throbber
Chlorozocin
`A Diabetogenic Analogue of Streptozocin
`with Dissimilar Mechanisms of Action
`on Pancreatic Beta Cells
`
`BROOKE T. MOSSMAN, GLENN L. WILSON, AND JOHN E. CRAIGHEAD
`
`SUMMARY
`Chlorozotocin (chlorozocin, CLZ), the 2-chloroethyl an-
`alogue of streptozocin (STZ), was evaluated in three
`species of rodents. The drug is currently being used in
`phase II chemotherapeutic trials in man, and appears to
`be effective in the treatment of certain tumors. In our
`studies, hyperglycemia was induced in hamsters as
`early as 2 days after a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injec-
`tion of 30-60 mg/kg and was most striking at 4 days.
`Greater concentrations of CLZ (>50 mg/kg) were re-
`quired to produce hyperglycemia in CD-1 mice. Degran-
`ulation and necrosis of beta cells developed in ham-
`sters and mice, whereas alpha and acinar cells of the
`pancreas revealed no morphologic changes. Hypergly-
`cemia was not induced in rats at any concentration
`tested; however, animals showed abnormal carbohy-
`drate tolerance after administration of 100 mg/kg CLZ
`(LD50 dosage).
`The nature of damage by CLZ to beta cells was in-
`vestigated both in vivo and in vitro. Pretreatment of
`hamsters with nicotinamide (500 mg/kg, i.p.) failed to
`alter the extent of CLZ-induced beta cell injury and as-
`sociated hyperglycemia, but decreased the amount pf
`beta cell necrosis and hyperglycemia in animals receiv-
`ing STZ. The nonmetabolizable sugar, 3-O-methylglu-
`cose (3-0-MG), and 3-aminobenzamide, an inhibitor of
`the nuclear enzyme, polyADPribose synthetase, pre-
`vented STZ-associated damage to beta cells in islet cell
`cultures, but only 3-0-MG reduced CLZ-induced toxic-
`ity. Thus, in comparison to STZ, CLZ appears to be a
`diabetogenic agent with different species specificity
`and alternative mechanisms of cytotoxicity. The glu-
`cose moiety of both drugs appears critical in the induc-
`tion of beta cell damage. DIABETES 1985; 34:602-10.
`
`From the Department of Pathology, University of Vermont College of Medicine,
`Burlington. Vermont; and the Department of Anatomy, University of South Al-
`abama, Mobile, Alabama (G.L.W.).
`Address reprint requests to B. T. Mossman, Ph.D., Department of Pathology,
`University of Vermont, Medical Alumni Building. Burlington, Vermont 05405-
`0068.
`Received for publication 4 July 1984 and in revised form 16 November 1984
`
`Streptozocin (STZ), a nitrosourea linked to position
`
`C2 of D-glucose, exhibits selective toxicity for beta
`cells and is diabetogenic in laboratory animals (re-
`viewed in ref. 1). It is unclear why STZ shows a
`specificity for the beta cell, although the presence of the
`glucose moiety is thought to be important. Several experi-
`mental observations support this statement. For example,
`STZ-induced diabetogenicity is ameliorated when 3-O-meth-
`ylglucose (3-0-MG) or 2-deoxyglucose, nonmetabolized an-
`alogues of glucose, are administered to rodents.23 Large
`amounts of glucose also prevent hyperglycemia and necrosis
`of beta cells after injection into rats of either a- or p-anomers
`of STZ.3 When injected into rodents at equivalent concentra-
`tions, STZ is found in insular tissue at 3.8-fold higher amounts
`than methylnitrosourea (MNU), the non-glucose-containing
`form of STZ.4 These data suggest that the structural glucose
`renders N-nitroso compounds with a unique specificity for
`beta cells.
`This study was undertaken to determine whether another
`glucose-containing N-nitroso compound, chlorozocin (CLZ),
`a drug used in human cancer chemotherapy,5 was diabe-
`togenic in rodents (Figure 1). Moreover, we were interested
`in determining possible mechanisms of action of CLZ. Data
`presented here indicate that the interaction of CLZ with the
`DNA of the beta cell differs markedly from that observed with
`the classical diabetogenic agent, STZ.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Experimental protocol to evaluate the diabetogenicity of
`CLZ. Male golden Syrian hamsters (Bioresearch Institute,
`Cambridge, Massachusetts), CD-1 mice, and Sprague Daw-
`ley rats (both from Canadian Breeding Laboratories, St. Con-
`stant, Quebec) were used at 6-8 wk of age. Rodents (N =
`7-12 per treatment group) having free access to food and
`water were weighed before i.p. injection of CLZ (NSC
`#178248, the gift of Dr. Robert R. Engle, Developmental Ther-
`
`602
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 34, JUNE 1985
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`T. MOSSMAN, G. L. WILSON AND J. E. CRAIGHEAD
`ChUOH
`
`H
`
`OH \ OH
`
`O NO
`
`H
`
`NHC-N-CH2CH,CI
`
`Chlorozotocin (CLZ)
`
`CH2OH
`
`Histopathology. Randomized groups of rodents (N = 4-6)
`were killed on the second, fourth, and seventh days of the
`experiments. Other animals were killed either when moribund
`or after 4 wk. The liver, heart, kidneys, lung, gallbladder, and
`pancreas were fixed in Bouin's solution and 5 |xm histologic
`sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E).
`The pancreatic tissue was also examined by the peroxidase-
`antiperoxidase technique to evaluate insulin and glucagon
`in islet cells.7
`Islet cell cultures. Islets were isolated from the pancreata
`of neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats and prepared for culture
`as described previously.8 After an initial 16-h incubation in
`60-mm culture dishes to remove adherent fibroblastoid cells,
`suspensions of islet cells were plated into 16-mm culture
`wells (24 wells/plate). Twenty-four hours after plating, the
`monolayers were treated for 48 h with serum-free, cysteine-
`free medium to reduce contamination by fibroblastoid cells.9
`Thereafter, islet cells were maintained using Medium 199
`
`O H \ O H
`
`O NO
`NHC-N-CH3
`
`Streptozotocin (SZ)
`
`400.
`
`300.
`
`200.
`
`100.
`
`0
`
`A. 2 days
`
`//
`•
`0 20 30 40 50 60
`
`600.
`
`B. 4 days
`
`FIGURE 1. Structural formulas of chlorozocin (CLZ) and streptozocin
`(STZ).
`
`500 _
`
`400.
`
`300.
`
`200_
`
`100-
`
`0-
`
`! :
`
`4- •'•
`
`•
`
`'
`
`:
`
`.
`
`—1—II—1
`1
`20 30
`0
`
`1
`40
`
`1
`50
`
`1
`60
`
`500-
`
`C.
`
`7 days
`
`(50)
`
`400.
`
`300.
`
`200.
`
`100.
`
`(0)
`
`(0)
`
`:
`(0) 7.
`
`(66)
`
`(90)
`
`E oV
`
`)o
`
`o O o_
`
`o
`CD
`
`0
`
`—1—th
`0 20 30 40 50 60
`Chlorozotocin(mg/kg body weight)
`
`FIGURE 2. Nonfasting blood glucose concentrations in control and
`CLZ-treated hamsters bled at 2 (A), 4 (B), and 7 (C) days after injection.
`Numbers in parentheses in C represent the mortality (i.e., percentage
`of animals in each group) at 7 days.
`
`apeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment of the Na-
`tional Cancer Institute; 20-100 mg/kg) dissolved in a final
`volume of 0.1 ml dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Control animals
`received 0.1 ml DMSO alone. In comparative studies, ham-
`sters were administered nicotinamide (Sigma Chemical Co.,
`St. Louis, Missouri; 500 mg/kg)6 i.p. in 0.8% NaCI, pH 7.4,
`10 min before injection of either CLZ (40 mg/kg) or STZ
`(obtained from Dr. W. E. Dulin, Upjohn Research Laborato-
`ries, Kalamazoo, Michigan; 100 mg/kg, dissolved in 0.1 M
`citrate buffer, pH 4.4). Solutions for injection into animals were
`monitored spectrophotometrically at 232 nm to determine the
`stability of CLZ and STZ in DMSO and citrate buffer, re-
`spectively.
`All animals were bled at 2, 4, and 7 days after injection.
`In hamsters and mice, nonfasting blood glucose concentra-
`tions were determined on samples of whole blood from the
`orbital sinus. Because nonfasting blood glucose concentra-
`tions were not elevated in rats after injection of CLZ (20-100
`mg/kg), glucose tolerance tests also were performed on an-
`imals of this species. Rats were fasted overnight (12 h) at 4
`days after injection of CLZ and a blood sample obtained
`before i.p. injection in double-distilled H2O (0.1 ml) of 2 mg/
`g glucose. Blood glucose then was determined at 30, 60,
`and 120 min.
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 34, JUNE 1985
`
`603
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`changed at 48-h intervals thereafter, and the spent medium
`saved for determination of immunoreactive insulin (IRI).
`Radioimmunoassay for insulin. Insulin release during each
`48-h period was determined by a back-titration method10 us-
`ing 125l-labeled porcine insulin (Cambridge Medical Diag-
`nostics, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts) diluted with cold por-
`cine insulin (kindly provided by Dr. Ronald Chance, Eli Lilly
`and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana) and guinea pig anti-
`bovine insulin serum (Linco Research, Inc., Eureka, Mis-
`souri).
`
`RESULTS
`Blood glucose. Hamsters became hyperglycemic (defined
`as 150 mg glucose/dl) 2 days after injection of CLZ at con-
`centrations ranging from 30 to 60 mg/kg (Figure 2). The
`diabetogenic effect in the hamster was dosage dependent
`and was most pronounced 4 days after injection. Some an-
`imals failed to exhibit elevated concentrations of glucose in
`the blood even when higher dosages were administered.
`Death of some hyperglycemic animals was observed be-
`tween 4 and 7 days (Figure 2C). All of the hamsters exhibiting
`elevated blood glucose concentrations after the administra-
`tion of 50 and 60 mg/kg CLZ were dead at 7 days.
`Hyperglycemia was observed in only a few mice after in-
`jection of CLZ at doses > 50 mg/kg (Figure 3). All diabetic
`animals died between day 4, the time when hyperglycemia
`was most prominent, and day 7. In contrast, blood glucose
`concentrations in rats were normal at 2, 4, and 7 days after
`administration of CLZ (20-100 mg/kg, data not shown). The
`relative insensitivity of the rat to the drug was confirmed by
`glucose tolerance tests on day 4. Abnormal carbohydrate
`tolerance was observed only after injection of 100 mg/kg
`CLZ, the approximate LD50 dosage in this species (Figure 4).
`

`
`A
`
`^S
`
`CLZ
`100 mg/kg
`
`CLZ 80mg/kg
`CLZ 60mg/kg
`
`CONTROL
`
`200
`
`-
`
`150
`
`-
`
`100
`
`50
`
`-/
`
`10
`
`I*
`
`oo
`CO
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`60
`30
`0
`120
`Minutes After Injection of 2mg/gm Glucose
`
`1
`
`FIGURE 4. Carbohydrate tolerance in control and CLZ-treated rats. Four
`days after administration of CLZ, fasting rats were injected i.p. with 2
`mg/g glucose. Blood glucose concentrations were determined at time
`0 and 30, 60, and 120 min after injection of glucose.
`
`CHLOROZOCIN: A DIABETOGENIC ANALOGUE OF STREPTOZOCIN
`
`A.
`
`2 days
`
`500-
`
`400-
`
`300-
`
`200.
`
`100.
`
`*
`
`—i—if-
`0 20 30 40 50 60
`
`100
`
`B. 4 days
`
`••"
`
`-T-
`
`f*
`
`4.
`
`*.'
`
`1— 1
`—1—11—t
`1
`1
`20 30 40 50 60
`
`-ih
`
`1—"
`100
`
`C. 7
`
`days
`
`(10
`
`•:•
`
`::
`
`'
`
`( ~ }
`
`(7..0>
`
`'f
`
`(70)
`
`(70)
`
`0-
`
`500.
`
`400.
`
`300.
`
`200.
`
`100.
`
`o
`
`500.
`
`400-
`
`300-
`
`200-
`
`100-
`
`o 0
`
`)
`•<•
`
`ose o
`
`•oo
`&
`
`0-
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`11
`
`1
`
`ii- 1
`—1
`100
`20 30 40 50 60
`0
`Chlorozotocin (mg/kg body weight)
`
`FIGURE 3. Nonfasting blood glucose concentrations in control and
`CLZ-treated mice. All animals were bled at 2 (A), 4 (B), and 7 (C) days
`after injection. Numbers in parentheses in C represent the mortality
`(i.e., percentage of animals in each group) at 7 days.
`
`(Flow Laboratories, McLean, Virginia) supplemented with
`10% fetal bovine serum, glucose (300 mM/L), and genta-
`mycin (1 mM/L). Fresh medium was added at 48-h intervals,
`and the spent medium saved for determination of immuno-
`reactive insulin (IRI) concentration by radioimmunoassay.8
`On the eighth day of culture, STZ and CLZ, alone and with
`3-0-MG or 3-aminobenzarnide (3-AB) were added to the
`monoiayers. In brief, a 1 mM concentration of STZ or CLZ
`(Kodak Company, Rochester, New York) was prepared in
`Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) alone or containing the
`nonmetabolizable glucose analogue, 3-0-MG (Sigma), or the
`inhibitor of polyADPribose synthetase, 3-AB (Sigma). The
`STZ was initially dissolved in citrate buffer (pH 4.5) before
`dilution in HBSS, whereas CLZ was dissolved in DMSO. The
`culture medium was removed and the monoiayers washed
`two times with HBSS before exposure to drugs and their
`proposed inhibitors of action for 1 h. Control cultures received
`either 0.1% DMSO or citrate, or the drugs or the inhibitors
`alone. After 1 h, the test chemicals were removed, and the
`cultures replenished with fresh culture medium. Medium was
`
`604
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 34, JUNE 1985
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`acinar tissue was mildly congested and edematous. Mor-
`phologic changes were not found in alpha cells, and there
`was no evidence of degranulation.
`STZ (100 mg/kg) induced severe necrosis and degranu-
`lation of beta cells but had no apparent effect on alpha cells
`of the hamster (Figure 7, A-C). Beta cell degranulation was
`prominent in diabetic hamsters treated with STZ, whereas
`degranulation was less striking in CLZ-injected animals. Nic-
`otinamide prevented the necrosis of beta cells caused by
`STZ, although some degranulation still was evident (Figure
`7, D-F). In contrast, nicotinamide did not ameliorate CLZ-
`induced injury (Figure 7, G-l).
`Subtle cytologic changes were evident in the renal tubules
`of hamsters receiving 30 mg/kg of CLZ and frank epithelial
`necrosis was observed after injection of 50 mg/kg. Many of
`these animals had elevated concentrations of blood urea
`nitrogen, but creatinine was not increased. Focal myocardial
`necrosis and exudative interstitial pulmonary inflammation
`were'seen in animals receiving the higher dosages. Heart,
`lung, and kidney of mice and rats appeared to be more
`resistant to the cytotoxic effects of CLZ, but necrotizing renal
`tubular changes were observed in rats receiving 100 mg/kg
`CLZ. Although the cause of death in these rodents is un-
`certain, the lesions of renal tubules were doubtlessly signif-
`icant and are consistent with the findings of previous toxicity
`studies.11 In this regard, the nephrotoxicity of STZ12 and other
`nitrosoureas13 is well documented in humans. These drugs
`are eliminated by renal excretion.
`Effects of 3-0-MG and 3-AB on STZ- and CLZ-induced
`damage to cultures of beta cells. To determine whether the
`mechanism of cytotoxicity of CLZ is similar to that of the
`known beta cell toxin, STZ, monolayer cultures prepared from
`the islet cells of neonatal rats were exposed to the two drugs
`in combination with agents (3-0-MG and 3-AB) that are
`known to inhibit the effects of STZ on beta cells. The toxicity
`of CLZ could be blocked in part by the nonmetabolizable
`sugar 3-0-MG; however, greater concentrations (100 and
`150 mM) were required than were necessary to ameliorate
`the effects of STZ (Figure 8, A and B).
`The inhibitor of polyADPribose synthetase, 3-AB, pre-
`vented STZ-induced beta cell damage (Figure 9A) but was
`ineffective in reducing CLZ-induced toxicity (Figure 9B).
`
`TABLE 1
`Insular changes in animals receiving various "dosages of CLZ*
`
`CLZ
`(mg/kg)
`
`Days
`after
`inoculation
`
`Insular
`necrosis
`
`Beta cell
`degranulation
`
`±0
`
`00
`
`2 +
`2-3 +
`0-2 +
`
`2-4 +
`1 +
`0
`3 +
`2-3 +
`0-3 +
`
`00
`
`3
`3-4
`
`747477
`
`Mice
`
`Hamsters
`
`Rats
`
`100
`50
`25
`50
`40
`30
`50
`30
`
`Insular necrosis and degranulation of beta cells was graded using
`a 4-point ordinal scale in comparison with tissues from rodents re-
`ceiving 0.1 ml DMSO. Most severe alterations are scored 4 + ,
`whereas 0 indicates no change. A ± indicates equivalent positive
`and negative changes.
`
`B. T MOSSMAN. G L WILSON AND J E. CRAIGHEAD
`
`A
`
`A A4
`
`?
`
`A A
`
`
`
`* tAi
`
`J*
`
`0
`
`0 0
`
`0
`
`A. 7 dtyt
`
`*
`
`#
`
`500.
`
`400.
`
`300.
`
`200.
`
`100.
`
`0
`
`•D
`
`5C
`
`D 500-|
`
`SZ
`(100n>Q/kg)
`
`MC
`(soomg/kg) CLZ
`+
`(40mg/kg)
`(100mg/Kg)
`
`MC
`(5oo«ng/kg) Control
`+_
`(DMSO)
`(40mg/kg)
`
`FIGURE 5. Blood glucose concentrations at 2 (A), 4 (B), and 7 (C) days
`in control, STZ-, and CLZ-treated hamsters after pre-administration of
`nicotinamide. Numbers in parentheses in C represent the mortality (i.e.,
`percentage of animals in each group) at 7 days. No deaths occurred in
`control hamsters or in those administered nicotinamide and STZ.
`
`To determine whether preadministration of pyridine nu-
`cleotides5 prevents CLZ-induced diabetes, hamsters were
`administered nicotinamide (500 mg/kg) i.p. 10 min before
`injection of either CLZ (40 mg/kg) or STZ (100 mg/kg), the
`positive control for these experiments. Nicotinamide amelio-
`rated SZ-, but not CLZ-induced hyperglycemia at 2, 4, and
`7 days (Figure 5).
`Histopathology. Table 1 summarizes observations on the
`pancreata of animals receiving various dosages of CLZ. The
`extent of insular necrosis and degranulation of beta cells is
`expressed on an ordinal scale in which 0 indicates no alter-
`ation and 4+ denotes most severe changes. Rats failed to
`develop lesions of the islets, whereas insular changes were
`consistently observed in mice and hamsters injected with
`>50 mg/kg CLZ (Figure 6). The beta cells of these animals
`were often pyknotic, and the granules appeared to be
`clumped in the cytoplasm. Occasional cells were obviously
`necrotic and exhibited varying degrees of degranulation. In-
`flammation of the pancreata was not observed, although the
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 34, JUNE 1985
`
`605
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`CHLOROZOCIN: A DIABETOGENIC ANALOGUE OF STREPTOZOCIN
`
`* * • « •«
`
`v,v<* >-•/ •*;.
`
`«*.%r.-.V2*
`
`• «S ^'.is*-'
`
`Ar.J
`
`.«P^.
`
`FIGURE 6. Insular alterations in hamsters injected with CLZ (50 mg/kg, A-C, x 148) at 4 days postinjection. After administration of 30 mg/kg CLZ
`(D-F, x84), beta cells were affected less severely. Control hamsters receiving DMSO (G-l, x42) show no insular changes. In rats receiving 100
`mg/kg CLZ, islets appear distorted and filled with vacuolated cells (J-L, X140). Hematoxylin and eosin (A, D, G, and J). The peroxidase-anti-
`peroxidase technique for insulin (B, E, H, and K), and glucagon (C, F, I, and L) illustrates the affinity of CLZ for the beta cell.
`
`606
`
`DIABETES. VOL. 34. JUNE 1985
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`

`T MOSSMAN. G L WILSON AND J. E. CRAIGHEAD
`
`FIGURE 7. Morphologic damage to hamster beta cells by STZ (100 mg/kg) (A-C, x 140) is ameliorated after injection of nicotinamide (500 mg/kg),
`although degranulation of beta cells is still observed (D-F, x 148). In contrast, nicotinamide (500 mg/kg) does not prevent CLZ (40 mg/kg)-in-
`duced injury (G-l, x 100). All photographs were taken at 7 days after administration of drugs. Hematoxylin and eosin (A, D, and G), peroxidase-
`antiperoxidase technique for insulin (B, E, and H), and peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique for glucagon (C, F, and I).
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 34, JUNE 1985
`
`607
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 6 of 9
`
`

`

`A.
`
`48 hr
`
`B.
`
`• c
`E3 50mM 3-0-MG
`• SZ 1mM
`1! SZ + 50 mM 3-0-MG
`
`96 hr
`
`144 hr
`
`• c
`E33 150mM 3-0-MG
`•I CLZ 1mM
`• CLZ + 100mM 3-0-MG
`^ CLZ -I- 150mM 3-0-MG
`
`u ju
`* <
`
`3 00
`
`250
`
`UJ Qj 200
`
`UJ Z
`
`150
`
`"" 100
`U. </>
`oz
`
`50
`
`0
`
`48 hr
`
`96 hr
`
`144 hr
`
`FIGURE 8. Effect of 3-O-methylglucose (3-0-MG) on (A) STZ- and (B)
`CLZ-induced damage to beta cells in vitro. Immunologically reactive in-
`sulin (IRI) release by beta cells in culture (N = 6/group) was docu-
`mented at intervals (48, 96, and 144 h) after addition of STZ and CLZ
`for 1 h in HBSS alone and containing 50, 100, and 150 mM 3-0-MG.
`Culture medium was collected from individual wells before addition of
`chemicals (pretreatment controls) and at 48, 96, and 144 h thereafter.
`Results are expressed as a percentage (mean ± SEM) of the IRI re-
`leased in each culture dish during the 48-h period (pretreatment con-
`trol) immediately preceding exposure to the chemicals.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Importance of glucose in tropism of CLZ and STZ for beta
`cells. To determine why STZ has a specificity for beta cells,
`a variety of agents has been administered to rodents in at-
`tempts to block STZ-induced diabetes.1261415 Because non-
`metabolizable analogues of glucose alleviate diabetes
`caused by STZ,23 the "popular" school of thought suggests
`that the glucose moiety accounts for the beta cell tropism of
`the drug. We addressed this question using a structural an-
`alogue of STZ. Like STZ, CLZ contains glucose, a component
`of the compound that apparently renders it tropic for the beta
`cell. The simultaneous addition of 3-0-MG with STZ or CLZ
`to cultures prevents drug-associated toxicity, suggesting a
`critical role of the glucose moiety in interaction with beta-cells.
`Experiments conducted both in vivo and in vitro support this
`hypothesis. For example, the non-sugar-containing structural
`analogues of STZ and CLZ, i.e., methylnitrosourea (MNU)
`and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea
`(BCNU), respec-
`tively, are not diabetogenic when administered to golden
`Syrian hamsters (Mossman, Jean, Muir, Orfeo, and Wilson,
`manuscript in preparation). STZ and CLZ also prove to be
`selectively toxic to cultured beta cells, whereas MNU and
`BCNU are cytotoxic to beta cells and pancreatic fibroblasts
`at equimolar concentrations. Cytotoxicity in these cultures
`
`was determined both by phase microscopy and by quanti-
`tating release of insulin into the culture medium.816
`Several phenomena could explain a tropism of glucose-
`containing N-nitroso compounds for the beta cell. Assuming
`that the glucose moiety of CLZ and STZ binds to receptors
`on the plasma membrane of the beta cell, beta cells might
`possess an increased number of glucose receptors in com-
`parison with other cell types. Alternatively, glucose transport
`in beta cells might be facilitated via a Na"-dependent sym-
`port system.17 In contrast, uptake of glucose-containing N-
`nitroso compounds by "nontarget" cells might occur by pas-
`sive transport. For example, studies by Lam and colleagues
`show that uptake of CLZ by human lymphoblasts in vitro is
`a passive process.18
`Mechanisms of cytotoxicity at the molecular level. On the
`basis of their experimental results using STZ and alloxan,
`Yamamoto and colleagues propose a common mechanism
`for chemically induced diabetes.1921 After addition of dia-
`betogenic drugs to islets in vitro, single-strand breakage of
`DNA occurs either by direct interaction of chemicals with
`DNA or via reactions with oxygen-free radicals elicited by the
`compounds. The activation of polyADPribose synthetase, a
`nuclear enzyme using NAD as a substrate, then ensues. As
`a result, a significant reduction in insular concentrations of
`NAD is observed, a change that can be prevented by inhib-
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`<
`
`-I
`
`UJ UJ
`
`UJ Z
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`UJ 300
`< 250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`ujz
`
`U_ 0)
`°S
`
`50
`o
`
`• c
`M 100mM 3AB
`^ S Z 1 mM
`• SZ + 10mM 3AB
`• SZ + 50mM 3AB
`Eg SZ + 100mM 3AB
`
`1
`
`48 hr
`
`96 hr
`
`144 hr
`
`DC
`E3 100mM 3AB
`E3 CLZ 1mM
`• CLZ + 10mM 3AB
`m CLZ + 50mM 3AB
`Eg CLZ + 100mM3AB
`
`1
`
`1
`
`48 hr
`
`96 hr
`
`144 hr
`
`FIGURE 9. Effect of 3-aminobenzamide (3-AB) on (A) STZ- and (B) CLZ-
`induced damage to beta cells in vitro. The results are expressed as de-
`scribed in the legend to Figure 8.
`
`608
`
`DIABETES, VOL 34, JUNE 1985
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`

`B T. MOSSMAN. G L
`
`itors of polyADPribose synthetase, including nicotinamide
`and methylxanthines. These substances also prevent the de-
`velopment of STZ- and alloxan-induced diabetes in rats. Ya-
`mamoto's hypothesis is attractive, although a direct role of
`polyADPribose in beta cell injury and repair remains to be
`elucidated. Alternatively, our inability to show a protective
`effect of nicotinamide on CLZ-induced beta cell damage8
`and diabetes suggests that all diabetogenic chemicals do
`not act by this mechanism. The negative results obtained in
`vitro with use of 3-AB, another inhibitor of polyADPribose
`synthetase, supports our findings with nicotinamide. In recent
`work, we have shown that 3-AB also is a potent scavenger
`of the hydroxyl radical (OH").22 Thus, CLZ-induced injury to
`beta cells does not appear to be mediated by oxygen-free
`radicals, although some experimental studies suggest that
`active oxygen species are intrinsic to STZ-2324 and alloxan-
`associated diabetes.2526
`Species specificity of CLZ and STZ. In our studies, the
`susceptibility of three species of rodents to diabetogenic
`amounts of CLZ differed. Curiously, the order of susceptibility
`to CLZ was altered markedly from that reported for STZ.
`Hamsters were most susceptible to CLZ, followed by mice
`and rats. In contrast, the opposite pattern was observed with
`use of STZ. It is generally reported in the literature that 100-
`200 mg/kg STZ is required to produce overt diabetes in the
`hamster,2728 180-200 mg/kg is necessary for the mouse,2930
`and only 70-90 mg/kg is required for the rat.3132 Therefore,
`both hamsters and mice appear to be more sensitive to the
`diabetogenic effects of CLZ, while rats are exquisitely sen-
`sitive to STZ. Although rats injected with the drug are rela-
`tively resistant, a marked tropism of CLZ for rat beta cells in
`comparison with pancreatic fibroblasts can be demonstrated
`in vitro.8
`The studies described here were initiated to document the
`diabetogenicity of CLZ and compare its mode of action to
`that of STZ. The intriguing observations that CLZ-induced
`diabetes is not ameliorated by nicotinamide, that marked
`interspecies variation occurs in the response of rodents to
`CLZ in comparison with STZ, and the fact that, in comparison
`to STZ, CLZ does not appear to act through stimulation of
`polyADPribose synthetase or production of oxygen free rad-
`icals, suggest that CLZ and STZ may exert their effects on the
`beta cells via unrelated molecular mechanisms. Evidence
`presented here also supports the hypothesis that the pres-
`ence of glucose imparts a specificity of N-nitroso compounds
`for the beta cell of the pancreas. Although the intracellular
`stability of STZ and CLZ has not been studied in the beta
`cell, the spontaneous decomposition of STZ and CLZ under
`physiologic conditions (pH 7.4) is similar.33 Thus, it is im-
`probable that the contrasting biologic responses reported
`above are the result of differential breakdown of drugs.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`These studies were completed with the excellent technical
`assistance of Stephanie Bellomo, Joan Carrassi, Christopher
`Evans, Nancy Green, Nancy Patton, Perry Heffelfinger, and
`Julie Ruggeri.
`This study was supported by grant NIH PHS R23-25821
`from the NIAMDD, by grants NIH PHS RO1 ES03113 and
`
`ES03066 from NIEHS, and by grants from the Kroc Foun-
`dation and the American Diabetes Association.
`
`REFERENCES
`1 Byrne, P. J., and Schein, P. S.: Streptozotocin and Nitrosoureas: Cur-
`rent Status and New Developments. Prestayko, A. W., et al., Eds. New York,
`Academic Press, 1981:367-78.
`2 Rossini, A. A., Williams, R. M., Appel, M. C, and Like, A. A.: Complete
`protection from low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice. Nature
`1978; 76:182-84.
`3 Rossini, A. A., Like, A. A., Dulin, W. E., and Cahill, G. F: Pancreatic
`beta cell toxicity by streptozotocin anomers. Diabetes 1977; 26:1120-24.
`4 Anderson, T., Schein, P. S., McMenamin, M. G., and Cooney, D. A.:
`Streptozotocin diabetes: correlation with extent of depression of pancreatic
`islet nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. J. Clin. Invest. 1974; 54:672-77.
`5 Gralla, R. J., Tan, C. T. C, and Young, C. W.: Phase I trial of chloro-
`zotocin Cancer Treat. Rep. 1979; 63:17-20
`6 Schein, P. S., Cooney, D. A., and Vernon, M. L: The use of nicotinamide
`to modify the toxicity of streptozotocin diabetes without loss of antitumor ac-
`tivity. Cancer Res. 1967: 27:2324-32.
`'Wilson, G. L, Chick, W. L, and Appel, M. C: Pancreatic islet cell
`monolayer cultures: immunoperoxidase staining and autoradiography. TCA
`Manual 1979; 5:1193-97.
`• 8 Wilson, G. L., Mossman, B. T., and Craighead, J. E.: Use of pancreatic
`beta cells in culture to identify diabetogenic N-nitroso compounds. In Vitro
`1983; 19:25-30.
`9 Chick, W. L, King, D. L, and Lauris, V: Techniques for the preparation
`and maintenance of pancreatic beta cell monolayer cultures. In Pancreatic
`Beta Cell Culture Von Wasielewski, E., and Chick, W. L . Eds. Amsterdam-
`Oxford, Excerpta Medica, 1977:85-91
`10 Wright, P., Makulu, D. R., Vichick, D., and Sussman, K. E: Insulin
`immunoassay by back-titration: some characteristics of the technique and the
`insulin precipitant action of alcohol. Diabetes 1971: 20:33-45.
`"Report No. MRI-BTL-NCI-75-1-26, Clinical Drug Distribution Section.
`Drug Development Branch, D.C.T. N.C.I., November 1975.
`12duPriest, R. W, Jr., Huntington, M. M., Massey, W. H., Weiss. A. J.,
`Wilson, W. L., and Fletcher, W. S.: Streptozotocin therapy in 22 cancer patients.
`Cancer 1975; 35:358-67.
`'3 Schact, R. G., Geiner, H. D., Gallo, G. R , Lieberman, A., and Baldwin,
`D. S.: Nephrotoxicity of nitrosoureas. Cancer 1981; 48:1328-34.
`M Lazarus, S. S., and Shapiro, S. H.: Influence of nicotinamide and
`pyridine nucleotides on streptozotocin and alloxan-induced pancreatic B-cell
`cytotoxicity. Diabetes 1972; 22:499-506.
`15 Rerup, C. C: Drugs producing diabetes through damage of the insulin
`secreting cells. Pharmacol. Rev. 1970; 22:485-518.
`16 Wilson, G. L., Mossman, B. T., and Craighead, J. E.: Diabetogenic
`effects of chlorozotocin on murine pancreatic beta cells in vitro and in vivo.
`Abstract. J. Cell Biol. 1980; 87:327A.
`'7 Devlin, T. M., Ed.: Test of Biochemistry with Clinical Correlations. New
`York, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.
`18 Lam, P. H.-Y, Talgoy, M. M., and Goldenberg, G. J.: Uptake and
`decomposition of chlorozotocin in L5178Y lymphoblasts in vitro. Cancer Res.
`1980; 40:3950-55
`19 Yamamoto, H., Uchigata, Y., and Yamamoto, H.: Streptozotocin- and
`alloxan-induced DNA strand breads and poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase in pan-
`creatic islets. Nature 1981; 294:284-86.
`20 Yamamoto, H., and Okamoto, H: Protection by picolinamide. a novel
`inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase, against both streptozotocin-induced
`depression of proinsulin synthesis and reduction of NAD content in pancreatic
`islets. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1980; 95:474-81.
`21 Uchigata, Y, Yamamoto, H., Kawamura, A., and Okamoto, H: Pro-
`tection by superoxide dismutase, catalase and poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase
`inhibitors against alloxan- and streptozotocin-induced islet DNA strand breaks
`and against the inhibition of proinsulin synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1982;
`257:6084-88.
`22 Wilson, G. L, Patton, N. J., McCord, J. M., Mullins, D. W., and Moss-
`man, B. T.: Mechanisms of streptozotocin- and alloxan-induced damage in rat
`B-cells. Diabetologia 1984; 27:587-91.
`23 Sandier, S., Welsh, M., and Anderson, A.: Streptozotocin-induced
`impairment of islet B-cell metabolism and its prevention by a hydroxyl radical
`scavenger and inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase. Acta Pharmacol.
`Toxicol. 1983; 53:392-400.
`24 Crouch, R. K., Gardy, S. E., Kimsey, G., Galbraith, R. A., Galbraith,
`G. M. P., and Bose, M. G.: The inhibition of islet superoxide dismutase by
`diabetogenic drugs. Diabetes 1981; 30:235-41.
`25 Fischer, L. J., and Hamburger, S. A.: Inhibition of alloxan action in
`isolated pancreatic islets by superoxide dismutase, catalase, and a metal
`chelator. Diabetes 1980; 29:213-16.
`26 Heikkila, R., Winston, B., and Cohen, G.: Alloxan-induced diabetes:
`evidence for hydroxyl radical as a cytotoxic intermediate. Biochem. Pharmacol.
`1975; 25:1085-92.
`
`DIABETES. VOL 34, JUNE 1985
`
`609
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 8 of 9
`
`

`

`CHLOROZOCIN: A DIABETOGENIC ANALOGUE OF STREPTOZOCIN
`
`27 Berman, L. D., Hayes, J. A., and Sibay, T. M.: Effect of streptozotocin
`in the Chinese hamster
`(Cricetulus griseus). J. Natl. Cancer
`Inst. 1973;
`51:1287-92.
`28 Wilander, E.: Streptozotocin-diabetes in the Chinese hamster. Horm.
`Metab. Res. 1975; 7:15-20.
`29 Rerup, C, and Tarding, R: Streptozotocin and alloxan diabetes in
`mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1969, 7:89-96.
`30 Gunnarsson, R., Berne, C, and Hellerstrom, C: Cytotoxic affects of
`streptozotocin and N-nitrosomethylurea on the pancreatic B-cells with special
`
`regard to the role of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. Biochem. J. 1974;
`140:487-94.
`31 Ganda, 0. P., Rossini, A. A., and Like, A. A.: Studies on streptozotocin
`diabetes. Diabetes 1976; 25:595-603.
`32 Brown, J., Molnar, I. G., Clark, W., and Mullen, Y: Control of experi-
`mental diabetes mellitus in rats by transplantation of fetal pancreases. Science
`1974; 184:1377-79.
`33 Prestayko, A. W., et al., Eds.: Streptozotocin in Nitrosoureas: Current
`Status and New Developments. New York, Academic Press, 1981.
`
`610
`
`DIABETES, VOL 34, JUNE 1985
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2064
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 9 of 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket