throbber
Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
` DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS )
`CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG, )
` )
` Plaintiffs, )
` )
` v. ) C.A. No. 14-1043-RGA
` )
`BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,)
` )
` Defendant. )
`__________________________________)
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS )
`CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG, )
` )
` Plaintiffs, )
` )
` v. ) C.A. No. 14-1196-RGA
` )
`ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC., )
` )
` Defendant. )
`__________________________________)
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS )
`CORPORATION and NOVARTIS AG, )
` )
` Plaintiffs, )
` )
` v. ) C.A. No. 14-1289-RGA
` )
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., )
` )
` Defendant. )
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MARK J. RATAIN, M.D.
` Monday, April 11, 2016
` Chicago, Illinois
`Reporter by:
`Janice M. Kocek, CSR, CLR
`Job No. 105588
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`12
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`
`Page 2
`
` April 11, 2016
` 9:35 a.m.
`
` The videotaped deposition of MARK J.
`RATAIN, M.D., held at the offices of LATHAM &
`WATKINS, 330 North Wabash Avenue, Chicago,
`Illinois, pursuant to Notice,
`before Janice M. Kocek, a Certified Court
`Reporter, Certified LiveNote Reporter, a and a
`Notary Public of the State of Illinois.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2 3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
` Attorneys for Plaintiff Novartis
` Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis AG
` 1290 Avenue of the Americas
` New York, New York 10104
` BY: CHARLOTTE JACOBSEN, ESQ.
` SUSANNE FLANDERS, ESQ.
`
` GOODWIN PROCTER
` Attorneys for Defendant Roxane Laboratories, Inc.
` 620 Eighth Avenue
` New York, New York 10018
` BY: NAOMI BIRBACH, ESQ.
` (appeared telephonically)
`
` LATHAM & WATKINS
` Attorneys for Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
` 330 North Wabash Avenue
` Chicago, Illinois 60611
` BY: BRENDA DANEK, ESQ.
`
` ALSO PRESENT:
` RENATO VELARDE, Legal Video Specialist
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` M. RATAIN, M.D.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the start
`of DVD labeled Number 1 of the videotaped
`deposition of Mark J. Ratain, M.D., in the
`matter of Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`Corporation versus Breckenridge
`Pharmaceutical, Incorporated, Case Number
`14-1043-RGA; and Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`Corporation versus Roxane Laboratories,
`Incorporated, Case Number 14-1196-RGA;
`and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
`versus Par Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated,
`Case Number 14-1289-RGA in the United
`States District Court for the District of
`Delaware.
` This deposition is being held at
`Latham & Watkins, LLP, 330 North Wabash,
`Chicago, Illinois, on April 11, 2016, at
`approximately 9:35 a.m.
` My name is Renato Velarde. I'm the
`legal video specialist from TSG Reporting,
`Incorporated, headquartered at 747 Third
`Avenue, New York, New York. The court
`reporter is Janice Kocek in association
`with TSG Reporting.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`
`Page 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` M. RATAIN, M.D.
` Will counsel please introduce
` yourself?
` MS. JACOBSEN: Charlotte Jacobsen
` from Fitzpatrick on behalf of the
` plaintiffs; and with me is
` Susanne Flanders, also from Fitzpatrick.
` MS. DANEK: Brenda Danek from
` Latham & Watkins on behalf of Par.
` MS. BIRBACH: Naomi Birbach from
` Goodwin Procter on behalf of Roxane
` Laboratories.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court
` reporter please swear in the witness?
` (Witness sworn.)
`M A R K J. R A T A I N , M. D. ,
` called as a witness, having been duly
` sworn by a Notary Public, was examined
` and testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION BY
`MS. JACOBSEN:
` Q. Good morning.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. Can you state your full name for the
`record?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`
`Page 34
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` M. RATAIN, M.D.
`conducted by others that, by giving the drug
`over a prolonged period of time, would improve
`the efficacy of the drug, the therapeutic index
`of the drug.
` Q. What is the therapeutic index?
` A. The therapeutic index is the --
`conceptually, it's the efficacy versus the
`toxicity. In other words, so if the toxicity
`is worse than the efficacy, the drug doesn't
`have any therapeutic index at all.
` There are drugs with very narrow
`therapeutic index where there are doses that
`you can administer that are efficacious, but
`you have to be careful that they're very close
`to where you get unacceptable toxicity. And
`then there's other drugs that have -- what we
`say have a broad therapeutic index where you
`don't worry too much about precision in dosing.
`Because if you err on the high side or on the
`low side, the drug will still be safe and
`effective.
` Q. And so you were changing the
`administration of vinblastine to try and
`improve the therapeutic index; is that correct?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`
`Page 156
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` M. RATAIN, M.D.
` MS. DANEK: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: I can't agree with the
` generalization. I will agree with the
` specifics. So I will agree that there is
` confirmed clinical efficacy, but I can't
` agree that just because FDA has approved
` something that there is confirmed clinical
` efficacy since FDA uses an accelerated
` approval mechanism for some agents and some
` diseases and then requires confirmatory
` clinical trials thereafter.
`BY MS. JACOBSEN:
` Q. All right. So everolimus was the
`first mTOR inhibitor approved by the FDA for
`the treatment of advanced PNETs; is that
`correct?
` A. Yes.
` MS. DANEK: Objection. Form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MS. JACOBSEN:
` Q. Okay. And still today everolimus is
`the only mTOR inhibitor approved for the
`treatment of advanced PNETs?
` A. Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`
`Page 340
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` M. RATAIN, M.D.
`papers -- strike that.
` So you have not cited any papers
`describing the results of Phase III studies of
`temsirolimus, correct?
` A. To the best of my knowledge, Pfizer,
`Wyeth, whatever, did not pursue a Phase III
`study in neuroendocrine carcinoma.
` Q. And all of the temsirolimus
`papers -- I'm sorry. Strike that.
` All of the temsirolimus Phase II
`studies that you discuss in your reply report
`were single-arm studies, correct?
` A. No.
` Q. Which one was not?
` A. The Atkins paper.
` Q. Okay. Was the Chan study a
`single-arm study?
` A. I believe it was.
` Q. And was the Duran Phase II clinical
`study a single-arm study?
` A. Yes. That's why I wrote a letter to
`the editor.
` Q. Okay. And so they were not
`placebo-controlled trials, correct?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2026
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 8 of 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket