throbber
Feature Article/Aronoff et al.
`
`Glucose Metabolism and Regulation:
`Beyond Insulin and Glucagon
`
`Stephen L. Aronoff, MD, FACP, FACE; Kathy Berkowitz, APRN, BC, FNP, CDE; Barb Shreiner, RN,
`MN, CDE, BC-ADM; and Laura Want, RN, MS, CDE, CCRC, BC-ADM
`
`Abstract
`
`Insulin and glucagon are potent regu-
`lators of glucose metabolism. For
`decades, we have viewed diabetes
`from a bi-hormonal perspective of
`glucose regulation. This perspective is
`incomplete and inadequate in explain-
`ing some of the difficulties that
`patients and practitioners face when
`attempting to tightly control blood
`glucose concentrations. Intensively
`managing diabetes with insulin is
`
`fraught with frustration and risk.
`Despite our best efforts, glucose fluc-
`tuations are unpredictable, and hypo-
`glycemia and weight gain are com-
`mon. These challenges may be a result
`of deficiencies or abnormalities in
`other glucoregulatory hormones. New
`understanding of the roles of other
`pancreatic and incretin hormones has
`led to a multi-hormonal view of glu-
`cose homeostasis.
`
`HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
`Our understanding of diabetes as a
`metabolic disease has evolved signifi-
`cantly since the discovery of insulin in
`the 1920s. Insulin was identified as a
`potent hormonal regulator of both
`glucose appearance and disappear-
`ance in the circulation. Subsequently,
`diabetes was viewed as a mono-hor-
`monal disorder characterized by
`absolute or relative insulin deficiency.
`Since its discovery, insulin has been
`the only available pharmacological
`treatment for patients with type 1
`diabetes and a mainstay of therapy
`for patients with insulin-deficient
`type 2 diabetes.1–7
`The recent discovery of additional
`hormones with glucoregulatory
`actions has expanded our understand-
`ing of how a variety of different hor-
`mones contribute to glucose home-
`ostasis. In the 1950s, glucagon was
`characterized as a major stimulus of
`hepatic glucose production. This dis-
`covery led to a better understanding
`of the interplay between insulin and
`glucagon, thus leading to a bi-hor-
`monal definition of diabetes.
`Subsequently, the discovery of a sec-
`ond ␤-cell hormone, amylin, was first
`reported in 1987. Amylin was deter-
`mined to have a role that comple-
`mented that of insulin, and, like
`
`Diabetes Spectrum Volume 17, Number 3, 2004
`
`insulin, was found to be deficient in
`people with diabetes. This more
`recent development led to a view of
`glucose homeostasis involving multi-
`ple pancreatic hormones.8
`In the mid 1970s, several gut hor-
`mones were identified. One of these,
`an incretin hormone, glucagon-like
`peptide-1 (GLP-1), was recognized as
`another important contributor to the
`maintenance of glucose homeosta-
`sis.9,10 Based on current understand-
`ing, glucose homeostasis is governed
`by the interplay of insulin, glucagon,
`amylin, and incretin hormones.
`This enhanced understanding of
`glucose homeostasis will be central to
`the design of new pharmacological
`agents to promote better clinical out-
`comes and quality of life for people
`with diabetes. This review will focus
`on the more recently discovered hor-
`mones involved in glucose homeostasis
`and is not intended to be a compre-
`hensive review of diabetes therapies.
`
`NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY
`Plasma glucose concentration is a
`function of the rate of glucose enter-
`ing the circulation (glucose appear-
`ance) balanced by the rate of glucose
`removal from the circulation (glu-
`cose disappearance). Circulating glu-
`cose is derived from three sources:
`
`183
`
`Address correspondence and requests
`for reprints to: Barb Schreiner, RN,
`MN, CDE, BC-ADM, Amylin
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9360 Towne
`Centre Drive, San Diego, CA 92121.
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2006
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01563
`Page 1
`
`

`
`Feature Article/Beyond Insulin and Glucagon
`
`intestinal absorption during the fed
`state, glycogenolysis, and gluconeo-
`genesis. The major determinant of
`how quickly glucose appears in the
`circulation during the fed state is the
`rate of gastric emptying. Other
`sources of circulating glucose are
`derived chiefly from hepatic process-
`es: glycogenolysis, the breakdown of
`glycogen, the polymerized storage
`form of glucose; and gluconeogene-
`sis, the formation of glucose primari-
`ly from lactate and amino acids dur-
`ing the fasting state.
`Glycogenolysis and gluconeogene-
`sis are partly under the control of
`glucagon, a hormone produced in the
`␣-cells of the pancreas. During the
`first 8–12 hours of fasting,
`glycogenolysis is the primary mecha-
`nism by which glucose is made avail-
`able (Figure 1A). Glucagon facilitates
`this process and thus promotes glu-
`cose appearance in the circulation.
`Over longer periods of fasting, glu-
`cose, produced by gluconeogenesis, is
`released from the liver.
`Glucoregulatory hormones include
`insulin, glucagon, amylin, GLP-1, glu-
`cose-dependent insulinotropic peptide
`(GIP), epinephrine, cortisol, and
`growth hormone. Of these, insulin
`and amylin are derived from the ␤-
`cells, glucagon from the ␣-cells of the
`pancreas, and GLP-1 and GIP from
`the L-cells of the intestine.
`The glucoregulatory hormones of
`the body are designed to maintain
`circulating glucose concentrations in
`a relatively narrow range. In the fast-
`ing state, glucose leaves the circula-
`tion at a constant rate. To keep pace
`with glucose disappearance, endoge-
`nous glucose production is necessary.
`For all practical purposes, the sole
`source of endogenous glucose pro-
`duction is the liver. Renal gluconeo-
`genesis contributes substantially to
`the systemic glucose pool only during
`periods of extreme starvation.
`Although most tissues have the abili-
`ty to hydrolyze glycogen, only the
`liver and kidneys contain glucose-6-
`phosphatase, the enzyme necessary
`for the release of glucose into the cir-
`culation. In the bi-hormonal model
`of glucose homeostasis, insulin is the
`key regulatory hormone of glucose
`disappearance, and glucagon is a
`major regulator of glucose appear-
`ance. After reaching a post-meal
`peak, blood glucose slowly decreases
`
`Figure 1. Glucose homeostasis: roles of insulin and glucagon. 1A. For nondia-
`betic individuals in the fasting state, plasma glucose is derived from
`glycogenolysis under the direction of glucagon (1). Basal levels of insulin con-
`trol glucose disposal (2). Insulin’s role in suppressing gluconeogenesis and
`glycogenolysis is minimal due to low insulin secretion in the fasting state (3).
`1B. For nondiabetic individuals in the fed state, plasma glucose is derived
`from ingestion of nutrients (1). In the bi-hormonal model, glucagon secretion
`is suppressed through the action of endogenous insulin secretion (2). This
`action is facilitated through the paracrine route (communication within the
`islet cells) (3). Additionally, in the fed state, insulin suppresses gluconeogenesis
`and glycogenolysis in the liver (4) and promotes glucose disposal in the
`periphery (5). 1C. For individuals with diabetes in the fasting state, plasma
`glucose is derived from glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis (1) under the
`direction of glucagon (2). Exogenous insulin (3) influences the rate of periph-
`eral glucose disappearance (4) and, because of its deficiency in the portal cir-
`culation, does not properly regulate the degree to which hepatic gluconeogene-
`sis and glycogenolysis occur (5). 1D. For individuals with diabetes in the fed
`state, exogenous insulin (1) is ineffective in suppressing glucagon secretion
`through the physiological paracrine route (2), resulting in elevated hepatic glu-
`cose production (3). As a result, the appearance of glucose in the circulation
`exceeds the rate of glucose disappearance (4). The net effect is postprandial
`hyperglycemia (5).
`during the next several hours, even-
`tually returning to fasting levels. In
`the immediate post-feeding state, glu-
`cose removal into skeletal muscle and
`adipose tissue is driven mainly by
`insulin. At the same time, endoge-
`nous glucose production is sup-
`pressed by 1) the direct action of
`insulin, delivered via the portal vein,
`on the liver, and 2) the paracrine
`effect or direct communication with-
`in the pancreas between the ␣- and
`␤-cells, which results in glucagon
`suppression (Figure 1B).11–14
`
`␤-CELL HORMONES
`Insulin
`Until recently, insulin was the only
`pancreatic ␤-cell hormone known to
`lower blood glucose concentrations.
`Insulin, a small protein composed of
`two polypeptide chains containing 51
`amino acids, is a key anabolic hor-
`mone that is secreted in response to
`increased blood glucose and amino
`acids following ingestion of a meal.
`Like many hormones, insulin exerts
`its actions through binding to specific
`receptors present on many cells of the
`
`184
`
`Diabetes Spectrum Volume 17, Number 3, 2004
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2006
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01563
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Feature Article/Aronoff et al.
`
`Table 1. Effects of Primary Glucoregulatory Hormones
`
`PANCREAS
`␣-cells
`Glucagon
`
`␤-cells
`Insulin
`
`• Stimulates the breakdown of stored liver glycogen
`• Promotes hepatic gluconeogenesis
`• Promotes hepatic ketogenesis
`
`• Affects glucose metabolism and storage of ingested nutrients
`• Promotes glucose uptake by cells
`• Suppresses postprandial glucagon secretion
`• Promotes protein and fat synthesis
`• Promotes use of glucose as an energy source
`
`Amylin
`
`• Suppresses postprandial glucagon secretion
`• Slows gastric emptying
`• Reduces food intake and body weight
`
`INTESTINE
`L-cells
`GLP-1
`
`• Enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion
`• Suppresses postprandial glucagon secretion
`• Slows gastric emptying
`• Reduces food intake and body weight
`• Promotes ␤-cell health
`
`if glucose concentrations remain
`high.13,14
`While glucose is the most potent
`stimulus of insulin, other factors stim-
`ulate insulin secretion. These addition-
`al stimuli include increased plasma
`concentrations of some amino acids,
`especially arginine, leucine, and lysine;
`GLP-1 and GIP released from the gut
`following a meal; and parasympathet-
`ic stimulation via the vagus nerve.16,17
`
`Amylin
`Isolated from pancreatic amyloid
`deposits in the islets of Langerhans,
`amylin was first reported in the litera-
`ture in 1987. Amylin, a 37–amino
`acid peptide, is a neuroendocrine hor-
`mone coexpressed and cosecreted
`with insulin by pancreatic ␤-cells in
`response to nutrient stimuli.8,10,18,19
`When secreted by the pancreas, the
`insulin-to-amylin molar ratio in the
`portal circulation is approximately
`50:1. Because of hepatic extraction of
`insulin, this ratio falls to ~ 20:1 in the
`peripheral circulation.20,21
`Studies in humans have demon-
`strated that the secretory and plasma
`concentration profiles of insulin and
`amylin are similar with low fasting
`concentrations and increases in
`response to nutrient intake.22,23 In
`healthy adults, fasting plasma amylin
`concentrations range from 4 to
`8 pmol/l rising as high as 25 pmol/l
`postprandially. In subjects with dia-
`betes, amylin is deficient in type 1 and
`impaired in type 2 diabetes.24,25
`Preclinical findings indicate that
`amylin works with insulin to help
`coordinate the rate of glucose appear-
`ance and disappearance in the circula-
`tion, thereby preventing an abnormal
`rise in glucose concentrations
`(Figure 2).26
`Amylin complements the effects of
`insulin on circulating glucose concen-
`
`body, including fat, liver, and muscle
`cells. The primary action of insulin is
`to stimulate glucose disappearance.
`Insulin helps control postprandial
`glucose in three ways. Initially,
`insulin signals the cells of insulin-sen-
`sitive peripheral tissues, primarily
`skeletal muscle, to increase their
`uptake of glucose.15 Secondly, insulin
`acts on the liver to promote glycogen-
`esis. Finally, insulin simultaneously
`inhibits glucagon secretion from pan-
`creatic ␣-cells, thus signalling the
`liver to stop producing glucose via
`glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis
`(Table 1).
`All of these actions reduce blood
`glucose.13 Other actions of insulin
`include the stimulation of fat synthe-
`sis, promotion of triglyceride storage
`in fat cells, promotion of protein syn-
`thesis in the liver and muscle, and
`proliferation of cell growth.13
`Insulin action is carefully regulat-
`ed in response to circulating glucose
`concentrations. Insulin is not secret-
`ed if the blood glucose concentration
`is ≤ 3.3 mmol/l, but is secreted in
`increasing amounts as glucose con-
`centrations increase beyond this
`threshold.14 Postprandially, the
`secretion of insulin occurs in two
`phases: an initial rapid release of
`preformed insulin, followed by
`increased insulin synthesis and
`release in response to blood glucose.
`Long-term release of insulin occurs
`
`Figure 2. Postprandial glucose flux in nondiabetic controls. Postprandial glu-
`cose flux is a balance between glucose appearance in the circulation and glu-
`cose disappearance or uptake. Glucose appearance is a function of hepatic
`(endogenous) glucose production and meal-derived sources and is regulated by
`pancreatic and gut hormones. Glucose disappearance is insulin mediated.
`Calculated from data in the study by Pehling et al.26
`
`Diabetes Spectrum Volume 17, Number 3, 2004
`
`185
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2006
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01563
`Page 3
`
`

`
`Feature Article/Beyond Insulin and Glucagon
`
`maintains basal blood glucose concen-
`trations within a normal range during
`the fasting state. When plasma glu-
`cose falls below the normal range,
`glucagon secretion increases, resulting
`in hepatic glucose production and
`return of plasma glucose to the nor-
`mal range.39,40 This endogenous
`source of glucose is not needed during
`and immediately following a meal,
`and glucagon secretion is suppressed.
`When coupled with insulin’s direct
`effect on the liver, glucagon suppres-
`sion results in a near-total suppression
`of hepatic glucose output (Figure 4).
`In the diabetic state, there is inade-
`quate suppression of postprandial
`glucagon secretion (hyperglucagone-
`mia)41,42 resulting in elevated hepatic
`glucose production (Figure 4).
`Importantly, exogenously adminis-
`tered insulin is unable both to restore
`normal postprandial insulin concen-
`trations in the portal vein and to sup-
`press glucagon secretion through a
`paracrine effect. This results in an
`abnormally high glucagon-to-insulin
`ratio that favors the release of hepatic
`glucose.43 These limits of exogenously
`administered insulin therapy are well
`documented in individuals with type 1
`or type 2 diabetes and are considered
`to be important contributors to the
`postprandial hyperglycemic state
`characteristic of diabetes.
`
`INCRETIN HORMONES GLP-1
`AND GIP
`The intricacies of glucose homeostasis
`become clearer when considering the
`role of gut peptides. By the late 1960s,
`Perley and Kipnis44 and others demon-
`strated that ingested food caused a
`more potent release of insulin than
`glucose infused intravenously. This
`effect, termed the “incretin effect,”
`suggested that signals from the gut are
`important in the hormonal regulation
`of glucose disappearance.
`Additionally, these hormonal signals
`from the proximal gut seemed to help
`regulate gastric emptying and gut
`motility.
`Several incretin hormones have
`been characterized, and the dominant
`ones for glucose homeostasis are GIP
`and GLP-1. GIP stimulates insulin
`secretion and regulates fat metabo-
`lism, but does not inhibit glucagon
`secretion or gastric emptying.45 GIP
`levels are normal or slightly elevated
`in people with type 2 diabetes.46
`
`Figure 3. Glucose homeostasis: roles of insulin, glucagon, amylin, and GLP-1.
`The multi-hormonal model of glucose homeostasis (nondiabetic individuals):
`in the fed state, amylin communicates through neural pathways (1) to suppress
`postprandial glucagon secretion (2) while helping to slow the rate of gastric
`emptying (3). These actions regulate the rate of glucose appearance in the cir-
`culation (4). *In animal models, amylin has been shown to dose-dependently
`reduced food intake and body weight (5). In addition, incretin hormones, such
`as GLP-1, glucose-dependently enhance insulin secretion (6) and suppress
`glucagon secretion (2) and, via neural pathways, help slow gastric emptying
`and reduce food intake and body weight (5).
`trations via two main mechanisms
`plasma glucose concentrations as well
`(Figure 3). Amylin suppresses post-
`as circulating peptides, including
`prandial glucagon secretion,27 thereby
`amylin.33–36
`decreasing glucagon-stimulated hepatic
`In summary, amylin works to regu-
`glucose output following nutrient
`late the rate of glucose appearance
`ingestion. This suppression of post-
`from both endogenous (liver-derived)
`prandial glucagon secretion is postulat-
`and exogenous (meal-derived)
`ed to be centrally mediated via efferent
`sources, and insulin regulates the rate
`vagal signals. Importantly, amylin does
`of glucose disappearance.37
`not suppress glucagon secretion during
`α-CELL HORMONE: GLUCAGON
`insulin-induced hypoglycemia.21,28
`Glucagon is a key catabolic hormone
`Amylin also slows the rate of gastric
`consisting of 29 amino acids. It is
`emptying and, thus, the rate at which
`secreted from pancreatic ␣-cells.
`nutrients are delivered from the stom-
`Described by Roger Unger in the
`ach to the small intestine for absorp-
`1950s, glucagon was characterized as
`tion.29 In addition to its effects on
`opposing the effects of insulin.38
`glucagon secretion and the rate of gas-
`tric emptying, amylin dose-dependently
`Glucagon plays a major role in sus-
`reduces food intake and body weight in
`taining plasma glucose during fasting
`animal models (Table 1).30–32
`conditions by stimulating hepatic glu-
`cose production.
`Amylin exerts its actions primarily
`Unger was the first to describe the
`through the central nervous system.
`diabetic state as a “bi-hormonal” dis-
`Animal studies have identified specific
`ease characterized by insulin deficien-
`calcitonin-like receptor sites for
`cy and glucagon excess. He further
`amylin in regions of the brain, pre-
`speculated that a therapy targeting the
`dominantly in the area postrema. The
`correction of glucagon excess would
`area postrema is a part of the dorsal
`offer an important advancement in
`vagal complex of the brain stem. A
`the treatment of diabetes.38
`notable feature of the area postrema is
`that it lacks a blood-brain barrier,
`Hepatic glucose production, which
`allowing exposure to rapid changes in
`is primarily regulated by glucagon,
`
`186
`
`Diabetes Spectrum Volume 17, Number 3, 2004
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2006
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01563
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Feature Article/Aronoff et al.
`
`DIABETES PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
`Our understanding of the pathophysi-
`ology of diabetes is evolving. Type 1
`diabetes has been characterized as an
`autoimmune-mediated destruction of
`pancreatic ␤-cells.60 The resulting defi-
`ciency in insulin also means a deficien-
`cy in the other cosecreted and colocat-
`ed ␤-cell hormone, amylin.25 As a
`result, postprandial glucose concen-
`trations rise due to lack of insulin-
`stimulated glucose disappearance,
`poorly regulated hepatic glucose pro-
`duction, and increased or abnormal
`gastric emptying following a meal.61
`Early in the course of type 2 dia-
`betes, postprandial ␤-cell action
`becomes abnormal, as evidenced by
`the loss of immediate insulin response
`to a meal.62 Peripheral insulin resis-
`tance coupled with progressive ␤-cell
`failure and decreased availability of
`insulin, amylin, and GLP-163 con-
`tribute to the clinical picture of hyper-
`glycemia in diabetes.
`Abnormal gastric emptying is com-
`mon to both type 1 and type 2 dia-
`betes. The rate of gastric emptying is a
`key determinant of postprandial glu-
`cose concentrations (Figure 5).64 If
`gastric emptying is accelerated, then
`the presentation of meal-derived glu-
`cose to the circulation is poorly timed
`with insulin delivery. In individuals
`with diabetes, the absent or delayed
`secretion of insulin further exacer-
`bates postprandial hyperglycemia.
`Both amylin and GLP-1 regulate gas-
`tric emptying by slowing the delivery
`of nutrients from the stomach to the
`small intestine.
`
`REPLACEMENT OF INSULIN
`For the past 80 years, insulin has been
`the only pharmacological alternative,
`but it has replaced only one of the hor-
`monal compounds required for glu-
`cose homeostasis. Newer formulations
`of insulin and insulin secretagogues,
`such as sulfonylureas and meglitinides,
`have facilitated improvements in
`glycemic control. While sulfonylureas
`and meglitinides have been used to
`directly stimulate pancreatic ␤-cells to
`secrete insulin, insulin replacement still
`has been the cornerstone of treatment
`for type 1 and advanced type 2 dia-
`betes for decades. Advances in insulin
`therapy have included not only
`improving the source and purity of the
`hormone, but also developing more
`physiological means of delivery.
`
`Figure 4. Insulin and glucagon secretion: nondiabetic and diabetic subjects. In
`nondiabetic subjects (left panel), glucose-stimulated insulin and amylin release
`from the ␤-cells results in suppression of postprandial glucagon secretion. In a
`subject with type 1 diabetes, infused insulin does not suppress ␣-cell produc-
`tion of glucagon. Adapted from Ref. 38.
`While GIP is a more potent incretin
`hormone, GLP-1 is secreted in greater
`concentrations and is more physiolog-
`ically relevant in humans.47
`GLP-1 also stimulates glucose-
`dependent insulin secretion but is sig-
`nificantly reduced postprandially in
`people with type 2 diabetes or
`impaired glucose tolerance.46,48 GLP-1
`stimulates insulin secretion when plas-
`ma glucose concentrations are high
`but not when plasma glucose concen-
`trations approach or fall below the
`normal range. Derived from the
`proglucagon molecule in the intestine,
`GLP-1 is synthesized and secreted by
`the L-cells found mainly in the ileum
`and colon. Circulating GLP-1 concen-
`trations are low in the fasting state.
`However, both GIP and GLP-1 are
`effectively stimulated by ingestion of a
`mixed meal or meals enriched with
`fats and carbohydrates.49,50 In contrast
`to GIP, GLP-1 inhibits glucagon secre-
`tion and slows gastric emptying.51
`GLP-1 has many glucoregulatory
`effects (Table 1 and Figure 3). In the
`pancreas, GLP-1 stimulates insulin
`secretion in a glucose-dependent man-
`ner while inhibiting glucagon secre-
`tion.52,53 Animal studies have demon-
`strated that the action of GLP-1
`occurs directly through activation of
`GLP-1 receptors on the pancreatic ␤-
`cells and indirectly through sensory
`
`nerves.54 GLP-1 has a plasma half-life
`of about 2 minutes, and its disappear-
`ance is regulated primarily by the
`enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-
`IV), which rapidly cleaves and inacti-
`vates GLP-1.
`Infusion of GLP-1 lowers postpran-
`dial glucose as well as overnight fast-
`ing blood glucose concentrations.55
`The postprandial effect of GLP-1 is
`partly due to inhibition of glucagon
`secretion. Yet while GLP-1 inhibits
`glucagon secretion in the fed state, it
`does not appear to blunt glucagon’s
`response to hypoglycemia.56 GLP-1
`helps regulate gastric emptying and
`gastric acid secretion,17 perhaps by
`signalling GLP-1 receptors in the
`brain and thereby stimulating efferent
`tracts of the vagus nerve.56 As gastric
`emptying slows, the postprandial glu-
`cose excursion is reduced.
`Administration of GLP-1 has been
`associated with the regulation of feed-
`ing behavior and body weight.57,58 In
`addition, there have been reported
`observations of GLP-1 improving
`insulin sensitivity and enhancing glu-
`cose disposal.58
`Of significant and increasing inter-
`est is the role GLP-1 may have in
`preservation of ␤-cell function and ␤-
`cell proliferation.59 In animal studies,
`GLP-1 has been shown to enhance
`functional ␤-cell mass.59
`
`Diabetes Spectrum Volume 17, Number 3, 2004
`
`187
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2006
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01563
`Page 5
`
`

`
`Feature Article/Beyond Insulin and Glucagon
`
`as the role of incretin hormones has
`been elucidated. Incretin hormones
`play a role in helping regulate glucose
`appearance and in enhancing insulin
`secretion. Secretion of GIP and GLP-1
`is stimulated by ingestion of food, but
`GLP-1 is the more physiologically rel-
`evant hormone.71,72
`However, replacing GLP-1 in its
`natural state poses biological chal-
`lenges. In clinical trials, continuous
`subcutaneous or intravenous infusion
`was superior to single or repeated
`injections of GLP-1 because of the
`rapid degradation of GLP-1 by DPP-
`IV.
`To circumvent this intensive and
`expensive mode of treatment, clinical
`development of compounds that elicit
`similar glucoregulatory effects to
`those of GLP-1 are being investigated.
`These compounds, termed incretin
`mimetics, have a longer duration of
`action than native GLP-1. In addition
`to incretin mimetics, research indi-
`cates that DPP-IV inhibitors may
`improve glucose control by increasing
`the action of native GLP-1. These new
`classes of investigational compounds
`have the potential to enhance insulin
`secretion and suppress prandial
`glucagon secretion in a glucose-depen-
`dent manner, regulate gastric empty-
`ing, and reduce food intake.73 Lastly,
`incretin mimetics may also play a role
`in preservation of ␤-cell function and
`␤-cell proliferation.
`
`SUMMARY
`Despite current advances in pharma-
`cological therapies for diabetes,
`attaining and maintaining optimal
`glycemic control has remained elusive
`and daunting. Intensified management
`clearly has been associated with
`decreased risk of complications.6,74
`Yet, despite this scientific understand-
`ing, the average hemoglobin A1c in
`patients with diabetes in the United
`States is > 9%.75
`Glucose regulation is an exquisite
`orchestration of many hormones,
`both pancreatic and gut, that exert
`effect on multiple target tissues, such
`as muscle, brain, liver, and adipocyte.
`While health care practitioners and
`patients have had multiple therapeutic
`options for the past 10 years, both
`continue to struggle to achieve and
`maintain good glycemic control.
`Currently available therapies do not
`perfectly address many of the abnor-
`
`REGULATION OF GLUCAGON
`ACTION
`Clearly, insulin replacement therapy
`has been an important step toward
`restoration of glucose homeostasis.
`But it is only part of the ultimate solu-
`tion. The vital relationship between
`insulin and glucagon has suggested
`additional areas for treatment. With
`inadequate concentrations of insulin
`and elevated concentrations of
`glucagon in the portal vein,
`glucagon’s actions are excessive, con-
`tributing to an endogenous and
`unnecessary supply of glucose in the
`fed state. To date, no pharmacological
`means of regulating glucagon exist
`and the need to decrease postprandial
`glucagon secretion remains a clinical
`target for future therapies.
`
`Figure 5. Gastric emptying rate is an important determinant of postprandial
`glycemia. In nondiabetic subjects (n = 16), plasma glucose concentration
`increases as the rate of gastric emptying increases (r = 0.58, P < 0.05). Adapted
`from Ref. 64.
`Clearly, there are limitations that
`hinder normalizing blood glucose
`using insulin alone. First, exogenous-
`ly administered insulin does not
`mimic endogenous insulin secretion.
`In normal physiology, the liver is
`exposed to a two- to fourfold
`increase in insulin concentration
`compared to the peripheral circula-
`tion.65 Peripherally injected insulin
`does not approach this ratio, thus
`resulting in inadequate hepatic glu-
`cose suppression.66–68 Second,
`insulin’s paracrine suppression of
`glucagon is limited in diabetes and
`inadequately compensated for by
`peripherally delivered insulin
`(Figures 1C, 1D). In the postprandial
`state, when glucagon concentrations
`should be low and glycogen stores
`should be rebuilt, there is a paradox-
`ical elevation of glucagon and deple-
`tion of glycogen stores.69 And final-
`ly, therapeutically increasing insulin
`doses results in further peripheral
`hyperinsulinemia, which may predis-
`pose the individual to hypoglycemia
`and weight gain. As demonstrated in
`the Diabetes Control and
`Complications Trial and the United
`Kingdom Prospective Diabetes
`Study, intensified care is not without
`risk. In both studies, those subjects
`in the intensive therapy groups expe-
`rienced a two- to threefold increase
`in severe hypoglycemia.4,6
`Additionally, intensification of dia-
`betes management was associated
`with weight gain.70
`
`AMYLIN ACTIONS
`It is now evident that glucose appear-
`ance in the circulation is central to
`glucose homeostasis, and this aspect is
`not addressed with exogenously
`administered insulin. Amylin works
`with insulin and suppresses glucagon
`secretion. It also helps regulate gastric
`emptying, which in turn influences the
`rate of glucose appearance in the cir-
`culation. A synthetic analog of human
`amylin that binds to the amylin recep-
`tor, an amylinomimetic agent, is in
`development.
`
`GLP-1 ACTIONS
`The picture of glucose homeostasis
`has become clearer and more complex
`
`188
`
`Diabetes Spectrum Volume 17, Number 3, 2004
`
`Boehringer Ex. 2006
`Mylan v. Boehringer Ingelheim
`IPR2016-01563
`Page 6
`
`

`
`malities and/or deficiencies of type 1
`or type 2 diabetes.
`There remains a need for new
`interventions that complement our
`current therapeutic armamentarium
`without some of their clinical short-
`comings such as the risk of hypo-
`glycemia and weight gain. These
`evolving therapies offer the potential
`for more effective management of dia-
`betes from a multi-hormonal perspec-
`tive (Figure 3) and are now under
`clinical development.
`References
`1American Diabetes Association: Clinical Practice
`Recommendations 2004. Diabetes Care 27
`(Suppl. 1):S1–S150, 2004
`
`2Hirsch IB: Type 1 diabetes mellitus and the use
`of flexible insulin regimens. Am Fam Physician
`60:2343–2352, 2355–2356, 1999
`
`3Bolli GB, Di Marchi RD, Park GD, Pramming
`S, Koivisto VA: Insulin analogues and their
`potential in the management of diabetes mellitus.
`Diabetologia 42:1151–1167, 1999
`
`4DCCT Research Group: Hypoglycemia in the
`Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.
`Diabetes 46:271–286, 1997
`
`5DCCT Research Group: Weight gain associated
`with intensive therapy in the Diabetes Control
`and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care
`11:567–573, 1988
`
`6UKPDS Study Group: Intensive blood-glucose
`control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared
`with conventional treatment and risk of compli-
`cations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet
`352:837–853, 1998
`
`7Buse JB, Weyer C, Maggs DG: Amylin replace-
`ment with pramlintide in type 1 and type 2 dia-
`betes: a physiological approach to overcome bar-
`riers with insulin therapy. Clinical Diabetes
`20:137–144, 2002
`
`8Moore CX, Cooper GJS: Co-secretion of amylin
`and insulin from cultured islet beta-cells: modu-
`lation by nutrient secretagogues, islet hormones
`and hypoglycaemic agents. Biochem Biophys Res
`Commun 179:1–9, 1991
`
`9Naslund E, Bogefors J, Skogar S, Gryback P,
`Jacobsson H, Holst JJ, Hellstrom PM: GLP-1
`slows solid gastric emptying and inhibits insulin,
`glucagon, and PYY release in humans. Am J
`Physiol 277:R910–R916, 1999
`
`10Cooper GJS, Willis AC, Clark A, Turner RD,
`Sim RB, Reid KB: Purification and characteriza-
`tion of a peptide from amyloid-rich pancreas of
`type 2 diabetic patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci
`U S A 84:8628–8632, 1987
`
`11Wallum BJ, Kahn SE, McCulloch DK, Porte D:
`Insulin secretion in the normal and diabetic
`human. In International Textbook of Diabetes
`Mellitus. Alberti KGMM, DeFronzo RA, Keen
`H, Zimmet P, Eds. Chichester, U.K., John Wiley
`and Sons, 1992, p. 285–301
`
`12Lefebvre PJ: Glucagon and its family revisited.
`
`Feature Article/Aronoff et al.
`
`Diabetes Care 18:715–730, 1995
`
`13Cryer PE: Glucose homeostasis and hypogly-
`caemia. In William’s Textbook of
`Endocrinology. Wilson JD, Foster DW, Eds.
`Philadelphia, Pa., W.B. Saunders Company,
`1992, p. 1223–1253
`
`14Gerich JE: Control of glycaemia. Baillieres Best
`Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 7:551–586,
`1993
`
`15Gerich JE, Schneider V, Dippe SE, Langlois M,
`Noacco C, Karam J, Forsham P: Characteriza-
`tion of the glucagon response to hypoglycemia in
`man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 38:77–82, 1974
`
`16Holst JJ: Glucagon-like peptide 1: a newly dis-
`covered gastrointestinal hormone.
`Gastroenterology 107:1848–1855, 1994
`
`17Drucker DJ: Minireview: the glucagon-like pep-
`tides. Endocrinology 142:521–527, 2001
`
`18Ogawa A, Harris V, McCorkle SK, Unger RH,
`Luskey KL: Amylin secretion from the rat pan-
`creas and its selective loss after streptozotocin
`treatment. J Clin Invest 85:973–976, 1990
`
`19Koda JE, Fineman M, Rink TJ, Dailey GE,
`Muchmore DB, Linarelli LG: Amylin concentra-
`tions and glucose control. Lancet
`339:1179–1180, 1992
`
`20Data on file, Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San
`Diego, Calif.
`
`21Weyer C, Maggs DG, Young AA, Kolterman
`OG: Amylin replacement with pramlintide as an
`adjunct to insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2
`diabetes mellitus: a physiological approach
`toward improved metabolic control. Curr Pharm
`Des 7:1353–1373, 2001
`
`22Koda JE, Fineman MS, Kolterman OG, Caro
`JF: 24 hour plasma amylin profiles are elevated
`in IGT subjects vs. normal controls (Abstract).
`Diabetes 44 (Suppl. 1):238A, 1995
`
`23Fineman MS, Giotta MP, Thompson RG,
`Kolte

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket