared
`with prednisolone. In the first trial, Lorente et al. [2] showed that
`durable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses might be
`achieved with a switch from prednisolone to dexamethasone
`(0.5 mg/day) in patients progressing on abiraterone. In patients
`with CRPC and progressive disease with abiraterone-prednisolone,
`11 of 30 patients (39%) had confirmed $30% PSA decline after
`switching to dexamethasone with median time to PSA progression
`of 11.7 weeks. These results are comparable with the response
`rate (41%) and duration (2.8 months) with enzalutamide after
`abiraterone in CRPC treatment [3].
`The second trial
`is a randomized phase 2 trial that
`compared the efficacy of prednisolone (5 mg b.i.d.) and
`dexamethasone (0.5 mg/day) in chemotherapy-na¨ıve patients
`with CRPC. In evaluable patients, the PSA response rates
`were 47% versus 24% for dexamethasone and prednisolone,
`respectively (p 5 .05). Median time to PSA progression was 9.7
`months on dexamethasone versus 5.1 months on prednisolone
`(hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9–2.8). Among
`patients who crossed over at PSA progression on prednisolone,
`37% had a confirmed PSA response to dexamethasone [4].
`Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between
`dexamethasone and prednisolone might partially explain this
`phenomenon. The half-life of dexamethasone is longer, which
`may result in more effective suppression of adrenocorticotro-
`pic hormone and more proficient antitumoral activity. Second,
`abiraterone inhibits CYP 3A4, decreases the clearance, and
`further increases the half-life of dexamethasone, whereas
`prednisolone is usually not affected [5]. On the other hand,
`
`differences in the activity of synthetic glucocorticoids at the
`glucocorticoid receptor level might also cause alterations in
`efficacy [6].
`In conclusion, dexamethasone may be a better partner
`for abiraterone compared with prednisolone. Upfront use
`of dexamethasone with abiraterone or a switch from pre-
`dnisolone to dexamethasone at PSA progression might
`be feasible options and are currently being tested in larger
`trials (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01867710, Abiraterone With
`Different Steroid Regimens for Side Effect Related to
`Mineralcorticoid Excess Prevention in Prostate Cancer Prior
`to Chemotherapy).
`
`OMER DIZDAR
`
`Department of Preventive Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer
`Institute, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
`
`Disclosures
`
`The author indicated no financial relationships.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Auchus RJ, Yu MK, Nguyen S et al. Use of prednisone with abiraterone
`acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.The Oncologist 2014;
`19:1231–1240.
`
`2. Lorente D, Omlin A, Ferraldeschi R et al. Tumour responses following
`a steroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone in castration-resistant
`prostate cancer patients progressing on abiraterone. Br J Cancer 2014;111:
`2248–2253.
`
`3. Bianchini D, Lorente D, Rodriguez-Vida A et al. Antitumour activity of
`enzalutamide (MDV3100) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant
`prostate cancer (CRPC) pre-treated with docetaxel and abiraterone. Eur J
`Cancer 2014;50:78–84.
`
`4. Venkitaraman R, Lorente D, Murthy V et al. A randomised phase 2 trial of
`dexamethasone versus prednisolone in castration-resistant prostate cancer.
`Eur Urol 2015;67:673–679.
`
`5. Czock D, Keller F, Rasche FM et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacody-
`namics of systemically administered glucocorticoids. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005;
`44:61–98.
`
`6. Diederich S, Scholz T, Eigendorff E et al. Pharmacodynamics and
`pharmacokinetics of synthetic mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids: Re-
`ceptor transactivation and prereceptor metabolism by 11beta-hydroxysteroid-
`dehydrogenases. Horm Metab Res 2004;36:423–429.
`
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0472
`
`The Oncologist 2015;20:e13 www.TheOncologist.com
`
`©AlphaMed Press 2015
`
`Amerigen Exhibit 1131
`Amerigen v. Janssen IPR2016-00286
`
`1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket