throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER: 20-357/S019
`
`FINAL PRINTED LABELING
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 1
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 1
`
`

`
`
`
`metlormin elimination. Following oral administration, approximately 90% of the absorbed drug is
`eliminated via the renal route within the first 24 hours, with a plasma elimination hall-life of approx-
`imately 62 hours. In blood, the elimination half-lile is approximately 17.6 hours, suggesting that the
`erythrocyte mass may be a compartment of distribution.
`Special Populations
`Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
`In the presence of normal renal function, there are no differences between single- or multiple~dose
`pharrnacokinetics oi metlormin between patients with type 2 diabetes and normal subjects (see
`Table 1), nor is there any accumulation of metformin in either group at usual clinical doses.
`The pharmacokinetics ol GLUCOPHAGE XR in patients with type 2 diabetes are comparable to
`those in healthy normal adults.
`Renal Insufficiency
`In patients with decreased renal function (based on measured creatinine clearance), the plasma
`and blood half-lite of metformin is prolonged and the renal clearance is decreased in proportion to
`the decrease in creatinine clearance (see Table 1; also see WARNINGS).
`Hepatic Insufficiency
`No phannacokinetic studies ot metlormin have been conducted in patients with hepatic
`insufficiency.
`Geriatrics
`Limited data from controlled pharmacokinetic studies of GLUCOPHAGE in healthy elderly subjects
`suggest mat total plasma clearance of mettorrnin is decreased, the hall-life is prolonged, and Cm“
`is increased, compared to healthy young subjects. From these data, it appears that the change in
`rnetformin pharmacokinetics with aging is primarily accounted for by a change in renal function
`(see Table 1). GLUCOPHAGE and GLUOOPHAGE XR (metlormin hydrochloride extended-release
`tablets) treatment should not be initiated in patients 2 80 years of age unless measurement of cre-
`atinine clearance demonstrates that renal function is not reduced. (See WARNINGS and DOSAGE
`AND ADMINISTRATION.)
`Table 1. Select Mean (:s.o.) Metfonnin Pherrnacoklnetlc Parameters Following
`Single or Multlple Oral Doses of GLUCOPHAGE
`Subject Groups: GLUCOPHAGE
`dose‘ (number at‘ subjects)
`Healthy, nondiebetlc adults:
`500 mg single dose (24)
`850 mg single dose 04)‘!
`850 mg three times daily for
`19 doses’ (9)
`Adults with type 2 diabetes:
`850 mg single dose (23)
`850 mg three times daily for
`19 doses° (9)
`Elderly’, healthy nondiebetic adults:
`850 mg single dose (12)
`Renal-impaired adults:
`850 mg single dose
`Mild (CLc,9 61-90 mUmin) (5)
`Moderate (CL), 31-so ml/min) (4)
`Severe (CLC, 10-30 mL/min) (6)
`
`1.00 (:03:-1)
`1.50 (10.33)
`2.01 (10.42)
`
`2.75 (10.51)
`2.64 (:o.a2)
`1.79 (£1.94)
`
`sou (:1a2)
`552 (1139)
`542 (2173)
`
`1.45 (20.5)
`1 .90 (e062)
`
`3.32 (11.03)
`2.01 (:1.22)
`
`491 (1133)
`550 (1100)
`
`130 (:90)
`
`Rx only
`
`GLUCOPHAGE®
`(metforrnin hydrochloride tablets)
`
`GLUCOPHAGE® XR
`
`(metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets)
`DESCRIPTION
`GLUCOPHAGE‘ (metlormin hydrochloride tablets) and GLUCOPHAGE' XR (metlormin hydrochlo-
`ride extended-release tablets) are oral antihyperglycemic drugs used in the management of type 2
`diabetes. Metformin hydrochloride (N,N-dirnethylimidodicarbonimidic diamide hydrochloride) is not
`chemically or pharmacologically related to any other classes of oral antihyperglycemic agents. The
`structural formula is as shown:
`
`Metformin hydrochloride is a white to off~white crystalline compound with a molecular lorrnula of
`C‘H,1N5-HCI and a molecular weight of 165.63. Metforrnin hydrochloride is freely soluble in water
`and is practically insoluble in acetone, ether, and chloroform. The pKa of metlormin is 12.4. The pH
`of a 1% aqueous solution of metformin hydrochloride is 6.68.
`GLUCOPHAGE tablets contain 500 mg, 850 mg, or 1lX)0 mg of metformin hydrochloride. Each
`tablet contains the inactive ingredients povidone and magnesium stearate. In addition, the coating
`for the 500-rng and 850-mg tablets contains hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (hypromellose) and the
`coating for the 1000-mg contains hydroxypropyl melhylcellulose and polyethylene gycol.
`GLUCOPHAGE XR contains 500 mg of metformin hydrochloride as the active ingredient. Each
`tablet contains the inactive ingredients sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcel-
`lulose, microcrystalline cellulose, and magneeiurn stearate.
`wstem Components and Performance
`GLUCOPHAGE XR tablets comprise a dual hydrophilic polymer matrix system. Metformin hydrochlo-
`ride is combined with a dmg relewe controlling polymer to form an "inner" phase, which is then incor-
`porated as discrete particles into an “external” phase of a second polymer. After administration, fluid
`from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract enters the tablet causing the polymers to hydrate and swel. Drug is
`nloasedslomyhunthedosagefambyaprocessofdiflusionttwouglthegelmatrixthatisessen-
`tially hdependent of pH. The hydrated polymer system is not rigid and is expected to be broken up by
`normal peristalsis in the GI tract. The biologically inert components ol the tablet may occasionally
`remain intact dining GI transit and will be elirrinated in the feces as a soft, hydrated mass.
`CLINICAL PNARMACOLOGY
`Mechanism of Action
`Mettorrnin is an antihyperglycemic agent which improves glucose tolerance in patients with type 2
`diabetes, lowering both basal and postprandial plasma glucose. Its pharmacologic mechanisms of
`action are different from other classes of oral antihypergycsmic agents. Metlormin decreases
`hepatic glucose production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose, and improves insulin sen-
`sitivity by increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. Unlike sulfonylureae, metlormin
`cloee not produce hypoglycemia in either patients with type 2 diabetes or normal subjects (except
`in special circumstances, see PRECAUTIONS) and does not cause hyperinsulinemia. With met-
`fonnin therapy, insulin secretion remains unchanged while fasting insulin levels and day-long plas-
`ma insulin response may actually decrease.
`Pharrnacokinetics
`Absorption and Bloaveilabillty
`The absolute bioavailability of a GLUCOPHAGE 500-mg tablet given under fasting conditions is
`approximately 50-00%. Studies using single oral doses of GLUCOPHAGE 500 mg to 1500 mg, and
`850 mg to 2550 mg, indicate that there is a lack of dose proportionality with increasing doses, which
`is due to decreased absorption rather than an alteration in elimination. Food decreases the extent of
`and slightly delays the absorption of metformin, as shown by approximately a 40% lower mean peak
`plasma concentration (Cmx), a 2596 lower area under the plasma concentration versus time curve
`(AUC). and a 35 minute prolongation of lime to peak plasma concentration (Tmu) following adminis-
`tration ol a single 850-mg tablet of rnetformin with food, compared to the same tablet strength admin-
`istered testing. The clinical relevance of these decreases is unknown.
`Following a single oral dose of GLUCOPHAGE XR, Cm“ is achieved with a median value of 7 hours
`and a range ol 4 hours to 8 hours. Peek plasma levels are approximately 20% lower compared to
`the same dose of GLUCOPHAGE, however, the extent of absorption (as measured by AUC) is sim-
`ilar to GLUCOPHAGE.
`At steady state, the AUC and Cm" are less than dose proportional for GLUCOPHAGE XR within the
`range 01500 mg to 2000 mg administered once daily. Peak plasma levels are approximately 0.6, 1.1,
`1.4, and 1.8 pg/mL for 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 mg once-daily doses, respectively. The extent of
`metformin absorption (as measured by AUC) from GLUCOPHAGE XFI at a ZCDO mg once-daily dose
`is similar to the same total daily dose administered as GLUCOPHAGE tablets 1000 mg twice daily.
`After repeated administration at GLUCOPHAGE XR, metlormin did not accunulate in plasma.
`Within-subject variability in Cm“ and AUC ol metlormin from GLUCOPHAGE XR is comparable to
`that with GLUCOPHAGE.
`Although the extent of metlormin absorption (as measured by AUG‘) from the GLUCOPHAGE XFI
`tablet increased by approximately 50% when given with food, there was no effect of food on 0,“,
`and Tm“ of metlormin. Both high and low tat meals had the same effect on the phannacokinetice
`of GLUCOPHAGE XR.
`Distribution
`The apparent volume ol distribution (V/F) of metlormin following single oral doses oi
`GLUCOPHAGE 850 mg averaged 6542358 L. Mettormin is negligibly bound to plasma proteins,
`in contrast to sulforvylureas, which are more than 90% protein bound. Metlormin partitions into
`erythrocytes, most likely as a function of time. At usual clinical doses and dosing schedules of
`GLUCOPHAGE, steady state plasma concentrations of metformin are reached within 24-48 hours
`and are generally < 1 pg/ml. During controlled clinical trials of GLUCOPHAGE, maximum met-
`lormin plasma levels did not exceed 5 pg/mL, even at maximum doses.
`Metabolism and Elimination
`Intravenous single-dose studies in normal subjects demonstrate that metlormin is excreted
`unchanged in the urine and does not undergo hepatic metabolism (no metabolites have been iden-
`tified in humans) nor biliary excretion. Renal clearance (see Table 1) is approximately 3.5 times
`greater than creatinine clearance, which indicates that tubular secretion is the major route of
`
`2.45 (10.70)
`
`2.71 (21.05)
`
`412 (:93)
`
`1.86 (:o.52)
`4.12 (:1 .33)
`3.93 ($0.92)
`
`3.20 (10.45)
`3.75 (:o.50)
`4.01 (:1 .10)
`
`334 (1122)
`me (:57)
`
`‘ All doses given lasting except the first 18 doses of the multiple dose studies
`Peak plasma concentration
`‘3 Time to peak plasma concentration
`d Combined results (average means) of five studies: mean age 32 years (range 23-59 years)
`’ Kinetic study done following dose 19, given fasting
`I Elderly subjects, mean age 71 years (range 65-81 years)
`9 CL,’ = creatinine clearance normalized to body surlace area of 1.73 m2
`Pediatrics
`No pharmacokinetic data from studies of pediatric patients are cunently available.
`Gender
`Mettonnin pharrnacokinetic parameters did not differ significantly between normal subjects and
`patients with type 2 diabetes when analyzed according to gender (males = 19, females = 16).
`Similarly, in controlled clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes, the antihyperglycemic effect
`of GLUCOPHAGE (metlormin hydrochloride tablets) was comparable in males and females.
`Race
`No studies of metfonnin phamiacokinetic parameters according to race have been performed. In
`controlled clinical studies of GLUCOPHAGE in patients with type 2 diabetes, the antihyperglycemic
`ellect was comparable in whites (n=249), blacks (n=51)_ and Hispanics (n=24).
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`GLUCOPHAGE
`In a double-blind, placebocontrolled, multicenter U.S. clinical trial involving obese patients with
`type 2 diabetes whose hyperyycemia was not adequately controlled with dietary management
`alone (baseline fasting plasma glucose [FPG] of approximately 240 mg/dL),
`treatment with
`GLUCOPHAGE (up to 2550 mg/day) for 29 weeks resulted in significant mean net reductions in
`fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and hemoglobin Aw (HbA,J of 59 mg/dL,
`83 mg/dL, and 1.8%, respectively, compared to the placebo group (see Table 2).
`Table 2. GLUCOPHAGE vs Placebo
`Summary of Mean Changes from Baseline‘ In Fasting Plasma Glucose,
`HbA and Body Weight, at Final Visit (29-week study)
`GLUCOPHAGE
`Placebo
`(ft = 145)
`(n = 141)
`
`p-Value
`
`FPG (mg/dL)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`Hemoglobin A,‘ (‘V-)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`Body Weight (lbs)
`Baseline
`
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`
`‘All patients on diet therapy at Baseline
`
`"Not statistically significant
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 2
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 2
`
`

`
`
`
`A 29-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study ol GLUCOPHAGE and glyburide, alone and in
`combination, was conducted in obese patients with type 2 diabetes who had tailed to achieve
`adequate glycemic control while on maximum doses 01 glyburide (baseline FPG of approximately
`250 mg/dL) (see Table 3). Patients randomized to continue on glyburide experienced worsening of
`gycemic control, with mean increases in FPG, PPG, and HbA,c 01 14 mg/dL. 3 mgldL and 0.2%,
`respectively. In contrast, those randomized to GLUCOPHAGE (up to 2500 mg/day) experienced a
`slight improvement, with mean reductions in FPG, FPG, and HbA,c or 1 rng1dL, s mg/dL and 0.4%,
`respectively. The combimtion ol GLUCOPHAGE and glyburida was effective in reducing FPG, PPG,
`and HbA,c levels by 63 mg/dL, 65 mg/dL and 1.7%, respectively. Compared to resuts ol glyburide
`treatment alone, the net diflerences with combination treatment were -77 mg/dL, -68 mg/dL and
`-1.9%, respectively (see Table 3).
`Table 3. Combined GLUCOPHAGE/Glyburlde (Comb) vs Glyburide (Gtyb) or
`GLUCOPHAGE (GLU) Monotherepy: Summary of Mean Changes from BassIne'
`in Fasting Plasma Glucose. HbA and Body Weight, at Final Visit (29-week study)
`p-values
`GLU vs
`Comb
`
`Comb
`(n = 213)
`
`Glyb
`(n = 209)
`
`GLU
`(n = 210)
`
`Glyb vs
`Comb
`
`GLU vs
`Glyb
`
`(HbA1 : 7.15 2 0.61 versus 6.97 2 0.62 for GLUCOPHAGE plus insulin and placebo plus insulin,
`respectively) with 19% less insulin versus baseline (reduction 01 23.66 x 30.22 versus an increase
`ol 0.43 : 25.2!) units for GLUCOPHAGE plus insulin and placebo plus insulin, p<0.01). In addition,
`this study demonstrated that the combination of GLUCOPHAGE (mettormin hydrochloride tablets)
`plus insulin resulted in reduction in body weight of 3.11 2 4.30 lbs, compared to an increase ot 1.30
`2 6.08 lbs for placebo plus insulin, p=0.01.
`GLUCOPHAGE XR
`A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study ol GLUCOPHAGE XR, taken once daily with the
`evening meal, was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes who had tailed to achieve glycemic
`control with diet and exercise (HbA1c 7.0-10.0%, FPG 126-270 mg/dL). Patients entering the study
`had a mean baseline HbA,c ol 8.0% and a mean baseline FPG oi 176 mg/dL. Alter 12 weeks treat-
`ment, mean HbA,¢ had increased from baseline by 0.1% and mean FPG decreased from baseline
`by 2 mg/dL in the placebo group. compared with a decrease in mean l>tbA,c ot 0.6% and a
`decrease in mean FPG ol 23 mg/dL in patients treated with GLUCOPHAGE XR 11200 mg once daily.
`Subsequently, the treatment dose was increased to 1500 mg once daily if HbA1c was 27.0% but
`(8.0% (patients with HbA,c 23.0% were discontinued lrom the study). At the final visit (24~week),
`mean I-lbA,c had increased 0.2% from baseline in placebo patients and decreased 0.6% with
`GLUCOPHAGE XFI (metlorrnin hydrochloride extended—release tablets).
`A 18-week. doubltbllnd, placebocontrolled, dose-response study of GLUCOPHAGE XR, taken
`once daily with the evening meal, or twice daily with meals, was conducted in patients with type 2
`diabetes who had lailed to achieve glycemic control with diet and exercise (HbA1c 7.0-11%, FPG
`126-280 mg/dL). Changes in glycemic control and body weight are shown in Table 8.
`
`Table 8. Summary of Mean Changes from Baseline’ in HbA,=,
`Fasting Plasma Glucose, and Body Weight at Final Visit (16-week study)
`GLUCOPHAGE XR
`1000 mg
`1500 mg
`2000 mg
`Once
`Once
`Once
`Dally
`Daily
`Daily
`
`1000 mg
`Twice
`Dally
`
`p-value‘
`
`Hemoglobin A1: (98)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`p-value‘
`FPG (mg/dL)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`p-value“
`Body Weight (lbs)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`
`.
`
`All patients on diet therapy at Baseline
`" All comparisons versus Placebo
`" Not statistically significant
`
`in gycemic control was seen at all dose levels 01
`improvement
`Compared with placebo,
`GLUCOPHAGE XR and treatment was not associated with any significant change in weight
`(see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION tor dosing recommendations for GLUCOPHAGE and
`GLUCOPHAGE )(R).
`A 24-week, double-blind, randomized study of GLUCOPHAGE XFl, taken once daily with the
`evening meal, and GLUCOPHAGE, taken twice daily (with breakfast and evening meal), was con-
`ducted in patients with type 2 diabetes who had been treated with GLUCOPHAGE 500 mg twice
`daily for at least 8 weeks prior to study entry. The GLUCOPHAGE dose had not necessarily been
`titrated to achieve a specific level ol glycemic control prior to study entry. Patients qualified tor the
`study it HbA,c was 58.5% and FPG was Qt!) mg/dL Changes in glycemic control and body
`weight are shown in Table 7.
`
`Table 7. Summary of Mean Changes from Baseline‘ in HbA1c,
`Fasting Plasma Glucose, and Body Weight at Week 12 and at Final Visit
`?SE. 3
`GLUCOPHAGE
`500 mg ‘twice Dally
`T :4
`
`(n=74) (-0.2. 2.4)
`
`(96)
`
`Hemoglobin <
`Baseline
`Change at 12 Weeks
`(95% Cl)
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`(95% Cl)
`FPG (mgldl)
`Baseline
`Che e at 12 Weeks
`5% cl)
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`(95% Cl)
`300! Weitlhl 0!”)
`Baseline
`Change at 12 Weeks
`(95% Cl)
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`(95% Cl)
`
`(-0.03, 0.31)
`0.14-
`(004, 0.31)
`
`127.2
`12.9
`6.5, 19.4)
`
`(7.0, 21.0)
`(n=7t)
`
`GLUCOPHAGE X8
`1000 mg Once Dally 1500 mg Once Daily
`ln=72l
`("=53
`6.99
`7.02
`0.04
`(-0.03, 0.15)
`0.13
`(-0.02, 0.28)
`l'|=7°l
`131.4
`3.7
`(-0.4, 7.0)
`7.6
`(1.0, 14.2)
`01:71)
`192.7
`0.7
`(-0.4, 1.8)
`0.9
`(-0.4. 2.0
`
`(0.10, 0.36)
`0.27
`- .1 1 , 0.43)
`n=72)
`.-.
`
`(4.4, 14.6)
`
`(4.4, 18.5)
`
`.41
`
`.11
`
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`at FINAL VISI'T
`
`Fasting Plasma
`Glucose (mg/dL)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`Hemoglobin A1‘ (93)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`Body Weight (lbs)
`Baseline
`
`"Not statistically significant
`‘AI patients on glyburide, 20 mglday, at Baseline
`The magnitude 01 the decline in lasting blood glucose concentration lollowing the institution
`of GLUCOPHAGE (metlormin hydrochloride tablets) therapy was proportional to the level oi
`fasting hypergycemia. Patients with type 2 diabetes with higher tasting gucoee concentrations
`experienced greater declines in plasma glucose and glycoeylated hemoglobin.
`In clinical studies, GLUCOPHAGE, alone or in combination with a sulonylurea, lowered mean fast-
`ing serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol levels and had no adverse ellects on
`other lipid levels (see Table 4).
`Table 4. Summary o1 Mean Percent Change from Baseline
`of Malor Serum Lipid Variables at Final Visit (29-week studies)
`Combined GLUCOPHAGE/Glyburide
`vs Monotherapy
`GLUCOPHAGE
`Glyburlde
`(n = 213)
`
`GLUCOPHAGE Placebo
`(n = 141)
`(rs = 145)
`Total Cholesterol (mg/dl.)
`Baseline
`Mean 96 change
`at FINAL VISIT
`
`LUCOPHAGE
`(n = 210)
`
`GLUCOPHAGE vs Placebo
`
`Baseline
`Mean % change
`at FINAL VlSl'I'
`
`Baseline
`Mean % change
`at FINAL VISIT
`
`Baseline
`Mean % change
`
`In contrast to sultonylureas, body weigll of individuals on GLUCOPHAGE tended to remain stable
`or even decrease somewhat (see Tables 2 and 3).
`A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of GLUCOPHAGE pllu insulin versus insulin
`plus placebo was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes who failed to achieve adequate
`glycemic control on insulin alone (see Table 5). Patients randomized to receive GLUCOPHAGE plus
`insulin achieved a reduction in HbA,c ol 2.10%, compared to a 1.56% reduction in HbA,c achieved
`by insulin plus placebo. The improvement in glycemic control was achieved at the line! study visit
`with 16% less insulin, 93.0 U/day vs 110.8 U/day, GLUCOPHAGE plus insulin versus insulin plus
`placebo, respectively. p=0.04.
`Table 5. Combined GLUCOPHAGE/Insulin vs Placebollnsulln
`Summary of Mean Changes lrorn Baseline in HbA and Daily Insulin Dose
`Mean 2 SE""'"°"°'
`
`n=23
`
`n=28
`
`Hemoglobin A“ (94)
`
`
`
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`Insulin Dose (U/day)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL vlsrr
`
`- 2.10
`
`94.64
`15.93
`
`. 10.00 2 7.775
`
`5 Statistically significant using analysis at covariance with baseline as covariate (p=0.04)
`Not significant using analysis at variance (values shown in table)
`b Statistically significant for insulin (p=0.04)
`A second doubIe~blind, placebo-controlled study (n=51), with 16 weeks of randomized treatment,
`demonstrated that in patients with type 2 diabetes controlled on insulin for 8 weeks with an aver-
`age HbA,c of 7.46 2 0.97%, the addition of GLUCOPHAGE maintained similar glycemic control
`
`' All patients on GLUCOPHAGE 500 mg twice daily at Baseline
`3 n=68
`in the
`there was an increase in mean HbA,c in all groups;
`treatment,
`After 12 weeks of
`GLUCOPHAGE XR 1000 mg group, the increase lrom baseline 010.23% was statistically signifi-
`cant (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRAHON).
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 3
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 3
`
`

`
`
`
`Changes in lipid parameters in the previously described placebo-controlled dose-response study
`of GLUCOPHAGE XR are shown in Table 8.
`
`GLUCOPHAGE and GLUCOPHAGE XR should be temporarily discontinued in patients undergoing
`radiologic studies involving intravasculer administration of iodinated contrast materials. because
`use of such products may result in acute alteration of renal function. (See also PRECAUTIONS.)
`WARNINGS
`Lactic Acidosis:
`Lactic acidosis is a rare, but serious, metabolic complication that can occur due to met-
`forrnin accumulation during treatment with GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR; when It
`occurs, It is fatal in approximately 50% of cases. Lactic acidosis may also occur in asso-
`ciation with a number at pathoplrysiologic conditions, including diabetes mellltue, and
`whenever there is significant tissue hypoperfusion and hypcxemia. Lactic acidosis ls char-
`acterized by elevated blood lactate levels (>5 mmoIlL), decreased blood pH, electrolyte
`dsturbances with an increased anion gap, and an Increased lactate/pyruvate ratio. When
`metformin is implicated as the cause of lactic acidosis, metformln plasma levels >5 pg/ml.
`are generally found.
`The reported incidence of lactic acidosis in patients receiving metforrnln hydrochloride is
`very low (approximately 0.03 casesltooo patient-years, with approximately 0.015 fatal
`cseesltooo patient-years). Reported cases have occurred primarily in diabetic patients
`with significant renal Insufficiency, incluclng both intrinsic renal disease and renal hypo-
`perfuslon, often in the setting of multiple concomitant medical/surgical problems and muf-
`tipls concomitant rnedlcatlons. Patients with congestive heart failure requiring pharmaco-
`Iogic management, In particular those with unstable or acute congestive heart failure who
`are at risk of hypoperfuslon and hypoxemla, are at increased risk of lactic acidosis. The
`risk of lactic acidosis increases with the degree of renal dysfunction and the patiant's age.
`The risk of lactic acidosis may, therefore, be signillcarrtfy decreased by regular monitoring
`of renal function In patients taking GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPI-IAGE XR and by use of the
`minimum effective dose of CLUCOPI-IAGE or GLUCOPNAGE XR. In particular, treatment of
`the elderly should be accompanied by carahl monitoring of renal function. GLUCOPI-IAGE
`or GLUCOPHAGE )6! treatment should not be inltldted in patients 2 80 years of age unless
`measurement of creatinine clearance demonstrates that renal function is not reduced.
`as these patients are more susceptible to developing lactic acidosis.
`In addition,
`GLUCOPHAGE and GLUCOPHAGE XR should be promptly withheld In the presence of any
`condition associated with hypoxemla, dehydration, or sepsis. Because Impaired hepatic
`function may significantly limit
`the ability to clear lactate, GLUCOPHAGE and
`GLUCOPHAGE XR should generally be avoided In patients with clinical or laboratory
`evidence of hepatic disease. Patients should be cautioned against excessive alcohol
`htalte, either acute or chronic, when taking GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR, since
`alcohol potentlatee the effects of metformln hydrochloride on lachta metabolism. In addi-
`tlon, GLUCOPIIAGE and GLUCOPHAGE XII should be temporarily discontinued prior
`to any lntravascutar rediocontrast study and for any surgical procedure (see also
`PRECAUTIONS).
`The onset of lactic acidosis often is subtle, and accompanied only by nonspecific
`symptoms such as malaise, rnyalgles. respiratory distress, Increasing sornnolence, and
`nonspecific abdominal distress. There may be associated hypothennh, hypoteneion, and
`resistant bradyarrhythmias with more marked acidosis. The patient and the petlant'a
`physician must be aware of the possible Importance of such symptoms and the patient
`should be instructed to notify the physician immediately If they occur [see also PRECAU-
`TIONS). GLUCOPHAGE and GLUCOPHAGE XI-‘l sholld be withdrawn until the situation is
`clarified. Serum electrolytes, Itetones, blood glucose and. If indicated, blood pH, lactate
`levels, and even blood metformin levels may be useful. Once a patient is stabilized on any
`dose level of GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR, gastrointestinal symptoms. which are
`common during Initiation of therapy, are unlikely to be dmg related. Later occurrence of
`gastrointestinal symptoms could be due to lactic acidosis or other serious disease.
`Levels of fasting venous plasma lactate above the upper limit of normal but less than
`5 rnmol/L in patients felting GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR do not necessarily indi-
`cate impending lactic acidosis and may be explainable by other mechanisms, such as
`poorly controlled diabetes or obesity. vigorous physical activity, or technical problems in
`sample handling. (See also PRECAUTIONS.)
`Lactic acidosis should be suspected in any diabetic patient with metabolic acidosis lack-
`lng evidence of ltetoacidosle (ketonuria and itetonemia).
`Lactic acidosis is a medical emergency that must be treated in a hospital setting. In a
`patient with lactic acidosis who is taking GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR. the drug
`should be discontinued immediately and general supportive measures promptly instituted.
`Because metfonnln hydrochloride is dlalyzable (with a clearance of up to 170 mUmin under
`good hemodynamic conditions), prompt hemodlalysls is recommended to oorred the sol-
`doaia and remove the accumulated metformin. Such management Mtaen results in prompt
`reversal of symptoms and recovery. (See also CONTRAINDICATIONS and PRECAUTIONS.)
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`General
`Monitoring of renal function — Metforrnin is known to be substantially excreted by the kidney,
`and the risk of metformin accunulation and lactic acidosis increases with the degee of impairment
`of renal function. Thus, patients with serun creatinine levels above the upper limit of normal for
`their age should not receive GLUCOPHAGE (metforrnin hydrochloride tablets) or GLUCOPHAGE
`XR (metformln hydrochloride extended-release tablets).
`In patients with advanced age,
`GLUCOPHAGE and GLUCOPHAGE XR should be carefully titrated to establish the minlrnum dose
`for adequate gfycomic effect, because aging is associated with reduced renal function. In elderly
`patients, particularly those 280 years of age, renal function should be monitored regularly and, gen-
`erally, GLUCOPHAGE and GLUCOPHAGE )0? should not be titrated to the maximum dose (see
`WARNINGS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`Before initiation of GLUCOPI-IAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XH therapy and at least annually thereafter,
`renal function should be assessed and verified as normal. In patients in whom development of renal
`dysfunction is anticipated, renal function should be assessed more frequently and GLUCOPHAGE
`or GLUCOPHAGE XR discontinued if evidence of renal irnpainnent is present.
`Use of concomitant rnadiudons that may affect renal hrncfion or metfonnln disposition —
`Concomitant medication(s) that may affect renal function or resut in sigiilicant hemodynernic change
`or may interfere with the disposition of metformin, such as cationic drugs that are eliminated by renal
`ttbdar secretion (see PRECAUTIONS: Drug Interactions], should be used with caution.
`Radiologic studies involving die use of lntravascular iodlnafad contrast materials (for exam-
`ple, intravenous urograrn, htravenous cholangiography, angiography, and computed tomog-
`raphy (CT) scans wfbtr intrevascular contrast materials) — lntravascular contrast studies with
`iodinated materials can lead to acute alteration of renal function and have been associated with
`lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin (see CONTRAINDICATIONS). Therefore, in patients
`in whom any such study is planned, GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XFI should be temporarily
`discontinued at the time of or prior to the procedure, and withheld for 48 hours subsequent to the
`procedure and reinstituted only after renal function has been re-evaluated and found to be normal.
`Hypoxia: states — Cardiovascular collapse (shock) from whatever cause, acute congestive heart fail-
`ure, acute myocardial infarction and other conditions characterized by hypoxernia have been associ-
`ated with lactic acidosis and may also cause prerenal azotemia. When such events occur in patients
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 4
`
`Table 8. Summary of Mean Percent Changes from Baseline‘ in
`Malor Lipid Variables at Final Visit (16-week study)
`GLUCOPHAGE XR
`500mg 1000mg 1500mg 2000mg 1000mg
`Once
`Once
`Once
`Once
`Tirrlce
`Daily
`Daily
`Daily
`Daily
`Daily
`llt=120)
`(n=‘l13)
`(n=110)
`(n=l26)
`214.6
`204.4
`0.7%
`-1.6%
`
`Placebo
`
`-3.3%
`FINAL VISIT
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`
`Total Cholesterol (mgldl)
`Baseline
`Mean '36 change at
`FINAL VISIT
`Tohl Triglycerides (mgIdL) (n=12D)
`Baseline
`Mean 96 change at
`FINAL VISIT
`LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL)
`Baseline
`Mean % change at
`FINAL VISIT
`HDL—Cholaaterol(mgldI.)
`Baseline
`Mean % change at
`FINAL VISIT
`
`(n=119)
`
`(n=120)
`
`ln=126I
`194.2
`14.9%
`
`(rt=‘l2Q
`125.8
`
`(n=l13)
`
`(n=110)
`
`(rr=113)
`
`(n=108)
`
`‘ All patients on diet therapy at Baseline
`Changes in lipid parameters in the previously described study of GLUCOPHAGE and
`GLUCOPHAGE XFI are shown in Table 9.
`
`Table 0. Summary of Mean Percent Changes from Baseline‘ in
`Major Lipid Variables at Final Visit (24-week study)
`GLUCOPHAGE XR
`SCI) mg Once Dally
`
`Total Cholesterol (mg/dl.)
`Baseline
`Mean % change at
`FINAL VISIT
`Total Triglycerides (mg/dL)
`Baseline
`Mean 96 change at
`FINAL VISIT
`LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dl.)
`Baseline
`Mean 96 change at
`FINAL VISIT
`HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL)
`Baseline
`Mean 96 change at
`
`' All patients on GLUCOPHAGE 500 mg twice daily at Baseline
`Pediatric Clinical Studies
`In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in pediatric patients aged 10 to 16 years with type 2
`diabetes (mean FPG 182.2 mgIdl.), treatment with GLUCOPHAGE (up to 2000 mg/day) for up to
`16 weeks (mean duration of treatment 11 weeks) resulted in e significant mean net reduction in FPG
`of 64.3 mg/dL compared w'rth placebo (see Table ll).
`
`Table 10. GLUCOPHAGE vs Placebo Pediatrics’)
`Summary of Mean Changes from Baseline’ in
`Plasma Glucose and Body Weight at Flrul Visit
`
`FPG (mg/dL)
`Baseline
`
`°-L°°°'"*°E
`ln=37l
`162.4
`-42.9
`
`Body Weight (lbs)
`Baseline
`Change at FINAL VISIT
`
`v
`
`(M35)
`192.3
`21.4
`ln=38)
`189.0
`-2.0
`
`" Pediatric patients mean age 13.8 years (range 10-16 years)
`' All patients on diet therapy at Baseline
`" Not statistically significant
`INDICATIONS AND USE
`GLUCOPHAGE (matlormin hydrochloride tablets) and GLUCOPHAGE XR (metformln hydrochloride
`extended~rslease tablets). as monotherapy, are indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to
`improve gycernic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. GLUCOPHAGE is indicated in patients
`10 years of age and older, and GLUCOPHAGE XR is indicated in patients 17 years of age and older.
`GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR may be used concomitantly with a sullonylurea or insulin to
`improve glycemic control in adults (17 years of age and older).
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`GLUCOPHAGE and GLUCOPHAGE XR are contraindicated in patients with:
`1. Renal disease or renal dysfunction (e.g., as suggested by serum creatinine levels 2 1.5 mg/dL
`[males], 2 1.4 mg/dL [females] or abnormal creatinine clearance) which may also result from
`conditions such as cardiovascular collapse (shock), acute myocardial infarction, and sep-
`ticemia (see WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS).
`2. Congestive heart failure requiring phannacologic treatment.
`3. Known hypersensitivity to metlormin hydrochloride.
`4. Acute or chronic metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis. with or without come.
`Diabetic ketoacidosis should be treated with insufin.
`
`Mylan EX 1008, Page 4
`
`

`
`
`
`on GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR therapy. the dmg should be promptly discontinued.
`Surgical procedures — GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR therapy shotld be temporarily sus-
`pended for any surgical procedure (except minor procedures not associated with restricted intake
`of food and fluids) and should not be restarted until the patient‘s oral intake has resuned and renal
`function has been evaluated as normal.
`Alcohol intake — Alcohol is known to potentiate the affect of metformin on lactate metabolism.
`Patients, therefore, should be warned against excessive alcohol intake, acute or chronic, while
`receiving GLUCOPHAGE or GLUCOPHAGE XR.
`hnpaired hepatic function - Since impaired hepatic function has been associated with some
`cases of lactic acidosis, GLUCOPHAGE and GLUCOPHAGE XR should generally be avoided in
`patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic disease.
`Vitamin 5,, levels —— In controlled clinical
`trials of GLUCOPHAGE of 29 weeks duration. a
`decrease to subnonnal levels of previously normal serum \/Itamin 3,2 levels, without clinical man-
`ifestations. was obse

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket