throbber
Br.J.Pharmac. (1984),83, 773-782
`
`Pharmacokinetics and biliary excretion of
`bromosulphophthalein, PH]-ouabain and PH](cid:173)
`taurocholic acid in rats with glycerol-induced acute
`renal failure
`C.J. Bowmer&M.S. Yates
`
`Department of Pharmacology, Won;ely Medical and Dental Building, The University, Leeds, LS2 9IT
`
`1 The pharmacokinetics and biliary excretion of bromosulphophthalein (BSP), ouabain and
`taurocholic acid (TChA) have been studied in rats with glycerol-induced acute renal failure (ARF).
`2
`In rats with ARF, the hepatic uptake and initial biliary excretion of BSP were decreased. In
`addition, the rate of BSP conjugation with glutathione by rat liver homogenates was also decreased.
`This latter change may contribute to the initial decrease in the biliary excretion of BSP.
`3 No change was found in the hepatic uptake and biliary excretion of ouabain, but the area under
`the concentration-time curve was increased and the plasma clearance (Cip) decreased in rats with
`ARF. This decrease in Clp was not due to reduced renal excretion.
`4 The decreased Clp of ouabain in rats with ARF may come from reduced tissue binding and a
`concomitant decrease in its volume of-distribution (Vd).
`S The hepatic handling of TChA appeared unaltered in ARF, but the rate constant for the terminal
`part of the concentration-time curve (II) was decreased. This change probably resulted from a large
`increase in V din rats with ARF.
`6
`It is concluded that the decreased uptake of BSP was not due to a non-specific disturbance of
`hepatocyte function in ARF because the hepatic handling of ouabain and TChA were unaltered.
`
`Introduction
`
`The hepatic transport of endogenous and exogenous
`substances probably involves a multiplicity of routes
`both at the initial uptake and final biliary excretion
`steps. Evidence for this comes largely from studies of
`competition for transport between pain; of sub(cid:173)
`stances. These studies have revealed a number of
`different routes for organic anions (Alpert et al.,
`1969; Scharschmidt et al., 1975; Schwenk et al.,
`1976), cations (Solomon & Schanker, 1963) and
`uncharged molecules (Kupferberg & Schanker,
`1968; Klassen, 1978).
`Experimental studies have established that the
`hepatic uptake of indocyanine green (ICG), an or(cid:173)
`ganic anion used to study liver function, is decreased
`in rats with acute and chronic renal failure (Bowmer
`et al., 1982a; Yates et al., 1983a,b,c). Moreover, the
`initial biliary excretion of ICG is decreased, resulting
`in a delay in the excretion of ICG into bile (Bowmer
`et al., 1983a). However, little is known about
`
`whether these changes in hepatic function are re(cid:173)
`stricted to ICG, or if uptake and biliary excretion of
`other substances are similarly affected in renal
`failure.
`The purpose of this study was t" investigate the
`effect of glycerol-induced acute renal h•;lure (ARF)
`on the hepatic uptake and biliary exo:retion of
`bromosuphophthalein
`(BSP),
`ouabmn
`and
`taurocholic acid (TChA). BSP and ICG appear to
`have a common transport route (Schan;chmidt et al.,
`1975; Schwenk et al., 1976); but ouabain and TChA
`have transport routes separate from each other (Mei(cid:173)
`jer et al., 1976; Klassen, 1978) and from BSP
`(Schwenk et al., 1976). Ouabain and TChA were also
`chosen because they are not biotransformed in the rat
`(Cox et al., 1959; Hoffman et al., 1975). A prelimi(cid:173)
`nary account of some of this work has been given
`(Bowmer et al., 1982b; 1983b ).
`
`©The Macmillan Press Ltd 1984
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2027
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 1
`
`

`
`774
`
`C.J. BOWMER & M.S. YATES
`
`Methods
`
`Induction of acute renal failure
`
`The method for the production of glycerol-induced
`ARF has been described
`in detail elsewhere
`{Bowmer et a/., 1982a). Male Wistar albino rats
`(250-350 g) were denied access to water for 24 hand
`ARF was produced by intramuscular injection of
`50% v/v glycerol in sterile saline (0.9%w/v NaCI
`solution), 10 ml kg- 1• Control rats were injected with
`saline, lOmlkg- 1• Both groups of rats were studied
`48 h after their respective injections.
`
`Experimental protocol
`
`Rats were anaesthetized with pentobarbitone
`( 60 mg kg- 1 i.p. ): a tracheal cannula was inserted and
`artificial respiration maintained with a Miniature
`Ideal Pump (BioScience) (ventilation rate 80 strokes
`min- 1 ; stroke volume 10mlkg-1). Cannulae were
`also inserted into the left jugular vein, right carotid
`artery and common bile duct. Rectal temperature
`was maintained at 37"C by means of a heating lamp.
`All compounds were dissolved in saline and in(cid:173)
`jected i.v. over 15-20 s. The dose of BSP was
`25 mgkg- 1. Ouabain was mixed with ['H]-ouabain
`and administered at a dose of 0.1 mgkg- 1 ;
`15/lCikg-1. Similarly, TChAwas mixed with ['H](cid:173)
`TChA and given at5 mgkg-1 ; 10J.1Cikg-1• Heparin(cid:173)
`ized blood samples (0.1 ml) were removed at suitable
`times for 70 min with BSP and for 60 min with oua(cid:173)
`bain and TChA. After each sample was collected,
`blood was replaced with an equal volume of saline.
`Bile was collected over 5 or 10 min intervals for 1 h;
`over 20 min intervals for the second hour and over
`30 min intervals for the third hour. Bile volume was
`measured gravimetrically assuming a density of 1.0
`for rat bile.
`The urinary excretion of ['H]-ouabain was esti(cid:173)
`mated by collecting urine directly from the bladder of
`anaesthetized rats as described by Hirom et a/.
`{1976). In a separate series of experiments the kine(cid:173)
`tics of [3H]-ouabain were determined in the absence
`of any urinary excretion. These experiments were
`performed in rats whose renal pedicles (renal artery,
`vein and ureter) were ligated 10 to 15 min before
`administration of [3H]-ouabain.
`
`Hepatic uptake of fH]-ouabain in vivo
`
`Slices of liver (30-65 mg) were removed from the
`left, median and right lobes of anaesthetized rats at
`2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 and 20 min after injection of ['H](cid:173)
`ouabain (Meijer eta/., 1975). Each slice was blotted,
`weighed and solubilized in 0.7ml FisoSolve (Fisons
`Ltd). The cumulative amount of tissue removed as a
`
`percentage of total liver weight was 1.8 ± 0.2%
`(n= 6) for control rats and 1.8±0.4% (n= 6) for rats
`with ARF. Meijer et a/. (1975) found that [3H](cid:173)
`ouabain was taken up uniformly into slices taken at
`random from different liver lobes. Preliminary ex(cid:173)
`periments confirmed this, so it was assumed that
`uptake measured in one slice was representative of
`uptake into the entire liver.
`
`Analysis of bromosu/phophtha/ein in plasma and bile
`
`Samples (50 Ill) of plasma and bile were diluted with
`an appropriate volume of 0.1 M NaOH and the absor(cid:173)
`bance measured at 575 nm. Plasma samples were also
`read at 395 nm to correct for haemoglobin contami(cid:173)
`nation (E395 x 0.093 =haemoglobin contribution to
`extinction at 575 nm). The absorption spectrum of
`the glutathione conjugate of BSP in alkali is almost
`identical to that of BSP between 500 to 620 nm
`(Goldstein & Combes, 1966) so the total amount of
`BSP in bile was measured.
`
`Hepatic glutathione (GSH)
`
`Liver homogenates were prepared by the procedure
`of Akerboom & Sies (1981) and the fluorometric
`method of Cohn & Lyle {1966) was used to deter(cid:173)
`mine the the GSH content of rat liver.
`
`Hepatic glutathione-S-transferase activity
`
`The spectrophotometric assay of Goldstein &
`Combes {1966) was used to measure the rate of BSP
`conjugation with GSH by rat liver homogenates.
`
`Measurement of radioactivity
`
`Radioactivity in aliquots (50 Ill) of plasma and bile
`was measured in a Beckman LS 330 scintillation
`counter. Samples were counted in plastic insert vials
`(Sterilin Ltd) using 5 m1 of FisoFluor I liquid scintil(cid:173)
`lator {Fisons Ltd). Urine samples (20-200/ll) were
`counted in plastic scintillation vials (LlP Ltd) with
`15 ml of scintillator. Radioactivity in digested pieces
`of liver was measured after addition of 15 ml of
`scintillator followed by 0.5 ml5 M acetic acid. Count(cid:173)
`ing efficiency was assessed by automatic external
`standard channels ratio and, where appropriate, with
`internal standards of [3H]-n-hexadecane (Amersham
`International PLC).
`
`Pharmacokinetic calculations
`
`The plasma concentration-time data for BSP were
`fitted to a biexponential equation by non-linear least
`squares regression analysis (Snedecor & Cochran,
`1967). Data were analysed using a two compartment
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2027
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 2
`
`

`
`PHARMACOKINETICS IN ACliTE RENAL FAILURE
`
`775
`
`model with elimination of BSP from the peripheral
`compartment (Richards et al., 1959). In this model
`k12 is the apparent first order rate constant for trans(cid:173)
`fer of dye from plasma to liver; k21 the rate constant
`for return of BSP to plasma and k23 the rate constant
`for excretion into bile. These rate constants together
`with the apparent volume of the central compartment
`(Vc); the area under the plasma concentration-time
`curve (AUCo...~) and plasma clearance (Clp) were
`calculated using the equations given by Gibaldi &
`Perrier (1975). The apparent volume of distribution
`at steady-state (Vdss) was calculated as:-
`
`Vdss=Vc
`
`( k12 + k21 + k23)
`k21 +k23
`
`(Bowmeretal.,1982a)
`
`The disappearance of ['H)-ouabain and ['H]-TChA
`from plasma was analysed using the 'CSTRIP' prog(cid:173)
`ramme (Sedman & Wagner, 1976). This indicated
`that their decay was at least triexponential and so
`these data were not subjected to compartmental
`analysis. Instead the kinetics of ['H)-ouabain and
`(3H]-TChA were described in terms of (1) the rate
`constant for the terminal part of the concentration(cid:173)
`time curve (jl); (2) the apparent volume of distribu(cid:173)
`tion (Vd) which was calculated from:-
`
`Dose
`
`Vd
`
`(Gibaldi & Perrier, 1975)
`
`and (3) the plasma clearance (Clp). The area under
`the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to
`60 min was calculated using the trapezoidal rule and
`the area under the plasma concentration-time profile
`from the last observation (Cp60) to infinity was esti(cid:173)
`mated by:-
`
`Cp60
`AUCoo+~ = -ll-: (Benet & Galeazzi, 1979)
`
`The AU Co+~ was the sum of the two areas.
`Results are expressed as mean± s.d. and statistical
`comparison was made by the non-paired Student's t
`test.
`
`Materials
`
`Results
`
`Intramuscular injection of glycerol resulted in a
`uraemic state characterized by at least a four fold
`increase in plasma urea concentration. Mean body
`weight, wet liver weight and liver weight to body
`weight ratio were not significantly different between
`any group of control or uraemic rats used. These
`results are similar to those previously obtained in our
`laboratory (Bowmer et al., 1982a; Yates et al.,
`1983a,b).
`
`Bromosulphophthalein kinetics
`
`Figure 1 shows the mean plasma concentration-time
`data obtained after i.v. administration of BSP
`(25 mgkg-1) to control and uraemic rats. Plasma
`concentrations between 5 to 15 min were significant(cid:173)
`ly elevated (P< 0.05) in the rats with ARF which
`suggests that the initial disappearance of BSP was
`delayed in the uraemic rats. The half -life of this initial
`disappearance phase, T 0.5cx, was significantly pro(cid:173)
`longed (P<0.01) and the rate constants k 12 and k21
`were decreased (P< 0.05) in uraemic rats (Table 1).
`There was no significant change in the half-life of the
`terminal elimination phase, T 0.5jl, k23; Vdss or Clp,
`but Vc was significantly larger (P< 0.05) in the
`uraemic rats.
`
`500
`
`10
`
`Q
`
`E
`"' 2-
`" 0 " a. en
`"' "'
`"' "' a:
`
`E
`
`BSP and ouabain were obtained from Sigma Chemi(cid:173)
`cal Co. and TChA was bought from CP Laboratories
`Ltd
`(Bishop Stortford, U.K.). GSH and o(cid:173)
`phthalaldehyde were obtained from BDH Ltd. (G-
`(G-3H]-TChA
`3H]-ouabain
`(37 Ci/mmol) and
`( 6.6 Ci/mmol), all of stated radioactive purity
`>97%, were purchased from Amersham Interna(cid:173)
`tional PLC and New England Nuclear Ltd respec(cid:173)
`tively, and were used without further purification.
`
`1 o~----1~0~--2~0~--~30~--~4~0--~5~0--~6~0~~70
`
`Time (min)
`Figure 1 Plasma concentrations of bromosul(cid:173)
`phophtbalein (BSP, 25 mgkg- 1 i.v.) in control rats (0)
`and rats witb acute renal failure (e). Values are mean
`( n = 7); s.d. shown by vertical lines. Significantly differ(cid:173)
`ent
`from control vaues: *P<0.05; **P<O.Ol;
`•••P<O.OOl.
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2027
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 3
`
`

`
`776
`
`C.J. BOWMER & M.S. YATES
`
`Table 1 Effect of glycerol-induced acute renal
`failure on the pharmacokinetics of bromosul(cid:173)
`phophthalein (BSP, 25 mg kg -I i. v.)
`
`1200
`
`T
`
`Pharmacokinetic
`parameters
`
`Control rats
`(n=7)
`
`Uraemic rats
`(n=7)
`
`To.s<l(min)
`To.s ~(min)
`k12 (min- 1)
`k21 (min- 1)
`k23 (min- 1)
`Vc(1 kg- 1)
`Vp(1 kg- 1)
`Vd,. (1 kg- 1)
`Clp(mlmin- 1 kg- 1
`bodywt)
`
`1.4±0.2
`27±10
`0.49±0.08
`0.0073 ± 0.0033
`0'.029 ± 0.009
`0.039 ± 0.003
`0.58±0.18
`0.61 ±0.18
`15±2
`
`2.4±0.7**
`53±34
`0.30±0.07***
`0.0043±0.0013*
`0.020±0.014
`0.066 ± 0.031*
`1.0±0.6
`1.1 ±0.6
`14±3
`
`Results are given as mean± s.d.
`*P<0.05; **P<O.Ol; ***P<0.001 relative to
`respective control group.
`k12 = rate constant for transfer from plasma to
`liver; k21 =rate constant for return of BSP to plas(cid:173)
`ma; k23 =rate constant for excretion into bile;
`Vc = apparent volume of the central compartment;
`Vp =apparent volume of the peripheral compar(cid:173)
`ment and V dss = apparent volume of distribution at
`steady-state; Clp =plasma clearance.
`
`In uraemic rats the percentage recovery of BSP
`from bile over 3 h (80 ± 9%; n = 6) and overall bile
`flow rate (3.9 ± 0.9mlh- 1 kg- 1 ; n = 6) were not sig(cid:173)
`nificantly different from control values (87 ± 6% and
`4.5±0.9mlh- 1 kg- 1; n=6 respectively). However,
`the biliary excretion rate during the first 10 min after
`injection
`of
`BSP
`in
`uraemic
`rats
`(175±115flgmin- 1 kg- 1 ; n=6) was significantly
`slower
`(P<0.001)
`than
`in
`controls
`(493±75flgmin- 1 kg- 1 ; n=6) (Figure 2). This ini(cid:173)
`tial delay in the biliary excretion of BSP was not
`caused by decreased bile flow rate at this particular
`rats with ARF
`time, because
`flow
`rate
`in
`(3.3 ± 1.8 ml h- 1 kg- 1; n = 6) was not significantly
`different from that in controls (4.2 ±0.5 mlh- 1 kg- 1;
`n = 6). At all other intervals there was no difference
`in biliary excretion rates between the two groups of
`rats (Figure 2).
`
`Bromosu/phophthalein conjugation
`
`The ability of livers from uraemic rats to conjugate
`BSP with exogenous GSH was significantly de(cid:173)
`creased (P< 0.01 ). In uraemic rats the in vitro
`glutathione-S-transferase
`activity
`was
`3.3±0.5 l'molg- 1 min- 1 (n= 7) whereas enzyme ac(cid:173)
`in controls was 3.9 ± 0.3 l'molg-1 min- 1
`tivity
`(n = 7). In a separate series of experiments the en(cid:173)
`dogenous GSH content of livers from the uraemic
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`;-
`~
`c
`.E
`en
`2-
`~
`~
`c:
`0
`-~
`<..>
`
`X " ~
`
`.!!!
`iii
`
`1.0
`
`1.5
`
`2.0
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Time (hi
`Fipre 2 Biliary excretion profile of bromosul(cid:173)
`phophthalein (BSP, 25 mgkg- 1 i.v.) in control rats (un(cid:173)
`broken line - - ) and rats with acute renal failure
`(broken line----). Values are mean (n = 6); s.d. shown
`by vertical lines. Significantly different from control
`values: ••• P< 0.001.
`
`gtoup (3.2 ± 0.5 flmol g- 1 ; n = 8) tended to be smal(cid:173)
`ler than that in controls (3.7 ± 0.5 flmolg- 1 ; n = 8).
`However, this difference was not statistically sig(cid:173)
`nificant.
`
`Ouabain kinetics
`
`In rats with intact renal pedicles. The disappearance
`of [3H]-ouabain (0.1 mgkg- 1 i.v.) from plasma in
`both control and uraemic rats is shown in Figure 3. At
`all sample times, mean radioactivity was greater
`(P<0.05) in uraemic than in control plasma. As a
`result, the AU~® was larger (P<0.02) in the
`uraemic group and there was a concomitant decrease
`(P< 0.02) in Clp (Table 2). By contrast, no signific(cid:173)
`ant change in either fl or Vd was observed (Table 2).
`Figure 4 shows that between 5 and 20 min follow(cid:173)
`ing injection of [3H]-ouabain, a significantly gteater
`(P< 0.01) percentage of the injected dose was found
`in livers of uraemic rats. However, the percentage of
`[lH]-ouabain excreted into bile after 1 h was not
`significantly different between control (43±7%;
`n = 6) and uraemic ( 49 ± 7%; n = 6) rats. In addition,
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2027
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 4
`
`

`
`200
`
`100
`
`X
`
`10
`
`E
`E
`"-
`~ u
`
`c
`0
`<.J
`c
`"iii
`.0
`"' :>
`"' ~
`"' 1i:
`
`0
`<.J
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS IN ACUTE RENAL FAILURE
`
`777
`
`l i I I
`?f. I
`I
`
`iii
`~
`
`,0>
`
`" " 0
`
`"C
`
`I
`
`r
`I
`
`1 o~----~10~--~20~---3~0~---4~0~---5~0~--~60
`
`Time (min)
`ouabain
`of
`concentrations
`3 Plasma
`Figure
`(0.1 mgkg- 1; 15,.Cikg-1) in control rats (0) and rats
`with acute renal failure (e). Values are mean (n= 6);
`s.d. shown by vertical lines. All concentrations in plasma
`from uraemic rats were significantly different from con(cid:173)
`trol values: P< 0.05.
`
`there was no difference in either biliary excretion
`rate, over any collection interval, or overall bile flow
`rate between the two groups of animals, so decreased
`or delayed biliary excretion cannot account for the
`greater portion of [3H]-ouabain in uraemic livers. In
`control rats
`the mean
`liver
`to plasma ratio
`(dpmg- 1/dpmml- 1) of ['H)-ouabain between 5 to
`20 min was 12 ± 2 ( n = 4) whilst in uraemic rats its
`value was 11 ± 2 (n = 4). It seems likely, therefore,
`that the increased levels of ouabain in uraemic livers
`were a result of correspondingly higher plasma levels.
`The percentage of the dose excreted into urine
`
`~~------~------~1L0------~1~5------~20"
`
`Time (min)
`
`Figure 4 Comparison of the hepatic content of ouabain
`(0.1mgkg-1; 15,.Cikg-1; i.v.) in control rats (0) and
`rats with acute renal failure (e). Values are mean
`(n = 6); s.d. shown by vertical lines. Significantly differ(cid:173)
`ent from control values: • P< 0.05; •• P< 0.01.
`
`over 1 h was very variable in both groups. In controls
`the median was 8.0% with a range from 2.4 to 13%
`and in the uraemic group the median was 1.6% and
`range from 0.01 to 5.2%. Using the Wilcoxon rank
`test, the renal excretion of [3H]-ouabain was found to
`be significantly less (P< 0.01) in uraemic rats.
`
`In rats with ligated renal pedicles. These experiments
`were done to investigate the possibility that de(cid:173)
`creased renal excretion of ouabain was the cause of
`
`Table 1 Effect of glycerol-induced acute renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of ['H)-ouabain (0.1 mgkg- 1;
`15 ,.a kg- 1) in non-ligated and renal pedicle-ligated rats
`
`Non-ligated
`Control (n = 6)
`Uraemic (n = 6)
`Ligated
`Control (n=4)
`Uraemic (n = 4)
`
`AU Co-.~
`(dpmminml- 1)
`X 10-6
`
`0'.89±0.23
`1.6±0.5""
`
`~
`(min- 1)
`
`0.020±0.007
`0.017 ± 0.006
`
`Clp
`(ml min- 1 kg-1)
`
`35±10
`21±6° 0
`
`Vd
`(1 kg- 1)
`
`1.8±0.6
`1.4±0.4
`
`1.5±0.2*
`5.2±2.1""*
`
`0.0071±0.0017*
`0.0035 ± 0.0023"*
`
`21 ±3t
`7.6±4.o•••*
`
`3.0±0.3*
`2.4±0.3"*
`
`Results are given as mean± s.d.
`• P< 0.05; •• P< 0.02; ••• P< 0.01 relative to respective control group.
`• P< 0.05; 'P< 0.01 relative to control and uraemic non-ligated rats.
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2027
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 5
`
`

`
`778
`
`C.J. BOWMER & M.S. YATES
`
`200.
`
`100
`
`M
`
`' 0
`
`X
`:=-
`E
`E
`c.
`:!0'.
`u c
`0
`u
`c
`"iii
`.a
`"' ::l
`"' ~
`"' 0:
`
`0
`
`1
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`Time (min)
`
`ouabain
`of
`concentrations
`5 Plasma
`Figure
`(0.1 mgkg-1; 151'Cikg-1) in renal pedicle-ligated con(cid:173)
`trol rats (0) and renal pedicle-ligated rats with acute
`renal failure (e). Valuesaremean(n= 4);s.d.shownby
`vertical lines. With the exception of the 1 and 3 min
`samples, all concentrations in plasma from rats with
`acute renal failure were significantly different from con(cid:173)
`trol values: 0 P<0.05; ••P<0.01; •••P<O.OOl.
`
`increased plasma levels and decreased Clp in uraemic
`rats. Figure 5 shows the mean radioactivity in plasma
`from both ligated control and ligated uraemic rats.
`Except for the 1 and 3 min samples, plasma radioac(cid:173)
`tivity was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in the li(cid:173)
`gated uraemic group. The AU4+~ was greater
`(P<0.02) in ligated uraemics; while /l, Clp and Vd
`were all significantly less (P< 0.05; Table 2). The
`percentage dose of [lH]-ouabain excreted into bile
`after 1 h was 52± 7 (n= 4) in ligated controls and
`54±5 (n=4) in ligated uraemic rats. These re-
`
`Table 3 Effect of glycerol-induced acute renal
`failure on
`the pharmacokinetics of
`['H)(cid:173)
`taurocholicacid (5 mgkg-1; lO~tCikg- 1)
`
`Pharmacokinetic
`parameters
`
`Control rats
`(n=7)
`
`Uraemic rats
`(n=8)
`
`AUCo..~
`(dpmminmJ-1) x 10-s
`p (min-1)
`Vd(1 kg-1)
`Clp (mlmin-1 kg- 1)
`
`4.1 ±0.5
`
`3.2±0.8
`
`O.D18 ± 0.004
`2.8±0.8
`48±6
`
`0.012±0.002°
`4.4±1.1"
`55±18
`
`100
`
`10
`
`;:
`
`X
`
`I
`
`E
`E
`c.
`:!0'.
`u
`c
`0
`u
`<(
`.r::
`u
`I-
`
`"' ~
`"' 0:
`
`0·1 o~--7., o,.----,2:!:o:---::3!::0-----,-4b---=5.Lo--,Jso
`
`Time (min)
`
`Figure 6 Plasma concentrations of taurocholic acid
`(TChA, 5 mgkg-1 ; l0j4Cikg- 1) in seven control rats
`(0) and eight rats with acute renal failure (e). Values
`are mean; s.d. shown by vertical lines. Significantly
`different from control values; • P< 0.05.
`
`coveries were not significantly different and there
`was no difference in biliary excretion rates at any
`time period between ligated control and ligated
`uraemic rats.
`Pedicle ligation itself had a marked effect upon the
`kinetics of [3H]-ouabain in both control and uraemic
`rats. In both ligated control and ligated uraemic rats
`there were significant
`increases (P<O.Ol)
`in
`AU4+~ and Vd and decreases (P<0.05) in/land
`Clp when compared to their respective non-ligated
`counterparts. It might be anticipated that with neglig(cid:173)
`ible renal excretion more [lH]-ouabain would be
`excreted into bile in both ligated control and ligated
`uraemic rats. Although the percentages were higher
`(52 and 54%, respectively) than the corresponding
`values for non-ligated rats (43 and 49%, respective(cid:173)
`ly), they were not statistically different. Moreover, no
`differences were found in biliary excretion rates be(cid:173)
`tween the respective groups of ligated and non(cid:173)
`ligated rats.
`
`Taurocholic acid kinetics
`
`Results are given as mean± s.d.
`• P<O.Ol relative to respective control group.
`
`The decline of radioactivity following injection of
`[3H]-TChA (5 mg kg- 1) to control and uraemic rats is
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2027
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 6
`
`

`
`PHARMACOKINETICS IN ACUTE RENAL FAILURE
`
`779
`
`shown in Figure 6. Mean plasma levels of radioactivi(cid:173)
`ty were significantly lower (P< 0.05) between 3 to
`5 min in the uraemic group and higher (P< 0.05) at
`45 min than in controls. In the uraemic rats, jl was
`lower (P< 0.01) and Vd greater
`significantly
`(P<0.01); but there was no changeinClp (Table 3).
`There was no difference in biliary excretion rates
`between control and uraemic rats and no difference
`after 1 h, in the percentage recovery of ['H]-TChA
`from bile of control rats (91 ± 5%; n = 6) and
`uraemic rats (84±6%; n = 7).
`
`Discussion
`
`Compartmental analysis of the disappearance of BSP
`from plasma demonstrated that in uraemic rats the
`initial removal of the dye was slowed. As BSP is
`largely removed from plasma by the liver, slowed
`removal suggests decreased hepatic uptake in the
`uraemic group. Furthermore, decreased uptake ap(cid:173)
`pears to be associated with an initial delay in the
`biliary excretion of BSP. These changes in the way in
`which the liver handles BSP are qualitatively similar
`to those found previously with ICG (Bowmer et a/.,
`1982a; Yates eta/., 1983a,b,c). This is not surprising
`because there is evidence to suggest that both dyes
`share
`the same pathway for hepatic uptake
`(Scharschmidt et a/., 1975; Schwenk et a/., 1976).
`Although uptake was decreased, no change was
`found in the Clp of BSP in rats with ARF. This may
`be due to the increase in Vc which would tend to
`attenuate the effect of the decrease in k12 so that no
`change of Clp occurred in uraemic rats.
`By contrast to ICG, BSP is partially conjugated
`with GSH prior to excretion into bile. Whelan eta/.,
`(1970) have shown that the major metabolite, BSP(cid:173)
`glutathione, is more efficiently excreted than the
`parent dye. In addition, conjugation may be a rate
`limiting step in the overall transfer of BSP from
`plasma to bile (Whelan et a/., 1970). Interference
`with conjugation either by feeding rats on protein(cid:173)
`free diets (Combes, 1965) or by pretreatment with
`the
`glutathione-S-transferase
`inhibitor,
`ben(cid:173)
`ziodarone (Priestley & Plaa, 1969) results in a
`marked impairment of biliary excretion. In homage(cid:173)
`nates of livers from uraemic rats, the rate of BSP
`conjugation with GSH was decreased by about 15%.
`It is possible, therefore, that part of the initial delay in
`the biliary excretion of BSP was due to decreased rate
`of conjugate formation.
`Factors other than altered hepatic function are
`unlikely to have contributed to the decreased uptake
`of BSP. For example, Vc was increased by about 69%
`in the uraemic rats, but this change may not have
`reduced the quantity of dye reaching the liver per unit
`time because plasma levels of BSP were higher in the
`uraemic group for a substantial proportion of the
`
`initial disappearance phase and total liver blood flow
`is increased by about 38% in rats 48 h after induction
`of ARF (Hiley eta/., 1980). In common with other
`highly bound anions (Bowmer & Lindup, 1979) the
`plasma-protein binding of BSP is decreased in
`uraemic rats. At an initial concentration of 750 !lM,
`the fraction of BSP bound in diluted uraemic plasma
`(1:3) is increased almost three fold when compared
`to diluted plasma from control rats (Bowmer &
`Yates, unpublished results). Grausz & Schmid
`( 1971) have provided evidence that for BSP, the rate
`of hepatic uptake is inversely related to the extent of
`albumin binding, so decreased binding may not con(cid:173)
`tribute to reduced hepatic uptake. However, de(cid:173)
`creased binding may have contributed to the increase
`in Vc seen in the uraemic rats. Recent work by Inoue
`eta/. (1983) showed that the hepatic uptake of BSP
`was not impaired in analbuminaemic rats. In these
`rats, the Qp of BSP was increased which, the authors
`concluded, was due to a large increase in the V d of
`BSP resulting from an absence of albumin binding
`capacity.
`The present study shows that the hepatic uptake
`and biliary excretion of ouabain are unaltered in
`uraemic rats. A greater proportion of the dose was
`present in uraemic livers but this was probably due to
`increased plasma concentrations of ouabain in the
`uraemic group. The Clp of ouabain was decreased by
`about 40% in uraemic rats. Clearly this change was
`not brought about by altered hepatic elimination and
`although renal excretion was reduced, this too cannot
`fully explain the decrease in Clp because Clp was still
`altered when uraemic rats with ligated pedicles were
`compared to their respective controls. The most like(cid:173)
`ly explanation is that the apparent V d of ouabain was
`smaller in the uraemic rats. Although Vd was some
`22% lower in uraemics it was not statistically differ(cid:173)
`ent from that determined in the control group. How(cid:173)
`ever, V d was significantly lower in the ligated
`uraemic rats compared to ligated controls.
`In patients with renal failure the V d of digoxin is
`decreased and is associated with relatively higher
`plasma concentrations of this drug (Reuning et a/.,
`1973). This change in Vd seems to be related to
`decreased tissue binding as Jusko & Weintraub
`(1974) showed that less digoxin accumulated in the
`myocardium of uraemic patients. It is possible, there(cid:173)
`fore, that decreased tissue binding was responsible
`for the higher plasma levels of ouabain in uraemic
`rats.
`There was no change in the Clp of TChA in
`uraemic rats and this together with the lack of any
`change in biliary excretion suggests that the hepatic
`handling of the bile acid is unchanged in ARF. Al(cid:173)
`though fl was decreased by about 33% there was a
`concomitant increase (57%) in Vd which probably
`accounts for the decrease in jl in rats with ARF.
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2027
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 7
`
`

`
`780
`
`C.J. BOWMER & M.S. YATES
`
`Overall the results suggest that the hepatic uptake
`and biliary excretion of ouabain and TChA are unal(cid:173)
`tered in uraemic rats. By contrast, the uptake of BSP
`was impaired and previous work (Bowmer et al.,
`1982a;Yates et al., 1983a,b,c) has shown that uptake
`of ICG is also decreased. TChA and ouabain may be
`handled differently by the liver from BSP or ICG
`because there is evidence to suggest that the former
`have different uptake pathways from the latter
`(Schwenk et al., 1976). Furthermore, TChA and
`ouabain may themselves have separate uptake path(cid:173)
`ways (Meijer et al., 1976; Klassen, 1978). Because
`there is no general impairment in the hepatic uptake
`of these compounds it would seem that decreased
`uptake of BSP and ICG cannot be explained by a
`non-specific alteration of hepatocyte function in
`renal failure. Isolated perfused livers from uraemic
`rats have a decreased ability to remove ICG from the
`perfusion medium (Yates et al., 1984) which suggests
`that the metabolites which accumulate in uraemic
`plasma do not inhibit uptake of ICG. As BSP shares a
`common uptake pathway (Scharschmidt et al., 1975;
`Schwenk et al., 1976), this would suggest that the
`impaired removal of BSP was also not due to inhibi(cid:173)
`tion by retained metabolites.
`BSP and ICG are known to bind avidly to hepatic
`cytosol proteins and in particular to ligandin (Levi el
`al., 1969; Kamisaka el al., 1975; Ketley et al., 1975;
`Ketterer et al., 1976). A decrease in the binding
`capacity of these proteins, brought about by either a
`change in affinity and/or quantity of protein present,
`might possibly explain the decreased uptake of these
`dyes. In addition, changes in regard to ligandin may
`also explain the decreased biotransformation of BSP
`by homogenates of uraemic livers because ligandin
`behaves as a glutathione-S-transferase (Habig el al.,
`1974). If decreased binding capacity of liver cytosol
`proteins were responsible for impaired uptake of
`BSP and ICG then it could be predicted that hepatic
`uptake will be similarly impaired for other substances
`
`References
`
`that bind to these proteins whereas no change in
`uptake should occur when they do not interact. Oua(cid:173)
`bain appears to have little affinity for these proteins
`(Kupferberg & Schanker, 1968; Klassen, 1975)
`which would be consistent with the lack of any change
`in the uptake of this drug; but TChA interacts with
`ligandin (Kamisaka et aL, 1975) yet there was no
`change in the uptake of this bile acid. Furthermore, a
`number of studies have shown that there is no corre(cid:173)
`lation between the amount of binding proteins in
`liver cytosol and the rate of hepatic uptake of BSP
`(Gregus & Klassen, 1982), its non-metabolized
`analogue dibromosulphophthalein (Meijer et al.,
`1977) and ICG (Fischer et al., 1978) in the rat.
`Clearly this evidence, albeit indirect, does not sup(cid:173)
`port the idea that impaired uptake results from a
`decreased binding capacity of liver cytosol proteins in
`uraemic rats. In order to elucidate the role of cytosol
`binding proteins in the impaired hepatic uptake of
`BSP and ICG in uraemic rats, it will be necessary to
`determine the quantity of these proteins in uraemic
`livers and to study their binding properties.
`The present study adds to our knowledge of liver
`function in renal failure by demonstrating that the
`hepatic uptake and initial biliary excretion of BSP are
`decreased in ARF. The cause of decreased uptake is
`unclear but it would seem that this change is not due
`to a gross disturbance of hepatocyte function because
`the uptake and biliary excretion of ouabain and
`TChA were unaffected. In addition, these alterations
`of liver function are not confined to rats with ARF as
`impaired uptake of BSP has been observed in pa(cid:173)
`tients with chronic renal failure (Wernze & Spech,
`1971).
`
`This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. We wish
`to thank Dr D. Mackay for helpful discussions during the
`preparation of this manuscript. Correspondence and reprint
`requests to M.S.Y. please.
`
`(1981). Assay of
`AKERBOOM, T.P.M. & SIES, H.
`glutathione, glutathione disulfide and glutathione mixed
`disulfides in biologi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket