throbber
161 SP I Phase 1 study of different sequences of MTA
`
`(LY231514) In combination with clsplatln In patients
`with solid tumours
`R. Th!\Qtm;mn 1•2 , H. Oepenbrock1·2 , H. Dumez', U Ohnmacht3, J. Blatter3,
`A. T. van Oosterom 1 , A.A. Hanauske 1 ·2 • 'UZ Gesthuisberg Le wen, Belgium;
`2 TUM Munich, Ge11T1Bny; 3 Ell Lilly Gennany; Bad Homburg, GefT11Bl1Y
`
`Introduction: The novel multi-targeted anbfolale (MTA) 1s a potent lnh1blt0< of
`thymldylate synthase, dihydrofolale redtx:tase and glycinamlde ribonucieotlde
`formyltransferase. MT A has shown encouraging antitumour aCIJVJly in vitro
`and In vivo and In single-agent phase I and phase II trials. The purpose
`of this study was to determine the maxJmum tolerated dose (MTD) and
`dos&-limlUng toxlcitles (DLT). pharmacoklnetics and amltumour aCIJVJty of MTA
`In combination with cisplatin (C).
`Patients and Methods: Patients (pts) with solid tumours with no proven
`treatment options were entered Into this tnal. In cohort 1, both drugs were
`admln'8tered on day 1; In oohort 2 MTA on day 1 and C on day 2. Treatment
`was repeated f!Very 3 weeks. In cohort 1 the starting dose was MTA 300
`mg/m2 and C 60 mglm2; In cohort 2 the startlng dose was MTA 500 mglm2
`and c 75 mglm2.
`Reaulte: In cohort 1, 40 pts were evaluable f0< toxicity. The MTD was
`reached at MTA 600 mg/m2 and C 100 mgtm2, WTtt1 thrombocytopenla and
`febrile neutropenia as DLTs. In cohort 2, 11 pis were evaluable for loXldty. In
`this schedule, thrombocytopenla grade 4 occurred in 1 pl al MTA 500 mg/m2
`and C 75 mglm2, and in 1 pt at MTA 600 mg/m2 and C 75 mglm2. Grade 4
`Infection was observed In 1 pt at each dose level, rash grade 3 In 1 pt at each
`dose lfNel. Grade 4 diarrhoea occurred In 1 pl al MTA 500 mglm2 and C 75
`mglm2, and grade 4 mucoslbs In 1 pt at MT A 600 mglm2 and C 75 mglm2. Al
`both dose levels 1 pt died due to therapy-related toxlcttles. Pharmacoklnetlc
`parameters of MTA were not Influenced by C administration and hydration
`Several responses were observed: In cohort 1, 11 pts, including 4 of 7 pis wrth
`mesothelloma: In cohort 2, 3 pts had minimal responses, and remain on study
`Concius.lon: The MTD of this combiMtion Is MTA 600 mgtm2 and C 100
`mglm2, If administered on day 1, with mye!osuppresslon as tile DLT. The day 1
`schedule was dlnically superior. This combination of MTA and cisplatin sl1ows
`encouraglng antitumour actMty.
`
`I s19p I Reduction of mlcrometastatlc tumor load by
`
`monoclonal antibody therapy: Influence of tumor
`antigen heterogeneity
`S. Braun. F. Hepp, W. Jann!, H.L Sommer, K. Pante! I. FraufJflklinik and
`Institute fvr Immunology. Univ. of Munich, Germany
`lntroductlon; Disseminated cancer cells In bone marrow (BM), are regarded
`as suitable targets for adiuvant lmmunotllerapy, because they are easily
`accessible for both lmmunoglobullna and Immune effector cells. Thls pllot
`study was designed to examine the Influence of Iha lndMdual antigen profile
`of such target cells on the potentlal treatment efficacy
`Methods: lndlvldual breast cancer cells In BM were Identified by the antl(cid:173)
`cytokeratin (CK) monoclonal antibody (mAb) A45-B/B3. To evaluate the antigen
`profile of these cells, we applied a quantitatlve doobl&-mBrker assay and typed
`10< four potential therapeulic targets ( 17 -1 A, MUC-1, Lew\s v, c-erbB-2). In a
`pllot study, five breast cancer patients wtth e CK• BM finding were trooted with
`a single dose of 500 mg Panorex", and were morntored for the elimination of
`17·1A co-expressing CK• cancer cells after 5-7 days.
`Results: CK• cells from 20 breast cancer patients typed In this study
`f0< the expression of the four antigenic targeta were found to represent a
`heterogeneous cellular population. The mean percentage of double-positive
`cells per total no. of CK• cells was 44% (0-75%) for 17·1A, 41% (o-67%)
`for MUC-1, 34% (0-59%) for Lewisv. and 42% (0-92%) for c-erbB-2. This
`was contrasteo by a mean count of 70% (34-100%) coek1all•tcK· cells If all
`four antigens were targeted simultaneously by the antibody-cocktail consisting
`of all four antigens. Thus, we considered tumor antigen heterogeneity a
`potential cause f0<incomplete tumor cell elimination by monovalent therapeutic
`approaches. This assumption was supported by our pilot study. Prior to
`treatment patients presented with 17, 67, 97, 115, 524 CK• cells per 1()11
`BM cells, and a mean percentage of 61% (range: 41-100%) C017·1A•/CK•
`double-positive cells per total no. of CK• cells. In all five pabents we assessed
`a remarkable reduction In both the no. of CK• cells (17-+5, 67->11, 97-.2,
`115-20. 524-+26) per 106 BM cells, and the percentage of 17·1A•tcK• cells
`(41%-+0%. 48%-.0%, 54%-> 10%, 60%-+ 15%. 100%-+17%) pertolal no. of
`CK• cells eher the administration of Panorex".
`Conclusion: Genomic lnstab1llty of carcinoma cells resuttmg m Iha reported
`pciycional phenotype of the disseminated tumor cell population may hmtt
`the efficacy of monovalent 1mmunogenetlc treatment strategies. Individual
`lmmunocytochemlcal mon1torfng of therapeutic tumor cell elimlnation Is feasible
`and suggest that Panorex" might be able to eliminate 17 -1 A+ breast cancer
`cells.
`
`Novel therapeutics and pharmacology
`I e20P I A phase I and pharmacoklnetlc (PK) study of the
`
`multltargetad antlfolate (MTA, LY231514) with follc acid
`(FA)
`L Hammond', M. Villalona-Calero'. S.G. Ed<han:t1 1 • L. Slu 1 , M. Hidalgo'.
`D. Thomton2, J. Waillng2, S. Baker, C. Cottman 1 , D. Von Hoff'. E. Rowinsky'.
`1 Cancer Theraw and Rosearch Center, San Antonio. TX. and 2 Eli Ulfy,
`Indianapolis, IN, USA
`
`lntroductlon: MTA, a new antJfolate that inhibits thymldy1ate synthasa, dl(cid:173)
`hydrofolate reductase, and glydnamide nbonucleotlde lormyl translerase.
`demonstrated notable broad ant!rumour actMty when Infused 10 min !. v. ev(cid:173)
`ery 21 clays. Myelosuppresslon predudad dose escala!lon above 500-600
`mglm2. As prectlnlcal evaluabons indicate that FA supplementation increases
`the therapeutic Index of MT A, this study was Initiated to determine If FA supple(cid:173)
`mentation permits significant close-escalation above the recommended phase
`II dose of MTA alone. Vrtamln metabol!les were measured to determine their
`value as potential prognostic mari<ers with this combination.
`Metflodll: So far, 33 mlnlmelly- and hsavily-pretreated pis received 90
`courses of FA (5 mg/day) lor 5 days startlng 2 days before MTA at 600, 700,
`800 925 mgim2. Vitamin metaboUtes were evaluated during cycles 1 and 2 as
`potential determinants of principal toxicities encl eflocts.
`Rawltll: Prtnclpal drug-related toxidUes Include neutropenla, anaemia and
`thrombocytopen1e, which were more severe In heavily-pretraated pts. Other
`toxicities (grade (G) 1-2) include rash, somnolence, fatigue, leg oedema,
`and a decrease In creabnlne dearance (CrCI). Severa toxldtles In 2 pis, 1
`who had taken a non steroidal anti-Inflammatory agent and 1 with severe
`hypoalbum1naemla, resolved after administration of klucovorin and thymldine.
`Preliminary vitarmn metabolites In 26 pts reveal: 2 and 3 of 11 pts with
`homocyste!ne 2: 10 had G4 thrombocytopenla and neutropenla, respectively;
`1 and 2 of 15 pis with homocystelne < 10 had G4 thrombocytopenla and
`neulroperna. respectively: 1 and 2 of 9 pts with elevated cystalhlonlne levels
`(cystathlonlne upper limit of normal 342 nMIL) had G2 somnolence and G1-2
`fatigue, respectlvely; 1 and 10 of 16 pts with normal cystalhionlne levels
`tiad G2 somnolence and G1-2 fatigue. respecttvely; 1 of 4 pts with elevated
`methylmalonlc acid (mathylmalonic acid upper llmll of normal 271 nM/L) had
`G2 fatigue while 12 of 22 pts with nonnaJ levels had G1-2 leUgue. 7 of 15
`pis with elevated homocysteine, cystathionine, or methyfmalonlc acid klvels
`tlad a significant decrease In CrCI. Based on lnfonnation from the$e 15 pta,
`addition of FA may reduce the usefulness of vitamin metabolites as predictors
`of toxicity.
`Concluak>ns: FA supplementation appears to pe!Tl11t MTA dose escalation
`by ameliorating toXJCity. Heavily· and mlnlmally-prelreated pts tolerate MTA at
`700 and 925 mgim2 and accrual contlnuas at 600 and 925 mgim2, respecilvely.
`
`Phannacoklnetlc (PK) and phannecodynamlc (PD)
`analysis of a phas~ study of Texof'(T), Carboplatln
`(C) with P-glycoproteln (P-gp) modulator PSC-833
`(PSC)
`M. Michael, A. Oza, M.J. Egonn, A. Patnruk, P. Flrby, LL Siu, M. Utchman,
`M.J. Moore. Princess Margaret Hosp/IBJ, University of Toronto, Toronto,
`Ontario, MSG 2M9, Cafl/'lda, University of Maryland, MD, Novartis
`Phal1'00C6utlcsls, NJ, USA
`
`Introduction: Cyctosporine analogues such as PSC reduce the clearance of
`PilP substrates (I.e. 1) and their maximum tolerated dose (MTD). This trial
`was dealgned to assess the MTD. PK ancl PD ol T and C with oral PSC In
`pallenta (pts) with refractory solid tumors.
`Methods: All patients were planned to receive a fixed dose of PSC (5
`mg/kg, p.a. 6 hr x 12, days 0-3) and T (baseline dose 54 mglm2, 13.5mglm2
`lncraments, 3 hr lnfUSlon, day 1) and C (target AUC 6-9 mg/mLmln, day 1).
`3-weekty. C AUCs derived trom a limited sampling model, and T PK parameters
`fitted to e 2-<::0mpartment model.
`Results: 58 pis entered Into 7 dose levels (DL), 41 had previous chemother(cid:173)
`apy, (34, 1 prior regimen). PK for DL 1-7 summarized below.
`
`DL
`
`2. 6, 7
`3,5
`4
`
`T
`Dose
`mg1rn2
`54
`675
`81
`945
`
`TBl"IJ"t
`C-AUC
`rr¢n.hr
`6
`6, 7.5, 9
`6
`6
`
`#
`pts
`
`3
`28
`23
`4
`
`C-AUC
`mwmt.hr
`
`T·AUC
`µ"1.hr
`
`T-CI
`LJ!u/rn2
`
`5.4
`6.3. 7 15. 7.55
`52
`6.7
`
`4.8
`5.94
`7.-W
`12.1
`
`13.19
`13.31
`13.47
`9.14
`
`llme
`(hr)
`T > 0.05µ"1
`20.46
`26.52
`28.0
`37.32
`
`No PK lnteractloo was noted between C & Tor PSC & C. The T and c doses
`showed a linear correlabon with% change nadir ANC (R2 = 0.95 respectively).
`their AUCs correlated less well with % change nadir ANC or platelets. PSC
`prolonged the time T > 0.05 µM at T 94.5 mg1m2 > than T 175 mg.tm2 alone.
`DL-2 and DL-5 were the MTOs of prior treated & chernonelve pis respectively.
`Concluelone: PSC by redl.ICing Ts clearance, prolongs the IIme T > 0.05
`1<M, wtlhout Influence on C PK. PSC reduced the MTD of the T & Ccomblnation.
`
`Annals of OncoioRY· Supplement 4 10 Volume 9, 1998
`
`(I 1998 Kluwer Acndamc Publisher>, Printed in The Netherlands
`
`129
`
`0
`0 :;-;
`::::;
`0
`O>
`Cl.
`(!)
`
`Cl. a 3
`
`O>
`::::;
`::::;
`0
`::::;
`()
`0
`><
`C'
`.9:
`
`0 3 OJ en
`
`0
`i:l
`C'
`'<
`(0
`i::
`(!)
`~
`0
`
`::::; .,,
`(!)
`C'
`2
`O> -<
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1015-0001
`
`JOINT 1015-0001

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket