throbber
Update
`
`Metformin: An Update
`
`Dmitri Kirpichnikov, MD; Samy I. McFarlane, MD; and James R. Sowers, MD
`
`Metformin is an insulin-sensitizing agent with potent antihyper-
`glycemic properties.
`Its efficacy in reducing hyperglycemia in
`type 2 diabetes mellitus is similar to that of sulfonylureas, thia-
`zolidinediones, and insulin. Metformin-based combination therapy
`is often superior to therapy with a single hypoglycemic agent. The
`antihyperglycemic properties of metformin are mainly attributed to
`suppressed hepatic glucose production, especially hepatic glu-
`coneogenesis, and increased peripheral tissue insulin sensitivity.
`
`Although the precise mechanism of hypoglycemic action of met-
`formin remains unclear, it probably interrupts mitochondrial oxi-
`dative processes in the liver and corrects abnormalities of intra-
`cellular calcium metabolism in insulin-sensitive tissues (liver,
`skeletal muscle, and adipocytes) and cardiovascular tissue.
`
`Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:25-33.
`For author affiliations, see end of text.
`
`www.annals.org
`
`Insulin resistance contributes greatly to development of
`
`cardiovascular disease in patients with the metabolic syn-
`drome and its extreme presentation, type 2 diabetes melli-
`tus. Therefore, treatment with an insulin-sensitizing agent,
`such as metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes melli-
`tus may correct several of the primary pathophysiologic
`abnormalities of the metabolic syndrome. In diabetic pa-
`tients, metformin appears to provide cardiovascular protec-
`tion that cannot be attributed only to its antihyperglycemic
`effects. These additional cardioprotective effects in these
`patients may be related to the favorable actions of met-
`formin on lipid metabolism, vascular smooth-muscle and
`cardiomyocyte intracellular calcium handling, endothelial
`function, hypercoagulation, and platelet hyperactivity. We
`discuss known mechanisms by which metformin exerts its
`beneficial glycemic and cardiovascular actions.
`
`CLINICAL ROLE OF METFORMIN
`Metformin, an insulin-sensitizing biguanide used to
`treat type 2 diabetes, has been shown to be as effective as
`insulin or sulfonylureas when used as monotherapy (1–5).
`In conjunction with diet, metformin reduces fasting glu-
`cose concentration by 2.78 to 3.90 mmol/L (50 to 70
`mg/dL), which corresponds to a 1.3% to 2.0% reduction
`in hemoglobin A1c values (1, 2, 4, 6 – 8). The magnitude of
`plasma glucose reduction is related to pretreatment glucose
`levels (7, 9). The efficacy of metformin monotherapy has
`been shown to be independent of age, body weight, eth-
`nicity, duration of diabetes, and insulin and C-peptide lev-
`els (1, 2).
`Metformin may have special benefits in overweight
`patients with type 2 diabetes. Unlike sulfonylureas, insulin,
`and thiazolidinediones, metformin does not affect body
`mass index (1) or decreases body weight in obese patients
`with (4, 10) and without (11, 12) diabetes. Significant
`reductions in total body fat and visceral fat have been ob-
`served in women with preexistent abdominal or visceral
`obesity who are treated with metformin (11). Excessive fat
`localized to the paraintestinal region is a major contributor
`to the pathogenesis of the cardiovascular metabolic syn-
`drome (13, 14), and the reduction in visceral fat (second-
`
`ary to weight loss or fat redistribution) may have additional
`cardiovascular benefits in insulin-resistant persons treated
`with metformin (13, 14). Weight loss during metformin
`treatment has been attributed to decreased net caloric in-
`take (15), probably through appetite suppression, an effect
`that is largely independent of gastrointestinal side effects of
`metformin (such as nausea and diarrhea) (10). Reduction
`in hyperinsulinemia related to reduced insulin resistance
`may have an additive effect on weight reduction in obese
`insulin-resistant persons (13, 14).
`At doses of 500 to 1500 mg, metformin has an abso-
`lute oral bioavailability of 50% to 60% (16). The drug is
`not protein bound and therefore has a wide volume of
`distribution (8), with maximal accumulation in the small-
`intestine wall (17). Metformin undergoes no modifications
`in the body and is secreted unchanged by rapid kidney
`excretion (through glomerular filtration and, possibly, tu-
`bular secretion) (8). Impaired kidney function slows elim-
`ination and may cause metformin accumulation (18). The
`H2-blocker cimetidine competitively inhibits renal tubular
`secretion of metformin, significantly decreasing its clear-
`ance and increasing its bioavailability (16, 19).
`
`METFORMIN AS A PART OF COMBINATION THERAPY
`Metformin has been shown to be effective in combi-
`nation with insulin, sulfonylureas (2, 10, 20, 21), and thia-
`zolidinediones (22). This finding is important because
`single-drug therapy often fails to maintain normoglycemia,
`particularly as diabetes progresses (23, 24). As seen in the
`United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS),
`50% of patients treated with diet or a single antidiabetic
`drug achieved the target hemoglobin A1c value of less than
`7% after 3 years of follow-up; after 9 years, only 25%
`maintained this goal (24). As diabetes progresses and treat-
`ment with maximal doses of sulfonylurea fails, addition of
`metformin significantly improves glycemic control (2). In
`the UKPDS trial, combination therapy tended to control
`glycemia more effectively than monotherapy (hemoglobin
`A1c value, 0.075 [7.5%] versus 0.081 [8.1%]) (23).
`© 2002 American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine E-25
`
`Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Reprints Desk User on 07/06/2015
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1015, Page 1
`
`

`
`Update Metformin: An Update
`
`PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN METFORMIN THERAPY
`The ideal patient for initiation of metformin treatment
`would be an obese person with type 2 diabetes mellitus who
`has normal kidney function (creatinine concentration ⬍133
`␮m d/L [⬍1.5 mg/dL] in men and ⬍124 ␮m d/L in women,
`or creatinine clearance ⬎1.17 mL/s without coexistent symp-
`tomatic congestive heart failure or a hypoxic respiratory con-
`dition) (9, 16, 25). Contraindications to metformin therapy
`are liver failure, alcoholism, and active moderate to severe in-
`fection (9, 25); these conditions predispose to development of
`lactic acidosis, either by increased production or decreased
`metabolism of lactic acid (9, 16–18, 25). Administration of
`radiocontrast material to a patient with diabetes may worsen
`already-compromised kidney function and cause accumula-
`tion of metformin, leading to toxic levels of drug. Further-
`more, administration of general anesthesia may cause hypo-
`tension, which leads to renal hypoperfusion and peripheral
`tissue hypoxia with subsequent lactate accumulation (25–28).
`Therefore, if administration of radiocontrast material is re-
`quired or urgent surgery is needed, metformin should be
`withheld and hydration maintained until preserved kidney
`function is documented at 24 and 48 hours after the interven-
`tion (9, 26–28). Metformin should be used with caution in
`elderly patients, whose reduced lean body mass may lead to
`misleading low creatinine concentrations that fail to reflect
`decreased glomerular filtration rates (9, 25–28).
`Metformin therapy should be initiated with a single
`dose of medication (usually 500 mg) taken with the pa-
`tient’s largest meal to prevent gastrointestinal symptoms.
`Gastrointestinal symptoms generally disappear within 2
`weeks of treatment (10, 11). Medication doses may be
`increased by 500-mg increments every 1 to 2 weeks, as
`indicated by glycemic control, until a desirable blood glu-
`cose level or the maximal recommended daily metformin
`dose of 2550 mg is reached (2, 25). The hypoglycemic
`effect of metformin is dose related, and a plateau of hypo-
`glycemic action is achieved at a daily dose of 2000 mg (6).
`Side effects of metformin are mostly limited to diges-
`tive tract symptoms, such as diarrhea, flatulence, and ab-
`dominal discomfort (1, 6, 8 –10). These symptoms are
`dose dependent and can usually be avoided by slow titra-
`tion and, in some cases, reduction of the dose (9). About
`5% of patients cannot tolerate treatment because of gastro-
`intestinal side effects (6, 9, 10). The mechanisms of these
`gastrointestinal side effects remain unclear but probably are
`related to accumulation of high amounts of metformin in
`the intestinal tissue (17), with subsequent elevation of local
`lactate production. Histologic examination has not re-
`vealed changes in the intestinal mucosa in metformin-
`treated animals (29), indicating a functional rather than a
`structural basis for gastrointestinal symptoms. Ten percent
`to 30% of patients receiving long-term metformin therapy
`develop vitamin B12 malabsorption, as indicated by de-
`creased concentrations of total vitamin B12 and its bioavail-
`able form, holotranscobalamin (2, 30). Metformin inter-
`
`E-26 2 July 2002 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 137 • Number 1
`
`feres with mucosal-cell intracellular calcium handling, thus
`disrupting calcium-dependent absorption of vitamin B12 in
`the ileum (30). Such decreases in vitamin B12 levels rarely
`have clinical significance (2, 9).
`Development of hypoglycemia during metformin
`monotherapy is rare because metformin only partially sup-
`presses gluconeogenesis in the liver and does not stimulate
`insulin production (9, 31).
`Lactic acidosis is a life-threatening complication of bigua-
`nide therapy that carries a mortality rate of 30% to 50% (28).
`Metformin therapy may increase blood lactate levels (1) and is
`occasionally associated with development of lactic acidosis (2,
`28). The estimated incidence of metformin-associated lactic
`acidosis is 0.03 cases per 1000 patient-years (25), which is 10
`to 20 times lower than that seen with phenformin therapy
`(28). Development of lactic acidosis appears to be unrelated to
`plasma metformin concentrations (28), and even in persons
`with chronic renal
`insufficiency, metformin accumulation
`does not necessarily lead to lactic acidosis (18). Development
`of lactic acidosis is almost always related to coexistent hypoxic
`conditions that are probably responsible for the associated
`high mortality rate. In one report, 91% of patients who de-
`veloped lactic acidosis while being treated with metformin had
`a predisposing condition, such as congestive heart failure, re-
`nal insufficiency, chronic lung disease with hypoxia, or age
`older than 80 years (26). Thus, patients with compromised
`renal function or coexistent hypoxic conditions should not be
`given metformin. Chronic or acute intake of large amounts of
`alcohol may potentiate the effect of metformin on lactate me-
`tabolism. A careful history of alcohol use is therefore impor-
`tant before starting metformin therapy (26, 27).
`
`MECHANISMS OF ANTIHYPERGLYCEMIC ACTION OF
`METFORMIN
`The glucose-lowering effects of metformin are mainly a
`consequence of reduced hepatic glucose output (primarily
`through inhibition of gluconeogenesis and, to a lesser extent,
`glycogenolysis) and increased insulin-stimulated glucose up-
`take in skeletal muscle and adipocytes (25, 27, 31–35) (Figure
`1). Its major mode of action is to reduce hepatic glucose pro-
`duction, which is increased at least twofold in patients with
`type 2 diabetes (32, 36). In a recent study of the mechanism
`by which metformin decreases endogenous glucose produc-
`tion in patients with type 2 diabetes, the increased plasma
`glucose level was attributed to a threefold increase in the rate
`of gluconeogenesis, as assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance
`spectroscopy (32). Metformin treatment decreased fasting
`plasma glucose concentrations by 25% to 30% and reduced
`glucose production (32), findings that are consistent with
`those of other investigators (27, 35). The decrease in glucose
`production was attributable to a reduction in the rate of glu-
`coneogenesis (32).
`Data from in vivo studies (27, 32, 36) are consistent with
`those of in vitro studies demonstrating an inhibitory effect of
`metformin on gluconeogenesis (37, 38) (Figure 1). For exam-
`
`www.annals.org
`
`Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Reprints Desk User on 07/06/2015
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1015, Page 2
`
`

`
`ple, metformin was observed to decrease gluconeogenesis in
`perfused liver, primarily through inhibition of hepatic lactate
`uptake (37). Others reported that metformin therapy de-
`creased concentrations of adenosine triphosphate in isolated
`rat hepatocytes (38). Because adenosine triphosphate is an
`allosteric inhibitor of pyruvate kinase, the investigators sug-
`gested that the metformin-mediated reduction in hepatic glu-
`cose production resulted from increased pyruvate kinase flux.
`Metformin also decreases gluconeogenic flux through inhibi-
`tion of pyruvate carboxylase–phosphoenolpyruvate carboxyki-
`nase activity and possibly through increased conversion of
`pyruvate to alanine (34). Metformin also facilitates insulin-
`induced suppression of gluconeogenesis from several sub-
`stances, including lactate, pyruvate, glycerol, and amino acids
`(31), and opposes the gluconeogenic actions of glucagon (39)
`(Figure 1).
`The exact mechanism through which metformin re-
`duces hepatic glucose production remains unclear, but its
`primary site of action appears to be hepatocyte mitochon-
`dria, where it disrupts respiratory chain oxidation of com-
`plex I substrates (for example, glutamate) (15, 39). Inhibi-
`tion of cellular respiration decreases gluconeogenesis (39)
`and may induce expression of glucose transporters and,
`therefore, glucose utilization (40). It is not clear whether
`metformin acts on mitochondrial respiration directly by
`slow permeation across the inner mitochondrial membrane
`(39) or by unidentified cell-signaling pathways (15). It has
`been suggested that biguanides bind specifically and com-
`petitively to divalent cation sites on proteins, thus interfer-
`ing with intracellular handling of calcium ([Ca2⫹]i) (41,
`42) especially in the mitochondria (41). Davidoff and col-
`leagues (41) showed that even small doses of biguanides
`increase the rates of [Ca2⫹]i uptake in isolated hepatic
`mitochondria, where [Ca2⫹]i serves as a potent activator of
`respiration (Figure 1). This effect was
`mitochondrial
`shown at biguanide concentrations as low as 5 to 10 ␮m
`(41), levels that are expected in the liver with antihypergly-
`cemic doses of the drug and are 20- to 50-fold lower than
`those that inhibit mitochondrial respiration. In several tis-
`sues, including skeletal muscle and adipocytes, metformin
`facilitates trafficking of glucose transporters 4 and 1 to the
`plasma membrane (25, 31, 43). Moreover, metformin may
`increase the glucose transport capacity of glucose trans-
`porter 4, and to some extent, glucose transporters 1 (31).
`The effects of metformin on peripheral insulin-sensi-
`tive tissues require the presence of insulin for its full action.
`Metformin enhances most of the biological actions of in-
`sulin, including glucose transport and glycogen and lipid
`synthesis,
`in persons with preexisting insulin resistance
`(31). It facilitates glucose transport in cultured skeletal
`muscle in the absence of insulin (44, 45). Metformin acti-
`vates insulin and tyrosine kinase activity in insulin-like
`growth factor-1 receptor of vascular smooth-muscle cells
`independently of insulin action (46). The drug activates
`tyrosine kinase in Xenopus oocytes, with subsequent stim-
`ulation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate production and gly-
`
`www.annals.org
`
`Metformin: An Update
`
`Update
`
`Figure 1. Mechanisms of metformin action on hepatic glucose
`production and muscle glucose consumption.
`
`Metformin decreases hepatic gluconeogenesis by interfering with respi-
`ratory oxidation in mitochondria. It suppresses gluconeogenesis from
`several substrates, including lactate, pyruvate, glycerol, and amino acids.
`In addition, metformin increases intramitochondrial levels of calcium
`(Ca⫹⫹), a modulator of mitochondrial respiration. In insulin-sensitive
`tissues (such as skeletal muscle), metformin facilitates glucose transport
`by increasing tyrosine kinase activity in insulin receptors and enhancing
`glucose transporter (GLUT) trafficking to the cell membrane. ADP ⫽
`䢇䢇䢇; ATP ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; Ca⫹⫹ ⫽ intracellular calcium levels; OAA ⫽
`䢇䢇䢇; PEP ⫽ phosphoenolpyruvate; Pi ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; TK ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇.
`
`cogen synthesis (47) (Figure 1). Thus, metformin has met-
`abolic
`effects on insulin-sensitive
`tissues
`that may
`contribute to its glucose-lowering effect.
`Metformin has been shown to reduce free fatty acid
`oxidation by 10% to 30% (25, 31–33). Elevated levels of
`free fatty acid are commonly seen in diabetes and obesity
`(48), and they contribute to increased hepatic glucose pro-
`duction and development of insulin resistance (49, 54)
`(Figure 2). Increased fatty acid oxidation inhibits key en-
`zymes of the glycolytic pathway by accumulation of acetyl
`coenzyme A and citrate, by-products of free fatty acid ox-
`idation (51). Increased glucose 6-phosphate concentra-
`tions, in turn, inhibit the hexokinase enzyme, resulting in
`reduced glucose uptake and oxidation (51). In addition,
`free fatty acid independently inhibits insulin receptor sub-
`strate-1–associated PI3-kinase activity (52) and subse-
`quently attenuates transmembrane glucose transport (48)
`(Figure 2). By decreasing free fatty acid levels, metformin
`not only improves insulin sensitivity but may also help
`correct impaired insulin secretion by ␤-cells (53). Met-
`formin has no direct effect on ␤-cell function (9), but it
`can improve insulin secretion that has been altered by
`long-term exposure to free fatty acid or hyperglycemia
`(glucose toxicity) (53).
`Metformin may also improve hyperglycemia by attain-
`ing high concentrations in the small intestine (17, 31) and
`decreasing intestinal absorption of glucose (29, 54), an ac-
`tion that may contribute to decreased postprandial blood
`
`2 July 2002 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 137 • Number 1 E-27
`
`Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Reprints Desk User on 07/06/2015
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1015, Page 3
`
`

`
`Update Metformin: An Update
`
`Figure 2. Metformin and fatty acids.
`
`Metformin inhibits fatty acid (FA) production and oxidation, thereby reducing fatty acid–induced insulin resistance and hepatic glucose production.
`CoA ⫽ coenzyme A; CPT ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; FFA ⫽ free fatty acid; GLUT ⫽ glucose transporter; IGF-1 ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; IRS-1 ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; OAA ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; PDH ⫽
`䢇䢇䢇; PFK ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; PI-3 ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇.
`
`glucose levels (55). It has been speculated that increased
`glucose consumption in the small intestine of metformin-
`treated patients may prevent further glucose transport to
`the hepatic circulation (29).
`In summary, metformin decreases hepatic glucose pro-
`duction through inhibition of gluconeogenesis and possi-
`bly glycogenolysis and improves peripheral insulin sensitiv-
`ity.
`In addition, metformin decreases gastrointestinal
`glucose absorption and indirectly improves pancreatic
`␤-cell response to glucose by reducing glucose toxicity and
`free fatty acid levels.
`
`EFFECT OF METFORMIN IN THE POLYCYSTIC OVARY
`SYNDROME
`Hyperinsulinemia reflecting insulin resistance is a com-
`mon feature in lean and obese patients with the polycystic
`ovary syndrome (11, 56, 57). Hyperinsulinemia contributes
`directly to excessive testosterone production by the ovaries
`(56) and decreased synthesis of sex hormone–binding globu-
`lin in the liver (11, 58), thereby increasing levels of total and
`free testosterone. Metformin therapy increases insulin sensitiv-
`ity and decreases insulin levels in patients with the polycystic
`ovary syndrome (56, 57, 59). Improvement of hyperinsulin-
`emia is associated with decreased levels of total and free tes-
`tosterone (11, 12, 57, 59) and increased estradiol (12) levels.
`
`E-28 2 July 2002 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 137 • Number 1
`
`Clinically, administration of metformin improves hirsutism
`(11), normalizes menstrual cycles (11, 12, 57, 59), and in-
`duces ovulation (57, 59) in a substantial number of patients
`with the polycystic ovary syndrome.
`
`EFFECT OF METFORMIN TREATMENT ON
`CARDIOVASCULAR MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY
`In the UKPDS 34, metformin therapy was compared
`with conventional treatment or treatment with sulfonyl-
`urea or insulin (5). In this trial, which was designed to
`achieve fasting plasma glucose levels less than 6 mmol/L
`(⬍108 mg/dL), 342 patients with newly diagnosed type 2
`diabetes were allocated to receive metformin treatment and
`951 patients were allocated to receive either chlorpropam-
`ide, glibenclamide, or insulin. The control group included
`411 overweight diabetic patients who were randomly as-
`signed to conventional therapy, primarily with diet alone,
`which resulted in suboptimal glycemic control. During 10
`years of
`follow-up, both drug-treated groups achieved
`equal degrees of glycemic control (median hemoglobin A1c
`value of 0.074 [7.4%]), whereas the conventionally treated
`group had a median hemoglobin A1c value of 0.08 (8.0%)
`(5). Compared with the conventionally treated group,
`metformin-treated patients had a risk reduction of 32%
`any diabetes-related end point, 39% for myocardial infarc-
`
`www.annals.org
`
`Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Reprints Desk User on 07/06/2015
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1015, Page 4
`
`

`
`tion, 42% for diabetes-related death, and 36% for all-cause
`mortality (5). These differences may be partially explained
`by differences in the degree of glycemic control between
`the metformin and diet groups. In the UKPDS 35 (60),
`the risk for cardiovascular events, stroke, and all-cause
`death was closely related to the degree of glycemia in dia-
`betic patients. In that study, each 1% reduction in the
`hemoglobin A1c value during treatment of type 2 diabetes
`was associated with a reduction of 21% in diabetes-related
`deaths, 14% in the incidence of myocardial infarction,
`12% in fatal and nonfatal strokes, and 16% in heart failure
`(60). Nevertheless, metformin was more effective than sul-
`fonylureas or insulin in reducing rates of any diabetes-
`related end point, all-cause mortality, and stroke, even
`though both agents decreased hemoglobin A1c values
`equally (5). These observations suggest that metformin
`might have additional cardiovascular protective actions be-
`yond its antihyperglycemic properties. However, data indi-
`cate that metformin in combination with sulfonylurea
`might increase cardiovascular mortality in patients with
`type 2 diabetes (5, 61). In those studies, metformin was
`not used as an initial therapy but rather was added to
`treatment when sulfonylurea therapy failed. Patients taking
`combination therapy with metformin and sulfonylurea
`tended to have long-standing poorly controlled diabetes
`before addition of the biguanide (62). Moreover, they had
`greater obesity (61), which could independently increase
`mortality. Therefore, the reported increase in risk for car-
`diovascular disease in patients treated with combination
`therapy might reflect selection bias attributable to the natural
`history of long-standing diabetes rather than to adverse effects
`of this combination.
`
`MECHANISM OF THE CARDIOPROTECTIVE ACTION OF
`METFORMIN
`Insulin resistance, a cornerstone of type 2 diabetes and
`the metabolic cardiovascular syndrome, is commonly asso-
`ciated with hypertension, abdominal obesity, atherogenic
`dyslipidemia, and vascular dysfunction, all of which con-
`tribute greatly to the development of accelerated athero-
`sclerosis (63). Hyperinsulinemia reflects insulin resistance
`and may be an independent risk factor for coronary artery
`disease (64 – 66). Metformin, an insulin-sensitizing agent,
`decreases insulin resistance in patients with (20, 31, 55)
`and without (11, 12, 57, 67) diabetes, thus effectively re-
`ducing baseline and glucose-stimulated insulin levels (12,
`20, 55, 57, 67).
`Several studies have shown that metformin improves
`lipoprotein profiles in diabetic patients (2, 10, 20, 55, 68).
`Dyslipidemia in diabetes is characterized by hypertriglycer-
`idemia (increased levels of very low-density lipoprotein
`cholesterol); decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein
`cholesterol; and elevated levels of small, dense atherogenic
`low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) particles. The
`increased levels of free fatty acid that occur in obesity and
`
`www.annals.org
`
`Metformin: An Update
`
`Update
`
`poorly controlled diabetes (48) contribute not only to de-
`velopment of insulin insensitivity but also to increased syn-
`thesis and secretion of very low-density lipoprotein (69).
`Elevated triglyceride levels inhibit degradation of apopro-
`tein B in the liver and lead to increased assembly of very
`low-density lipoprotein and smaller, denser LDL particles
`(69). Excessive generation of reactive oxygen species and
`free radicals (such as peroxynitrates) by cardiovascular tis-
`sue, in combination with increased nonenzymatic glycation
`of
`lipoproteins (glycooxidation),
`leads to formation of
`atypical glycooxidized LDL particles. These particles bind
`poorly to classic LDL receptors but have high affinity for
`“scavenger” receptors, which are located predominantly on
`macrophages (63). Accumulation of glycooxidized small,
`dense LDL particles converts macrophages into foam cells,
`which are essential participants in the early steps of athero-
`sclerotic plaque formation (63). Compared with the gen-
`eral population, diabetic persons have a twofold to fourfold
`increased risk for cardiovascular disease at any cholesterol
`level (70), which indicates a more aggressive type of dys-
`lipidemia. Furthermore, decreasing cholesterol and triglyc-
`eride levels has been shown to be particularly beneficial in
`patients with diabetes (70, 71). In addition, hypertriglyc-
`eridemia may be an independent risk factor for cardiovas-
`cular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (72). Met-
`formin has major effects on lipid metabolism in patients
`with insulin resistance. It decreases plasma levels of free
`fatty acid (20, 73) and oxidation of these acids by tissue
`(25, 28, 32); it decreases levels of triglycerides (2, 10, 20,
`55, 74) and, therefore, very low-density lipoprotein (20).
`Metformin therapy decreases levels of total cholesterol (2,
`68, 74) and LDL cholesterol (2, 68, 74) while maintaining
`(68, 74) or increasing (2, 20, 55, 57, 67) levels of high-
`density lipoprotein cholesterol. Metformin decreases oxida-
`tive stress and reduces lipid oxidation (75) by lowering
`plasma glucose levels (2). Taken together, these observa-
`tions suggest that the beneficial effects of metformin on
`lipoprotein metabolism may contribute to its protective
`effects against cardiovascular disease.
`Metformin has also been shown to lessen hypercoagula-
`tion and increase fibrinolysis in insulin-resistant states by de-
`creasing levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (76, 77)
`and increasing tissue plasminogen activator activity (74).
`Therapy with metformin also reduces thrombogenic propen-
`sity by decreasing levels of tissue plasminogen activator anti-
`gen (78) and von Willebrand factor (78). In the Biguanides
`and the Prevention of the Risk of Obesity study, 457 nondi-
`abetic patients with visceral obesity (body mass index of 32.5
`kg/m2) were randomly assigned to treatment with diet or met-
`formin (850 mg twice daily) (78). Weight loss was associated
`with a 30% to 40% decrease in plasminogen activator inhib-
`itor-1 activity, regardless of the method used, whereas met-
`formin produced significantly larger decreases in von Wille-
`brand factor levels than did diet therapy (78). Furthermore,
`metformin therapy decreased platelet aggregation in diabetic
`patients treated with 1700 mg/d (79). Thus, metformin ther-
`
`2 July 2002 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 137 • Number 1 E-29
`
`Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Reprints Desk User on 07/06/2015
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1015, Page 5
`
`

`
`Update Metformin: An Update
`
`Table. Direct and Indirect Cardiovascular Protective Effects of
`Metformin Therapy
`
`Decreases hyperglycemia
`Improves diastolic function
`Decreases total cholesterol levels
`Decreases very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels
`Decreases low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels
`Increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels
`Decreases oxidative stress
`Improves vascular relaxation
`Decreases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels
`Increases tissue plasminogen activator activity
`Decreases von Willebrand factor levels
`Decreases platelet aggregation and adhesion
`
`apy appears to lessen the hypercoagulability and exaggerated
`platelet aggregation and adhesion in diabetic patients (Table).
`
`METFORMIN AND DIABETIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
`Persons with diabetes have a high prevalence of con-
`gestive heart failure (80) secondary to diabetic, hyperten-
`sive, and ischemic changes in the myocardium. Diabetic
`cardiomyopathy, a unique clinical entity, is characterized
`by structural changes in the myocardium (fibrosis) and
`functional alterations in diastolic relaxation and ventricular
`compliance (81– 84) (Figure 3). Delayed diastolic relax-
`ation in diabetic cardiomyopathy is related to diminished
`removal of [Ca2⫹]i from cardiomyocytes after systolic con-
`traction (82, 83). Hyperglycemia has been shown to con-
`tribute to these functional changes (82– 84), and insulin
`resistance also directly contributes to these abnormalities
`(85). Metformin treatment of streptozotocin diabetic rats
`corrects these functional cardiac abnormalities (84, 86),
`perhaps through tyrosine kinase– dependent increases in
`intracellular [Ca2⫹]i removal after systole (84). This car-
`dioprotective action of metformin was shown to be insulin
`independent (84). Moreover, treatment of spontaneously
`hypertensive rats with metformin has been reported to de-
`crease heart rate (a sympathoinhibitory effect) more than
`placebo (87, 88). Although these findings are of interest,
`no clinical trials to date have investigated the effect of met-
`formin on the development and course of congestive heart
`failure in diabetic patients.
`
`METFORMIN AND VASCULAR REACTIVITY
`Hypertension is often associated with insulin resis-
`tance (89). Diabetic patients have a higher incidence of
`hypertension compared with the general population, and
`hypertensive persons are more prone to develop diabetes
`(90, 91). Recently, investigators demonstrated that defec-
`tive insulin signaling may contribute to increased vascular
`resistance (92), which is the hallmark of hypertension in
`type 2 diabetes (89). Insulin normally acts through the
`PI3-kinase pathway to activate nitric oxide synthase, en-
`hance sodium pump activity in vascular smooth muscle,
`and increase glucose transmembrane transport (63). More-
`
`E-30 2 July 2002 Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 137 • Number 1
`
`over, insulin is responsible for the normal handling of di-
`valent cations in vascular smooth muscle (92). Those pro-
`cesses are altered in insulin resistance. Impaired vascular
`insulin action may result
`in impaired nitric oxide–
`dependent vascular relaxation, decreased sodium pump ac-
`tivity, and increased levels of [Ca2⫹]i in vascular smooth
`muscle in patients with type 2 diabetes (14, 63, 92). These
`abnormalities in divalent cation and nitric oxide metabo-
`lism appear to play a role in the increased vascular resis-
`tance and impaired vasorelaxation that characterize hyper-
`tension, which frequently occurs in diabetic patients (92).
`Several reports indicate an antihypertensive effect of
`metformin in animals (88, 93–95) and humans (74, 96).
`In contrast, no effect of metformin on blood pressure was
`reported in other human studies (1, 2, 23). Careful 24-
`hour ambulatory studies may better characterize the effects
`of metformin on blood pressure in diabetic patients (89).
`Potential mechanisms of antihypertensive action of met-
`formin are complex and include both insulin-dependent
`and insulin-independent vasodilatory actions (Figure 3).
`Acute administration of metformin to rat tail arteries in-
`creases repolarization and causes subsequent artery relax-
`ation (97) through reduction in agonist-induced increase
`in intracellular levels of [Ca2⫹]i vascular smooth muscle
`(46, 94). This attenuation of [Ca2⫹]i responses may be
`secondary to increased nitric oxide production by vascular
`smooth muscle during exposure to metformin (94). In-
`deed, nitric oxide has been shown to decrease vascular
`smooth muscle [Ca2⫹]i responses to vasoconstrictor ago-
`nists through activation of the cyclic guanosine monophos-
`phate pathway (98). Metformin may also reduce [Ca2⫹]i
`
`Figure 3. Proposed cellular mechanisms of metformin action in
`the vascular smooth-muscle cells and cardiomyocytes.
`
`In vascular smooth-muscle cells, metformin decreases vasoconstriction by
`enhancing sodium pump activity and nitric oxide (NO) production,
`causing a decrease in intracellular calcium levels (Ca⫹⫹). Metformin
`improves diastolic relaxation by enhancing calcium removal from cardio-
`myocytes after systole. ATP ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; CGMP ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇; GTP ⫽
`䢇䢇䢇; K-ATP ⫽ 䢇䢇䢇.
`
`www.annals.org
`
`Downloaded From: http://annals.org/ by a Reprints Desk User on 07/06/2015
`
`MYLAN Ex. 1015, Page 6
`
`

`
`by incre

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket