throbber
Journal of Dialysis
`
`ISSN: 0362-8558 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/irnf17
`
`Drug Metabolism and Active Drug Metabolites in
`Renal Failure
`
`Marcus M. Reidenberg & Dennis E. Drayer
`
`To cite this article: Marcus M. Reidenberg & Dennis E. Drayer (1977) Drug Metabolism
`and Active Drug Metabolites in Renal Failure, Journal of Dialysis, 1:4, 313-318, DOI:
`10.3109/08860227709038422
`
`To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08860227709038422
`
`Published online: 07 Jul 2009.
`
`Submit your article to this journal
`
`Article views: 11
`
`View related articles
`
`Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
`http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=irnf17
`
`Download by: [Margaret Smith]
`
`Date: 07 March 2016, At: 08:27
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2023
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 1
`
`

`
`JOURNAL OF DIALYSIS, 1(4), 313-318 (1977)
`
`EDITORIAL
`
`DRUG METABOLISM AND ACTIVE DRUG METABOLITES
`IN RENAL FAILURE
`
`A r e l a t i v e l y small number of drugs are e l i m i n a t e d
`from t h e body by r e n a l e x c r e t i o n of t h e drug i t s e l f .
`Some of these drugs are:
`c o l i s t i n
`
`p e n i c i l l i n
`
`procainamide
`d i goxin
`aminoglucoside a n t i b i o t i c s
`
`c y c l o s e r i n e
`
`ethambutol
`
`methotrexate
`t e t r a c y c l i n e
`Methods f o r reducing t h e u s u a l doses of these drugs for
`p a t i e n t s r e q u i r i n g c h r o n i c d i a l y s i s have been p u b l i s h e d
`i n v a r i o u s p l a c e s and are now s t a n d a r d p r a c t i c e (1-4).
`
`313
`Copyright 0 1977 hy Marcel Dekker. Inc. All Rights Reserved. Neither this work nor any part
`may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical. including
`photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system.
`without permission in writing from the publisher.
`
`Downloaded by [Margaret Smith] at 08:27 07 March 2016
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2023
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 2
`
`

`
`314
`
`REIDENBERG AND DRAYER
`
`Most d r u g s , however, are n o t excreted unchanged.
`
`They a r e b i o t r a n s f o r m e d i n t h e body t o v a r i o u s metabo-
`l i t e s which are e v e n t u a l l y excreted. The major p a t h -
`ways of drug b i o t r a n s f o r m a t i o n , o x i d a t i o n and glucu-
`
`r o n i d e c o n j u g a t i o n , a p p e a r t o be normal i n r e n a l
`
`f a i l u r e . S e v e r a l minor pathways, i n c l u d i n g ester
`h y d r o l y s i s a n d r e d u c t i o n , seem slow (5). However,
`i r r e s p e c t i v e of whether t h e b i o t r a n s f o r m a t i o n pathway
`is normal o r slow, t h e end metabolic p r o d u c t s of t h e
`drug w i l l accumulate i n t h e p a t i e n t w i t h r e n a l f a i l u r e .
`
`T r a d i t i o n a l l y , t h e s e b i o t r a n s f o r m a t i o n pathways
`
`have been c o n s i d e r e d d e t o x i c a t i o n pathways. The f i n a l
`metabolites of drugs have been c o n s i d e r e d pharmaco-
`
`l o g i c a l l y i n e r t , a n d t h e i r build-up
`
`i n p a t i e n t s w i t h
`
`end stage r e n a l disease h a s been i g n o r e d . Y e t , r e c e n t
`
`s t u d i e s have d e m o n s t r a t e d pharmacologic a c t i v i t y of
`
`many drug m e t a b o l i t e s , and t h e i r a c c u m u l a t i o n i n r e n a l
`
`f a i l u r e can lead t o u n a n t i c i p a t e d e f f e c t s .
`
`Muscle weakness and t e n d e r n e s s t o g e t h e r w i t h a
`
`rise i n serum c r e a t i n e k i n a s e were n o t e d i n 5 uremic
`
`p a t i e n t s b e i n g treated w i t h 1-2g of c l o f i b r a t e d a i l y .
`
`Marked a c c u m u l a t i o n of b o t h f r e e and t o t a l c h l o r o -
`
`p h e n o x y i s o b u t y r i c a c i d , t h e a c t i v e metabolite of clo-
`f i b r a t e , was found i n t h e serum of 3 p a t i e n t s i n whom
`it was s o u g h t . When c l o f i b r a t e was s t o p p e d , t h e muscle
`
`symptoms and c r e a t i n e k i n a s e e l e v a t i o n s u b s i d e d (6).
`
`Downloaded by [Margaret Smith] at 08:27 07 March 2016
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2023
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 3
`
`

`
`EDITORIAL
`
`315
`
`Oxypurinol is a n a c t i v e metabolite of a l l o p u r i n o l
`
`t h a t is normally excreted i n t h e u r i n e . Plasma l e v e l s
`of o x y p u r i n o l i n p a t i e n t s w i t h poor r e n a l f u n c t i o n
`
`t a k i n g a l l o p u r i n o l a r e several f o l d h i g h e r t h a n t h e
`o x y p u r i n o l l e v e l s i n s u b j e c t s w i t h normal k i d n e y s .
`T h i s h a s been correlated w i t h a h i g h e r i n c i d e n c e of
`
`s i d e effects i n r e n a l f a i l u r e p a t i e n t s g i v e n a l l o p u r i -
`
`no1 t h a n i n p a t i e n t s w i t h h e a l t h y k i d n e y s ( 7 ) .
`
`Sulfonamides are b o t h e x c r e t e d unchanged and
`b i o t r a n s f o r m e d by a c e t y l a t i o n w i t h subsequent u r i n a r y
`
`e x c r e t i o n of t h e a c e t y l a t e d m e t a b o l i t e . While reduc-
`
`t i o n of u s u a l sulfonamide dosage c a n keep t h e plasma
`
`sulfonamide l e v e l i n t h e u s u a l r a n g e i n p a t i e n t s w i t h
`
`poor r e n a l f u n c t i o n , it cannot p r e v e n t t h e plasma
`
`l e v e l s of a c e t y l s u l f o n a m i d e from r i s i n g t o h i g h e r t h a n
`
`u s u a l l e v e l s . Adam and Dawborn observed h i g h a c e t y l -
`
`sulfonamide l e v e l s i n a l l 4 p a t i e n t s w i t h very poor
`
`r e n a l f u n c t i o n i n t h e i r s t u d y and c o r r e l a t e d t h i s w i t h
`
`d r u g - r e l a t e d nausea a n d vomiting i n three of t h e
`
`p a t i e n t s (8).
`
`Meperidine is normally metabolized t o normeperi-
`d i n e which may t h e n be e i t h e r e x c r e t e d i n t h e u r i n e or
`
`f u r t h e r metabolized. Normeperidine h a s been shown i n
`a n i m a l s t o have less a n a l g e s i c potency b u t more con-
`
`v u l s a n t potency t h a n meperidine. P a t i e n t s w i t h r e n a l
`
`Downloaded by [Margaret Smith] at 08:27 07 March 2016
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2023
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 4
`
`

`
`316
`
`REIDENBF3G AND DRAYER
`
`f a i l u r e g i v e n meperidine f o r p o s t - t r a n s p l a n t a t i o n
`
`a n a l g e s i a have marked accumulation of normeperidine
`a f t e r a f e w d o s e s of t h e p a r e n t drug. Two p a t i e n t s
`
`w i t h poor r e n a l f u n c t i o n r e c e i v i n g meperidine and
`
`having s i g n s and symptoms of c e n t r a l nervous s y s t e m
`
`i r r i t a b i l i t y had h i g h normeperidine l e v e l s . The meper-
`i d i n e was s t o p p e d , and t h e c e n t r a l nervous s y s t e m
`i r r i t a b i l i t y s u b s i d e d . T h i s d e c l i n e i n CNS i r r i t a b i l i t y
`
`seemed t o p a r a l l e l t h e f a l l of normeperidine l e v e l s in
`t h e one p a t i e n t i n whom i t was measured (9).
`Procainamide is e x c r e t e d unchanged or a c e t y a t e d
`to N-acetylprocainamide which is t h e n e l i m i n a t e d from
`
`t h e body by u r i n a r y e x c r e t i o n . N-Acetylprocainamide
`has a n a c t i o n on t h e h e a r t t h a t is similar t o procain-
`amide (10-12).
`P a t i e n t s w i t h r e n a l f a i l u r e r e c e i v i n g
`
`procainamide a t dosages a p p r o p r i a t e l y reduced t o c o r r e c t
`for t h e slower t h a n normal e l i m i n a t i o n of procainamide
`s t i l l had marked accumulation of N-acetylprocainamide.
`The i n t e n s i t y of e f f e c t observed, both t h e r a p e u t i c and
`t o x i c , w a s c l e a r l y r e l a t e d t o t h i s m e t a b o l i t e accumu-
`
`l a t i o n a s w e l l as t h e procainamide i t s e l f ( 1 3 ) .
`
`These examples demonstrate t h a t c l o f i b r a t e , a l l o -
`
`p u r i n o l , sulfonamides, meperidine, and procainamide
`
`are biotransformed t o a c t i v e m e t a b o l i t e s t h a t accumu-
`
`l a t e and produce e f f e c t s i n p a t i e n t s w i t h poor r e n a l
`
`f u n c t i o n . A g r e a t many o t h e r drugs are known t o have
`
`Downloaded by [Margaret Smith] at 08:27 07 March 2016
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2023
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 5
`
`

`
`EDITORIAL
`
`317
`
`a c t i v e metabolites (14). For many of t h e s e a c t i v e
`
`m e t a b o l i t e s , u r i n a r y e x c r e t i o n is a major pathway of
`
`normal e l i m i n a t i o n . The accumulation of t h e s e metabo-
`
`l i t e s can be p r e d i c t e d i n r e n a l f a i l u r e p a t i e n t s and
`
`t h e i r e f f e c t s a n t i c i p a t e d . More i n f o r m a t i o n about
`a c t i v e drug metabolites and t h e i r accumulation i n renal
`
`f a i l u r e c a n lead t o more p r e d i c t a b l e dose-response
`
`r e l a t i o n s h i p s and t h e r e b y better drug t h e r a p y f o r t h i s
`
`group of p a t i e n t s .
`
`Marcus M. Reidenberg, M.D.
`
`Dennis E. Drayer, Ph.D.
`
`Departments of Pharmacology and
`Medicine and t h e Rogosin Kidney
`C e n t e r , The New York H o s p i t a l -
`C o r n e l l Medical C e n t e r , New York,
`N.Y. 10021
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. M. Reidenberg, Renal F u n c t i o n and Drgg Action,
`Saunders, P h i l a d e l p h i a , 197'1.
`
`2 . D e t t l i , L., Medical C l i n i c s of North America,
`58:977, 1974.
`3. B e n n e t t , W.M., S i n g e r , L., and Coggins, C . J . ,
`S.A.M.A., =:1544,
`1974.
`
`4 . R . J . Anderson, J.G. Gambertoglio, and R.W. S c h r i e r ,
`C l i n i c a l U s e of Drugs i n Renal F a i l u r e , Thomas,
`S p r i n g f i e l d , I l l . , 1976.
`
`Downloaded by [Margaret Smith] at 08:27 07 March 2016
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2023
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 6
`
`

`
`318
`
`RELDENBFXG AND DRAYER
`
`-
`5. Reidenberg, M.M., C l i n i c a l Nephrology, 4:83, 1975.
`6 . P i e r i d e s , A.M., Alvarez-Ude, F., Kerr, D.N.S.,
`and S k i l l e n , A.W., L a n c e t , 2:1279, 1975.
`7. E l i o n , G.B., Yu, T., Gutman, A.B., a n d H i t c h i n g s ,
`G.H., A m e r . J . Med., %:69, 1968.
`-
`8 , Adam, WY.R., a n d Dawborn, J . K . , Aust. Ann. Med.,
`19:250, 1970.
`9. S z e t o , H,, I n t u r r i s i , C . , Houde, R . , S a a l , S.,
`-
`Ckeigh, J . , a n d Reidenberg, M , C l i n . R e s . , 24:
`258.4, 1976.
`10, Drayer, DOE., Reidenberg, M O M s 9 a n d Sevy, R.W.,
`P r o c . SOC. Exper. B i o l . Med., 146~358, 1974.
`A . J . , Jr., C l i n . Pharmacol. T h e r . , - 17:134, 1975.
`11. E l s o n , J , , S t r o n g , J . M . , L e e , W.-K.,
`and A t k i n s o n ,
`1 2 . L e e , W.-K.,
`S t r o n g , J . M . , Kehoe, R.F., D u t c h e r ,
`-
`JoS., a n d A t k i n s o n , A . J . , Jr., C l i n . Pharmacol.
`T h e r . , P9:508, 1976.
`13. Drayer, D.E., Lowenthal, D.T., Woosley, R.L.
`N i e s , A.S., Schwartz, A.,
`and Reidenberg, M.M.,
`A b s t r a c t s , N i n t h Annual Meeting of American
`S o c i e t y of Nephrology, 1976, p. 11.
`1 4 . D r a y e r , D.E., C l i n i c a l P h a r m a c o k i n e t i c s ,
`
`i n p r e s s .
`
`Downloaded by [Margaret Smith] at 08:27 07 March 2016
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2023
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01565
`Page 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket