throbber

`
`high-resolution TV to work in produc-
`ing movies, and broadcast networks
`will use it to enhance the quality of
`standard programing.
`CBShasstill another reasonfor pro-
`moting HDTV. It and other broadcast-
`ers require transmission channels to
`get these super-fidelity pictures into
`your home. For reasons detailed be-
`low, high-resolution TV can’t be car-
`ried easily on regular TV channels—
`and no one plans to disrupt today’s
`standard TV programing based on the
`525-line NTSC (National Television
`Standards Committee) format.
`But HDTVcan be transmitted into
`homes by direct-broadcast satellite.
`CBSis tellingofficials that it’s vital to
`reserve HDTV frequencies on a new
`class of satellites slated for launch
`within a fewyears.
`
`Morepixels, better picture
`How does HDTV differ technically
`from standard TV? Standard NTSC
`sets, functioning perfectly, can dis-
`play 483 (not 525) horizontal scan
`lines created as electron beamspaint
`TV pictures by sweeping back and
`forth over picture-tube phosphors.
`Each horizontal scan line can resolve,
`or display, 436 separate picture ele-
`ments, called pixels—an NTSC pic-
`ture can display 210,588 pixels.
`In practice, new sets equipped with
`so-called comb filters [PS, Aug.
`’78]
`show only about 330 horizontal ele-
`ments; most older sets average only
`about 250 picture elements per scan
`line. By contrast, although no firm
`standards have beenset, a 1,125-line
`HDTV picture might contain not
`twice but somefive times as many pix-
`els (one million) compared with an
`ideal NTSC image. Each one of the
`high-resolution scanninglines carries
`more image detail, and each is longer
`
`becauseof the wide-screen picture for-
`mat. As a result, high-resolution TV
`requires more frequency space, or
`bandwidth—typically, 30 MHz versus
`4.2 MHz for standard NTSC TV.
`“The NTSC system has given us
`very good service during the last 25 to
`30 years,” said Flaherty, “but we are
`pressing it to its maximum aspictures
`get larger and larger.” A demonstra-
`tion made this very apparent. Two
`cameras were set up in an adjacent
`room overlooking a street. One was a
`state-of-the-art CBS camera to dis-
`play standard 525-line TV pictures.
`The other was a 1,125-line model
`madefor Japan’s public broadcasting
`corporation (NHK).
`The 525-line camera piped its pic-
`tures to a Kloss projection TV before
`us with a six-foot-diagonal screen (and
`to regular TV studio monitors). The
`NHK HDTVcamerasentits pictures
`to a Matsushita-built wide-format
`projection TV and wide-format moni-
`tors (see color pictures).
`Pictures of a bowl of fruit were
`impressive on the 525-line Kloss and
`smaller monitors. But contrasted with
`the crystal-clear images on the HDTV
`sets, the limitations of NTSC pictures
`were dramatic. Training both cam-
`eras on the street below produced even
`sharpercontrasts. I could read license
`plates and other vehicle lettering on
`HDTVsets that were a hopeless blur
`on 525-line receivers.
`Whydo today’s sets have a squarish
`picture ratio four units wide and three
`high? “It was chosen for very simple
`reasons,” said Flaherty. “First, it was
`all we could do [technologically], and
`it was the way films were made,” he
`said, describing the 1940’s mono-
`chrome-TV format.
`An HDTVsystem unveiled by Sony
`Continued
`
`108|Pop
`
`PS SPECIAL HONE
`FLECTAGIMCS
`
`High-
`resolution TV
`— here come wide-screen
`crystal-clear pictures
`
`
`
`New video components
`speed TV systems that
`match 35-mm-film fidelity
`
`By JOHN FREE
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`For several days, groups of govern-
`mentofficials, politicians, and jour-
`nalists crowded into a darkened room
`at CBS's offices here. We'd come to
`view a rare, one-timecollection of vid-
`eo gear. “What we are going to show
`you,” CBS's Joseph Flaherty, vice-
`president of engineering develop-
`ment, told my group, “is a combina-
`tion of high-resolution TV,
`stereo
`sound, wide-screen TV, and enhanced-
`color TV.”
`During the next hour I watched a
`variety. of amazing TV images that
`had extraordinary clarity—more than
`five times the detail of television pic-
`tures you see on conventional home
`receivers. The high-resolution pic-
`tures, a dazzling match for sharp-
`focus 35-mm slides, were shown on
`special “Cinerama-type” direct-view
`sets and a large-screen projection TV.
`Other equipment used by CBS, such
`as microelectronic encoding circuits
`and a Sony-built digital video record-
`er, may have a key role—in improved
`forms—in delivering this newtype of
`TV to you during the 1980's.
`Actually, so-called high-definition
`TV (HDTV) has been available for
`closed-circuit use in medical schools
`and business applications for a few
`years. But it has been limited to live
`transmissions using only cameras and
`TV monitors. Recently, professional
`videotape machinescapable of record-
`ing HDTV were unveiled. As a result,
`Hollywood directors may soon put
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2100
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 1
`
`

`

`NOVEMBER 1981 | 109
`
`Projection TV displayed by Matsushita at technology exhibit in
`Chicago this summerusesred, green, and blue projection tubes
`like conventional models, but displays high-definition 1,125-line
`images from TV camera. Screen is 55 inches diagonally.
`
`Wide-screen high-resolution monitor developed by NHK and
`Matsushita has 30-inch-diagonal screen, 5:3 aspect ratio. Phos-
`phor dots are much smaller than on conventional shadow-mask
`tubes, and NHK usesa digital beam-convergence system.
`
`PMC Exhibit 2100
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 2
`
`

`

`last spring can showpicturesin stan-
`dard 4:3 format, the extra-wide Cine-
`mascope format, or an intermediate
`picture width. The high-resolution
`sets at the CBS demonstration had a
`5:3 picture-aspect ratio. In addition to
`letting you see mostorall of the pic-
`ture from wide-screen movies, sitting
`close to sharp, wide-screen HDTV
`images conveys more of the visual
`impact of a theater screen.
`Digital demonstration
`Warmingup in another CBSoffice
`was a special type of videotape record-
`er completed by Sony just six weeks
`earlier. Bill Connolly, managing di-
`rector of development for the CBS-TV
`network, prefaced another impressive
`demonstration: “Engineers today are
`generally agreed that digital
`tech-
`niques are the proper way to record
`this HDTV information and transmit
`it,” he said [PS, March ’78].
`Connolly explained that with con-
`ventional TV, voltage is proportional
`to brightness. The brighter the scene
`at any given point on the screen, the
`higher the voltage. Since the voltage
`is analogous to what's on the screen,
`it’s called an analog system.
`“The digital system does something
`quite different,” Connolly said. The
`voltage generated by the camera is
`constantly sampled or measured by
`digital circuits. Each of these samples
`is then assigned a binary number(ze-
`ros and ones) representing its inten-
`sity. This technique for each pixel on
`the sean lines requires considerably
`more bandwidth, or frequency spec-
`trum, for storage and transmission.
`While this large-bandwidth require-
`Pouring marbles
`ment is a problem, major efforts are
`Why, if digital coding of a TV signal
`under way to shrink the frequency
`takes up so much more frequency
`space needed for digital TV.
`spectrum,
`isn’t high-resolution TV
`“One of the things we can do is
`more feasible with analog signals?
`reduce the numberofbits [binary dig-
`High-frequency noise is one reason.
`its] necessary to describe a picture,”
`Noise, which can spoil standard TV
`Connolly said. He pointed to oneof his
`images, devastates HDTV.
`“favorite symbols,” a CBS eye glowing
`Connolly demonstrated another ad-
`on monitors. Running his finger
`vantageofdigital TV by first showing
`across one scan line on the eye, he
`a 525-line analog-signal picture of a
`explained that it carried about 150
`fruit bowl from tape. Then he showed
`black pixels, then 200 blue, and 150
`the samepicture after it had been re-
`black ones again.
`recorded 10 times—a tenth-generation
`“We wastea lot of [frequency] spec-
`copy. The image was smeared, full of
`trum with analog TV because we
`noise, and color values were shifted.
`transmit every one of those things
`For broadcasting, about five genera-
`using the whole bandwidth,” Connolly
`tions is the limit, he said.
`said. With digital techniques, though,
`But scenesthatfollowed from tenth-
`a single brief signal can be encoded
`and even twentieth-generation digi-
`that tells the digital circuits in the
`tally coded tapes seemed unaltered
`receiver to create 150 black pixels.
`from the originals. Connolly com-
`This coding of the digital signal,
`pared analog taping to pouring
`requiring perhaps only a few dozen
`water from one glass to others: Some
`bits instead of hundredsof repetitive
`water sticks to each glass; retaping,
`signals, cuts the rate at which bits
`similarly, robs parts of the original
`must be transmitted—plus bandwidth
`signal with each generation.
`requirements. Similar bit-rate-reduc-
`110|POPULAR SCIENCE
`
`Digital signals, by contrast, are
`either the presence or absence of
`pulses on tape. They survive trans-
`mission and taping much better, and
`Connolly compared the digital tech-
`niqueto pouring marblesfrom glass to
`glass. The marbles (digital bits) get
`through unchanged.
`CBSengineers were impressed with
`Sony’s new digital recorder. “In just
`seven years there’s been a 50:1
`improvementin the ability to jam bits
`into a small area of tape,” said Flaher-
`ty. “We went from under one million
`[bits] per square inch to 40 million.
`Weonly need a 3:1 improvement over
`that to record [digital] HDTV.”
`CBSalso presented an NTSC video-
`tape madewith stereo sound at a Ken-
`nedy Center concert. HDTV research-
`ers believe stereo is needed to bring
`the realism of wide-screen movies and
`other programs into your home. Dur-
`ing the demonstration of a Mozart
`operatic aria, repeated switching be-
`tween stereo and monophonic modes
`made stereo’s advantages obvious.
`HDTVoffers superior color, too. A
`future international high-resolution-
`TV standard will no doubt provide viv-
`id hues that can’t be obtained with
`NTSC color standards. Moreover,
`HDTV pictures can be transmitted
`with luminance(brightness) and color
`signals separated. Standard TV sig-
`nals have combined these—disastrous
`for picture fidelity—to achieve com-
`patibility between black-and-white
`andcolor receivers.
`You mayfirst encounter HDTV not
`on a TV receiver but displayed on a
`theater movie screen. Sony might
`lease its prototype HDTV gear within
`a year for Hollywood production work
`that would be converted to film. Vid-
`eotaping offers advantages in econo-
`myandflexibility.
`In a different application, CBS
`plans to use HDTV in about three
`years to enhance standardbroadcasts:
`HDTVtapes would permitspecial pro-
`duction techniques, such as image
`enhancement and zooming without
`picture degradation, before conver-
`sion to regular NTSC recordings.
`Also, cable TV and homevideodiscs
`and tapes may bring HDTVto you in
`the 1980’s. You would need a special
`receiver or player, but such sources
`could bypass the standards and regu-
`latory problems of broadcast HDTV.
`“The real question is whetherthis is
`going to be available to the general
`public or whetherit will be something ~
`only for the videophile with the money
`to buy all these ancillaries,” said Fla-
`herty. Getting wide-band HDTVinto
`broadcast channels, he said, “depends
`on the skill of the engineering commu-
`nity to makeit fit.”
`
`tion coding can produce the 200 blue
`and 150 black pixels for an “eye” scan
`line.
`John Rossi of the CBS Technology
`Center (Stamford, Conn.) demonstrat-
`ed a CBS 4:1 bit-rate-reduction sys-
`tem with an analog videotape ma-
`chine. An NTSC 525-line test pattern
`shown on monitors was created by a
`digitally coded signal that required
`only 28 megabits (millionbits) per sec-
`ond instead of the 144 megabits/sec.
`from the original digital sampling.
`“This is a very simple bit-rate-
`reduction technique,” Rossi said. “The
`circuits can literally be held in the
`palm of your hand. This leads us to
`believe that with more-complex cir-
`cuits much higher bit-rate reductions
`can be achieved.”
`“Failing these bit-reduction
`schemes, HDTV will not be broadcast-
`able,” added Flaherty. He hopestofit
`digitally compressed high-resolution
`TV into a normal or nearly normal TV
`channel. “Much work has yet to be
`done,” he said, “but you can see we’ve
`achieved a 4:1 reduction in bits fairly
`well, transmitting a roughly equal-
`quality picture.”
`That test-pattern picture I saw had
`somenoise but carried thefine detail
`indicating most of the image wasget-
`ting through. For this demonstration,
`anormal4.2-MHz, 525-line NTSCsig-
`nal became a 114-megabit/sec. digital
`signal that was compressedinto a 28-
`megabit/sec. signal. But that digital
`525-line signal would require about
`four VHF channels on your TV set. An
`HDTVsignal, even before it’s digital-
`ly sampled, requires aboutfive.
`
`
`
`PMC Exhibit 2100
`Apple v. PMC
`IPR2016-01520
`Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket