throbber

`
`Clinical Research 2: Novel Therapeutics and Biomarkers of Response
`
`Evaluation and development of an
`immunohistochemical procedure to monitor
`phospho-S6 as a biomarker for the activity of
`RAD001.
`
`Volume 65, Issue 9 Supplement, pp. 109-110
`American Association for Cancer Research
`
`
`
`AUTHOR INFORMATION
`
`1. Michael Stumm,
`2. Terence M. O’Reilly,
`3. Sabine Zumstein-Mecker,
`4. Caroline Fux,
`5. Maya Walker, and
`6. Heidi A. Lane
`
`1. Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
`Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 46, 2005
`
`Abstract
`
`469
`RAD001 is an orally active mTOR pathway inhibitor in clinical evaluation. The mTOR kinase
`regulates both S6 kinase (S6K) (a translational activator) and 4E-BP1 (a translational inhibitor), so
`that mTOR inhibition will disrupt the regulation of protein synthesis. In experimental and early clinical
`studies, RAD001 has demonstrated the inhibition of S6K-1 inhibition occurs in peripheral blood
`lymphocytes (PBL) and in various tissues, including tumors, and is well-aligned with the
`pharmacokinetics of RAD001. This suggests that S6K activity is a valuable marker for the activity of
`RAD001. As immunohistochemical (IHC) assays are broadly applicable, we sought to prepare a
`phospho-S6 protein (pS6) IHC assay for clinical use. A549 cell pellets or cytospin preparations from
`cells, with or without RAD001 exposure, demonstrated “on-off” staining with anti-pS6 antibodies
`which recognize distinct phosphorylated-epitopes (Ser 235/236 or Ser 240/246), reflecting the
`activated S6K pathway. Specificity of staining was confirmed by immunoblotting. CA20948 tumors
`from rats receiving an effective RAD001 treatment demonstrated the absence of pS6 staining as
`compared with vehicle-treatment (both Ser 235/236 or Ser 240/246). In addition, skin samples from
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2088
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`these rats showed marked reduction in pS6 staining. Phosphospecificity of the Ser 240/246 mAb
`was demonstrated by calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP) pretreatment of tissue sections yielding no
`staining. Furthermore storage of tissue sections at room temperature for 2 months markedly reduced
`immunoreactivity. IHC performed with A549 cells and patient-derived tumor material with different
`lots of Ser 240/246 indicated lot-specific intensity of immunoreactivity. Tissue microarrays of rat and
`mouse organs demonstrated pS6 detected by Ser 240/246 in various organs, notably the hair
`follicles where a response to RAD001 was clearly evident by IHC. Lastly a series of human breast
`and colon cancer samples showed the utility of IHC in detecting pS6. Hence, the development of the
`IHC method for following S6 phosphorylation changes in tumors and surrogate tissues provides a
`useful marker of RAD001 activity during clinical studies.
`
`• American Association for Cancer Research
`
`
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2088
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket