throbber

`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par V. Novartis. IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 33
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 33
`
`

`

`World Health Organization Classification of Tumours
`
`12::
`.73
`
`e 3
`
`International Agency for Research on Cancer (lARC)
`
`Pathology and Genetics of
`Tumours of Endocrine Organs
`
`Lyon, 2004
`
`Edited by
`
`Ronald A. DeLellis
`
`Ricardo V. Lloyd
`
`Philipp U. Heitz
`
`Charis Eng
`
`lARCPress
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 33
`
`

`

`World Health Organization Classification of Tumours
`
`Series Editors
`
`Paul Kleihues‘ MD.
`Leslie H. Sobin, M.D.
`
`Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs
`
`69008 Lyon, France
`
`Editors Ronald A DeLeilis, MD.
`Ricardo V, Lloyd. MD,
`Philipp U. Heitz. MD.
`Charis Eng, MD, PhD.
`
`Coordinating Editors Wojciech Biernat, MD.
`Janice Sych, PhD.
`
`Conlrol Number Editorial Assistants
`
`iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
`
`mm
`
`3"“‘W
`
`lsabelle Forcier
`
`xasggmsggigm
`
`Vanessa Meister
`Marlen Grassinger
`Sibylle sonng
`
`Illustrations Thomas Odin
`
`Primed by
`
`Team Rush
`89603 Villeurbanne, France
`
`Publisher
`
`iARCPress
`International Agency for
`Research on Cancer (lARC)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 3 of 33
`
`

`

`This volume was produced in collaboration with the
`
`International Academy of Pathology (IAP)
`
`in the List of Contributors on page 263
`
`The WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs
`presented in this book reflects the views of a Working Group that
`convened for an Editorial and Consensus Conference in Lyon, France,
`April 23—26, 2003
`
`Members of the Working Group are indicated
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 4 of 33
`
`

`

`Published by lARC Press. International Agency for Research on Cancer.
`150 cours Albert Thomas. F-69008 Lyon. France
`
`© international Agency for Research on Cancer. 2004
`
`Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in
`accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention.
`‘
`All rights reserved.
`
`The International Agency for Research on Cancer welcomes
`requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications. in part or in iuiir
`Requests for permission to reproduce figures or charts from this publication should be directed to
`the respective contributor (see section Source of Charts and Photographs).
`
`The designatiOns used and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the
`expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the
`World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country. territory. city.
`or area or of its authorities. or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
`
`The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers‘ products does not imply'
`that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in‘ preference to others
`of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted.
`the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
`
`The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication.
`
`Enquiries should be addressed to the
`Communications Unit. international Agency for Research on Cancer. 69008 Lyon. France.
`which will provide the latest information on any changes made to the text and plans for new editions.
`
`iSBN 92 832 2416 7 (NLM Classification: WJ TBO)
`
`1. Pituitary gland neoplasms ~ genetics 2. Pituitary gland neoplasms - pathology
`3. Thyroid neoplasms - genetics 4. Thyroid neoplasms. - pathology
`5. Endocrine pancreas neoplasms — genetics 6. Endocrine pancreas neoplasms - pathology
`* 7. Adrenal neoplasms — genetics 8. Adrenal neoplasms - pathology
`1. DeLellis Ronald A.
`II. Series
`
`Format for bibliographic citations:
`DeLeiiis RA. Lloyd R.V.. Heitz P.U.. Eng C. (Eds): World Health Organization
`Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs.
`IARC Press: Lyon 2004
`
`mm: Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
`
`Pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs /
`editors RA. DeLellis... [et ai.]
`
`(World Health Organization classification of tumours ‘. 8)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 5 of 33
`
`

`

`.
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`1
`
`.r
`
`_
`
`.
`
`_I
`
`1
`
`5.x
`
`.
`
`'
`_
`
`Thmours of the Endocrine Pancreas
`
`
`
`,.1
`rm .«1'
`H"
`
`a:
`
`_
`
`_
`-,
`
`I
`
`'
`
`_
`
`"
`
`Tumours of the endocrine pancreas are much less frequent
`than those of the exocrine pancreas and usually have a much
`better prognosis. Hormonesv'secreted by endocrine neoplasms
`include insulin, glucagonf‘ somatostatin. gastrin, vasoactive
`> intestinal polypeptide (VlP), pancreatic polypeptide (PP). sero-
`tonin, ACTH;»and calcitonin. Depending on the peptide hor-
`" . mones produced. they mayicausetdistinct clinical syndromes.
`including liie«threatening' hypoglyoaernla. gastric and/or duct;
`denal ulcers. or dehydration due to diarrhoea,
`'
`- Most pancreatic"neuroendocrine tumours can be surgically
`resected and'this leads to a rapid regression oi clinical’ symp-
`toms, Poorly differentiated neoplasms may be metastatic at the
`time of clinical presentation, and this is associated-with a poor
`prognosis.
`W
`Genetic susceptibility may play an important role. Up to 20% oi
`gastrinomas are associated with the inherited MEN-1 syn-
`drome?
`,
`V'
`
`.9,I“_‘g,“.4flaky,"
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 6 of 33
`
`

`

`Well»diflerentialed endocrine carcinoma
`Functioning
`
`Insulin'produclng (insulinoma)
`Glucagon-p-roducing‘(glucagonomn)
`Somalosmln-Pwducmg 15001310518000”)
`Gastrin-pFOdUCinQ 193317100013)
`VlP—producing (VIPoma)
`Serotonin producing with carcinuid syndrome
`ACTH producing with Cushing syndrome
`
`N0n~functioning
`
`Poorly-dilleremiaterl endocrine carcinoma —
`small cell carcinoma
`
`Mixed exocrine — endocrine carcinoma
`
`8150/3
`
`8151/3
`8152/3
`3155/3
`3153/3
`8155/3
`8241/3
`8150/3
`
`8150/3
`
`0041/3
`
`8154/3
`
`I Morphology coda oi
`
`the Inlernational Clasmlication of Diseases lor Unnnlugv (ICU-CI)
`
`(664) and the Systemalized Numenclalure 01 Medicine lnnpihsnomedorgl.
`
`WHO histological classification of tumours of the
`
`endocrine pancreas
`
`8150/11
`
`3151/1
`3152/1
`8156/1
`8153/1
`8155/1
`
`8150/0
`
`Non—functioning
`Microadenoma (<05 cm)
`Others
`
`Well~diflerenlialed endocrine tumour
`Functioning
`insulin-producing (insulinomal
`6|ucagon.pmduc.ng [giucagonoma)
`Somatostatin‘producing lsomatustatinoma)
`Gastrin-prodncing (gastrinoma)
`V|P~prodncing lVIPoma)
`Others
`
`Behaviour is coded /0 lor benign tumours, [3 lor malignanttumours, and /l for borderline or uncertain behaviour,
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 7 of 33
`
`

`

`Ensulinoma
`
`P. Komminoth
`
`A. Eerren
`K. Oberg
`
`G. Hindi
`Ph.U. Heitz
`G. Kipppel
`
`definition
`insulinoma is a functionally active and
`zinmonly benign endocrine tumour of
`a). panCreas with evidence of B-cell dif-
`lentialion and clinical symptoms of
`.xpoglycaemia due to inappropriate
`acretion of insulin
`
`iCD-O code
`.,-:.ulin producing tumour
`
`8151/1
`“sulin producing carcinoma
`8151/3
`
`Synonyms
`elated. but not universally applicable
`.irms for these tumours include “func-
`ainlng beta-cell
`tumour".
`"insulin pro—
`-iucing pancreatic endocrine tumour“ or
`nsulin producing islet cell tumour".
`Eymptoms of hypoglycaemia due to
`appropriate secretion of
`insulin were
`irst described by Harris in 1924 |836j
`‘ilid
`three years later
`the association
`between insulin secreting pancreatic
`-:ndocrine tumours and hypoglycaemia
`.ras reported by Wilder er al {2386].
`
`Epidemiology
`insulinomas are the most frequent of all
`aunctioning
`pancreatic
`endocrine
`tumours
`(see Pancreatic
`endocrine
`tumours) |1154j1874j The incidence of
`-nsulinoma was reported to be 2-4
`patients per million population per year
`il207,2012j.
`Insulinomas have been
`diagnosed in all age groups but rarely
`occur below the age of 15. The highest
`
`Fig. 4.10 Abdominal CT of a patient with a small
`insulinoma larrowl.
`
`categories: neurological symptoms and
`the autonomic nervous system response.
`The most Common and convincing
`symptoms result from neuroglucopenia,
`followed by the catecholamine response.
`Most prominent are symptoms of central
`nervous system dyslunction including
`dlplopia,
`blurred
`vision,
`contusion,
`abnormal behaviour and amnesia. Some
`patients may develop loss of conscious
`ness and coma or even permanent brain
`damage. Sometimes the patients also
`present with focal seizures. When trig—
`gered by hypoglycaemia the release of
`calecholamines
`produce
`symptoms
`such as sweating, weakness, hunger.
`tremor, nausea, anxiety and palpitation.
`These symptoms, although highly sug~
`gestive, are not pathognomonic for hypo»
`glyoaemia and a low blood glucose level
`must be demonstrated during their
`occurrence. The Whipple triad includes:
`(1) symptoms of hypoglycaemia.
`(2)
`
`183
`
`incidence is lound between 40-60 years.
`Approximately 10% oi
`the patients are
`younger than 20 years and 10% older
`than 60 [603.714.2011.2120j. Females
`seem to be slightly more frequently
`affected (1.5:1 ratio)
`in most reported
`series
`[682.714.729.12552011,2012.
`2295].
`
`Etiology
`The etiology and pathogenesis of insuli-
`nomas are unknown. No risk factors have
`been associated with these tumours.
`Embryologlcally. pancreatic
`tumours
`arise from similar precursor cells as pan-
`creatic islet cells which are derived from
`the endoderm [1253}. The results of a
`recent clonality study on pancreatic
`endocrine tumours are consistent with
`the hypothesis that these tumours prima‘
`rily might be polyclonal or oligocl'onal
`neoplasms which are eventually out-
`grown by a more aggressive cell clone
`that may give rise to invasive growth
`and/or metastasis [1724].
`
`Localization
`The majority of insulinomas are located in
`the pancreas or are directly attached to
`it. Ectopic (extrapancreatic) insulinomas
`with symptoms 01 hypoglycaemia are
`extremely rare (1.8%) and are most com-
`monly lound in
`the duodenal wall
`[627,2120l. Other
`reported locations
`include the ileum, jejunum, gastric wall,
`hilus oi
`the spleen, gastrosplenic liga-
`ment.
`lung. cervix and ovary [11.1075,
`1124.1714.2017.2036.2458j.
`Compiled data indicate that insulinomas
`are equally distributed between the
`head. body and tail of the pancreas with
`a slight predominance in the head and
`tail
`region
`[516.827.925.154221201.
`Approximately 85% of insulinomas ‘occur
`singly. 613% are multiple and 46% are
`associated with MENl {516,682,714,
`72912552011.2120.2295l.
`
`Clinical features
`Signs and symptoms
`Patients with insulinoma manifest symp-
`toms that can be grouped into two major
`
`Fig. 4.11 Octreoscan of a patient with an endocrine
`tumour of the ileum. Note paraaortal metastases
`(arrows) and iniraclavicular lymph node metas-
`tases (arrowhead). The latter were confirmed by
`cytology.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 8 of 33
`
`

`

`cells and proinsulin in the perinuclera
`
`Histopathology
`lnsulinomas exhibit four main histologica:
`patterns including a solid.
`trabeculas
`gland-like (tubular or acinar)
`tumOU'
`growth and mixed forms (858.1154;
`Larger tumours are encapsulated but tht
`capsule is usually incomplete. Smalle-
`tumours
`and microadenomas
`(set
`Nonfunctionlng tumours. microadenc-
`mas, others) are rarely encapsulated
`Tumour cells frequently exhibit a blantv
`cytology and cells with large. pleomor
`phic nuclei are rare. If present, these tee:
`tures are not predictive ol malignar
`behaviour. A relatively uncommon. bi.z
`characteristic finding in insulinomas t
`the deposition of amyloid. Its major con'
`ponenl
`is
`islet amyloid polypeptid:
`(lAPP) or amylin. that can be Visualizer
`by immunohistochemistry (2388}. Calc
`fications and inlracytoplasmatic pigmer;
`may rarely be seen in
`insulinoma:
`{957.2405}.
`
`"
`
`: “vi-‘75
`I.
`--~v, ~.,.~.
`W”. "(‘3'
`, 1;.
`-u
`
`" H
`
`lmmunohistochemistry
`Almost all insulinomas exhibit immunore
`activity lor
`insulin and proinsulin, The
`intensity and extent of this immunoreac
`tivity. however. does not correlate will
`circulating insulin levels. Strong positivit~
`for
`insulin at the secretory pole of
`in.
`
`184
`
`cystic changes are uncommon and most
`often restricted to large tumours.
`Insulinomas producing a hypoglycaemit-
`syndrome in MENi patients are usually
`larger than 1 cm, Microadenomas.
`'ie.
`tumours below 0.5 cm in diameter. with
`insulin expression. no matter how numer
`ous they are, seem to remain functionally
`silent [1114]. This implies that the insuli-
`nomas in MENi patients are among the
`grossly apparent and palpable pancreat-
`ic tumours.
`if
`there are several
`large
`tumours usually only one of them is an
`inaulinoma.
`
`Tumour spread and staging
`Malignant insulinomas may show gross
`local invasion of peripancreatic fatty tis-
`sue and/or adjacent organs such as the
`duodenum or the spleen. The first metas
`tases are usually found in regional lympl.
`nodes (peripancreatic, coeliac. perlaor»
`tic) and the liver. Spread to other distant
`sites is unusual. So far there is no staging
`system that specifically applies to insuli-
`nomas
`(see
`Pancreatic
`endocrine.
`tumours).
`
`Fig. 4.12 A Insulinoma. The tumour is small. sharply demarcated. B Malignant insulinoma invading the
`spleen. Numerous small liver metastases are present.
`
`from factitlous hyperinsulinaemia, In gen-
`eral. 80-85% of all insulinomas are diag—
`nosed
`by
`thesa measurements.
`Inappropriately high plasma insulin lev-
`els. during 48-72 hour lasting.
`is also
`regarded as a sensitive diagnostic test,
`Alternatively. C-peplide suppression is
`also a valuable screening or confirmato—
`ry test for insulinoma.
`
`Macroscopy
`Grossly.
`insulinomas are wall—circum-
`scribed tumours. softer
`than the sur—
`rounding pancreatic parenchyma and
`have. a red«brown cut surface. Tumours
`with abundant stroma or amyloid are
`firmer. insulinomas are trequently discov—
`ered while still small with 75% of
`the
`tumours measuring 0.5-2 cm in diameter
`and less than2 g in weight, The reported
`diameter ranges from O 541 cm {1154}.
`Tumour size is unrelated to severity of
`symptoms. Degenerative. necrotic and
`
`.
`_
`-: was“.
`I
`-
`'
`'
`f v it“!«My—3‘.
`Exam-u r» ~.,-_
`".t «L We"!
`.5: to ‘
`
`I1
`
`plasma glucose levels <3.0 mmol per
`hire; and (3)
`relief of symptoms with
`administration of glucose [16202010.
`2l20, 2497].
`
`Imaging
`Transabdominal ultrasonography yields
`a sensitivity of 20~65% in various series.
`CT scan 25-60%. angiography 35-75%.
`and lntraoperative ultrasonography 90-
`lOO%. More specific methods include
`octreoscan and PET~scan
`
`Diagnostic procedures
`Determination of plasma insulin and
`proinsulln concentrations by radioim-
`munoassay has greatly facilitated and
`simplified the diagnosis of
`insulinoma.
`Usually insulin. proinsulin, C-peptide and
`blood glucose are measured together to
`demonstrate an inappropriately high
`secretion of
`insulin in relation to blood
`glucose and to distinguish endogenous
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 9 of 33
`
`

`

`-.
`
`.
`
`.,
`
`185
`
`".
`2’
`-
`~
`.
`as?”
`L’
`'.-‘u~.w:s
`-
`.
`' a-
`Fig. 4.14 A lnsulinoma with trabeculer architecture. 8 Insulinoma. Strains-containing amyloid. c Amyloid Visualized by Congo red staining. D lnsulinoma, highly
`iifferentiated, trabecular architecture. Proinsulin localized to the paranuclear Golgi area. Antibody specific for proinsuiin. E Insulin predominantly localized at a
`cemetery pole of the tumour cells. F lnsulinoma with a trabecuiar growth pattern. Localization of insulin at the secretory pole of the tumour cells and partly within
`he cytOplasm. Antibody to insulin. 6 mHNA for insulin visualized by in-situ hybridization. H Proinsuiin is partly located in the paranuclear Golgi area but also in the
`cytoplasm and at the secretory pole of the tumour cells Proinsulin is secreted together with insulin in these tumours. Antibody specific for proinsulin.
`l Insulin is
`'zicalized within the entire cytoplasm and at the secretory pole of the cells.
`
`- :gion, is. the Golgi region can be seen
`.1 some highly differentiated insulinomas.
`-.lore often. however. an abnormal stain-
`lg pattern for insulin and proinsulin is
`riund [1871,1872]. About 50% of insuli-
`iomas
`are multihormonal.
`In
`such
`"Irnours
`insulin
`positive
`cells
`are
`admixed with cells expressing glucagcn.
`:omatostatin, pancreatic polypeptide or
`other hormones [1154}.
`
`immunohistochemical
`iseful additional
`‘narkers for the classification of insulino~
`I'ias are MlB-t
`(to assess proliferation
`'idex), CD31 (to visualize angioinvasion)
`ind somatostatin receptor subtypes
`1681].
`in cases with non-detectable
`.tsulin by immunohislochemistry in-situ
`‘ybridizalion may be helpful
`to identify
`.isulin mFtNA in tissue sections {2106}.
`
`Electron microscopy
`There are several classifications of insuli-
`nomas based on the ultrastructrural
`shape of their secretory granules 1174,
`429.430.2164}. However.
`as
`it has
`become more and more obvious that
`insulinomas are extremely heteroge-
`neous. containing poorly and well-granu-
`lated cells in the same tumour. the use of
`these classifications is limited. in a more
`recent study it was demonstrated that the
`pathophysiology of
`insulinomas is less
`likely caused by decreased storage
`capacity for insulin, as proposed earlier,
`than by impaired conversion of proinsulin
`to insulin [1873}.
`
`Precursor lesions
`No definite precursor lesion has been
`identified for insulinoma. Proliferation of B
`
`cells ([5 cell hyperplasla. nesidioblasto-
`sis),
`in patients with persistent hyperin-
`sulinaemic hypoglyoaemia cannot be
`considered a precursor lesion of insuli-
`noma because it is genetically different
`(2006i.
`
`v
`Histogenesis
`The histogenesis of insulinoma is uncer-
`tain {1835). Ductai proliferation may
`sometimes be associated with insulino-
`may, suggesting a potential duct cell ori—
`gin. Alternatively. an islet origin of B cell
`tumours is suggested by histology in
`MENt patients [2094] and is supported
`by observations that
`transgenic mice
`consistently developed islet B-cell hyper-
`plasia, dysplasia and insulihomas. in the
`absence of ductuloinsular proliferation
`[815.1834,1835,1837}.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 10 of 33
`
`

`

`emogfl
`
`a J, ’3’
`
`“ole "
`
`r
`
`’lp— 3p- 4+ 5+ 6q— 7+ 9p+9q+10-11p-11q—12+14q+17+18q-20q+
`
`Fig. 4.15 Summary of the results obtained by CGH analysis of insulinomas. Gains of chromosomal material
`mainly occur on chromosomes 5, 7, 9o, 14:] and 2th while losses are shown on ip, liq, 11 p and liq,
`
`Fig. 4.16 insulinoma. The proliferative index is less
`than 2 "/u. Antibody K'I-67,
`
`identified.
`
`Somatic genetics
`Compiled data from 43 analysed tumours
`indicate that as compared to other pan-
`creatic endocrine tumours.
`insulinomas
`exhibit fewer genomic alterations by CGH
`(see Pancreatic endocrine tumours)
`{2105,210712154. 2490].
`in particular,
`losses of 3p and other malignancy-asso-
`ciated alterations are rare. Losses of so
`and gains of 15q appear to be more tre—
`quently encountered in insulinomas than
`in the other pancreatic endocrine tumour
`types Gains of 9q34 and losses of 1p36
`and 11q appear to be early alterations
`already detectable in tumours smaller
`than 2 cm.
`Despite allelic losses of up to 40% at
`11q13 (the locus of MEN1). somatic
`mutations ol the MEN1 gene appear to
`be rare when compared to the other
`endocrine tumour types. They were iden-
`titled in only 7.7% (5/65) of sporadic
`insulinomas [750,879,153020182105,
`2350,2495l Somatic mutations in other
`genes such as Wit and CDKNZA/p 76
`are only occasionally encountered (1/22
`and 1/9) {1530.1531l.
`
`mas {113311901291}. Risk factors
`insulinomas that are not overtly malig»
`nant include: diameter larger than 2 on:
`high mitotic/MlBt
`index and necros:
`l899lJMalignant
`insulinomas contain a
`higher number of genetic alterations Thiil
`benign tumours
`:21062107], Furthe"
`more,
`it has been shown that losses t,
`chromosomes 3pq and so as well
`2‘.-
`gains of
`i7pq and 20q are associates
`with malignant behaviour {2107]. Th
`involved genes. however. remain to t:
`
`from MEN 1 {2012} Between 10 and 30%
`of the pancreatic endocrine tumours in
`MEN1 patients are associated with
`symptoms of hypoglycaemia due to
`inappropriate insulin secretion 1757.
`1154.1989]. Between 12 and 17% of VHL
`patients develop pancreatic endocrine
`tumours which may show focal
`insulin
`immunoreactivity {1857}. However. most
`of these tumours are clinically non-func-
`troning.
`
`Prognosis and predictive factors
`In contrast to the other types of pancre»
`atic endocrine tumours, the vast majority
`of insulinomas are benign at the time of
`diagnosis [2094]. This may be due in
`part
`to their early detection as they
`already become symptomatic when still
`small {1113,2092}. The percentage of
`malignant
`insulinoma ranges from 2.4-
`179 % with an average of 8.4 % [682.
`714,729,125520112092212022951.
`Malignant insulinomas occur in an older
`age group and are rare in children
`[426.2152l.
`it appears that males are
`more frequently aftected than lemales
`i449i,
`lnsulinomas of less than 2 cm in diame-
`ter without signs of angiolnvasion, gross
`invasion or metastases and showing a
`mitotic rate of <2 mitoses per 10 HPF or
`<2% Ki—67 (or MlBri) staining index are
`considered benign (macroadenomas)
`[2097] There are no immunohislochenii—
`cal markers available which reliably pre—
`dict the biological behaviour of insulino-
`
`Genetic susceptibility
`insulinoma is the second most frequent
`functioning enteropanoreatic tumour
`in
`MEN1 patients after gastrinoma. the lat-
`ter often arising in the duodenum 11250}.
`Rare examples ol insulinomas have also
`been described in patients suffering from
`NF1 l672l. Approximately 4 7% of unse»
`locted patients With insulinomas sutier
`
`186
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 11 of 33
`
`

`

`Glucagonoma
`
`G. Ktoppel
`P. Komminoth
`A. Perren
`
`K. Cberg
`X. Matias—Gum
`PhU. Heitz
`
`Definition
`‘1. glucagonoma is a tunctionally active
`tnd~usually malignant endocrine tumour
`.l the pancreas with evidence of A-cell
`:iiterentiation and clinical symptoms of
`v-ie glucagonoma syndrome. due to
`appropriate secretion of glucagon, and
`noiuding a skin rash (necrolytic migrato<
`/ erythema). stomatitis, mild diabetes
`-re|lilus and weight loss.
`"ancreatic endocrine tumours with A-cell
`:itferentiation but without a glucagono-
`ta syndrome should not be considered
`:lucagonomas. but non-functioning pan—
`reatic endocrine tumours.
`
`tCD—O code
`ilucagon producing tumour
`8152/1
`iiucagon productng carcinoma
`8152/3
`
`Epidemiology
`‘F-lucagonomas represent about 5% of all
`:tinically relevant pancreatic endocrine
`tumours and 843% of
`functioning
`:imours
`(see Pancreatic
`endocrine
`Himours) {2094]. The estimated inci-
`dence of the gtucagonoma syndrome is
`1 per 20 million per year [1771}. Patients
`most often present between the ages oi
`10-70 years (range 1972 years) and
`women are slightly more otten attected
`I 1885}.
`
`Etiology
`Jilucagonomas are occasionally part oi
`t-.-tEN1 [21122355],
`
`187
`
`Clinical teatures
`Signs and symptoms
`syndrome was
`The
`giucagonoma
`in 1974 [1397: but
`described in detail
`had already been observed in 1960
`l752i, The glucagonoma syndrome is
`thought to reflect the catabolic action oi
`excessively elevated glucagon levels
`[883.1397.1771l.
`The most common presenting teature of
`the glucagonoma syndrome is necro/yt/c
`migratory eryrhema found in about 70%
`of all patients. The rash usually starts in
`the groins
`and the perineum and
`migrates to the distal extremities The
`syndrome also includes mild glucose
`intolerance. normochromic normocytic
`anaemia. weight loss. depression. diar-
`rhoea and a tendency to develop deep
`vein thrOmbosis, The skin rash may be
`associated with angular stomatitis. cheili—
`tis. atrophic glossitis. alopecia, onycholy-
`sis. vulvovaginitis and urethritis. The
`cause of
`the rash is still unknown. A
`direct effect of glucagon on the skin,
`prostaglandin release, deficiency of
`amino acids. free fatty acids or zinc have
`been proposed as the underlying mech
`anisms. Marked weight
`loss occurs in
`around 65% at all patients and diabetes
`mellitus is seen in about 50% of
`all
`cases. Normochromic and normocytic
`anaemia occurs in about 1/3 of patients
`and is probably due to direct bone mar—
`row suppression by glucagon or to the
`deficiency of amino acids. Diarrhoea
`occurs In 1/5 of the cases as do psychi-
`atric disturbances. A tendency to venous
`thrombosis is
`increased, occurring in
`around 10-15% of all patients and may
`be life—threatening [53. 201.11852111}.
`
`Localization
`Glucagonomas commonly occur in the
`tail of the pancreas or attached to the
`pancreas {1885}. Extrapancreatic gluca-
`genomes are extremely rare [1852}.
`
`These tumours are usually large at diag—
`nosis unless they occur in patients with
`MEN 1. Somatostatin receptor scintigra~
`phy (octreoscan) is the most sensitive
`localization procedure and also an
`important method for staging of the dis»
`ease. Small tumours may be detected by
`endoscopic ultrasonography.
`
`Diagnostic procedures
`The diagnosis of glucagonoma is made
`on the basis of raised fasting plasma
`glucagon concentration together with
`demonstrable tumour and characteristic
`clinical
`features
`Fasting
`plasma
`glucagon concentration is usually elevat-
`ed 10 to 20 told; however.
`in some
`patients it may be only marginally so.
`Totbutamide or arginine stimulation tests
`may be used to confirm the diagnosis.
`Approximater
`1/5
`of glucagonoma
`patients also have raised tasting plasma
`gastrin concentration.
`
`Macroscopy
`large,
`Most gluca‘gonomas are rather
`solitary pancreatic tumours reaching up
`to 3.5 cm in greatest diameter. The mean
`diameter
`is
`approximately
`7
`cm
`{1885.2094l. The colour of the out sur-
`face is brown«red to pink. and the con-
`sistency is usually sott. Because of their
`large size. degenerative changes, such
`as haemorrhage. necrosis and cystic
`change are frequently seen in these
`tumours.
`
`"i9. 4.17 Glucagonoma syndrome: necrulytic migra-
`tory erythema. From E. Ruttman et al. {1885).
`
`Imaging
`Imaging procedures include helical CT,
`ultrasonography. MRI and somatostatin
`receptor scintigraphy and PET—scan.
`
`Fig. 4.18 Glucagonoma within the head oi the pan—
`creas. The tumour is sharply demarcated.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 12 of 33
`
`

`

`‘_
`t
`'7
`‘
`9'
`‘
`;
`.’ W/g
`'
`‘\
`-
`"Lu.
`1;“ ‘
`«£69: v2
`Fig. 4.19 A Glucagonoma with a trabecular architecture, 8 Glucagonoma. intense glucagun production by tumour cells.
`
`I
`
`I
`
`. P
`.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`..
`
`.
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`'-
`
`\—
`
`7'
`
`I
`
`mosomes 4,5,73,12,14,” and 20 while losses occur at 1p. 3p, 6c, 10, Hp & q.
`
`Prognosis and predictive factors
`Approximately 60-70% of glucagonoma
`are already metastatic at
`the time tn
`diagnosis l883.177i.1885}. Even am;
`glucagonomae are considered lumou‘
`of uncertain behaviour or well—differen‘
`ated
`endocrine
`carcinomas
`(SE
`Pancreatic endocrine tumours). Thee.
`tumours tend to grow slowly and patient
`may survive for many years.
`Occasionally.
`in multihormonal tumour.-
`the glucagonoma syndrome may i
`associated with. or followed by. anoth'
`syndrome. such as a hypoglycaem
`syndrome or VlPoma syndrome l33
`1640,2447}.
`
`,
`
`in
`
`k
`
`.
`
`Tumour spread and staging
`As in other endocrine tumours of the pan—
`creas. glucagonomas spread by local
`invasion into surrounding tissues and
`metastasize to the regional lymph nodes
`and the liver. So far there is no staging
`system that
`specifically applies
`to
`glucagonomas (see Pancreatic endo-
`Crine tumours).
`
`Histopathology
`The histological features of glucagono-
`mas do not differ
`fundamentally from
`those of other pancreatic endocrine
`tumours l230.1885.2094l. They do. how-
`ever. show a predominance of a mixed
`trabecuiar-soiid patterns. The tumour
`cells show faintly granular, often abun—
`dant cytoplasm.
`
`Immunohistochemistry
`Glucagonomas often stain weakly for
`glucagon. but also show reactivity for
`peptides derived from proglucagon (gly-
`centin. glucagonvlike peptides 1 and 2)
`[230.806.1885].
`in addition. numerous
`PP immunoreactive cells can often be
`identified. Mitoses are noted infrequently.
`
`Electron microsoopy
`Electron microscopically. glucagonomas
`Show atypical secretory granules {230,
`2355].
`
`Somatic genetics
`CGH reveals
`frequent chromosomal
`gains and losses involving different chro—
`mosomes. Only a small number of
`tumours (12) have been investigated.
`however, and the results may not be rep-
`resentative. The
`chromosomal
`loci
`involved are similar to those involved in
`non—functioning tumours. and gains of
`chromosome 7 are present in up to 80%
`
`188
`
`production seems to be uncommon i
`. pancreatic tum0urs occurring in patienzy
`with von Hippel—Lindau disease {1357},
`
`of cases l2105,2tO7.2154,2490l4 Using
`LOH analysis
`corresponding allelic
`imbalances
`have
`been
`described.
`though with higher frequencies of losses
`at 1p36. 3p25~26, 6q22. qu23 and
`ttq13l120.750.879l.
`Somatic MEN1 mutations were reported
`in 2 of 3 investigated tumours. No muta—
`tions could be identified in the genes
`VHL, PTEN, SDHD and DPC4 {3821721.
`1722].
`
`Genetic susceptibility
`Glucagon-immunoreactive tumours may
`occur in the setting of MENt {1114,1250
`1941],
`In a series of
`tOO pancreatic
`tumours in 28 patients with MEN1,37 dis—
`played glucagon immunoreactivity. and
`one
`patient
`presented with
`the
`glucagonoma
`syndrome
`{1250}.
`in
`MENl, these tumours tend to be multiple
`(59%) and benign (75%)
`[2089}. A
`glucagon-immunoreactive tumour was
`associated with familial adenomatous
`polyposls l2131l.
`in contrast. glucagon
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`mm
`
`ii
`
`7+ 9p+ 9q+ 10- 11p-11q~12+14q+17+18q-20q+
`4+ 5+ 6q-
`1p- 3p-
`Fig. 4.20 Analysis of genetic alterations of glucagonomas by CGH. Chromosomal gains are frequent on chr't
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2096
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 13 of 33
`
`

`

`Somatostatinoma
`
`Definition
`.A
`somatostatlnoma is a functionally
`rive and usually malignant endocrine
`t .mour with evidence of D—cell differenti-
`_t;on and clinical symptoms reflecting
`we diverse pathophysiologic effects of
`mronic
`inappropriate
`secretion
`of
`.-
`t .matostatin (hypersomatostatinemla:
`2matostatinoma syndrome). Extrapan-
`'zeath endocrine tumours such as those
`t
`~z the duodenum, lung, thyroid and para-
`..tnglra composed either exclusively or
`arredominantly of somatostatin immuno-
`. tacticve cells, but unassociated with the
`tlmatostatinoma
`syndrome
`should
`:erefore be more appropriately desig—
`nated
`as
`somatostatln
`producing
`endocrine tumours (or D-cell tumours).
`
`iCD-O code
`:7omatostatlnoma producing tumour
`8156/1
`Aomatostatinoma producing carcinoma
`8156/3
`
`Historical annotation
`:5somatostatinomas were independently
`described by Ganda et al. {687] and
`Larsson et a1. [1236}.
`
`Epidemiology
`Somatostatlnomas account for between
`i
`to 2% of endocrine tumours of the gas-
`troenteropancreaticohepatic
`(GEPH)
`axis. Duodenal somalostatln producing
`tumours appear to be as common as
`their pancreatic counterparts. Unlike
`other gastrointestinal and pancreatic
`endocrine tumours that may occur at any
`age. somatostatinomas generally arise in
`adults 25-85 years of age. The vast
`majority occur between the fourth and
`sixth decades and are twice as common
`in females as in males {464.2323}.
`
`Etiology
`While some somatostatlnomas are asso—
`ciated with NFi, MENl and Von Hippel-
`Lindau syndromes.
`the etiology of their
`sporadic counterparts is unclear. similar
`to that of endocrine tumours of the GEPH
`axrs.
`
`Clinical features
`Signs and symptoms
`The subtle and nonspecific somatosta‘tin-
`oma syndrome consists of markedly ele-
`vated somatostatin concentrations in
`plasma and/or tumour, diabetes mellitus
`of
`recent onset. hypochlorhydria. gall-
`bladder disease (cholelithlasis, suppres-
`sion of gallbladder motility), diarrhoea,
`steatorrhoea. anaemia and weight
`loss
`[1164]. Although each of
`these syn~
`drornic components can be due to the
`inhibitory effects of somatostatin on the
`secretory activity of various endocrine
`and exocrine cell types and the suppres-
`sion of gallbladder motility, the very exis-
`tence of the somato’statinoma syndrome
`has been questioned on the ground that
`these features are non—specific and very
`common in the older age group in which
`these tumours most often arise.
`
`189
`
`Localization
`Although somalostatinomas may arise
`anywhere within the pancreas, they are
`most commonly located in the head.
`
`Y, Dayal
`K. Oberg
`A. Perren
`P. Komminoth
`
`Imaging
`Uttrasonography is the most sensitive
`method to demonstrate somatostatlnd
`mas of
`the pancreas and duodenum.
`Extrapancreatic and metastatic lesions
`can be detected by ultrasonography, CT
`scan. and MRI. Somatostatin receptor
`scintigraphy and PET-scan have proven
`to be the most sensitive methods to
`demonstrate extrapancreatic and extra-
`duodenal somatostatlnomas.
`
`Diagnostic procedure
`The diagnosis is. confirmed by documen-
`tation of elevated plasma concentrations
`of somatostatin and the presence of the
`somatostatinoma syndrome.
`
`Macroscopy
`irrespective of whether they are pure or
`mixed, somatostatinomas Usually occur
`as solitary, well~circumscribed. but not
`encapsulated. soft. grey-white to yellow-
`tan tumours l2091l,
`that are generally
`large (average diameter 5-6 cm) by the
`time t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket