throbber
fkNTICANCER RESEARCH 18." 3235-3240 (1998)
`
`Role of Folic Acid in Modulating the Toxicity and Efficacy of the
`Mulfitargeted Antifolate, LY231514
`
`JOHN F. WORZALLA, CHUAN SHIH and RICHARD M. SCHULTZ
`
`Cancer Research Dh,ision, Lilly Research Laboratotqes, Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN 46285, U.SM.
`
`Abstract. We studied the effects of folic acid on modulating the
`toxicity and antitumor efficacy of LY231514. Using several
`human tumor cell lines adapted to growth in low folate medium,
`/’olic acid was shown to be 100- to lO00-fold less active than
`j~linic acid at protecting cells fi’om LY231514-induced
`cytotoxicity. The lethality of LY231514 was compared in mice
`maintained on standard diet or low folate diet. The LD50
`occun’ed at 60- and 250-fold lower doses of LY231514 in DBA/2
`and CD1 nu/nu mice, respectively, maintained on low folate diet
`compared to standard diet. The L5178Y/TK-/HX- mut4ne
`lymphoma was much more sensitive to the antitumor action of
`LY231514 compared to wild type L5178Y-S tumors. For mice
`on low folate diet, LY231514 at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg (qd x 10, i.p.)
`produced 100% inhibition of L5178Y/TK-/HX- lymphoma
`growth, and significant lethality occun’ed at > 3 mg/kg. For mice
`on standard diet, LY231514 produced >95% inhibition of
`am~or growth at 30 to 300 mg/kg, but all mice died at 800 mg/kg.
`Folic acid supplementation was demonstrated to preserve the
`antitumor activity of LY231514 while reducing toxicity. The
`combination of folic acid with LY231514 may provide a
`mechanism for enhanced clinical antitumor selectivity.
`
`LY231514 is a structurally novel antifolate antimetabolite that
`possesses the unique 6-5-fused pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine
`nucleus (1) instead of the more common 6-6-fused pteridine
`or quinazoline ring structure. The primary mode of antitumor
`activity for LY231514 has previously been ascribed to
`inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) (1, 2). However,
`several lines of evidence suggest that multiple enzyme-
`inhibitory mechanisms are involved in cytotoxicity, hence the
`acronym MTA (multitargeted antifolate): 1) the reversal
`pattern for MTA in human leukemia and colon carcinoma
`cell lines demonstrates that although TS may be a major site
`
`Co~7"espondence to: Richard M. Schultz, Cancer Research
`Division, DC 0546, Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis,
`IN 46285, USA. Phone (317) 276-5508; fax (317) 277-3652; E-
`mail Schultz_Richard_M@Lilly.Com
`
`Key Words: LY231514, antitumor activity, antifolate, folic acid.
`
`of action for LY231514 at concentrations near the IC50,
`higher concentrations can lead to inhibition of dihydrofolate
`reductase (DHFR) and/or other enzymes along the purine de
`novo pathway (3); 2) MTA is an excellent substrate for
`folylpolyglutamate synthetase, and the Ki values of the
`pentaglutamate of LY231514 are 1.3, 7.2, and 65 nM for
`inhibition against TS, DHFR and glycinamide ribonucleotide
`formyltransferase (GARFT), respectively (3); 3) intracellular
`concentrations of LY231514 and its polyglutamates can
`exceed 40 ~M in CCRF-CEM cells when ~H-labeled
`LY231514 was used (R.M. Schultz, unpublished observation);
`and 4) early clinical studies demonstrated that patients who
`had previously failed to respond to ZD1694 and 5-
`fluorouracil/leucovorin treatment responded to LY231514 (4;
`DA Rinaldi, personal communication).
`Several animal studies have indicated that folic acid
`supplementation in combination with antifolate cancer
`therapy can prevent delayed toxicity and enhance the
`therapeutic potential of the GARFT inhibitor lometrcxol (5,
`6) and the TS inhibitor 1843U89 (7). Unexpected delayed
`cumulative toxicity was observed in phase I studies with
`lometrexol, including thrombocytopenia, anemia, and
`mucositis (8). Additional clinical studies demonstrated the
`protective effects of folic acid against lometrexol toxicity in
`humans (9). Morgan and coworkers (10) concluded that a
`daily supplement of 1 mg of folic acid during low-dose
`methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
`was useful in lessening toxicity without altering efficacy. In
`the present communication, we investigated the effects of
`folic acid on the antitumor activity and lethality of LY231514
`in mice.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Reagents. Folio acid, folinic acid (leucovorin), and 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-
`2yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTr) were purchased from
`Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The disodium salt of
`LY2315/4 was synthesized at Eli Lilly and Co. (1).
`
`Cel! lines. Human CCRF-CEM leukemia cells were ~htaincd from St.
`Jude Children’s Research Hospital (Memphis, TN, USA). Human
`IGROVI ovarian carcinoma cells were generously supplied by Dr.
`
`0250-7005/98 $2.00+.40
`
`3235
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-0001
`
`JOINT 1013-0001
`
`

`
`ANTICANCER RESEARCH 18:3235-3240 (1998)
`
`Barton Kamen (Univ. of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas,
`TX, USA). GC3 human colon carcinoma cells were obtained fi’om Dr.
`Janet Houghton, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Human KB
`epidermoid carcinoma cells were purchased from the American Type
`Culture collection (ATCC, Roclcville, MD, USA). The human LX-1 lung
`carcinoma cell line was established at Lilly from xenografl tissue. These
`cell lines were adapted to folic acid-free RPM 1-1640 medium containing
`L-glutamine and 25 hum HEPES buffer (Whittaker Bioproducts,
`Walkersville, MD, USA) and supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal calf
`serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Inc. (Logan, UT, USA) and 2 nM folinic
`acid. The L5178Y/TK-/HX- murine lymphoma cell line was obtaincd
`from Eli Lilly Department of Genetic Toxicoldgy (Greenfield, IN, USA).
`The tumor is a double mutant, deficient in thymidine kinase and
`hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl nansferase. It was cultured in RPMI-1640
`medium supplemented with 10% horse s+rum. The L5178Y-S wild type
`lymphoma cell line was obtained from ATCC and routinely cultured in
`Fischer’s medium (Whittaker Bioproducts) supplemented with 10%
`horse serum and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. All cell lines were tested and
`found free of mycoplasma contamination by the ATCC.
`
`hi vio’o cytotoxici~y testing. We used a modification of the original MTF
`colorimetric assay described by Mosmann (11) to measure cell
`cytotoxicity. The human tumor cells (previously adapted to growth in low
`folate (2 nM folinic acid) medium) were seeded at I x 104 cells in 80 I11 of
`assay medium/well in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates (Costar,
`Cambridge, MA, USA). Assay medium consisted of folio acid-fiee
`RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum
`and 2 nM folinie acid. Well IA was left blank (100 ~_d of growth medium
`without cells). Various levels of folic or fotinic acid (0.1 to 100 gM) were
`added to the wells and incubated //or 2 hours prior to addition o~
`LY231514. LY231514 was prepared in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered
`saline (PBS) at 1 mg/ml, and a series of two-fold dilutions were
`subsequently made in PBS. Aliquots (10 Id) of each concentration were
`added to triplicate wells. Plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37°C in a
`humidified atmosphere of 5% CO~-in-air. MTT was dissolved in PBS at
`5 mg/ml. Following incubation of plates, 10 ~d of stock MTT solution
`was added to all wells of an assay, and the plates were incubated at 37°C
`for two additional hours. Following incubation, 100-~d dimethyl sulfoxide
`was addcd to each well. Following thorough formazan solubilizatinn, the
`plates were read on a Dynatech MR600 reader, using a test wavelength
`of 570 nm and a reference wavelength of 630 nm.
`
`Mice. Female CD 1 nu/nu mice were purchased from Charles River
`Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Female DBA/2 mice were
`purchased from Taconic (Germantown, NY, USA). Mice weighed 20 to
`25 grams at the beginning of the studies. Mice were housed in
`temperature and humidity controlled rooms. Mice were fed either
`standard laboratory rodent chow (Purina Chow #5001) or folic aci&
`deficient diet containing 1% succinylsulfathiazole (Purina Chow
`#5831C-2); both diets were purchased from Ralston Purina Co. (St.
`Louis, MO, USA). The average content of folates from natural sources
`in both diets was found to be 0.03 ppm, whereas the standard diet was
`analyzed to contain 7.3 ppm of added folio acid. lit was estimated that
`mice on a standard diet ingested 1 to 2 mg/kg/day of folates, while mice
`on a low folate diet ingested 0.001 to 0.008 mg/kg/day. In so~ne studies,
`mice received solubilized fotic acid once a day by oral gavage. Food and
`water were provided ad libitum.
`
`bt vivo antitumor drag testing. L5178Y-S and 1,5178Y/TK-/HX were
`established and characterized in vivo for tumor growth in syngeneic
`DBA/2 mice. Cells derived from in vitro culture were washed twice by
`centrifugation (300 g for l0 minutes) in serum-free medium. Recipient
`DBA!2 mice were shaved and inoculated subcutaueously in the axillary
`region with 2 x ]06 cells’in 0.5 ml serum-free RPMI-1640 medium.
`LY231514 treatment was administered i.p. on a daily schedule for ten
`days and initiated on the day after tumor implant. LY231514 was
`dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride solution. All animals were weighed at
`
`the beginning and end of drug treatment, T~vo-dimensional
`mm~sure.ments (width and length) of all tumors were taken using digital
`electronic calipers interfaced to a microcomputer (12). Tumor weights
`were calculated from these measurements using the following fi3rmula:
`
`Tumor weight (mg)= tmnor length 0nm) x tumor width (ram)2/2
`
`Percent inhibition of tumor growth was determined by comparing the
`tumor weight in treated groups to that of controls, No group was
`included in the analysis for therapeutic activity in which deaths
`attributable to d~ ug toxicity exceeded 20% of the treated group,
`
`Results
`
`In vitro protective effect of folic or folinic acid for the cytotoxic
`activity of LY231514. We tested the ability of folic and folinic
`acid to protect human carcinoma and leukemia cells from
`LY231514-induced cytotoxicity. Previous studies demon-
`strated that the antiproliferative activity of LY23!514 for
`CCRF-CEM leukaemia cells was completely reversed by the
`addition of leucovorin (0.05 to ~6 gM) in a competitive
`manner (1). This suggested that LY231514 competed with
`natural reduced folate cofactors both at transport and
`intracellular folate levels and acted as a pure folate
`antagonist. In addition, we have reported that LY231514 is
`primarily transported via the reduced folate carrier (RFC) in
`h,uman cell lines (3). For the current studies, we utilized
`tumor cell lines that had been adapted over >4 weekly
`passages to growth in low folate (2 nM folinic acid) media.
`Varying concentrations of folic and folinic acid were added to
`these adapted cells 2 hours prior to LY231514 exposure. As
`shown in Table I, the sensitivity to LY231514 cytotoxicity
`(IC50) of low folate medium-adapted cells ranged from 3.6
`nM (CCRF-CEM leukemia) to 44 nM (IGROV1 ovarian
`carcinoma). In addition, Table I shows the ability of folic acid
`and folinic acid to modulate the cytotoxic activity of
`LY231514 in five different human tumor cell lines. Folic acid
`was approximately 100- to 1000-fold less active than folinic
`acid at protecting cells from LY23]514-induced cytotoxicity.
`Folic acid required concentrations of 10 gM or greater to
`exert significant protection.
`
`Enhanced lethality of LY231514 to mice with dietmy restriction
`of folic acid. Dietary folate deprivation has previously been
`shown to markedly enhance the toxicity of lometrexol (5). To
`assess the importance of dietary folate in modulating the
`toxicity of LY231514, LDs0 values were determined in mice
`maintained on standard diet (normal rodent laboratory chow)
`or on a special low folate diet (LFD). LFD mice have been
`shown to be significantly folate deficient in plasma and
`several tissues including liver and implanted tumors (13).
`Mice maintained on LFD for two weeks before
`intraperitoneal adminstration of LY23~514 daily for 10 days
`were extremely sensitive to the toxic effects of LY231514 with
`LDs0 values of 1.6 and 10 mg/kg for CD1 nu/nu and DBA/2
`mice, respectively (Figure 1). In contrast, the LDs0 values for
`CD1 nu/nu and DBA/2 mice maintained on standard diet
`
`3236
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-0002
`
`JOINT 1013-0002
`
`

`
`Worzalla et ak Folic Acid-Enhanced LY231514 Therapeutics
`
`Table I, In vitTv protective effects of jblic or folinic acid on LY231514-induced cytotoxieity,
`
`Relative (-fold) Change in ICs0
`
`Folio acid cone. in mediac
`
`Folinic acid cone. in media
`
`Ce!l linea
`
`[C50 (riM)b
`
`1 gM
`
`10 [~M
`
`100 btM
`
`IGROV1
`
`KB
`
`GC3
`
`LX-I
`
`CCRF-CEM
`
`44
`
`34
`
`12
`
`4
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`14
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`4
`
`25
`
`17
`
`9
`
`6
`
`22
`
`0.1
`
`28
`
`1 laM
`
`10 ~M
`
`100 gM
`
`370
`
`6
`
`105
`
`6
`
`22
`
`> 970
`
`78
`
`47
`
`82
`
`130
`
`> 970
`
`> 1270
`
`640
`
`1460
`
`4600
`
`aCells were adapted to >4 weekly passages in low folate (2 nM folinic acid) medium.
`bCylotoxicity was determined by Mq-T assay with 72 h exposure to LY231514. Data represent mean of triplicate determinations.
`CFolic or folinic acid was added two hours prior to LY231514 addition.
`
`were approximately 250- and 60-fold greater, respectively
`than mice on LFD.
`
`Table II. LY231514 antitumor activity against L5178Y/S wiM type and
`L5178Y/TK-/HX-lymphoma.
`
`Role of folic acid in the antitmnor activity of LY231514 against
`the L5178Y mulgne lymphoma. High circulating thymidine
`levels in mice decrease the efficacy and toxicity of TS
`inhibitors in mice (14, 15). Unless a tumor model which
`cannot salvage thymidine is utilized in mice, only limited
`antitumor effects for specific TS inhibitors have been
`observed. LY231514 treatment (i.p., qd xl0) produced
`modest activity against the wild type L5178Y-S murine
`lymphoma (Table II). In contrast, similar treatment of a
`variant of this line, L5178Y/TK-/HX-, produced potent tumor
`suppression (100% tumor inhibition on the day following the
`last drug treatment at 30 and 100 mg/kg per day) with 11 of 14
`mice tumor-free on day 100 after tumor implantation. This
`tumor is deficient in both thymidine kinase as well as
`hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase and
`consequently, cannot salvage either thymidine or the purines
`hypoxanthine and guanine. The exquisite sensitivity of the
`L5178Y/TK-/HX- tumor model to LY231514 treatment
`allowed us to evaluate the effect of low folate diet on the
`therapeutic activity of this compound. For mice on LFD,
`LY231514 at 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg/day (i.p. qd × 10) produced
`100% inhibition of tumor growth for tumors measured one
`day after the completion of a single course of drug treatment
`(Figure 2). As noted in Figure 1, higher drug levels yielded
`unacceptable toxicity. For mice on LFD that received a folate
`supplement of 15 mg/kg/day via oral gavage, significant
`inhibition of tumor growth was noted over a broad dose range
`(10 - 1000 mg/kg/dose). Moreover, 100% inhibition of tumor
`growth was observed at 30 to 1000 mgikg/dose without any
`lethality. This antitumor dose response (with folate
`supplementation) was virtually identical to that observed for
`mice receiving standard diet. However, the lethality was
`signicantly greater for the mice on standard diet (lethality at
`
`Tumor Dosea
`
`% Tumor Inh.b
`
`(mg/kg)
`
`# Tumor-free/total
`day 10c
`
`day 100
`
`,L5178Y/S
`
`I_5178Y/TK-/HX-
`
`10 o 0/10
`
`30
`
`100
`
`8
`
`68
`
`o/10
`
`0/I_0
`
`10 90 0/7 0/7
`
`30
`
`100
`
`100
`
`100
`
`5/7
`
`7/7
`
`6/7
`
`5/7
`
`aLY231514 was administered i.p. on a qd x 10 schedule.
`bTumors were measured on the day following the last drug treatment.
`CDays represent the number of days since therapy was initiated.
`
`400 and 800 mg/kg/day of 10% and 100%, respectively). Mice
`on standard diet received approximately one-tenth of the
`amount of daily folic acid as the mice on LFD with 15
`mg/kg/day supplemental folic acid.
`
`Discussion
`
`The poor predictive value of mouse models for antifolate
`toxicity may be partially due to the fact that standard
`laboratory mouse diets contain high levels of folio acid.
`Previous data demonstrated that serum and RBC folate levels
`of mice maintained on a diet formulated without added folio
`acid fall to levels considered normal in humans (5, 13). In this
`paper, we demonstrate that mice fed a low folate diet for a
`short period (2 weeks) became 60- to 250-fold more sensitive
`
`3237
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-0003
`
`JOINT 1013-0003
`
`

`
`ANTICANCER RESEARCH 18:3235-3240 (1998)
`
`lOO
`
`Q.. 20
`
`I
`/
`/
`/
`/
`
`/
`!
`/
`/
`
`~ 4o
`
`,-lOO
`
`,80
`
`~0 P
`
`o’.~
`
`~o
`~o
`;
`LY231514 (mg/kg per day)
`
`~o~o
`
`o.1 I lO lOO lOOO
`Drug Dosage (m~/kg)
`
`Figure 1. The toxicity of L Y231514 in mice is increased by a folate-deficient
`diet. DBA/2 and CDI nu/nu mice were fed either a standmzt laboratory diet
`(0 and ~/, respectively) or a folate-defieient diet for 2 weeks p~qor to tire
`first dose of LY231514 (@ amt Y, respectively) aud for tire duration of the
`study. Groups of mice (> 10 animals/©’oup) on each diet were given 10
`daily doses of LY231514 i.p. at the indicated doses. The data present the
`percent lethality within 3 weeks after the last dose of LY231514,
`
`Figure 2. Antitamor activity of LY231514 therapy (i.p., qd xlO) against
`L5178Y/TK- /HX- lymphoma for mice on low folate diet with no folate
`supplementation (©) and for mice on low folate diet that received 15
`
`mg/kg/day daily folate supplementation (/k). Ve~¢ical dashed lines represent
`percent lethality in mice on low folate diet with no folate supplementation.
`No letha#ty was obsen,ed in mice that received folate supplementation.
`
`to the lethality of LY231514 than observed in mice fed
`standard laboratory diet (Figure 1). The antifolate GARFT
`inhibitor, lometrexol has previously been sho~vn to
`accumulate in the livers of folate-deficient mice, and this
`accumulation was diminished by the administration of folic
`acid to these animals (16). These investigators hypothesized
`that the substantial and unexpected toxicity of lometrexol in
`humans not given concurrent folic acid and in folate-deficient
`mice is due to the sequestration of drug in hepatic tissue, with
`the subsequent slow release of drug to the circulation at
`toxicologically relevant concentrations. The mechanism for
`this accumulation of lometrexol in liver probably involves
`metabolism to polyglutamate forms by the enzyme folylpoly-
`~/-glutamate synthetase (FPGS). In this regard, Mendelsohn
`and coworkers (6) demonstrated that liver produced the
`greatest response in elevated FPGS to low dietary folate of all
`tissues tested. A similar mechanism probably exists for the
`potentiation of LY231514 toxicity by folate-deficient diet,
`since this compound is an extremely efficient substrate for
`mouse liver FPGS (1). In addition, LY231514 requires
`polyglntamation for cytotoxic potency (3).
`The uptake of natural reduced folate compounds and
`folate analogues into cells appears to involve membrane
`protein receptors of two different classes: a reduced
`folate/methotrexate carrier (RFC), which binds reduced
`folate in the micromolar range, and a high-affinity folate
`binding protein (mFBP), which preferentially binds to
`oxidized folate and other analogs with an affinity < 1 nM (17).
`Studies using a panel of ZR-75-1 human breast sublines with
`differing transport properties have demonstrated a
`predominant role for the RFC in intracellular transport of
`
`,LY231514 (3). Similarly, we now report that folic acid only
`weakly modulates the cytotoxic activity of LY231514 for
`various human leukemia and carcinoma cells adapted to low
`folate conditions (Table I). Some of these cells (KB and
`IGROV1) have previously been demonstrated to possess
`elevated levels of mFBP (18), further suggesting a minor role
`for mFBP in LY231514 transport.
`LY231514 produced potent antitumor activity against the
`L5178Y/TK-/HX- lymphoma at 100-fold lower dose levels
`(0.3 and 1 mg/kg/day, Figure 2) in LFD mice relative to 30
`and 100 mg!kg (Table II) in mice on standard diet. It is
`interesting to note that the LDs0 was reduced 3000-fold for
`lometrexol in LFD animals, and antitumor activity could not
`be demonstrated even at low dose levels (5). In contrast, the
`shift in both LDs0 and antitumor activity for mice on LFD
`compared to standard diet were of a similar magnitude
`(approximately 100-fold) for LY231514. However, LFD
`animals with high levels of folate supplementation
`demonstrated decreased lethality to LY231514 compared to
`conventional diet animals, suggesting that folate intake can be
`manipulated to achieve greater therapeutic effects. Oral folic
`acid dramatically decreased the toxicity of LY231514 and
`preserved antitumor activity (albeit at higher dose levels) in
`these mice (Figure 2).
`Previous studies have demonstrated that the multitargeted
`antifolate~ LY231514 has a unique biochemical and
`pharmacological profile. Exciting antitumor activity has been
`observed in phase I and II clinical trials, including responses
`in colon, breast, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancers.
`More advanced and extensive clinical trials of LY231514 are
`currently in progress. The combination of folic acid with
`
`3238
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-0004
`
`JOINT 1013-0004
`
`

`
`Worzalla et al: Folic Acid-Enhanced LY231514 Therapeutics
`
`LY231514 may provide a mechanism for enhanced clinical
`antitumor selectivity.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`The authors thank Sheryl Allen, Sherri Andis, Pat Forler, Pamela
`Rutherford, Tracy Self, and Karla Theobald for their skillful technical
`assistance. We also thank Dr. Beverly Teicher for helpful comments
`during the preparation of this manuscript.
`
`References
`
`l Taylor EC, Kuhnt D, Shih C, Rinzel SM, Grindey GB, Barredo J,
`Jannatipour M and Moran RG: A dideazatetrahydrofolate analogue
`lacking a chiral center at C-6, N-{4-[2-(2-amino-l,7dihydro-4-
`oxopyrrolo [2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-yl)ethyl]benzoyl} glutamic acid, a new
`and potent inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. J Med Chem 35: 4450-
`4454, 1992.
`2 Grindey GB, Shih C, Barnett CJ, Pearce HL, Engelhardt JA, Todd,
`GC, Rinzel SM, Worzalla JF, Gossett LS and Everson TP: LY231514,
`a novel pyrrolopyrimldine antifolate that inhibits thymidylate
`synthase (TS). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 33: 411, 1992.
`3 Shih C, Chen VJ, Gossett LS, Gates SB, MacKellar WC, Habeck LL,
`Shackelford ICA, Mendelsohn LG, Soose DJ, Patel VF, Andis SL,
`Bewley JR, Rayl EA, Moroson BA, Beardsley GP, Kohler W,
`Ratnam M and Schultz RM: LY231514, a pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine-
`based antifolate that inhibits multiple folate-requiring enzymes.
`Cancer Res 57: 1116-1123, 1997.
`4 Rinaldi DA, Burris HA, Dorr FA, Woodworth JR, Kuhn JG, Eckardt
`JR, Rodriguez G, Corso SW, Fields SM, Langley C, Clark G, Faries
`D, Lu P and Van Hoff DD: Initial phase I evaluation of the novel
`thymidylate synthase inhibitor, LY231514, using the modified
`continual reassessment method for dose escalation. J Clin Oncol 13:
`2842- 2850, 1995.
`5 Alati T, Worzalla JF, Shih C, Bewley JR, Lewis S, Moran RG and
`Grindey GB: Augmentation of the therapeutic activity of lometrexol
`[(6-R)5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolate] by oral folio acid. Cancer Res 56:
`2331-2335, 1996.
`6 Mendelsohn LG, Gates SB, Habeck LL, Shackelford ICA, Worzalla J,
`Shih C and Grindey GB: The role of dietary folate in modulation of
`folate receptor expression, folylpolyglutamate synthetase activity and
`the efficacy and toxicity of lometrexol. Advan Enzyme Regu136: 365-
`381, 1996.
`7 Smith GK, Amyx H, Boytos CM, Duch DS, Ferone R and Wilson
`HR: Enhanced antitumor activity for the thymidylate synthase
`inhibitor 1843U89 through decreased host toxicity with oral folio acid.
`Cancer Res 55: 6117-6125, 1995.
`
`8 Ray MS, Muggia FM, Leichman CG, Grunberg SM, Nelson RL,
`Dyke RW and Moran RG: Phase I study of (6R)-5,10-
`dideazatetrahydrofolate: a folate antimetabolite inhibitory to de novo
`purine synthesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 1154-1159, 1993.
`9 Laohavinij S, Wedge SR, Lind MJ, Bailey N, Humphreys A, Proctor
`M, Chapman F, Simmons D, Oakley A, Robson L, Gumbrell L,
`Taylor GA, Thomas HD, Boddy AV, Newell DR and Calvert AH: A
`phase I clinical study of the antipurine antifolate lometrexol
`(DDATHF) given with oral folic acid. Invest New Drugs 14: 325-335,
`1996.
`10 Morgan SL, Baggott JE, Vaughn WH, Young PK, Austin JV,
`I~umdieck CL and Alarcon GS: The effect of folio acid
`supplementation on the toxicity of low-dose methotrexate in patients
`with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 33: 9-18, 1990.
`11 Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and
`survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J
`lmmunol Methods 65: 55-63, 1983.
`12 Worzalla JF, Bewley JR and Grindey GB: Automated measurement
`of transplantable solid tumors using digital electronic calipers
`interfaced to a microcomputer. Invest New Drugs 8: 241-251, 1990.
`13 Schmitz JC, Grindey GB, Schultz RM and Priest DG: Impact of
`dietary folic acid on reduced folates in mouse plasma and tissues:
`relationship to dideazatetrahydrofolate sensitivity. Biochem
`Pharmaco148." 319-325, 1992.
`14 Duch DS, Banks SD, Dev IK, Dickerson SJ, Ferone R, Heath LS,
`Humphreys J, Knick V, Pendergast W, Singer S, Smith GK, Waters K
`and Wilson HR: Biochemical and cellular pharmacology of 1843U89,
`a novel benzoquinazoline inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. Cancer
`Res 53: 810-818, 1993.
`15 Jackman AL, Taylor GA, Gibson W, Kimbell R, Brown M, Calvert
`, AH, Judson IR and Hughes LR: ICI D1694, a quinazoline antifolate
`thymidylate synthase inhibitor that is a potent inhibitor of L1210 cell
`growth ht viO’o and in vivo; a new agent for clinical study. Cancer Res
`51: 5579-5586, 1991.
`16 Pohland RC, Alati T, Lantz RJ and Grindey GB: Whole-body
`autoradiographic disposition and plasma pharmacokinetics of 5,10-
`dideazatetrahydrofolic acid in.mice fed folic acid-deficient or regular
`diets. J Pharm Sci 83: 1396-1399, 1994.
`17 Antony AC: The biological chemistry of folate receptors. Blood 79:
`2807-2820, 1992.
`18 Schultz RM, Andis SL, Shackelford KA, Gates SB, Ratnam M,
`Mendelsohn LG, Shih C and Grindey GB: Role of membrane-
`associated folate binding protein in the cytotoxicity of antifolates in
`KB, IGROV1, and LI210A cells. Oncology Res 7: 97-102, 1995.
`
`Received May 5, 1998
`Accepted May 22, 1998
`
`3239
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1013-0005
`
`JOINT 1013-0005

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket