throbber

`
`mlJtl
`
`IJU
`
`7/26/83
`
`JR
`
`X9.
`
`4-;39‘59734
`
`United States Patent
`Rypkema
`145]
`
`[191
`
`[11]
`
`4,395,734
`
`Jul. 26, 1983
`
`[54]
`
`[75]
`
`[73]
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`[51]
`[52}
`
`[53]
`
`[56]
`
`REMOTE MUTING FOR CATV/SW
`CONVERTERS
`
`Inventor:
`
`Assignee:
`
`Jouke N. Rypkema, Lombard, Ill.
`
`Zenith Radio Corporation, Glenview,
`Ill.
`
`App]. No.: 257,074
`
`Filed:
`
`Apr. 24, 1981
`
`Int. (31.3 ......................... HMN 7/16; HIM-N 7/ 12
`US. Cl. ............................... .. 358/194.1; 358/ 193;
`358/805
`Field of Search ................. .. 455/1, 3, 4, 203, 212;
`353/118, 121, 194.1, 198, 196, 160. 188. 904, 86
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`8/1965 Brownstein ....................... .. 358/118
`3.202.758
`3,760,097 9/1973 Burroughs
`...... 455/1
`3,896,262
`'i/1975 Hudspeth .............................. .. 455/1
`
`
`
`Primary Exami'neraMichael' A. Wasinick
`Attorney, Agent. or Firm—Jack Kail
`
`[5?]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A television signal processing apparatus is responsive to
`a received television signal for translating the frequency
`spectrum thereof to a frequency band characterized by
`a fixed frequency carrier signal frequency modulated in
`accordance with a baseband audio signal. The fre-
`quency modulated carrier signal is combined with an
`unmodulated CW muting signal having a frequency
`approximately equal to the frequency of the carrier
`signal to facilitate remotely controlled muting of the
`baseband audio signal in accordance with the FM cap-
`ture effect.
`
`
`
`7 Claims, 5 Drawing Figures
`
`1 I\J"""—-—_-"‘‘\.
`
`
`I
`
`L..—
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1
`
`

`

`etaPQM
`
`tmmH3,
`
`6|.—J.‘OmofidamoMmmfiozqm.448..
`
`9
`
`I
`
`1x.v?2t\rII3.eamx.
`I-II29.55%aw».«.8358..mzzqzuHn.209o.|
`
`
`
`II,...
`
`3,avmfifigomo402:35.mm.
`mmE
`
`
`
`S__
`
`u55:Acub:uh:n:'Emacs3%.m3_>%_onmmmmmm1_ON3.3Na
`
`4MIBPi_or.
`
`mmmmmv.aP..mb1X0.0E0.2CAm
`wcmz
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 2
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 26, 1983-
`
`Sheet 2 of5
`
`4,395,734
`
`34
`
`32
`
`36'
`
`38
`
`BANDPASS
`
`LOCAL
`
`OSCILLATOR _
`
`FROM
`
`28
`
`FILTER
`
`MUTING
`
`
`
`OSCILLATOR
`
`REMOTE
`CONTROL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TRANSMITTER
`
`
`
`REMOTE
`CONTROL
`RECEIVER
`
`
`
`
`FIG.
`
`IA
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 3
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 3
`
`

`

`3
`
`t
`
`mJ
`
`eh
`
`3
`
`93.,
`
`3NM.PmmFe
`‘m.EU:9..moajamo6mm$3023
`439
`
`%n._M,mu2mmon
`
`Scm
`aI
`%@Ea
`
`5NWM.«v
`8>$330..I’0NI:3
`ESE‘.
`
`om
`
`4Nm.\
`
`4MI3P7:.5No:
`
`t.0amvaP..mb1awmCAm
`0C04
`mmmw
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 4
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jul. 26, 1983
`
`Sheet 4 of5
`
`4,395,734
`
`K"
`
`a
`
`22
`
`m
`E
`.5.
`—I
`
`a:
`m
`Q
`IL
`
`"33
`
`N k
`
`E
`I»_-,
`EI
`
`g
`N)
`
`38
`
`:2
`
`FX
`
`v
`"3
`
`’0O
`
`6
`1—
`43
`=I
`§8
`_IO
`
`
`
`w
`fin:
`old
`$9
`u.
`
`a?
`
`g
`659.5
`3'3
`9:
`
`Q
`0:.
`
`0
`3
`
`20 6’2
`
`‘
`
`=”
`
`wfo
`
`v
`no
`
`PO
`
`2
`“-
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 5
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 5
`
`

`

`S.
`
`00
`
`5
`
`93.,4
`
`3mm
`
`m.Evmmmm0mmmmmmm.mmmmkuzn.3QmOammEozqm§.269Pmm
`w.6,.55:mfits...$5.“.IA“:O".
`.mmmm3.
`
`M5.5....
`
`0v.0mmdm..59
`
`mmX\mmmvm
`
`
`
`quzzqmooxamm8%ZOFUMIEmawn—55%.mzzqzo
`
`
`
`5,v2m
`4MwBP
`
`C
`
`mmmmmv.aPmm1XD.0EM.m
`moms
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 6
`
`
`

`

`
`
`4,395,734
`
`2
`with the accompanying drawings, in which like refer-
`ence numerals identify like elements in the several fig»
`ores and in which:
`
`1
`
`REMOTE MUTING FOR CATV/SW
`CONVERTERS
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates generally to radio fre«
`quency receivers including television receivers and
`ancillary signal translating devices such as cable televi-
`sion converters and, in particular, to a remotely coutrol-
`lable television signal tanslating device having a sound
`muting capability.
`Television signal translating devices such as cable
`television couverters and the like are operative for con-
`verting a received television signal from one RF fre-
`quency to another RF frequency compatible with the
`signal processing characteristics of a conventional tele-
`Vision receiver. For example, a cable television con-
`verter is typically operated in response to a remotely
`generated tuning control signal for selectively convert-
`ing one of a plurality of cable television channels to a
`channel 3 or 4 television signal which is then supplied to
`the antenna inputs of a television receiver. The signal
`translation process is normally accomplished by initially
`converting the received cable television signal to an IF
`frequency and then suitably rte-converting the IF signal
`to the channel 3 or 4 RF carrier frequency.
`While remote tuning of cable television converters is
`generally well known in the art, various other desirable
`remote control features, e.g. sound muting, have hereto-
`fore not been available. With particular reference to
`remotely controllable sound muting, this feature is typi-
`cally provided in a conventional television receiver by
`suitably controlling a switch or the like for grounding
`or otherwise rendering the audio baseband signal devel-
`oped at the output of an FM demodulator unavailable to
`the speakers of the television receiver. It will be appre-
`ciated that this technique is not applicable to a signal
`translating device such as a cable television converter
`since the audio signal is not developed in such devices in
`a baseband form. Although a remotely operated trap.
`either at the IF or RF audio frequency, can be used to
`remove the sound carrier in the converter,
`this ap-
`proach suffers from the disadvantage that only random
`noise is coupled to the audio processing circuits of the
`television receiver from the cable converter whereby a
`clearly audible noisy signal is produced.
`It is therefore a basic object of the present invention
`to provide an improved remotely controllable sound
`muting system for use in association with a radio fre-
`quency receiver such as a television signal precessing
`apparatus.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`remotely controllable sound muting capability for a
`television signal translating device which is effective in
`the IF and RF frequency spectrums.
`It is yet another object of the invention to provide a
`remotely controllable sound muting capability for a
`television signal translating device wherein a frequency
`translated television signal is produced for application
`to a television receiver in a form inhibiting the produc-
`tion of any sound, including noise, by the receiver.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The features of this invention which are believed to
`be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended
`claims. The invention, together with its objects and the
`advantages thereof, may best be understood by refer-
`ence to the following description taken in conjunction
`
`65
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`FIG. 1 is a block diagram generally illustrating the
`apparatus of the present invention:
`FIG. 1A is a block diagram illustrating an alternate
`embodiment of the apparatus of the invention;
`FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating another alter-
`nate embodiment of the apparatus of the invention;
`FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a further em-
`bodiment of the apparatus of the invention; and
`FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating yet another
`embodiment of the apparatus of the invention.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates a con-
`ventional cable television converter operable for trans-
`lating a television signal received over a cable television
`channel to a channel, typically channel 3 or 4, usable by
`a conventional television receiver. In this regard, it is to
`be understood that while the principles of the present
`invention will be explained in connectiOn with the cou-
`verting device shown in FIG. 1, such is intended as
`exemplary only and should therefore not be taken to
`impose any unnecessary limitations on the invention.
`Thus,
`in general terms, the principles of the present
`invention are equally applicable to any radio frequency
`signal processing apparatus wherein an angle modu-
`lated carrier, the angle modulation being either of the
`frequency or phase type, is developed including con-
`ventional television receivers, cable television convert-
`ers, subscription televisiou decoders and the like.
`With specific reference now to FIG. 1, the illustrated
`cable television converter comprises an antenna 12 sup-
`plying received cable television signals to a conven-
`tional supersherodyne television-type tuning system 14.
`Tuning system 14 comprises a single tuned RF input
`filter 16 whose output is connected through an RF
`amplifier 18 to the input of a double-tuned RF filter 20.
`The output of double tuned filter 20 is applied to a mixer
`22 which mixes the received RF television signal with
`the output of a local oscillator 24 for developing an
`output intermediate frequency (IF) signal. Single tuned
`filter 16, double tuned filter 20 and local oscillator 24
`are controlled by a channel selection device 25 such
`that each of a plurality of cable television channels may
`be converted to intermediate frequency signals having
`the same fixed frequencies. In particular, each received
`RF television signal is converted to a 45.75 MHZ ampli-
`tude modulated picture IF carrier signal and a 41.25
`MHz frequency modulated sound IF carrier signal. The
`IF signals are coupled through a first IF carrier signal.
`The IF signals are coupled through a first IF filter 26,
`an IF amplifer 28 and a second IF filter 30 to one input
`of a second mixer 32. Mixer 32 beats the IF output from
`filter 30 with a signal deveIOped by a second local oscil-
`lator 34 for re-converting the [F signals to RF signals
`corresponding to either channel 3 or channel 4, which
`RF signals are then bandpass filtered by a filter 36 and
`developed as a channel 3 or 4 RF television signal on an
`output 38. The output RF signals are subsequently cou-
`pled to the antenna terminals of a conventional televi-
`sion receiver which will reproduce the video and audio
`signals when tuned to channel 3 or 4.
`In connection with the foregoing description, it will
`be observed that the frequency modulated sound carrier
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 7
`
`

`

`3
`is never converted to a baseband signal in the converter,
`the sound carrier being initially received as an RF sig-
`nal, converted to a 41.25 MHz IF carrier and then re-
`convened to either a 65.75 MHz (channel 3) or a T135
`MHz (channel 4) RF carrier. As a consequence, con«
`ventional sound muting techniques which typically
`operate in terms of baseband audio signals are not appli-
`cable to the converter shown in FIG. 1. Furthermore,
`while a sound trap operating either at the sound IF
`carrier frequency or the channel 3 or 4 sound RF car-
`rier frequency may be provided in an attempt to selec-
`tively mute the sound signal, such a system has an inher-
`ent deficiency resulting in a quite undesirable effect. In
`particular, the FM detection circuits of conventional
`television receivers are known to produce an extremely
`noisy output signal when the receiver is supplied with
`an input signal having no sound carrier components.
`Therefore, if the sound carrier is trapped in the con-
`verter, only random noise will be supplied to the televi-
`sion receiver sound demodulation circuits which will
`consequently produce a noisy output sound signal.
`The foregoing problems are ovecome in accordanCe
`with the present invention by applying the well known
`FM capture effect to achieve a remotely controllable
`sound muting capability in the converter circuit of FIG.
`1. According to the FM capture effect, when two input
`signals are applied to an FM demodulator including a
`limiter. the input wave having the largest magnitude
`within the bandwidth of the demodulator controls the
`output. This principle or phenomenon is utilized in
`accordance with the present invention by injecting an
`unmodulated continuous wave (CW) signal at a suitable
`circuit node in the converter,
`the unmodulated CW
`signal being adapted for overriding or dominating the
`FM sound carrier when applied to the FM demodulator
`of a television receiver with the result that the sound is
`completely muted. For example, referring to FIG. 1, a
`muting oscillator 40 is coupled through a mute switch
`42 to a circuit node 44 formed at the output of IF filter
`30. When switch 42 is closed, muting oscillator 40 is
`adapted for coupling an unmodulated CW signal having
`a frequency of 41.25 MHz (the sound IF carrier fre-
`quency) to circuit node 44 whereby after conversion by
`mixer 32, both the unmodulated CW signal and the FM
`sound carrier are coupled to the FM demodulator of the
`television receiver. By designing the system such that
`the unmodulated CW signal is approximately 2— 10 dB
`stronger than the FM sound carrier. the FM demodula-
`tor in the receiver will be controlled by the CW signal
`only and, since this signal carries no frequency modula-
`tion, a muted sound signal will result. In television re-
`ceivers using intercarrier sound processing techniques,
`the muting signal produced by oscillator 40 is prefera-
`bly maintained to a tolerance of about 21:20 KHz. Also,
`the foregoing circuit may be conveniently realized in a
`remote control system in a variety of ways. For exam-
`ple, and for purposes of illustration only, muting oscilla-
`tor 40 and switch 4-2 may be provided in a hand-held
`remote control unit which is connected to node 44 by a
`suitable length of conductor or by a wireless link in a
`manner similar to the technique normally used to re-
`motely interface channel selection device 25 with the
`converter. Alternatively, the muting oscillator could be
`directly associated with the converter and enabled in
`response to a remotely generated control signal. This
`latter approach is illustrated in FIG. 1A wherein a re-
`mote control transmitter 45, which may comprise, for
`example, an infrared or ultrasonic transmission device,
`
`
`
`4,395,734
`
`4
`is selectively operable for transitting a sound muting
`control signal. The transmitted sound muting control
`signal is received by a remote control receiver 4‘? built
`into the converter, remote control receiver 47 being
`responsive to the received sound muting control signal
`for operating muting oscillator 40 for generating and
`coupling the unmodulated CW muting signal to circuit
`node 44.
`It will be appreciated that the muting signal can be
`injected in the converter circuit at points other than at
`node 44. Thus, as indicated by dotted lines 46 of FIGS.
`1 and 1A and dotted line switch 48 of FIG. 1, the un-
`modulated CW signal could be coupled to the RF out-
`put of the converter circuit. In this case, the unmodu-
`lated muting signal would have a frequency equal to
`either the channel 3 RF sound carrier (65.75 MHz) or
`the channel el- RF sound carrier (71.75 MHz). Other
`than for this difference, the system operation is exactly
`as previously described.
`FIG. 2 illustrates a method for generating the unmod-
`ulated muting signal using phase lock loop techniques.
`In particular, a phase lock loop 50 is provided for cou-
`pling an unmodulated 45.75 MHz CW signal to one
`input of a. mixer 52, the other input of mixer 52 being
`provided with a 4.5 MHz signal from an oscillator 54.
`As a result, mixer 52 develops and couples an unmodu-
`lated 41.25 MHZ muting signal through muting switch
`42 and a filter 43 for application to circuit node 44.
`Phase lock loop 50 cornprises a filter 56 adapted for
`coupling the relatively weak amplitude modulated pic-
`ture IF carrier (45.75 MHz) to the input of an amplitude
`limiter 58. Limiter 58, in turn, couples the 45.?5 MHz
`picture IF carrier to one input of a phase detector 61],
`the other input of phase detector 6|) being derived from
`the output of a voltage controlled oscillator (W30) 62.
`The error signal output of phase detector 60 is coupled
`through a low-pass filter 64 to the control input of VCO
`62. Phase detector 60 is therefore operable for control-
`ling VCO 62 through filter 64 for developing a rela-
`tively strong unmodulated 45.75 MHz signal which, as
`previously explained, is beat with the 4.5 MHz signal
`developed by oscillator 54 to form the muting signal at
`the output of mixer 52.
`FIG. 3 illustrates an adaptation of the circuit of FIG.
`2 where the muting signal is injected into the RF output
`of the converter rather than into the IF signal path.
`Thus, the output amplitude modulated RF picture car-
`rier, e.g. the channel 3 picture carrier at 61.25 MHz,
`developed on conductor 38 is coupled to a phase lock
`100p 70 through a filter 72. Phase lock loop 70 is identi-
`cal to phase lock loop 50 and includes a limiter 14, a
`phase detector 76, a low pass filter 78 and a VCO 80.
`The output of V03 30, which comprises a relatively
`strong unmodulated 61.25 MHz signal, is coupled to one
`input of a mixer 82. the other input to mixer 82 being
`derived from a 4.5 MHz oscillator 84. As a result, mixer
`82 produces an unmodulated CW output muting signal
`at the frequency of the channel 3 RF sound carrier
`(65.75 MHz), the muting signal being selectively in-
`jected into the RF output signal through switch 48 and
`a filter 49. Of course, by appropriately changing the
`bandpass characteristics of filter 72, a similar result can
`be achieved where a channel 4 or, for that matter, any
`other channel signal, is deveIOped on output conductor
`38.
`FIG. 4 illustrates a modification of the circuit of FIG.
`2 where phase lock loop techniques are also used to
`generate the local oscillator signal coupled to mixer 22.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 8
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 8
`
`

`

`5
`In this circuit, the same 4.5 MHz oscillator 54 supplying
`mixer 52 to generate the muting signal is used for sup-
`plying a reference signal for the tuning phase lock loop.
`More specifically, the output of the 4.5 MHz oscillator
`54, after being applied through a frequency divider 91
`which may be programmable, is coupled as a reference
`signal to one input of a phase detector 92 of a tuning
`phase lock loop 90. The error signal output of phase
`detector 92 is coupled through a low pass filter 94 to the
`control input of a voltage controlled local oscillator
`(VCLO) 96 whose output is supplied to mixer 22 and
`also fed-back through a prescaler 98 and a programma-
`ble divider 100 to the second input of phase detector 92.
`The division factor characterizing programmable di-
`vider 100 is controlled by the channel selection device
`such that the output of VCLO 96 is forced to a fre-
`quency appropriate for converting the received RF
`television signal to the proper IF frequencies. Also, it
`will be appreciated that
`the principles illustrated in
`FIG. 4 are equally applicable to the circuit of FIG. 3
`where the muting signal is derived by phase lock loop
`70 which is responsive to the RF output RF picture
`carrier of the converter.
`While particular embodiments of the invention have
`been shown and described,
`it will be apparent
`that
`changes and modifications may be made therein with-
`out departing frorn the invention in its broader aspects.
`For example, it may be desirable in certain situations to
`employ the principles of the invention for muting a 4.5
`MHz frequency modulated intercarrier audio signal by
`combining it with a suitable unmodulated 4.5 MHz CW
`muting signal. Also, it will be appreciated that the prin-
`ciples of the invention may be used in connection with
`various other types of radio frequency receivers and
`with phase modulated carriers as well as frequency
`modulated carriers. The aim of the appended claims,
`therefore, is to cover all such changes and modifications
`as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
`What is claimed is:
`
`1. In a television signal frequency translating device
`having a circuit node developing a first non-baseband
`signal comprising a sound carrier signal frequency mod-
`ulated in accordance with a baseband audio signal and a
`second non-baseband signal comprising a picture carrier
`signal amplitude modulated in accordance with a base-
`band video signal, said sound and picture carrier signals
`being offset from each other by 4.5 MHz, the improve—
`ment comprising:
`phase lock loOp means responsive to said picture
`carrier signal for generating an unmodulated CW
`signal having a frequency substantially equal to the
`frequency of said picture carrier signal and an am-
`plitude substantially greater than said sound carrier
`signal;
`means generating an unmodulated 4.5 MHz signal;
`means mixing said CW signal with said 4.5 MHz
`signal for developing a muting signal having a
`frequency substantially equal to the frequency of
`said sound carrier signal; and
`means operative for coupling said muting signal to
`said circuit node whereby said first non-baseband
`signal is dominated by said muting signal in accor-
`dance with the FM capture effect to facilitate mut-
`ing of said baseband audio signal.
`2. The improvement according to claim 1 wherein
`said television signal frequency translating device in-
`cludes a tuning phase lock loop controlling a local oscil-
`lator for generating a local oscillator signal for translat-
`
`
`
`4,395,?34
`
`6
`ing the frequency spectrum of a received television
`signal from one frequency band to a second frequency
`band, said tuning phase look loop being responsive to a
`reference signal comprising said unmodulated 4.5 MHz
`signal.
`3. A television signal frequency translating apparatus
`comprising:
`means for receiving a television signal broadcast over.
`a first RF frequency band and including a video
`component comprising a modulated RF video car-
`rier and an audio component comprising an RF
`sound carrier frequency modulated in accordance
`with a baseband audio signal;
`means for translating the frequency spectrum of said
`received television signal from said first frequency
`band to a second RF frequency band;
`means _operable for generating a CW signal having a
`frequency substantially equal to the unmodulated
`frequency of said RF sound carrier in said second
`RF frequency band and having an amplitude sub-
`stantially greater then the amplitude of said RF
`sound carrier in said second frequency band; and
`means disposed remotely from said television signal
`frequency translating apparatus for selectively op-
`erating said generating means for injecting said
`CW signal in said second RF frequency band for
`facilitating muting of said baseband audio signal
`without degrading the video component of said
`received television signal.
`4. A television signal frequency translating apparatus
`according to claim 3 wherein said second RF frequency
`band comprises an intermediate frequency band charac-
`terized by a sound carrier having a frequency of about
`41.25 MHz and wherein said generating means oom-
`prises means for generating a CW signal having a fre-
`quency substantially equal to 41.25 MHz and a signal
`strength at least about 2—10 db greater than said inter-
`mediate frequency sound carrier.
`5. A television signal frequency translating apparatus
`according to claim 3 wherein said second RF frequency
`band comprises a selected television channel character-
`ized by a sound carrier having a predetermined RF
`frequency and wherein said generating means com-
`prises means generating a CW signal having a substan-
`tially fixed frequency equal to said predetermined fre-
`quency and a signal strength at least about 2—10 db
`greater than said sound carrier.
`6. A television signal frequency translating apparatus
`comprising
`means for receiving a broadcast television signal in-
`cluding an FM sound carrier;
`means translating the frequency spectrum of said
`received televisiOn signal from one frequency band
`to a second frequency band;
`means for generating an unmodulated 4.5 MHz sig-
`nal;
`phase lock loop means responsive to the picture car-
`rier of said received television signal in said second
`frequency band for generating an unmodulated
`control signal having a frequency substantially
`equal to the frequency of said picture carrier;
`means for mixing said central signal with said 4.5
`MHz signal for deveIOping a CW signal having a
`frequency substantially equal to the frequency of
`said sound carrier in said second frequency band
`and an amplitude substantially greater than the
`amplitude of said sound carrier in said second fre-
`quency band; and
`
`it)
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`SD
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 9
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 9
`
`

`

`4,395,734
`
`7
`means disposed remotely from said television signal
`frequency translating apparatus for selectively in-
`liming said CW_ Signal in said Second freque_ncy
`band for facilitating muting of said squad carries
`7. A television Signal frequency translating apparatus 5
`comprising:
`.
`means for receiving a broadcast television signal in-
`cluding an FM sound carrier;
`'
`means for generating an unmodulated 4.5 MHz sig-
`nal.
`a tuning phase lock loop responsive to said 4.5 MHz
`signal for translating the frequency spectrum of
`said received television signal from one frequency
`band to a second frequency band;
`phase lock loop means responsive to the picture car- 15
`rier of said received television in said second fre-
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`
`Apple v. PMC
`|PR2016-01520
`
`Page 10
`
`8
`quency band for generating an unmodulated con-
`11-91 signal having a frequency substantially equal to
`the frequency of said picture carrier;
`means for mixing said control signal with said 4.5
`MHZ signal for developing 3 CW signal having a
`frequency substantially equal to the frequency of
`said sound carrier in said second frequency band
`and an amplitude substantially greater than the
`amplitude of said sound carrier in said second fre-
`clue“? band? and
`‘
`_
`'
`‘
`_
`I
`means'dISPOSEd Temfitely from said REVISE?“ 931211
`frequency Hamming apparatus for SEIECEIWI)’ 111-
`jecting said CW signal in said second frequency
`hand for facilitating muting of said sound carrier.
`*
`*
`*
`1*
`*
`
`.
`
`m
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3D
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`PMC Exhibit 2030
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket