`571-272-7822
`
` Paper No. 16
`Entered: December 8, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01563 (Patent 8,673,927 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01564 (Patent 8,846,695 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01565 (Patent 8,853,156 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01566 (Patent 9,173,859 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER, BRIAN P.MURPHY, and
`ZHENYU YANG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Charles A. Naggar
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are common to each referenced case.
`We, therefore, issue a single order that has been entered in each case.
`For convenience, paper numbers refer to those filed in IPR2016-01563.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01563 (Patent 8,673,927 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01564 (Patent 8,846,695 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01565 (Patent 8,853,156 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01566 (Patent 9,173,859 B2)
`
`
`Petitioner filed a Motion for Charles A. Naggar to appear pro hac vice
`
`in each of these proceedings. Paper 13. The Motion is supported by the
`
`Declaration of Charles A. Naggar. Ex. 1018. Patent Owner did not file any
`
`opposition.
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`
`admit Mr. Charles A. Naggar pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Charles A. Naggar to appear
`
`pro hac vice in this proceeding is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Charles A. Naggar is authorized to
`
`represent Petitioner as back-up counsel only, and that Petitioner is to
`
`continue to have a registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Charles A. Naggar shall comply with
`
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Charles A. Naggar shall be subject to
`
`the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the
`
`Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–
`
`11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01563 (Patent 8,673,927 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01564 (Patent 8,846,695 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01565 (Patent 8,853,156 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01566 (Patent 9,173,859 B2)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Thomas Parker
`Thomas.parker@alston.com
`
`Chris McArdle
`Chris.mcardle@alston.com
`
`Ellen Cheong
`Ellen.cheong@alston.com
`
`Charles Naggar
`Charles.naggar@alston.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Leora Ben-Ami
`Leora.benami@kirkland.com
`
`Eugene Goryunov
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`
`Mira Mulvaney
`Mira.mulvaney@kirkland.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`