throbber
Patterned, photon-driven cryoetching of GaAs and AlGaAs
`M. C. Shih, M. B. Freiler, R. Scarmozzino, and R. M. Osgood, Jr.
`Microelectronics Sciences Laboratories, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
`共Received 25 May 1994; accepted 19 October 1994兲
`
`We present a high-resolution, damage-free etching technique for GaAs and related compound
`semiconductors which utilizes surface-specific photochemistry at 193 nm to excite a physisorbed
`layer of Cl2 on a cryogenically cooled 共⬃140 K兲 sample. Etch rates as high as 0.25 Å/pulse
`共corresponding to 0.09 ␮m/min兲 have been achieved. Etching is anisotropic, and etched features of
`0.2–0.3 ␮m linewidth have been routinely obtained. The etch rate has been characterized as a
`function of several ‘‘system’’ parameters including Cl2-partial pressure, substrate-temperature, laser
`repetition rate and fluence, and the addition of rare gases. A phenomenological model of this
`cryoetching has been developed which agrees well with the experimental data. The etch damage and
`contamination have been studied with Auger electron spectroscopy, photoluminescence, and
`Schottky-barrier measurements. All results indicate that there is minimal if any damage induced by
`the cryoetching process. © 1995 American Vacuum Society.
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`High-resolution, damage-free etching of GaAs and related
`compound semiconductor materials is an increasingly impor-
`tant requirement in the fabrication of advanced photonic and
`electronic device structures. For example, both characteris-
`tics are crucial for the fabrication of very high speed
`recessed-gate metal–semiconductor field-effect
`transistor
`共MESFET兲 and heterostructure field-effect transistor 共HFET兲
`devices,1,2 and especially for the etching of one-dimensional
`共‘‘wires’’兲 and zero-dimensional 共‘‘dots’’兲 quantum-confined
`structures.3,4 The current methods of anisotropic etching rely
`heavily on reactive ion etching 共RIE兲 or chemically assisted
`ion-beam etching 共CAIBE兲, in which charged-particle bom-
`bardment is utilized to achieve desorption of the reacted
`products and to provide anisotropic etching along the beam
`direction. However, etching studies of III–V 共and II–VI兲 ma-
`terials have demonstrated that ion bombardment can result in
`damage to the etched surface, thus causing degradation of
`the electrical properties of patterned material.5–9 For ex-
`ample, in the case of etch-defined quantum-confined struc-
`tures, which is an issue of particular emphasis for the work
`described in this article, damage may actually render the de-
`vices inoperable for feature sizes less than 100 nm and can
`severely affect performance at even greater sizes.5,10,11 In
`these small structures, the depletion or recombination of car-
`riers due to the surface damage incurred during processing is
`particularly important and typically causes such an etched
`microstructure to be electrically nonconductive. In fact, dam-
`age may even limit the performance of large-scale devices.
`For example, recent studies by Thirstrup et al.12 demon-
`strated that etched waveguide structures
`in integrated
`GaInAs/InP electro-optic devices may have their perfor-
`mance degraded by etch-induced damage on the sidewall of
`the waveguide. Although several methods have been pro-
`posed to passivate or remove such damage by application of
`postprocessing steps such as regrowth or wet-chemical
`etching,13,14 their application adds complexity to the fabrica-
`tion process.
`Photo-induced surface chemistry provides an alternate
`
`route to achieving anisotropic etching, and the application of
`this technique to both liquid and gas-phase etching has been
`demonstrated.15–19 Typically, the etching chemistry is initi-
`ated as a result of direct absorption of a photon by the ab-
`sorbate molecule in the vicinity of a semiconductor substrate,
`or in the case of wet etching by the generation of charge
`carriers from the near-surface region of the semiconductor
`bulk. Thus, the process generally confines the reaction to the
`laser illuminated zone. This confinement provides process
`resolution as well as etching anisotropy. An important advan-
`tage of this form of etching, which is purely chemical in
`origin, is that it does not rely on the bombardment of mas-
`sive particles to achieve etching and thus damage is not in-
`curred. Moreover, the high flux of atomic species or carriers
`that is generated by laser irradiation makes it possible to
`obtain high surface-reaction rates. Etching resolution in such
`a neutral-atom, laser-assisted method is determined both by
`the quality of the imaging optics and by the confinement of
`the reactive species to the illuminated surface area. In the
`case of laser-assisted gas-phase or wet etching, diffusive mo-
`tion of the reactive photoactivated species or semiconductor
`mobile carriers, respectively, can reduce etching resolution.
`Recently it has been reported that cryogenic cooling of a
`substrate
`during
`silicon RIE can
`enhance
`etching
`anisotropy20,21 by suppressing any thermally initiated etch
`reactions, particularly on the etched sidewalls. We have de-
`scribed the use of cryogenic-etching technology to enhance
`process resolution for the case of photon-assisted etching.22
`In this etching, a cryogenic 共⬃140 K兲 physisorbed layer of
`molecular chlorine is formed on the surface of a GaAs wafer.
`The use of a continuously formed, then laser-dissociated,
`physisorbed molecular source contrasts with the use of laser
`desorption of a chemisorbed chloride layer reported in Ref.
`16. Illumination of this physisorbed adlayer by a deep-UV
`laser, e.g., at 193 nm, generates a surface-localized source of
`atomic chlorine that, along with the suppression of the etch
`rate in the nonirradiated area at low temperature, gives rise to
`an anisotropic etching process with high resolution. Since the
`etch reaction is purely photochemically initiated and the
`
`43
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13(1), Jan/Feb 1995
`
`0734-211X/95/13(1)/43/12/$1.00
`
`©1995 American Vacuum Society
`
`43
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`Samsung Exhibit 1012
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Daniel L. Flamm
` IPR2016-01512
`
`

`

`44
`
`Shih etal.: Patterned, photon-driven cryoetching of GaAs and AlGaAs
`
`44
`
`etched surface is not subjected to excessive laser heating,
`etch-induced damage should be minimized. In this article,
`we present a detailed discussion of this etching, focusing on
`its etch chemistry and pattern transfer capabilities, its para-
`metric behavior and the modeling of this behavior, the use of
`this etching in the fabrication of a semiconductor laser, and
`the results of various measurements, such as Auger electron
`spectroscopy 共AES兲, photoluminescence, and Schottky-
`barrier characteristics on etched surfaces.
`
`II. DESCRIPTION OF CRYOETCHING
`
`A. Summary of the relevant etch chemistry
`
`The reaction of molecular and atomic chlorine with vari-
`ous surfaces of GaAs has recently been the subject of several
`studies. A detailed understanding of the process is made dif-
`ficult by the fact that multiple sets of etch reactions dominate
`for different conditions of chlorine adsorbate coverage, ex-
`tent of reaction, and substrate temperature. While a complete
`understanding is not yet at hand, a reasonable understanding
`can be drawn from the common findings of these experi-
`ments.
`Chlorine in its atomic and molecular forms exhibits very
`different behavior in so far as its reaction with and sticking
`to the surface of GaAs is concerned. For example, earlier
`research has shown clearly that molecular chlorine exhibits a
`much smaller
`reactive sticking coefficient
`than atomic
`chlorine.23,24 Recent molecular-beam experiments have
`shown strong evidence that when Cl2 impinges on a GaAs
`surface it sticks and reacts via two separate mechanisms.25 At
`low translational energies, i.e., E i⭐0.05 eV, such as those
`predominating at temperatures below room temperature, ad-
`sorption is via a physisorbed precursor-mediated mechanism.
`At higher kinetic energies, i.e., E i⭓0.05 eV, adsorption is
`via direct chemisorption. Since the reaction barrier to chemi-
`sorption from the precursor-mediated state is larger than 0.05
`eV, condensed chlorine layers at cryogenic temperatures are
`expected to remain predominantly in their physisorbed state.
`The surface-bound reaction products of chlorine on GaAs
`depend on the degree of exposure to the reactant flux as well
`as the form, i.e., atomic or molecular, of the reactant. For
`example, thermal desorption studies by French, Balch, and
`Ford26 showed that for GaAs at room temperature, exposure
`to low dosages of Cl2 resulted in the formation of only GaCl
`and free arsenic, while at higher exposures the more volatile
`triatomic species, AsCl3 and GaCl3, dominated. On the other
`hand, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy 共XPS兲 studies by
`Freedman and Stinespring23,24 have shown that surface reac-
`tion with atomic chlorine leads to the formation of both gal-
`lium and arsenic chlorides—even at the low substrate tem-
`peratures of 130 K in that study. Again, higher coverages of
`chlorine lead to the formation of the di- or trichloride spe-
`cies.
`Desorption of product species also plays a key role in
`determining the etching characteristics. For example, in the
`molecular-beam studies alluded to above,24 it was found that
`on a carefully prepared, fully crystalline surface, low volatil-
`ity reaction products can effectively passivate a surface by
`blocking surface-reaction sites. Progressive chlorination of
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 13, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1995
`
`the surface can alleviate this problem by forming the more
`volatile AsCl3 or GaCl3. However, at lower temperatures,
`even these species will remain surface bound. In fact, a sur-
`face temperature of 175 K is needed to desorb AsCl3 and 210
`K to desorb GaCl3.27 It has been suggested separately28,29
`that the difference in the volatility of these two compounds
`can lead to surface roughening during etching.
`Finally, in many of these prior studies, the specific surface
`crystallographic orientation of the GaAs substrate has been
`found to be important to the etching mechanism. For ex-
`ample, while the initial sticking coefficient of chlorine mol-
`ecules on a bare, well prepared GaAs surface is relatively
`insensitive to surface orientation, the passivation phenomena
`mentioned in the previous paragraph is surface-orientation
`dependent. Note, however, that such passivation appears to
`be only important in inhibiting reaction for the case of the
`molecular chlorine.
`In addition to the general studies of the surface chemistry
`of chlorine, there has been prior investigation of the photo-
`chemistry of physisorbed chlorine on GaAs; this work, in
`fact, helped motivate the etching experiments discussed here.
`In this study, Liberman, Haase, and Osgood27 reported that in
`the absence of UV irradiation, multilayers of molecular chlo-
`rine could be readily physisorbed on a GaAs共110兲 surface at
`85 K. In addition to this physisorbed layer, ⬃1 ML 共mono-
`layer兲 of chlorine was dissociatively chemisorbed. The com-
`position of this chemisorbed species was found to be in
`agreement with the molecular-beam results discussed above.
`In particular, temperature programmed desorption 共TPD兲 of
`this reacted layer suggested that GaCl, As2, and As4 were the
`predominant desorption products. Irradiation with 193, 248,
`or 350 nm light was found to induce a much more extensive
`chlorination of the GaAs共110兲 surface and, after extended
`exposure to the UV radiation, AsCl3 appeared in the thermal
`desorption spectrum at 175 K. The enhanced chlorination
`was attributed to the reaction of chlorine atoms which were
`generated by both direct UV photolysis, and for 248 and 193
`nm irradiation, by a UV-induced intermolecular-electron-
`transfer process in the condensed chlorine film.30 This
`intermolecular-electron-transfer process is possible only in
`the condensed film of chlorine and was found to be the domi-
`nant dissociation channel only at 193 nm. Further, the time-
`of-flight 共TOF兲 signatures of the desorbed products in our
`previous study27 indicated that in the presence of UV illumi-
`nation, enhanced dissociation of the etch products occurred,
`thus providing a route for photoactivated desorption. This
`enhanced dissociation is most probably due to direct or
`substrate-electron-initiated bond cleavage of the reaction
`products 共see below兲.
`
`B. Photon-assisted cryoetching
`
`The above results suggest that an etching reaction can be
`achieved by forming monolayers of physisorbed Cl2 on a
`GaAs surface, followed by subsequent irradiation of this sur-
`face with a laser wavelength selected so as to excite domi-
`nantly the physisorbed layer of chlorine, thus creating a re-
`active and localized atomic chlorine source on the GaAs
`surface. This atomic chlorine source allows the multiply
`chlorinated compounds, AsCl3 and GaCl3, to form on the
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`

`45
`
`Shih etal.: Patterned, photon-driven cryoetching of GaAs and AlGaAs
`
`45
`
`FIG. 2. A sketch of the cryoetching system with sample loadlock. The
`sample is preheated to 210 °C in the preparation chamber to desorb residual
`moisture.
`
`fects. Finally, after each pulse a new physisorbed layer of Cl2
`forms on the GaAs surface.
`
`III. ETCHING CHAMBER AND EXPERIMENTAL
`PROCEDURE
`Figure 2 presents a sketch of the etching chamber used in
`our experiment. The chamber is made of stainless steel and
`can be pumped to a base pressure of ⬃10⫺7 Torr with a
`turbomolecular pump 共pumping speed ⬃600 l /s兲. The
`sample is mounted on a molybdenum plate by indium bond-
`ing to achieve good thermal contact. Before etching, the
`sample is heated to 210 °C in a preparation chamber to melt
`the indium foil and to desorb residual moisture on the
`sample. The molybdenum sample plate is then transferred
`into the chamber through a loadlock mechanism and fixed on
`a molybdenum etching platform, which is in contact with a
`copper heat sink cooled by a liquid-nitrogen dewar. The
`sample temperature is measured by a K-type thermocouple,
`spot welded close to the sample, and a digital temperature
`controller maintains the sample temperature to within 1 K of
`its set value. During etching, the etching chamber is continu-
`ously pumped while chlorine gas 共99.999% pure兲 is intro-
`duced through a small tube directed toward the quartz win-
`dow ⬃2.5 cm above the sample; this gas-flow direction
`serves to homogenize the condensation of chlorine molecules
`on the sample. The sample is illuminated with the output
`from a 15 ns pulse-length excimer laser operating at 193 nm.
`The light from the laser is collimated and homogenized using
`a pair of cylindrical lenses, then passed through a square
`aperture which is projected onto the sample surface such that
`a uniformly illuminated region is achieved on the sample
`surface. All samples were chemically cleaned by sequential
`immersion in trichloroethylene, acetone, methanol, and
`deionized water. After this cleaning, they were rinsed in a
`NH4OH:H2O2共1:1兲 solution for 10 min to remove any native
`oxide. Most etching experiments utilized samples of
`GaAs共100兲 共n type, 4⫻1017 cm⫺3兲; however, a limited num-
`ber of samples with different crystal orientation, particularly
`n type, 4⫻1017 cm⫺3 GaAs共110兲, and different doping type
`and doping level were used to determine if there were any
`strong dopant-dependent effects. In order to reveal the selec-
`
`FIG. 1. The laser-assisted cryoetching process. 共a兲 Before laser irradiation,
`molecular chlorine is physisorbed on the cryogenically cooled substrate. 共b兲
`Laser irradiation dissociates the physisorbed chlorine molecules which then
`react with the surface, and desorbs the chloride reaction products. 共c兲 After
`laser irradiation, the bare, etched GaAs surface again physisorbs Cl2 mol-
`ecules.
`
`semiconductor surface. These may be then desorbed as AsCl3
`and GaClx (x⫽2,3) via surface heating or photolysis, thus
`achieving continuous etching. In such a process, the reactive
`area is confined to the laser-beam-irradiated zone and the
`thermal background reaction in the nonirradiated area is sup-
`pressed by the low ambient temperature. Further, since the
`laser fluence is relatively low, the etched surface structure
`should not be damaged. In effect, the physisorbed molecules
`act as an atomically thin, ⬃1–3 ML, dry ‘‘photoresist’’
`which is continuously replenished between pulses by the
`low-pressure gas-phase ambient. Finally, note that flood illu-
`mination can be used if patterning is accomplished with sur-
`face masking.
`Figure 1 illustrates the general features of the UV-assisted
`cryogenic etching process. At the beginning of each etching
`cycle, a physisorbed layer of molecular chlorine is formed on
`the cooled GaAs surface by impingement of a flux of mo-
`lecular chlorine from a gas-phase ambient. Next, a 193 nm
`laser pulse irradiates the physisorbed layer of chlorine pro-
`ducing a surface-localized source of atomic chlorine; a per-
`centage of these reactive chlorine atoms react with the non-
`masked GaAs surface to form AsCl3 and GaClx (x⫽2,3),
`which are nonvolatile at the cryogenic temperatures used
`here. Also during laser illumination, desorption of the chlo-
`rine products occurs at the laser fluence, 15–20 mJ/cm2,
`which is typical in our experiments. This process appears to
`occur primarily through low-temperature photochemical ef-
`
`JVST B - Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`

`46
`
`Shih etal.: Patterned, photon-driven cryoetching of GaAs and AlGaAs
`
`46
`
`FIG. 3. SEM photos of submicrometer cryoetching of GaAs共100兲 using an
`Au surface mask. The etching was done at a fluence of 21 mJ/cm2, the
`exposure time was 30 min at 60-Hz repetition rate, the sample temperature
`was 140 K, and the chlorine-ambient pressure was 5 mTorr.
`
`tivity of etching, samples of molecular-beam epitaxy grown
`共MBE兲 AlxGa1⫺xAs on GaAs, with differing Al content were
`also examined.
`
`FIG. 4. Cross sectional SEM photograph showing crystallographic etching.
`Etched mesa profiles along the 共11¯0兲 directions on the GaAS 共110兲 surface
`are shown. The etching was done at 共a兲 T s⫽140 K and 共b兲 T s⫽300 K, the
`laser fluence 共193 nm兲 was 21 mJ/cm2 and the chlorine pressure was 5
`mTorr.
`
`IV. PATTERN TRANSFER
`An important requirement of a viable dry etching process
`is its ability to transfer images of high spatial resolution.
`Pattern transfer must rely on noncrystallographic etching for
`the process to be generally applicable as a fabrication tech-
`nique. In addition, the etching chemistry must be sufficiently
`controlled that a practical surface-mask material is available
`and that undercutting of the surface mask does not occur.
`These properties were investigated using GaAs samples that
`were patterned with either 1 ␮m scale optical lithography or,
`for features ⬍1 ␮m, via electron-beam patterned surface
`masks formed at Cornell University’s National Nanofabrica-
`tion Facility.
`For example, in order to study the resolution limits of this
`etching process, we investigated the use of various forms of
`surface masks to pattern features as small as 0.2 ␮m. Several
`different materials were used, including Au/Cr and Si3N4.
`Both of these mask material systems were suitable for use as
`surface masks since both were inert to the etching chemistry
`used here. However, a close examination of the etched fea-
`tures formed at 0.6 ␮m resolution indicated that the Si3N4
`mask showed a significant near-surface undercut. We at-
`tribute this undercutting to the enhanced reactivity of the
`material just under the nitride mask which we believe to be
`strained, as has been observed in Ref. 31. When the Au/Cr
`mask was used, undercutting was significantly reduced and
`features as small as 0.2 ␮m could be made reproducibly.
`Figure 3 is an electron micrograph of a typical Au/Cr
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 13, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1995
`
`patterned and etched GaAs共100兲 sample with 0.2–0.3 ␮m
`pattern features etched to a depth of 0.4 ␮m. The etching was
`done with 20 mJ/cm2 laser fluence 共60 Hz兲 at 140 K substrate
`temperature and 5 mTorr chlorine ambient pressure for 30
`min. Note that the etched morphology is smooth and exhibits
`little undercutting.
`For some Cl2-based plasma etching and for thermal etch-
`ing of GaAs, the etching rate exhibits crystallographic an-
`in this etching, k 具111典B⬎k 具110典⫽k 具100典
`isotropy. Typically,
`⬎k 具111典A, where k具x典 is the reaction rate for surface x.32–34
`However, in our case, no such crystallographic anisotropy of
`etching was observed. Figure 4 shows two electron micro-
`graphs of mesa cross sections which are formed by pattern-
`ing along the 具11¯0典 direction on a GaAs共110兲 surface by
`UV-assisted chlorine etching. In both cases, the same laser
`fluence and chlorine partial pressure were used. In one case
`the substrate is at T⫽140 K and in the other 300 K; thus
`allowing us to compare photochannel etching from a cryo-
`genic film and from a gas ambient, respectively. We note
`here that the etching reaction at the higher temperatures is
`primarily thermally driven.18 The results show that in con-
`trast to gas-phase Cl etching, the cryoetching is not crystal-
`lographic. The lack of crystallographic etching is in agree-
`ment with the results of Freedman and Stinespring23,24 who
`showed that there is no preference in Cl-atom chemisorption
`for particular crystalline surfaces. In contrast to the results
`seen for thermally activated etching of GaAs by Cl2, the
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`

`47
`
`Shih etal.: Patterned, photon-driven cryoetching of GaAs and AlGaAs
`
`47
`
`slope of the etched sidewall in our cryoetching is the same
`for all crystal orientations. There are a number of possible
`explanations for the origin of the sidewall slope, the most
`obvious stemming from the fact that the shape of the trench
`should reflect the local intensity distribution of the etching
`radiation. Thus as is seen in some photoresist exposure, dif-
`fractive effects at the edge of small features would reduce the
`light intensity at the wall and thus reduce the local etch rate.
`The fact that in some cases the contour of the etch feature
`showed features suggesting Fresnel diffraction supports this
`explanation. Note that once a sloped sidewall is formed, the
`well known reduction of the flux with incident angle would
`ensure a continued slower etch rate.
`Surface roughness and etch-depth uniformity provide an
`important measurement of the quality of any device-etching
`technique, since both influence the fidelity of pattern transfer
`as well the amount of surface carrier recombination. At low
`substrate temperatures, the condensation of gas-phase impu-
`rities on the surface leads to the blockage of surface sites or
`possibly even microscopic surface regions if impurity islands
`are formed. Thus, in our experiments, it was found that the
`lower the etching temperature, the more the morphology de-
`graded. After installing the loadlock assembly to eliminate
`any introduction of water vapor, etc., into the etching cham-
`ber while loading and unloading the sample, a significant
`improvement in morphology was achieved. However, an in-
`trinsic roughness of ⭐50 Å was still detected on etched sur-
`faces upon scanning electron microscopy 共SEM兲 and profilo-
`meter examination. This ⭐50 Å roughness appears to be
`intrinsic to the process chemistry.
`
`V. PARAMETRIC BEHAVIOR AND MODEL
`
`A. Etch rate measurements
`
`In order to understand the properties of the etching pro-
`cess, sets of experiments were done to characterize its para-
`metric behavior. In these experiments,
`the excimer-laser
`beam was patterned by a shadow mask into a narrow rect-
`angle of illumination. After irradiating the sample for a set
`time, the mask and the laser beam were translated together
`by a fraction of the length of the rectangle, and a second
`exposure was made. The etch depths of the various regions
`were then measured by stylus profilometry, and the etch rate
`was determined by the slope of a graph of the etch depth
`versus exposure time. Figure 5 shows the plot of etch depth
`versus etch time that was done under typical etching condi-
`tions. The linear increase of the etched depth with exposure
`time is consistent with the absence of a buildup of etch-
`resistant products such as often occurs in plasma-etch
`techniques.35 Generally, there is a short induction period seen
`at the beginning of exposure time. Since this induction time
`was affected by the details of the surface cleaning procedure,
`for example the time of rinsing in NH4OH:H2O⫽1:1 solu-
`tion, we believe that the induction time results from the pres-
`ence of a native oxide layer which is more resistant to the
`etching chemistry than is the pure semiconductor. If care was
`taken to remove most of the surface native oxide 共ex situ兲,
`the induction period was reduced.
`
`JVST B - Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures
`
`FIG. 5. Etched depth of GaAs共100兲 vs laser-exposure time. The etching was
`done at 120 K, 15 mJ/cm2 共60 Hz兲, and 2 mTorr of Cl2 .
`
`In most dry etching systems, the pressure of the reactive
`gases is an important factor in determining the etch rate. As
`mentioned above, the chlorine partial pressure determines
`the coverage of the physisorbed layer of chlorine on the
`GaAs surface; this layer is then the source for chlorine at-
`oms. Thus for our low-temperature etching, the functional
`dependence of the etch rate on Cl2 partial pressure will stem
`from the variation of the coverage of the physisorption mol-
`ecules with the partial pressure of the ambient gas. Figure 6
`shows the variation of the etch rate with chlorine partial pres-
`sure, with the substrate temperature maintained at 150 K and
`laser fluence at 31.5 mJ/cm2. The figure also contains the
`results of a curve calculated by a model based on multilayer
`physisorption to be described later. At low pressures, the etch
`rate increased rapidly with pressure until it reached a plateau
`at about 10 mTorr. This pressure corresponds to a steady-
`state coverage of 1 ML as calculated from our model. After
`this plateau, the etch rate increases more rapidly with pres-
`sure, as the physisorbed chlorine begins to exhibit multilayer
`condensation. A typical etch rate is 0.08 Å/pulse at 1 ML
`
`FIG. 6. Etch rate vs chlorine pressure for etching of GaAs共110兲 at 150 K and
`31.5 mJ/cm2 共60 Hz兲. The plateau at 10–25 mTorr is indicative of 1 ML of
`Cl2 coverage.
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`

`48
`
`Shih etal.: Patterned, photon-driven cryoetching of GaAs and AlGaAs
`
`48
`
`FIG. 7. The dependence of etch rate on substrate temperature for the etching
`of GaAs共110兲. The etching was done at 10 mTorr Cl2 and 21 mJ/cm2 共60
`Hz兲.
`
`FIG. 8. Dependence of the etch rate of GaAS共110兲 on laser fluence at 60-Hz
`repetition rate, 140 K, and 10 mTorr Cl2 pressure.
`
`coverage and at 31.5 mJ/cm2 193 nm irradiation with a 20
`Hz repetition rate; this would correspond to 96 Å/min. This
`rate is somewhat slower than for thermal or RIE etching;
`however, the amount of etching is precisely controlled by the
`number of laser pulses. The fact that the etch rate is strongly
`dependent on chlorine pressures for p⬍10 mTorr suggests
`that etching is source-limited in this pressure regime and that
`desorption process is nearly complete after each pulse. The
`rate-limiting factor is thus the formation rate of products,
`which is proportional to the number of chlorine atoms cre-
`ated on the surface, and directly related to physisorbed-
`chlorine coverage.
`Intuitively, based on the usual activation energy for a re-
`action sequence, we expect that a dry etching process will
`exhibit a dependence on the substrate temperature. Typically,
`the higher the substrate temperature, the higher the etch rate,
`a behavior generally seen in the thermal and RIE etching.
`However, in our low-temperature etching process we found
`the opposite behavior, namely the etch rate decreased as sub-
`strate temperature increased. Figure 7 shows the dependence
`of the etch rate on substrate temperature while keeping chlo-
`rine partial pressure at 10 mTorr and laser fluence at 21
`mJ/cm2 and 60 Hz. The etch rate decreases nearly exponen-
`tially with increasing temperature. This increase in etch rate
`with increasing pressure and decreasing temperature is con-
`sistent with an etching process that is initiated by Cl atoms
`photogenerated from the physisorbed chlorine layer. As we
`will show below, the pressure and temperature dependences
`also indicate that the etch rate is surface-reaction limited.
`Again, this etching behavior clearly shows that there is an
`important difference in the etching mechanism from other
`gas-phase laser-assisted etching or RIE in which the etch rate
`generally increases exponentially with temperature.
`An important feature of the etching process is that the 193
`nm laser irradiation directly initiates a photoreaction in the
`physisorbed chlorine layer, as well as achieving desorption
`of the chloride compounds 关AsCl3 and GaClx (x⫽2,3)兴.
`Figure 8 shows the etch depth per pulse as a function of laser
`fluence. For fluences below 30 mJ/cm2, the etch rate in-
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 13, No. 1, Jan/Feb 1995
`
`creases linearly with fluence, as would be consistent with a
`single-photon photodissociation process. Above 30 mJ/cm2,
`the etch rate increases superlinearly with fluence, which may
`indicate an enhancement of the etch rate due to the onset of
`thermally initiated reactions or a contribution from multipho-
`ton photodissociation processes at higher laser fluence 共a
`phenomenon that also has been found in other much higher-
`laser-fluence processing兲. Initially, we found that no etching
`occurred for fluences below 7 mJ/cm2. However, this thresh-
`old was reduced to 3.5 mJ/cm2 by first etching the sample at
`high fluence, then reducing the laser fluence. We believe that
`the threshold at 7 mJ/cm2 is determined by the need to etch
`through the native oxide layer. The threshold at 3.5 mJ/cm2
`may be due to the inefficient desorption of the reaction prod-
`ucts at low laser fluences, or the presence of an etch resistant
`layer formed from redeposition of the etched products during
`the etching process. Regarding the desorption of etch prod-
`ucts, while it is clear that pulsed irradiation can result in
`limited surface heating, in our case this heating appears to be
`of inadequate magnitude, in itself,26 to cause removal of the
`etch products. In particular, a calculation of the thermal de-
`sorption due to the short-pulse laser heating,36 and using
`published desorption data and GaAs thermal properties.37
`suggests that the desorption of etch products due to laser
`heating at 20 mJ/cm2 is insufficient in itself to desorb the
`etch products. Electron-hole pairs are well known to be im-
`portant in many areas of surface photochemistry and may
`thus be important in this case.
`In order to probe the dynamics of the etching process, the
`etch rate was characterized as a function of the reciprocal of
`the repetition rate; this measurement thus samples the pro-
`cess rate as the time between each consecutive pulse is de-
`creased. As shown in Fig. 9, at low repetition rates 共below 10
`Hz兲, the etch depth per pulse is insensitive to the time be-
`tween two successive laser pulses. At high repetition rates
`共above 50 Hz兲, the etch depth per pulse was observed to fall
`off quickly with decreasing interpulse time. Assuming that
`each laser pulse desorbs all physisorbed species and reacted
`chloride products, the etch rate should be proportional to
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`

`49
`
`Shih etal.: Patterned, photon-driven cryoetching of GaAs and AlGaAs
`
`49
`
`FIG. 9. Etch rate versus laser repetition rate for the etching of GaAs共110兲 at
`140 K and 21 mJ/cm2 共60 Hz兲 using two different chlorine pressures, 10 and
`25 mTorr.
`
`FIG. 10. Etch depth versus exposure time for AlxGa1⫺xAs alloys with dif-
`ferent Al content, showing an increase in etch rate with increased Al con-
`centration. The etching was done at 140 K, 5 mTorr of chlorine, and a laser
`fluence of 21 mJ/cm2 共60 Hz兲.
`
`physisorbed chlorine coverage, ␪, for ␪Ⰶ1. The low etch rate
`at the high repetition rates suggests that full physisorbed
`chlorine coverage is not obtained with short interpulse spac-
`ings.
`in ion etching of GaAs heterostructures,
`Typically,
`AlGaAs is observed to etch at a rate less than or equal to that
`of GaAs.
`For
`example,
`in
`fluorine-based
`etching
`chemistries38,39 共such as CHClF2, CHCl2F, or SiF4/SiCl4兲,
`very high selectivity of GaAs over AlGaAs has been found
`and attributed in part to the formation of a passivating layer
`of AlF3. For Chlorine-based etching chemistries, the etch-
`rate difference has been attributed entirely to the formation
`of a passivating Al2O3 layer, originating either from residual
`water vapor40 or the deliberate addition of O2 to the etching
`mixture41 rather than from differential volatility of the etch
`products. However, in high vacuum studies of ion etching
`with Cl2 or BCl3, in which presumably less impurity levels
`of H2O, etc., are present, researchers have found near equal
`etching rates for GaA

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket