`571–272–7822
`
`Entered: October 13, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, KEVIN F. TURNER, and
`GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Amended Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`
`
`On October 4, 2017, we issued a trial order in IPR2016-01520,
`granting the parties requests for oral hearing. Paper 34. On the same date,
`the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Aqua
`Products, Inc. v. Matal, No. 2015-1177, 2017 WL 4399000 (Fed. Cir. Oct.
`4, 2017) (“Aqua Products”). Given this decision, we reach out to the parties
`again regarding minor changes to the oral hearing.
`Most aspects of the prior hearing order remain in effect. For example,
`the oral argument for this case still will be heard on Thursday, October 26,
`2017, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street,
`Alexandria, Virginia. The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern
`Time.
`In addition, each party will continue to have forty five (45) minutes of
`total time to present arguments. Petitioner will proceed first to present its
`case with regard to the challenged claims and grounds on which we
`instituted trial. In light of Aqua Products, however, Petitioner may also
`address the Contingent Motion to Amend in its initial remarks. After
`Petitioner’s presentation, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s
`arguments. Petitioner may reserve time to respond to arguments presented
`by Patent Owner in rebuttal.
`As well, to allow for discussion of the sur-Reply authorized on
`October 11, 2017, demonstrative exhibits must be served at least three (3)
`business days before the hearing, with the parties providing a courtesy copy
`of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least two (2) business days
`prior to the hearing by emailing them to Trials@upto.gov. The parties must
`file any objections to the demonstratives with the Board at least two (2)
`business days before the hearing.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the oral argument shall commence
`at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, on Thursday, October 26, 2017, on the ninth
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia as
`set forth above.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`Marcus E. Sernel
`Joel R. Merkin
`Gregory S. Arovas
`Alan Rabinowitz
`KIRKLAND &ELLIS LLP
`msernel@kirkland.com
`jmerkin@kirkland.com
`garovas@kirkland.com
`arabinowitz@kirkland.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Douglas Kline
`Jennifer Albert
`Sarah Fink
`Stephen Schreiner
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`dkline@goodwinprocter.com
`jalbert@goodwinprocter.com
`sfink@goodwinlaw.com
`sschreiner@goodwinprocter.com
`DG-PMC-Apple@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Thomas J. Scott, Jr.
`tscott@pmcip.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
