throbber
JAN. 9, 1960
`
`SURVIVAL OF BONE-MARROW GRAFT
`
`mu~m
`M~mtc~a.
`
`99
`
`antibodies to the recipient’s tissue cells by the marrow
`graft. That this has not been found in the present case
`may be due to the close relationship, and the fact that
`the donor is known to possess all the blood-group
`antigens found in the patient.
`
`Summary
`A patient is described who suffered from acute bone-
`marrow failure due to chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s
`disease. She was treated with a bone-marrow
`transfusion from her sister. Evidence is presented to
`show that the bone-marrow graft survived formore than
`six months, responsible for the production of an
`increasing proportion (now 24%) of the patient’s
`erythrocytes. A skin graft was undertaken between the
`donor of the marrow and the patient, but it was not
`successful.
`
`[ADDENDUM.--We repeated the haematologieal investigation
`on this patient on September 26, 1959. Rh-positive cells
`are still present in her circulation. Titration studies indicate
`that approximately 40% of her circulating ¢rythrocytes are
`Rh-positive. Woodruff and Lennox have recently published
`(Lancet, 1959, 2, 476) further details of the results of the
`skin grafts in blood-group ehimeras.]
`
`. We wish to thank Dr. L. E. Glynn, of the Canadian Red
`Cross Memorial Hospital, Taplow, Bucks, for the report
`on the biopsies; Dr. D. Galton, of the Chester-Beatty
`Institute, for supplies of aminochlorambucil; Dr. J.
`Humble, of the Westminster Hospital, for advice concerning
`the marrow transfusion ; and Dr. A. E. Mourant, of the
`Lister Institute, Chelsea Bridge Road, for reading the
`manuscript and for help given in writing it.
`
`REFERENCES
`Atwood, K. C. (1958). Proe. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.), 44, 1054.
`Dacie, J. V., and Mollison, P. L. (1943). Lancet, 1, 550 .
`Ford, C. E., Hamerton, J. L., Barnes, D. W. H., and Loutit, J. F.
`(1956). Nature, 177, 452.
`Humble, J. G., and Newton, K. A. (1958). Lancet, 1, 142.
`Jones, A. Richardson, and Silver, Sheila (1958). Blood, 13, 763.
`Kretchmer (1958). Ibid., 13. 297.
`Math~, G., Jammet, H., Pendi¢, B., Schwarzenberg, L., Duplan,
`J.-F., Maupin, B., Latarjet, R., Larrieu, M.-J., Kali¢, D., and
`Djukic, Z. (1959). Rev. tran¢. £t. ¢lin. biol., 4, 226.
`Porter, K. A., and Murray, J. E. (1958). J. nat. Cancer Inst., 20,
`189.
`Race, R. R., and Sanger, R. (1958). Blood Groups in Man, 3rd
`ed., p. 313. BlackwelL Oxford.
`Thomas, E. Donnall, Ashley, C. A., Lochte, H. L., Jharetzkl, A.,
`Sahler, O. D., and Ferrebee, J. W. (1959a). Blood, 14, 720.
`-- Lochte, H. L., and Ferrebee, J. W. (1959b). Ibid., 14, 1.
`Woodruff, M. F. A. (1957). Quoted by Race and Sanger (1958),
`p. 308.
`
`In his Annual Report for 1958 Dr. I. GORDON, medical
`officer of health of Ilford, comments on the difficulty of
`assessing radiation dangers. Medical officers of health, he
`writes, are worried that they and their staffs are not
`competently trained to evaluate radiation hazards, and
`feel that the Ministry of Health is showing unnecessary
`reluctance in providing this training. He continues: "We
`hope that the Ministry will shortly make it possible for local
`authorities to take an active part in controlling and
`evaluating this potential hazard, but the experience of the
`Essex County Council with regard to their own scheme does
`not give rise to optimism. It is true that if a hazard is
`suspected the medical officer of health can obtain a trained
`expert from the Ministry who will visit, inspect, and advise,
`but how can one even suspect a hazard which is only
`demonstrable with special instruments that one doesn’t
`possess, or how can suspicion be aroused by industrial or
`medical use of radioactive materials when information with
`regard to supply of these materials is withheld ? "
`
`MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OF
`PERNICIOUS ANAEMIA BY MASSIVE
`PARENTERAL DOSES OF VITAMIN
`AT INTERVALS OF TWELVE WEEKS
`BY
`
`J. D. KINLOCH, M.B., Ch.B., F.R.F.P.S.
`Medical Registrar, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow
`
`Parenteral vitamin B~ is now generally recognized as
`the treatment of choice in pernicious anaemia. Once
`full clinical and haematological remission has been
`obtained, various regimes have been recommended to
`provide adequate maintenance therapy (Mollin and
`Dacie, 1950; Blackburn et al., 1952; Conley et al.,
`1952; Davis and Brown, 1953; Hemsted and Mills,
`1958). The dosage advised has been of the order of
`20 to 100 ttg. every two to four weeks.
`If massive doses of vitamin B12 of the order of
`1,000/~g. or more could be given every three months for
`the maintenance treatment of pernicious anaemia, this
`would be a distinct advantage to the patient if it were
`to prove entirely safe.
`The cost of the larger dose would be slightly more,
`and, as most of the injected vitamin B12 is excreted in
`the urine within a short time of administration (Conley
`et al., 1951; Mollin and Ross, 1953; Reisner and
`Weiner, 1953), there would be greater wastage.
`However, ample compensation would be obtained by the
`reduction in the number of injections required and the
`consequent saving of both the patient’s and the general
`practitioner’s time.
`The effectiveness of large doses of vitamin B~
`parenterally at intervals of over six weeks in the
`maintenance treatment of pernicious anaemia has been
`studied in only a small number of patients (Conley et al.,
`1952; Walker and Hunter, 1952; Reisner and Weiner,
`1953).
`The purpose of this paper is to report the results of
`a trial in which 112 treated cases of pernicious anaemia
`were changed from orthodox maintenance treatment to
`maintenance treatment with 1,000 t~g. of vitamin B12
`parenterally every 12 weeks, most of them being kept on
`this regime for a period of two years.
`
`Material and Method~
`The diagnostic criteria observed for inclusion of
`patients in the trial were a macrocytic anaemia, megalo-
`blastic bone-marrow, histamine-fast achlorhydria, and
`a clinical and haematological response
`to the
`administration of vitamin Bx~ or liver extract.
`Of 155 patients with pernicious anaemia who had
`been fully treated and were attending hospital regularly
`for supervision, 112 were considered suitable for
`inclusion in the trial. Of the remaining 43, 30 were
`regarded as unsuitable because of other complicating
`disease: 9 had. early subacute combined degeneration,
`6 had incapacitating cardiovascular disease, 8 were
`elderly arthritic patients, 2 had cirrhosis of the liver,
`2 had polycythaemia vera, and 3 had other illnesses.
`Eight patients were unable to attend because of their
`employment, and five were partaking in another research
`trial.
`The 112 patients selected consisted of 85 women and
`27 men; their ages ranged from 31 to 85 years, the
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1029-0001
`
`JOINT 1029-0001
`
`

`
`100
`
`JAN. 9, 1960
`
`PERNICIOUS ANAEMIA
`
`average being 59. Every patient was requested to attend
`for supervision at intervals of four weeks. Injections of
`1,000 ~tg. of vitamin B~ (" cytamen ") were given once
`every 12 weeks. The haemoglobin and red-cell count
`were estimated at least every 12 weeks, and more often
`if the levels were not entirely satisfactory.
`Serum vitamin B~ assays were performed on the
`majority of patients, using the method described by Ross
`(1952) modified by Hutner et al. (1956) using Euglena
`gracilis 3 strain as the test organism. Samples were
`obtained at 18 months at random intervals of one, two,
`or three months after vitamin-B~ administration.
`
`Results
`To determine whether or not there was any
`deterioration in the haematological values during the
`course of the trial the mean of the first three and the
`mean of the last three red-cell counts and haemoglobin
`estimations were compared. The haematological levels
`at which it was considered desirable to maintain patients
`were:--for men: haemoglobin 100%, red-cell count
`5,000,000/c.mm. ; for women: haemoglobin 90%, red-
`cell count 4,500,000/c.mm.
`During the course of the trial three patients died from
`other diseases and nine were withdrawn owing to
`intercurrent illness or inability to attend.
`Of the remaining 100, 87 were maintained in the trial
`throughout a two-year period of study and showed
`no deterioration in their red-cell counts or haemoglobin
`values. Seventeen of these, however, were maintained
`with red-cell counts slightly under the desired levels,
`and two required intermittent oral iron therapy to
`maintain their haemoglobin levels.
`Thirteen patients wer~ withdrawn from the trial at
`intervals varying from 9 to 16 months (mean 14 months)
`on account of unsatisfactory red-cell counts, though
`none were below 4,000,000/c.mm., and in these cases
`the dosage of vitamin Bt~. was increased to 1,000 pg.
`monthly in an effort to determine whether or not an
`improvement might be obtained. Of this group, one
`patient had, after 12 months in the trial, developed
`paraesthesia of the hands and feet, which did not clear
`up until the dosage of vitamin B~. had been increased
`to fortnightly. Three patients were known to have other
`disease: one had mild rheumatoid arthritis, one had
`been under out-patient treatment for a year for
`pulmonary tuberculosis, and one had a probable
`bronchial carcinoma. These four patients had the
`lowest haematological values in the whole survey.
`Eleven of these 13 cases showed a rise of the red-cell
`count of 100,000-400,000/c.mm. (mean 300,000/c.mm.)
`following the more intensive vitamin-B~ therapy. These
`must be accepted as failures of the regime.
`Serum vitamin-B~ assays performed on the first group
`of 87 patients after 18 months showed satisfactory levels
`in all cases except in one performed three months after
`her last vitamin-B~2 injection, which gave a borderline
`result though her haematological values were normal.
`Facilities were not available for carrying out assays on
`the 13 patients of the second group at the time at which
`they were withdrawn from the trial.
`
`Summary and Conclusions
`One hundred treated cases of pernicious anaemia were
`maintained on a two-year trial to assess the adequacy of
`the maintenance therapy of 1,000 ~tg. of parenteral
`vitamin Bt; every 12 weeks.
`
`Throughout the period of study 87 patients showed
`no deterioration as judged by their haematological
`values (haemoglobin and red-cell count) and serum
`vitamin-B~ assays.
`Thirteen patients showed unsatisfactory red-cell levels
`after 9 to 16 months, and in II of these improvement
`was obtained by increasing the vitamin BI~ dosage to
`1,000/~g. monthly.
`It is concluded that one injection of 1,000 /~g. of
`vitamin B~ every 12 weeks provides adequate
`maintenance therapy for most patients suffering from
`pernicious anaemia. However, as this dosage is
`inadequate in a small number of patients it cannot be
`recommended as a general routine measure.
`I thank Dr. J. F. Adams, Western Infirmary, and Dr. J. C.
`Eaton, Department of Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary,
`Glasgow, for their assistance. I am grateful to Professor
`L. J. Davis and Dr. A. S. Douglas, University Department
`of Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, for their advice
`and encouragement.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Blackburn, E. K., Burke, J., Roseman, C., and Wayne, E. J.
`(1952). Brit. med. J., 2, 245.
`Conley, C. L., Green, T. W., Hartmann, R. C., and Krevans,
`J. R (1952). Amer. J. Med., 13, 284.
`-- Krevans, J. R., Chow, B. F., Barrows, C., and Lang, C. A.
`(1951) J. Lab. clin. Med., 38, 84.
`Davis, L. J., and Brown, A 0953). The Megaloblastic Anaemias.
`Blackwell, Oxford.
`Hemsted, E. II., and Mills, J. (1958). Lancet, 2, 1302.
`Hutner, S. H., Bach, M. K., and Ross, G. I. M. 0956). J.
`Protozool., 3, 101.
`Mollin, D. L., and Dacie, J. V. (1950). Proc. roy. Soc. Med.,
`43, 541.
`. and Ross, G. I. M. 0953). J. din. Path., 6, 54.
`Reisner, E. It., and Weiner, L. 0953). Blood, 8, 81.
`Ross, G. I. M. (1952). J. clin. Path.. $, 250.
`Walker, W., and Hunter, R. B. (1952). Brit. med. J., 2, 593.
`
`/DIETHYLCARBAMAZINE IN TROPICAL
`PULblONARY EOSINOPHILIA
`
`BY
`
`AJAI SHANKER, M.D.
`Lecturer in Medicine
`
`R. K. BHARGAVA, M.D.
`Lecturer in Medicine
`
`AND
`
`B. N. SHRIVASTAVA, M.B., B.S.
`Demonstrator in Medicine
`Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India
`
`Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia, which is widespread
`in India, is now recognized as a major cause of
`respiratory illnesses. It is increasingly regarded as an
`eosinophilic disorder in which bone-marrow, blood,
`lungs, liver, and probably other viscera may be involved.
`So far, its aetiology is mainly speculative, though
`allergy, parasitic infection, and viral infection have all
`been incriminated.
`Until recently, arsenic was the sheet anchor in its
`treatment. Antimony and bismuth (D’Abrera, 1946),
`sulphonamides (Joseph, 1946; Chaudhuri et al., 1954),
`chloroquine, and chlorbetamide (" mantomide ")
`(Ganatra and Lewis, 1955) have all given disappointing
`results. Chaudhuri (1950) and Prasada Rao and
`Krishnan (1952) reported encouraging results with
`chlortetracycline, but antibiotics have not proved
`effective in the hands of Misra el al. (1958), Reeder
`and Goodrich 0952), and Diaz Rivera et al. (1950).
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1029-0002
`
`JOINT 1029-0002

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket