throbber
GASTROENTEROLOGY 1998;114:791–797
`
`Guanylin Stimulates Regulated Secretion From Human
`Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Cells
`
`MATHIAS JOHN,* BERTRAM WIEDENMANN,‡ MOGENS KRUHØFFER,§ KNUT ADERMANN,§
`IEVA ANKORINA–STARK,\ EBERHARD SCHLATTER,\ GUDRUN AHNERT–HILGER,¶
`WOLF–GEORG FORSSMANN,§ and MICHAELA KUHN§
`*Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universita¨t Berlin, Berlin; §Lower Saxony Institute for Peptide Research,
`Hannover; \Experimentelle Nephrologie, Medizinische Poliklinik, Westfa¨lische Wilhelms-Universita¨t Mu¨nster, Mu¨nster; and ‡Universita¨tsklinikum
`Charite´ der Humboldt-Universita¨t zu Berlin, Medizinische Klinik m. S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, and
`¶Charite´, Institut fu¨r Anatomie, Humboldt Universita¨t Berlin, Berlin, Germany
`
`Background & Aims: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroen-
`docrine cells secrete chemical messengers in a calcium-
`dependent fashion. So far, other second messenger
`systems involved in regulated secretion have gained
`little attention. The aim of this study was to character-
`ize guanosine 38,58-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP)-
`mediated vesicular secretion in pancreatic neuroendo-
`crine cells. Methods: In a human pancreatic cell line,
`BON, cyclic nucleotide levels and chromogranin A
`release were monitored with specific immunoassays.
`Uptake and release of ␥-aminobutyric acid were mea-
`sured. Intracellular Ca2⫹ concentration was monitored
`with fura-2. Guanylyl cyclase C was analyzed by reverse-
`transcription polymerase chain reaction. Results: Gua-
`nylin increased cGMP concentrations in BON cells via
`guanylyl cyclase C. Stimulation of the cGMP pathway
`by guanylin or Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin
`increased the release of chromogranin A and ␥-amino-
`butyric acid from BON cells. This effect was mimicked
`by the cGMP analogue 8-bromo-cGMP. Conclusions:
`Guanylin and STa stimulate the regulated secretion
`from BON cells via guanylyl cyclase C and cGMP. Our
`study yields novel information about secretory proper-
`ties of guanylin, mediated via a signal transduction
`pathway, increasing cGMP and leading to regulated
`secretion of neuroendocrine cells.
`
`In neuroendocrine cells, two separate, regulated secre-
`
`tory pathways are activated by an elevation of the
`intracellular Ca2⫹ concentration.1,2 Secretory granules/
`large dense core vesicles mediate the release of biogenic
`amines and peptides, and small synaptic vesicle analogues
`store and release amino acid transmitters such as ␥-
`aminobutyric acid (GABA).1,2 The second messenger
`guanosine 38,58-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) has gained
`increasing attention as an important component in the
`control of widespread cellular functions. In the mamma-
`lian digestive tract, at least three different guanylyl
`cyclases (GCs) are expressed: (1) a receptor GC stimulated
`
`by atrial natriuretic peptide (GC-A), (2) a soluble GC
`stimulated by nitric oxide (NO), and (3) a particulate
`(intestinal) form of receptor GC (GC-C).3
`GC-C, mainly localized in the apical membrane of
`intestinal epithelial cells,
`is activated by heat-stable
`enterotoxins (STa) of several bacteria (i.e., Escherichia coli)
`causing acute secretory diarrhea by enhanced intestinal
`chloride and water secretion.4 Two intestinal peptide
`ligands, guanylin and uroguanylin, support the physi-
`ological significance of GC-C (for review, see Forte and
`Currie5). Because STa and guanylins increase chloride
`secretion across the intestinal mucosa in vitro by elevat-
`ing cGMP6 at the luminal (apical) site of enterocytes, it
`was suggested that these peptides mediate intestinal
`epithelial transport via paracrine mechanisms.
`Little information exists about the effects of cGMP on
`regulated secretory vesicles of neuroendocrine cells of the
`gastroenteropancreatic system. Guanylin immunoreactiv-
`ity has been observed in enterocytes and in endocrine
`pancreas.7 Furthermore, STa-altered cGMP levels in RIN
`1046-38 rat insulinoma cells suggest the expression of
`GC-C in these cells.8 In chromaffin cells of the adrenal
`medulla, guanylin was found to be colocalized with
`catecholamines.9 Thus, the guanylin peptide family could
`play a role in modulating regulated secretion of various
`gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tissues via para-
`crine and autocrine mechanisms.
`The pancreatic cell line BON, derived from a human
`pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, is a widely used model
`system for neuroendocrine secretion.2,10,11 BON cells
`release serotonin and chromogranin A. The release is
`stimulated by an increase in the intracellular concentra-
`
`Abbreviations used in this paper: 8-Br-cGMP, 8-bromocyclic guano-
`sine monophosphate; DEANO, 1,1-diethyl-2-hydroxy-2-nitroso-
`hydrazine; GABA, ␥-aminobutyric acid; GC, guanylyl cyclase; IBMX,
`38-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT,
`reverse transcription; STa, heat-stable enterotoxin.
`r 1998 by the American Gastroenterological Association
`0016-5085/98/$3.00
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1040
`Page 001
`
`

`
`792 JOHN ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 114, No. 4
`
`tion at Ca2⫹ ([Ca2⫹]i) or adenosine 38,58-cyclic monophos-
`phate (cAMP).11 BON cells take up GABA by specific
`transporters and release it in a Ca2⫹-dependent fashion.2
`We have investigated the expression of the guanylin
`receptor, GC-C, compared with other GCs in BON cells.
`The effects of cGMP on secretion of GABA and chromo-
`granin A, secretory marker molecules for both the small
`synaptic vesicle and the large dense core vesicle secretory
`pathway, respectively, were analyzed. We also performed
`fura-2 measurements of [Ca2⫹]i to characterize the events
`leading from cGMP alterations to altered secretion.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Atrial natriuretic peptide (CDD/ANP-99-126) and
`human guanylin were synthesized by Dr. K. Adermann, Lower
`Saxony Institute for Peptide Research (Hannover, Germany).
`Brain natriuretic peptide and C-type natriuretic peptide were
`obtained from Saxon Biochemicals (Hannover, Germany). The
`NO donor 1,1-diethyl-2-hydroxy-2-nitroso-hydrazine (DEANO)
`was from Alexis (Gru¨ nberg, Germany), and BayK 8644 was
`obtained from ICN (Eschwege, Germany). ␥-Amino[2,3-3H]-
`butyric acid ([3H]GABA, 80 Ci/mmol) was purchased from
`Amersham (Braunschweig, Germany). Chromogranin A en-
`zyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits were from DAKO
`(Hamburg, Germany). Fura-2/AM was from Molecular Probes
`(Eugene, OR). All other substances were from Sigma (Deisen-
`hofen, Germany). Except for DEANO, all agents were dis-
`solved in distilled water. DEANO was dissolved with 1
`mmol/L NaOH, and A23187 was dissolved in dimethyl
`sulfoxide. Final concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide did not
`exceed 0.1% and were without effect in the experiments.
`
`Cell Culture
`BON cells, a gift from C. M. Townsend (Galveston,
`TX) were cultivated as described.2,10 Experiments were per-
`formed with BON cells of passages 36–48, cultured in 24-well
`(⬃5 ⫻ 105 cells/well;
`tissue culture plates
`for 2 days
`⬃125.8 ⫾ 1.8 µg protein/well; mean ⫾ SEM). All experiments
`were performed using three wells each time, and mean ⫾ SEM
`of at least three different experiments are shown.
`
`Measurement of Intracellular Cyclic
`Nucleotide Content
`BON cells were washed twice with oxygenated Krebs-
`Ringer-HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing the following
`(mmol/L): NaCl, 130; KCl, 4.7; MgSO4, 1.2; CaCl2, 2.5;
`HEPES, 10; glucose, 11; and 0.2% bovine serum albumin.
`Cells were preincubated at 37°C for 15 minutes in 0.5 mL
`Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer with or without 38-isobutyl-1-
`methylxanthine (IBMX, 1 mmol/L). Test agents were added to
`the wells for an additional 30 minutes. Incubation was stopped
`by aspirating the medium, and 0.1 mL ice-cold ethanol (70%,
`vol/vol) was added per well to extract of intracellular cyclic
`nucleotides. After freeze-thawing, extracts were dried by
`
`evaporation and resolved in 1 mL of 50 mmol/L sodium acetate
`buffer (pH 6.0). Solubilized extracts were acetylated, and
`cellular cGMP and cAMP contents were measured with specific
`radioimmunoassays.12,13
`
`Detection of GC-C mRNA
`by Reverse-Transcription Polymerase
`Chain Reaction
`Total RNA was isolated from BON and T84 cells with
`RNeasy (Quiagen, Hilden, Germany). First-strand complemen-
`tary DNA was synthesized from 5 µg RNA as described
`previously.14 One percent of the reverse transcription (RT)
`reaction mixture was mixed with polymerase chain reaction
`(PCR) buffer containing 20 nmol of each deoxynucleoside
`triphosphate and 20 pmol of each primer. The amplification
`was performed in a Perkin-Elmer Cetus thermocycler (Perkin
`Elmer, Stuttgart, Germany) using the following parameters: 5
`minutes of denaturation at 96°C, addition of 1 U Taq
`DNA-polymerase (Biomol, Hamburg, Germany) at 62°C (hot
`start), and 90 seconds of primer extension at 72°C. The
`parameters for the following 34 cycles were denaturation, 96°C
`for 20 seconds; annealing, 62°C for 10 seconds; and extension,
`72°C for 90 seconds. Primers used for PCR amplification of
`GC-C were 58-AGKCAGAASTGCCACAATGGCA (bases 77–
`98), and 58-AAGTACATCTRCTTYCTRGCTGGA (comple-
`mentary to bases 469–492). Negative controls included ampli-
`fication of an RT reaction from which the reverse transcriptase
`was omitted as well as amplification in the absence of template,
`or one primer. The PCR reaction products were analyzed in
`1.5% ethidium bromide–stained agarose gels. To confirm that
`the PCR products were really GC-C, the products were purified
`and directly sequenced using a dye terminator sequencing kit
`(Perkin Elmer).
`
`Measurements of [Ca2ⴙ]i
`[Ca2⫹]i of BON cells was measured with the Ca2⫹-
`sensitive dye fura-2-AM as described previously.15 BON cells of
`passage 48 were grown on glass coverslips (thickness, 0.2 mm;
`diameter, 30 mm), which were mounted on a perfusion
`chamber fixed on the stage of an inverted microscope and
`superfused with phosphate-buffered saline containing 1.3
`mmol/L calcium gluconate (pH 7.4, 37°C). Loaded BON cells
`were excited at 340, 360, and 380 nm, and fura-2 emission was
`recorded at 500–530 nm. The ratio of the emission after
`excitation at 340 and 380 nm at 10 Hz was calculated.
`Fluorescence at 360 nm was used to judge leakage or bleaching
`of fura-2, loss of cells, or air bubbles in the area of measurement
`during the experiments. Calibration of [Ca2⫹]i was performed
`at the end of each experiment by incubation of the cells with
`the Ca2⫹ ionophore ionomycin (1 µmol/L) in the presence (1.3
`mmol/L) and nominal absence of Ca2⫹ (with 5 mmol/L ethylene
`glycol-bis(␤-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N8,N8-tetraacetic acid). All
`agonists were dissolved in phosphate buffer before the experi-
`ment and tested for at least 4 minutes.
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1040
`Page 002
`
`

`
`April 1998
`
`GUANYLIN–STIMULATED NEUROENDOCRINE SECRETION 793
`
`Regulated Secretion of GABA
`and Chromogranin A
`Secretion experiments were performed with BON cells
`preloaded for 2 hours at 37°C in Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer
`containing 0.5 µCi/mL [3H]GABA, 1 mmol/L aminooxyacetic
`acid, and 1 mmol/L gabaculine (for details, see Ahnert-Hilger
`et al.2,16). Aminooxyacetic acid was added to prevent [3H]GABA
`decomposition, and gabaculine is an inhibitor of endogenous
`GABA synthesis and was used to prevent dilution of stored
`[3H]GABA by endogenously synthesized unlabeled GABA.
`Subsequently, preloaded cells were washed three times with
`Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer. Treatment with secretagogues
`was performed for 25 minutes at 37°C in the absence (controls)
`or presence of various agents. The secretion was terminated by
`aspiration of the supernatant. [3H]GABA was determined in
`both the supernatant and cell pellet dissolved in lysis buffer
`containing 130 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 10 mmol/L CaCl2, 75
`mmol/L NaCl, pH 8.0, and 0.4% Triton X-100. In addition,
`chromogranin A concentrations were determined in the super-
`natants of untreated and stimulated BON cells using a
`chromogranin A–specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
`(DAKO Diagnostika, Hamburg, Germany). Release is ex-
`pressed as percent of controls; controls without secretagogue
`were set 100%.
`
`Uptake of GABA Into BON Cells
`GABA uptake into intact cells was performed as
`previously described.2 After two washing steps with Krebs-
`Ringer-HEPES buffer, BON cells were incubated in 200 µL
`Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer containing [3H]GABA in the
`presence of 1 mmol/L aminooxyacetic acid and 1 mmol/L
`gabaculine for 30 minutes at 37°C. Specificity of the uptake
`was evaluated by the addition of 2 mmol/L unlabeled GABA to
`the incubation mixture. Other substances were added as
`indicated below. The incubation was stopped by aspiration of
`the supernatant. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet
`was washed again with Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer and
`dissolved in lysis buffer (see above). The cell lysate was used for
`the determination of the cellular GABA content by liquid
`scintillation counting and of the protein concentration accord-
`ing to Bradford.17 GABA uptake is expressed as percentage of
`untreated controls (100% uptake).
`Statistics. Results are expressed as mean values ⫾
`SEM. Statistical differences between mean values were deter-
`mined by t test using the statistical functions of GraphPad’s
`Prism (version 2.0) software (GraphPad Software, San Diego,
`CA). P values of ⬍0.05 were considered significant.
`
`Results
`Intracellular cGMP Content in BON Cells
`Resting BON cells contained 109 ⫾ 5 fmol/well
`cGMP. Addition of 1 mmol/L IBMX increased basal
`cGMP levels (240 ⫾ 15 fmol/well; n ⫽ 6). Guanylin
`evoked a concentration-dependent increase in intracellu-
`
`lar cGMP levels, both in the absence and presence of the
`phosphodiesterase inhibitor, with a threshold concentra-
`tion of 10 nmol/L (twofold increment in intracellular
`cGMP). At the maximal guanylin concentration tested (1
`µmol/L, 30 minutes), cGMP levels increased by 54-fold
`without IBMX and by 62-fold in cells that had been
`pretreated with 1 mmol/L IBMX (Figure 1).
`To further characterize the pathways leading to cGMP
`formation in BON cells, the effects of guanylin were
`compared with those of specific activators of other
`membrane-bound receptor guanylyl cyclases. Experi-
`ments were exclusively performed in the presence of
`IBMX. As shown in Figure 2, STa and guanylin stimu-
`lated cGMP formation in BON cells, at 1 µmol/L peptide
`to 85-fold and 61-fold, respectively. The natriuretic
`peptides, atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic
`peptide, activators of particulate GC-A, also evoked a
`concentration-dependent increase in intracellular cGMP,
`but at a lesser extent (40-fold and 30-fold, respectively, at
`1 µmol/L peptide; Figure 2). In contrast, C-type natri-
`uretic peptide that activates GC-B had no effect on
`cGMP content in BON cells (Figure 2; open triangles).
`The NO donor, DEANO (up to 1 mmol/L) did not
`influence cGMP content in BON cells (Figure 1; control,
`240 ⫾ 60 fmol cGMP/well; DEANO, 1 mmol/L,
`250 ⫾ 50 fmol cGMP/well).
`Intracellular cAMP Content in BON Cells
`Unstimulated BON cells contain 1.2 ⫾ 0.23
`pmol cAMP/well (n ⫽ 6). Upon addition of the adenylyl
`cyclase activator forskolin (10 µmol/L), the phosphodies-
`terase inhibitor, IBMX (1 mmol/L), or the calcium
`ionophore A23187 (5 µmol/L), intracellular cAMP con-
`
`Figure 1. Concentration-dependent effects of guanylin and the NO
`donor DEANO on intracellular cGMP content of BON cells in the
`presence and absence of IBMX (1 mmol/L). Incubation time, 30
`minutes (n ⫽ 4).
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1040
`Page 003
`
`

`
`794 JOHN ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 114, No. 4
`
`lines, the
`cells (as positive controls). For both cell
`separation of the PCR products by agarose gel electropho-
`resis showed a strong band of the expected size of 439
`base pairs (Figure 4A; GC-C: lane 2, T84; lane 3, BON;
`lanes 4 and 5, negative controls).
`Cytosolic Ca2⫹ Concentration
`The basal fura-2 fluorescence ratio of BON cells
`was 1.28 ⫾ 0.04 (n ⫽ 8). In experiments in which a
`paired calibration at the end of the experiment was
`successful, a corresponding [Ca2⫹]i of 139 ⫾ 18 nmol/L
`was calculated. Addition of guanylin did not influence
`the fura-2 fluorescence ratio (1.14 ⫾ 0.08 at 10 nmol/L
`guanylin and 1.16 ⫾ 0.05 at 0.1 µmol/L guanylin) (see
`also original recording depicted in Figure 5). Consecutive
`additions of acetylcholine (1 µmol/L) and adenosine
`triphosphate (ATP) (100 µmol/L) within the same experi-
`ments (as a functional test of cell viability) induced fast
`and transient increases in the fura-2 fluorescence ratio up
`to 1.95 ⫾ 0.26 (n ⫽ 8) and 1.96 ⫾ 0.33 (n ⫽ 5),
`respectively (Figure 5). Calculated [Ca2⫹]i was raised to
`2.4 ⫾ 1.3 µmol/L by acetylcholine (n ⫽ 7) and to 1.8 ⫾
`1.5 µmol/L by ATP (n ⫽ 5) (peak values). STa, which
`was tested in three separate experiments, did not affect
`the fura-2 fluorescence ratio, i.e., basal [Ca2⫹]i of BON
`cells.
`
`Chromogranin A Secretion in BON Cells
`Basal concentration of chromogranin A released to
`the supernatant from untreated cells (controls) incubated
`for 25 minutes in Krebs-Ringer-HEPES buffer was
`
`Figure 2. Effects of ligands for different membrane-bound guanylyl
`cyclases (GC-A, -B, and -C) on the intracellular cGMP concentration of
`BON cells. Ligands for GC-A (atrial natriuretic peptide, CDD-ANP-99-
`126 [䊐]; brain natriuretic peptide, BNP [䊏]), for GC-B (C-type natri-
`uretic peptide, CNP [䉭]), and for GC-C (guanylin [䊊] and STa [䊉]).
`Basal cGMP concentration of BON cells was 0.23 ⫾ 0.02 pmol/well
`(in the presence of IBMX) (n ⫽ 6–8).
`
`centration increased significantly (Figure 3). The maxi-
`mal effects were elicited by forskolin (6.8-fold increase in
`basal cAMP level). Guanylin, STa, and acetylcholine
`showed no effect (Figure 3).
`BON Cells Express mRNA of GC-C
`To further examine whether the effects of guanylin
`in BON cells were mediated via GC-C, the expression of
`the GC-C was investigated at the mRNA level by
`RT-PCR in BON cells and human colon carcinoma T84
`
`Figure 3. Effects of guanylin, STa, forskolin, IBMX, acetylcholine, and
`A23187 on intracellular cAMP concentration of BON cells. Basal cAMP
`content of BON cells was 1.49 ⫾ 0.2 pmol/well (n ⫽ 6–8). Asterisks
`denote significant effects of the respective substances. P⬍ 0.05 was
`considered significant.
`
`Figure 4. Detection of GC-C mRNA in BON and T84 cells by RT-PCR
`analysis. Amplified DNA was analyzed by electrophoresis on ethidium
`bromide–stained agarose gels (1.5%). A GC-C PCR product of the
`expected size of 416 base pairs was detected in both T84 and BON
`cells (lanes2and 3). The intactness of the complementary DNA was
`tested by amplification of ␤-tubulin (lanes6and 7). No amplification
`products were detected in the respective controls (lanes 4 and 5).
`DNA size markers were pUC18 digested with Sau3AI (lane 1) and
`1-DNA digested with HindIII (lane8).
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1040
`Page 004
`
`

`
`April 1998
`
`GUANYLIN–STIMULATED NEUROENDOCRINE SECRETION 795
`
`GABA Secretion From BON Cells
`Basal GABA release from BON cells was 2.4% ⫾
`0.26% (n ⫽ 13) of the total cellular GABA, determined
`by means of scintillation counting of [3H]GABA. Treat-
`ment with either 50 mmol/L K⫹ or 1 µmol/L BayK 8644
`significantly increased the extracellular GABA concentra-
`tion to 17% above basal level (Figure 7A). In addition,
`regulated secretion of GABA was also enhanced by
`increases in intracellular cGMP. GABA release was
`increased to 16% and 26% above basal level at 0.1 and 1
`µmol/L guanylin, respectively, and to 15% above basal
`level at 1 nmol/L STa (Figure 7A). Again, these effects
`were mimicked by 0.1 mmol/L 8-Br-cGMP (increase of
`20% above basal level) or 0.1 mmol/L dibutyryl-cAMP
`(increase of 38% above basal level). In comparison to
`controls, stimulatory effects were highly significant (P
`values at least ⬍0.05, calculated as given in Materials and
`Methods).
`To exclude that the observed increases in extracellular
`[3H]GABA concentration were due to changes in the
`activity of the plasma membrane transporter instead of an
`exocytotic event by small synaptic vesicle analogues,2
`GABA uptake studies were performed. GABA uptake in
`untreated BON cells (100%) was inhibited by about 87%
`in the presence of 2 mmol/L unlabeled GABA, indicating
`that BON cells possess a specific GABA transport
`system. Neither 1 µmol/L guanylin and 100 µmol/L
`8-Br-cGMP nor 1 µmol/L BayK 8644 inhibited GABA
`uptake (Figure 7B).
`
`Figure 5. Effects of consecutive addition of guanylin, acetylcholine,
`and ATP on the fura-2 fluorescence ratio of BON cells (original
`recording). Measurements were obtained from BON cells grown on
`glass coverslips, passage 48, 3–5 days after seeding.
`
`11.8 ⫾ 4.3 ng/mL (n ⫽ 18). Figure 6A shows the
`secretory effect of guanylin. Chromogranin A release was
`stimulated up to 80% above basal level in the presence of
`1 µmol/L guanylin and to 110% above basal level by STa
`(1 nmol/L). Because IBMX exerted drastic effects on
`chromogranin A secretion (see below), guanylin- and
`STa-stimulated secretion were always analyzed in the
`absence of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor. The secretory
`responses to guanylin and STa were mimicked by the
`membrane-permeable synthetic cGMP analogue 8-Br-
`cGMP (Figure 6A). The effects of substances increasing
`intracellular cAMP (forskolin and IBMX; Figure 6B) or
`Ca2⫹ levels (acetylcholine, A23187, and BayK 8644,
`Figure 6B; potassium depolarization, Figure 6A) are also
`shown in Figure 6. IBMX (1 mmol/L) provided the
`maximal release of chromogranin A of all agents tested
`(nearly 800% above basal level).
`
`Figure 6. Effects of various test agents on the release of chromogranin A by BON cells. (A) Chromogranin A release on potassium depolarization
`and elevation of intracellular cGMP by guanylin, STa, or 8-Br-cGMP. (B) Increase of cellular cAMP levels (by forskolin or IBMX) and increase of
`[Ca2⫹]i (with Bay K8664, A23187, or acetylcholine), and subsequent chromogranin A secretion. Basal release of chromogranin A amounted to
`11.8 ⫾ 4.3 ng/mL during a 25-minute incubation period and was significantly stimulated by each of these agents. The basal release (control) or
`chromogranin A was set at 100%.
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1040
`Page 005
`
`

`
`796 JOHN ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 114, No. 4
`
`Figure 7. Effects of guanylin, STa, and 8-Br-cGMP on the (A) regulated secretion and (B) uptake of GABA by BON cells. (A) BON cells released
`GABA in a regulated fashion when treated with either 50 mmol/L K⫹ or 1 ␮mol/L BayK 8664. Increases in cellular cGMP levels by guanylin, STa, or
`8-Br-cGMP also induced a significant increase of GABA secretion. In addition, dibutyryl-cAMP induced a significant increase in GABA release from
`BON cells. Basal GABA release (control) under nondepolarizing conditions was set at 100%. (B) GABA uptake in untreated BON cells (control) was set at
`100%. In the presence of 2 mmol/L unlabeled GABA, the uptake of labeled GABA was inhibited by about 87%, indicating that BON cells possess a
`specific GABA transport system. Neither 1 ␮mol/L guanylin and 100 ␮mol/L 8-Br-cGMP nor 1 ␮mol/L BayK 8644 inhibited GABA uptake.
`
`Discussion
`Guanylin is a well-established peptide regulator of
`epithelial chloride and fluid transport in intestinal and
`possibly also in pancreatic, neuroendocrine cells. Gua-
`nylin occurs in epithelial cells and seems to be secreted
`apically to act on its receptor, GC-C, located also in the
`apical plasma membrane of epithelial cells. Thereby,
`guanylin seems to function in an endocrine, paracrine,
`and even autocrine manner.5
`Using the pancreatic neuroendocrine cell line BON,
`we show for the first time that guanylin mediates
`regulated secretion of secretory granules (chromogranin
`A) and small synaptic vesicle analogues (GABA) via an
`elevation of cGMP. Our data are supported by the
`detection of functional guanylin receptors (GC-C) in
`BON cells. GC-C expression was shown by means of
`RT-PCR at mRNA and at protein levels by stimulated
`intracellular cGMP formation after either guanylin or STa
`treatment. The observed effects were mimicked by the
`membrane-permeable cGMP analogue, 8-Br-cGMP,
`strongly suggesting that the second messenger, cGMP,
`indeed is able to influence, besides fluid and chloride
`transport, vesicular release of peptides and neurotransmit-
`ters in neuroendocrine cells. In BON cells, the E. coli STa,
`another ligand of the guanylin receptor GC-C, was more
`potent than guanylin in cyclic GMP formation in
`accordance with previous studies on the intestinal epithe-
`lial cell line T84 and native intestinal mucosal cells.6,18,19
`Further characterization of the cGMP pathway in
`BON cells showed coexpression of GC-C together with
`
`GC-A, the latter being a receptor for natriuretic peptides,
`whereas GC-B and soluble GC were not detectable
`(Figure 2). The observed, considerable lower effects of the
`natriuretic peptides for the induction of cGMP formation
`compared with guanylin and STa (Figure 2) are best
`explained by a lower expression level of GC-A compared
`with GC-C in BON cells.
`It is noteworthy that the extent of the cGMP-activated
`secretion parallels changes in [Ca2⫹]i, a pathway crucial
`in regulated secretion of BON cells.10,11 The drastic
`activation of BON cell secretion by the adenylate cyclase/
`cAMP pathway, i.e., by forskolin and IBMX, is most
`likely explained by activation of a specific cAMP-
`dependent protein kinase and phosphorylation of target
`proteins involved in exocytosis. Furthermore, the ob-
`served high cGMP levels induced by guanylin and STa in
`pancreatic neuroendocrine cells may also activate cAMP-
`or cGMP-dependent protein kinases.20,21
`increases in
`In pancreatic acinar cells of the rat,
`intracellular cGMP have been reported to mediate di-
`rectly cellular Ca2⫹ uptake combined with a replenish-
`ment of agonist-sensitive Ca2⫹ stores.22,23 By contrast, in
`BON cells, guanylin and STa did not affect [Ca2⫹]i (this
`study). This suggests that pancreatic acinar cells express a
`signal transduction pathway linking cGMP levels to
`vesicular release, which is different from neuroendocrine,
`pancreatic cells. These cell type–specific differences within
`the pancreatic organ may also reflect the observed
`variable secretory responses to circulating or locally
`increased guanylin levels.5
`
`Roxane Labs., Inc.
`Exhibit 1040
`Page 006
`
`

`
`April 1998
`
`GUANYLIN–STIMULATED NEUROENDOCRINE SECRETION 797
`
`Due to its expression in neuroendocrine cells,5 gua-
`nylin may be released from secretory granules via the
`regulated secretory pathway of these cells. In addition,
`because guanylin was localized in enterocytes,5,24 the
`peptide seems to be secreted from these cells via an
`unidentified secretory pathway. It is therefore conceivable
`that release of guanylin from enterocytes and/or neuroen-
`docrine cells in turn affects secretion of various other
`peptide hormones and neurotransmitters.
`In disease, e.g., in neuroendocrine gastroenteropancre-
`atic tumors associated with hypersecretion syndromes
`unresponsive to somatostatin therapy, the observed Ca2⫹-
`insensitive vesicular release may be of pathophysiological
`importance. Due to excessive release of guanylin as well as
`possible, other unidentified factors, pharmacological con-
`trol of hypersecretion (e.g., with somatostatin analogues)
`remains ineffective because of the lack of pharmacological
`agents controlling Ca2⫹-independent regulated, secretory
`pathways.
`In summary, cGMP stimulates the release of both
`neuropeptides and neurotransmitters from neuroendo-
`crine secretory granules and small synaptic vesicle ana-
`logues, respectively. Ongoing studies focus on a detailed
`molecular dissection of the signal transduction cascade
`mediated by guanylin leading to vesicular release and
`cross talks between secretory pathways. This should
`result in alternative therapeutics from current treatment
`modalities.
`References
`1. Bean AJ, Zhang X, Ho¨kfelt T. Peptide secretion: what do we know?
`FASEB J 1994;8:630–638.
`2. Ahnert-Hilger G, Stadtba¨umer A, Stru¨bing C, Scheru¨bl H, Schultz
`G, Riecken E-O, Wiedenmann B. ␥-Aminobutyric acid secretion
`from pancreatic neuroendocrine cells. Gastroenterology 1996;
`110:1595–1604.
`3. Li Z, Goy MF. Peptide-regulated guanylate cyclase pathways in rat
`colon: in situ localization of GCA, GCC, and guanylin mRNA. Am J
`Physiol 1993;265:G394–G402.
`4. Field M, Graf LH, Laird WJ, Smith PL. Heat stable enterotoxin of
`Escherichia coli: in vitro effects on guanylate cyclase activity,
`cyclic GMP concentration, and ion transport in small intestine.
`Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978;75:2800–2804.
`5. Forte LR, Currie MG. Guanylin: a peptide regulator of epithelial
`transport. FASEB J 1995;9:643–650.
`6. Kuhn M, Adermann K, Ja¨hne J, Forssmann WG, Rechkemmer G.
`Segmental differences in the effects of guanylin and E. coli
`heat-stable enterotoxin on electrogenic chloride secretion in
`human intestine. J Physiol (Lond) 1994;479:433–440.
`7. Reinecke M, David I, Cueni D, Forssmann WG. Guanylin is
`expressed in A-cells of mammalian islets. Exp Clin Endocrinol
`Diabetes 1996;104(Suppl 1):A115.
`8. Yuen PST, Doolittle LK, Garbers DL. Dominant negative mutants of
`nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase. J Biol Chem 1994;269:791–
`793.
`9. Reinecke M, David I, Loffing-Cueni D, Ablinger P, Cetin Y, Kuhn M,
`Forssman nWG. Localization, expression, and characterization of
`guanylin in the rat adrenal medulla. Histochem Cell Biol 1996;106:
`367–374.
`
`10. Evers BM, Ishizuka J, Townsend CM Jr, Thompson JC. The human
`carcinoid cell line, BON: a model system for the study of carcinoid
`tumors. Ann NY Acad Sci 1994;733:393–406.
`11. Jeng Y-J, Townsend CM, Nagasawa S, Chu S, Kern K, Yanaihara N,
`Ferrar RS, Hill FLC, Thompson JC, Greeley GH. Regulation of
`pancreastatin release from a human pancreatic carcinoid cell line
`in vitro. Endocrinology 1991;128:220–226.
`12. Kuhn M, Raida M, Adermann K, Schulz-Knappe P, Gerzer R, Heim
`J-M, Forssmann WG. The circulating bioactive form of human
`guanylin is a high molecular weight peptide (10.3 kDa). FEBS Lett
`1993;318:205–209.
`13. Kaever V, Resch K. Are cyclic nucleotides involved in the initiation
`of mitogenic activation of human lymphocytes? Biochim Biophys
`Acta 1985;846:216–225.
`14. Kruhøffer M, Bub A, Cieslak A, Adermann I, Kunstyr I, Forssmann
`W-G, Ma¨gert H-J. Gene expression of aphrodisin in female
`hamster genital tract segments. Cell Tissue Res 1997;287:153–
`160.
`15. Schlatter E, Ankorina I, Haxelmans S, Kleta R. Effects of diadeno-
`sine polyphosphates, ATP and angiotensin II on cytosolic Ca2⫹
`activity and contraction of rat mesangial cells. Pflugers Arch
`1995;430:721–728.
`16. Ahnert-Hilger G, Wiedenmann B. The amphicrine pancreatic cell
`line, AR42J, secretes GABA and amylase by separate regulated
`pathways. FEBS Lett 1992;314:41–44.
`17. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of
`microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principles of protein-
`dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976;72:248–254.
`18. Carpick BW, Garie´py J. The Escherichia coli heat-stable entero-
`toxin is a long-lived superagonist of guanylin.
`Infec Immun
`1993;61:4710–4715.
`19. Forte LR, Eber SL, Turner JT, Freeman RH, Fok KF, Currie MG.
`Guanylin stimulation of Cl⫺ secretion in human intestinal T84
`cells via cyclic guanosine monophosphate. J Clin Invest 1993;91:
`2423–2428.
`20. Chao AC, de Sauvage FJ, Dong YJ, Wagner JA, Goeddel DV,
`Gardner P. Activation of intestinal CFTR Cl⫺ channel by heat-
`stable enterotoxin and guanylin via cAMP-dependent protein
`kinase. EMBO J 1994;13:1065–1072.
`21. Pfeifer A, Aszodi A, Seidler U, Ruth P, Hofmann F, Fassler R.
`Intestinal secretory defects and dwarfism in mice lacking cGMP-
`dependent protein kinase II. Science 1996;274:2082–2086.
`22. Pandol SJ, Schoeffield-Payne MS. Cyclic GMP mediates the
`agonist-stimulated increase in plasma membrane calcium entry
`in the pancreatic acinar cell. J Biol Chem 1990;265:12846–
`12853.
`23. Gukovskaya A, Pandol S. Nitric oxide production regulates cyclic
`GMP formation and calcium influx in pancreatic acinar cells. Am J
`Physiol 1994;266:G350–G356.
`24. Cohen MB, Witte DP, Hawkins JA, Currie MG. Immunohistochemi-
`cal localization of guanylin in the rat small intestine and colon.
`Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995;26:803–808.
`
`Received December 3, 1996. Accepted January 2, 1998.
`Address requests for reprints to: Bertram Wiedenmann, M.D.,
`Universita¨tsklinikum Charite´ der Humboldt-Universita¨t zu Berlin,
`Medizinische Klinik m. S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Cam-
`pus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin,
`Germany. Fax: (49) 30-45053902.
`Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Deutsche
`Krebshilfe/Mildred Scheel Stiftung, and the Verum Stiftung.
`The authors thank Dr. C. M. Townsend, Jr., Department of
`Surgery, Medical Branch, University of Texas (Galveston, Texas), for
`his generous gift of BON cells;
`I. Eichhorn, E. Kock, and S.
`Haxelmans for their excellent technical assistance; and Drs. F.
`Hofmann and P. Ruth, Institut fu¨r Pharmakologie und Toxikologie,
`TU Mu¨nchen, for helpful d

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket