throbber
Digestion 2000;62(suppl 1):69–72
`
`OctreoTherTM: Ongoing Early Clinical
`Development of a Somatostatin-Receptor-
`Targeted Radionuclide Antineoplastic Therapy
`
`M. Charles Smitha Jingou Liua Tianling Chena Horst Schrana
`Ching-Ming Yeha François Jamarb Roelf Valkemac Willem Bakker c
`Larry Kvols d Eric Krenning c Stanislas Pauwels b
`
`aNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, N.J., USA; bCatholic University of Louvain, Brussels,
`Belgium; cUniversity Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands; dMoffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida,
`Tampa, Fla., USA
`
`Downloaded by:
`
`Key Words
`Breast cancer W Clinical studies W DOTATOC W
`Neuroendocrine tumors W OctreoTherTM W Peptide
`radiotherapy W Small cell lung cancer W
`Somatostatin receptor W Yttrium-90
`
`lung cancer. A fixed-dose regimen of 120 mCi/cycle ! 3
`cycles administered with concomitant amino acid infu-
`sion has been chosen for the study. Phase I data and pub-
`lished literature support that this fixed dose regimen will
`be safely tolerated.
`
`Copyright © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
`
`Abstract
`OctreoTherTM (90Y-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide, a.k.a.
`90Y-SMT 487) consists of a somatostatin peptide ana-
`logue (Tyr3-octreotide), coupled with a complexing moi-
`ety (DOTA), and labeled with a tightly bound beta-emit-
`ter (yttrium-90). By targeting somatostatin receptor-posi-
`tive tumors (as imaged by OctreaScan®) it may deliver a
`tumoricidal dose of radiation. Phase I clinical trials, con-
`ducted in patients with neuroendocrine tumors, estab-
`lished the safety and tolerability of the dose selected for
`further study and demonstrated the capacity of Oc-
`treoTher to deliver radiation doses to tumors that re-
`sulted in significant neuroendocrine tumor shrinkage.
`Novartis-sponsored phase II studies will soon begin to
`test the efficacy of OctreoTher in breast and small cell
`
`Introduction
`
`OctreoTherTM is a Novartis development compound
`currently in phase I multicenter clinical trials to test its
`potential as a somatostatin-receptor-targeted radionu-
`clide antineoplastic therapy. These studies are sponsored
`in cooperation with Mallinckrodt Medical Incorporated.
`The overall goal of this development program is to dem-
`onstrate the disappearance or significant shrinkage of
`somatostatin receptor positive solid tumors (e.g. neu-
`roendocrine, breast or small cell lung tumors) in the
`absence of clinically apparent toxicity to major organ sys-
`tems in patients receiving OctreoTher. Data from the
`Novartis-sponsored ongoing phase I study in neuroendo-
`
`ABC
`Fax + 41 61 306 12 34
`E-Mail karger@karger.ch
`www.karger.com
`
`© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
`0012–2823/00/0625–0069$17.50/0
`
`Accessible online at:
`www.karger.com/journals/dig
`
`Chuck Smith, MD, PhD
`Novartis Pharma Corp., Bldg. 419, Room 2306, 59 Route 10
`East Hanover, NJ 07936-1080 (USA)
`Tel. +1 973 781 8960, Fax +1 973 781 5511
`E-Mail chuck.smith@pharma.novartis.com
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2084
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`72.37.250.188 - 4/25/2017 3:01:08 PM
`Reprints Desk
`Downloaded by:
`
`crine tumor patients along with recently published clini-
`cal studies not sponsored by Novartis have provided sup-
`port for the choice of regimen to be tested in a multicent-
`er phase II study. This phase II study, to begin this year
`at 12 centers in Australia, the United States and Europe,
`will examine the safety and efficacy of the chosen regi-
`men in approximately 60 patients with breast and small
`cell lung cancer.
`
`Preclinical Rationale
`
`OctreoTher (90Y-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide, a.k.a.
`90Y-SMT 487) consists of a somatostatin peptide ana-
`logue (Tyr3-octreotide), coupled with a complexing moi-
`ety (DOTA), and labeled with a tightly bound beta-emit-
`ter (yttrium-90). By targeting somatostatin receptor-posi-
`tive tumors (as imaged by OctreoScan®) it may deliver a
`tumoricidal dose of radiation. Yttrium-90 (90Y) is a high-
`energy beta-emitter with a mean path length of 5 mm in
`tissue and a physical half-life of 64.1 h. SMT 487 binds
`with high affinity to somatostatin receptors (subtypes 2
`and 3) and retains both its binding properties and its
`physiological function when labeled with 90Y.
`The preclinical rationale for the use of OctreoTher is
`based on evidence that:
`(1) OctreoTher accumulates in somatostatin receptor-
`containing tissue or tumors.
`(2) Receptors remain present and able to bind Oc-
`treoTher during treatment.
`(3) Tumor regression was demonstrated in vivo [1].
`In tumor-bearing nude mice, OctreoTher was effective
`in somatostatin receptor-positive tumors, a single dose
`both shrinking the tumor and prolonging survival. A sin-
`gle dose in rats caused pancreatic tumors to disappear
`without regrowth. No difference in tumor regression was
`seen between perilesional, intraperitoneal or intravenous
`administration of OctreoTher, so the more convenient
`intravenous application was selected for clinical develop-
`ment.
`
`dose, plasma radioactivity is !1% of the injected dose/l).
`The rapid clearance of OctreoTher from the circulation
`gives this radiopharmaceutical a major advantage over
`radiolabeled antibodies, whose long plasma half-lives
`(several days) cause higher levels of whole-body irradia-
`tion. OctreoTher is not significantly taken into erythro-
`cytes. A correlation between creatinine clearance and
`total body radioactivity clearance was observed reflecting
`that the kidney is the principal drug eliminating organ
`and suggesting that OctreoTher is not recommended in
`subjects whose creatinine clearance is less than 40 ml/
`min. Radioactivity exposure was mainly to kidney,
`spleen, urinary bladder wall, and tumors. Gamma scin-
`tigraphy with 111In-pentetreotide (OctreoScan) may be
`used to identify OctreoTher-binding tumors. The relative
`biodistribution and pharmacokinetic profile of Octreo-
`Ther was not altered by changes in the absolute peptide
`dose over the range of 50–500 Ìg. Notably, concomitant
`administration of amino acids reduced renal radioactivity
`uptake without altering tumor uptake in a phase I study.
`Cationic amino acids appear to be responsible for the
`‘blocking’ of renal tubular uptake of proteins or peptides
`[2, 3]. A variety of other maneuvers have been attempted,
`so far, without success in further lowering the relative
`renal uptake of OctreoTher.
`Phase I clinical trial results support the safety and
`tolerability of the dose selected for further study. The
`organ of dose-limiting toxicity was confirmed to be pri-
`marily the kidney and secondarily the hematopoietic
`system. Acute radiation nephritis may appear as a syn-
`drome of hypertension, proteinuria and anemia present-
`ing up to a year after the causal radiation exposure [4].
`Furthermore, these studies demonstrated the capacity
`of OctreoTher to deliver radiation doses to tumors
`that resulted
`in significant neuroendocrine tumor
`shrinkage. The planned phase II study will assess the
`safety and anti-tumor activity of OctreoTher in refracto-
`ry small cell lung cancer and advanced metastatic breast
`cancer.
`
`Phase I Clinical Studies of Neuroendocrine
`Tumors
`
`Phase I clinical trials, conducted in patients with neu-
`roendocrine tumors, established that following an intra-
`venous infusion, plasma radioactivity disposition of
`OctreoTher was multiphasic (terminal t½ F8.6 h). Un-
`bound radioactivity was excreted in urine. By 24 h post-
`
`Planned Phase II Clinical Study of Small Cell
`Lung and Breast Cancers
`
`Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises approximate-
`ly 18% of all primary lung cancer, virtually all of the
`tumors bearing somatostatin receptors [5–8]. Although
`SCLC is highly sensitive to radiation, coexistent lung tis-
`sue damage and the early occurrence of distant metastases
`limit the utility of external beam irradiation. Resistance
`
`70
`
`Digestion 2000;62(suppl 1):69–72
`
`Smith/Liu/Chen/Schran/Yeh/Jamar/
`Valkema/Bakker/Kvols/Krenning/Pauwels
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2084
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`to chemotherapy often develops early during treatment.
`Prognosis is correspondingly poor; approximately 95% of
`those afflicted succumbing to their disease, regardless of
`therapy or earliness of diagnosis. Hence, OctreoTher, by
`providing systemic, yet targeted irradiation to metastatic
`SCLC, should provide a much-needed, additional thera-
`peutic modality.
`Breast cancer is the commonest malignancy among
`women. The prognosis is variable and first- and second-
`line therapies are well established. Approximately 70% of
`primary breast cancers express somatostatin receptors [5,
`9–11]. Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer,
`who are shown by OctreoScan to have high somatostatin
`receptor levels, may benefit from therapy.
`
`(1.84 m2) would correspond to a cumulative dose of ca.
`368 mCi per patient which was safe and tolerated. Some,
`but not all, of the administered cycles were in the presence
`of concomitant amino acid infusion. There was no adjust-
`ment for renal dosimetry, which was also not performed/
`reported. Four patients, who all received 17,400 MBq/
`m2, developed renal toxicity: 2 patients who received
`cumulative doses of 360 and 385 mCi, respectively,
`showed stable renal insufficiency; 2 other patients who
`received 380 and 410 mCi, respectively, showed complete
`renal failure (dialysis dependent). None of the 4 patients
`who developed renal toxicity received any concomitant
`amino acid infusion. Thus, all doses at or below 360 mCi
`administered with concomitant amino acids appear to
`have been tolerated safely.
`
`Primary Study Objectives
`
`Conclusion
`
`1 To evaluate the efficacy of OctreoTher in advanced
`metastatic breast cancer and refractory small cell lung
`cancer as measured by tumor response rate (PR + CR
`SWOG criteria).
`2 To evaluate the safety of OctreoTher as measured by
`the rate of (mild/moderate/severe/life-threatening) ad-
`verse events, and serious adverse events and the moni-
`toring of selected laboratory evaluations.
`
`Novartis-sponsored phase II studies will soon begin to
`test the efficacy of OctreoTher in breast and small cell
`lung cancer. A fixed-dose regimen of 120 mCi/cycle ! 3
`cycles administered with concomitant amino acid infu-
`sion has been chosen for the study. Phase I data and pub-
`lished literature support that this fixed dose regimen will
`be safely tolerated.
`
`Secondary Study Objectives
`
`1 To measure the overall survival of patients treated
`with OctreoTher.
`2 To evaluate the effect of OctreoTher on quality of life
`as measured by the EURO-QOL EQ-5D.
`3 To assess the frequency of tumors which are positive
`(tumor uptake 1 liver uptake) for OctreoScan within
`the screened population.
`
`Data from Non-Novartis-Sponsored Studies in
`the Literature
`
`Investigators not affiliated with Novartis have pro-
`duced and conducted clinical trials with a compound,
`which appears to be identical to OctreoTher, called
`Yttrium-90 DOTATOC [12–14]. To summarize the renal
`toxicity reported by these investigators, for purpose of
`comparison, 24 patients received ^7,400 MBq/m2. This
`limit (7,400 MBq/m2) corresponds to 200 mCi/m2, and,
`using the average reported BSA of these 24 patients
`
`72.37.250.188 - 4/25/2017 3:01:08 PM
`Reprints Desk
`Downloaded by:
`
`OctreoTherTM: Early Clinical Development
`
`Digestion 2000;62(suppl 1):69–72
`
`71
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2084
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`References
`
`1 Stolz B, Weckbecker G, Smith-Jones P, et
`al: The somatostatin receptor-targeted radio-
`[90YDOTA-D-Phe1,Tyr3]octreo-
`therapeutic
`tide (90Y-SMT 487) eradicates experimental rat
`pancreatic CA 20948 tumours. Eur J Nucl Med
`1998;25:668–674.
`2 Hammond PJ, Wade AF, Gwilliam ME, et al:
`Amino acid infusion blocks renal tubular up-
`take of an indium-labelled somatostatin ana-
`logue. Br J Cancer 1993;67:1437–1439.
`3 Mogensen CE, Solling K: Studies on renal tu-
`bular protein reabsorption: partial and near
`complete inhibition by certain amino acids.
`Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1977;37:477–486.
`4 Maher J: Section 6: Diseases of the kidney and
`urinary tract, Part 8: Radiation Nephropathy;
`in Masary SG, Glassock RJ (eds): Textbook of
`Nephrology. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins,
`1989.
`
`5 Krenning EP, Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH,
`et al: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with
`[111In-DPTA-D-Phe1]- and [123I-Tyr3]-octreo-
`tide: The Rotterdam experience with more
`than 1,000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med 1993;20:
`716–731.
`6 Kwekkeboom DJ, Kho GS, Lamberts SJ, et al:
`The value of octreotide scintigraphy in patients
`with lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 1994;21:
`1106–1113.
`7 O’Byrne KJ, Ennis JT, Freyne PJ, et al: Scinti-
`graphic imaging of small cell lung cancer with
`[111In]pentetreotide, a radiolabelled somatosta-
`tin analogue. Br J Cancer 1994;69:762–766.
`8 Bombardieri E, Crippa F, Cataldo I, et al:
`Somatostatin receptor imaging of small cell
`lung cancer by means of 111In-DPTA octreotide
`scintigraphy. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:184–
`188.
`9 Bootsma AH, van Eijck CHJ, Schouten KK, et
`al: Somatostatin receptor-positive primary
`breast tumors: Genetic, patient and tumor
`characteristics. Int J Cancer 1993;54:357–362.
`
`10 Van Eijck CHJ, Krenning EP, Bootsma A, et al:
`Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in primary
`breast cancer. Lancet 1994;343:640–643.
`11 Evans AA, Crook T, Laws SAM, et al: Analysis
`of somatostatin receptor subtype mRNA ex-
`pression in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer
`1997;75:798–803.
`12 Otte A, Herrmann R, Heppler A, et al:
`Yttrium-90 DOTATOC: First clinical results.
`Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:1439–1447.
`13 Otte A, Jermann E, Behe M, et al: DOTATOC:
`A powerful new tool for receptor-mediated ra-
`dionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:
`792–795.
`14 Otte A, Mueller-Brand J, Dellas S, et al:
`Yttrium-90-labelled somatostatin-analogue for
`cancer treatment. Lancet 1998;351:417.
`
`72.37.250.188 - 4/25/2017 3:01:08 PM
`Reprints Desk
`Downloaded by:
`
`72
`
`Digestion 2000;62(suppl 1):69–72
`
`Smith/Liu/Chen/Schran/Yeh/Jamar/
`Valkema/Bakker/Kvols/Krenning/Pauwels
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2084
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket