throbber
         
`
`Exhibit 1009
`
`S. S. Davis, The Design and Evaluation of
`Controlled Release Systems for the
`Gastrointestinal Tract, 2 J. CONTROLLED
`RELEASE 27 (1985) (“Davis 1985”)
`
`

`
`Journal of Controlled Reteose,
`27-38
`2 (1985)
`Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
`
`27
`
`THE DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF CONTROLLED RELEASE SYSTEMS FOR THE
`GASTROINTESTINAL
`TRACT*
`
`S.S. Davis
`Department
`of Pharmacy, University of #orti~gh~m,
`
`University Park, ~ottj~gham
`
`NG7 2RD
`
`[Great Britain1
`
`tract requires knowl-
`for the gastrointestinal
`systems
`The design and evaluation of delivery
`the drug,
`the delivery
`system and
`the destination
`edge about
`three
`inter-related
`topics,
`intended,
`preformulation
`data describing
`the physi~o~hemica~
`characteristics
`of a drug
`molecule need
`to be considered
`in relation
`to known physiological
`variables such asgastro-
`intestinal pH gradients and transit
`times. The drug progabide, which
`is unstable under acid
`conditions,
`is used
`to
`illustrate
`the delicate balance between physical
`and physiological
`variables and
`the use of physical models describing
`the biopharmaceutics
`and pharmaco-
`kinetic events
`for the design of an appropriate delivery system. Similarly,
`the use of in vitro
`dissolution
`tests and diffusion
`experiments
`can provide essential
`information
`on the mech-
`anisms of drug release but are not necessarily good predictors of the in viva situation. The
`non-invasive
`technique
`of gamma scintigraphy
`has been used
`to follow
`in vivo release rates
`and to relate
`these
`to pharmacokinetic
`parameters. The same scintigraphic method has been
`used
`to follom
`the gastrointestinal
`transit of a variety of controlled
`release systems
`to in-
`clude pellets, matrix systems and osmotic pumps. The effect of dosage characteristics
`and
`physiological
`variables, part~~u~ar~y diet, can be evaluated. Large (>5 mm) units will be
`retained
`in a fed stomach while smaller units can empty
`in a similar way
`to liquids. Small
`intestine
`transit
`time
`is short (3 h rt 1 h) for all systems studied. This result has implications
`for the design of controlled
`release delivery
`systems
`for drugs with poor absorption
`in the
`large intestine, as well as for the development
`of positioned
`release systems (colon
`targeting).
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Controlled release systems for oral use in-
`clude
`those designed
`simply
`to delay
`the
`release of a drug (for example an enteric
`coated system), as well as more complicated
`systems in the form of matrix tablets, coated
`pellets, osmotic pumps, etc., designed
`to
`release the drug over an extended period of
`time, either
`in a continuous manner
`(sus-
`
`*Paper presented at the Second International Sym-
`posium on Recent Advances
`in Drug Delivery Sys-
`tems, February 27, 28 and March 1, 1985, Salt Lake
`City, UT, U.S.A.
`
`tamed release) or as a series of pulses (timed
`release). Delivery
`systems,
`for positioned
`release at specific
`sites close
`to so-called
`‘“absorption windows” or for localized treat-
`ment can also be considered under the general
`title of controlled release systems.
`The rational design and evaluation of effec-
`tive controlled release delivery systems needs
`trinity of drug,
`to take
`into account
`the
`delivery
`and destination.
`Each one is inter-
`related to the other two and it is essential to
`consider all aspects and constraints
`for the
`successful development of a new system. Fac-
`tors such as the solubility and stability of the
`
`0168-3659/85/$03.30
`
`G 1985 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
`
`

`
`28
`
`regions
`the different
`from
`its absorption
`drug,
`release
`tract,
`the
`of
`the
`gastrointestinal
`characteristics
`of the delivery
`system
`in vitro
`and
`in uivo and gastrointestinal
`transit
`all
`need to be evaluated.
`Each of the
`three parts of the trinity will
`be considered
`in turn.
`In doing
`so it is as-
`sumed
`that
`the pharmacokinetics
`of the drug
`have been well characterised
`and a controlled
`release
`dosage
`form
`is required
`to
`fulfil
`a
`well defined
`clinical
`need,
`for example
`to
`change
`the dosage
`regimen,
`improve patient
`compliance,
`enhance
`the total bioavailabihty,
`reduce adverse
`reactions
`and side effects, etc.
`Hopefully,
`data
`on
`the
`relationship
`be-
`tween pharmacokinetic
`profile,
`the drug and
`(pharmacodynamic
`and
`clinical)
`response
`will be available
`to
`the pharmaceutical
`sci-
`entist. However,
`it is not unknown
`for con-
`trolled
`release
`systems
`to be requested
`and
`even developed, without
`reference
`to effec-
`tive blood
`(and
`tissue)
`levels and
`the
`ther-
`apeutic
`index
`of
`the drug, or
`the unavail-
`ability of same!
`
`-CHARACTERISTICS
`DRUG
`ENTITY
`
`Preformulation studies
`
`OF THE CHEMICAL
`
`of a
`characteristics
`The physicochemical
`are
`drug relevant
`to
`its biological
`availability
`determined
`at
`the preformulation
`stage of
`drug development.
`Data on such
`factors
`as
`PK a, pH,
`stability,
`solubility
`and partition
`(distribution)
`profiles,
`can be obtained
`by
`standard
`physicochemical
`methods.
`The rel-
`evance of some of these values
`to the biolog-
`ical situation
`has been questioned,
`particular-
`ly with
`regard
`to partition
`(distribution)
`data and its use in predicting drug absorption.
`The studies of Ho and others
`[l]
`on mem-
`brane permeability
`and
`the role of unstirred
`layers have shown
`conclusively
`that
`a large
`partition
`(distribution)
`coefficient
`) does
`(K,
`not necessarily
`lead to enhanced permeability,
`since at a limiting value of K,
`the process of
`
`as-
`one
`from
`changes
`control
`diffusional
`to one associated
`sociated with the membrane
`layers adjacent
`to
`with
`the aqueous unstirred
`the effect
`of
`the membrane.
`Consequently
`mucus
`layer
`in the gastrointestinal
`tract
`(and
`the glycocalyx)
`on drug
`transport
`is now
`receiving
`attention
`[Z] . Others
`[3]
`have
`questioned
`the use of 1-octanol
`as the solvent
`of choice
`in distribution
`experiments
`and
`have proposed
`that
`liposome
`systems may
`be more valid, although more difficult
`to use
`experimentally.
`to the
`relevant
`tests more
`Preformulation
`biological
`environment,
`such as those based
`on perfused
`intestinal
`loops
`in the
`(in situ)
`rat, can provide valuable
`insight
`into
`the ab-
`sorption
`behaviour
`of a compound
`in differ-
`ent regions of the gastrointestinal
`tract,
`and
`the
`existence
`of
`absorption
`windows
`or
`processes
`for
`facilitated
`transport
`[4]. As
`will be shown below,
`a significant
`and reli-
`able absorption
`of a compound
`from
`the large
`intestine
`may
`be a prerequisite
`for
`the
`successful development
`of a controlled
`release
`system
`intended
`for once daily administra-
`tion,
`particularly
`if
`the drug has a short
`half-life.
`The
`cannulation
`of
`thoracic
`(or
`mesenteric)
`lymph vessels can show whether
`the
`compound
`is transported
`lymphatically
`to any
`significant
`extent
`and whether
`this
`route,
`that has the advantage of avoiding
`first
`pass metabolism
`by the
`liver, has any benefit
`through
`the use of appropriate
`lipid contain-
`ing oral formulations
`or through
`the prodrug
`approach
`by making more
`lipophilic
`deriv-
`atives [5] .
`
`Physical models
`
`on
`information
`and
`data
`Preformulation
`to be correlated
`need
`physiological
`function
`approach
`to
`the
`so as to provide
`a rational
`choice
`of a delivery
`system. The new anti-
`convulsant
`progabide
`is an interesting
`exam-
`ple of the need to consider physiology
`as well
`as physical
`chemistry.
`Preformulation
`infor-
`mation
`for progabide
`is provided
`in Table 1
`(61. The drug
`is a weak base with a pK, of
`
`

`
`29
`
`TABLE
`
`2
`
`- Bioavailability
`Progabide
`dose = 600 mg)
`
`(mean + s.e.m.
`
`(n = 6);
`
`Formulation
`
`Drug size
`
`AUC (mg ml-’ h)
`
`Capsule
`Capsule
`Tablet
`Gaotroresistant
`tablet
`
`micronized
`coarse
`micronized
`
`9836
`4508
`8607
`
`f 2950
`* 655
`f: 819
`
`micronized
`
`4590
`
`* 1393
`
`the delivery
`in the stomach,
`from degradation
`powder
`into the intestines,
`of the undissolved
`it has minimal
`solubility,
`to
`a pH where
`disadvantageous.
`was even more
`An alter-
`native
`strategy was
`considered
`that
`took
`into account
`the high solubility
`of the drug
`at
`the acid pH of
`the
`resting
`stomach
`and
`the
`rapid emptying
`of the resultant
`solution
`of the drug from
`the stomach
`(tlh < 1 h) that
`could minimize
`losses due
`to degradation.
`The bioavailability
`of
`the drug
`in the un-
`protected
`form was
`indeed better
`than
`for
`the enteric coated system
`(Table 2).
`This
`compromise
`between
`necessary
`solubility
`and stability
`considerations
`and the
`importance
`of physiological
`factors, has been
`incorporated
`into a physical model
`[7]
`(Fig.
`1)
`that
`takes
`into
`account
`not
`only
`the
`factors discussed above, but other
`issues such
`as the precipitation
`of a proportion
`of the
`dissolved drug as it enters
`the intestines
`and
`the
`redissolution
`the
`fine particles
`so
`of
`created. Measured or estimated
`values of the
`various
`rate constants
`can be used
`to derive
`blood
`level-time
`profiles
`not only
`for pro-
`gabide but also for other drugs with similar
`stability
`problems
`and
`to assess the changes
`that would
`occur
`if
`formulation,
`dosage
`or
`physiological
`parameters
`were
`altered.
`The model has been validated
`in the rabbit
`by following
`the effects on the bioavailability
`of change
`in the particle
`size of administered
`progabide
`as well as the suppression
`of acid
`in the stomach by the use of an HZ-antagonist
`[6]. Both
`experiments
`indicated
`the over-
`riding
`importance
`of the dissolution
`step for
`
`(l-(4-chlorophenyl)1-(3-fluoro-6-
`-
`Progabide
`hydroxyphenyl))4-methylenimino
`butyramide
`General
`formula:
`C,,H,,ClFN,O,.
`Molecular weight:
`334.18.
`
`TABLE
`
`I
`
`Progabide
`
`- Preformulation
`
`profile
`
`(data at 37°C)
`
`PK,
`coefficient
`Distribution
`(octanol/water)
`
`(free base)
`
`3.41
`
`933
`
`in aqueous
`Stability
`(rrh) (min)
`
`solution
`
`Solubility
`(mg/l)
`
`in aqueous buffers
`
`18 (pH = 2.2)
`130
`(pH = 6.3)
`
`(pH = 2.2)
`9093
`44 (pH = 6.3)
`
`rate constant
`Absorption
`(rat gut loop, pH 6)
`(salicylic
`acid)
`
`(k, mm’)
`
`0.0854
`0.101
`
`at pH
`soluble
`3.41 at 37°C. It is reasonably
`soluble
`values below 3.0 but
`is very poorly
`above pH 4.0. The compound
`is hydrolysed
`to
`release GABA and a benzophenone.
`The
`pH-hydrolysis
`profile
`is in
`the
`form of a
`stability
`curve, maximum
`being
`bell-shaped
`found
`at around pH 6.3. At pH 2.2 the half-
`life of the compound
`at 37°C is about 18 min.
`The octanol-water
`distribution
`coefficient
`of
`the compound
`is in the region of 103. In situ
`intestinal
`loop
`studies have shown
`that
`the
`compound
`is rapidly
`absorbed
`in the small
`( tl12 = 8.1 min,
`cf. salicylic
`acid,
`intestine
`tlh = 6.9 min).
`In view of the poor stability
`of the compound
`at gastric pH a controlled
`release
`system was developed
`in the form of
`an enteric
`coated
`soft gelatin
`capsule
`that
`contained
`the drug
`as micronized
`powder
`(300 mg dose)
`dispersed
`in vegetable
`oil.
`However,
`bioavailability
`studies conducted
`in
`man (Table 2) revealed
`low levels of the drug
`and
`its metabolites
`in the blood
`following
`oral administration.
`Thus, while
`the enteric
`coat had been effective
`in protecting
`the drug
`
`

`
`30
`
`oral
`
`administratlon
`
`,
`
`‘1
`
`gastric
`py
`ydat ion
`
`je/
`
`2
`
`gastric
`
`absorption
`
`(kg)
`
`>
`
`ITI
`
`.
`
`I
`
`intestinal
`absorption
`
`(k,)
`
`elimination
`
`(kg)
`
`I
`
`Fig.
`1. Pharmacokinetic/biopharmaceutical
`- drug in eolution;
`shaded boxes
`
`- drug
`
`for drug absorption
`model
`in suspenrion.)
`
`following
`
`oral administration.
`
`(Open boxef
`
`the
`increasing
`instance
`for
`the compound,
`stomach
`pH by
`an H,-antagonist
`gave a
`marked
`reduction
`in bioavailability
`contrary
`to what would
`be predicted
`from
`stability
`considerations
`alone (Fig. 2).
`Ho, Higuchi and others
`[8] have developed
`a similar
`type of model
`approach,
`but have
`restricted
`this to the small intestine. Here the
`inter-relationships
`between
`particle
`dissolu-
`tion, drug permeability
`and
`intestinal
`transit
`have been
`considered.
`A unifying
`concept
`of the “reserve
`length” was introduced,
`this
`being
`the
`length of absorptive
`surface
`(small
`intestine)
`available
`after
`the drug had been
`absorbed.
`Thus,
`a drug
`that
`is rapidly
`and
`effectively
`absorbed
`in
`the
`small
`intestine
`would have a large reserve
`length. An equa-
`tion was presented whereby
`it is possible
`to
`determine
`the required
`particle
`size of a drug
`suspension,
`so that
`it would dissolve
`and be
`absorbed within
`the absorptive
`length of the
`small
`intestine
`(about
`300 cm). A similar
`approach was proposed
`for the calculation
`of
`the
`release
`characteristics
`of a controlled
`release
`pellet
`system
`so
`that
`too would
`it
`deliver
`its drug
`load uniformly
`within
`the
`length
`of
`the
`small
`intestine.
`The various
`physiological
`factors,
`namely
`flow
`rates
`in
`
`I.V.
`i2Omg/kg)
`
`0631.l~
`suspensial
`(n&l
`
`q Progabide
`0 Benzophen
`@ Metagabrde
`
`and metabolites
`of progabide
`2. BioavaiIability
`Fig.
`A:
`(ZOO mg/kg).
`administration
`rabbit
`-
`oral
`in
`(20 mgikg)
`(n = 5); B: micronized
`(n = 4); C:
`i.v.
`40-63
`urn suspension
`(n = 5); D: 212-300
`pm sus-
`pension
`(n = 3); E: 40-63
`pm
`suspension
`+ i.v.
`ranitidine
`(10 mg/kg)
`(n = 3).
`
`

`
`segments of the small intestine,
`the different
`the spreading of a particulate
`system during
`transit
`and
`transit
`times
`for passage
`from
`duodenum
`to
`ileocaecal
`valve, were
`taken
`from
`the limited
`information
`available
`in the
`literature
`on
`foodstuffs.
`The
`transit
`and
`spreading behaviour
`of pharmaceutical
`dosage
`forms
`is discussed
`further below.
`
`- CHARACTERISTICS
`DELIVERY
`DOSAGE FORM
`
`OF THE
`
`for the con-
`The range of systems available
`trolled
`delivery
`of drugs
`to
`the gastrointes-
`tinal
`tract
`is huge, and it is not
`the
`intention
`to review
`these here. Instead
`it will be stressed
`that
`the nature
`of
`the delivery
`system will
`be dictated
`by the properties
`and dose of the
`drug,
`the purpose
`for controlling
`the release
`of the drug and the interaction
`of constraining
`physiological
`and pathological
`factors.
`For
`example,
`as will be discussed
`further
`below,
`there
`is little point
`in attempting
`to develop
`a once daily, multip~ticulate
`system
`for a
`compound
`that
`is not absorbed
`from
`the large
`intestine,
`or has an absorption
`window
`in
`the duodenum
`or jejunum.
`
`Hydroxypropylmethylcelluiose
`
`(HPMCI
`
`investigating
`In recent years we have been
`the
`use
`of
`hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
`(and
`its modifications
`in the
`form of Syn-
`chron)
`for use as a controlled
`release system
`[9]. A variety
`of polymers
`of different
`molecular
`weight
`is available. As a means
`for making
`controlled
`release
`formulations
`the system has the advantage
`of needing no
`special machinery
`and
`is extremely
`robust.
`Wide
`tolerancies
`can be permitted
`in produc-
`tion
`factors
`such
`as compaction
`pressure.
`The
`release
`profile
`of a drug
`incorporated
`into
`the matrix
`can be altered by change
`in
`the polymer
`content
`as well as its molecular
`weight,
`the addition
`of soluble or insoluble
`excipients,
`surface
`active
`agents,
`etc.
`[lo].
`
`31
`
`the well
`to
`conform
`systems
`simple
`While
`(linear plot of
`release profile
`known matrix
`root of time),
`quantity
`released versus square
`zero-order
`release
`can be achieved
`by
`the
`addition
`of complexing
`agents
`that not only
`alter
`the solubility
`of the drug but also the
`viscosity
`of the hydrated
`polymer
`[lo]
`(Fig.
`3). Reasonable quantities of polymer
`(> 10%)
`may be required
`for an effective
`controlled
`release
`system based upon a dry direct com-
`pression matrix
`system, while much
`smaller
`quantities
`are necessary
`if a granulation
`step
`is included
`in
`the production
`process. The
`actual process
`of release of a drug
`from an
`HPMC matrix
`is a complex
`one
`involving
`water
`penetration
`into
`the
`drug matrix;
`hydration
`and gelation
`of the polymer,
`dif-
`fusion of the dissolved drug
`in the resultant
`gel and erosion
`of
`the gel
`layer
`[II].
`The
`modelling
`of these processes
`is further
`com-
`plicated
`by the swelling of the system
`[ 12 J .
`A conventional
`dissolution
`test will provide
`the
`resultant
`of
`these many
`separate
`pro-
`cesses, different
`ones being
`the
`rate control-
`ling at various
`stages of the release process.
`Recently we have examined
`the diffusional
`properties
`of HPMC systems by means of a
`novel ultrasound method
`[13 3. The penetra-
`tion of water
`into
`the drug matrix was ex-
`tremely
`slow and was affected
`by the pres-
`ence of dissolved
`solutes. The diffusion
`of
`water
`in a hydrated
`gel system was also quite
`slow (> 1 X loo6 cm2 s-‘) but solutes dis-
`
`it m e
`
`of chlorpheniramine
`release
`Fig. 3. The
`tablets. Legend:
`Methocel
`El5 matrix
`0, 15% sodium dodecyl
`sulphate.
`
`from
`(5%)
`0, no additive;
`
`

`
`32
`
`in the gel or in the diffusion medium
`solved
`increased
`the
`rate of diffusion
`(1 X
`greatly
`lo-’
`cm2 s-l). These
`results have been
`inter-
`preted
`in terms of the nature of bound water
`in HPMC gels and the effect of added solutes
`in reducing
`such binding
`[13].
`Interestingly,
`the
`release
`of a model
`drug
`from
`a drug
`matrix
`system made
`just
`from polymer
`and
`drug
`is more
`rapid
`than
`that provided
`by a
`40% hydrogel
`of HPMC (Fig. 4). This demon-
`strates
`the considerable
`difference
`between
`equilibrium
`and non-equilibrium
`states. These
`HPMC hydrogels
`have an interesting
`rubber-
`like consistency which may have applications,
`not only
`for oral use, but also
`for buccal,
`and
`subcutaneous
`routes.
`rectal,
`vaginal
`The
`low water activity
`in such systems should
`allow
`the
`incorporation
`of drug with formula-
`tion
`limitations
`imposed
`by poor
`stability.
`
`from
`
`(5%)
`of chlorpheniramine
`release
`Fig. 4. The
`tablets
`and 4% hydrogel.
`Methocei K4M matrix
`Matrix systems based on HPMC are normal-
`ly administered
`in the form of single units.
`Recently we have developed multiparticulate
`pellet
`(minimatrix)
`systems
`that can be for-
`mulated
`to give equivalent
`release
`profiles
`to
`the
`single unit
`system with
`its much
`smaller
`surface
`area. The
`gastrointestinal
`transit behaviour
`of single and multiple
`unit
`systems
`is discussed below.
`
`In vim evaluation of drug release
`it
`test, whether
`The
`in vitro dissolution
`be USP-Paddle,
`basket apparatus or variations
`
`rotating
`system,
`through
`flow
`as a
`such
`following
`are useful means
`etc,
`bottles
`for
`release profiles
`and the effect of formulation
`procedures.
`However,
`they may not be
`in-
`dicative
`of the situation
`in uivo where agita-
`tion
`and pH conditions
`can differ widely
`within
`the gastrointestinal
`tract.
`For
`this
`reason we have explored methods
`for provid-
`ing data on release profiles
`in uiuo [ 141. The
`deconvolution
`of pharmacokinetic
`data can
`be used
`in this way but
`it requires
`a large
`number
`of blood
`samples
`and
`therefore
`it
`is not
`suitable
`for
`the development
`of drug
`delivery
`systems.
`Instead, we have used ex-
`tensively
`the
`non-invasive
`technique
`of
`gamma scintigraphy.
`This technique
`not only
`provides
`data on release
`characteristics,
`but
`also on
`the position
`of the delivery
`system
`within
`the gastrointestinal
`tract.
`is labelled
`The
`formulation
`under
`study
`emitting
`with
`solute
`containing
`a gamma
`tlj2 = 6 h;
`radionuclide
`(e.g., technetium-99m,
`indium-111,
`a model
`ty2 = 2.7 h). Normally
`non-absorbed
`solute
`such
`as diethylenetri-
`aminepentaacetic
`acid (DTPA) or the imino-
`diacetic
`acid analogue
`of
`lidocaine
`(HIDA)
`is used
`to mimic
`a drug molecule
`being
`released
`by a process
`of diffusion, while a
`fine particle
`size
`ion-exchange
`resin
`is used
`to provide
`information
`about
`the
`integrity
`of a delayed
`release
`(e.g., enteric
`coated)
`tablet
`or
`the
`erosion
`of a matrix
`system.
`(The
`labelling
`of an actual
`drug molecule
`with
`a native
`gamma
`emitting
`isotope
`is
`possible,
`since
`the suitable
`isotopes
`of
`but
`carbon,
`oxygen
`and nitrogen
`are
`so short
`lived,
`special
`and
`expensive
`facilities
`are
`required.)
`In diffusion
`release
`studies,
`ex-
`tensive
`evaluations
`under
`different
`condi-
`tions of pH, agitation,
`etc., are carried out
`to ensure
`that
`the
`release
`of
`the
`in vitro
`marker molecule mirrors
`that of
`the drug
`under
`investigation.
`(If desired,
`the
`molecule
`actual drug of
`interest
`can be added
`to
`the
`formulation
`and
`its appearance
`in the blood
`or urine
`followed
`using conventional
`meth-
`ods.)
`In such cases
`the
`scintigraphic
`tech-
`nique
`serves as an adjunct
`to
`the pharmaco-
`
`

`
`informa-
`by providing
`investigation
`kinetic
`tion
`about
`the position
`of
`the
`formulation
`in
`the gastrointestinal
`tract
`and
`its
`in uiuo
`release characteristics.
`The amount
`of radio-
`labelled material
`incorporated
`into
`the
`for-
`mulation
`is as small as a few milligrammes
`and therefore
`the labelling procedure
`does not
`alter
`the physical
`properties
`of the delivery
`system.
`After
`the
`labelled
`formulation
`is dosed,
`the volunteer
`is placed
`in front of a conven-
`tional
`gamma
`camera
`(40 cm field of view)
`and by using external
`and internal non-inter-
`fering markers,
`the position
`of the delivery
`system
`in
`the gastrointestinal
`tract
`can be
`ascertained.
`The associated
`computer
`system
`is then used
`to create
`a “region of interest”
`around
`the
`image of the delivery
`system and
`the quantity
`of radioactivity
`remaining
`there-
`in can be determined.
`In this way an in uiuo
`release
`profile
`is created
`that
`can be com-
`pared with
`that
`found
`in uitro (Fig. 5) [9].
`Modern
`gamma
`cameras
`have
`the capability
`of measuring
`two
`radionuclides
`of differing
`energy
`characteristics
`simultaneously,
`and
`therefore
`it is a simple matter
`to administer
`to
`the
`same subject
`two
`formulations
`with
`different
`release characteristics,
`thereby
`con-
`ducting
`a cross-over
`study
`on
`the one oc-
`casion!
`The gamma
`camera
`technique
`has
`been used
`to evaluate
`not only
`the HPMC
`100
`
`\6
`
`lfl.5)
`,n ntro
`.
`0 !” viva L” ILLI
`
`10
`
`2 . 0
`
`(Time)i
`
`IhG)
`
`30
`
`Fig. 5. In vitro-in uiuo correlation.
`Release of 99mTc-
`f a.e.m.). Legend:
`EHIDA
`from matrix
`tablets
`(mean
`0, in vitro (n = 5); o, in uiuo (n = 6 (<2 b), 4 (> 2 h)).
`
`33
`
`type of system, but also the osmotic pump
`system
`for controlled
`release
`[15]. This was
`found
`to have an in uiuo release profile
`iden-
`tical
`to that found
`in vitro. Furthermore,
`the
`osmotic
`pump
`(Osmet) has considerable
`ad-
`vantage
`in preliminary
`investigations
`on drug
`absorption
`and
`controlled
`release
`systems.
`The Osmet device can be filled with a solution
`or suspension
`of drug under evaluation
`and
`provides
`a well characterised
`and constant
`(zero-order)
`release profile. The position
`of
`the device
`in the gastrointestinal
`tract can be
`ascertained
`by
`adding
`a small amount
`of
`labelled material
`and
`then
`passage of
`the
`system
`through
`the
`gastrointestinal
`tract
`can be correlated with changes
`in the pharma-
`cokinetic
`profile
`of
`the drug.
`In
`this way,
`absorption windows,
`lack of or erratic absorp-
`tion
`at certain
`sites
`(e.g.,
`colon)
`can be
`evaluated.
`Pumps with
`long start up
`times
`(e.g., 4 h) can be delivered
`to
`the
`lower
`in-
`testines
`the release of the
`filled drug
`before
`(and marker) commences.
`A further
`obvious
`use of the scintigraphic
`technique
`is
`the
`evaluation
`of controlled
`release
`systems
`in the form of enteric coated
`tablets. Delayed
`(positioned)
`release
`further
`down
`the gastrointestinal
`tract
`can be fol-
`lowed
`in exactly
`the same way as discussed
`below.
`The
`foregoing
`describing
`the use of scinti-
`graphic methods
`for
`the evaluation
`of drug
`release
`can be applied well
`to a single unit
`system, but not
`to a multiparticulate
`system
`such as controlled
`release pellets. For, while
`it is possible
`to determine
`the position
`and
`quantity
`of the dose
`in a given region of the
`gastrointestinal
`tract
`[ 161,
`the scintigraphic
`method
`is not
`able
`to distinguish whether
`the activity
`is still within
`the pellet or has
`been released and is in close proximity. How-
`ever,
`the combination
`of gamma scintigraphy
`with
`the
`related
`technique
`of perturbed
`angular
`correlation
`does
`permit
`both
`the
`position
`and
`the
`release
`to be evaluated
`simultaneously.
`Radionuclides
`that decay by
`emitting
`two gamma
`rays
`in cascade,
`such as
`indium-111,
`emit
`the
`rays with
`a certain
`
`

`
`34
`
`between
`correlation
`This
`them.
`angular
`correlation
`can be perturbed
`if the physical
`environment
`of
`the
`nucleus
`changes,
`for
`example
`from
`the solid
`to
`the
`liquid
`state.
`Beihn and Digenis
`[17] have used this meth-
`od
`to follow
`the dissolution
`rate of indium-
`111 chloride
`from a lactose
`tablet
`in a human
`subject.
`
`- CHARACTERISTICS
`DESTINATION
`GASTROINTESTINAL
`TRACT
`
`OF THE
`
`Physiology
`
`gastrointestinal
`the
`of
`physiology
`The
`in which
`tract
`and
`the manner
`this can be
`affected
`by disease
`conditions
`and adminis-
`tered drugs has a direct bearing on the design
`of controlled
`release
`systems. The generally
`accepted
`value
`for
`the pH of
`the
`resting
`stomach
`is about
`2.0, but values as high as
`6.0 have been recorded
`in normal
`individuals
`by aspiration
`or the use of radiotransmitting
`(Heidelberg)
`capsules
`[18]. The presence
`of
`food will raise
`the pH
`to 5 or 6, as will ad-
`ministered
`antacids
`and HZ-antagonists.
`The
`elderly
`have
`less acidic
`stomach
`contents
`than the young.
`The process of gastric emptying
`is affected
`by
`the quantity
`and nature
`of food
`in the
`stomach
`as well as the size and the digestibil-
`ity of the administered material
`[ 191. Solu-
`tions are emptied
`rapidly
`from
`the stomach,
`as are small particles
`of
`less than
`l-2 mm
`in diameter
`[20]. Particles greater
`than
`this
`have
`to be
`reduced
`in size by
`the normal
`digestive
`process,
`or
`if nondigestible,
`to
`await
`the end of the digestive phase and
`to
`be cleared
`from
`the stomach by the so-called
`interdigestive
`housekeeper
`wave
`[21] . This
`means
`that
`a single unit dosage
`form,
`ad-
`ministered
`to a fed stomach, will remain
`at
`that site until
`the end of the digestive phase.
`In contrast,
`a solution
`formulation
`(and
`dissolved drug), as well as small pellets, will
`be emptied
`during
`the digestive phase. Deliv-
`ery systems, administered
`to a fasted stomach,
`
`the stomach and can
`from
`rapidly
`will empty
`the small intestine
`to
`be transported
`through
`the
`terminal
`ileum
`in as little as 1.5-2
`h by
`an
`interdigestive
`housekeeper
`wave
`[22].
`Thus,
`if the
`important
`absorption
`sites
`for
`the administered
`drug are in the upper small
`intestine,
`the measured
`bioavailability
`in the
`fasted
`state will be considerably
`different
`to that measured
`in the fed state.
`Certain disease conditions
`such as inflam-
`matory
`lesions or disorders
`of gut motility
`as well as administered
`drug can affect
`transit
`behaviour
`[23]. Similarly,
`for patients with
`partial
`obstruction
`or narrowed
`lumen,
`the
`passage of a single unit
`formulation may be
`impeded
`[24].
`
`Gastrointestinal transit
`
`three years, we have fol-
`last
`the
`During
`lowed
`the gastrointestinal
`transit of a variety
`of pharmaceutical
`formulations
`(solutions,
`pellets, matrix
`tablets,
`osmotic
`pumps,
`etc.)
`using
`the
`technique
`of gamma
`scintigraphy
`[9, 14-161.
`To date, studies have been con-
`ducted
`in over 150 subjects. The majority
`of these people have been young male healthy
`volunteers,
`but
`some
`limited
`investigations
`have been carried
`out
`in elderly women,
`as
`well as in ileostomy
`subjects.
`Some data
`from
`one of our studies
`are
`shown
`in Fig. 6 for
`the
`transit
`of a pellet
`formulation
`(size 0.3-1.2 mm)
`in different
`regions of the gastrointestinal
`tract,
`together
`with
`representative
`scintiscans.
`The
`transit
`behaviour
`of
`solution,
`pellet
`and osmotic
`pumps
`[25]
`are summarised
`in Fig. 7, and
`compared
`to
`recently
`published
`data
`on
`solutions
`and solids
`in the form of foodstuffs
`[26].
`From
`these data and other
`associated
`studies
`the
`following major conclusions
`can
`be drawn:
`(i) Solutions
`and pellet
`systems
`empty
`quite
`rapidly
`from
`the stomach and the
`gastric
`emptying
`of pellet
`systems
`is
`delayed by the presence of food.
`(ii) Single unit systems
`can be retained
`in
`the stomach
`for long periods
`(10 h and
`
`

`
`35
`
`transit of pellets
`Fig. 6(a). Gastrointestinal
`diameter).
`Legend:
`l , stomach
`(St); 0, small
`
`ion exchange
`(““’ Tc-labelled
`i s.e.m.)
`(n = 6, mean
`intestine
`(SI); ~1, colon
`(total all regions).
`
`resin 0.9-l
`
`.2 mm
`
`Gastric emptying
`
`Small intestine
`
`transit
`
`Solutton Pellets
`
`Osmotic
`pumps
`
`Solution Pellets
`
`Osmotic
`pumps
`
`12 -
`
`lo-
`
`1 tllN
`
`15tllN
`
`3Q H I N
`
`1.5 HOUR
`
`4.5 HOUR
`
`QHOUR
`
`I_
`
`forms.
`of dosage
`transit
`7. Gastrointestinal
`Fig.
`Legend: LB .-- light breakfast
`(1500 kJ); HB - heavy
`breakfast
`(3600
`kJ); FA
`-
`fasted;
`SM
`standard
`meal.
`(a) Data
`from Ref.
`[ 261,
`solution
`and solid
`I- 5 mm
`in length).
`( fibre
`
`(iii)
`
`(iv)
`(v)
`
`*
`27 HOUR
`
`showing
`
`gastro-
`
`if administered
`
`after
`
`a heavy
`
`longer)
`meal.
`is remarkably
`transit
`intestine
`Small
`independent
`constant
`and
`of
`the
`nature of the dosage
`form or the nutri-
`tional state of the subject.
`The average small intestine
`transit
`time
`is of the order of 3 h + 1 h.
`Single
`units
`can be held
`for
`long
`periods
`(4-12
`h) at the ileocaecal valve
`before being moved
`into the colon.
`
`IQHOUR
`
`Fig. 6(b). Representative
`intestinal
`transit of pellets.
`
`22 HOUR
`
`1
`scintiscans
`
`

`
`36
`
`old
`for healthy
`pattern
`transit
`(vi) The
`for
`subjects
`is no different
`to
`that
`healthy young subjects.
`(vii) Total
`transit
`in young
`healthy males
`can be as short
`as 6-8
`h, especially
`for those on a vegetarian diet.
`is
`(viii) The
`transit
`of
`delivery
`systems
`similar
`to
`that of
`foods
`in that
`the
`intestine
`stomach
`and not
`the
`small
`discriminates
`between
`liquids and solids.
`(ix) Following
`rapid gastric emptying
`there
`is little dispersion
`(spreading)
`of liquid
`or pellet systems
`in the small intestine.
`These
`results have definite
`implications
`for
`controlled
`release
`systems.
`For
`instance,
`a
`number
`of recently
`developed
`controlled
`or
`sustained
`release
`products
`have claims
`for
`zero-order
`release
`over
`12 or even
`24 h
`periods
`of time. The relevance
`of such data
`to the clinical situation must be questioned
`if
`the drug
`is poorly
`or erratically
`absorbed
`from
`the
`large intestine
`or can undergo
`trans-
`formation
`by colonic
`bacteria. Dosage on an
`empty
`stomach,
`or after a light meal, could
`result
`in the delivery
`system
`arriving at the
`colon
`after
`only
`3 h. Consequently
`the
`greater proportion
`of the drug will be deliver-
`ed
`to
`a non-optimal
`site. Thus, data
`for
`regulatory
`submissions,
`showing
`the equiv-
`alence of a single unit controlled
`release sys-
`tem,
`to multiple
`doses of the drug over
`the
`same
`time
`scale,
`should
`be conducted
`in
`fasted
`and
`non-fasted
`subjects
`using
`in-
`dividuals with
`long and
`short
`total
`transit
`times.
`if
`to be gained
`is a clear advantage
`There
`a single unit
`system
`can be retained
`in the
`stomach
`for
`a significant
`period
`of
`time.
`The drug released
`from
`the system will empty
`from
`the
`stomach
`and have
`the whole of
`the small
`intestine
`available
`for absorption.
`For
`this
`reason attention
`has been
`focussed
`on
`floating
`devices
`[27]
`and
`the use of
`“mucoadhesives”
`to delay gastric
`emptying
`[28]. However,
`the clinical data
`in support
`of such approaches
`are few and success has
`been
`limited
`except
`in the
`field of animal
`medicine
`where
`gastric
`emptying
`can
`be
`
`prevented
`the delivery
`
`by the size and/or
`system.
`
`the density
`
`of
`
`Positioned release of drugs in the colon
`
`of
`transit
`the
`of
`constancy
`relative
`The
`can
`intestine
`in
`the small
`systems
`delivery
`that
`the design of systems
`be exploited
`for
`will provide positioned
`release.
`In certain
`disease
`co

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket