`571-272-7822 Date: April 21, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS AG,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01479
`Patent 9,006,224 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Charlotte Jacobsen
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.10
`
`
`Having reviewed the Patent Owner Novartis’ unopposed Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Charlotte Jacobsen (Paper 13) and supporting
`Declaration of Ms. Jacobsen (Ex. 2037), we determine that good cause exists
`for granting admission pro hac vice to Ms. Jacobsen, subject to the
`conditions set forth below.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01479
`Patent 9,006,224 B2
`
`
`It is hereby:
`ORDERED that the Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Charlotte
`Jacobsen (Paper 13) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Jacobsen is authorized to represent
`Patent Owner in this proceeding as back-up counsel only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Jacobsen is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, and
`shall be subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01479
`Patent 9,006,224 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Daniel Brown
`Jonathan Strang
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`daniel.brown@lw.com
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Nicholas N. Kallas
`Raymond Mandra
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`nkallas@fchs.com
`rmandra@fchs.com
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`