throbber
Life Sciences, '4ol. 49, pp. 1593-1601 Pergamon Press Printed in the U.S.A. IN VIVO APPLICATION OF [mIN-DTPA-D-PHEt]-OCTREOTIDE FOR DETECTION OF SOMATOSTATIN RECEPTOR-POSITIVE TUMORS IN RATS W.H. Bakker, E.P. Krenning, J.-C. Reubi, W.A.P. Breeman, B. Setyono-Han, M. de Jong, P.P.M. Kooij, C. Bruns, P.M. van Hagen, P. Marbach, T.J. Visser, J. Pless, S.W.J. Lamberts Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Dijkzigt and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Sandoz Research Institute, Berne, Switzerland; Division of Endocrine Oncology, Dr Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Endocrinology, Sandoz Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland (Received in final form September 23, 1991) Summa Radioiodinated somatostatin analogues are useful ligands for the in vitro and in vivo detection of somatostatin receptors. [ltqn-DTPA-D-Phe']- octreotide, a somatostatin analogue labeled with a different radionuclide, also binds specifically to somatostatin receptors in vitro. In this study we investigated its in vivo application in the visualization of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors in rats. The distribution of the radiopharmaceutical was investigated after intravenous injection in normal rats and in rats bearing the somatostatin receptor-positive rat pancreatic carcinoma CA 20948. After injection the radiopharmaceutical was rapidly cleared (50 % decrease in maximal blood radioactivity in 4 min), predominantly by the kidneys. Excreted radioactivity was mainly in the form of the intact radiopharmaceutical. Ex vivo autoradiographic studies showed that specific accumulation of radioactivity occurred in somatostatin receptor-containing tissue (anterior pituitary gland). However, in contrast to the adrenals and pituitary, the tracer accumulation in the kidneys was not mediated by somatostatin receptors. Increasing radioactivity over the somatostatin receptor- positive tumors was measured rapidly after injection and the tumors were clearly visualized by gamma camera scintigraphy. In rats pre~ with 1 mg octreotide accumulation of [l'~In-DTPA-D-Phe~]-octreotide in the tomo~ was prevented. Because of its relatively long effective half-life, [mIn-DTPA-D- PheX]-octreotide is a radionuclide-coupled somatostatin analogue which can be used to visualize somatostatin receptor-~g tumors efficiently after 24 hr, when interfering background radioactivity is minimized by renal clearance. This is an advantage over the previously used [mI-Tyf]-octreotide which has a shorter effective half-fife and shows high abdominal interference due to its hepato-biliary clearance. Therefore, [l"In-DTPA-D-Pbe~]-octreotide seems a better alternative for scintigraphic imaging of somatostatin receptor-bearing tumors. Radioiodinated analogues have been used extensively in the detection of somatostatin 0024-3205/91 $3.00 + .00 Copyright s 1991 Pergamon Press plc
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`1594 Receptor Sclntigraphy with 111In-somatostatin Vol. 49, No. 22, 1991 receptors in vitro (1). Recently one of these analogues, [mI-TyP]-octreotide, intravenously administered, was shown to visualize somatostatin receptor-positive tumors in vivo by means of gamma camera scintigraphy (2, 3, 4). However, because of a number of drawbacks of this radioiodinated compound, such as its short effective half-life in the blood circulation and high background radiation in the abdominal region, a search was made for an alternative somatostatin analogue, which could be labeled with a different radionuclide, thin. Predominant advantages of "'In over mI (half-life 13.2 hr) are its ready availability as well as its attractive physical properties, such as 173 keV and 246 keV gamma radiation, appropriate for scintigraphy, and half-life of 2.8 d, enabling scintigraphy at longer intervals after injection. Therefore, the somatostatin analogue [DTPA-D-Phe~]-octreotide has been synthesized and the specific binding properties of this peptide, labeled with rain, to somatostatin receptors have been demonstrated (5). Materials and methods Somatostatin analoaues Somatostatin analogues [DTPA-D-Pbet]-octreotide (SDZ 215-811), [TyP]-octreotide (SDZ 204-090) and octreotide (SMS 201-995) were obtained from Sandoz (Basle, Switzerland). Radiolabeling of [Tyr3]-octreotide and [DTPA-D-Pbel]-octreotide with respectively ~I and "~In and consecutive quality control were performed as described before (3, 5). The radiocbemical purity of the radiolabeled somatostatin analogues [*'I-Tyr*]-octreotide and [mIn-DTPA-D- Phe~]-octreotide was greater than 95 %. Animals and tumors Nine male Lewis rats were inoculated in both upper left- and fight hindlegs with the transplantable rat pancreatic tumor CA 20948, which was previously shown to possess somatostatin receptors (6). The growth of this tumor is inhibited by octreotide treatment (7). All conditions were as described before (3). Twelve control animals were studied in parallel. The tumor-bearing animals were divided into two groups: (a) 4 animals without pretreatment and (b) 5 animals which were pretreated subcutaneously with 1 mg octreotide, 30 min before injection of the radiopharmaceutical. All tumor-bearing animals and 10 control animals, used for gamma camera scintigraphy and tissue radioactivity measurements, received 18.5 MBq (0.5 - 1 #g) [mIn-DTPA-D-Pbe~]-octreotide in 0.5 - 0.8 ml 154 mM NaCI intravenously via the dorsal vein of the penis. Two control animals used for ex vivo autoradiography received 74 MBq (1 #g) [tttIn-DTPA-D-Phel]-octreotide. For injection and scintigraphy the animals were anaesthetized with ether. Data acouisition and analvsis The gamma camera and computer system were as described before (3). A medium-energy parallel-hole collimator was used. The analyzer was set to both rain peaks: 173 keV and 246 keV, window 20 %. Dynamic acquisition took place in 1 rain intervals during the first 30 rain after injection of [mIn-DTPA-D-Phe~]-octreotide. For the disappearance of radioactivity from the blood the percentage of the injected dose measured over the heart area was calculated. The renal excretion during the first 30 min after injection, measured over the kidneys together with the bladder, was also calculated as percentage of the injected dose. Over less well-defined regions such as tumor, head and lower fight hindleg fixed areas were chosen in which the time course of radioactivity was expressed relative to that measured during the first min immediately after injection. Static images were obtained 30 mill, 4 hr and 24 hr after injection. On the basis of the static digital images of the animals and proper standards, estimates were made of whole body, kidney and tumor retentions. The 24-hr results of the gamma camera measurements were compared with determinations of radioactivity in isolated tissues using a semi-conductor (GeLi)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`Vol. 49, No. 22, 1991 Receptor Scintigraphy with 11.1In-somatostatin 1595 detector connected to a multichannel analyzer (Series 40, Canberra). The distance to the detector was 20 cm. The uptake of the radionuclide was calculated as a percentage of the dose and as a percentage of the dose/gram tissue. Urine samples of four different control rats were obtained 30 grin, 2 hr and 24 hr after injection of [mIn-DTPA-D-Phel]-octreotide for analysis by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as previously described (5). For this purpose urine samples were diluted 1:10 in HPLC solvent, i.e. 40 % methanol in 0.05 M acetate buffer, pH 5.5, and applied to the C~8 column. Two control animals were perfused with 100 ml 2.5 % glutaraldehyde solution 2 hr, respectively 24 hr after injection of the radiopharmaceutical. Kidneys and pituitaries were isolated and cut with a cryostate (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany) or a freezing microtome (Jung, Heidelberg, Germany) into 10 - 15/tin thick sections. The sections were then apposed to [3H]- LKB ultrofilm as described previously (8). Kidneys of control rats were tested for the presence of somatostatin receptors by means of in vitro receptor autoradiography using [''I-Ty#]- octreotide as ligand (1). The statistical significance of differences was determined with Student's t-test or by analysis of variance. Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05. All data are reported as mean +_ SD. Results [mln-DTPA-D-Phel]-octreotide is rapidly cleared from the blood as is indicated by the decreasing radioactivity above the heart area (Fig. 1). During the fifth min after injection radioactivity over the heart had decreased to 50 % of that during the first rain. Dynamic gamma camera observations show that the radionuclidc is cleared almost exclusively via the kidneys. Already 4 rain after injection radioactivity appears in the bladder. Also in Fig. 1 the g 10 8 "-- 6 .>_ 4 ~, 0 ~ T o 40 ~- 30 o 20 ,M ~ 0 o 14 i~ I I • i 11 T~ T I0 20 30 I0 20 min after injection min after injection 30 FIG. 1 Disappemmice of [11tln-DTPA-D-Pbell-octreotidc from the blood (left) expressed as mean + SD percentage of the administered dose measured over the heart area and renal clearance (fight) expressed as mean + SD percentage of the administered dose measured over the kidneys and the Madder together in 4 control rats ( O ) and 9 tumor-bearing rats ( • ).
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`1596 Receptor Scintlgraphy with 111In-somatostatin Vol. 49, No. 22, 1991 *~ 150 -- 125 o I0O .o 75 ® 0 l i i p 10 20 30 min after injection FIG. 2 Radioactivity as function of time, expressed as mean + SD percentage of the l-rain value, measured above 8 tumors in 4 untreated rats ( © ) and 10 tumors in 5 rats, which were pretreated with 1 mg octreotide ( • ). renal activity together with the excretion of the radionuclide in the bladder, is presented as a function of time. In control rats about 50 % of the injected dose had already been cleared within 30 min via the kidneys, whereas in tumor-bearing rats this clearance was significantly slower (p < 0.05). Pretreatment with 1 mg octreotide did not influence blood clearance or renal clearance (data not shown). During the first 30 rain after injection radioactivity measured above the head and lower right hindleg (without tumor) of all investigated animals showed decreasing blood pool radioactivity (data not shown). Increasing radioactivity was observed over the tumors of the animals immediately after injection, whereas this was not the case in the octreotide-pretreated group (p < 0.001, Fig. 2). Figure 3 presents static analogue images, 30 rain and 24 hr after injection, of one untreated and one octreotide-pretreated animal. It is evident that the clear visualization of this transplantable pancreatic carcinoma (notably after 24 hr) was prevented by pretreatment with the high dose of unlabeled somatostatin analogue. From digital static images obtained 24 hr after injection, whole body retention of radioactivity appeared to be about 10 % (Table I), which was mainly localized in the kidneys (7 %). This quantity closely parallels measurements in isolated kidneys using the semi- conductor detector (Table I). Radioactivity measured over the kidneys remained constant between 4 and 24 hr after injection. The presence of tumors did not significantly influence 24-hr kidney accumulation of radioactivity. Table I also gives the results of the measurements of radioactivity in the tumors with the gamma camera and the semi-condnctor detector. In the tumors of the untreated animals significantly higher percentages of the injected dose were found in comparison with the tumors of the octreotide-pretreated group. Results of radioactivity measurements in a number of tissues (of animals which were not pretreated with octreotide), isolated 24 hr after injection, are reported in Table II. The highest tissue radioactivity concentrations were found in the kidneys and the adrenals. There was no significant difference between radioactivity concentrations in most tissues of control and octreotide-pretreated animals. However, after pretreatment with octreotide the radioactivity concentrations were much lower in the adrenals and in the tumors. Ex vivo autoradiography of the pituitary glands of control rats, obtained 2 and 24 hr after in vivo administration of [mIn-DTPA-D-Pheq-octreotide demonstrated accumulation of radioactivity in the anterior lobe but not in the posterior lobe (Fig. 4), confirming previous studies using in vitro or ex vivo autoradiography (9, 10). Interestingly, ex vivo autoradiography of kidney tissue of the same animals clearly showed the presence of radioactivity in the proximal tubules but not in the glomeruli (Fig. 5). However, with in vitro autoradiography using [12~I-Tyr~]-octreotide as ligand, no specific somatostatin receptors were detected in the kidney (data not shown).
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`Vol. 49, No. 22, 1991 Receptor Scintigraphy with 111In-somatostatin 1597 HPLC of a 30-min and a 2-hr urine sample of two different control rats showed that the excreted radioactivity was in the form of the intact [x~In-DTPA-D-Phe~]-octreotide. Of two late urine samples obtained from control rats 24 hr af~ injection of the radiopharmaceutical (when most radioactivity already had been excreted, see Table I) more than 90 % of the radioactivity was not peptide-bound and eluted in the void volume, probably representing 11qn-DTPA. 30 rain 24 hours a b a b FIG, 3 Static images, 30 rain and 24 hr after injection, of one untreated (a) and one octreotide- pretreated animal (b), showing accumulation in the kidneys (K) and/or urinary bladder (B). Accumulation of radioactivity in tumors (T) in both hindlegs is noted in a, not in b. FIG. 4 Ex vivo autoradiography 24 hr after injection, showing the somatostatin receptors in the rat pituitary gland: A) hematoxylin-eosin stained section showing anterior (A) and posterior (P) pituitary gland. B) autoradiogram showing binding in the anterior pituitary but not in the posterior lobe. Bar = 1 mm. After injection of ["XIn-DTPA-D-Phel]-octreotide the radionuclide disappears rapidly from the circulation. Blood clearance (measured over the heart) during the first 30 min was not noticeably influenced by octreotide-pretreatment nor by the presence of tumors. Gamma
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`

`1598 Receptor Scintigraphy with 111In-somatostatin Vol. 49, No. 22, 1991 FIG. 5 Ex vivo autoradiography sho- wing accumulation of [Hqn- DTPA-D-Phe~] -octreotide by the proximal tubules of the rat kidney (same animal and proce-dure as Fig. 4). A) Hematoxylin-eosin stained section. B) Autoradiogram showing dense labeling of the proximal tubules with sparing of the glomeruli. As dis- cussed in the text the labeling does not represent receptor- bound ligand. Bar= 1 mm. camera images indicate that radioactivity is mainly cleared by the kidneys and excreted with the urine into the bladder (Fig. 3). Total renal excretion during the first 30 rain after injection appeared to be lower in tumor-bearing rats than in control animals (Fig. 1), while the whole body retention at 24 hr after injection showed no significant difference (Table I). This suggests a decreased kidney function in tumor-bearing rats. The predominantly renal clearance of [11qn- DTPA-D-Phel]-octreotide contrasts with the (more rapid) hepato-biliary clearance of [~23I-Tyr3]- octreotide as shown previously (3). With [~qn-DTPA-D-Phet]-octreotide 4 min are required to reduce blood radioactivity to 50 %, while [t~3I-TyPl-octreotide was cleared already by 50 % within 2 min. If it is presumed that this clearance already starts during the first min after injection, the difference in clearance rate between these radiopharmaceuticals might be even greater. Furthermore, in contrast to the lz~I-labeled somatostatin analogue, [mln-DTPA-D- Phe~]-octreotide is hardly metabolized and thus excreted intact. Additionally, high radioactivity background levels interfering with scintigraphic detection in the abdominal region are not seen using [mln-DTPA-D-Phell-octreotide. Although initial renal clearance (during the first 30 min, Fig. 1) is higher in control animals, whole body retention of radioactivity after 24 hr is not significantly different between control and tumor-beating rats, demonstrating that the presence of tumors does not noticeably influence the cumulative excretion. Renal retention after 24 hr was also not influenced by octreotide-pretreatment, suggesting that this process is not mediated via specific somatostatin receptors. Although the proximal tubules of the kidney showed accumulation of ~"In as demonstrated by ex vivo autoradiography of kidneys from untreated control rats which were injected with [mln-DTPA-D-Phe'l-octreotide 2 and 24 hr before sacrifice, no somatostatin receptors were detected with in vitro autoradiography of the kidney with the somatostatin analogue [~z~I-TyP]-octreotide. We hypothesize therefore, that accumulation of [mln-DTPA-D-Phe']-octreotide in the kidney occurs by fixation in the proximal tubules during reabsorption after glomernlar filtration or during tubular excretion via the proximal tubules. During the first 30 rain studied, decreasing radioactivity was measured over the heads and lower hindlegs of all animals, reflecting the disappearance of radionuclide from the blood pool. However, over the tumors of the untreated animals radioactivity increased significantly, while the tumors of the octreotide-pretreated animals only showed decreasing blood pool activity. It should be realized that the increasing radioactivity over the tumors in the untreated animals is
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 6 of 9
`
`

`

`Vol. 49, No. 22, 1991 Receptor Scintigraphy with 111In-somatostatin 1599 t~ole Control ani|als Tutor-bearing ani|als ~dmys Control animals Tulor-bearinq animals ~fller Not pretreated a Pretreated with octreotide b Method n % dose at 4 hr A 2 15 -+3 A 4 21+ 2 A 2 9_+1 B 6 A 4 8_+1 B 4 A 8 1.6 _+ 0.5 B 8 A I0 0.6 + 0.3 c B i0 % dose at 24 hr i0'+i 13'+2 7_+1 6-+2 7'+1 8'+1 0.8-+0.3 0.9-+0.4 0.25,+0.28 c 0.25,+0.~ c gean + SD retention in the whole body, kidneys and tumor after the intravenous administration of [111In-DIPA-I)-Phe1]-octreotide to control and t~or-bearing rats expressed as percentage of the dose, based on A) digital gain camera ina~s, and B) semi-conductor leusurenents of isolatod tissues, a) ~mer mass (lean ,+ SD) 12 ,+ 5 gram; ) tumor mass Ii ,+ 4 gran. c) Significantly different (p < 0.001) from untreated rats). Tissue kidneys liver heart intestines a spleen adrenals lungs thyaun thyroid pituitary rest blood urine tumors Control unilals ~mor-bearinq animals + octreotide n=4 n=4 n=5 % dose % dose/~al % duse/~a 6-+2 0.48 ,+ 0.05 0.011 ,+ 0.002 2.1 _+ 0.4 0.032 ,+ 0.010 0.08 ,+ 0.02 0.028 ,+ 0.004 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 1.1 _+ 0.3 2.2 ,+ 0.6 0.041 ,+ 0.012 0.012 _+ 0.002 0.13 ,+ 0.03 0.06 _+ 0.02 2.0 ,+ 0.4 0.019 ,+ 0.003 0.0049 ,+ 0.0010 0.008 ,+ 0.001 0.14 ,+ 0.04 2.5 ,+ 0.4 0.038 + 0.003 0.012 ,+ 0.004 0.09 _+ 0.02 0.05 ,+ 0.03 2.2 ,+ 0.6 0.015 ,+ 0.003 0.005 ,+ 0.002 0.030 ,+ 0.016 0.18 _+ 0.13 0.09 ,+ 0.04 % dose/qran 2.4 ,+ 0.7 0.039 ,+ O.011 0.011 ,+ 0.001 0.09 ,+ 0.06 0.06 ,+ 0.02 0.19 .+ 0.04 b 0.015 + 0.003 0.003 + 0.001 0.018 ± 0.007 0.34 + 0.58 0.025 _+ 0.008 b Mean + SD tissue distribution in rats 24 hr after intravenous ed~inistration of [lllIn-DTPA-D-Phel]- octreotide, based on semi-conductor ieasurenents of isolated tissues. a) including pancreas b) p < 0.001 vs untreated rats the sum of increasing receptor binding and decreasing blood pool radioactivity. The latter component masks the increase in specific tumor accumulation. Therefore, specific rumor accumulation increases even more sharply than depicted in Fig. 2. Measurements after 4 and 24 hr demonstrated significantly higher accumulation of ~In in tumors of untreated animals
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`

`1600 Receptor Scintigraphy with 111In-somatostatin re1. 49, No. 22, 1991 than in the octreotide-pretreated rats, suggesting binding to the somatostatin receptors of these tumors (Table I). These findings are confirmed by gamma camera scinfigraphy after 24 hr (Fig. 3). Furthermore, specific accumulation of [mIn-DTPA-D-Phe~]-octreotide is shown in somatostatin receptor-positive tissues, such as the adrenals (8) and the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland (9), by counting of isolated organs and/or autoradiography, confirming the specificity of [z~'In-DTPA-D-Pbe~]-octreotide as a radioligand for somatostatin receptors. Their high numbers in the brain (9) however are not visualized, probably because the radioligand does not cross the blood-brain barrier. [lqn-DTPA-D-Phe~]-octreotide which has been shown to bind to somatostatin receptors in vitro, accumulates in vivo specifically in somatostatin receptor-positive normal tissues such as the adrenal and anterior pituitary gland. Similarly, somatostatin receptor-positive tumors accumulate the radiophannaceutical specifically and can be visualized by gamma camera scintigraphy. Compared with the previously used somatostatin analogue [mI-Tyr3]-octreotide, the combination of the longer residence of [l"In-DTPA-D-Phel]-octreotide in the circulation, its longer physical half-life (2.8 d versus of 13 hr) and the absence of hepato-biliary metabolism (with consequent interfering radioactivity in this region) makes this compound very suitable for imaging of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors in rats. Tumor/background ratios were highest 24 hr after administration when interfering blood pool radiation was minimal. These properties suggest that [lqn-DTPA-D-PheX]-octreotide is also a very useful radiopharmaceutical for scintigraphic imaging of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors in man. AgJmmzlule.~ltn~ The authors wish to thank Fred Bonthuis, Ursula Horisberger, Ina l.x~ve, Marcel van der Pluijm and Beatrice Waser for their expert assistance during the experiments. References 1. J.C. REUBI, W.H. I-IACKI AND S.W.J. LAMBERTS, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 651127- 1134 (1987). 2. E.P. KRENNING, W.H. BAKKER, W.A.P. BREEMAN, J.W. KOPER, P.P.M. KOOIJ, L. AUSEMA, J.S. LAMERIS, J.C. REUBI AND S.W.J. LAMBERTS, Lancet 1 242-244 (1989). 3. W.H. BAKKER, E.P. KRENNING, W.A. BREEMAN, J.W. KOPER, P.P. KOOU, J.C. REUBI, J.G.KLIJN, T.J. VISSER, R. DOCTER, AND S.W. LAMBERTS, J Nucl Med 31 1501 - 1509 (1990). 4. W.H. BAKKER, E.P. KRENNING, W.A. BREEMAN, P.P.M. KOOIJ, J.-C. REUBI, J.W.KOPER, M. DE JONG, J.S. LAMERIS, T.J. VISSER AND S.W. LAMBERTS, J Nucl Med 32 1184-1189 (1991). 5. W.H. BAKKER, R. ALBERT, C. BRUNS, W.A.P. BREEMAN, L.J. HOFLAND, P. MARBACH, J. PLESS, D. PRALET, B STOLZ, J.W. KOPER, S.W.J. LAMBERTS, T.J. VISSER AND E.P. KRENNING, Life Sci 49 1583-1591 (1991). 6. J.C. REUBI, U. HORISBERGER, C.E. ESSED, J. JEEKEL, J.G.M. KLIJN AND S.W.J. LAMBERTS, Gastroenterology 95 760-763 (1988).
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 8 of 9
`
`

`

`Vol. 49, No. 22, 1991 Receptor Scintigraphy with 111In-somatostatln 1601 7. J.G.M. KLIJN, B. SETYONO-HAN, G.H. BAKKER, H. PORTENGEN AND J.A. FOEKENS, Progress in Cance~ Research and Therapy. F. Bresciani, R.J.B. King, M.E. Lippman and J.-P. Raynaud (eds), Vol 35, 550 - 553, Raven Press, New York (1988). 8. R. MAURER AND J.C. REUBI, Mol Cell Endocrinol 45 81 - 90 (1986). 9. J.C. REUBI AND R. MAURER, Neurosci 15 1183 -1193 (1985). 10. J.C. REUBI, L. KVOLS, E. KRENNING AND S.W.J. AMBERTS. Metabolism 39 (Suppl 2) 78 - 81 (1990).
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2048
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 9 of 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket