throbber
Cancer Letters, 7 (1979) 197—202
`0 Else-vier/North-Holland Scientific Publishers Ltd
`
`197
`
`TRANSPLANTATION OF AZASERINE-INDUCLD CARCINOMAS OF
`PANCREAS IN‘lRATS*
`
`DANIEL S LONGNECKER. HERMAN S. LILJA, JANICE FRENCH, ELNA
`KUHLMAHN and WALTER NOLL
`Department of Pathology. Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755 (H 5.11 )
`(Received 26 March 1979}
`(Accepted 16 April 1979)
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Two pancreatic adenocarcinomas which had been induced in Wistar/
`Lewis rats by azuserine treatment were transplanted into rats of the same
`strain by subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injection of minced tumor.
`Subsequently, we have serially transplanted into non-rachated recipients.
`Transplanted tumors have maintained evidence of acinar cell differentiation
`including the presence of zymogen granules in tumors studied by electron
`microscopy, and of lipase, amylase and tiypsin activity in the supernatant
`of tumor homogenates. Histologically, the tumors vary from poorly dif-
`fei-en tiated solid carcinomas to well differentiated variants which form
`acini. Transplanted tumors are locally invasive and have metastasized to lung
`and liver in some recipients.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Aziaiserine is a pancreatic carcinogen in rats which induces a spectrum of
`pancreatic lesions including nodules of atypical acinar cells, adenomas and
`adenocarcinomns [3]. Atypical acinar cell nodules (AACN) have been ob-
`served as early as 2 months after initial azaserine injection. Adenomas have
`developed by 6 months and adenocarcinomas by 9—12 months. We have
`attempted to establish transplantable neoplasms by implantation of minced
`AACN-bearing pancreas throughout the 2—18 month interval after initial
`azaserine treatment and by transplantation of induced adenocarcinomau.
`We have been successful only when we have transplanted from a grossly
`
`Addrosa all correspondence to Daniel S. Lonmiecker, NCI, NIH. Building 37. Room 5322,
`Bethesda MD 20205, U SA.
`*Supported by UBPHS (entrant No. 1 GP 33378 and grant (DA-20948 from the Division
`of Cancer Cause and Prevention. NCI/NIH
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par V. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 6
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`198
`
`identifiable pancreatic carcinoma. The characteristics of 2 such tumors
`are described here.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`WisterlLewis rats (Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA)
`were fed laboratory chow (except as noted) and water ad libitum. Azaserine
`(Calbiocliem. La Jolla, CA) dissolved in 0.9% NaCl was injected intraperi~
`mneally to induce AACN and carcinomas. A total of 12—15 injections,
`10 rug/kg, were given twice weekly, weekly, or monthly.
`Rats were autopsied 2—18 months after initial treatment. Pancreas or
`tumor from an area of necrosis was cxcisad and minced in sterile Hanks balanc-
`ed salt solution until fragments were small enough to pass through an 18
`gauge needle. The suspension of minced tissue was injected both subcuta-
`neously between the scapulae and intraperitoneally, depositing about 0.5 in]
`(estimated to contain 5—25 mg tissue) at each site. The recipients received
`425 rads of whole body radiation on the day prior to -ni'tia.l transplantation
`of pancreas from azaserine-treated rats. After transpianted tumors were
`established subsequent passages have been to non-radiated recipients. Re~
`cipiems were examined weekly for evidence of tumor growth for a period
`of 3 months when they were autopsied.
`During the early phase of transplantation attempts (i.e., 2—12 months),
`saline-mjecwd rats were also used as donors to control for the sumval and/or
`growth of transplanted ‘normal' pancreatic tissue. Tissue from one donor
`was injected into 5 recipients.
`Residual pancreas or portions of tumor of donor rats was fixed in Susa’s
`solution for histologic study. Portions of transplanted tumors have been
`fixed in 4% cacodylate-buffered glutaralclehyde (pH 7.4) for electron micro-
`scopy and prepared as described previously [2]. Evaluation of some recipi~
`ants has been limited to gross exam and histologic study of neoplasms.
`Portions of transplaan neoplasms from several rats were frozen at the
`time of autopsy for enzyme assays which were subsequently performed
`using the 2700 X g supernatant of 1 : 10 (w/v) homogenates prepared in
`N30! (0 .015 M)—NaCitrate (0.0015 M) buffer, pH 7.0. 'ii‘rypsm activity
`was assayed using the spectrophotometric method of Hummel [1] with
`p—tosyl-L-arginine methylester as substrate. Amylase activity was measured
`using a dyed starched method (Phadebas®, Phannacia Diagnostics, Piscata-
`way, NJ). Lipase activity was determmed by hydrolysis of an olive oil
`suspension and titrimetr'ic assay of liberated fatty acids using a modification
`[7] of the method of Tietz [8].
`RESU 'L'I‘S
`
`Data for the primary transplantation attempts'is summarized in Table 1.
`We failed in 10 attempts to establish transplants from AACN bearing pan-
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par V. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 6
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`199
`
`TABLE 1
`SUMMARY OF ATTEMPTED TRANSPLANTATION FROM PANCREASES OF
`AZASERINETREATED WISTAE/LEWIS RATS
`'Takes’
`Donor rat
`Lesionh
`Interval”
`Number of
`Recxpients
`treatment ‘
`donors
`_.____'___________________,____._.________,.._
`A
`AACN
`2
`2
`12
`0
`A
`AACN
`4
`2
`10
`0
`A
`MON
`6
`2
`10
`0
`A
`AACN
`9
`2
`1 0
`0
`A
`MON
`1 2
`2
`1 0
`0
`A
`AACN, adenoma
`18
`2
`10
`0'1
`B
`Adenocarcmome
`1 5
`1
`5
`1.
`
` 12Adenccarcinoma Al 1 4‘
`
`C
`
`
`
`" Azssennc injections were given according to the followmg'Schedulcs: (A) 12 Imections,
`10 org/kg, twice weekly for 6 weeks, (B) 15 injections. 10 rug/kg. once weekly. The
`proper number (IF-33378, will be mud to denote transplants from this tumor, (0) 15
`injection:. 10 mglkg, once weekly for 6 weeks and then once monthly for 9 months.
`This group vva.I maintained on a modification of the defined diet recommended for rats
`by the American Institute for Nutrition which contained 18% corn oil. The prOJect
`number, CA-20948, will denote transplants from this tumor.
`1'A portion of the transplanted pancreas and/or neoplasm was processed for histology.
`The histologic diagnosis is indicated here.
`0The interval horn first azaserine injection until transplantation «nd autopsy
`“Four recipiean from one of these donors contained persustent ductal structures In the
`site of subcutaneous implantation. These were detected histologically. but they were not
`identified grossly. The resrdual donor pancreas contained both adenomas and AACN.
`aThese rel iplents did not receiva radiation.
`
`creasas. We were successful in 2 attempts to transplant grossly identified
`pancreatic neoplasms.
`The first successful transplant was from a 9-mm mass in the head of the
`panoreas and the second was from a 2.0-cm pancreatic mass. Histologically,
`the neoplasms were poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas which grew “1
`several patterns. The most common histologic appearance was as a solid
`mass ofrelatively small cells w1thout evidence of gland formation or zymogen
`production (Fig. 1). In limited areas, the neoplasm contained acinar or
`tubular structures composed of cells with apical, eosinophilic, coarsely
`granular cytoplasm cousu tent mth zy mogen granules (Fig. 2). In other
`areas the neoplasms were cystic and lived by cuboidal cells. Central necrosis
`was common in larger messes.
`Electron micrographs showed abundant rough endoplasmic retlculum and
`zymogen granules in some tumor cells (Fig. 3). Thus, the pnmary neoplasms
`and the transplants are Similar to prenously described azaserme-induced
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par V. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 3 of 6
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`Fig 1. Pancreatic carcinoma from a subcutaneous transplant of tumor CP 33378. This
`solid area shows httle evndence of acmar cell differenhaflon. H 8: E x 240
`Fig. 2 Pancreatic carcmomfl 1n liver from transplant recxplent of tumor CA 20948 The
`formation of tubules and mum Is evidence or acmar cell dlfferenhatmn H & E X 240
`
`
`
`
`Flt; 3. Ce
`ruticulm and zymogen granuleu Lend citrate and uranyl acetate )t 5000
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par v. Novartis, [PR 2016-01479
`Page 4 of 6
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`201
`
`neoplasms which have maintained evidence of aciiiar cell differentiation.
`Tumor homogenates demonstrated trypsin, amylase and lipase actiVity
`(Table 2). The level of activity was lower than that of normal pancreas, but
`evidence of these enzyme activ1ties persisted through 6 passages.
`Subcutaneously transplanted tumors achieved a maximum diameter of
`.5.4 cm in as short a period as 3.5 weeks. Larger neoplasms tended to ulcerate
`and become necrotic. Some of these neoplasms invaded the thorax.
`Intraperitoneal transplants grew in the small bowel mesentery, the omen-
`turn, the retroperitoneum, and in the region of the pancreas. Foci ii. kidney.
`liver, spleen and lung were apparently metastatic. The largest intraperitoneal
`mass weighed 18 g although most were nodules measuring 2—6 mm in
`diameter.
`The CP-33878 derived carcinoma has been transplanted into 49 recipients
`from 13 donors. Nine of the last 10 recipients have developed tumors. The
`CA-20948 derived tumor has been transplanted into 15 rats representing
`4 donors. Eleven of the last 12 recipients have had ‘takes.’
`Although none of the recipients which were implanted with AACN-
`bearing pancreas developed neoplasms, a few surviving well differentiated
`acmar cells and ductlike structures were found subcutaneously in the im-
`plantation site. It is not known if these cells were derived horn AACN or
`from normal pancreas, but we did not find such remnants in rats implanted
`with pancreas fragments from control rats.
`
`TABLE 2
`
`_ ENZYME ACTIVITY OF TRANSPLANTED TUMOR HOMOGENA'I‘ES“
`Tumor (generation)
`nb
`Amylase
`Lipase
`'Ih'ypsin
`CP 33378 (2)
`2
`2389
`120
`—
`(8)
`1
`1731
`100
`2.8
`(4)
`S
`7426
`290
`—
`(5)
`3
`4506
`1 20
`-
`(e)
`2
`4954
`25
`—-
`CA 209480)
`3
`1327
`810
`12.7
`(2)
`3
`1 583
`69'!
`-
`(4)
`1
`1333
`120
`-
`Rat pancreas
`1
`16667
`1200
`
`“Enuyme activity is expressed as units/ml of homogenate supernatant which represents
`100 mg of tissue (wei, wt). Amylase and trypsin activity is given in international units. and
`lipase activity is expressed as Sigma-Tana unim.
`bNumber of tumors assayed. Enzyme activities are the mean for n homogenates.
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par V. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 5 of 6
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`202
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The transplantable azaserine-induoed adenocarcinomas described in this
`report show ultrastructural and biochemical characteristics of acinar cell
`differentiation. They seem therefore to be similar to the transplantable
`acinar cell neoplasm reported by Reddy and Rao [4]. Recently, trans-
`plantable ductal adenocarcinomas of pancreas induced by N-nitrosobis(2-
`oxopropyliamine have been described in hamsters by 2 groups [5,6]. The
`availability of this spectrum of trmnsplantable pancreatic carcinomas in 2
`experimental species offers models for studies of tumor biology and ex-
`perimental chemotherapy.
`Our failure to establish neoplasms by implantation of minced pancreas
`containing AACN is consistent with the interpretation that these lesions,
`in general, do not have adequate growth potential and autonomy for ‘malig-
`nant’ growth. On the other hand, the failure to establish neoplasms in these
`experiments could reflect a technical barrier such as a low dose of AACN-
`deri'ved cells and poor cell survival under the transplant conditions. Pre-
`vious studies in rats have shown that the ratio of the number of AACN to
`the number of foci of carcinoma is high in carcinogen-treated animals. We
`estimate that this ratio is in the range of 100-1000. Thus, the failure to
`transplant could also reflect a specific failure to implant an AACN with
`malignant growth potential.
`REFERENCES
`
`1 Hurnmel, B.C.W. (1959) A modified spectrophotometnc determination of chymrx-
`tryuin, trypsin. and thrombin. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 37. 1893—1399.
`2 Longiecioer, D.S., Crawford, EC. and Nadier, DJ. (1975) Recovery of pancreas
`from mild puromycin‘inducsd injury. a histologic and ultrastructursi study in rats.
`Arch. Pathol., 99, 5—10.
`3 Lanznecker, BS. and Curphey, TJ. (1975) Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in
`uzaserine treated rats. Cancer Res, 85, 2249-2257.
`4 Raddy, «Lit. and Rao, M.S. (1977) Transplantable pancreatic carcinoma of the nab.
`Science, 198, 78—80
`6 Scarpeiii, ILG. and Rao, M.S. (1979) Transplantable ductai alenocareinoma of
`Syrian hamster pancreas. Cancer Res, 39, 462—458.
`6 ’l‘akai-ashi, M., Rungc, R., Douneily, ’I‘. and Pour, P. (l979)’i‘he morpholognc and
`biologic chat .ictenstios of chemically-induced pancreatic ndenocarcinoma in Sy nan
`golden hammrs after homologous transplantation. Cancer Letters, in press
`Technical Bulletin No. 800, Sigma Chemical Company. St. Louis, MO
`'i‘ietz, N.W., Borden, T. and Stepieton, JD. (1959) An improved method for the
`determination of lipase in serum. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 81. 14e—154.
`I
`
`Gd
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par V. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 6 of 6
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2038
`Par v. Novartis, IPR 2016-01479
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket