throbber
[Frontiers in Bioscience 13, 3648-3660, May 1, 2008]
`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) and related molecules in type 2 diabetes
`
`Peter R Flatt1, Clifford J Bailey2, Brian D Green3
`
`1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, UK, 2School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University,
`Birmingham, UK, 3School of Biological Sciences, Queens University Belfast, UK
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`1. Abstract
`2. Introduction
`3. DPP IV and related enzymes
`3.1. DPP IV (EC 3.4.14.5)
`3.2. Dipeptidyl peptidase II (DPP II)
`3.3. Dipeptidyl peptidase 8 (DPP 8) and dipeptidyl peptidase 9 (DPP 9)
`3.4. Fibroblast Activation protein (FAP)
`4. The incretin hormones, DPP IV and diabetes
`4.1. The incretins
`4.2. Inactivation of the incretins by DPP IV
`4.3. Overcoming DPP IV mediated incretin inactivation
`4.4. Rodent models lacking DPP IV activity
`5. Inhibitors of DPP IV activity
`5.1. Preclinical studies
`5.2. Clinical studies
`5.2.1. Sitagliptin
`5.2.2. Vildagliptin and other gliptins
`5.3. Developmental issues
`5.4. Future outlook for DPP IV inhibitors
`6. Conclusions
`7. Acknowledgements
`7. References
`
`1. ABSTRACT
`
`2. INTRODUCTION
`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) is a widely
`distributed physiological enzyme
`that can be found
`solubilized in blood, or membrane-anchored in tissues.
`DPP IV and related dipeptidase enzymes cleave a wide
`range of physiological peptides and have been associated
`with several disease processes including Crohn’s disease,
`chronic liver disease, osteoporosis, multiple sclerosis,
`eating disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, and of direct
`relevance to this review, type 2 diabetes. Here, we place
`particular emphasis on two peptide substrates of DPP IV
`with insulin-releasing and antidiabetic actions namely,
`glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent
`insulinotropic polypeptide
`(GIP). The
`rationale
`for
`inhibiting DPP IV activity in type 2 diabetes is that it
`decreases peptide cleavage and
`thereby enhances
`endogenous incretin hormone activity. A multitude of novel
`DPP IV inhibitor compounds have now been developed and
`tested. Here we examine the information available on DPP
`IV and related enzymes, review recent preclinical and
`clinical data for DPP IV inhibitors, and assess their clinical
`significance.
`
` Two primary defects in the pathogenesis of type
`2 diabetes are a relative loss of insulin secretion from
`pancreatic beta cells and a decreased sensitivity of liver and
`peripheral tissues to insulin (1). Drug treatments for type 2
`diabetes have centred therefore on enhancing insulin
`secretion and action. In the case of sulphonylureas (e.g.
`glibenclamide) and meglitinides (e.g. nateglinide) insulin
`secretion
`is
`increased from
`the pancreas (2). The
`biguanides (e.g. metformin) and thiazolidinediones (e.g.
`pioglitazone) improve the body’s sensitivity to insulin (3-
`5). Additionally, synthetic insulin and insulin analogues
`can be administered when oral drugs are no longer
`sufficient to provide adequate blood glucose control.
`
`the
`in particular
`Insulin secretagogues and
`sulphonylureas suffer from a lack of glucose-dependency
`which can lead to episodes of hypoglycaemia (6). Also, as
`the disease progresses and beta-cell function declines,
`several years of use often
`lead
`to declining drug
`effectiveness. With the prevalence of type 2 diabetes
`reaching epidemic proportions (predicted to be about 350
`
`3648
`
`Mylan EX 1011, Page 1
`
`

`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV and diabetes
`
`Figure 1. N-terminal cleavage activity and substrate
`specificity of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV). DPP IV
`cleaves dipeptides from the N-terminus of peptides and
`polypeptides which have either a proline or an alanine
`residue in the penultimate position (examples of which can
`be found in Table 1). Xaa represents one of the 20
`proteinogenic amino acids.
`
`million by 2025, (7)) new antidiabetic drug treatments are
`urgently required. Incretin hormones are peptides secreted
`from endocrine cells in the small intestine which stimulate
`significant insulin secretion at physiological concentrations
`in a glucose-dependent manner (8-12). The two principal
`incretin hormones are glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and
`glucose dependent
`insulinotropic polypeptide
`(GIP).
`Expanding knowledge of the incretin hormones and their
`physiological inactivation by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP
`IV) has lead to two new classes of antidiabetic drugs,
`incretin analogues/mimetics and DPP IV inhibitors/gliptins.
`In this article we focus on the enzyme DPP IV and the
`progress made towards the development of DPP IV
`inhibitors.
`
`3. DPP IV AND RELATED ENZYMES
`
`3.1. DPP IV (EC 3.4.14.5)
`DPP IV is classified as a serine protease by virtue
`of the classical consensus motif Gly-Xxx-Ser-Xxx-Gly,
`which is Gly628-Trp629-Ser630-Tyr631-Gly632 in the case of
`human DPP IV (13). DPP IV was one of the earliest
`identified prolyl peptidases and over the years DPP IV has
`become one of the most intensively studied of its class (14).
`The proteolytic activity of DPP IV is relatively selective,
`cleaving only peptide bonds following proline or alanine
`amino acid residues located penultimate to the N-terminus
`(14; See Figure 1) (this also commonly occurs at sites
`following serine (See Table 1)). DPP IV is also the
`lymphocyte cell surface protein CD26 discussed in detail in
`other reviews (15). Structural studies with soluble human
`DPP IV reveal that the inhibitor diprotin A covalently
`bonds to Ser630 in the catalytic triad, irreversibly blocking
`the active site (13). Physiologically the role of DPP IV is
`wide ranging since it is capable of interacting with a
`number of diverse proteins such as collagen (16),
`fibronectin (17), adenosine deaminase (18),
`tyrosine
`
`3649
`
`phosphatase CD45 (19), and a plethora of regulatory
`peptides across a range of physiological systems (20-22).
`Table 1 lists many physiological peptide substrates (or
`potential substrates) of DPP IV showing N-terminal regions
`targeted by the enzyme.
`
` DPP IV is expressed by endothelia and epithelia
`in most tissues, including bone marrow, kidney, intestine,
`pancreas, liver, lymphocytes, placenta, uterus, prostate and
`skin (14). Levels and expression and activity of DPP IV in
`certain tissues and blood plasma are known to vary
`significantly following the onset of disease, injury or
`inflammation
`(reviewed elsewhere 14, 22). Peptide
`substrates of DPP IV have such extensive physiological
`implications, that most body systems are likely to be
`affected including nervous, endocrine, neuroendocrine,
`immune, vascular, digestive, skeletal and reproductive
`systems (see substrates in Table 1). Among the most
`commonly recognized substrates of DPP IV are several
`chemokines that affect the immune system: (RANTES,
`eotaxin, IP-10, MCP-1, MCP-2, MCP-3, SDF-1α, SDF-1β,
`GCP-2 and MDC, see Table 1 (20); several neuropeptides:
`substance P, bradykinin, peptide YY (PYY), neuropeptide
`Y (NPY), and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide
`(PACAP) (20); and glucagon,
`the counter-regulatory
`hormone of insulin (23). As we shall see later in this
`review, much attention has been focused towards the
`incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP as substrates of DPP IV.
`Considered briefly below are other physiological proteases
`related to DPP IV which possess similar post-proline
`aminopeptidase activity.
`
`3.2. Dipeptidyl peptidase II (DPP II, also known as DPP
`7, or quiescent cell proline dipeptidase (QPP) (E.C.
`3.4.14.2)
`
`Evidence in recent years has suggested that three
`earlier identified proteases DPP II, DPP 7 and QPP are in
`fact the same enzyme (24-26). Discovered in 1968 by the
`extraction of Lys-Ala- hydrolytic activity from the anterior
`pituitary, DPP II appears to be widely distributed across a
`range of mammalian tissues (24, 27). The identification of
`physiological substrates of DPP II has been hindered by
`low purification yields from
`tissue and a
`lack of
`information
`regarding
`the molecular and catalytic
`properties. Although there are no totally selective DPP II
`inhibitors available, compounds such as Ala-ψ[CS-N]-Pyrr
`and Ala-ψ[CS-N]-Thia have more selectivity towards DPP
`II than DPP IV (28).
`
`3.3. Dipeptidyl peptidase 8 (DPP 8) and dipeptidyl
`peptidase 9 (DPP 9)
`DPP 8 and DPP 9 are relative newcomers to the
`DPP IV enzyme family and their inadvertent inhibition
`appears to be responsible for at least some of the toxic side-
`effects of DPP
`IV
`inhibitors
`including alopecia,
`thrombocytopenia, anaemia, enlarged spleen, and multiple
`histological pathologies,
`including skin
`lesions and
`premature mortality in animals (29, 30). DPP 8 and 9 are
`monomeric
`soluble
`cytoplasmic
`enzymes
`sharing
`approximately 50% sequence similarity with human DPP
`IV (14). Like DPP IV they are widely distributed across
`human tissues and although they have not yet been
`
`Mylan EX 1011, Page 2
`
`

`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV and diabetes
`
`Table 1. Physiological regulatory peptides identified as substrates of DPP IV
`Physiological System
`Peptide
`Nutrient metabolism and glucose
`GLP-1 (7-36)amide
`homeostasis
`GIP (1-42)
`GLP-1 (7-37)
`Glucagon
`GLP-2 (1-33)
`Trypsinogen
`
`Digestive system
`
`Trypsinogen pro-peptide
`Gastrin releasing peptide (GRP)
`Pro-colipase
`Enterostatin
`β-Casomorphin
`Aprotinin
`Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)
`Growth hormone releasing factor (GHRF)
`Growth hormone-releasing hormone
`(GRH (1-29))
`GRH (1-44)
`PACAP (1-27)
`PACAP (1-38)
`Substance P
`Neuropeptide Y
`Peptide YY (1-36)
`Enkephalins
`Corticotropin-like intermediate lobe peptide
`Endomorphin-2
`Bradykinin
`Human chorionic gonadotrophin α (hCGα)
`Leutinising hormone α chain (LHα)
`Prolactin
`Interleukin-2
`Interleukin-1β
`α1-Microglobulin
`RANTES
`Granulocyte chemtactic protein-2 (GCP-2)
`Stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α)
`SDF-1β
`Macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC)
`Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1)
`MCP-2
`MCP-3
`Eotaxin
`Interferon-γ-inducible protein-10 (IP-10)
`Thyrotropin α
`Vasostatin-1
`Peptide histidine methionine
`Tyr-Melanostatin
`
`Growth and development
`
`Neuroendocrine system
`
`Nervous system
`
`Vascular system
`Reproductive system
`
`Immune system
`
`Endocrine system
`
`Other
`
`N-terminus
`His-Ala-Glu-
`Tyr-Ala-Asp-
`His-Ala-Glu-
`His-Ser-Gln-
`His-Ala-Asp-
`Phe-Pro-Thr-
`
`Phe-Pro-Thr-
`Val-Pro-Leu-
`Val-Pro-Asp-
`Val-Pro-Asp-
`Tyr-Pro-Phe-
`Arg-Pro-Asp-
`Gly-Pro-Glu-
`Tyr-Ala-Glu-
`Tyr-Ala-Asp-
`
`Tyr-Ala-Asp-
`His-Ser-Asp-
`His-Ser-Asp-
`Arg-Pro-Lys-
`Tyr-Pro-Ser-
`Tyr-Pro-Ile
`Tyr-Pro-Val-
`Arg-Pro-Val-
`Tyr-Pro-Phe-
`Arg-Pro-Pro-
`Ala-Pro-Asp-
`Phe-Pro-Asn-
`Thr-Pro-Val-
`Ala-Pro-Thr-
`Ala-Pro-Val-
`Gly-Pro-Val-
`Ser-Pro-Tyr-
`Gly-Pro-Val-
`Lys-Pro-Val-
`Lys-Pro-Val-
`Gly-Pro-Tyr-
`Glu-Pro-Asp-
`Glu-Pro-Asp-
`Glu-Pro-Val-
`Gly-Pro-Ala-
`Val-Pro-Leu-
`Phe-Pro-Asp-
`Leu-Pro-Val-
`His-Ala-Asp-
`Tyr-Pro-Leu-
`
`assigned any particular biological function, the undesirable
`consequences of unselective DPP IV inhibition may
`provide important clues. Their post-proline aminopeptidase
`activity has been evidenced by the hydrolysis of H-Ala-
`Pro- and H-Gly-Pro derived substrates (31). Selective
`inhibitors of DPP 8 and DPP 9 are already available and
`have been used to characterise DPP8/9 activity in human
`leukocytes (32).
`
`3.4. Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)
`The DPP IV-like activity of FAP has been
`confirmed by the rapid cleavage of an Ala-Pro-NH F3 Mec
`substrate (33). FAP has 52% sequence similarity to DPP IV
`and has been linked with liver injury and chronic liver
`disease (31, 33). FAP is not as widely expressed as DPP
`IV and has been identified in serum and pancreatic alpha
`cells. The active site which carries out N-terminal dipeptide
`cleavage also possesses collagenolytic activity degrading
`
`gelatine and type 1 collagen (34). Selective fluorescent
`probes have been developed to detect and differentiate
`between the proteolytic activities of FAP and DPP IV (35).
`
`4. THE INCRETIN HORMONES, DPP IV AND
`DIABETES
`
`4.1. The incretins
` Although the concept of targeting DPP IV in
`type 2 diabetes is relatively recent, the origin can be traced
`back to early work establishing the importance of the gut in
`regulating post-prandial glucose homeostasis (36, 37). The
`gut contributes neural and endocrine signals that account
`for the enhanced physiological insulin response after a
`meal, a signalling pathway known as the enteroinsular axis
`(36, 37). GLP-1 and GIP secreted from intestinal L- and K-
`cells, respectively, account for most of the enteroinsular (or
`“incretin”) effect (38-42). A list of well characterised
`
`3650
`
`Mylan EX 1011, Page 3
`
`

`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV and diabetes
`
`actions of GLP-1 and GIP relevant to type 2 diabetes can
`be found in Table 2. The glucose-dependent nature of their
`insulinotropic activity provides a clear advantage to
`enhance postprandial insulin secretion and reduce the risk
`of interprandial hypoglycaemia (8-10). Insulin biosynthesis
`is also increased. Furthermore, GLP-1 and GIP possess
`extrapancreatic mechanisms which contribute to limit
`hyperglycaemia, e.g. reducing hepatic insulin extraction
`(43, 44), reported ‘insulin-like’ effects on skeletal muscle,
`liver and adipose tissue (45-49), and a reduction of gastric
`acid secretion or gastric emptying (50-52). Incretin
`hormones have additional potential benefits over other
`insulin-releasing drugs through improved islet morphology
`and protective and proliferative effects on the pancreatic
`beta-cell (53-59). Such properties might help to counter the
`characteristic age-related decline of beta-cell mass in
`diabetes. Although these properties are evident in animal
`models, substantiating effects of incretin hormones on beta-
`cell morphology in humans remains problematic. Finally,
`an important yet occasionally overlooked effect is the
`suppression of glucagon secretion by GLP-1 (60).
`
`4.2. Inactivation of the incretins by DPP IV
`Mentlein and co-workers were amongst the first
`to demonstrate degradation of GLP-1 and GIP by DPP IV
`in vitro (61). Using DPP IV purified from human placenta
`they observed the enzymatic removal of N-terminal
`dipeptides His7-Ala8 and Tyr1-Ala2 from GLP-1 and GIP,
`respectively. More significantly, they observed that this
`degradation also took place when GLP-1 and GIP were
`incubated in human serum (61). It was subsequently
`confirmed that DPP IV-mediated metabolism of GLP-1 and
`GIP did indeed occur in vivo (40, 62). The action of DPP
`IV in vivo reduces the half-life of GLP-1 and GIP to <2
`min (40, 62, 63). Since the predominant and active forms of
`incretin hormones are GLP-1(7-36)amide and GIP(1-42),
`degradation by DPP IV leads to major degradation
`fragments GLP-1(9-36)amide and GIP(3-42), respectively.
`
`The activities and binding characteristics of these
`fragments have been elucidated. Since GLP-1(9-36)amide
`and GIP(3-42) are both non-insulinotropic peptides, it was
`initially suggested that these were relatively inert and
`inactive metabolites (64, 65). Although the affinity of GLP-
`1(9-36)amide for the GLP-1 receptor is 100-fold lower than
`the parent molecule it appears to act as a weak receptor
`antagonist (64, 66, 67). While GLP-1(9-36)amide does not
`antagonise the insulinotropic activity of GLP-1(7-36)amide
`in vivo, there is evidence that this metabolite possesses
`weak antihyperglycaemic activity through a mechanism not
`involving insulin secretion (68). This concept currently
`remains controversial due to conflicting findings in mice,
`pigs and humans (68-70).
`
`The receptor affinity of GIP fairs comparatively
`better following truncation by DPP IV. The binding affinity
`of GIP(3-42) is approximately 4-fold lower than that of
`GIP(1-42) (71). In vitro studies have demonstrated that
`GIP(3-42) antagonises the GIP receptor (72, 73). However,
`in vivo studies have been conflicting (70-73). A recent
`study confirmed that GIP(3-42) antagonises GIP-stimulated
`cAMP production and insulin secretion, but found that in
`
`vivo it does not behave as an antagonist at physiological
`concentrations (71). However, pharmacological doses of
`GIP(3-42) (25 nmol/kg) administered to obese diabetic
`(ob/ob) mice once daily for 14 days enhanced insulin
`sensitivity and improved glycaemic control (70). This
`appears to involve extrapancreatic mechanisms which lead
`to improved insulin sensitivity. During this study neither
`GIP(3-42) or GLP-1(9-36)amide affected body weight,
`food intake, pancreatic insulin content or islet morphology
`(70).
`
`4.3. Overcoming DPP IV mediated incretin inactivation
`As knowledge of incretin hormone inactivation
`expanded greater emphasis was placed on ways
`to
`overcome this problem. The pharmacological strategies
`adopted have led to the development of two fundamentally
`new ways to treat type 2 diabetes. The first approach has
`involved generating GLP-1 and GIP agonists resistant to
`the action of DPP IV (reviewed elsewhere (74)).
`Production and testing of numerous modified forms of the
`incretin hormones have generated effective DPP IV-
`resistant analogues of GLP-1 and GIP (74). In human
`subjects GLP-1 analogues have demonstrated sustained
`improvements in glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. To
`date one GLP-1 agonist, exendin (exenatide/Byetta), has
`been clinically approved, and another, liraglutide (NN2211)
`is in phase III clinical trials (75). A second and more
`recently adopted approach, which is the focus of this
`review, has been the development of DPP IV inhibitors (22,
`76, 77). As illustrated in Figure 2 the concept of DPP IV
`inhibitors is to enhance endogenous incretin activity by
`preventing the rapid inactivation of incretin hormones. The
`preclinical and clinical data for DPP IV inhibitors (or
`‘gliptins’ as they are termed) is reviewed later in this
`article.
`
`4.4. Rodent models lacking DPP IV activity
`lacking
`The generation of
`rodent models
`functional DPP IV has brought major advances in our
`understanding of this enzyme’s role in metabolism, and has
`strengthened the rationale for developing specific inhibitors
`of DPP IV (78-81). Of particular note is the fact that mice
`lacking DPP IV activity have significantly reduced
`glycaemic excursions, greater levels of glucose-stimulated
`insulin, while the degradation of both GLP-1 and GIP is
`reduced (78). Similarly, DPP IV-deficient rats have
`improved glucose tolerance, enhanced insulin release and
`higher levels of active GLP-1 (79). Evidence gathered from
`these rodent models underpins the role of DPP IV in
`regulating
`incretin activity and consequently glucose
`homeostasis.
`
`IV
`that DPP
`interesting
`is especially
` It
`‘knockout’ mice are relatively resistant to the development
`of glucose intolerance and diabetes following 20 weeks on
`a high fat diet (80). These mice exhibited reduced food
`intake and enhanced metabolic energy expenditure and did
`not develop obesity (80). This has been substantiated by
`similar observations in DPP IV-deficient Fischer rats (81).
`Furthermore, DPP IV ‘knockout’ appears
`to confer
`protection from the diabetogenic effects of modest amounts
`of the beta-cell toxin streptozotocin (80).
`
`3651
`
`Mylan EX 1011, Page 4
`
`

`
`[Frontiers in Bioscience 13, 3648-3647, May 1, 2008]
`
`Table 2. Characterised actions of GLP-1 and GIP relevant to type 2 diabetes
`
`Released in response to a mixed meal
`Lower blood glucose
`Glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion
`Suppress glucagon secretion
`Extrapancreatic glucose-lowering actions
`Extend beta cell mass and survival
`Suppress gastric acid secretion
`Inhibition of gastric emptying
`Inhibition of hepatic insulin extraction
`Enhance satiety
`Reduce body weight
`
`Effect
`√
`√
`√
`√
`√
`√
`-
`√
`√
`√
`√
`
`GLP-1
`
`Reference
`111, 112
`113
`8
`60
`45-47
`53-56
`
`-
`
`50, 51
`43
`116
`117
`
`GIP
`
`Effect
`√
`√
`√
`-
`√
`√
`√
`-
`√
`-
`-
`
`Ref
`111, 112
`114, 115
`9, 10
`-
`48, 49
`57-59
`52
`-
`44
`-
`-
`
`Figure 2. Incretin hormone inactivation and DPP IV inhibitor mode of action. The incretin hormones (GLP-1 and GIP) are
`released from the intestine following meal ingestion. Incretins circulate to the pancreas where they stimulate insulin-release
`leading to a lowering of plasma glucose concentrations. However, enzymatic cleavage by ubiquitous DPP IV renders them non-
`insulinotropic. DPP IV inhibitors prevent processing by DPP IV and therefore enhance endogenous incretin hormone activity.
`
`lacking DPP IV
` Although, animal models
`activity are viable and appear relatively normal, recent
`evidence is emerging of some neurological, immunological
`and inflammatory alterations (82-87). Mice lacking DPP IV
`have shortened latencies to nociceptive stimuli, perhaps due
`to observed higher plasma levels of substance P (82). In the
`context of experimental asthma, rats lacking DPP IV
`demonstrate decreased T-cell recruitment associated with
`significantly reduced ovalbumin-specific IgE-titres (83).
`Furthermore, marked changes in the cytokine responses of
`
`interleukins and tumour necrosis factor have been observed
`(84; 85). DPP IV deficient rats are more susceptible to
`angiooedema caused by ACE inhibitor administration (86)
`and it has been reported that DPP IV inhibition in some
`species (e.g. dogs and monkeys) cause gastrointestinal
`disturbances and skin lesions, although these remain to be
`confirmed (31). Finally, the severity of antigen-induced
`arthritis is increased in DPP IV-deficient mice which may
`be due to increased levels of circulating active stromal cell-
`derived factor-1 (87).
`
`3652
`
`Mylan EX 1011, Page 5
`
`

`
`[Frontiers in Bioscience 13, 3648-3647, May 1, 2008]
`
`Company
`
`Clinical Phase
`
`Specificity data
`
`Table 3. DPP IV inhibitors in clinical development
`(Proprietary
`Inhibitor
`(reference
`Generic
`name
`number)
`name)
`Sitagliptina (Januvia)
`IC50 = 18 nM Ki = 9 nM
`4
`Merck
`MK-0431
`Vildagliptinb (Galvus)
`IC50 = 3.5 nM Ki = 17 nM
`3
`Novartis
`LAF237
`IC50 = 26nM Ki = <1 nM
`3
`Bristol-Myers Squib and AstraZeneca
`BMS-477118
`Saxagliptin
`-
`3
`Takeda
`SYR-322
`Alogliptin
`Ki = 0.1 nM
`2
`Roche
`R1438
`Aminomethylpyridine deivative
`Ki = 80 nM
`2
`Probiodrug
`P32/98
`Isoleucine thiazolidide
`-
`2
`Prosidion
`PSN9301
`-
`IC50 = 1.6 nM
`2
`Glenmark
`GRC-8200
`Carbazole compound
`-
`2
`Phenomix
`PHX-1149
`-
`-
`1
`Sanofi-Aventis
`SSR-162369
`Pyrrolidinoxanthine derivative
`-
`1
`Alantos/Amgen
`ALS 2-0426
`-
`-
`?
`NovoNordisk
`NN-7201
`-
`a Sitagliptin was launched in Mexico in 2006, and in USA, UK and several other European countries in 2007, b A New Drug
`Application (NDA) for vildagliptin was submitted to FDA (American Food and Drug Administration) and EMEA (European
`Medicines Evaluation Agency) in 2006, ‘-’ = information not available.
`
`5. INHIBITORS OF DPP IV ACTIVITY
`
`5.1. Preclinical studies
`In the late 1990s the first DPP IV inhibitors were
`developed and tested in animal models of type 2 diabetes.
`One of
`the
`initial studies demonstrated
`that oral
`administration of P32/98
`(isoleucine
`thiazolidide),
`improved glucose tolerance in Zucker fatty rats (88). The
`effectiveness of another inhibitor vildagliptin (LAF-237) to
`control glycaemia was similarly demonstrated (89). These
`studies indicated that effects were dose-dependent and
`caused no tachyphylaxis over the 3 weeks treatment period
`(89). NVP-DPP728 similarly improved glucose tolerance
`and the mechanism was verified by the presence of higher
`plasma levels of GLP-1(7-36)amide (90). In high fat fed
`mice, valine-pyrrolidide potentiated the plasma insulin
`response to intra-gastric glucose and improved glucose
`tolerance (91). Interestingly, valine-pyrrolidide did not
`affect glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from isolated
`islets, suggesting the mechanism was indirect, although
`enhancement of GLP-1 (91) and GIP (92) activity was
`confirmed. Investigation of DPP IV inhibitor in isolated
`perfused porcine ileum revealed that active levels of
`secreted GLP-1 could be increased from ~50% to over 85%
`(93).
`
`Chronic treatment (12 weeks) of Zucker rats with
`P32/98 improved glucose tolerance and increased plasma
`insulin levels, but did not lead to any measurable changes
`in beta cell mass or islet morphology (94). P32/98 reduced
`body weight gain, an effect which was associated with
`GLP-1 activity, but there was no change in food intake. An
`almost identical P32/98 study indicated that hepatic and
`peripheral insulin sensitivity was significantly improved
`(95).
`
`Preclinical studies have also demonstrated that
`DPP IV inhibitors are most effective in mild to moderate
`models of diabetes but fail to control glycaemia in severely
`hyperglycaemic mice (79, 96). The effects of DPP IV
`inhibitors in combination with other antidiabetic drugs have
`been examined in diabetic mouse models. Combining
`vildagliptin with rosiglitazone did not provide any
`additional efficacy to rosiglitazone alone, but it did appear
`to reduce common side-effects such as weight gain and
`haemodilution (96). Studies combining a DPP IV inhibitor
`
`with an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor have demonstrated
`additive improvements of glucose tolerance and increased
`active GLP-1 levels (97).
`
`5.2. Clinical studies
`Following the encouraging results of studies in
`animal models, there is now a substantial list of DPP IV
`inhibitors in clinical development with at least 8 others at
`earlier stages (Table 3). These have received the class
`name of ‘gliptins’ or ‘incretin enhancers’ (21, 30, 77, 98).
`The first gliptin to be approved for clinical use and
`marketed as a treatment for type 2 diabetes is sitagliptin
`(Januvia), launched in Mexico in 2006, and in the USA and
`several European countries in 2007. Vildagliptin (Galvus)
`was submitted for evaluation by the regulatory agencies in
`2006. Two further gliptins, saxagliptin and alogliptin, are
`advanced in phase III clinical development.
`
`As discussed above, the antidiabetic effect of
`DPP IV inhibitors relates mainly to increased nutrient-
`stimulated (prandial) insulin secretion. This is particularly
`effective in lowering postprandial hyperglycaemia, but
`there is a substantial carry-over effect to benefit the control
`of interprandial glycaemia (21, 77, 98). However, DPP IV
`inhibitors do not increase basal insulin secretion, and only
`suppress glucagon secretion in the hyperglycaemic state, so
`there
`is
`low risk of
`interprandial ‘over-shoot’
`into
`hypoglycaemia. To assess overall long-term glycaemic
`control in diabetic patients it is customary to measure the
`percentage of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c): the normal
`range is <6.0%, and the target for treatment of diabetic
`patients is usually to achieve a sustained HbA1c < 6.5-
`7.5% depending on country and regional guidelines.
`
`5.2.1. Sitagliptin
`Sitagliptin is a piperazine derivative with a high
`(~87%) bioavailability, rapid absorption in man (Tmax 1-
`4h) and low (~38%) plasma protein binding. Near
`complete inhibition of DPP IV activity for about 12h is
`achieved in man with a single daily dose of 100 mg.
`Clinical trials to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety
`of sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes patients have recently been
`reported (98, 99). The long-term effects on HbA1c when
`sitagliptin is administered as monotherapy or add-on
`therapy to certain other types of antidiabetic agents are
`listed in Table 4 (100-104). Sitagliptin typically reduced
`
`3653
`
`Mylan EX 1011, Page 6
`
`

`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV and diabetes
`
`RDBPC
`
`24
`
`741
`
`Table 4. Long-term (>24 weeks) clinical trials with the DPP IV inhibitor sitagliptin (Januvia) in patients with type 2 diabetes
`Study design
`Duration (weeks)
`n
`Dose (mg/day)
`Other antidiabetic
`Mean
`Baseline
`Placebo subtracted decrease
`Ref
`treatment
`HbA1c
`in HbA1c
`Diet only
`8.0 %
`↓ 0.79 %
`100
`Diet only
`8.0 %
`↓ 0.94 %
`200
`101
`Diet + metformin
`7.96 %
`↓ 0.65 %
`100
`701
`24
`RDBPC
`102
`Diet + pioglitazone
`8.05 %
`↓ 0.70 %
`100
`353
`24
`RDBPC
`340a
`103
`Diet only
`8.8 %
`↓ 0.83 %
`100
`24
`RDBPC
`104
`Diet + metformin
`7.5%
`↓ 0.67 %
`100
`1,172
`52
`RDBAC
`Adapted with permission from 98, aNumber is the diet+placebo and the diet+sitagliptin arms only, bSame decrease in HbA1c
`(0.67%) for diet+metformin+sitagliptin as for diet+metformin+glipizide. RDBPC = randomised double blind placebo control.
`RDBAC = randomised double blind active comparator.
`
`100
`
`52
`24
`
`24
`52
`24
`
`RDBPC
`RDBAC
`RDBPC
`
`107
`463
`
`607b
`780
`544
`
`Table 5. Long-term (>24 weeks) clinical trials with the DPP IV inhibitor vildagliptin (Galvus) in patients with type 2 diabetes
`Study
`Duration (weeks)
`n
`Dose
`Other antidiabetic
`Mean
`Baseline
`Placebo
`subtracted
`Ref
`design
`(mg/day)
`treatment
`HbA1c
`decrease in HbA1c
`RDBPC
`100
`Diet + metformin
`7.7 %
`↓ 1.1 %
`8.7 %a
`RDBPC
`50
`Diet + pioglitazone
`↓ 0.8 %
`8.7 %a
`100
`Diet + pioglitazone
`↓ 1.0 %
`100
`Diet only
`8.7 %
`↓ 1.1 %
`↓ 1.0 %c
`100
`Diet + metformin
`8.7 %
`50
`Diet + metformin
`≥7.4 %
`↓ 0.7 %
`100
`Diet + metformin
`↓ 1.1 %
`Adapted with permission from 98, aApproximate HbA1c value estimated from illustration, bNumber is the diet+placebo and the
`diet+vildagliptin arms only, cDecrease in HbA1c was 1.0% diet+vildagliptin versus 1.4% for diet+metformin. RDBPC =
`randomised double blind placebo control. RDBAC = randomised double blind active comparator.
`
`105
`106
`
`107,108
`109
`110
`
`HbA1c (from a baseline of ~ 8%) by about 0.7 – 0.8% after
`24-52 weeks. Efficacy was similar whether the sitagliptin was
`taken as monotherapy or add-on therapy to metformin or a
`thiazolidinedione. In these trials fasting plasma glucose
`concentrations were reduced by about 1.0 – 1.5 mmol/L, and
`postprandial glucose levels measured 2 hours after a standard
`mixed meal were usually reduced by about 3 mmol/L.
`
`in nutrient-
`increase
`the
`Consistent with
`stimulated (but not basal) insulin secretion, sitagliptin
`therapy did not cause a clinically significant increase in the
`incidence of reported hypoglycaemia in any of the trials.
`Indeed, a combination of sitagliptin + metformin for 52
`weeks was associated with only 4.9% of patients reporting
`hypoglycaemia events compared with 32% of patients
`receiving glipizide + metformin (104). This was achieved
`with similar overall levels of glycaemic control in the two
`groups as indicated by HbA1c. It is also noteworthy that
`[delete space] sitagliptin did not increase body weight
`compared to placebo in any of the trials.
`
`Parameters of tolerability and the adverse events
`profile for sitagliptin were generally similar to the placebo or
`comparator groups in these trials, providing no signals for
`concern in these patient groups over these time periods.
`Despite the potential to slow gastric emptying, this does not
`seem to be a clinical issue as there was little reporting of
`abdominal discomfort or nausea. Patients receiving sitagliptin
`are required to have good renal function since the drug is
`mostly eliminated unchanged in the urine. However, the drug
`does not appear to induce or inhibit P450 isoforms, so it should
`have little effect on the metabolism of other drugs and can be
`used in patients with mild liver disease.
`
`5.2.2. Vildagliptin and other gliptins
`Vildagliptin is a cyanopyrrolidine: absorption is
`rapid, bioavailability is >90%, and there is extensive hepatic
`metabolism of the drug to metabolites that are mostly
`eliminated in the urine. Inhibition of DPP IV by >90% persists
`for more than 12h after a single daily dose of 100 mg, which is
`likely to be the preferred therapeutic dose. Vildagliptin has
`received a similar battery of clinical trials to sitagliptin and
`shown similar results when used as monotherapy or add-on to
`metformin or a thiazolidinedione (105-110; Table 5). Slightly
`greater lowering of HbA1c in some studies with vildagliptin
`may relate in part to a higher baseline (starting) HbA1c. As
`with sitagliptin there was low risk of hypoglycaemia and no
`effect on body weight compared to placebo.
`
`5.3. Developmental issues
`Initial preclinical development of DPP IV inhibitors
`as antidiabetic agents focused on their selectivity: studies in
`rodents, dogs and monkeys have suggested that possible
`interference with DPP 8/9 or other dipeptidyl peptidases could
`cause blood dyscrasias, gastrointestinal disturbances and
`various histopathological changes including skin lesions (29,
`30). Inhibitors of DPP 8/9 have also reduced T-cell activation
`in human in vitro models. However the DPP IV inhibitors
`presently advanced in clinical development have shown highly
`selective and potent inhibition of DPP IV. They have
`exhibited sufficient potency and duration of action that
`therapeutic doses achieved nearly complete inhibition of DPP
`IV activity for >12h with a diminishing effect thereafter.
`
`Although DPP IV inhibition could potentially
`affect a wide range of biological peptides, no apparent
`serious untoward effects have emerged during
`the
`
`3654
`
`Mylan EX 1011, Page 7
`
`

`
`Dipeptidyl peptidase IV and diabetes
`
`and vildagliptin.
`sitagliptin
`trials with
`clinical
`Nevertheless, the urinary metabolites of vildagliptin and
`possible interference with DPP 8/9 are receiving further
`investigation. Available information regarding other
`gliptins such as saxagliptin and alogliptin remain
`preliminary as these agents are proceeding in phase III
`clinical trials. As with all new drugs, phase IV
`pharmacovigilance will watch for any evidence of
`possible long

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket