throbber
Page 1
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 2
`
`

`

`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 3
`
`a I
`
`nteractive Videotex
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Interactive
`Videotex
`The Domesticated
`Computer
`
`Dimitris N. Chorafas
`
`
`
`Q petrocelll book
`new york/princeton
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 4
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Copyright @ 1981 Petrocelli Books, Inc.
`All rights reserved.
`Printed in United States
`12345678910
`
`Designed by Bruce Campbell
`Typesetting by Backes Graphics
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
`Chorafas, Dimitris N
`Interactive Videotex,
`
`Bibliography: p.
`Includes Index,
`1, Viewdata (Data transmission system) I. Title,
`TKS105.C52
`384.648
`80-39566
`ISBN 0-89433-127-2
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 5
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`Contents
`
`Preface
`1 Technology
`Early Discoveries / The Next Vital Steps / Quantification /
`Communications / Inventions / The Economy of Mass
`2 Interactive Videotex
`What Is Viewdata? / An intriguing Possibility / The Early
`Years / Gaining Experience / Working with the System /
`Dialing Up
`3 Using Viewdata
`Use at Home/ Press the Button / Signal Processing / The
`Terminal Facility / Getting Online / Menu Selection
`4 The Viewdatabase
`Pages and Screenfulls / Queries / Information Providers /
`Gateways / Data Integrity / Viewdatabase Organization
`§ An Information Utility
`Challenging the U.S. Postal Service and Ma Bell / Toward
`Economical Solutions / What Is a Utility? / A Range of
`Possibilities / The Cutting Edge of Competition / Paying the
`Bill / Connection Charges / Home Computers and the Income
`Tax
`6 Business Services
`The Business Viewpoint / A Case Study in Health Care /
`Add-On Services / Facsimile / The Technical Angle / Teletext/
`Teleconferencing
`7 Whitbread
`The Whitbread Structure / A Crucial Problem / Developing an
`Interactive Management-Information System / Management
`Reaction / The Viewdatabase at Whitbread / Balancing
`Inventories / In-House Versus Public Viewdata Service / The
`Security of the Viewdatabase / The Challenge of Intelligent
`Terminals
`8 Homevision
`The Source / Viewtron / PCNET / The Next Generation of
`Television / Programmable Video Games / Merging Home and
`Office
`
`vii
`1
`
`13
`
`33
`
`SI
`
`65
`
`83
`
`97
`
`ill
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 6
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 6
`
`

`

`9. The Personal Computer
`The Size of Personal Computers / The Do-It-Yourself Kit |
`What Is a Personal Computer? / The Coming Years / Six
`Markets / Coinvolvement / Computers and Users / A Range of
`Services
`10 The Microprocessor
`Integrated Circuits / The Impact of VLSI / Miniaturization /
`The New Automobiles / Integrated Video Terminals / The
`Microprocessor and Houseplants / Portable Terminals
`11 Speak, Spell, and Videopaint
`Computer-Aided Instruction / Human Machine Communication /
`New Concepts / Let's Talk / Videography/ Superpaint / The
`Office of the Future
`'
`12 New Perspectives in Transmission and Storage
`Cable TV / Clear Signals / The Roosevelt Island Experience /
`Optical Storage / The Digital Option / Applications /
`Combining Optical Discs with Intelligent Copiers
`13 Software
`The Software Challenge / BASIC,Pascal, and Other Languages/
`Don’t Rush / Interactive Software / Software for Home,
`Education, and Entertainment/ Programming Products
`14 Marketing
`Selecting a Personal Computer / Computer Shops / The
`Economics of Distribution / Franchising / Learning from
`Experience / The Industry Giants / Selling to Small Businesses /
`Contracting for a Personal Computer
`15 Maintainability
`Reliability Statistics / Preventive Maintenance / Maintenance
`Policies / Telediagnostics / Network Assistance / Software
`Rehability / Software Diagnostics / A Maintenance Strategy
`16 Know-How
`The Age of Datavision / The Knowledge Worker / Human
`Resources / The Information Needs of Society / A Learning
`Curve / Real Issues in Personal Computers / Machines Create
`Progress and Jobs
`Glossary
`Index
`
`123
`
`139
`
`153
`
`171
`
`185
`
`201
`
`213
`
`227
`
`237
`259
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 7
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 7
`
`

`

`
`
`Preface
`
`The domesticated computeris a product of technology. Technolo-
`gy is the art of doing things using objects that are not part of the
`human body,
`There was a time in history when humansdid not use technology,
`when they did not make tools out of rock, bone, wood, or metals,
`What drove humansto develop technology was the realization that,
`by adapting the materials in the world for specific purposes, they
`could make themselves more comfortable.
`Putting technology to use involves change, and change upsets the
`way people have been accustomed to doing things—for decades
`and even for generations. Because change is rapid and our exposure
`to it is high, we must change our personallives, as well as the places
`where we work. If we do not, we will not be able to industriilize
`the services now possible through technological advancement; nor
`will we be able to benefit from them, To assure the proper man-
`agement of change, we must close the communications gap.
`Computerspecialists, TV designers, and telephone transmission
`experts, for example, are not always aware of the social impact of
`the devices they invent. They know a lot about microprocessors,
`cathode-ray tubes, switching, and transmission lines. But they
`don’t necessarily understand consumersensitivity. This explains
`why they are sometimes unresponsive to the requirements of the
`average person,
`A similar statement can be made about the consumer’s know-
`how in terms of computers and communications. Yet computer-
`based communication has become the veins and arteries of social
`life. Just as the human body cannot function with clogged veins
`and arteries, neither can large organizations and individual house-
`holds operate with clogged communications channels. This has
`Vii
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 8
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 8
`
`

`

`long been true of technology. Technology can be user-friendly.
`Computers are no cold neighbors, as conventional wisdom some-
`times suggests.
`Computers and communications are both the agents and the
`wheels of change. We know from experience that the more diverse
`technology’s components are, the greater the information exchange
`needed to master them, In this sense, /nferactive Videotex fills a
`private and an organizational need. By providing visual communi-
`cation between people and information, it broadens out horizon.
`Users may be divided into two broad categories. The first is the
`internal business environment in which Viewdata serves informa-
`tion purposes. Applications range from telephone directories to
`sales prices, stock levels, parts lists, expedited items, accounts re-
`ceivable, claims, and executives’ diary appointments. Many poten-
`tial user companies already have a computer. Why then, should
`they wish to buy Viewdata as well? The main reasonis that View-
`data is designed to be much cheaper than most other computer
`systems. Andit is a general-purpose, relatively low-cost, packaged
`service with terminals that support color,
`Easy access and immediate response have their impact. During a
`four-month trial period in 1978-79—as basic computing service, an
`information provider
`reported—its pages were viewed 110,172
`times by users. No wonder that by late March 1979, one month
`after the introduction of Viewdata in England, there had been
`4,000 inquiries from parties interested in being connected to the
`service,
`Both business and the homeuser can benefit from Viewdata. OF
`these two groups, surely the more far-reaching is that of the home
`user. The home user can communicate directly with the computer
`storing the information, as well as interrogate and get realtime
`answers. It is possible for a user to make a direct purchase simply
`by supplying a credit card numberin responseto an advertisement,
`Viewdata can also be used to send bank statements to clients of
`banks whoare participating in the system.
`This technology is a new experience. As such, it has a lot of
`appeal. It’s an experience that could change our way of looking at
`just about everything. The private user with a personal computer
`can attach a machine to the system and communicate with data-
`bases. This user can send and receive electronic mail and do office
`Vili
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 9
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 9
`
`

`

`work by remote control. With all this, it is hard to resist the con-
`clusion that Viewdata will have a major effect on society.
`Information exchange makes people more aware of things and
`sets the pace of development. Computers handle information, and
`information means knowledge; knowledgeis power. Computersalso
`mean automation—from transaction-processing to decision-making.
`The expansion of technology hasblurred the distinction between
`the haves and the have-nots. By bringing people closer together,
`computers and communications erase the argument
`that 90%
`of science and technology has been developed for the rich. Tech-
`nology has turned the computer into a relatively simple inexpen-
`sive, and easy-to-use tool for everyone, and we should be ready
`for the coming changes.
`
`Let me close by expressing my thanks to everybody who contribu-
`ted to making this book successful: from my colleagues, for their
`advice, to the organizations I visited in my research, for their in-
`sight; and to Eva-Maria Binder for the drawings, typing, and index.
`
`Dimitris N. Chorafas
`January 198]
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 10
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 10
`
`

`

`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 11
`
` 1
`
`Technology
`
`The first wave of evolutionary progress came when early humans
`abandoned caves to live in communities. This led to the agricultur-
`al revolution—the systematization of food production. The second
`wave was the industrial revolution, in which the rules of work were
`standardized and life in general became morerigid.
`1980, with communications spread around the globe, affecting
`everyone’s life to some extent, computers are ready to expand the
`human experience. With semiconductor capabilities incorporated
`in practically every electronic product, a new era has begun.
`A movement is under way, however, to break up this central-
`ized, rigid system of control. The aftermath could be immense:
`change may be accelerated many times over, and society will most
`likely becomeincreasingly complex.
`Speculation is mounting about many of the issues involved. The
`Age of Information, according to one school of thought, may raise
`personal income to a level 20 times that of the present level. Some
`experts predict a fiftyfold increase by the end of this century.
`Computers and communications are the crucial part of this change.
`For more than 25 years information machines were keptin offices
`and factories, Now they are swiftly being moved into homes.
`The domesticated computer center of the future will consist of
`microprocessors running a variety of equipment from “‘whiteware”
`(refrigerators, ovens, washing machines) to video units, telephone
`stations, and digital terminals, Domesticated data-handling units
`may cost, at the start, between $1,000 and $2,000. But the cost
`will diminish even if the needed memory capacity increases be-
`cause of expanding use.
`Domestication is the issue. As human beings, we have always
`tried to domesticate our surroundings, We have used zoomorphic
`
`(1)
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 11
`
`

`

`(2)
`
`Interactive Videotex
`
`to make it more
`approaches to humanize the world around us,
`familiar and less formidable, more comfortable for people.
`Humanizing means endowing inanimate things with a meaning
`beyond their connotations. Humanization is essential in establish-
`ing a habitat relationship among people, their environment, and
`their machines. And just because it is man-made, “humanization,”
`under scrutiny, reveals some of the mystifying foundations of the
`mind, such as the need to reach for data and communicate them.
`The advantages of computers and communications in the house-
`hold range from the immediacy of information to the effective use
`of the other products of technology. By “immediacy” I mean access
`to a vast, updated database and the possibility of enlarging online
`capabilities by coupling a home computerto a telephone network.
`A database is an organized, computer-run, orderly collection of
`data designed in an application-independent mannerto serve data-
`processing purposes. In Chapter 4 we discuss the componentparts
`of the database as information elements, as things known or
`assumed, facts or figures from which conclusions can be drawn,
`information, quantities that have been measured and recorded,
`digital communications.
`Mail is one of the oldest forms of communication, As we will
`see in this book,all-electronic mail can both eliminate time delays
`and cut costs by reducing long-distance telephone charges. Products
`now under developmentwill offer capabilities in graphics, includ-
`ing limited-movementtelevision. Nevertheless, some people object
`to the computer as an “intelligent” machine. Machines, however,
`are neither intrinsically bad nor intrinsically good. As is true of
`any tool, what computers do depends on the people who use them.
`Computers haye no regard for motive or intent, good orevil. This
`is also true of science in general.
`The difficulty in domesticating the computerlies in the human
`interaction, where much depends on motivation. As information
`specialists, computer scientists have not done their share in moti-
`vating users in bringing them into the picture,in demystifying and
`knocking down the barriers between people and machines. If past
`history is any guide, the bringing together of people and computers
`is at hand. To appreciate what is in store for everyone in this in-
`formation explosion, we must look at the long march of civiliza-
`tion, at how and when we acquired what we have.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 12
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 12
`
`

`

`Technology
`
`(3)
`
`Early Discoveries
`
`Throughout history people have made important technological
`advances, only to discover that the consequences of their advances
`were not confined to the immediate effects. The first technological
`breakthrough—fire—influenced human development
`far beyond
`the expectations of early humans. Fire, and thus technology, al-
`lowed people to control their environment and tailor it to their
`needs. Metallurgy became possible only after humans learned to
`control fire. But metallurgy was developed thousands of years
`after fire was domesticated. (There is always a delay between a
`great discovery and its productive application.)
`Another result of the mastery of fire was the discovery that food
`heated by fire tastes better and becomeseasier to chew and there-
`fore digest. As cooked food yielded pleasant new flavors, it became
`universally appreciated—a good example of the broadening effect
`of a crucial technological advance, the implications of which usu-
`ally are not at first known.
`Throughout history people have learned that technological de-
`yelopments do not produce only beneficial results; they expose
`people to danger. Campfires sometimes destroyed the shelters they
`were intended to heat and light. People died in fires. And fire has
`often been used as a weapon to kill others. Even a fire carefully
`used may have undesirable side effects. Smoke fouls the air and
`irritates the throat and lungs. Should we, therefore, abandon the
`use of fire? Endure the pollution? Or should we devise a way of
`using fire without some orall of these side effects?
`Far from being an academic curiosity, technology and its effect
`should be of intense interest to everyone. Throughout recorded
`history, technology has had an immense impact on people.
`Technology creates opportunities. But because of its scope and
`the immensity of its impact, it’s like Gulliver in the land of the
`Lilliputians: every step ought to be studied thoughtfully. Not only
`scientists but the average citizen should understand the breadth of
`change involved in science and technology, and they should pre-
`pare for this change.
`It is entirely likely that in the computerized society of the fu-
`ture, thos¢ who are unwilling or unable to use computers will be
`excluded from work positions of power. Also, because the com-
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 13
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 13
`
`

`

`(4)
`
`Interactive Videotex
`
`puterized society will be leisure-oriented, this exclusion will mean
`that, as usual, the brighter people will work, andit will be they who
`will struggle for that power. What will happen to those who areless
`bright? They will probably have the time free to enjoy themselves,
`since there will be no work for them to do. The computer-based
`society of the year 2000 may contain a privileged class of “infor-
`mation providers,” on oneside, and, on the other, everybodyelse.
`People make history, and people makescience. But scienceis a
`peculiar creature. It is amoral; it has no morals or politics. It is
`neutral, neither good or bad. The goal of science is efficiency, in
`the pursuit of which friends and foes alike will be eliminated if
`necessary.
`Scientific discovery brings new processes, and new processes
`result in new ideas that upset the existing order, Because of these
`processes and ideas, and the pace at which they develop, the per-
`son whois last today, but who nevertheless tries, may be first
`tomorrow,
`All this must be considered in discussing the impact—social and
`economic—of the new scientific ideas and Processes that occur.
`The agents of change do not always answer the curse of modern
`times: gigantism. The most intriguing agent of change in the short
`term may very well be the microprocessor.
`
`The Next Vital Steps
`
`With every important technological advance, we face a challenge.
`Weknowail too well that once we have reached a certain level of
`development, any retreat meansa significant reduction of capabili-
`ties, as well as a lowering of the general standard of living, a reduc-
`tion society will allow only reluctantly.
`:
`There is enough historical evidence to documentthis view, Look
`at the next great technological advance after the domestication of
`fire: agriculture. The systematic cultivation of crops began about
`12,000 years ago in Egypt and Mesopotamia, and agriculture has
`been in use ever since.
`Agriculture has had a profound impact oncivilization. Its de-
`velopment led to farming communities—thefirst organized human
`societies. It also meantthat, for the first time, a group of people
`could produce more food than was needed for subsistence.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 14
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 14
`
`

`

`Technology
`
`(5)
`
`Artisans, and then merchants, poets, and artists, could now exist.
`Later came thinkers, doctors, and scientists. The life of the mind
`began, not because people discovered that
`they needed an intel-
`lectual life but because the domestication of agriculture made pos-
`sible professions other than the original one of cultivating crops.
`The third great development was that of communication. Com-
`munication began with speech and was formalized when writing
`was invented. Through the development of language, then writing,
`and eventually printing, mankind moved out of its ancient ignor-
`ance, opening the way for science. Science actually consists of
`doing experiments and publishing the knowledge gained from them.
`Otherwise, science would not be disciplined human action but
`merely a hobby.
`Speech and the methods for recording it have made a significant
`difference between humans and the lower animals. As long as direct
`speech was the sole means of human communication, however,
`communication was limited to an individual’s hearing range. Writing
`changed this perspective. It was now possible to communicate
`without fear of distortion. Speech makes us human; writing makes
`us think.
`Speech allowed experiences to be passed on. Writing made the
`experience cumulative. Both facts and vision could be recorded,
`on which new generations could build. Communication became
`synonymous with intelligence, Writing now permitted the transfer
`of abstract information among human beings. With writing, the
`process of communication accelerated. Knowledge could not only
`be stored but improved upon.
`
`Quantification
`
`With the thirst for expression satisfied, people needed a system of
`signs and rules with which to record and transfer data, as well as
`experiment with their thoughts.
`Through mathematics, people’s ability to calculate and think
`logically improved. Positional notation opened the gates in arith-
`metic. The discovery of the zero—making something out of nothing
`and giving it a name—ranks with the domestication of fire, speech,
`and writing as the mostsignificant stepsin civilization.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 15
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 15
`
`

`

`(6)
`
`Interactive Videotex
`
`The next big step was printing, including the development of
`paper,
`ink, and metal alloys. The earliest storage media was clay,
`stone scrolls, or papymis. With printing, mankind advanced to the
`stage of making multiple copies.
`If agriculture made possible the first human communitylarger
`than the family, printing made possible the first community that
`included thinkers. A rapid scientific and technological advancere-
`sulted. The 16th-century revolution of thought became possible
`only after the establishment of printing on the continent of Europe.
`The transmission of messages was for centuries limited by the
`physical problem of transporting them. Information sometimes
`had to be carried great distances by people on foot or on horse-
`back. The steam engine, as it was applied in locomotives and steam-
`ships, sped the carrying of messages relatively little. Then came
`a genuine breakthrough: electricity.
`
`Communications
`
`The world began to be wired for the transmission of messages and
`their reception about the middle of the 19th century. By 1866,
`cables stretched across the Atlantic, enabling the Old World to
`communicate with the New World in terms of seconds rather than
`the weeks or months of the era of slow-moving ships, trains, and
`horses. Communications was the first great area whereelectricity
`wasput to use. It all started with Michael Faraday’s dynamo (1831)
`and Samuel F. B. Morse’s telegraph (1835). In 1858 came the
`steam-driven electric generator, and during the 1870s Thomas A.
`Edison invented the incandescent light bulb and the phonograph
`and Alexander Graham Bell the telephone.
`The era in which the breakthroughin electronic communications
`occurred started in 1887 when Heinrich Hertz learned to produce
`and detect radio waves. By 1901, Guglielmo Marconi was using
`them to send messages across the Atlantic. Radio made it possible
`to transmit wireless messages,
`thus creating the potential for a
`greatly simplified and expanded communications network,
`By the mid-1890s, scientists had learned that electric current
`involves particles smaller than the atom. In 1897, J. J. Thomson
`discovered the electron. Under the proper conditions a stream of
`electrons sent through a vacuum can be deflected, started, stopped,
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 16
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 16
`
`

`

`Techitology
`
`(7)
`
`diminished, and intensified. Operations once requiring mechanical
`switches could now be performed by manipulating electrons in a
`vacuum. Because electronsare so lightweight, this could be accom-
`plished with much greater speed, precision, and saving of energy.
`Development of an electronic switch by scientists such as John A,
`Fleming and Lee De Forest led to the development of the radio
`tube, which made possible a host of electronic instruments, not
`only for radio but for television and Datavision.
`Satellites have opened another frontier in communications. In
`1965 Early Bird, the first commercial communicationssatellite,
`was launched. Weighing 88 pounds, it had a capacity of 240 voice
`circuits and one television channel.
`In 1971 Jntelsat JV was
`launched, It weighed nearly a ton and had a capacity of 6,000
`voice circuits and 12 television channels. Today the Jntelsat sys-
`tem has seven satellites in orbit and is used by means of 115 termi-
`nals on earth in 65 nations. The worldwide investment in this
`system and others like it is well over $1 billion.
`Communications via satellites continue to cost less every year
`despite inflation. In 1979 the International Telecommunications
`Satellite Organization (Intelsat) credited improved technology and
`the efficiency of its network ofsatellites when it cut its monthly
`charge by 16% for a full-time,
`two-way telephone circuit. (The
`new price is $960. When Early Bird was launched in 1965, the
`same service cost $533. If the charge had risen at the samerate as
`inflation, the cost in 1980 would be more than $2,000.) Because
`of technology, the United States benefits from a 10% to 12% annual
`reduction in communications costs, a reduction of about 24% per
`year in computer logic and a decrease of 30% to 40% in computer
`memory. This makes an average decrease per year of 20%. Mean-
`while, personnel costs are increasing about 9% annually in real
`terms (Figure 1.1).
`Although communications costs are dropping, so is the price of
`memory devices. The ratio of the former to the latter is roughly
`1:3.5. This suggests that we would be well advised, both in the
`homeand theoffice, to substitute cheap memory for the more ex-
`pensive lines. That’s what Viewdata proposes to do. Such ad-
`vances, it should be noted, come none too soon. Communications
`costs in business and industry are high and getting higher all the
`time, whereas, as Figure 1.2 indicates, both unit costs and packap-
`ing are increasingly attractive to users.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 17
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 17
`
`

`

`(8)
`
`Interactive Videotex
`
`COST
`
`|
`
`
`
`PERSONNEL +9%/YEAR
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`10 - 12%/YEAR
`COMPUTER LOGIC
`me 25Yo/YEAR
`
`PUTER MEMORY
`SOMOARMOR
`TIME
`
`$UNIT SSS
`.
`TIME, USE —»
`
`
`
`FACKAGING
`
`SIZE a
`
`iee
`VLS| , TIME —>
`
`Inventions
`
`In terms of functions, we are talking about network systems. In
`computer handling, office processing, home usage, even voice com-
`munications, we are moving towardall-digital service. One network
`will be able to handle all needs, be they voice, image, or data,
`whether they are destined for the factory, thesales office, general
`management, or the home and inventions are needed to make
`this true.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 18
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 18
`
`

`

`Technology
`
`(9)
`
`About 18,000 patents have been issued to Bell Laboratories dur-
`ing its 50 years of existence. That is more than one patent per day.
`Among them are coaxial cable transmission, microwave radio relay,
`the modem (data set), the transistor, the laser, direct distance dial-
`ing, electronic switching, the picturephone, the commerical exploi-
`tation of domesticated radio transmission, the first synchronous
`sound motion picture system, the pioneeringelectrical relay digital
`computer, and the negative feedback amplifier.
`Besides making possible transcontinental telephone transmission,
`for which the negative amplifier was developed, it paved the way
`for high-fidelity recording and basic computer circuitry. This is
`another example of theinitially unknowneffects of technological
`innovation. Recall that, in the past, as each scientific breakthrough
`became knownto the general public, the new technology vastly ex-
`ceeded people’s ability to deal with it productively. As technology
`moves faster and faster, the gap grows between those who know
`about a particular development and those who do not.
`
`The Economy of Mass
`
`Evolving communications facilities have opened a new industry
`standard:
`the economy of mass. Delivering a message from, say,
`Paris to Chicago by hand is much cheaper than constructingatele-
`phone system. Nobody, however, thought of building a network
`for transmitting just one message. The investment will be made if
`it can be justified.
`Once communication by wire becameavailable, people discover-
`ed that they had a great deal to say and a great deal to hear. If
`few long-distance messages were transmitted before the era of elec-
`tronic communication, it wasn’t because there was nothing to say
`but because of the time, effort, and cost of delivery involved.
`Computers and communications are fast becoming the basis of
`the economy of mass (Figure 1.3). Although computers andelec-
`tronic communication have not followed parallel courses, they have
`been integrated into the field of data communications.
`Data communications over the analog voice network available
`at the time began in the 1950s, At the time the U.S, government
`needed a way to transmit aircraft radar data to central locations.
`Commercial data communications service began around 1960, ini-
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 19
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 19
`
`

`

`(10)
`
`Interactive Videotex
`
`awe
`CENTRAL INFORMATION
`SYSTEM
`EQUIPMENT
`e
`
`DISTRIBUTED
`COMPUTER
`POWER
`
`
`DIS
`
`STAND-ALONE; ONLINE
`
`OFFICE
`AUTOMATION
`
`COMMUNICATIONS.
`NETWORK
`
`
`
`
`MEDIA PERSONAL AND HOME
`
`PERSONAL COMPUTER POWER
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`
`
`COMPUTERS AND
`
`tially with speeds ranging from about 100 to 2,400 bits per second
`(BPS) (a bit is a binary digit; for explanations of this and other
`technical terms, consult the Glossary). (Telex operates at about 70
`BPS and a modern voice-grade line at 2,400 BPS; the average and
`most common voice line operates at 1,200 BPS.)
`In the late 1950s data transmission service wasstill slow; 600
`BPS wastypical. By 1960, however, reliable transmission at speeds
`up to 1,200 BPS had beenestablished. Although the signal format
`(start/stop, or asynchronous) was not very efficient,
`it was the
`easiest format to implement, andisstill in use.
`Weoftenfail to appreciate the impact ofdigital communications
`on the advancement of technology and the shaping of society in
`general. Yet this technological advance has been of fundamental
`and far-reaching importance. In the 19th century the new modes
`of transportation—roads, canals, and railways—made possible the
`acceleration of the industrial revolution, which led to a more in-
`dustrialized society. In the 1970s we saw the forging of digital-
`communications links and the bitth of a technology that promises
`to have a greater impact than 19th-century industrialization.
`The computer itself has changed—in its structure, design, and
`capabilities—because of the needs of the communications industry.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 20
`
`PMC Exhibit 2124
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 20
`
`

`

`Technology
`
`(11)
`
`Goneis the time when batch processing was king. Today we speak
`of queries, on-line access, interactivity. This is where the main tech-
`nical effort of the 1980s will be. Soon the history of the computer
`will be divided into four “epochs”—the paleolithic, the neolithic,
`the copper, andthe iron, to use the metaphors of geology.
`The paleolithic epoch started with the commercialization of com-
`puter power around 1950. Computer mainframes were the dino-
`saurs of this epoch. They dominated the field for some 15 years,
`Univac I opened the market, and IBM conquered it, eventually
`gaining 60% to 65% of the world market.
`In the neolithic epoch, smaller, more flexible and efficient com-
`puters with greater capacity were designed that made the main-
`frames of the paleolithic epoch extinct. By 1965 the age of the
`minicomputer had begun. The age opened with the launching of
`Digital Equipment'’s PDP-8. Until
`the management of the giant
`companies got wind of what was happening,little Digital Equip-
`ment had a large portion of the worldwide market.
`By the early 1970s information technology had entered the cop-
`per epoch. The microprocessor came along, soon to be upgraded to
`the microcomputer—all accompanied by a host of peripheral prod-
`ucts. Intel’s standard microprocessor of 1972 will one day be re-
`garded as the turning point in the developmentof computing power,
`The trend toward making the computer available to the public
`started here, although it would be another 10 years before the
`practical results

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket