throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LIMESTONE MEMORY SYSTEMS LLC,
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01561
`Patent No. 6,233,181
`____________________
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO PATENT OWNER’S
`EVIDENCE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`Submitted Electroncially via PTAB E2E
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioner Apple Inc. (“Petitioner”)
`
`hereby timely objects to evidence submitted by Patent Owner Limestone Memory
`
`Systems LLC (“Patent Owner”) with the Patent Owner Response (Paper 13) filed
`
`May 9, 2017. The objections are based on 37 C.F.R. Part 42, and the relevant
`
`portions of Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) that are applicable to IPR
`
`proceedings under 37 C.F.R. § 42.62.
`
`1. Exhibit 2011 (Fairchild Semiconductor, 74F538 1-of-8 Decoder with 3-
`
`STATE Outputs (April 1988), available at
`
`http://www.komponenten.es.aau.dk/fileadmin/komponenten/Data_Sheet/MO
`
`S-TTL/f/74F538.pdf) should be excluded for at least the following reasons:
`
`the exhibit constitutes hearsay under FRE 801 and 802 (the Patent Owner
`
`relies on the exhibit for the truth of what it states and has not shown a
`
`hearsay exception that applies); the exhibit lacks authentication under FRE
`
`901 and 902 (no authenticating information has been provided to support a
`
`finding that the website associated with the exhibit is accurately depicting
`
`the original datasheet for the 74F538 chip); and the exhibit is not relevant
`
`under FRE 402 (the exhibit includes a copyright date of 2004, which is six
`
`years after the priority date of U.S. Patent No. 6,233,181) and needlessly
`
`presents cumulative evidence under FRE 403 (the Patent Owner relies on the
`
`exhibit merely to corroborate the pin names in FIG. 2 of Walck).
`
`1
`
`

`

`2. Exhibit 2014 (Search results for “APD/19760101->19980609 AND DRAM”
`
`in the USPTO Patent Full Text and Image Database) should be excluded for
`
`at least the following reasons: the exhibit constitutes hearsay under FRE 801
`
`and 802 (the Patent Owner relies on the exhibit for the truth of what it states
`
`and has not shown a hearsay exception that applies); and the exhibit is not
`
`relevant under FRE 402 and confuses the issues and wastes time under FRE
`
`403 (the Patent Owner has not provided information as to how a general
`
`search for “DRAM” in the USPTO Patent Full Text and Image Database is
`
`relevant to the specific combination of Sukegawa and Fujishima).
`
`3. Exhibit 2015 (Search results for “APD/19760101->19980609 AND (DRAM
`
`and "redundant memory")” in the in the USPTO Patent Full Text and Image
`
`Database) should be excluded for at least the following reasons: the exhibit
`
`constitutes hearsay under FRE 801 and 802 (the Patent Owner relies on the
`
`exhibit for the truth of what it states and has not shown a hearsay exception
`
`that applies); and the exhibit is not relevant under FRE 402 and confuses the
`
`issues and wastes time under FRE 403 (the Patent Owner has not provided
`
`information as to how a general search for “DRAM” and “redundant
`
`memory” in the USPTO Patent Full Text and Image Database is relevant to
`
`the specific combination of Sukegawa and Fujishima).
`
`4. Exhibit 2016 (Search results for “APD/19760101->19980609 AND
`
`2
`
`

`

`ICL/G11C07/00 OR ICL/G11C011/34 OR ICL/G11C013/00” in the in the
`
`USPTO Patent Full Text and Image Database) should be excluded for at
`
`least the following reasons: the exhibit constitutes hearsay under FRE 801
`
`and 802 (the Patent Owner relies on the exhibit for the truth of what it states
`
`and has not shown a hearsay exception that applies); and the exhibit is not
`
`relevant under FRE 402 and confuses the issues and wastes time under FRE
`
`403 (the Patent Owner has not provided information as to how a general
`
`search for patents having the same classification as any of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,233,181, Sukegawa, or Fujishima is relevant to the specific combination of
`
`Sukegawa and Fujishima).
`
`
`
`
`
`These objections have been timely filed and served within FIVE business
`
`days of service of evidence, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1).
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/John R. Hutchins/
`John R. Hutchins (Reg. No. 43,686)
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`johnhutchins@andrewskurthkenyon.com
`Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`1350 I Street, NW, Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20005
`T: 202.662.2700
`F: 202.662.2739
`
`Rose Cordero Prey (admitted pro hac vice)
`roseprey@andrewskurthkenyon.com
`Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`T: 212.425.7200
`F: 212.425.5288
`
`Michael Zachary (admitted pro hac vice)
`michaelzachary@andrewskurthkenyon.com
`Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`T: 650.384.4700
`F: 650.384.4701
`
`
`
`Dated: May 16, 2017
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, that a true
`
`and correct copy of PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO PATENT OWNER’S
`
`EVIDENCE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) has been served on the Patent
`
`Owner’s attorneys of record via email, on May 16, 2017 at the following
`
`addresses:
`
`Nicholas T. Peters (Reg. No. 53,456)
`David A. Gosse (Reg. No. 61,511)
`Paul B. Henkelmann (Reg. No. 65,891)
`FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY, LLP
`120 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1600
`Chicago, Illinois 60603-3406
`Telephone: (312) 577-7000
`Facsimile: (312) 577-7007
`Email: LimestoneIPR@fitcheven.com
`
`/John R. Hutchins/
`John R. Hutchins (Reg. No. 43,686)
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 16, 2017
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket