throbber
= =
`
`
`it 2113 PMC Exh
`
`
`
`Fe
`
`Apple v
`IPR2016
`
`. PMC
`01520
`Page 1
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1
`
`
`

`

`i i
`
`@ Online 1980
`
`ISBN 0 903796 52 X
`
`No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
`or transmitted in any form, by any means, electronic, mechanical,
`photocopying I microfilming I recording or otherwise 1 without written
`permission from the Publishers.
`
`Published by Online Publications Ltd. 1 Northwood Hills 1 Middx.
`
`Printed by The Chameleon Press Ltd. 1 London
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 2
`
`

`

`399
`
`The use of MicroCobol for Telesoftware
`
`E. C. Sedman
`Viewdata Manager
`CAP- CPP Micro Products Ltd
`
`England
`
`The concept of Telesoftware is described with particular
`reference to its implementation using MicroCobol - a
`machine invariant programming language developed by
`CAP-CPP.
`
`Examples are given both of the use of on-line programs
`as an enhancement to the standard viewdata facilities, and
`also examples of the types of program that could be
`distributed by telesoftware but run in "stand alone 11 mode .
`
`I
`· I
`
`I
`'l
`i
`••
`'-
`.:
`·I
`
`" l
`l;
`
`n .·,
`
`. \
`
`':I
`
`;·_I'
`,,:f
`
`fl '!.'
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 3
`
`

`

`400
`
`1.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The Concept of Telesoftware
`When viewdata was invented a few years ago, no-one could fore(cid:173)
`see how rapidly microelectronics was going to develop. The
`result has been that except for a few of the very earliest sets,
`all viewdata receivers are built around a set of chips, rather
`than discrete logic circuits. Some of these chips are in fact
`general-purpose, programmable, microprocessors. The pressure
`is still very strong to minimise the number of components, and
`hence the cost, for the mass market domestic sets, but the
`marginal cost of providing additional capabilities is not high, and
`a number of "intelligent 11 sets are now being developed.
`
`Su.ch intelligent viewdata receivers give the capability to carry
`out more complex operations than are available with a standard
`terminal. For example, it is possible to process the data that
`is received, rather than just to display it, and it is also possHie
`to reprogram the device to perform different functions.
`
`Now a reprogrammable device requtres a means of getting the
`programs into it. But with viewdata we are talking about a
`terminal connected to the telephone network. So why don't we
`use the network itself to distribute, :not just data, but also the
`programs (software). This is the principle of telesoftware: the
`distribution of software via a communication medium, in this
`case the telephone.
`
`But telesoftware is not just an interesting technical idea: there
`is also a need for it. As the cost of hardware has been coming
`down rapidly there has not been a corresponding fall. in the
`cost of developing and maintaining software, which remains
`labour intensive and therefore increases with inflation. However,
`there is an alternative way to reduce the selling price, and thi~:>
`is to sell many copies of the same software. The ideal way to
`achieve this is to have a means of distribution whereby the
`software supplier can set up a single copy of a program which
`is updated when necessary. Purchasers can take copies paying
`a usage charge each time they do so. This is precisely the
`facility that telesoftware can provide.
`
`Compatibili_!x
`With the standard Pre§tel system, it is already possible to
`purchase terminals from many different suppliers, but all
`displaying information in the same way. When we come to ]YJge-
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 4
`
`

`

`401
`
`software we again want to achieve the same results, i.e. we
`want to have a single version of a program, stored on Pres tel,
`and capable of being brought down and executed in a range of
`different terminals.
`
`This is an extremely difficult problem to solve. Even with
`standard terminals, characters look different depending on the
`display chips used, and there is at least one inconsistency in
`interpretation of control characters (see Prestel pages 33822 and
`3382262 ). With software there is much greater scope for in(cid:173)
`consistency because the basic instructions are different between
`different processors.
`
`The problem has been solved completely in the implementation
`of MicroCobol, which is a programming language designed to be
`portable over a wide range of machines. Programs are compils::l
`to an intermediate code which is then interpreted identically on
`different processors. Even more significantly, the same result is
`obtai ned from a program which is in error, so it does not
`matter what machine is used to test out the program, the effect
`is always the same.
`
`Micro Cobol
`The MicroCobol languagJ has been designed specifically for
`business applications on microcomputers. Some of its features
`are:-
`
`the most commonly used language
`Based on COBOL,
`for business data processing, but modified to make it
`suitable for interactive use on small machines (rather
`than batch mainframe operations) and also extended to
`include modern structured prog~amming constructs. It
`is a language designed for professional programmers
`(unlike BASIC for example) but there is a large
`population of such programmers capable of using it
`with minimal retraining.
`
`Micro Cobol incorporates a powerful disk- based operating
`system with extensive file handling capabilities.
`It
`requires at least one and preferably two disks,
`the
`minimum being floppy disks of quarter megabyte capacity.
`Minimum. memory is 48K, but 64K is an advantage.
`
`Thus MicroCobol is suitable for an intelligent business viewdata
`terminal, rather than the lowest cost device for the domestic
`
`I
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 5
`
`

`

`402
`
`user. As a very rough figure, we would expect the cost of such
`a terminal to be about twice the cost of a high quality standard
`viewdata terminal, if produced in similar numbers. The early
`users are therefore expected to be large business organisations
`with a need for distributed computing power, but it is expected
`to spread to smaller businesses, and eventually to very small
`businesses such as the corner shop.
`
`2.
`
`THE MECHANISM OF TELESOFTW ARE
`
`Data Format
`A::, a starting point for our telesoftware development work we
`assumed that we could operate with no changes at all to the
`central software of Prestel. Although it was not by any means
`certain that this would be a valid assumption, it has proved to
`be so. Obviously, there would have been problems and delays
`if we had needed changes at the centre, but a more important
`point is the fact that our telesoftware will now work on any
`viewdata system which uses protocols similar to Prestel. Hence,
`our marketplace includes private as well as public viewdata
`systems.
`
`Prestel works on 7 data bits pll,1s parity which is probably the
`least convenient format for a compu'ter language based on an
`· eight bit byte. For simplicity our initial work was based on
`transmitting a pair of hexadecimal characters for each byte of
`program (i.e. using only 4 bits per character. } This gave a
`maximum of about 410 bytes per frame after allowing for control
`information. Further developments have achieved greater packing
`densities by recognising multiple repetitions of the same
`character, and -by allowing most ascii characters to be trans(cid:173)
`mitted as a single 7 bit character.
`
`Another serious deficier:cy of Prestel from this point of view is
`the lack of an "end of transmission" character, but this is
`overcome by having our own "end" sequence.
`
`The length of the. transmission at 960 characters is .longer than
`would normally be expected, so we allowed for shorter units.
`However, the overhead is minimised with longer !Ire cords rr, and
`we find the full length to be satisfactory from the point of view
`of error frequency, so this is what we use.
`
`Error Detection
`Unlike telesoftware broadcast by teletext, we can take a very
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 6
`
`

`

`403
`
`simplistic approach to errors. Because of teletext's delays be(cid:173)
`tween successive transmission~, they make every effort to
`correct transmission errors, by the use of Hamming codes. We
`simply detect errors, and request retransmission of the frame
`in error. Checking consists of the parity check on each charac(cid:173)
`ter, a checksum on the line of control information on each
`frame, a checksum on the data characters on each frame, and
`an overall checksum for the entire program, to ensure that we
`have not got out of step in reading the frames.
`
`We considered the desirability of a more complex cyclic re(cid:173)
`dundancy check, but came to the conclusion that the error rate
`at which the simple checksum is inadequate, is such that the
`time taken to transmit a program would be unacceptably long
`due to the number of retransmission:; needed. In practice we see
`very few errors in transmission; remember that we are always
`using a local call. The program tries each frame up to three
`times, and if the error persists the operator is given the choice
`of trying again or abandoning the run.
`
`Anti Piracy Protection
`If companies are going to invest in the development of programs
`and supply them via public viewdata services, they need protect(cid:173)
`ion against unauthorised copying of the programs. The first
`level of protection with MicroCobol arises from the fact that
`programs are distributed not in source form, but in a verion
`of the intermediate code. Some languages, such as Basic, are
`normally saved in source form, or in an intermediate language
`which is very similar to the source. In these cases it would be
`very easy for a customer to copy down the frames containing
`the program, and manipulate them to produce his own version.
`In fact he could even view the frames ·and simply rekey them if
`that were easier.
`
`Whi~e we cannot, of course, protect programs completely
`against the equivalent of the dedicated "phone freak", we can
`ensure that a significant amount of time and effort would be
`required to break the codes that we insert. And in the business
`environment to which MicroCobol programs are addressed, time
`is money. We have therefore included a riumber of complicating
`factors, one of which is an expiry date.
`
`The program provider specifies a retention period which is
`stored on the first frame of the program. It can be unspecified,
`in which case the program is available indefinitely. Otherwise
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 7
`
`

`

`404
`
`the operating system adds the retention period to the current
`date, and sets up an expiry date. Any attempt to run the
`program after the expiry date will fail with an appropriate
`message.
`
`As a further extension one of the frames could be a response
`frame. The date and time provided by Prestel give a unique
`identifier for the program, and the response frame identifies
`the purchaser. So if a
`''pirate If copy turns up its origin can be
`traced.
`
`Practical Use
`The telesoftware mechanism is in fact a general file transfer
`mechanism. Not just programs, but also data files can be
`transferred in the same way. Successive frames are used,
`called down by sending .#:. and if more than 26 are required,
`route 0 from the z frame gives the first frame of another page.
`
`From the user's point of view, he finds the program he wants
`via the normal menu selection process. The instructions on how
`to operate the program are also on Prestel, routed to in the
`normal way. Charging is via the normal Prestel frame charge,
`specified by the program provider, and collected on the user 1 s
`bill in the same way as all his other information charges.
`
`The major restriction that we can see on telesoftware is its
`speed. Assuming we can completely overlap the reading of a
`frame with the processing of the preceding one,
`the transfer
`rate is about 8 seconds per frame, i.e. ?t frames per minute.
`Depending on the packing density we can achieve this is likely
`to give up to about 4K bytes per minute,· i.e. 5 minutes for a
`typical program of 20K bytes. This should be acceptable, but if
`we want to transfer a suite of programs, say the sales ledger
`occupying about a quarter of a million bytes, the time taken
`will not be less than an hour.
`
`While it would be .possible to bring down a suite of programs
`of this size during lunch, say, it does not seem very practicatie.
`Until we have significantly faster transmission speeds, we there(cid:173)
`fore believe that telesoftware will be used only for individual
`programs and for amendments and updates to suites of programs,
`which will continue to be purchased initially by some other
`means, for example a floppy disk sent by the post. However,
`we envisage that the use of response frames, and in the future
`a message service, will play an important part in the remote
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 8
`
`

`

`405
`
`support and maintenance of software~
`
`3.
`
`EXTENSIONS TO VIEWDATA
`
`So far we have only considered the means by which telesoftware
`operates. But what can we do with it?
`
`Having brought down a program we can go off-line~ and treat
`the terminal as a completely stand-alone machine. However~ let
`us consider first some of the possible applications of the
`intelligent terminal when on-line to the viewdata centre, :::>o that
`it is used in effect to extend the viewdata capabilities.
`
`Improved Access Methods
`With Prestel, the standard method of accessing data is via a
`series of menu selections. The simplicity of this approach and
`the ease with which it can be learnt and used is probably the
`greatest strength of the viewdata concept. However,· it does
`mean that there can often be a large number of accesses
`before getting to the desired frame. This can be seen as a
`clear weakness of the system, which will be particularly
`serious for someone who needs to use the system frequently.
`
`It is also possible to go directly to a specific page, but of
`course it is necessary to know in advance the· page number for
`the information required. This knowledge can be achieved by an
`intelligent terminal which makes use of an index; for example,
`to select a railway timetable given the starting point and
`destination.
`
`The idea is that the index will be stored on Prestel by the IP to
`whose information it refers. Thus it will be kept up-to-date and
`called down only when needed. Alternatively, the index could be
`brought down onto local disk storage if required frequently. In
`this latter case it would be necessary to provide a means of
`checking to ensure that the index on disk had not got out of
`date and out of step with the data.
`
`Although the simplest approach is to obtain and display a com(cid:173)
`plete frame of data, it is possible to be more selective, only
`displaying a particular part of the data; for example a specific
`train time.
`
`The problem with the use of keywords etc is that their intra(cid:173)
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 9
`
`

`

`406
`
`duction removes some of the simplicity of the original idea. It
`is very important not to introduce the complexities of an
`elaborate data base system with its own special language. The
`preferred approach is to have a number of simple retrieval
`programs, each specific to a particular requirement. If the
`user requires access to data not covered in this way, he can
`always use the standard "menu'' approach. Thus we can add to
`the viewdata capabilities without undue complication and without
`removing existing facilities.
`
`Processing of Data
`Having retrieved data from Prestel as indicated above, it is a
`straightforward extension to want to process that data. Obviously
`this
`is easier if the information is displayed in a fixed format,
`as the program will then know exactly where to find a particular
`item. It is, however, also possible to scan the information
`looking for a particular key, and so find an item of data from
`a relatively free-format frame.
`
`Much of the data that is already on Prestel would be of greater
`value if it were possible to perform calculations directly on it.
`For example, it would be possible to calculate the current
`value of a portfolio of shares by accessing the stock exchange
`prices of each.
`
`A second use for this idea is in conjunction with closed user
`groups, using Prestel as a communication medium. For example,
`the head office could put up current price lists on Prestel for
`use by subsidiary companies or retail outlets. These latter
`could in turn use the response frame facility to send back
`orders.
`
`Input Validation
`The concept of response frames is a very" important and useful
`extension to viewdata. However, as currently implemented it
`has the serious weakness that no validity checking takes place
`on the trmessages" that are sent from the user to the IP. This
`means that if, say, alpha characters are included in what should
`be numeric data, it is only when the IP views the compJ.eted
`response frame that the error is seen.
`
`A program running in an intelligent terminal can overcome this
`problem by checking the data as it is entered, and only trans(cid:173)
`mitting valid data •.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 10
`
`

`

`A good example of this is an order entry system in which
`checks can be carried out for valid item numbers and the
`availability of stock. In addition,
`the operator has an opportunity
`to reject entries if he realises that he has made an error.
`Finally, in transmitting the response frame the terminal can
`check that the correct characters are echoed, and in the event
`of line errors can transmit the whole frame again, without
`the operator having to re-enter it.
`
`I. P. Usage
`There are already on the market a number of special purpose
`intelligent editing terminals for information providers. These·
`are programmed to perform one particular job. The big ad(cid:173)
`vantage of telesoftware is that a general purpose intelligent
`terminal can. be reprogrammed via the viewdata network to
`perform a range of different jobs. Examples include:
`*
`
`Processing Response Frames. For example, with the
`order entry system mentioned earlier the information
`provider's machine could automatically process the
`orders, producing invoices, despatch notes etc and
`update central stock levels. Note than one should try
`not to develop this idea too far: Prestel is not
`sufficiently responsive to accept orders for individual
`items such as in a seat reservation system. On lhe
`other hand, it is much better than mail order.
`
`>:<
`
`~:~
`
`>:<
`
`Updating of Frames. In the order entry example it
`would be possible to update Prestel automatically
`to indicate changes in stock availability.
`
`Processing of Frame Information. It is possible to
`interrogate frames automaticaliy on a regular basis,
`to check the counts of the number of times accessed.
`
`Editing. Off-line editing facilities can be provided,
`either in a general way, or specific to a particular
`I. P. 's requirements.
`
`So the intelligent terminal can perform a wide range of tasks
`for both the Prestel user and the information provider.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 11
`
`

`

`4.
`
`END USER COMPUTING
`
`So far we have been referring to an intelligent terminal attached
`to a viewdata network. However, by virtue of its intelligence,
`such a device is also capable of operating as a stand-alone
`machine, off-line from the network. In this mode the user is
`not paying a time based· charge, either for connection to a
`central system or for a telephone call. Instead he can run his
`own program entirely in his own time.
`
`Furthermore, because colour and graphics are available as
`standard from viewdata chip sets, we have a relatively low(cid:173)
`cost device with these features. It seems likely that colour will
`soon come to be the standard for displaying information in the
`office in the same way that colour television has taken over in
`th-e home. Thus, when combined with the distribution facilities
`of telesoftware, we have the ideal device for taking computing
`power to the end user.
`
`In this section we consider just a few of the possible business
`applications.
`
`Local Viewdata
`The development of a full private vi,ewdata system is a non(cid:173)
`trivial task if one is to handle closed user groups, response
`frames, etc, and provide full accounting facilities. On the other
`hand, a simple retrieval system using viewdata protocols can
`be implemented very easily on a microprocessor based intelligert
`terminal with a suitable file store.· And because of the great
`advantage of simplicity of use, this will be an attractive way
`to hold data.
`
`A standard, single density, floppy disk can hold about 2 00
`frames and can be carried around conveniently. It is possible
`to provide a password system for security protection but much
`greater protection is provided by the fact that the user can
`simply remove his disk and take it away with him.
`
`Because we are working with a system with a local intelligence
`we can do things that are not possible with Prestel. Firstly
`we can write directly into the display memory instead of using
`a serial link. This means that instead of taking up to eight
`seconds to fill the screen it can be done virtually instantaneousl;y.
`
`Another important feature is the ability to modify parts of the
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 12
`
`

`

`409
`
`screen, rather than displaying a whole page at a time. We can
`use this to create dynamic visuals, and, particularly in con(cid:173)
`junction with the use of colour, provide more interest ihrough
`the use of movement on the screen.
`
`Finally we can pre-program sequences of displays. In this way
`the device can be used as an aid to presentations, or to pro(cid:173)
`vide a continuous display facility.
`
`Jraining
`Computer assisted learning is an important topic in its own ·
`right. Usually it involves terminals on a mainframe computer,
`and is particularly relevant where there is a shortage of suit(cid:173)
`able teachers, or where the students need to fit: in training
`between other tasks, for example when on shift work.
`
`Prestel terminals with colour and graphics, c~m also be used,
`and with intelligent terminals used off-line,
`there is no usage
`charge. Prestel telesoftware can be used as the distribution
`medium or a private viewdata system can be used, so this will
`be particularly valuable for a company with scattered employees:
`maintenance engineers for example. And the fact that the
`program runs off-line after being brought down is an important
`psychological advantage to the slower student: it is not costing
`extra money if he takes his time. Furthermore, the intelligent
`viewdata terminal will be less expensive than most graphics
`terminals currently in use for CAL. So we are suggesting a
`very cost-effective solution.
`
`The dynamic visuals of our local viewdata system can provide
`an interesting and effective medium for putting across basic
`concepts and the menu selection technique allows for multiple
`choice questions in progress tests.
`The system keeps a count
`of the routes taken, and the teacher can subsequently analyse
`the performance of individual students, and also the effectiveness
`of the course as a whole. Standard tools have been created to
`facilitate the production of training courses by teachers without
`a knowledge of computer programming, so again the end users
`will interact directly with the terminal.
`
`Business Graphics
`The graphics capability of a viewdata terminal is not of a high
`enough quality to produce high resolution pictures, but it is very
`suitable for producing diagrams such as bar charts and histo(cid:173)
`grams, especially when use is made of the colour facilities.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 13
`
`

`

`.--(cid:173)
`'
`
`,.
`,,
`•;.
`
`410
`
`The intelligent viewdata terminal with a file store is therefore
`an excellent device for an end user to store financial information
`which he can call up and display in a format of his own choice.
`
`For example one could compare different sets of figures on the
`same graph, plotting differences or ratios,
`It is possible to
`request further details for one particular set of results that
`appears to be anomalous; for example getting monthly figures
`for a particular year. And it is also possible for the user to
`save a particular display for future reference.
`
`All this can be provided via an easy-to-use interface, so that
`the system is "user friendly". As an example of this we can
`provide a "help 11 facility whereby the user can be prompted
`w~th a choice of possible actions at any point, by pressing a
`particular key. Another example is the user's ability to select
`his own colours. since we have found· from experience that a
`choice of colours that suits one person can be found tiring by
`another.
`
`Other Uses
`Clearly there is a wide range of other possible applications for
`an intelligent terminal. The ones highlighted above have been
`examples where the special viewdata' characteristics are
`important, but as a general purpose computer there is the full
`range of business applications, which would apply both to sub(cid:173)
`sidiary branches of large companies and also to the hundreds
`of thousands of small businesses.
`
`The viewdata standard of 40 characters per line is something of
`a restriction, since most small business cc:>mputers have an 80
`character vnu. and most business applications are programmed
`accordingly. It is possible to rewrite the programs to use the
`· more restricted screen width, and we have done· that in some
`cases. However, the answer is likely to come from hardware
`advances. Coloured terminals are being developed that are
`capable of displaying either 40 or 80 characters per line. An
`intelligent version of one of these would be software switchable
`"viewdata 11 format and 80 character
`between 40 character
`"business terminal" format, in the same way that the present
`terminal is switchable between the viewdata "page-at-a-time"
`. and computer "scrolling" modes. And it would be possible to
`go further and use standard Prestel protocols for distribution
`of programs which were capable of using high resolution
`graphics.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 14
`
`

`

`411
`
`So with telesoftware there is enormous potential for further
`development of the viewdata concept. MicroCobol is specifically
`aimed at the business market, but when the cost of terminals
`becomes low enough the potential of telesoftware for the
`distribution of home entertainment and educational programs
`will be enormous. However the opportunities and problems
`associated with the development of that market are still to be
`explored.
`
`5.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`This paper has attempted to give an indication of the concept
`and possible uses of telesoftware in business applications, but
`has not been in any way an exhaustive study of the topic.
`
`It is felt that most business users of viewdata systems will
`require some degree of intelligence in their terminals, and mary
`will need some local file store. For these, telesoftware offers
`the ability to extend the capabilities of viewdata while still
`retaining the advantages of the original concept.
`
`References
`
`1.
`
`A. d'Agapeyeff 11A platform for true program portability
`with examples from MicroCobol'', Fourth International
`Conference on Software Engineering, Munich, September
`1979.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2113
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 15
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket