throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571–272–7822
`
`Paper 34
`Entered: October 4, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, KEVIN F. TURNER, and
`GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`
`
`On February 15, 2017, we entered a Decision to Institute a trial
`proceeding in IPR2016-01520. Paper 7. A Scheduling Order in the case set
`the date for oral hearing, if requested by either party, as October 26, 2017.
`Paper 8. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, both parties have requested an oral
`hearing. Papers 32, 33. Petitioner’s and Patent Owner’s requests for oral
`hearing are granted.
`The oral argument for this case will be heard on Thursday, October
`26, 2017, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street,
`Alexandria, Virginia. The hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern
`Time. The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance. In
`person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come-first-served basis.
`If the parties have any concern about disclosing confidential information,
`they are to contact the Board at least five (5) business days in advance of the
`hearing to discuss the matter. The Board will provide a court reporter for the
`hearing and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the
`hearing.
`Each party will have forty five (45) minutes of total time to present
`arguments. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the claims at
`issue are unpatentable, and Patent Owner bears the burden of proof with
`respect to its Contingent Motion to Amend. Petitioner will proceed first to
`present its case with regard to the challenged claims and grounds on which
`we instituted trial. After Petitioner’s presentation, Patent Owner will
`respond to Petitioner’s argument and also argue in support of its Contingent
`Motion to Amend.
`Each side may reserve time to respond to arguments presented by the
`other side with some limitations. More specifically, to the extent that
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`
`Petitioner reserves rebuttal time, it may respond to Patent Owner’s
`presentation on all matters. Patent Owner may respond only to Petitioner’s
`arguments opposing the motion to amend in rebuttal.
`Furthermore, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits
`must be served at least seven (7) business days before the hearing. The
`parties shall provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the
`Board at least three (3) business days prior to the hearing by emailing them
`to Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in
`the records of these proceedings without prior authorization from the Board.
`The demonstrative exhibits in this case are not evidence and are intended
`only to assist the parties in presenting their oral argument to the Board.
`The parties must, however, file any objections to the demonstratives
`with the Board at least three (3) business days before the hearing. Any
`objection to the demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be
`considered waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection, and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at oral
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`
`whole or in part. If lead counsel for either party will not be in attendance at
`oral hearing, the Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference
`call no later than three (3) business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss
`the matter.
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored
`unless presented in a separate communication not less than five (5) business
`days before the hearing directed to the above email address.
`Multiple judges will be participating remotely via a videoconferencing
`device and will not be able to view the projection screen in the hearing
`room. The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during the hearing to avoid confusion, and to ensure the clarity
`and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the oral argument shall commence
`at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, on Thursday, October 26, 2017, on the ninth
`floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia as
`set forth above.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01520
`Patent 8,559,635 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`Marcus E. Sernel
`Joel R. Merkin
`KIRKLAND &ELLIS LLP
`marc.sernel@kirkland.com
`joel.merkin@kirkland.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Douglas Kline
`Jennifer Albert
`Stephen Schreiner
`Krupa K. Parikh
`April E. Weisbruch
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`dkline@goodwinprocter.com
`jalbert@goodwinprocter.com
`sschreiner@goodwinprocter.com
`kparikh@goodwinlaw.com
`aweisbruch@goodwinlaw.com
`DG-PMC-Apple@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Thomas J. Scott, Jr.
`tscott@pmcip.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket