throbber
Making the discoveries that defeat cancer
`
`Donate now
`
`Home
`
`News
`
`Latest features
`
`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and commercial partnership
`
`
`
`11
`
`MAY
`2014
`
`Abiraterone: a story of scientific
`innovation and commercial
`partnership
`
`Abiraterone is one of the ICR’s biggest success stories – the first treatment shown to be
`effective in men with advanced prostate cancer. In 2012 it was made available on the NHS, at
`a stroke transforming the options available for the 10,000 men each year diagnosed with
`aggressive forms of prostate cancer. In the current financial year alone, abiraterone is forecast
`to earn the ICR £10m in royalties, all of which will be ploughed back into our research.
`
`But the road from abiraterone’s initial concept to today’s life-extending treatment was not
`always smooth and highlights the importance of maintaining focus on a critical stage in the
`ICR’s work – the commercialisation of the cancer drugs we discover. Without
`commercialisation, we would fail in an essential part of the ICR’s mission, in delivering new
`cancer treatments to patients.
`
`This article details the key stages in abiraterone’s almost 20-year history from initial idea to
`cancer drug in the clinic. It draws out some of the key learning points from its discovery and
`development, so that the ICR can not only reproduce the success of abiraterone, but can
`speed the journey from our next major discovery to the clinic.
`
`The initial idea
`
`Abiraterone’s journey began in the 1990s, when a team of ICR scientists began to look for
`ways of shutting off production of male androgen sex hormones. Prostate cancer relies on
`testosterone to grow, so one of the main ways doctors treat the disease is by blocking its
`action. Over time most patients’ cancers stop responding to standard hormone treatments and
`many scientists believed the cancers had learned how to grow without testosterone. The ICR’s
`Professor Mike Jarman, and colleagues Dr Elaine Barrie and Professor Gerry Potter, began
`investigating an alternative theory – that these prostate cancers were using testosterone from
`
`WCK1102
`Wockhardt Bio AG v. Janssen Oncology, Inc.
`IPR2016-01582
`
`

`

`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and commercial partnership - The Institute of Cancer Research, London
`
`elsewhere in body to grow, and might therefore still be treated by disrupting testosterone
`synthesis.
`
`The team, working in what is now the Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, started
`with a drug called ketoconazole, which they noticed prevented the growth of prostate cancer
`cells. The drug worked by inhibiting an enzyme called CYP17, which is important in the
`production of male sex hormones. Ketoconazole proved to be not very potent, not sufficiently
`specific and quickly broken down by the body, so the team set out to design new more
`effective inhibitors of the CYP17 enzyme.
`
`Dr Barrie assessed compounds made within Professor Jarman’s team to work out how
`successfully and selectively they would inhibit CYP17. They were aided by three-dimensional
`models created by Professor Stephen Neidle, Dr Charles Laughton and colleagues.
`
`The search was rewarded when Professor Potter and Dr Barrie designed and evaluated a
`chemical called CB7598, which they called abiraterone. The drug specifically and irreversibly
`blocked CYP17, and prevented testosterone being made anywhere in the body.
`
`Patenting and early commercialisation
`
`The ICR team filed the first of its patents on abiraterone in 1992, on the usefulness of the
`compound as a potential cancer treatment, and followed that with a second patent the
`following year covering its synthesis. A year later the team published the first paper describing
`the drug, its rationale as a cancer treatment and how it was synthesised.
`
`The decision to patent and its timing were key to the abiraterone success story, and opened
`the door to the drug’s commercialisation. The ICR assigned rights for the development of
`abiraterone to British Technology Group, an international specialist healthcare company.
`Jennifer Hodgson, Business Development Manager in the ICR’s Enterprise Unit, explains: “The
`critical step in commercialisation of abiraterone was the filing of the two patents from this initial
`research. A key role for the ICR’s Enterprise Unit is in deciding when to file a patent. Patents
`only last for 20 years. If we file too early we reduce the number of years we can receive
`royalties because it takes a while for commercialisation to occur. It is because of these initial
`patents that we are now entitled to royalties from abiraterone. Protecting our intellectual
`property for licensing is one of the most important roles of the Enterprise Unit and we
`encourage researchers doing work with commercial implications to get in touch at an early
`stage.”
`
`Early studies
`
`The next step for the ICR team was to turn the chemical they had designed into a medicine
`that could be taken by patients. Professor Mitch Dowsett, Dr Barrie and others showed in
`animal and cancer cell models that the drug worked as expected, blocking synthesis of
`androgens and reducing their levels in the body and the size of androgen-dependent organs.
`
`http://www.icr.ac.uk/news-features/latest-features/abiraterone-a-story-of-scientific-innovation-and-commercial-partnership[4/19/2017 3:30:42 PM]
`
`2
`
`

`

`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and commercial partnership - The Institute of Cancer Research, London
`
`These and other early studies were important as they demonstrated the drug was safe,
`effective and ready to be evaluated in patients. Professor Potter and Dr Ian Hardcastle then
`scaled up the small amounts of the drug used in the lab into a quantity and purity suitable for
`patient use.
`
`In 1996 BTG out-licensed abiraterone to the German pharmaceutical company Boehringer
`Ingelheim, and initial Phase I clinical trials began. Early-stage clinical trials in prostate cancer
`led by Professor Ian Judson, with pharmacodynamic studies carried out by Dr Florence
`Raynaud, showed that abiraterone did hit the correct target and lower levels of male
`hormones. However, early in the drug’s development concerns were raised about the possible
`side-effects of blocking CYP17 – in particular about the risk of adrenal insufficiency, a
`potentially life-threatening complication. The developmental progress was further hampered by
`a lack of interest in hormone treatments for prostate cancer. Part of the problem lay in the
`name of late-stage prostate cancer, which was often referred to as ‘refractory’ disease,
`implying the cancer became resistant to androgens and could progress without them. Many
`scientists and clinicians argued that blocking androgen production at this late stage would be
`ineffective. These concerns led to Boehringer withdrawing from the development of
`abiraterone, with the licence returning to BCG.
`
`But the scepticism surrounding the drug was challenged when Professor Johann de
`Bono joined the ICR from San Antonio, Texas, in 2003. Professor de Bono recognised the
`potential of abiraterone as a treatment for men with advanced prostate cancer, and reasoned
`that late-stage prostate cancer was not ‘hormone refractory’ but ‘castration resistant’, meaning
`that the tumour was still dependent on testosterone but was able to progress because it could
`get androgens from elsewhere – perhaps even from the prostate cancer itself. He also
`reasoned that adrendal insufficiency would not be an issue with abiraterone, since children
`born with inherited deficiency of CYP17 do not suffer from it. The ICR was ready to take
`abiraterone back into clinical trials.
`
`Licensing and clinical trials
`
`In 2004, BTG licensed abiraterone to Ortho Biotech Oncology Research and Development, a
`unit of Cougar Biotechnology Inc., granting worldwide exclusive rights to develop and
`commercialise abiraterone. In doing so the ICR gained the financial backing it needed to run
`the clinical trials now required to prove the drug’s efficacy and safety.
`
`“Licensing is a critical step in the commercialisation process,” explains Toby Richardson,
`Senior Business Development Manager in the Enterprise Unit. “Licensing gives a company
`permission to own our property. Our number one goal is to ensure patients benefit as quickly
`as possible from our innovations. The Enterprise Unit has good links with a range of
`companies and has cover 40 years of collective experience and expertise in negotiating.
`Collaborations can take a long time but the ICR has strong record of success.
`
`“The ICR has the highest amount of invention income per faculty head in the UK – more than
`
`http://www.icr.ac.uk/news-features/latest-features/abiraterone-a-story-of-scientific-innovation-and-commercial-partnership[4/19/2017 3:30:42 PM]
`
`3
`
`

`

`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and commercial partnership - The Institute of Cancer Research, London
`
`twice the organisation in second place. But it’s not only the ICR who benefits. The Rewards for
`Innovators Scheme means that the researchers involved in the development of abiraterone are
`also entitled to a share of the royalties.
`
`With support from Cougar, Professor de Bono, Dr Gert Attard and colleagues began phase I
`clinical trials to test abiraterone’s safety and anti-tumour activity.
`
`The first phase I study of abiraterone in patients with advanced prostate cancer was run by the
`ICR and The Royal Marsden. The small study involved 21 men and found that the drug
`appeared safe in humans and that the majority of patients who took it experienced both
`significant tumour shrinkage and dramatic falls in PSA levels.
`
`Less than a year later, the results of a larger phase I/II study were reported. This study of 54
`patients confirmed the phase I results, and showed that up to 70 per cent of men responded
`to abiraterone. These men experienced significant benefits for an average of eight months,
`with scans showing their tumours decreased in size and their PSA levels dropped
`substantially.
`
`Following these very positive results, the giant US pharmaceutical company Johnson &
`Johnson agreed to buy Cougar for just under £600million, gaining access to the drug as it
`progressed through phase III evaluation. And in 2010, a pivotal phase III trial showed that
`patients given abiraterone lived on average 15.8 months longer, compared with 11.2 months
`for men taking a placebo. This part of abiraterone’s story is an exemplar of how basic
`molecular studies, followed by collaborations between researchers, doctors and industry, can
`lead to the successful development of effective drugs that can transform lives.
`
`http://www.icr.ac.uk/news-features/latest-features/abiraterone-a-story-of-scientific-innovation-and-commercial-partnership[4/19/2017 3:30:42 PM]
`
`4
`
`

`

`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and commercial partnership - The Institute of Cancer Research, London
`
`Approval and acceptance by NICE
`
`There was now strong clinical trial evidence for the effectiveness of abiraterone, but there
`remained some significant hurdles in gaining regulatory approval for the drug. The ICR had to
`play an active role in the regulatory process to make sure abiraterone was made available to
`as many patients as possible.
`
`The first step was the submission to a new drug application to the US Food and Drug
`Administration, leading to the approval of abiraterone in the US.
`
`Hodgson says: “Approval in the US was a significant step in abiraterone’s development. Both
`the ICR and BTG received a milestone payment, together with the royalties that followed on
`worldwide sales of abiraterone.”
`
`Later in 2011, the European Medicines Authority also licensed abiraterone. That opened the
`door to the drug being made available in the UK, but accessing it on the NHS continued to rely
`on local decisions by primary care trusts, or access via the Government’s new NHS Cancer
`Drugs Fund. Abiraterone became one of the most requested drugs on the Cancer Drugs Fund,
`as anticipation grew that it would shortly be accepted by NICE.
`
`However, in February 2012, NICE announced that it was minded to reject abiraterone on cost
`grounds unless more data were forthcoming or a better price was offered. The decision came
`as a significant blow to the ICR and to men with prostate cancer across the UK. We
`responded to the NICE appraisal consultation document highlighting our concerns about
`certain aspects of the process underling the NICE decision, and asking it to reconsider its
`position. The ICR called for NICE to re-examine fully the potential for abiraterone to be cost-
`effective in a subgroup of patients for whom it appeared to be particularly effective, and to
`follow its own ‘end-of-life criteria’ for deciding whether drugs should be made available.
`
`The end-of-life criteria are more lenient guidelines, developed by NICE, which should be
`followed when reviewing treatments which may extend the lives of patients who are terminally
`ill. The guidelines cover drugs which would normally be deemed too expensive for standard
`NHS use and which are licensed for a terminal illness affecting a small number of patients with
`less than two years to live. Cancer Research UK estimated 7,000 men would be eligible for
`abiraterone and thought this number low enough for the drug to be assessed under the end-
`of-life guidance.
`
`In May 2012, NICE and Janssen finally reached an agreement over cost, and the drug was
`made available on the NHS in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Since then, abiraterone
`has gained a further licence for the treatment of prostate cancer before chemotherapy,
`opening up the prospect that it will be made available for even more men.
`
`The path from abiraterone’s discovery to its commercialisation was long and winding, but it
`was ultimately a major success story for the ICR demonstrating how partnership with industry
`
`http://www.icr.ac.uk/news-features/latest-features/abiraterone-a-story-of-scientific-innovation-and-commercial-partnership[4/19/2017 3:30:42 PM]
`
`5
`
`

`

`Abiraterone: a story of scientific innovation and commercial partnership - The Institute of Cancer Research, London
`
`can deliver real benefits for patients.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`http://www.icr.ac.uk/news-features/latest-features/abiraterone-a-story-of-scientific-innovation-and-commercial-partnership[4/19/2017 3:50:13 PM]
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket