`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 60
`Entered: October 5, 2020
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC and WEST-WARD
`PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED n/k/a HIKMA
`PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS AG,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2016-014791
`Patent 9,006,224 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and
`KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CRUMBLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Settlement as to Petitioner Hikma Pharmaceuticals
`35 U.S.C. §§ 317; 37 C.F.R. § 47.74
`
`1 This proceeding as initially filed named Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. as the
`sole Petitioner. Argentum Pharmaceutical LLC was joined as a party to this
`proceeding via a Motion for Joinder in IPR2017-01063; West-Ward
`Pharmaceuticals International Limited was joined as a party via a Motion for
`Joinder in IPR2017-01078. Par subsequently requested termination of its
`participation in the proceeding pursuant to settlement, and we terminated the
`proceeding as between Par and Novartis. Papers 50, 52.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01479
`Patent 9,006,224 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to Board authorization, Petitioner Hikma Pharmaceuticals2
`and Patent Owner Novartis AG filed a Joint Motion to Terminate this inter
`partes review as to Hikma. Paper 57, “Mot.” The parties filed a copy of
`their Settlement Agreement, made in connection with the termination of
`these proceedings, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74. Ex. 2119. The parties also filed a Joint Motion to keep the
`Settlement Agreement confidential, along with a proposed Protective Order.3
`Paper 58; Ex. 2120. In particular, Hikma and Novartis request that the
`Settlement Agreement be maintained as viewable by the Board alone, and,
`thus, not accessible by Petitioner Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC. Paper 58
`at 2.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the
`merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” In this
`proceeding, the parties have settled their dispute, and the Board had not yet
`decided the merits of the parties’ dispute at the time the parties filed their
`
`
`2 West-Ward Pharmaceuticals International Limited updated its Mandatory
`Notices on January 8, 2019, notifying us that it changed its name to Hikma
`Pharmaceuticals International Limited. IPR2017-01078, Paper 11.
`3 The statute and our Rules permit a party to a settlement agreement to
`“request” that the agreement be treated as business confidential information.
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b); 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). A formal motion is not required,
`nor is a proposed protective order. For this reason, we deem the Joint
`Motion to keep the settlement agreement confidential (Paper 58) to be moot,
`but will treat the Motion as a “request” under the statute and our Rules.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01479
`Patent 9,006,224 B2
`
`Joint Motion. Given the joint request of the parties, we are required to
`terminate the review with respect to Hikma, as Petitioner.
`We also determine that the parties have complied with the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to have the Settlement Agreement
`treated as business confidential information and kept separate from the files
`of the patent at issue in this proceeding. Thus, we grant the parties’ request
`to treat the Settlement Agreement as business confidential, as well as
`keeping it designated as Board only.
`ORDER
`In light of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the joint request to treat the settlement agreement
`(Ex. 2119) as business confidential information is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit 2119 shall be maintained as
`Board only, kept separate from the patent file, and be made available only to
`Federal government agencies on written request, or to any person on
`showing of good cause;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate Hikma as a
`Petitioner (Paper 57) is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated as to Hikma
`Pharmaceuticals International Limited, but will continue as between
`Petitioner Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC and Novartis.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01479
`Patent 9,006,224 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Daniel Brown
`daniel.brown@lw.com
`
`Jon Strang
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Nicholas Kallas
`nkallas@fchs.com
`
`Raymond Mandra
`rmandra@fchs.com
`
`
`4
`
`