throbber
| ENTREPRENEUR OF THE YEAR
`NATIONAL WINNER
`
`Packers Plus
`Energy ServicesInc.
`
`DAN THEMIG, KEN PALTZAT, PETER KRABBEN
`
` being innovative. Andall of a sudden I
`
`With Packers Plus technology,
`the Bakkenoilfield wentfrom
`producing 100 barrelsofoil a
`day in 2006to 60,000 now.
`
`
`
`
`
`INJANUARY2000, Dan Themig, Ken Paltzat and Peter Krab-
`FPM: Whydid you and yourpartners decide to go out on your
`ben abandoned thesecurity of their jobsat oil-services giant Hal-
`own, to start your own business?
`liburton to start their own firm. Based in Calgary, Packers Plus
`THEMIG: Working for a large company has benefits and disad-
`Energy Services Inc. aimed to help the industry tackle the thorni-
`vantages. Most large companies are very rigid, siloed, whereas a
`est, hardest-to-reach deposits. Whena client from Texas presented
`smaller companytypically has morelatitude. When I was with
`the upstart with one such challenge in 2001, Themig
`{energy-services provider] Dresser In-
`used his time on a flight to a meeting to sketch out the
`dustries, it was a big company, but the
`
`idea for what would become Packers’ StackFrac system. > NO, OF EMPLOYEES IN 2000:3|divisions functioned more like small
`The technology unlocks previously unviable deposits,
`> 2009: ABOUT 350
`companies. I had planned to spend my
`maximizing production in mature oilfields and tight rock
`> NO. OF OPERATING
`career with Dresser. What caused the
`formations. Now, with the help of a partmer — interna-
`LOCATIONSIN 2000:1
`three ofus to leave was the mergerof
`tionaloilfield giant Schlumberger — Packers is rapidly
`> LOCATIONSIN 2009:25
`Dresser and Halliburton. All of a sud-
`expanding overseas. Here, founding partner and presi-
`den we moved to a company that was
`dent Dan Themigsharesthe story.
`completely structured. Throughout
`FINANCIAL POST MAGAZINE: What drew youto the oil-
`my career, I’ve always been a bit of a
`and-gas industry? You're a farm kid from southern Illi-
`renegade — looking for new ways to
`nois — notexactly oil country.
`do things — and I’d been rewarded for
`DAN THEMIG: My dad worked for Unocal’s pipeline
`division, but not in exploration. I didn’t know much
`about the oil-and-gas business until I graduated with a civil
`engineering degree from the University ofIllinois and got a job
`at Halliburton. I ended up in Texas for four years, then I talked
`my way into being transferred to Canada.I love to snowboard,
`ski, climb and whitewater-kayak, and they just don’t have many
`mountains in Texas. Also, the Canadianoilfields are known for
`fostering small companies and innovation. Someone once told
`methat at an oil-and-gas conference in Europe, the first thing
`[a presenter] said was, “If the technology isn’t born in Canada or
`Norway,it’s probably not worth talking about.”
`
`was working for a company that didn’t
`want you to do anything other than what you weretasked to do.
`Thatwaslike putting me in a cage and locking the door.
`FPM: Whatwere the early challengesin getting off the ground?
`THEMIG: The whole process wasreally scary. I’d only worked for
`two companies in my whole career. So starting a business of our
`own was like jumping off a cliff and hoping that the parachute
`would work. You're putting everything you haveatrisk. Doing that
`with Ken and Peter was good because I didn’t have all the skill
`sets to build this organization, andneither did Peter nor Ken, but
`together we had a good balance. Thethreeofus have transitioned
`
`42FPM DECEMBER 2009
`
`INTERVIEW BY JOANNA PACHNER >PHOTOGRAPHY BY COLIN Way
`
`1 of 2
`1 of 2
`
`Exhibit 2007
`Exhibit 2007
`IPR2016-01496
`IPR2016-01496
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`44.FPM DECEMBER 2009
`
`through a numberofroles at the companysince. I wasn’t president
`when westarted. But we’ve each picked a niche thatfits our skills.
`Becoming a managerwas tricky. I’d spent mycareerin sales, but
`by staying out of management, I watched and studied how others
`managed,andso figured outhow I’dlike to be managed.I want our
`managers to be doers, not controllers. When wehire people into
`managementpositions, thefirst thing we dois removeall their ideas
`about managing, because we don’t want to man-
`age by profit-and-loss statements. We manage by
`operational excellence and innovation. Wereally
`encourage our people to be innovative. I have to
`look on sometimesas peopletry things that] don’t
`think are goodideas, andsay, ‘I gotta let this guy
`try this because he might be on to something, and
`I don’t wantto shut down that commitment.’
`FPM:Did youstart with specific technology ideas,
`or were you just three guys looking to market
`your experierice and enthusiasm?
`THEMIG: We knew what we wanted to do. We
`wanted to innovate and to work in the high end
`of the market. We thought
`that even though our
`re-
`sources were very limited, if
`wefocused, we could become
`world-class at a couple of
`things. In fact, we created the
`StackFrac system because we
`got a request from a Houston
`firm that had heard aboutus.
`We had developed enough
`expertise in two years that
`we'd gained a reputation.
`FPM: How is your company’s solution different from alternatives?
`THEMIG: I can remembertelling my partners when we started, I
`don’t think we'll ever be set up in the U.S., a lot of the plays there
`are exhausted. And I’ve eaten those words a number of times. It
`goes to show that every time the end is near for the oil-and-gas
`industry, it finds new resources or a new wayof extracting old ones.
`And we've been right in the middle of those changes. We have
`four focus areas, and one of them is horizontal open-hole comple-
`tion. We developed a technique of using very inexpensive devices
`to divide up a horizontal well into segments and then individually
`fracture each of those segments. To put it in layman's terms,ifyou
`drill a mile down and a mile horizontally, we developed a way to
`divide that into 20 different segments, and to make each segment
`produce oil or gas.
`The Bakken formation in Saskatchewan really put that to the
`test. It’s a formation that people have drilled through for thelast
`40 yearsbut nobody had been able to make it produce in commer-
`cial volumes. They’d drill a mile through it, produce 30 barrels a
`day for a month,then it would produce five barrels a day, amounts
`that you couldn’t justify pumping. The industry first started to drill
`horizontal holes, which would produce 30 barrels a day long term,
`but these werefairly expensive to drill and weren’t economic at $40
`a barrel. When we came along, someofthefirst wells people tried
`
`us on ended up with initial production of almost 1,000 barrels a
`day. And even though the production would go down somewhat,
`the long-term economics werestill tremendous.
`FPM: Whydid you partner with Schlumberger?
`THEMIG: We formed an agreement with them to representus in-
`ternationally, because the international marketis very difficult for a
`smal] Canadian company. Hereand in the U.S.oil companieswill
`
`
`
`i O
`
`NE OF MY PROFESSORSTOLDME,‘BE
`A SAKS FIFTH AVENUE OR A WAL-MART.
`DON’T GET CAUGHT IN BETWEEN.’
`
`work with a small oil-services company, they’re savvy in deciding
`who’s bestfor a job. Internationally, it’s a differentstory. First, big
`foreign oil companieslike to deal with very large firms and limit
`the number ofcompanies they workwith. Plus there’s an issue with
`having to have agents abroad. Schlumbergeris the largest oil-ser-
`vices company in the world, with offices in every country where
`oil and gas activity exists, Our business volume internationally this
`yearis set to be up 50% by year-end.
`FPM: Your tight focus has been critical in your success. Do you
`think that’s importantforstart-ups in general?
`THEMIG: When I worked in Oklahoma,I picked up an MBA. One
`ofmyprofessors told me, ‘Either be a Saks Fifth Avenue or a Wal-
`Mart, don’t be caught in between.’ I told this to my guys before we
`even started: We’re goingto try to be Saks, The real gut check is
`that you have to be willing to walk away from some work. Early
`on, we had lots of opportunities thrown at us that were attractive,
`because we were short on cash flow and credit. But on thereally
`tough decisions I told my partners, ‘If you find it in the business
`plan, we'll doit. If it’s not there, we’re not.’ When youstart, you
`have very limited resources, so you only havetheability to produce
`10 widgets. If you dilute that by doing things that aren’t in your
`core focus, you'll only do twoorthree ofthe things you intended to
`do. Tolive your vision, you haveto stick to what you planned. FP
`
`PHOTOGRAPHYBYNICKWESTOVER
`
`2 of 2
`2 of 2
`
`eater a tem aT a3)
`
`
`
`INTERVIEWS
`BY MARK ANDERSON
`
`RyanBeedle
`
`THE BEEDIE GROUP
`
`EOY
`
`SINCE ACQUIRINGthe Beedie Group from his
`father a decade ago, Ryan Beedie has transformed
`the formerly small, but well-regarded, company
`into one of British Columbia’s largest industrial
`real-estate developers,
`increasing revenue by
`more than 500% in the process. Lately, the Beedie
`Group has branched out into Alberta, ex-
`panded into commercial and mixed-use de-
`velopment, and pioneered a numberofenvi-
`ronmentally friendly building practices.
`BUSINESS PHILOSOPHY: Treat everyone
`the same way, regardless of who they are.
`Satisfy and exceed the expectations ofcli-
`ents. There should never be any reserva-
`tions on anyone’s part about doing business with
`us. At the end of the day,it’s about our name, our
`brand and our reputation. Those are our most valuable assets.
`INNOVATION: We don’t believe in conventional wisdom, and we
`don’t acceptthe status quo. Peopletold us we werecrazy to try de-
`veloping industrial strata buildings (multi-tenant warehouse-type
`structures) with units in the 12,000- to 15,000-square-foot range,
`which is approximately 10 times the size of units in traditional
`strata buildings. We went ahead anyway, and the property sold out
`even before construction began. That's innovation on an industrial
`scale, creating a product type that didn’t exist before.
`BIGGEST LESSON: Always keep the middle man happy. Therela-
`tionship with those who bring business to us is of paramount im-
`portance, and we make sure they’re happy with what we're provid-
`ing. It’s all about incentives. ‘Treat people well and give them an
`incentive to want to come back and do business with us again. Be
`the best. Be the experts. Be the go-to guys.
`DARKEST HOUR:Frankly, we haven’t experienced one. Notin my
`memory.I’ve been runningthe business for close to a dozen years,
`and during that time we haven't really had any real down cycles,let
`
`> REVENUE GROWTH:500% OVER
`PAST DECADE
`
`> INNOVATION:
`INDUSTRIAL
`
`STRATA DEVELOPMENTS IN B.C.
`
`
`alone scary times. We’re going through what's supposed to be the
`worst recession in decades, and we've added more square footage
`to our portfolio this year than in any otheryearin ourhistory.
`AVOIDING TRAPS: Sometimes when you’re lookingat a deal, the
`entrepreneurial spirit kicks in and you wantto goafter it. At the
`sametime, though, you don’t wantto take unnecessary risks. You
`have to ask yourself, what are the consequences to the companyif
`the project fails? Deals are seldom as good as they appear on the
`surface, and you have to rememberthatit’s nota sprint, it’s a mara-
`thon. You never wantto risk your foundation.
`PROUDESTACHIEVEMENT: Winningthis award (laughs). Seriously,
`it’s been wonderful to win, and the impactit’s had on our organiza-
`tion and our partners can’t be overstated.
`DEFINITION OF SUCCESS:To me,it’s very personal. Everyone has
`different abilities, skills and desires. You can be successful even if
`you're not makinga lot ofmoney. Ifyou’re achieving personalgoals
`and know you're doing your best, ifyou’re happyand contributing
`to society in some meaningful way, that to meis success.
`
`DECEMBER 2009 FPM45
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket