throbber
Tyos
`
`nnual meeting of the
`r’can Associatio
`Cancer Researc
`
`May 15-18, 1991
`Houston Texas
`
`-~"
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1011-0001
`
`JOINT 1011-0001
`
`

`
`PRECLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY/EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
`
`1920
`Folate Analogues: Nonpolyglutamylatable inhibitors of thymidylate
`synthase (TS) and GAR-formyltransferase (GARFTase). Nair, M.G,
`Abraham, A., Kisliuk, R.L., McGuire, J3;, Galivan J. Univ. of. South
`Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, Roswell
`Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, and Wadsworth Center for
`Laboratories and Research, Albany, NY 122011
`We have previously shown that replacement of the L-glutamate moiety
`of classical 4-amino antifolates such as methotrexate and 10-deazaamino-
`pterins with a 4-methylene glutamate results in a) potent inhibition of
`dihydrofolate reductase, b) high level of antifolate activity during continuous
`exposure to tumor ceils, c) enhanced ability to inhibit folinic acid transport
`to tumor cells relative to methotrexate and d) complete loss of substrate
`activity to folylpolyglutamate synthetase. These studies have now been
`extended to other antifolates, by r~placing the glutamate moiety of TS
`inhibitors PDDF and DMPDDF and the GARFTase inhibitor DDATHF, with
`4-methylene glutamate. The new compounds are non-polyglutamylatable and.
`effective inhibitors of folinic acid transport to H35 hepatoma cells. How-
`ever, the 4-methyleneglotamate derivatives are much weaker antifolates than
`their predecessors as judged by their ability to inhibit the growth of H35
`hepatoma and CCRF-CEM human leukemia cell growth. The results clearly
`indicate that polyglutamylation is a major determinant of non-DHFR type
`antifolate cytotoxicity.
`
`1921 ~
`Reversal of the toxicity but not the autitumor activity of
`Lometrexol by folic acid:
`Grindey, G.B., Alati, T,, and Shih, C. Lilly Research Labs.
`Indianapolis, Ind. 46285.
`Lometrexol, 5,10-dideazatetrahydrot’olic acid (DDATHF) has
`broad spectrum activity and good therapeutic index in routine and
`human xenograft carcinomas. However, severe toxicity was
`observed during initial Phase I trials (R.L. Nelson, pers. comm.).
`DDATHF (12.5-50 mg/kg/day X 5) is non-toxic and achieves >95%
`inhibition at all dose levels using C3H mammary carcinoma. In
`C3H mice placed on a relate-free diet for two weeks, DDATIIF
`toxicity is increased 100-fold. Antitumor activity is markedly
`reduced with only 21% and 88% inhibition o[ tumor growth
`observed at maximally tolerated doses of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg,
`respectively. High doses or, relic acid in the drinking water
`completely reverse both toxicity and activity. In contrast, low
`doses of relic acid (0~003%) prevent this dietary-induced toxicity
`and >90% inhibition of tumor growth is achieved from 6.25-50
`mg/kg of DDATHF. The tight-binding of DDATHF to the relic acid
`transport protein may be involved in these observations. The
`activity and toxicity of related analogs under these conditions is
`under evaluation. These results support the use of low doses of
`oral relic acid to reduce the toxicity of DDATHF in clinical trials.
`
`1923
`An altered Kt for the reduced folate transport
`system confers reslsta~ce to Lometrexol
`( (6R) DDATHF). O.Russello, B.A.Moroson,
`A.R.Cashmore, A.D.Cross, G.P.Beardsley. Dept.
`Pediatrics, Yale Univ. ,New Haven, CT 06510.
`A highly DDATHF resistant human lymphoblastic
`leukemia cell line (CCRF-CEM/CR 14) was obtained
`by further exposure of a previously developed
`resistant cell line (CRI5), to 1 mM (6R) DDATHF.
`The CRI5 line has defective polyglutamylation,
`but normal levels of GAR TFase and normal
`reduced folate transport. The derived CRI4 line
`can be mantained in 0.i mM (6R) DDATHF, 5 orders
`of magnitude above the ED 50 for the parent cell
`line. The CRI4 line showed the same
`polyglutamylation defect seen in CRI5. Kinetic
`parameters for GAR TFase from CRI4 were not
`different from those from the parent cell line.
`Study of the transport system revealed an
`increased Kt, but no differences in V ax or
`number of blndlng sltes. The same alteratlons in
`affinity were found for (6S)DDATHF, methotrexate
`and leucovorin. (CA 50721,IST and AIRC, Italy.)
`
`1924
`High-level methotrexate resistance in a human breast
`cancer cell line secondary to a novel membrane
`translocation defect.
`Pinard M-F and Jol~vet J. Institut du Cancer de
`Montr6al, 1560 Sherbrook~ east, Mont~4ai H2L 4MI.
`A 1,000-fold methotrexate (MTX) resistant ZR-75-1
`human breast cancer cell line w~th deficient
`polyglutamylation (J B~ol Chem 259: 10793, 1984) was
`found to be unable to accumulate MTX during short
`exposures to high drug concentrations. MTX initial
`uptake was only mildly abnormal w~th a 2.3-fold
`increased Kt in the resistant compared to the wild type
`cells and no Vmax alterations. At MTX concentrations
`~IO#M, initial uptake kinetics became identical and the
`cytotoxicity curves superimposable in both sensitive
`and resistant cells. The latter still could not
`accumulate or transstimulate MTX however, suggesting
`abnormal translocation of the reduced folate/MTX
`membrane carrier across the cell membrane and likely
`explaining the almost absent polyglutamate formation.
`Impaired MTX translocation can thus be responsible for
`high levels of drug resistance.
`
`1922
`Trimetrexate resistance in human colon cancer cells is
`associated with acute induction of dihydrofelatc rcductasc.
`JL Grem, DM Boatman, P Daychild, CJ Allegra. Medicine
`Branch, NCI, Bethesda, MD.
`The IDs~ for TMTX (24 h exposure (exp.)} in a cloning
`assay was 0.44 pM in SNU-C4 (C4) cells, while IICT-I!6 (116)
`and NCI-H630 (630) cells were 37- and 200-fold less sensi-
`tive. We studied several 8otentia[ resistance mechanisms.
`Uptake and retention o; |’~C]TMTX were similar i,, all 3
`lines. Differences in dTTP, ATP and GTP deplel, ion with TMTX
`did not account for the variable sensitivity~’ nor did dif-
`feret~ees in baseline DIIFR properties including catalytic
`act., binding capacity and binding affinity. ’rhymidylate
`synthase act. was 45% and 73% lower in 116 and 630 cells.
`Exp. to I ~M TMTX for 24 h resulted in a signif, increase
`(1.8- to 2.2-fold) in total DIIFR content in the 2 resistant
`lines (in binding assays and Western blot analysis). The
`increase in DilFR Content during TMTX was evident by 6-12 h
`and was prevented 5y concomitant exp. to tile protein
`synthesis inh~bitor cyclobeximide. The relevance of this
`phenomemon was suggested by rapl~ recovery of t,ree,
`bio]oglcally active DHFR ~u~d [6-’ll]dtJrd incorporation
`after TMTX removal in the resistant cells.
`
`1925
`In vlvo antitumor activity and metabolism of a series of
`open chain folate based GAR transformylase inhlbitors.
`Mullin, R.J., Bigham, E.C., Duch, D.S., Ferone, R., Keith,
`B.R., Smith, G.K., and Waters, K.A. Wellcome Research
`Laboratories 3038 Cornwallis Rd., R.T.P~, NC 27789
`The activity of 5-deazaacylotetrahydrofolate (5-DACTHF)
`an inhibitor of purlne de novo biosynthesis and potential
`antitumor agent has been reported. This study compares the
`properties of 5-DACTHF and a series of analogs, 2’-F,
`3’-F, 18-S and IO-CH=. All analogs have similar ICs~
`values for inhibition of MCF-7 cell growth, GAR trans-
`formylase, and methotrexate uptake by Molt-4 cells, a
`measure of cellular uptake potential. Only 5-DACTHF, 2’-F,
`and 3’-F demonstrate significant inhibition of colon 38
`adenocarcinoma growth in vivo. This correlates with the Km
`of these compounds for folylpolyglutamate synthetase. In
`support of this correlation, 24 hours after dosing, only
`those compounds with antitumor activity were detectable in
`tumor tissue, and they were present nearly exclusively as
`the polyglutamated species despite similar blood levels
`for all compounds. These results indicate that, following
`uptake, polyglutamation represents a critical step in the
`in vivo anti tumor activity of these compounds.
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH
`VOLUME 32 m MARCH 1991
`324
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1011-0002
`
`JOINT 1011-0002

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket