throbber
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
`Exhibit 1022
`
`Page 1 of 10
`
`

`
`
`
`Pan American Petroleum Corporation
`
`C. R. Fast
`
`Research Group Supervisor
`
`Pan American Petroleum Corporation
`
`
`
`Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME
`
`Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME
`
`New York
`
`1970
`
`Dallas
`
`Page 2 of 10
`Page 2 of 10
`
`Hydraulic Fracturing
`
`G. C. Howard
`
`Special R esearch Associate
`
`

`
` l l l 1
`
`DEDICATIO-N_
`
`We wish to dedicate this book to our wives, Anne
`and Virginia, without whose cooperation this book
`would not have been possible.
`
`© Copyright 1970 by the American institute of Mining. Metal-
`lurgicai, and Petroleum Engineers.
`Inc. Printed in the United
`States of America by Millet the Printer, Dallas, Tex. All rights
`reserved. This book, or parts thereof, cannot be reproduced
`without written consent of the publisher.
`
`Page 3 of 10
`Page 3 of 10
`
`

`
`
`
`HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
`
`judging the relative merits of various hydraulic frac-
`turing treating procedures and the results to be ex-
`pected from such a stimulation method. In other words,
`this Monograph is a basic reference book and a working
`text for the practicing engineer.
`
`1.3 Historical Background
`
`injection pressure decreases when
`that
`The fact
`water, acid, cement or oil
`is pumped into a formation
`at a high rate and at a high initial pressure has been
`the subject of a number of studies.
`
`Acidizing of Oil and Gas Wells
`
`The Pure Oil Co. in cooperation with Dow Chemical
`Co. performed the first acidizing of an oil well (Feb.
`11, 1932) on Pure’s Fox No. 6 well
`in Midland
`
`County, Mich. A 15 percent (by weight) hydrochloric
`acid with an arsenic inhibitor was used. By" 1934,
`acidizing was an accepted practice for well stimulation
`in areas where the producing formation was limestone.
`From 1945 to 1963, the technological improvements
`in acidizing were basically limited to the development
`of acid fracturing techniques and materials, and to
`the use of surfaceactive agents. No change in acid
`composition was noted during this period. As a result
`of the development of high-pressure, high—rate pump-
`ing equipment, oil and gas wells were acidized at
`fracture inducing rates and pressures.”-‘
`Fitzgerald. In his comments on I. B. Clark’s paper
`on the Hydrafrac process“, P. E. Fitzgerald reflected the
`thinking of many engineers when he stated that pressure
`parting or formation lifting played an important part in
`the treatment of many wells where fluids were injected.
`The pressure parting phenomenon had long been
`recognized in well acidizing operations. For example,
`at pressures below those required to lift
`the over-
`burden,
`the formation would take substantially no
`fluid, but when a pressure high enough to part or
`fracture the formation was reached,
`the rate of fluid
`injection could be raised with little or no increase
`in the injection pressure.
`After the acid entered the formation the chemical
`
`thus further enlarg-
`reaction dissolved the formation,
`ing the established fracture. Since the characteristics
`of the rock are not uniform, more rock was dissolved
`by the acid in some places than in others,
`so that
`when the treatment was concluded the pressure—parted
`fracture could not completely close,
`and remained
`open to serve as a flow channel
`to the well.
`
`Water Injection
`
`Dickey and Ancferscu. From their study of water
`input wells, Dickey and Andersen‘ concluded that
`when the pressure at
`the bottom of an input well
`was raised above a certain value,
`the well
`took much
`more water than it normally would take. This critical
`pressure at the sand face ranges between 1.0 and 1.7
`psi per foot of depth in the northwestern Pennsylvania
`
`and eastern Illinois oil and gas fields (260 to 2,075 ft).
`The critical pressure also was observed to vary with
`depth and was, therefore, some function of the weight
`of the overlying rock. Assuming the specific gravity
`of water-saturated sedimentary rocks to be about 2.2,
`the pressure of the overburden would be approximately
`1.0 psi per foot of depth.
`these break-
`Dickey and Andersen concluded that
`throughs, or breaks in injection pressure, were the
`result of a rupture or fracture of the formation.
`Grebe. In the same vein, Grebe“ reported in 1943
`that a sand formation in a well 810 ft deep was broken
`down with a brine solution at a surface pressure of
`720 psi. Backflow tests indicated that
`there was an
`exact balance at 360 psi (surface pressure) at which
`water would go in or out of the formation with very
`little pressure change. The weight of the earth above
`the point of formation fracture was determined by
`adding 360 psi
`to the head of 810 ft of brine. The
`average density of the earth proved to be about 2.2
`(09548 psi/ft).
`Grebe cited another case: a well 3,000 it deep in
`which a formation breakdown was observed at a sur-
`
`face pressure of 1,500 psi while the well was being
`acidized. The formation lifting factor was calculated
`to be 0.968 psi/ft.
`Yuster and Cafhoim. In their study of pressure part-
`ing of formations in watertlood operations, Yuster and
`Calhoun“ observed that overburden lifting does not
`mean that
`the entire overburden from a given input
`point to the surrounding producers is lifted by the water
`and actually floated on it.
`(While such a situation is
`
`theoretically possible, it would be the very rare excep-
`tion rather than the rule.) Lifting of the overburden
`was defined as the parting of the rock or matrix at
`any bedding plane by the injection of fluid at pressures
`in excess of
`those tending to hold the
`formation
`together.
`The implication that
`
`the downward force in a lift-
`
`the complete weight of the overburden
`ing process is
`does not necessarily hold true at all
`times. The force
`depends upon the physical condition of the overlying
`strata and is controlled by such factors as plasticity,
`compressibility, elasticity, and attitude of
`the strata.
`An analogy may illustrate this point. If the overburden
`were made up of 21 series of pillows topped by a series
`of books,
`it would be possibie to part
`the formation
`locally by compressing the pillow or pillows upward
`and/or downward without
`lifting the
`entire over-
`burden. The point or elevation of the wellhore where
`the formation has the lowest tensile strength wilt break
`first, while other fractures may occur if
`the pressure
`is great enough.
`If a
`fracture initiated by excessive pressures has
`impermeable boundaries,
`it will continue to advance
`into the formation until it reaches a sink or barrier.
`Yustcr and Calhoun“ further stated that
`if one or
`
`both boundaries of the horizontal fracture formed by
`Page 4 of 10
`Page 4 of 10
`
`

`
`
`
`3
`
`in which the cement slurry can lodge beyond the wall
`of the hole. This phenomenon has been confirmed from
`cores of sand formations in sidetracked holes adjacent
`to sections of hole that have been squeezed previously.
`The cores reveal that the cement slurry sets as rela-
`tively thin laminations between the individual
`sand
`beds.
`
`Rock samples (Fig. 1.1) recovered in shallow well
`squeezc—cementing tests” illustrate this parting of the
`formation.
`
`In their investigation of
`Teplitz and Hassebroek.
`squeeze cementing, Teplitz and Hassebroelcm observed
`that to inject the cement slurry injection pressures must
`be great enough to lift the overlying formations. This al-
`lows the cement slurry to How into the parting between
`the formations in a pancake shape and form a barrier
`tojvertical movement of fluids in the formation sur-
`rounding the casing. Teplitz and I-Iassebroek reasoned
`that it would be advisable to stop the injection of ce-
`ment shortly aftcr the pressure against
`the formation
`has exceeded that of the overburden, and after a reason-
`able quantity of cement has been forced out,
`since
`prolonged injection of cement at high pressure can only
`fracture the zone to a degree detrimental to the well.
`The sand core pictured in Fig. 1.2 demonstrates the
`results of such harmful action. This core was obtained
`
`from the producing horizon in a sidetracked well after
`the original hole had been subjected to a number of
`squeeze jobs. According to the best estimates,
`the lat-
`eral displacement of this core from the squeeze zone in
`the original well was approximately 21 ft. It should be
`noted that the prominent cement vein runs perpendicu-
`lar to the plane of bedding in the sand.
`A microscopic examination of the core revealed a
`thin filter cake, containing barites, between the cement
`and the face of the sand; but no trace of cement or mud
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`excessive pressure were permeable, the fracture would
`extend into the formation until the friction of the fluid
`
`flowing into it caused just enough drop in pressure to
`create a balance between the pressure in the liquid and
`the combined counter-force of the tensile strength of the
`formation and the downward pressure of the overbur-
`den.
`
`In a second article on waterflooding, Yuster and Cal-
`houn? concluded that
`the parting of
`formations in
`waterllood operations is indicated by a sudden increase
`in the rate of input without a corresponding increase in
`pressure. A graph of water input rate vs pressure might
`even show, at the point where parting or fracturing of
`the formation occurs, a definite decrease in injection
`pressure.
`
`The formation parting factor for injection wells‘-in
`the Bradford and Allegheny fields Pennsylvania
`varied from 0.8 to 1.4 psi/ft. The low parting fac-
`tors were confined generally to wells on the crest of the
`structure while the higher parting factors were as-
`sociated with wells low on the structure. A plot of these
`factors vs depth indicated a trend of decreasing factors
`with increasing depth.
`As a side—light to their study of waterflooding, Yuster
`and Calhoun noted that for successful acidizing_ and
`squeeze—ccmcnting operations, pressures must be high
`enough to part the formation.
`
`Squeeze Cementing
`
`Torrey. Early recognition of the fracturing pheno-
`menon in squeeze cementing was reported by P. D.
`Torreyfi‘ He presented geological and engineering in-
`formation to show that the fluid pressures involved in
`squeeze cementing part the rocks, generally along bed-
`ding planes or other lines of sedimentary weakness.
`The fracture formed provides channels or passageways
`
`i1
`
`i I I
`
`iI
`
`\ Il
`
`1'
`
`RED CHEMENT
`(FIRST JOB)
`
`SANDS TONE
`
`(SECOND JOB)
`
`YELLOW CEMENT
`
`BLACK CEMENT
`
`(THiRD JOB)
`
`Fig. 1.1 Relative iocation of cement pancakes on three successive squeeze cementing operations.
`Page 5 of 10
`Page 5 of 10
`
`

`
`Bibliography
`
`Alderman, E. N. and Woodard, G. W.: “Prevention of
`Secondary Deposition from Waterflood Brines”, Drill.
`and Prod. Prac., API (1957) 98.
`
`Anderson, Terry 0. and Stahl, Edwin J.: “A Study-of
`Induced Fracturing Using an Instrumental Approach”,
`J. Pet. Tech. (Feb., 1967) 261-267.
`
`Arps, J. 1.: “Estimation of Primary Oil Reserves”, Trans.,
`AIME (1956) 207, 182-191.
`
`Atkinson, C. H.: “Subsurface Fracturing from Shoal Nu-
`clear Detonation”, Report PNE 3001, USAEC-USBM
`(Nov., 1964).
`
`Atkinson, C. H. and Lekas, M. A.: “Atomic-Age Fractur-
`ing May Soon Open Up Stubborn Reservoirs”, Oil and
`Gas J. (Dec. 2, 1963) LXI, No. 48, 154-156.
`
`“Radioactivity Associated with Under-
`Batzel, R. E.:
`ground Nuclear Explosions”, Report UCRL 5623, Law-
`rence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif.
`(June,
`1959).
`
`Bearden, W. G.: “Technical Information on the Hydrafrac
`Service”, unpublished report, Pan American Petroleum
`Corp., Tulsa, Okla. (Jan., 1953).
`
`Bernard, G. G., Holm, L. W. and Jacobs, W. L.: “Effect
`of Foam on Trapped Gas Saturation and on Permeability
`of Porous Media to Water”, Soc. Pet. Eng. J.
`(Dec.,
`1965) 295-300.
`
`Black, Harold N. and Hower, Wayne E.: “Advantageous
`Use of Potassium Chloride Water for Fracturing Water
`Sensitive Formations”, paper 851-39-F presented at
`Mid-Continent District Meeting, API Div. of Produc-
`tion, Wichita, Kans., March 31-April 2, 1965.
`
`BIaster's Handbook (du Pont), Sesquicentennial ed., 49
`and 443.
`
`Boardman, C. R., Rabb, D. D. and McArthur, R. D.:
`“Contained Nuclear Detonations
`in Four Media—
`
`Geologic Factors in Cavity and Chimney Formation”,
`Engineering with Nuclear Explosives, USAEC TID
`7695 (1964) 109-126.
`
`Boardman, C. R., Rabb, D. D. and McArthur, R. D.:
`Report UCRL 7350, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory,
`Livermore, Calif.
`(May, 1963); “Characteristic Effects
`of Contained Nuclear Explosives for Mining Applica-
`tion”, Rev. I, UCRL 7350 (Sept., 1963).
`
`Boriskie, R. J .: “An Investigation of Productivity Increases
`from Hydraulic Fracturing Treatments”, MS thesis,
`Texas A&M U., College Station (Aug., 1963).
`
`Brown, J. L. and Landers, Mary M.: U. S. Patent No.
`2,779,735 (April 18, 1956).
`
`Brown, R. W., Neill, G. H. and Loper, R. G.: “Factors
`Influencing Optimum Ball Sealer Performance", J. Pet.
`Tech. (April, 1963) 450-454.
`
`Campbell, I. B.: “The Effect of Fracturing on Ultimate
`'Recovery”, paper 851-31-L presented at
`the Mid-
`Continent District Meeting, API Div. of Production,
`Tulsa, Okla., April 10-12, 1957.
`
`“Can Underground Blast Make Shale Oil?’’, Oil and Gas J.
`(Jan. 12, 1959) LVII, No. 2, 58.
`
`Card, David C., Jr.: “Review of Fracturing Theories”,
`UCRL 13040, Colorado School of Mines Research
`Foundation, Inc., Golden, Colo. (April 16, 1962) 14-20.
`
`Ca_rman, P. C.: Trans., Inst. Chem. Eng., London (1937)
`15, 150.
`
`Cauthen, L. J., Jr.: “Survey of Shock Damage to Surface
`Facilities and Drilled Holes Resulting from Under-
`ground Nuclear Detonations”, Report UCRL 7694,
`Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif. (July,
`1964).
`
`Churchill, R. V.: Modern Operational Mathematics in
`Engineering, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York
`(1944) 107, 111.
`
`Clark, J. B.: “A Hydraulic Process for Increasing the Pro-
`ductivity of Wells”, Trans., AIME (1949) 186, 1-8.
`
`Clark, J. B., Fast, C. R. and Howard, G. C.: “A Multiple-
`Fracturing Process for Increasing Productivity of Wells”,
`Drill. and Prod. Prac., API (1952) 104.
`
`Clark, R. C., Freedman, H. G., Bolstead, J. H. and Coffer,
`H. F.: “Application of Hydraulic Fracturing to the
`Stimulation of Oil and Gas Production”, Drill. and
`Prod. Prac., API (1953) 113.
`
`Coburn, R. W.: “Custom Designed Well Stimulation”, Oil
`and Gas]. (March 4, 1957) 102.
`
`Coffer, H. F., Bray, B. G., Knutson, C. F. and Rawson,
`D. E.: “Effects of Nuclear Explosions on Oil Reservoir
`Stimulation’-’, J. Pet. Tech. (May, 1964) 473-480.
`
`Coffer, H. F., Bray, B. G. and Knutson, C. F.: “Applica-
`tions of Nuclear Explosives”, paper 851-40-E presented
`Diameters”, Engineering with Nuclear Explosives,
`USAEC TID 7695 (1964) 269-288.
`
`Bray, B. G., Knutson, C. F., Wahl, H. A. and Dew, J. N.:
`“Economics of Contained Nuclear Explosions Applied
`to Petroleum Reservoir Stimulation”, J. Pet. Tech. (0ct.,
`1965) 1145-1152.
`
`Coffer, H. F. and Aronson, H. H.: “Commercial Applica-
`tions of Nuclear Explosives”, paper 851-40-E presented
`at Mid-Continent District Meeting, API Div. of Pro-
`duction, Tulsa, Okla. March 30-April 1, 1966.
`
`Page 6 of 10
`Page 6 of 10
`
`

`
`‘ZOO
`
`;Cottrell, A. H.: Theoretical Aspects of Fracture in Frac-
`ture: Averbach, B. L. et al., Eds., Technology Press and
`John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1959).
`Coulter, A. W. and David, H. E.: “Fracturing Fluids and
`Additives”, unpublished report, Dowell Div. of Dow
`Chemical Co. (Jan., 1967).
`
`Craft, B. C., Holden, W. R. and Graves, E. D., Jr.: Well
`Design: Drilling and Production, Prentice-Hall,
`Inc.,
`Englewood, Cliffs, N. J. (1962) 494.
`Crawford, P. B. and Collins, R. E.: “Estimated Effect of
`Vertical Fractures on Secondary Recovery”, Trans.,,
`AIME (1954) 201, 192-196.
`
`Crawford, P. B. and Landrum, B. L.: “Effect of Unsym-
`metrical Vertical Fractures on Production Capacity”,
`Trans., AIME (1955) 204, 251-254.
`
`I...: “Estimated Effect
`Crawford, P. B. and Landrum, B.
`of Horizontal Fractures on Production Capacity". paper
`414-G presented at
`the Annual Fall Meeting of
`the
`Petroleum Branch of AIME, San Antonio, Tex.. Oct. 17-
`20, 1954.
`
`Crawford, P. B., Pinson, J. M., Simmons, J. and Landrum,
`B. L.: “Sweep Efliciencies of Vertically Fractured Five-
`Spot Pattern”, Pet. Eng. (March, 1956) B-95.
`
`Crittendon, B. C.: “The Mechanics of Design and Inter-
`pretation of Hydraulic Fracture Treatments”, J. Pet.
`Tech. (Oct., 1959) 21-29.
`Darcy, H.: Memoires a l’Academic des Sciences de l’Insti-
`tute imperial de France‘ (1858) 15, 141.
`
`Trans., AIME (1960) 219, 31-37.
`
`Darin, S. R. and Huitt, J. L.: “Effect of a Partial Mono-
`layer of Propping Agent on Fracture Flow Capacity”,
`Dickey, P. A. and Andersen, K. H.: “Behavior of Water
`Input Wells — Part 4”, Oil Weekly (Dec. 10, 1945).
`Durand, R.: “Basic Relationships of the Transportation of
`Solids in Pipes—Experiment Research”, Proc., Minne-
`sota Hydraulic Convention, Part I (1953).
`Dyes, A. B., Kemp, C. E. and Caudle, B. H.: “Effect of
`Fractures on Sweep-Out Pattern”, Trans., AIME (1958)
`213, 245-249.
`Essary, Roy L.: “Fracture Treatments in S.E. New Mexi-
`co”, World Oil (March, 1962) 99.
`
`Farris, R. F.: unpublished report, Pan American Petrole-
`um Corp., Tulsa, Okla. (1946).
`Fast, C. R., Flickinger, D. H. and Howard, G. C.: “Effect
`of Fracture-Formation Flow Capacity Contrast on Well
`Productivity", Drill. and Prod. Prac., API (1961) 145.
`Fast, C. R., Nabors, F. L. and Mase, G. D.: “Propping-
`Agent Spacer Effective in Gas-Well Fracturing”, Oil and
`Gas J. (Sept. 27, 1965) 97.
`
`Fenner, R.: “Untersuchung zur Erkenntnis des Gebirgs-
`drucks: Glueckauf” (Aug.-Sept., 1938).
`
`Flangas, W. G. and Rabb, D. D.: Report UCRL 6636,
`Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif.
`(Sept., 1961).
`
`Flickinger, D. H.: “Effect of Formation Damage During
`Fracturing on Well Productivity", unpublished report,
`Pan American Petroleum Corp., Tulsa, Okla. (June 18,
`1956).
`
`I
`
`..
`
`II
`
`I
`'
`
`I
`
`1
`
`'1
`
`I
`
`|
`l
`
`|
`
`|
`“
`1
`
`|
`'
`
`'
`|
`
`l
`
`1
`
`,
`
`I
`
`l
`
`I
`
`Flickinger, D. H. and Fast, C. R.: “The Engineering De-
`sign of Well Stimulation Treatments”, paper presented
`"at Annual Meeting of Petroleum Branch of the CIM,
`Edmonton, Alta., April 1-3, 1963.
`
`Foshee, W. C. and Hurst, R. E.: “Improvement of Well
`Stimulation Fluids by Including a Gas Phase”, J. Pet.
`Tech. (July, 1965) 768-772.
`
`Frac Guide Data Book, Dowell Div. of Dow Chemical Co.,
`Tulsa, Okla. (1965).
`
`“Fracturing: Big and Getting Bigger", Petroleum Week
`(May 13, 1955) 18.
`
`Frank, W. J.: “Characteristics of Nuclear Explosives”,
`Engineering with Nuclear Explosives, USAEC TID
`7675 (1964) 7-10; also Report UCRL 7870 (1964).
`
`Fraser, C. D. and Pettitt, B. E.: “Results of a Field Test
`to Determine the Type and Orientation of a Hydrauli-
`cally Induced Formation Fracture”, J. Pet. Tech. (May,
`1962) 463-466.
`
`Garland, T. M., Elliott, W. C., Jr., Dolan, Pat and Dobyns,
`R. P.: “Effects of Hydraulic Fracturing Upon Oil Re-
`covery from the Strawn and Cisco Formations in North
`Texas”, RI 5371, USBM (1957).
`
`Gevertz, Harry: “Project Gasbuggy—Fracturing with Nu-
`clear Explosive”, Bull., AAPG (1968).
`
`Ghauri, W. K.: “Results of Well Stimulation by Hydraulic
`Fracturing and High Rate Oil Backflush”, J. Pet. Tech.
`(June, 1960) 19-27.
`
`. Theory and Prac-
`.
`Gilbert, Bruce: “The F I Process .
`tice”, paper 1021-G presented at Fourth Annual Joint
`Meeting, Rocky Mountain Petroleum Sections of AIME,
`Denver, Colo., March 3-4, 1958.
`
`Gilman, J. J.: “Fracture”, Proc. Intl. Conference, Swamp-
`scott, Mass., M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1959) II,
`193.
`
`Gilman, J. J.: “Fracture in Solids”, Scientific American
`(Feb., 1960) CCII, 94.
`
`Gladfelter, R. E., Tracy, G. W. and Wilsey, L. E.: “Select-
`ing Wells Which Will Respond to Production-Stimula-
`tion Treatment”, Drill. and Prod. Prac., API (1955)
`117.
`
`Grant, B. F., Duvall, W. I., Obert, L., Rough, R. L. and
`Atchison, T. C.: “Research on Shooting Oil and Gas
`Wells”, Drill. and Prod. Prac., API (1950) 303.
`
`Gras, E. H.: “Hydraulic Fracturing Mechanical Equip-
`ment”, unpublished report, Halliburton Co. (Oct., 1966).
`Gray, D. H. and Rex, R. W.: “Formation Damage in Sand-
`stones Caused by Clay Dispersion and Migration“, Proc.,
`Fourteenth Annual National Conference on Clays and
`Clay Minerals (1965) 14.
`Grebe, J . J.: “Tools and Aims of Research”, Chem. and
`Eng. News (Dec. 10, 1943) 21, No. 23, 2004.
`Grebe, J. J. and Stosser, S. M.: “Increasing Crude Pro-
`duction 20,000,000 Barrels from Established Fields”.
`World Petroleum (Aug., 1935) 6, No. 8, 473.
`Griflith, A. A.: “The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in
`Solids”, Philos. Trans., Royal Soc. (1920) 221A, 163.
`Guerrero, E. T.: “Fracturing Can Help Secondary Recov-
`ery”, World Oil (July, 1958) 126.
`Page 7 of 10
`Page 7 of 10
`
`
`
`

`
`Guest, J. J.: Phil. Mag. (1900) 50, 69.
`
`Hall, C. D., Jr., and Dollarhide, F. E.: “Effects of Fractur-
`ing Fluid Velocity on Fluid-Loss Agent Performance”,
`J. Pet. Tech. (May, 1964) 555-560.
`
`Hartsock, J . H. and Slobod, R. L.: “The Effect of Mobility
`Ratio and Vertical Fractures on the Sweep Efficiency of
`a Five-Spot”, Prod. Monthly (Sept., 1961) 2.
`
`Hassebroek, W. E. and Waters, A. B.: “Advancements
`Through 15 Years of Fracturing”, J. Pet. Tech.
`(July,
`1964) 760-764.
`
`Hawsey, Jerry D., Whitesell, L. B. and Kepley, N. A.:
`“Injection of a Bactericide-Surfactant During Hydraulic
`Fracturing — A New Method of Corrosion Control”,
`paper SPE 978 presented at SPE 39th Annual Fall
`Meeting, Houston, Tex., Oct. 11-14, 1964.
`
`Hendrickson, A. R., Nesbitt, E. E. and Oaks, B. D.: “Soap-
`Oil Systems for Formation Fracturing”, Pet. Eng. (May,
`1957) B-58.
`
`Hendrickson, A. R. and Wieland, D. R.: “Personal Inter-
`view with R. C. Phillips, Union Oil Co. of California”,
`Dowell Div. of Dow Chemical Co., Tulsa, Okla. (July 5
`and 14, 1966).
`
`Hewitt, Charles H.: “Analytical Techniques for Recogniz-
`ing Water-Sensitive Reservoir Rocks”,
`J. Pet. Tech.
`(Aug., 1963) 813-818.
`
`Holzer, Fred: “Gasbuggy—Preliminary Post-Shot Sum-
`mary Report”, Report PNE 1003, Lawrence Radiation
`Laboratory, Livermore, Calif.
`
`201
`
`Huitt, J. L., McGlothin, B. B., Jr., and McDonald, J. F.:
`“The Propping of Fractures in Formations in Which
`Propping Sand Crushes”, Drill. and Prod. Prac., API
`(1959) 120.
`
`Huitt, J . L., Pekarek, J . L., Swift, V. N. and Strider, H. L.:
`“Mechanical Tool for Preparing a Well Bore for Hy-
`draulic Fracturing”, Drill. and Prod. Prac.,'API (1960)
`129.
`
`Hurst, W.: “Establishment of the Skin Effect and Its Im-
`pediment to Fluid-Flow Into a Well Bore”, Pet. Eng.
`(0ct., 1953) B-6.
`
`Jacob, C. E.: Trans., AGU, Part II (1940).
`
`Jaeger, J . C.: Elasticity, Fracture and Flow, 2nd ed., John
`Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1962) 208.
`
`Jaeger, J. C.: “Shear Failure of Anisotropic Rocks”, Geo-
`logic Magazine (1960) XCVII, 65-72.
`
`Jennings, E. R. and Vincent, R. P.: “A Glass Fabric-
`Plastic Liner Casing Repair Method”, Drill. and Prod.
`Prac., API (1959) 67.
`
`Johnson, G. W. and Violet, C. E.: “Phenomenology of
`Contained Nuclear Explosions”, Report UCRL 5124
`Rev.
`1, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore,
`Calif. (Dec., 1958).
`
`Jones, Frank O.: “Influence of Chemical Composition of
`Water on Clay Blocking”, J. Pet. Tech.
`(April, 1964)
`441-446.
`
`Jones, Frank O. and Fast, C. R.: U. S. Patent No. 3,179,173
`(April 20, 1965).
`
`Horner, D. R.: “Pressure Buildup in Wells”, Proc., Third
`World Pet. Cong., E. J. Brill, Leiden (1951) II.
`
`Kastrop, J . E.: “Newest Aid to Multi-Stage Fracturing”,
`Pet. Eng. (Dec., 1956) B-40.
`
`Howard, G. C.: “Evaluation of the Hydrafrac Process”,
`unpublished report, Pan American Petroleum Corp.,
`Tulsa, Okla. (1965).
`
`Howard, G. C.: “Special Fracturing Test, Pine Island
`Field, La.”, unpublished report, Pan American Petrole-
`um Corp., Tulsa, Okla. (1954).
`
`Howard, G. C. and Fast, C. R.: “Factors Controlling
`Fracture Extension", paper presented at
`the Spring
`Meeting of
`the Petroleum and Natural Gas Div. of
`‘ CIM, Edmonton, Alta., May, 1957.
`
`Howard, G. C. and Fast, C. R.: “Optimum Fluid Charac-
`teristics for Fracture Extension”, Drill. and Prod. Prac.,
`API (1957) 261.
`
`Howard, G. C. and Fast, C. R.: “Squeeze Cementing Op-
`erations”, Trans, AIME (1950) 189, 53-64.
`
`Kaufman, M. J.: “Well Stimulation by Fracturing”, Pet.
`Eng. (Sept., 1956) B-53.
`
`Kern, L. R., Perkins, T. K. and Wyant, R, E.: “Propping
`Fractures with Aluminum Particles”,
`J. Pet. Tech.
`(June, 1961) 583-589.
`
`Kern, L. R., Perkins, T. K. and Wyant, R. E.: “The
`Mechanics of Sand Movement
`in Fracturing”, Trans.,
`AIME (1959) 216, 403-405.
`
`Kirsch, G.: “Die Theorie der Elastizitat und die Bedurf-
`nisse der Festigkeitslehre”, Zeitschr. des Vereines Deut-
`scher Ingenieure (1898) XLII, N0. 29, 797.
`
`Knox, John A., Lasater, R. M. and Dill, W. R.: “A New
`Concept
`in Acidizing Utilizing Chemical Retardation”,
`paper SPE 975 presented at SPE 39th Annual Fall
`Meeting, Houston, Tex., Oct. 11-14, 1964.
`
`Howard, G. C., Flickinger, D. H., Fast, C. R. and Evans,
`R. B.: “Deriving Maximum Profit from Hydraulic Frac-
`turing”, Drill. and Prod. Prac., API (1958) 91.
`
`Lagrone, K. W. and Rasmussen, J. W.: “A New Develop-
`ment
`in Completion Methods — The Limited Entry
`Technique”, .7. Pet. Tech. (July, 1963) 695-702.
`
`Howard, G. C. and Scott, P. P., Jr.: “An Analysis and the
`Control of Lost Circulation”, Trans., AIME (1951)
`192, 171-182.
`
`Hubbert, M. K. and Willis, D. G.: “Mechanics of Hy-
`draulic Fracturing”, Trans., AIME (1957) 210, 153-166.
`
`Lamb, Horace: Hydrodynamics, 6th ed., Dover Publica-
`tions, New York (1945).
`
`Lamé and Clapeyron: “Memoire sur l’equilibre interieur
`des corps solides homogenes: Memoirs presents par
`divers savans" (1833) 4.
`
`Huitt, J. L. and McGlothin, B. B., Jr.: “The Propping of
`Fractures, in Formations Susceptible to Propping-Sand
`Embedment”, Drill. and Prod. Prac., API (1958) 115.
`
`.
`
`Landrum, B. L. and Crawford, P. B.: “Horizontal Frac-
`tures Do Affect Ultimate Recovery”, Per. Eng.
`(June,
`1961) B-80.
`,
`
`Page 8 of 10
`Page 8 of 10
`
`

`
`-..»...............m.............,..._,......u....<m.........,........-.......I...Z.......,‘,,...,,,;,..‘________MMN¢_
`
`1
`
`l
`
`Muskat, M.: Flow of Homogeneous Fluids Through
`Porous Media, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York
`(1937) 145.
`
`Muskat, M.: Physical Principles of Oil Production, Mc-
`Graw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York (1949) 242.
`
`Nadai, A.: Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids, 2nd
`ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York (1950) I,
`208, 340-343.
`
`Nathans, M. W. and Holzer, A.: “Shock-Induced Transi-
`tions—Sample History and Sample Recovery”, Report
`PNE-112F Part 1, AEC-UCRL (June, 1963).
`
`Neill, G. H., Brown, R. W. and Simmons, C. M.: “An
`Inexpensive Method of Multiple Fracturing”, Drill. and
`Prod. Prac., API (1957) 27.
`
`Neil], G. H., Dobbs, J. B., Pruitt, G. T. and Crawford,
`H. R.: “Field and Laboratory Results of Carbon Di-
`oxide and Nitrogen in Well Stimulation”, J. Pet. Tech.
`(March’, 1964) 243-248.
`
`1202
`
`1 %
`
`Lefkovits, H. C. and Matthews, C. S.: “Application of
`Decline Curves to Gravity-Drainage Reservoirs in the
`Stripper Stage”, Trans., AIME (1958) 213, 275-280.
`Lowe, D. K. and Huitt, J. L.: “Propping Agent Transport
`in Horizontal Fractures”, J. Pet. Tech.
`(June, 1966)
`753-764.
`
`Lowe, D. K., McGlothlin, B. B., Jr., and Huitt, J. L.: “A
`Computer Study of Horizontal Fracture Treatment De-
`sign”, J. Pet. Tech. (April, 1967) 559-569.
`Mallinger, M. A., Rixe, F. Hfiand Howard, G. C.: “De-
`velopment and Use of Propping Agent Spacers to In-
`crease Well Productivity”, Drill. and Prod. Prac., API
`(1964) 88.
`Maly, Joe W. and Morton, Tom E.: “Selection and Evalua-
`tion of Wells for Hydrafrac Treatment", Oil and Gas J.
`(May 3, 1951) No. 52, 126.
`Matthews, C. S.: “Analysis of Pressure Build-up and Flow
`Test Data”, J. Pet. Tech. (Sept., 1961) 862-870.
`
`Matthews, C. S., Brons, F. and Hazebroek, P.: “A Method
`for Determination of Average Pressure in a Bounded
`Reservoir", Trans., AIME (1954) 201, 182-191.
`
`Nikuradse, J.: Forsch, Gebiete Ingenieurw Forschungshef!
`(Sept.-Oct., 1932); reprinted in Pet. Eng.
`(1940) XI,
`Nos. 6, 8, 9, 11 and 12.
`
`McGlothlin, B. B., Jr.. and Huitt, J. L.: “Relation of For-
`mation Rock Strength to Propping Agent in Hydraulic
`Fracturing", J. Per. Tet-ii. (March, 1966) 377-384.
`
`Nordyke, M. D.: “Cratering Experience with Chemical
`and Nuclear Explosives”, Engineering with Nuclear Ex-
`plosives, USAEC TID 7695 (1964) 51-73.
`
`McGuire, W. J., Harrison, E. and Kieschnick, W. F.:
`“The Mechanics of Fracture Induction and Extension”,
`Trans., AIME (1954) 201, 252-263.
`
`McGuire, W. J. and Sikora, V. J .: “The Effect of Vertical
`Fractures on Well Productivity”, Trans., AIME (1960)
`219, 401-403.
`
`McLmno1'e, R. and Gray. K. B.: “The Mechanical Be-
`h:-woir of Anisotropic Sedimentary Rock", paper 66-
`Pet-?. presented at the l’ezroleun1 Mechanical Engineer-
`ing Conference, ASME, New Orleans, La., Sept. 18-21,
`1966.
`
`McLeod, H. O. and Coulter, A. W.: “The Use of Alcohol
`in Gas Well Stimulation”, paper SPE 1633 presented
`at SPE Third Annual Eastern Regional Meeting, Colum-
`bus, Ohio, Nov. 10-11, 1966.
`
`Mead, H.: “Another Concept for Final Buildup Pressure”,
`paper 1111-G presented at SPE 33rd Annual Fall Meet-
`ing, Houston, Tex., Oct. 5-8, 1958.
`
`Miles, A. J. and Topping, A. D.: “Stresses Around a Deep
`Well”, Trans., AIME (1949) 179, 186-191.
`
`Miller, C. C., Dyes, A. B. and Hutchinson, C. A., Jr.:
`“Estimation of Permeability and Reservoir Pressure from
`Bottom Hole Pressure Build-Up Characteristics”, Trans.,
`AIME (1950) 189, 91-104.
`
`Monaghan, P. H., Salathiel, R. A., Morgan, B. E. and
`Kaiser, A. P., Jr.: “Laboratory Studies of Formation
`Damage in Sands Containing Clays”, Trans., AIME
`(1959) 216, 209-215.
`
`Morrisson, T. E. and Henderson, J. H.: “Gravity Drain-
`age of Oil Into Large Horizontal Fractures”, Trans.,
`AIME (1960) 219, 7-15.
`
`in A-Bomb Grows, But. . .”, Pet. Week
`“Oil’s Interest
`(Sept. 26, 1958) 13.
`
`Orowan, E.: “Fatigue and Fracturing of Metals”, paper
`presented at M.I.T. Symposium, Boston, Mass., June,
`1950.
`
`Ousterhout, R. S. and Hall, C. D., Jr.: “Reduction of
`Friction Loss in Fracturing Operations”, J. Pet. Tech.
`(March, 1961) 217-222.
`
`Perkins, T. K. and Kern, L. R.: “Widths of Hydraulic
`Fractures”, J. Pet. Tech. (Sept., 1961) 937-949.
`
`Perry, J. H.: Chemical Engineers Handbook, McGraw-
`Hill Book Co., Inc., New York (1950) 1238-1240.
`
`Petroleum Production Handbook, Thomas C. Frick and R.
`William Taylor, Eds., McGraw-Hill Book Co.,
`Inc.,
`New York (1962) 2, 47.
`
`Phansalkar, A. K., Roebuck, A. H. and Scott, J. B.: U. S.
`Patent No. 3,046,222 (July 24, 1962).
`
`Pinson, J. M., Simmons, J., Landrum, B. L. and Crawford,
`P. B.: “Effect of Large Elliptical Fractures on Sweep
`Efiiciencies in Water Flooding or Fluid Injection Pro-
`grams”, Prod. Monthly (Nov., 1963) 20.
`
`Platt, George: “A Study of Transient Pressure Behavior
`in Porous Media”, unpublished MS thesis, U. of Tulsa,
`Tulsa, Okla. (1952).
`
`Powell, J . P. and Johnston, K. H.: “Waterflood Fracturing
`Pays Off”, IPAA Monthly (Oct., 1960) 22.
`
`Prats, M.: “Effect of Vertical Fractures on Reservoir Be-
`havoir—Incompressible Fluid Case”, Soc. Pet. Eng. J.
`(June, 1961) 105-118.
`
`W. B. and Juch, A. H.: “Pin-Point Sandfractur-
`Murphy,
`ing —— A Method of Simultaneous Injection Into Selected
`Sands”, J. Pet. Tech. (Nov., 1960) 21-24.
`
`“Project Gasbuggy—Feasibility Study”, El Paso Natural
`Gas Co., USAEC and USBM (May 14, 1965).
`Page 9 of 10
`Page 9 of 10
`
`
`

`
`“Project Rulison—New Try at Nuclear Stimulation”,
`World Oil (Sept., 1969) 67-71.
`
`Rabb, D. D.: “Large Borehole Drilling Cost”, Lawrence
`Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif.
`(to be pub-
`lished).
`
`Rawson, D. E.: “Review and Summary of Some Project
`Gnome Results”, Report UCRL 7166, Lawrence Radi-
`ation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif. (Dec., 1962).
`
`Rawson, D. E.: “Review and Summary of Some Project
`Gnome Results”, Trans., AGU (March, 1963).
`
`Rawson, D. E., Boardman, C. R. and Jafl°e, N.: “The En-
`vironment Created by a Nuclear Detonation in Salt”,
`Report PNE-l07F ABC (to be published).
`
`Reistle, C. E.: U. S. Patent No. 2,368,424 (Jan. 30, 1945).
`
`Reynolds, J. J., Popham, J. L., Scott, J. B. and Coffer,
`H. F.: “Hydraulic Fracture—Fie1d Test to Determine
`Areal Extent and Orientation”, J. Per. Tech.
`(April,
`1961) 371-376.
`
`Rixe, F. H.: “Review of Oil Well Fracturing Theories”,
`unpublished report, Pan American Petroleum Corp.
`(March 16, 1967).
`
`Rixe, F. H., Fast, C. R. and Howard, G. C.: “Selection of
`Propping Agents for Hydraulic Fracturing”, Drill. and
`Prod. Prac., API (1963) 138.
`
`Roberts, George, Jr.: “A Review of Hydraulic Fracturing
`and Its Effect on Exploration”, paper presented at
`AAPG Meeting, Wichita, Kans., Oct. 2, 1953.
`
`Root, R. L.: U. S. Patent No. 3,254,719 (June 7, 1966).
`
`“Rulis0n Goes off Without Hitch after Needless Delay”,
`Oil and Gas J. (Sept. 15, 1969) 40.
`
`“Rulison Nuclear Device Is Finally Detonated”, World
`Oil (Oct., 1969).
`
`Sallee, W. L. and Rugg, F. E.: “Artificial Formation Frac-
`turing in Southern Oklahoma and North Central Texas”,
`Pet. Eng. (Feb., 1954) B-75; and Bnll., AAPG (Nov.,
`_1953) 37, No. 1], 2539-2550.
`
`Scott, P. P., Jr., Bearden, W. G. and Howard, G. C.:
`“Rock Rupture as Affected by Fluid Properties”, 7‘rans..
`AIME (1953) 198, 111-124.
`
`S

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket